Jump to content

User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 11

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5←Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13→Archive 15

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betty Holzendorf has been accepted

Betty Holzendorf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Help

How do I unlink something in a template? For example at the bottom of Jess Lee (Malaysian singer) is a template for a show (I want to be a singer or some such..) and in the template one of the "Substitute singers" links to James Li, but it is the wrong James Li.

I see the V, T, and E buttons but while "Edit this template" pops uo when I click the E I don't know how to make it let me edit the template.

FloridaArmy (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Click the E and the window comes up. You can change it and publish. Legacypac (talk) 23:51, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Doesn't work fpr me. The edit this temple message pops up but I'm.not able to click on the message or edit the template. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Weird. What do you want changed exactly? I'll try to do it. Legacypac (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gonzelle White has been accepted

Gonzelle White, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Excellent. Thank you. I'm not sure why this subject was so difficult to get approved. I hope it is expanded going forward by those who.have better access to archival sources than I do. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Essentially I did a Google Books search on the topic and thought "well if this was AfD I'd !vote 'keep', so I'm passing this". Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:08, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Hopefully Draft:Freddie Crump will also make it into into mainspace soon. FloridaArmy (talk) 18:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Woman in 47 (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:43, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Freddie Crump has been accepted

Freddie Crump, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

——SerialNumber54129 20:51, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Anthony Variclé has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anthony Variclé. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 18:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Goulac has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Goulac. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Goulac has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Goulac. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 22:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
User:RoySmith I tried to work it up a bit but I am pretty far out of my comfort zone on it. Hopefully in mainspace someone woth some expertise / experience will improve it. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Coe Glade was submitted in a weird way; here's is the decline message.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 22:18, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Goulac has been accepted

Goulac, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 22:19, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Local, USA (February 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
There's only two sources, and one isn't independent.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 17:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hal Wilson (actor) has been accepted

Hal Wilson (actor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Milowent • hasspoken 17:42, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chunnenuggee Ridge Public Garden has been accepted

Chunnenuggee Ridge Public Garden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 20:32, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Squab Farm has been accepted

The Squab Farm, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:35, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks. Seems a pretty interesting subject to me. A 1918 play about the film indistry. One source suggests it had a role in establishing the term "chick" to refer to attractive young women. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: George Foster Platt has been accepted

George Foster Platt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:51, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Kyrle MacCurdy has been accepted

James Kyrle MacCurdy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 07:18, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Sutton

Please give me a few hours to finish. Thanks. deisenbe (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm done now. deisenbe (talk) 20:58, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
You can put an inuse or underconstruction template in articles you're working on so you have time to work them up free of interference. Just out {{inuse}} or {{underconstruction}} at the top of the page. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:09, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Special Secretariat for Policies to Promote Racial Equality has been accepted

Special Secretariat for Policies to Promote Racial Equality, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:07, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chamberlain Brown has been accepted

Chamberlain Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 02:54, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
center of African-American
business and culture
... you were recipient
no. 1862 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: W. H. Slaughter House has been accepted

W. H. Slaughter House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 14:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Capouya has been accepted

John Capouya, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:29, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Towns County High School has been accepted

Towns County High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:30, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hiawassee High School has been accepted

Hiawassee High School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:34, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Francis William Sullivan has been accepted

Francis William Sullivan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: William Manly King has been accepted

William Manly King, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:51, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglas Duer has been accepted

Douglas Duer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:52, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Laura Newbold Wood has been accepted

Laura Newbold Wood, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 17:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tula Belle has been accepted

Tula Belle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:02, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Velguth has been accepted

Frederick Velguth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Otto Strack has been accepted

Otto Strack, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bert Angeles has been accepted

Bert Angeles, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:09, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick A. Thomson has been accepted

Frederick A. Thomson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 18:11, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walking on Air (1946 film) has been accepted

Walking on Air (1946 film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mariano D. Papy has been accepted

Mariano D. Papy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

-- RoySmith (talk) 23:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Moncrief Springs has been accepted

Moncrief Springs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:00, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aveling Ginever has been accepted

Aveling Ginever, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:01, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music Hall Parade has been accepted

Music Hall Parade, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Slaves Today has been accepted

Slaves Today, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guy W. Currier has been accepted

Guy W. Currier, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 03:07, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit-warring on One America News Network

Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:05, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Snooganssnoogans, while you do a lot of good editing this problem with you misrepresenting what's in sources is unfortunately not new. In this case you have repeatedly reverted to "In October 2017, the channel said without any evidence that a "report" had been published which showed "U.K. Crime Rises 13% Annually Amid Spread of Radical Islamic Terror"." Not only does the source not say "without any evidence", it says the Office of National Statistics (ONS) included statistics on offenses recorded by police in the 12 months ending in June 2017 showing that between July 2016 and June 2017, police recorded a total of 5,156,928 offenses in England and Wales, an increase of 583,782 offenses (12.77 percent) from the number recorded between July 2015 and June 2016, which was 4,573,146. Please stop misrepresenting what is in sources. There should be no place for dishonesty and POV pushing on Wikipedia. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:13, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
I suggest you actually read the sources (and this is certainly not the first instance where you fail to do so). No one is disputing that crime increased. What's entirely false is that crime increase has any connection to islamic terror. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 14:17, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

BabyKids

Thanks for the reverts. If in the future you see similarly named BabyKids accounts, do not hesitate to report them at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ghso ehwj. Raymie (t • c) 18:52, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Johnny Hudgins

Notice

The article Johnny Hudgins has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. MensanDeltiologist (talk) 14:39, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

I have moved it to draftspace which is where I had meant to create it. Sprry about that. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:40, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Woman in 47 has been accepted

The Woman in 47, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:01, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kichesippi Beer Co. (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 22:29, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
User:SamHolt6 what subject are the numerous cited sources about? FloridaArmy (talk) 22:33, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
@FloridaArmy: the sources cited are indeed about the brewery in question; however, the same sources do not convince me the subject meets WP:NCORP as none are in-depth enough to establish the subject's notability. For example, NCORP is clear that routine business announcements (such as announcements about a business moving to a new locale) are not detailed enough to confer the needed notability on a subject. Add to that the citing of two blogs (not WP:RS), the (to my counting) four broken links, the fact all of the coverage is highly regional (and thus treading on WP:GEOSCOPE), and the previous, NCORP-based AfD outcome lead me to decline the article at this time. Best.--SamHolt6 (talk) 22:45, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First Lady of Florida has been accepted

First Lady of Florida, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 04:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gypsy O'Brien has been accepted

Gypsy O'Brien, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

K.e.coffman (talk) 06:59, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wares Creek has been accepted

Wares Creek, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–Ammarpad (talk) 11:52, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hotel Californian (San Francisco, California) has been accepted

Hotel Californian (San Francisco, California), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Florida Sentinel has been accepted

Florida Sentinel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Denver Ferguson has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Denver Ferguson. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Special Secretariat for Policies to Promote Racial Equality

Hello, FloridaArmy,

Thanks for creating Special Secretariat for Policies to Promote Racial Equality! I edit here too, under the username StraussInTheHouse and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Hi, just leaving a note about this article that I've reviewed, most of the sources seem to refer to the NCPRE which advises the SSPPRE.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|StraussInTheHouse}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

SITH (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, FloridaArmy/Archive 11. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emma Bell Clifton has been accepted

Emma Bell Clifton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Milowent • hasspoken 21:03, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • LOL, this one is a bit of a pickle. Emma Bell Clifton was Wallace's spouse, and the screenwriter. Apparenly their daughter Emma was the actress. Have cleaned it a bit but have a crack. Daughter was married (for a time?) to a Bucci.--Milowent • hasspoken 21:24, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Milowent, hmmmmm. Sorry about the confusion. According to IMDb, which I realize is not a reliable source, Emma Bell Clifton was an actress and screenwriter who went by Emma Bell. And her daughter seems to have gone by Emma Clifton. Do we know when they were married? Did they continue to use maiden names on screen? FloridaArmy (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
No worries, the confusion arises from the source materials, some of which are also confused on the matter. There are actually separate IMDB entries for the mother (Emma Bell Clifton)[1] and daughter (Emma Clifton)[2] but they are not immediately obvious as different people. I would guess the daugther was born in the mid-1890s, so if she was around 20 when the 1914 film with Chaplin came out, that's totally plausible. If the mother was a film actress, I'm not sure, but the short obits I found just reference her being a screenwriter. The daughter was married to Marcello Bucci by the time of her mother's death, and then divorced him in 1933. I'll see if I can't find more on the daughter.--Milowent • hasspoken 22:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Morgan Padelford (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hell in a Bucket was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hell in a Bucket (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick Morgan Padelford has been accepted

Frederick Morgan Padelford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks, Hell in a Bucket. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: S. Brainard Sons has been accepted

S. Brainard Sons, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Voceditenore (talk) 13:35, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Hi FloridaArmy. Me again. You have created hundreds of successful articles and have extended autoconfirmed user rights. You do not need to go through the AfC process unless you are writing on a topic in which you have a conflict of interest. That is clearly not the case with this one, and I would imagine with most if not all of the articles you have created. The AfC process is very dicey. Many of the reviewers don't have a clue about notability guidelines for more niche topics like 19th century publishers, and they aren't good at evaluating sources either. I'd suggest you simply draft the article in your own user space, and when you think it's ready move it directly into article space yourself. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 14:37, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks User:Voceditenore!!! Unfortunately, I have an editing restriction requiring me to go through the arduouss AfD process. I was punished for creating to many short stubs on notable topics. Also banned from Afd which is sad because I helped save a lot of notable entries. Craziness, but it is what it is. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
It might be time to appeal that restriction, my overall opinion is the vast majority of your articles while not Michael Jackson style notability is filling in several important areas that are needed. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 17:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Maybe. The issue was that I created a stub when I came across a notable subject. Apparently the consensus is now that entries have to be worked up before they are allowed in mainspace. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Ah, I've just read the background to your editing restriction at ANI. The restriction was probably a good idea at the time. For better or worse, it is an increasing trend on Wikipedia to restrict editors who are producing large quantities of problematic stubs and then more or less walking away from them to go on to another one. I know of several cases like this. One editor was even site-banned for it, but in that case it had been going on for 7 years. Anyhow, if you do need advice or evaluation on any of your drafts, just give me a shout. In a few months, you might want to consider appealing the restriction as Hell in a Bucket suggests. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 17:10, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks. I view the absence of an entry on a notable subject as more of a problem than an "incomplete" stub, but indeed the consensus seems to have moved in a direction requiring substantial workup. Draft:James Ramsey Murray needs help if he interests you. Thanks again. Take care. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
I've added a source with a lot of biographical information and formatted the other refs to make them clearer. There should be plenty there to expand the article. In biographical articles. it's really important to make them biographies, i.e. write about the person's life rather than simply stated what they did. He sounds like a very interesting person. Voceditenore (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camp Bryan (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
This submission appears to be taken from nccbi.org/NCMagazine/2004/mag-04-04tht.htm. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. SITH (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Osborne has been accepted

Samuel Osborne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 19:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hugh Hurd has been accepted

Hugh Hurd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 00:47, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Hill Burial Park (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma) has been accepted

Rose Hill Burial Park (Oklahoma City, Oklahoma), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 00:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Lenny Mendonca has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lenny Mendonca. Thanks! Otr500 (talk) 12:00, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

What do you think about AIs on Wikipedia?

Hi FloridaArmy,

It looks like you are an experienced New Page creator. Thanks for all your contributions! I saw your post on Teahouse, so I wanted to reach out. Are you interested in participating in a short interview to share your thoughts about how Wikipedia AIs should work? It would only take about 15-30 minutes over phone or video chat.

I am working in collaboration with Wikimedia Foundation staff to do this research, so if you decide to participate, your opinion could directly help build the future of Wikipedia. I’m personally contacting only a small handful of Wikipedia editors, so please let me know if you are interested or have any questions. Hope to talk to you soon!

Best, Estelle, aka FauxNeme (talk) 16:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

PS. You can learn more about our study here.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Douglass High School (Oklahoma City) has been accepted

Douglass High School (Oklahoma City), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Equitable Pictures

User:Lord Cornwallis I see you're doing super work on Rayart Pictures. Equitable Pictures also needs help if you are so inclined. Keep up the great work. I had trouble posting on your talk page so am dping so here.. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:58, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Franklin Building (Chicago) has been accepted

Franklin Building (Chicago), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: H. J. Goetzman has been accepted

H. J. Goetzman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 12:53, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alabama Presbyterian College (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roland McMillan Harper has been accepted

Roland McMillan Harper, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 21:12, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pinguicula caerulea has been accepted

Pinguicula caerulea, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank O. Weary has been accepted

Frank O. Weary, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 05:10, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bounds Crossroads has been accepted

Bounds Crossroads, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 01:42, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hastings M. Robertson

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hastings M. Robertson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 16:12, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

He was a Native American lawyer. Reportedly first to graduate from his law school. Served as a county level, I believe, judge. I couldn't find a lot about him. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alabama Presbyterian College has been accepted

Alabama Presbyterian College, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 01:59, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgia Sothern has been accepted

Georgia Sothern, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:51, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Edward Morrissey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Edward Morrissey. Thanks! — Stevey7788 (talk) 12:47, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
User:Stevey7788, article for all three subjects linked already exist. I believe a redlink is allowed for a notable subject already covered in an existing article. Why would we redirect the name of a director of several notable films or an editorial writer at The Week to the section of an article on a religious institution where a minister of the same name is covered? FloridaArmy (talk) 12:49, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darrell Foss has been accepted

Darrell Foss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Morrissey (director) has been accepted

Edward Morrissey (director), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Morrissey (disambiguation) has been accepted

Edward Morrissey (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Thanks very much. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nelson Evans (March 22)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by StartTerminal was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Nowhere near notable. Searching the exact name yields obituaries of random people.
startTerminal {haha wow talk page | waste_of_space#4023 on discord} 04:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! startTerminal {haha wow talk page | waste_of_space#4023 on discord} 04:45, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
@FloridaArmy:@StartTerminal: I disagree with the rejection of this topic, and so have contributed to the article and moved it to the mainspace (at Nelson Evans) without going through the auspices of WP:AFC. If notability concerns persist, AfD is now the proper venue. SamHolt6 (talk) 06:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Wow! Great work. Thanks, User:SamHolt6. FloridaArmy (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Olinka

We generally don't create articles for mispellings, and this is almost certainly one. There's on Olinka. It could refer to Olin, Poland, river Volyňka in Czech Republic, island and the town of Wolin, or who knows what. It's ok to add such a placename to a Wikipedia article, with a footnote saying it is a mispelling. But again, mispellings don't warrant articles. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:33, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Schaub (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stevey7788 was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please see WP:LIBEL and WP:POV. The article appears to be heavily biased against the subject and is not from a neutral POV. The entire article criticizes him and does not give a balanced view of his life and career and notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Stevey7788 (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
The entry includes an article and statement noting Schaub's position. We use what's in reliable independent sources. Investigators found he acted improperly in two high profile cases. FloridaArmy (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gallegher (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Richard Hardin Davis. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
This stub draft does not really contain enough information for a stand-alone article.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 18:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond High School (Richmond, Virginia) has been accepted

Richmond High School (Richmond, Virginia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— Stevey7788 (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:FloridaArmy/Archive_11&oldid=893723682"