User talk:Enivak/Archives/2019

Welcome Enivak!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 48,309,810 registered editors!

Hello, Enivak. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.

To help get you started, you may find these useful: The Five Pillars (fundamental principles) of Wikipedia A Primer for Newcomers Introduction to Wikipedia Wikipedia Training Modules Simplified Manual of Style Creating a new article via the Article Wizard

When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies: 1. Neutral point of view: represent significant views fairly 2. Verifiability: claims should cite reliable, published sources 3. No original research: no originality; reference published sources Brochures: Editing Wikipedia & Illustrating Wikipedia Ask a Question about How to Use Wikipedia Help

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

Sincerely, S0091 (talk) 17:21, 22 June 2019 (UTC)   (Leave me a message)

Help me!

Dear fellow wikipedians, I want to ask you a question: I want also to contribute to the Greek Wikipedia (because I am Greek), but I don’t know: shall I create a new account to do that, or I can us that one?

Enivak (talk) 19:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Enivak! I searched around and found [1] which states user accounts are global across all wikis so you should be able to use this one for the Greek Wikipedia. S0091 (talk) 20:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, accounts can be used on any Wikimedia project. 331dot (talk) 20:10, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks both! I have and a last question: I must translate my user page to Greek, or make a new one there? Enivak (talk) 20:38, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

According to WP:GUP, you can create a global user page on Meta. Instructions for transitioning existing user pages is included. S0091 (talk) 20:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks again, sorry if I am posting so much notices! :-) Enivak (talk) 20:43, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

No apology necessary. You are doing the right thing by asking questions and actually helping me learn by trying to answer them. :) S0091 (talk) 20:47, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

-) Enivak (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

I also want also to ask something irrelevant: How can I register on the WikiProjects? (I know that I am new and the most possible thing is that they will not accept me, but I am interested in joining the automobiles and the music one because I am a musician and I am interested in automobiles) Best regards, Enivak (talk) 10:26, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi again! It depends on the project, apparently. For WP:WikiProject Automobiles, you add {{User WikiProject Automobiles}} to your userpage (just copy/paste). For others, you add your name to a member list on the project site. There is no acceptance criteria so once you add yourself, you are member. Easy! :) Also, your talk page is on my watchlist which is how I see you have posted something. However, I am not around consistently so you might want to ask questions at the Teahouse or by using a new help template. Of course, I am always happy to help but don't want you to have wait for me. Also, see WP:TP which has guidance on using talk pages. There's a format to follow (indenting, etc.). S0091 (talk) 15:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! I thought it was a more complicated thing, but I see it is easy! Also, thanks for your continued happiness in helping me and other new users like me! Enivak (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Παρακαλώ! (Note, I used Google translate so hopefully this means "you are welcome").  :) S0091 (talk) 17:37, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, it does! Cool! Enivak (talk) 17:47, 23 June 2019 (UTC) I have now logged in on my computer, I will start training. I can't wait until I'm ready to do normal contributions! Thanks, Enivak (talk) 10:48, 25 June 2019 (UTC)

Dear user @S0091:,

I have one question: the policy about the user access levels says:<<Although the precise requirements for autoconfirmed status vary according to circumstances, most English Wikipedia user accounts that are more than four days old and have made at least 10 edits (including deleted ones) are considered autoconfirmed>>. However my account is more than 4 days ago and has circa 100 edits, and i am not received something that says that i am autoconfirmed. And, i have not the IP block exception flag, nor i am using the Tor network to have the restrictions. What i should do to gain that status? Thanks again, Enivak (talk) 17:08, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

You are Autoconfirmed: [2]. If you click on Contributions, then scroll to the bottom there are options to view your contribution summaries (User Rights, Edit Count, etc.). S0091 (talk) 17:26, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks! It doesn't mention it in User rights, but it does in the link you have sent to me, so i am. It seems a little weird to me that i was not informed that i am autoconfirmed, but now i see it i am sastified Thanks again for the help!Enivak (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Ahh, you are correct about user rights. It appears things like Extended Confirmed or other rights that are granted (like Admin rights, Pending Changes Reviewer, etc.) display there. Yeah, I am not sure why a notification is not generated when you gain rights so you just have check manually. S0091 (talk) 18:18, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, i agree the system wants some development about these. Nevertheless, thanks for informing me, because i had no idea about the website on the link you have sent to me. Enivak (talk) 21:16, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Enivak! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 16:22, Tuesday, June 25, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

A minor sonata

Coming over from my talk: What do you think of a table of movements such as in Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56? There's {{music}} for some notations. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Hey Gerda, thanks for coming in my talk page, now it will be more easy for me to reply to you! About your suggestion, it is not a bad idea, but this type of this list is a summary of many, big and complex movements. The Sonata in A minor has not many nor big nor complex movements, so it is preferable in the sub-headings to be given more information rather than numbering. If it was a greater work, I would follow your suggestion. Enivak (talk) 19:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

(Note: I liked the template, I will use it)Enivak (talk) 19:32, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
86		Automotive industry in Brazil (talk)	Add sources
325		Automotive industry by country (talk)	Add sources
50		Barkas (van manufacturer) (talk)	Add sources
8		Paul Greifzu (talk)	Add sources
10		TACO Faurecia Design Center (talk)	Add sources
179		Wiesmann (talk)	Add sources
54		Suzuki Gixxer SF (talk)	Cleanup
125		Alfa Romeo 6C (talk)	Cleanup
34		Magna Powertrain (talk)	Cleanup
818		Automotive industry in India (talk)	Expand
362		Alfa Romeo Giulietta (940) (talk)	Expand
2,387		Automotive industry (talk)	Expand
26		Covenant Chain (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
13		Motorcycle saddle (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		Glas 1700 (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
70		SML Isuzu (talk)	Merge
112		Swaraj Mazda (talk)	Merge
37		Fiat Industrial (talk)	Merge
226		Hesketh Racing (talk)	Wikify
160		Westland Helicopters (talk)	Wikify
25		Rolls-Royce 30 hp (talk)	Wikify
3		Jack Catley (talk)	Orphan
3		TVS One Make Championship (talk)	Orphan
3		Syed Asif Ali (talk)	Orphan
397		KTM 200 Duke (talk)	Stub
14		Rudrapur, Uttar Pradesh (talk)	Stub
14		Alfa Romeo New York Taxi (talk)	Stub
10		Bijendra Pal Singh (talk)	Stub
44		Equity Bank USA (talk)	Stub
200		TVS Apache RR 310 (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:31, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, Wq. 132, H 562 has been accepted

Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, Wq. 132, H 562, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 09:01, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		Keep up the great work! S0091 (talk) 14:03, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Ahh, thank you very much, @S0091:! I didn't waited something like that, to tell the truth, i am suprised (with the good meaning!) Because there is currently a mini-issue about the article's title, i needed that. You are really one of the best here! Wishing the best, Enivak (talk) 10:52, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Enivak! You created a thread called Question at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Help me! (2)

Dear wikipedia administrators, I do not know if I should use the help desk instead, but I think my problem is closely related with you. I have noticed 2 things:

1) I am not am administrator neither a rolbacker, but for some reason, when I see the most recent edit in an article, I nevertheless see the 3 rollback buttons ([rollback (AGF)], [rollback] and [rollback (VANDAL)]). I have never used them. As I know that rollback and it's ecuilevants are dangerous in the wrong hands, what means that I nevertheless see them?

The image displays the buttons I see

2) https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec/en.wikipedia.org/Enivak says that I have also an account in the Indian and Uzbekistan wikipedia, but I have never interactions in them. One day I suddenly see a welcome message from the Indian wikipedia. The only other wikipedia that I have interactions is the greek one, as I have done some edits there (if we except other Wikimedia projects, but again only using their English version.) Again, what to do? I await your reply,

Enivak (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

• Have you recently activated Twinkle? If you don't know what that is, then the answer is no. 331dot (talk) 17:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: Yes (I proposed a merge with it) Enivak (talk) 18:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay, so the additional links you refer to are part of Twinkle. They essentially provide the same user rights as the rollback user right, but without needing to ask for it. 331dot (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: Thanks! Your opinion about question 2? I never did anything in these wikis to trigger that. (and something more: now I can rollback without being a rolbacker? I will never use this but I'm just asking) Enivak (talk) 18:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

I think I know that answer but I am not entirely confident in it, so I will leave this open for another administrator. 331dot (talk) 18:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: Thanks! Your opinion about question 2? I never did anything in these wikis to trigger that. (and something more: now I can rollback without being a rolbacker? I will never use this but I'm just asking) Enivak (talk) 18:29, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

As for question 2, you do not need to do anything. When you create an account, by default it is a global account. It means your user account is automatically created across all Wikimedia sites. For more information, please see m:Help:Unified login. Mkdw ^talk 18:45, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mkdw: Thank you. I knew that, but how is explained the welcome message from the Indian wiki? Also, the link does not say all wikis, it just says the projects I did the edits and these two. Enivak (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

The tool only lists accounts where there has been some activity (a wiki you have visited, edited, or someone has edited your user space). By simply visiting hi.wiki, the system recognized your account and left you an automated welcome message. For example, I went to check your user talk page on hi.wiki (which was the first time I have ever visited hi.wiki). It instantly it left me a welcome message on my user talk page. Regardless of the accounts listed at the tool, your account exists on all wikis. Mkdw ^talk 19:06, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

@Mkdw:Ok, But I had never visited these wikis (especially the Uzbekistan one-i had visited the Indian one only after they snd me a message to see what was that) (by the way, sorry if I am boring) Enivak (talk) 19:14, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion

Hi. Please remember that tagging an article for speedy deletion is effectively asking an admin to 'delete without process'. If we are to do that, it has to be clear-cut (unambiguous). Let's look at Wiima, where you specified 3 different criteria. That you need to specify 3 criteria suggests either you're just hoping at least one will stick, or you don't understand the criteria - so let's examine each criterion with respect to the article in question:

• A1: This applies to articles lacking sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Example: "He is a funny man with a red car. He makes people laugh." If any information in the title or on the page, including links, allows an editor, possibly with the aid of a web search, to find further information on the subject in an attempt to expand or edit it, A1 is not appropriate. - I typed "Wiima microcar" into Google and came up with numerous non-Wikipedia hits including this: https://www.allcarindex.com/main-index/car-make-details/Finland-Wiima/
• A3: This applies to articles consisting only of external links, category tags and "See also" sections, a rephrasing of the title, attempts to correspond with the person or group named by its title, questions that should have been asked at a noticeboard, chat-like comments, template tags, and/or images. - Not applicable. The article is short, but it has prose beyond a rephrasing of the title.
• G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion - It's hard to see what's being promoted, as the vehicle was a prototype from the 1950s!

The article has existed since 2007 and doesn't meet the speedy deletion criteria. Give it due process - propose deletion using Template:Prod, or send it to WP:AFD. (I've done the former). Thanks for reading! --kingboyk (talk) 16:59, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

@Kingboyk: Dear user, thanks for notifying me! The truth is that i knew the meaning of these criteria, but I was a little thoughtless on applying them, I apologize for consuming administrator's time because of my fastness. I will say that I did it and on other micro-stubs like that, I will go to correct my mistake. After your description, I understood that A1 and A3 did not apply to that. About the G11, I will agree that it is an old prototype (there is not reason to promote it), but the mention that it was a <<true microcar>>, does it seems a little? Again, sorry for creating a mini-mess, Eni vak (speak) 21:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

(Note: I see you have fixed them, thanks!) Eni vak (speak) 21:38, 11 August 2019 (UTC)

Humber Limited

Did you have any particular news in mind? Eddaido (talk) 01:35, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

@Eddaido: Dear user, thanks for asking me. The truth is that the article in some points does not say that he company was defunct (when it should), and it says that some subsidiaries are still active were they clearly are not. Eni vak (speak) 12:26, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, you are clearly more up to date about Humber Limited than I am. Please amend the article to suit you (with cites) and if I should dispute anything I can come back to you. Thanks, Eddaido (talk) 12:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Ok, I am working now on some drafts, when I finish them I will come to it. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 12:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Chetsford (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		For excellent work on several music-related articles Chetsford (talk) 22:27, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@Chetsford: Dear user, thanks for granting me the tool, and thanks for the kindness you have by giving me a barnstar! I will try not to dissapoint you and the community, and also be helpfull with it. I will also be carefull untill i completely learn it. About the music article, User:Gerda Arendt must also be congratulated. Again, thanks for all!! @Zwerg Nase: @S0091:

Good stuff, Enivak! S0091 (talk) 23:20, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Your Teahouse Question

Hi there, as a Teahouse host, I do apologize that your question wasn’t answered by an experienced editor. I will do my best to answer it now. In a WikiProject there is no leader. Every member has an equal share in the project. There are, however, coordinators who have no more power than anyone else but are there to organise drives or events. I appreciate your willingness to revive the WikiProject and I am happy to support you in that. That being said, you are still a developing editor (just as I am) meaning an endeavour this large will definitely be challenging. Editors back in 2013 have already created the project page, which helps hugely. Could you direct me to the page which explains reviving a WikiProject, so that I can explain it to you the best I can. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:19, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Willbb234: Dear user, thanks for your kind words! Now i understood that there is no leader. The page i said was that:Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Guide#Dealing_with_inactive_WikiProjects (the paragraph under that). It says how to in generally simple words, but for some reason this still seems to me a little puzzling. Also, i would like to ask something more: How can i become a coordinator? I await your reply, Eni vak (speak) 09:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Also, i agree that it will be difficult, but i would like to give it a try. Eni vak (speak) 10:27, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, definitely worth giving it a go! Coordinators are generally nominated through a consensus from the members of the project. Coordinators are there to organize events, especially in large WikiProjects, but, as the WikiProject isn't even active, I don't think there is a need for any coordinators yet. I will head over to the WikiProject and write a little introduction detailing how there are a couple of editors willing to revive the project, and ask for any other help if it can be given. If you would like to help out, then please do reply and we can work together to see what we can do. Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 14:12, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Yes, i will surely help out,@Willbb234:! As i can see we will be the lone active members for now, i want to help you with administration. I am coming! Eni vak (speak) 14:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

I see you recently accepted a pending change to September 16 that did not include a direct source.

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the content guideline and the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and un-accepted this edit and backed it out.

All the pages in the Days of the Year project have had pending changes protection turned on to prevent vandalism and further addition of entries without direct sources. As a pending changes patroller, please do not accept additions to day of year pages where no direct source has been provided on that day of year page. The burden to provide sources for additions to these pages is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

@Toddst1: Dear fellow recent changes patroller, thanks for mentioning to me my mistake and reverting it. I will be more cautious en the future, and probably i will avoid such articles until i understand what's going on. Thanks again, Eni vak (speak) 14:01, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the response - all good. Keep up the great work! Toddst1 (talk) 14:34, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Comment by IP

(This was copied from the original section) Hello. Are you a human being, or a dumb bot? And if the former, then what is the crazy reason for this stupidity: "Reverted 2 spam pending edits by 85.140.223.7 to revision 905260735 by Polylerus" https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shades_of_brown&oldid=911401936 If perchance you do not know what HSV is or how it's calculated, you could have used Wikipedia to educate yourself. And if you believe that Wikipedia is somehow better off displaying WRONG values to the world, then at least do explain yourself. 31.13.16.106 (talk) 05:42, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I have replied to your talk page. Eni vak (speak) 10:06, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello again. Your reply is one more example why me not having a login on this site is the right idea. As to your threat, a saying about "threatening a hedgehog with your bare behind" comes to mind. It is you, not I, who find whatever reason to engage in the rat race of Wikipedia "community"; me, I'm doing whatever few edits I do only to fix errors, spending extra bit of my time to help other people. If that is not welcome here, it is not I who will be at a loss. 31.13.16.106 (talk) 11:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I have saw your complain to Chestford.

I am more than willing to resolve that issue, but ONLY if you try to maintain an small civility (i must agree that the message you have sent me now is more calm, but i am sure you can do better. :-)) Now, again to the original topic: i have not threaten you, i never did that on no one. Sorry if you felt so (maybe i also must correct my tone). If you still feel that way, you can post here a part of my reply that seems threatening so we can discuss about that. I never "find whatever reason to engage in the rat race of Wikipedia "community"; (your words); i fell i even can't understand what this means. If you refer to the tool (pending changes reviewer), i was given access to it after a fair request. I do not want to be "the master of wikipedia"; i want to contribute constructively, creating articles and fixing errors (much like you). About the edit: maybe i was in error, as i do not know about colors. In other circumstances, i would have tried to avoid that article, but i found that you added many times in many places a website (https://toolstud.io/). This maybe wasn't your intent, but wp:spam describes exactly that. So, i reverted it according to policy. If that website was better than the former, tell it to me and i will accept my error. (footnote: if you are here to promote that website, please disclose it). I am also an new editor, i was an IP before creating that account, so i can understand your position. Again, i am not here to do harm to new users; i feel sad you think so. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 15:38, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

The "rat race" characterization is because I had my run-ins with deletionists some long time ago. As an engineer I never understand and totally dislike the kind of people who derive their self-worth from destruction instead of creation, but as I do not have a plethora of time to waste on wikiwars of attrition, the IP-only edits are the compromise; they do not present a juicy target for anyone looking for who to annoy. I do apologize for mistaking you for another one of the said kind.

As for the website in question, it was just what the redirects from the former one have finished at - i.e. an updated link to the same place. And the only reason I put them there at all, was that looking at the rest of the article, I thought such links were required as proof that HSV triple is indeed correct. :-) If they aren't, you can drop them whatsoever (and as the erroneous-HSV-with-a-link demonstrated, their presence does not prove anything anyway :-)). 85.140.216.108 (talk) 20:32, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Firstly, thanks for calming now. Now you that you are calm, everyone wanna be happy to communicate with you and improve the site. I think that even you feel better now you calmed down :-). I am sad that some wikipedians had not been civil to you (as you in your first sentence); i state that i am from the people that hate them also. I accept your apologies, as i stated before, i am not from the people willing to annoy to gain things, their target being IPs (like you)or registered. The only thing that can prove that an HSV triple js correct is an WP:Citation. An spare website (like the one in my version) does not prove anything, as you say. Your explanation about the link you provided has resolved my concerns about the link itself (if theese things you say are the truth); the think that caused the revert was that you added multiple times; your explanation on that also sastifies me. Now that you know that adding a link many times seems like spam, you should consider adding links ONLY when appropriate. If these HSV triples you added were correct, please feel free to re-add them, and if you want to put that website, you are free to replace the old with the new one. If your edit has all that requirements that i mentioned, i will be the first to support accepting it. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 21:23, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Hello Enviak

Enviak, I saw that you reverted me. I removed the chunk out of the page because it had nothing to do with Fram, and as that page was set up to be about Fram, ,it was very much out of place. I moved it over to the talk page to preserve that conversation. I see you restored it. Can I ask your rationale for that ? Necromonger...We keep what we kill 21:37, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

@Wekeepwhatwekill:Dear user, thanks for your edit. As i agree with you, i saw that Winged blades of godric reverted your adition at the page's talk page, so the content got lost. So i reverted you and it got in the page again. My apologies if i was wrong, through i am not in blame for their revert. As i have only once did a comment in the case and i am an new editor, i do not want to get involved, this was an act of fastness as i have the page on my watchlist. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 21:43, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Enivak! You created a thread called About the Wikipedia:WikiProject Requested articles at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

2019 Pacific hurricane season

Please stop reverting others' updates of storm intensities unless they are inconsistent with the NHC website. Check the website first.--Jasper Deng (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

@Jasper Deng: Dear user, thanks for notifying me. I will refrain from checking that page. Best regards, Eni vak (speak) 09:12, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes right

Hello, Enivak,

Please be more careful with your pending changes right and do not revert other edits simply because you do not like them. Remember to accept changes, not just revert them. This right is to reduce vandalism and if the edits are legitimate, please simply accept them. This is a right that can be removed and perhaps you are too new of an editor to be entrusted with this right. Be cautious but fair. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

@Liz: Dear user, thanks for your helpful and calm warning. The truth is indeed that i am faster than i should be, but i do not revert edits just because i don't like them. I truthfully apologize for any mess that i have created (your tone suggests that i am the center of discussion inside administrators, which in turn suggests that i have created an really big problem). I will refrain checking some pages that need caution (eg. the one one other user says in the previous section), and double-check what i do. I feel that the option of removing the tool from me is a little too-much for now, but if you (the admins) decide that it must, i will abide by it. And, indeed, i am a little new for that, but i think i can given a second chance (through difficult, i maybe have passed the limits). Again, sorry for adding an unnecessary burden to administrators, Eni vak (speak) 09:07, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

(about your revert on the requests: the edit says " She is an incredibly influential statistician and researcher...". I do not doubt that this woman is indeed important, but that phrase doesn't seem a little promotional (for request)?) Eni vak (speak) 09:10, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paraguayan War

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Paraguayan War you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 10:40, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Articles about Greek Industry

Καλησπέρα και ευχαριστώ θερμά. Η αλήθεια είναι ότι τα άρθρα (εκατοντάδες σελίδες) τα έγραψα ως ενιαία κείμενα, και η μόνη πηγή ήταν ουσιαστικά η έρευνά μου, όπως παρουσιάζεται στις δημοσιεύσεις μου. Είναι πραγματικά μη πρακτικό να επιχειρήσω να βάλω inline citations, όσο και αν αυτό είναι τυπικά πιο σωστό. Σας ευχαριστώ και πάλι, και είμαι στη διάθεσή σας για οποιαδήποτε περαιτέρω συζήτηση. Με εκτίμηση, Skartsis (talk) 17:14, 29 August 2019 (UTC)

@Skartsis: Γειά σας και πάλι, και συγνώμη που άργησα να απαντήσω. Θα ήθελα να ξανατονίσω οτι θαυμάζω την δουλειά σας. Καταλαβαίνω απολύτως οτι δέν είναι πρακτικό, οστόσο, χωρίς τα inline citations, γίναιται πάρα πολύ δυσκολο να επιβεβαιωθεί οτι Όντως οι πληρωφορίες έρχωνται απο την δοσμένη πηγή, με αποτέλεσμα να είναι ανάγκη να αλλαχτει/σβηστει (μπορεί να βάλουν κάποιον άσχετο να άλλάξει το άρθρο, ο οποίος στην ουσία να βάλει λανθασμένες πληροφορίες απο κακές πηγές, κάταστρέφοντας την δουλειά σας).

Θα ήθελα να ομολογίσω οτι ούτε εγω ξέρω την λύση στο πρόβλημα, οστώσο πιστεύω ότι ένα inline citation ανα παράγραφο θα άνέβαζε κατα πολύ την αξιοπιστία των άρθρων. Υπάρχουν αρκετά άρθρα τα οποία έχουν αυτο το πρόβλημα (π.χ. Paraguayan War, το οποίο έχει το ίδιο πρόβλημα 30 φορές μεγσλύτερο. Οστώσο, έχει επήσης πολλά inline citations και έτσι δέν επηρεάζεται τιποτα). Με τον μεγαλύτερο σεβασμό, Eni vak (speak) 22:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC) ]]

About User talk:Sapianus 2

Hi Enivak,
Still looking into what is going on there. Is there a user account matching Sapianus 2 on the Greek language Wikipedia?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@Shirt58: Hello, and thanks for the question. I don't know if this sock has edited the Greek wikipedia, Although i know that it's master, Sapianus, had vandalized Meta, the Pontic and the Latin wikipedia, and he uses the same IP with me (this is the reason why i was hardblocked in the Latin wiki, althrough i was unblocked later). Could launching an checkuser help? Eni vak (speak) 12:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, Wq. 132

On 12 September 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, Wq. 132, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that C. P. E. Bach's Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, composed around 1747 for flauto traverso without bass and printed during his lifetime, is one of the few significant pieces for solo flute? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sonata in A minor for Solo Flute, Wq. 132), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

valereee (talk) 00:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you for a week for creating a blatant sockpuppet, as  Confirmed by checkuser. Please do not do this again Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:35, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

User has engaged in subsequent block evasion in late September, as 188.73.194.74. Any further instances may result in an indefinite ban under WP:3X. The soonest this user can now apply under WP:SO is 2019-03-22. --Yamla (talk) 17:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Continued block evasion via 188.73.244.148. As warned, I am now noting this user is banned under WP:3X. --Yamla (talk) 15:57, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Paraguayan War

The article Paraguayan War you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Paraguayan War for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CPA-5 -- CPA-5 (talk) 09:01, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process

Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)