User talk:Catiline52/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Catiline52. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Catiline52, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi Catiline52! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 5 October 2018 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Yingjie Guo (academic) has been accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
DGG ( talk ) 10:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Jolly (politician) (October 10)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician) has a new comment
Disambiguation link notification for October 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of political parties in Australia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Religious right, Regionalism and Auburn Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)
Is there a reason you made this as a draft instead of an article from the start? Cheers. Onetwothreeip (talk) 22:11, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
- Honestly it was my first article I ever created. I was unsure how to make a page, and wikipedia suggested making a draft so it wouldn't be instantly published and others could contribute before it did get published. Catiline52 (talk) 01:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician) has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician) has a new comment
AfC notification: Draft:Stephen Jolly (politician) has a new comment
Do you have a source for Stephen Jolly being the leader of the party? All I can find on the VEC is that he is the Registered Officer. Onetwothreeip (talk) 22:08, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- The only source I could find was directly contacting party members. I'll try to find a better source though. Catiline52 (talk) 22:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- I'll try to check if the constitution is public. Catiline52 (talk) 22:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
List of historical political parties in Australia moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of historical political parties in Australia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 10:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialism in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Big Union (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
Hi there, Catiline52, and welcome to Women in Red. As a relatively new contributor, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:25, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
April 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A page you started (Independents For Climate Action Now) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Independents For Climate Action Now.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
nice work, has a list of candidates been released yet?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Sue Bolton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sue Bolton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sue Bolton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Frickeg (talk) 10:20, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:16, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialism in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cosme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sydney Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Peterson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July events from Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A beer for you!
|
Hey mate, thanks for making the Far-right politics
in Australia side bar. Cheers! Bacondrum (talk) 23:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for July 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Politics of Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agrarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thank you for your new article on Andy Fleming (activist).
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:33, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for August 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Victorian Socialists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dental care (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nationwide opinion polling for the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries
You have deleted polling data for Tulsi Gabbard in a separate column, but you have not put those data back into the 'Others' category. Now there's just no data for Gabbard. Could you please clean up your mess? Anjoe (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 06:45, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
File:Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg
Hey Catiline52, thank you for your creation of File:Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg. I was hoping you could make one edit to the image: on the map, Vermin's color is currently #ff5555ff, which is visibly close to McAfee's color. The article has Vermin's color as #FFB6C1, or light pink. Could you update the image to correspond better with the article, changing Vermin (New Hampshire) to light pink? Thanks! Ghoul flesh • talk 18:39, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
- Fixed it! Thanks for mentioning it, I didn't realise they had fixed colours. Catiline52 (talk) 02:44, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
to commons
Hi. Please can your moving Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg to commons? Than i can use this in der de.WP.--Sarkana ask the ℑ vampire 20:42, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Moved it over to commons. Catiline52 (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you.--Sarkana ask the ℑ vampire 19:06, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
File:Libertarian Party presidential primaries results, 2020.svg
Hello again! Jacob Hornberger won the Libertarian Iowa caucus tonight, so if you could shade Iowa #DAA520 on the image that would be fantastic! Thank you! Ghoul flesh • talk 05:01, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Category:2020 United States Green Party presidential campaigns has been nominated for discussion
Category:2020 United States Green Party presidential campaigns, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. TM 15:49, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Thanks for adding some info about Fred Paterson. It's always cool to see a fellow Aussie whos interested in the lesser-known parts of our history Blackfalcon501 (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2020 (UTC) |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Howie Hawkins series
Template:Howie Hawkins series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Wow (talk) 06:58, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Greens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Family First (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
Motorists Party
What would you think about moving this to Motorists Party (Queensland) and having a disambiguation page between it, the Australian Motorist Party, and the Australian Motoring Enthusiasts Party? It seems odd to me to have a state party that had a completely different focus until five minutes ago at the main title over two arguably better-known parties (one of which elected a Senator). The Drover's Wife (talk) 06:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- There was a blank page for the Motorists Party before I transferred, I didn't think about making it a disambiguation page. That sounds like a way better idea. Catiline52 (talk) 06:43, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
- Done! Thanks for the feedback. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:38, 11 March 2020 (UTC)
Socialist parties
Thanks for your work on sorting through the mess that is the various socialist parties - it always reminds me of the Monty Python & the people's front of Judea. For the 1913 NSW election you mentioned that there was some suggestion the other socialist candidates were from the Socialist Labor party. I have gone through contemporaneous newspapers on Trove & those that identify candidates as more than merely socialist agree that the candidates were either Australasian Socialist or Socialist Labor, so I have updated the article & results page to reflect that & cited the International Socialist [1] and the People: The Offical Organ of the Socialist Labor Party of Australia [2]. I figure the SLP paper is a pretty reliable source for the candidates the party endorsed endorsed. --Find bruce (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for that! Most of the datasets lump early socialist parties together as just 'Socialist' which is annoying since there were 3 different organised socialist parties which ran at the time, and some of the people kept changing parties every election. It's understandable though since most of them were insignificant electorally, but only really influential through unions. Catiline52 (talk) 00:40, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Party names & colours
In case you were trying to figure out why your edits to {{Australian politics/name}} & {{Australian politics/party colours}} weren't working, the input in those templates need to be in lower case - ie t4t, not T4T, which then means the end user can enter either upper or lower case. --Find bruce (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
- Oh thank you! I was trying for ages and wasn't sure why it wasn't working. Catiline52 (talk) 23:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Federation Party
Hello Catiline52,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Australian Federation Party for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JBL (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to South-South East Asia, though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:35, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Merger discussion for Australian Country Party (2004)
An article that you have been involved in editing—Australian Country Party (2004)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Heyitsstevo (talk) 06:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 15
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Socialism in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Socialist Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:57, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
inadvertant misunderstanding
accidentally sent msg off wiki re the issues partially dealt with above at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Catiline52#Socialist_parties - sincerest apologies for the misunderstanding... JarrahTree 12:44, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Two-party-preferred vote, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Socialist Equality Party and Reason Party.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Socialist Alternative.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Good job!
|
Politics Cat Prize 2020 |
| Here is a prize of a cat picture in recognition of your substantive edits to politics wiki pages Psypheriumtalk page 18:16, 13 October 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you for that! Catiline52 (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:15, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons at Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hi Catiline52, I am editing the department of labour (Australia) wikipedia page and would highly appreciate some feedback on the information/ structure of my article so far.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariposa124 (talk • contribs) 10:49, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May Women in Red events
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:51, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:19, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in August 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging