User talk:BuffaloBob/Archive 1

Image Tagging Image:Wille Nile.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wille Nile.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Secret london 06:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wille Nile.jpg has been listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Wille Nile.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Jewell / Jewel

Hi there. Thanks for contacting me.

My addition to Jewell had nothing to do with the spelling of the name Jewell. The addition was actually a reference to the gemstone, and not about any names. Disambiguation pages exist in order to point people in the direction of the article they were originally looking for. It is entirely plausable that jewell could be a mis-spelling of jewel, especially to somebody who does not speak English as their native language. Because of this, both my and your addition to Jewell are valid.

Thanks for your time. If you would like to ask me anything else, either about the Jewell article or anything else on Wikipedia, please drop me another message on my talk page. Finally, it is generally accepted that Wikipedians should sign their name and date on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~), and not just their name. -- gtdp ^(T)/_(C) 23:59, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Episcopal Church

I see you have been heroically fixing a number of links and redirects related to Anglicanism.

I agree with most of them, but I reverted 2 or 3 redirects; my explanation is at Talk:Episcopal#Why Episcopal needs disambiguation
These fixes may turn out to be never-ending task. Please comment on my move proposal at Talk:Episcopal Church#Proposed move, as I think that would help a lot.

--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Willienilecd.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Willienilecd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 06:11, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeeny Lou Carson.

Sorry for getting back to you so late; you were right about Jenny Lou Carson's origin. At the time, I was just adding infoboxes to articles that needed them and I didn't pay enough attention. My mistake. I've removed the origin. Acalamari 19:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Willie Nile Streets of NY.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Willie Nile Streets of NY.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello BuffaloBob, I have 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 19:47, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Acalamari, I will use it with care. BuffaloBob (talk) 00:15, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) Acalamari 00:36, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

King Biscuit

BuffaloBob, I put Warren Zevon and Willie Nile on the List of King Biscuit Flower Hour shows page. You can find them on May 11, 1980. Piriczki (talk) 00:41, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My Yiddishe Momme

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of My Yiddishe Momme, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: My Yidishe Mama. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:18, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In relation to this message, when moving an article to a different title, it is preferred that you not copy and paste the article. (This is because the article history is then missing.) Instead, move it as described by Wikipedia:How to move a page. Thanks for your work here. :-) --Iamunknown 19:19, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Lew Pollack

Oops, I did, didn't I? I've been running through all the songwriter/composer/lyricist cats and must have added this by mistake. Some people are separated into composers and lyricists for the same song, some have 2 cats because they contributed lyrics to some songs and music to a bunch of other songs. A couple have three cats. Very confusing, especially when the article is silent on who contributed what. In the case of Lew there's only 4 articles for songs he has written, do I move/create a category "Songs written by Lew Pollack" or do I create a second cat for "Songs with music by Lew Pollack"? I don't know, but feel it would be overcategorization. In the meanwhile, please feel free to move the song out of the cat - it is patently wrong at the moment. Regards. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:33, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for further note. I agree with you that there were "composers" and "lyricists" in the time of Pollack, in fact modern songwriting contracts still refer to both parts of a song separately. Curiously, Category:Songs by composer was deleted a couple of years ago, only to be recreated a month later. However, I can't see any value in having a category with one song in it, which is what you are proposing. Also, if you separate songs like this you could finish up categorizing songs by lyricist, composer, and "we just don't know," together with this, separating the two cats would diminish, say, Lew Pollack's contribution in total. Obviously, when known, the song will clarify, and there is no reason why a short piece of text can't be inserted into the cat for clarificaton. Just my thoughts. --Richhoncho (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/separation of different versions of the same song.

As somebody who appears to be interested in song articles you might be interested to know there is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs/coverversions with the purpose of trying to establish a standard rule for merge/separation of different versions of the same song. You are invited to comment. Regards, --Richhoncho (talk) 02:21, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Even the English versions are differ each from the other. In Hungarian I could hear three different versions (in different meaning) and a Gipsy music version ZJ (talk) 21:18, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Willie Nile

Hi - sorry, I don't get what that page has to do with my edits. --RobHutten (talk) 15:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - thanks for the reply. I base my edits on the standards defined by the wikipedia community, not by the common practices of other contributors. I can't fix all peacock language in every article so what happened on that other page is of no relevance to me. Cheers, RobHutten (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Willie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Willie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:29, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:2010 Winter Olympic Medal Table

It's not needed because we have a link to the official medal table. Just about every sports or news website has their own Olympic medal table, so why use one over the other?-- Scorpion ⁰⁴²² 03:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

flags

I fixed your user page so that there doesn't need to be any special coding for the flags of most countries. Hokie RNB 11:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1971 Macon baseball team

There's an article in Sports Illustrated about Lynn Sweet and the 1971 team. If I get some time this weekend, I may put a blurb about this into the Meridian article. Figured you'd like to have a look. It's a long read, but well worth it. http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1171199/1/index.htm BLGM5 (talk) 12:59, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let Me Go, Lover

WP:SONGCOVER says that cover versions should not be listed unless they have some form of notability. I have restored mention of the Hank Snow version, complete with a source, since Snow's rendition went to #1 on the country charts in 1954-55, but most of the others don't seem to be notable enough. If you can find sources proving that any other artist's rendition of that song charted, then that would be fine as long as the artist has an article. (Whitburn shows that Karen Kelly's version got to #75, but I can't find any info on her at all besides that, so I don't think she's notable or worth a mention.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:55, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RfD

Hello, please note that "RfD" does not mean "request for deletion". It is the page for handling redirects for deletion. You're looking for WP:AfD -- "Articles for Deletion". Please follow the instructions there on how to nominate an article for deletion, instead of using RfD on Aaron Jack. If you remember VfD, then the page WP:VfD or WP:Votes for deletion will still lead you to the correct place to list articles for deletion. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Buffalo, the discussion of Aaron Jack is now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Jack. Ego White Tray (talk) 21:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Third Opinion request

You recently attempted to make a 3O request by listing it at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests/Third Opinion, but unfortunately that's just a referral page, not a listing page. If you still desire a 3O, please make your request at Third Opinion. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 14:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC that you may be interested in...

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} ^{(t • e • c)} 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Dawn

Sorry, it was just a little confusion. No more trouble. Thanks for the advice – Eduardo Sellan III (talk) 13:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikinic for Buffalo?

Howdy. My name is User:Mitchazenia, a current resident on Tonawanda due to my parents living here. I have eight years experience with the Foundation's chapters and have been a big part of several Wikipedia picnics. I am looking for others in the Buffalo area to see if there is interest. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 21:31, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mitchazenia. A Wiknic for Buffalo sounds like a great idea. Have you gotten much feedback? I am probably twice the age of the average wiki editor and I don't know many other editors, so I am probably not the best person to consult with about place, time etc. So, let me know when and where it might be or what choices you are considering and I will try to make it if I am available. BTW, there is a nice county park, Chestnut Ridge south of Buffalo and it has lots of shelters but Delaware Park in the city is centrally located. Sunday July 26th might be a good date. BuffaloBob (talk) 19:02, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking Delaware Park myself, but no, not much luck. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 13:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ellicott Creek Park (Niagara Falls Blvd. N of I-290) might be a good choice. (My computer club used to use it regularly.) And “Yes”, if available. Useddenim (talk) 17:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would prefer to keep it in the city of Buffalo if possible. How does the Wiknic work? Is there a specific agenda? Could we also do a photo tour? Fortunate4now (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer Del. Park myself. The idea would be that we Wikipedians hang around, discuss Wikipedia in general. It's meant to be a gathering. See: Wikipedia:Wikinic. I can host and organize it, since I've done numerous NYC events myself. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 18:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Link started: Wikipedia:Meetup/Buffalo. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 18:43, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All fixed. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 22:55, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I had to change the date because I'm being dragged out for the weekend. Mitch32^{(The best ideas are common property.)} 03:43, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

List of African-American firsts

Hi. I wanted to let you know that I reverted your addition to the List of African-American firsts. The source you included only indicated that Leona Douglas made a record, not that she was African American or the first African American to record a country song. I searched for a source, but I was only able to find Facebook pages and internet forums, not reliable sources. If you can provide a reliable source for the assertion that Leona Douglas was the first African-American woman to record a country song, please restore it to the list. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 17:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about accruals

Hi BuffaloBob, I have a few questions about accruals. I was wondering about how companies use an "accrued expenses" liability account. Do you have any information about how that account would interact with a purchase order system? E.g. what kind of purchasing transaction, if any (e.g. generation of a purchase order or goods receipt), would hit that account? Thanks. AccountsPayable (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:AccountsPayable. You should know that Wikipedia is not generally a place to ask questions (see WP:NOT), unless your questions are about Wikipedia or how to use it. It is an encyclopedia. FYI, accrued accounts payable liability accounts are generally used to record an expense which has been incurred but the invoice for such expense has not been received and recorded as a liability. This necessary to comply the Matching principle of accounting.BuffaloBob (talk) 13:36, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the question was asked with the intention of using the information to improve Wikipedia article(s). Although I guess it would be better to find a reliable source outside Wikipedia. Different companies do things differently, though, so a source that describes one type of procedure might not be giving information that's applicable to the majority of companies. For example, a lot of companies don't use a purchase order system at all. Thanks. AccountsPayable (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Which Wikipedia article were you expecting to improve? You could pose these questions on that article's talk page, for example: Talk:Accounts payable. BuffaloBob (talk) 17:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's true. Although then there can be diffusion of responsibility (or simply no one watching). So, first I looked in the revision history, but didn't see anyone who seemed to still be actively editing Wikipedia; and then I looked for transclusions of Template:User CPA, and you were the first user in the list who is still an active editor. Lucky you. I guess another possibility was that I could've posted to WikiProject Business, but business is a lot broader than accounting. Actually, I just didn't know enough about the topic to know what articles it might lead to me to edit if I learned more about it, and quite possibly I was going to end up editing the accrual article, which probably doesn't have a lot of watchers. But yeah, you're right, Talk:Accounts payable could be a good starting place. Thanks. AccountsPayable (talk) 19:25, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines

Wow, you've been a lot of places. Are you thinking about visiting the Philippines sometime? It's a beautiful country with an interesting culture, and the people are generally hospitable, friendly, and outgoing. I've been to Manila (briefly), Cagayan de Oro, and Jasaan. There are some nice resorts in Mindanao. The one I went to was Duka Bay, which has a beautiful view, but kind of a sucky restaurant (although if I recall correctly, the breakfast was okay, and they'll deliver to your room for a small extra charge, which is nice). There's a town you can get to by tricycle that has a few convenience stores and usually some food grilled outdoors that you can buy. Some of the reviews said the mosquitoes were terrible, but I didn't find them to be so bad. They might be localized to particular spots. The service was pretty good in person, although by email they weren't always responsive. AccountsPayable (talk) 13:04, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to Malaysia and Singapore soon. BuffaloBob (talk) 22:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My fiancee wants to go to Bali with me. I guess it's one of the few places she can easily go with her passport. AccountsPayable (talk) 12:44, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arafat Nagi

The article Arafat Nagi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

First, a presumption of innocence exists; the subject has been charged but not convicted. Second, WP:BLP1E applies. The subject is not notable for any reason other than the charges brought against him. We should not create an article for everyone the authorities arrest on suspicion of terrorism (or any other charge).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. General Ization ^Talk 23:49, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted as a serious BLP violation. Please read the appropriate policy, WP:BLP, which is not optional. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 02:04, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't She Sweet

Sorry for the delay in getting back to you on this. My argument for removing the "By" parameter is that the song is (I think) not particularly associated with Ben Nernie in the sense that, say, My Way is with Frank Sinatra, so it seems a bit misleading to have him shown so prominently in the Infobox. However, I don't feel particularly strongly about it, so feel free to revert if you think that's best. Regards, AndrewWTaylor (talk) 12:05, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fort Holabird, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clint Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BuffaloBob. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Logan Date of Birth

Hello BuffaloBob. Per yours at mine, and as I explained in the remarks of my original edit, I don't take issue with 1901 or 1904; rather, I edited the paragraph so that the year of 1901 claimed in the second sentence of the article agrees with the claim of 1901 stated immediately previous in the very first sentence of the article - a year which is likewise recorded in the infobox. Had the edited 1904 been part of an explanation of countervailing claims, I would've left it as is - but it wasn't - it was a declaration. Thanks, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave Peters (talk • contribs) 03:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ozark Jubilee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alabama Jubilee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for help

Buffalo Bob, I see that in the past you have helped with the Ellis Paul article. I am trying to resolve a dispute regarding the article and am hoping you will lend support on the Talk:Ellis Paul page by offering a Third Party Opinion. In a nutshell, another editor removed a sound sample box that has been part of the article for 10 years. I would like to have a consensus to be able to add the sound sample back. I would appreciate your support. Thank you for your time and consideration. Kmzundel (talk) 11:53, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BuffaloBob. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BuffaloBob. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of PC Week

Hello BuffaloBob,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged PC Week for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 13:34, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Indexes

We have no connection with Google, etc. They update their indexes on their own time. Honestly, I don't know how the NOFOLLOW tags work; the Monroe article is full of unsourced statements which I've removed, but in general it looks good. DS (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{dagger}} usage question

Hello, I note you used the † character to, what I assume, signify a deceased member in this article. Is this a known Wikipedia style? Normally I've only seen †'s used for footnoting. Thank you. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 02:34, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

Hello 72.234.220.38, I first noticed the use of the † here: The Kingston Trio Past members in the Userbox and thought that it was an interesting way do show a subject was deceased, so I researched it and experimented with it. Why is your identity so discreet? I would be pleased to discuss this with you further, but I do not know what your intent is.

Hello BuffaloBob. Discreet? I have a total lack of discretion when editing here. 😉 If you mean why am I just a lowly editor after more than a decade of editing? Personal preference I suppose. My intent is just to discover if this is something new. And if it has been "blessed". I also am wondering if it may add confusion being that the {{dagger}} has been used for ages as a default footnote character? I won't even think of opening a probable kettle-of-fish by mentioning those who may take it as a christian-cross

image and take some sort of offense. I looked at a handful of other bands with deceased members and didn't see it used… but I'm assuming we have different musical tastes. I sorta like the idea, but am a bit torn about using it as others may disagree. Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 04:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

I was posting a link from Larry Monroe Forever Bridge to Laurie Freelove when I was shocked to discover that she had died. Having recently seen that dagger charachter on the Kingston Trio page, I thought it would be a nice gesture to add it next to her name. She is linked from the Larry Monroe mosaic because she was an Austin musician and has a tile on the memorial for Larry Monroe. If you feel that the dagger is inappropriate I have no objection to your removing it. BuffaloBob (talk) 18:20, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BuffaloBob. Understand. I'd not remove it as it seems like a clever idea. I'd even consider using the †, or some other character, myself for this very same deceased designation. What I wonder, as I'm no expert level Wiki editor, is if there is some place where this idea could be discussed and then codified as a legit Wiki Style. I was thinking of asking the originator of the idea (at least on the Kingston Trio page) about it – Edit shown here. But, there's a problem. This old-school Wiki editor seems to have "lost it" about a year ago and was blocked indefinitely. It's an interesting, but sad, read as to how it occurred. So, if this editor originated the idea, it may not be too well received. 🙄 If you happen to know the Wiki procedure to suggest style format additions, I'd be happy to support this. As long as the character choice is not too macabre, eg

! Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

User:72.234.220.38, the only suggest that I have, take a look here and review some of the archived discussion:

Help talk:Template. Good luck BuffaloBob (talk) 00:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again 72.234.220.38, after your comments here, I took it upon myself to put those daggers on a few musicians infoboxes, that was a BIG mistake. Unknown to me, at that time, there is not to be anything other than a name in an infobox, see the comments in the section below titled "deceased members". so, that puts a end to what we both thought was a good idea. BuffaloBob (talk) 21:08, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BuffaloBob. C'est la vie. I had this feeling that somewhere deep in recesses of Wikipedia's MOS this was probably a no-go. I now defiantly see the other side to this, as @SummerPhD^v2.0: alludes to, everyone dies - which would mean that eventually every band member, and every person in every infobox would have that † or some character next to their names. Think SummerPhD^v2.0's "members of the first century Roman senate" example. It would look silly. Regards. – ░▒▓ №∶72.234.220.38 (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2020 (UTC) ▓▒░[reply]

May 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Larry Monroe Forever Bridge, from its old location at User:BuffaloBob/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:51, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Sulfurboy, I have followed your instructions and moved my next article which I want to submit for review to a draft file: Draft:New York at Night (Willie Nile Album). Now, how do I request a review of the draft? Thank you for your help BuffaloBob (talk) 01:32, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Larry Monroe Forever Bridge has been accepted

Larry Monroe Forever Bridge, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:54, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deceased members

Yes, people die -- members of bands, cast members of TV shows, U.S. presidents, members of the first century Roman senate, signers of the Magna Carta.

Per the MOS and the descriptions of the individual infoboxes, we do not include who is dead (not "the late Julius Caesar" or Abraham Lindoln†) in infoboxes specifically and -- in general -- in individual articles unless the death is somehow relevant to the subject. So, an article about a battle might mention the deaths of notable individuals killed in that battle. An article about a novel, for example, likely would have no reason to mention the novelist is now dead (not "The Old Man and the Sea is a novel by Earnest Hemmingway (deceased).."). - SummerPhD^v2.0 21:00, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear SummerPhDv2.0, thank you for pointing out the error of my ways. I was merely adding what I thought was useful knowledge to the wiki user. Therefore I will abide by the MOS, although I don't agree with it. BuffaloBob (talk) 21:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Willie Nile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

✅--BuffaloBob (talk) 12:56, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: New York at Night (Willie Nile album) has been accepted

New York at Night (Willie Nile album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

GoingBatty (talk) 03:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peo, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and French.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:01, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Boo!

Happy Halloween!

Hello BuffaloBob:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
—usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 19:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanley Spisiak has been accepted

Stanley Spisiak, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chetsford (talk) 17:16, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Buffalo, New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buffalo River.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Houdaille Industries has been accepted

Houdaille Industries, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 04:34, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask why you're submitting drafts through Articles for Creation instead of creating articles directly? You're clearly an experienced editor, and all of your drafts have been accepted - going through AfC seems like it would be an unnecessary hassle... :) Spicy (talk) 04:41, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose I was thinking this was a fast way to get it assessed. Do you have a better recommendation? BuffaloBob (talk) 19:14, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decatur Tribune (June 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Idoghor Melody were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Decatur Tribune and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Decatur Tribune, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BuffaloBob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 23:04, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Decatur Tribune has been accepted

Decatur Tribune, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:16, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi BuffaloBob! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Articles for creation, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]