Jump to content

User talk:Gaijin42/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

Neutral notification

You previously voted, opined, commented, or otherwise took part, at Template talk:Succession box#RfC. Please see a related discussion at Template talk:Infobox officeholder#RfC Congressmen's tenures in infobox. Kraxler (talk) 15:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015

Please comment on Talk:Roger Scruton

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Roger Scruton. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

ANI question

I think you meant Landmark Worldwide instead of Legacy Worldwide. John Carter (talk) 22:32, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Brian Harvey

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Brian Harvey. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:

Hi Gaijin - like all of us, I'm sure you're pretty busy, but maybe you could answer my question on Talk:Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism? My comment said: But the source also specifically discusses that culpability could be increased. Since no examples of circumstances are provided for either, they would seem to cancel each other out as a sort of hedging of bets. Can you be clearer about how you'd like to concisely get across the document's point here? - that people arguing that acting on an innate orientation isn't sinful are wrong because the action is the result of free choice? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:08, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

OH, FYI: I have that talkpage watchlisted, so no need to ping me. I just pinged you because I didn't know if you were watching it or not; let me know if it's unnecessary! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:31, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
I have it watched, but I have many many things watched, so its helpful to bring my attention to something thats directed straight to me. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:50, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
OK, great! –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:56, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Oh, and thanks for catching the Watergate mention at Manhattan Declaration; I've removed it repeatedly in the past, but it must have got back in when I wasn't paying attention or got fed up. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:27, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
I responded to you on the talk page the other day... –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 19:59, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015

Could You have a new look

Could You have a new look at the LB (car ferries) please. And if possible could You be so kind to remove the "essay" stuffs at the top. CheersBoeing720 (talk) 00:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Please specify which sources that should be self made !? Please Boeing720 (talk) 01:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

To be clear, I am not saying they are made by you personally, but that they are not published by reliable sources.
http://www.faktaomfartyg.se/ is the personal website of Mike Asklander
http://kommandobryggan.se/ is the personal website of "Mats"

Gaijin42 (talk) 01:11, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

What's wrong with those sources then ? They appear to be large collections, including photos. It's also strange how You change the topic of complaint from time to time. Boeing720 (talk) 01:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Specificate, please !

You just cannot throw "possible shit" on any article where English sources are difficult to find. And You must most certainly specify what You "fear" is unsafe. Here - or in the article. I ask You humbly once again. Boeing720 (talk) 01:31, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

It has nothing to do with sources being in english. It has to do with being a WP:RELIABLESOURCE. the two websites you have used in the article are clearly WP:SELFPUBLISHed as they are personal websites of random individuals. We have no idea if they are accurate or not. If there are books, magazines, documentaries or newspaper articles published about the topic those are the type of source wikipedia prefers and in many cases requires. The tags on the page are to warn people that those are not the type of sources used in the article, so they should be cautious about relying on the information there. That is all. I don't see much humility in your statement. You you cannot discuss the issues in a polite manner, you may not post on my page any more. Gaijin42 (talk) 01:58, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Micke Asklander & www.faktaomfartyg.se

www.faktaomfartyg.se must indeed be concidered as a good source http://www.sjofartstidningen.se/bloggar/sjofartsbloggen/antligen-flyter-fakta-om-fartyg-igen/ Here is even an large article in "Sjöfartstidningen" (The Seafaring News[paper]). His site is better than many books. Boeing720 (talk) 02:07, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality/Evidence. Please add your evidence by February 2, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Christianity and Sexuality/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Courcelles 09:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks !

Although I must admit to have felt some frustration by Your thorough criticism on the LB (car ferries) article, in retrospect I can now say that it helped to improve the article. I don't concider it "a masterpiece" but atleast better than it else would have been. Please note, this is honnestly ment. Cheers Boeing720 (talk) 22:41, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

Please comment on Talk:Aamir Khan

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Aamir Khan. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Acupuncture, RfC

Hi Gaijin42! Re recent edits at acupuncture, I don't know if you saw the RfC/A at Traditional Chinese medicine which was about how to cite the Nature editorial: Talk:Traditional_Chinese_medicine#Result. I'm not at all sure that we need to cite their comments on drugs and herbs since the article isn't about those topics. Happy editing. --Middle 8 (contribs • COI) 01:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Scott Walker (politician)

He is the sworn enemy of all I hold dear. All the more reason that I should exert the utmost self-discipline in making sure his article is edited with true impartiality. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Orangemike all the reason why it is more appreciated as well. Gaijin42 (talk) 03:15, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:War on Terror

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:War on Terror. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

ip block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gaijin42 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

For reasons unrelated to wikipedia, I am using some VPN/Proxy software (https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/) which is sometimes putting me into some blocked IP ranges. Can I get the IP block exempt flag please? I am able to turn off the proxy, but this interferes with other work I am doing and then i am unable to edit at the same time. Note that this is not an "open" proxy, but one that requires authentication and payment to use. Gaijin42 (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Current block thats hitting me is :Editing from 162.253.128.0/22 has been blocked (disabled) by Elockid for the following reason(s):

Decline reason:

As far as I can tell, you're not currently blocked. PhilKnight (talk) 22:11, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I don't see why not, but the instructions say to check with a Checkuser to verify the need, so I will ping Materialscientist who I believe is online now. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

JohnCD, Materialscientist ? Gaijin42 (talk) 15:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Elockid Gaijin42 (talk) 16:08, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


PhilKnight I was IP blocked, my VPN dynamically assigns me an IP, some of which are blocked. I am asking for Wikipedia:IP block exemption Gaijin42 (talk) 23:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

Please comment on Talk:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:13, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Johann Hari

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Johann Hari. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Homosexualitatis problema

What do you think of the concrete non-hypothetical proposal that Wikipedia should say that the letter states that homosexual sexual activity by homosexual persons is not always entirely compulsive and inculpable?

(By the way, as you already know, I am not convinced that the letter does speak of occasions "when" (not just an "if") homosexual activity by homosexuals is the result of deliberate choice. It rules out the idea that there is never even an atom of responsibility, the idea that the activity/behaviour is "always and totally compulsive". I suppose one can argue that this implies there are occasions when the activity is indeed deliberate, but I think the letter does not actually state that. We can perhaps agree to disagree on that question.) Esoglou (talk) 21:49, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

It does more than imply deliberate (having ruled out compulsive, the alternative is what?), but perhaps you meant to say "implies not deliberate". Gaijin42 (talk) 21:57, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. That explains the problem. What the letter rules out is that the activity/behaviour is "always and totally compulsive". What alternative is there? For one, that the activity/behaviour is sometimes totally compulsive and so not at all deliberate. For another, that the activity/behaviour is always partially compulsive and so not fully deliberate. It rules these out no more than it rules out that the activity/behaviour is on some occasions not at all compulsive and is instead the result not just of choice but of deliberate choice, a statement that it makes no more than it makes these two, or others. Esoglou (talk) 07:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
I thought your reply was to what I put in parenthesis, but perhaps it was (also) in response to my main question. I won't bother you further. Esoglou (talk) 20:29, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Please comment on Talk:Helena Blavatsky

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Helena Blavatsky. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

Please comment on Talk:Ryukyu Kingdom

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ryukyu Kingdom. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Still Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism

Still hoping to hear your response to my question, when you've got the time. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:13, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I've put in the text that we worked out, but hit me up on the talkpage if there are further changes you think could be made to it. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:46, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blue

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Blue. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Please comment on Talk:Christian terrorism

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Christian terrorism. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lizabeth Scott

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Lizabeth Scott. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Multi-sport events

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Multi-sport events. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Granny (orca)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Granny (orca) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:21, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

Your GA nomination of Zombie star

The article Zombie star you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Zombie star for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Ṫ Ḧ the joy of the LORDmy strength 13:46, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Very upset

I just finished reading the 100 page Ferguson Police Department Report [1]. Oh boy, all I can say is that I am terribly upset after reading it; it is inconceivable that that kind of policing is happening in 21st century America. And to think that these patterns of police behavior were the context of the altercation resulting in that tragedy, oh-my-god. I have removed the article from my watchlist because there is no chance in hell I can remain calm and have a civil conversation about "nuances". I'll rejoin the discussions there when I regain some composure. - Cwobeel (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes, there is quite a bit to be upset about in that report. But also many things can be true at the same time. The patterns in Ferguson could be (are) horrible (including perhaps even actions by Wilson in general, or perhaps even in the initial stages of the encounter where he was hassling them for jaywalking/walking while black) while simultaneously the Brown events (while absolutely tragic) being justified by someone who just robbed a store, assaulted the owner, and then assaulted a cop as backed by multiple witnesses and evidence. Its pretty clear here that the initial media narrative was very far off, and its going to take effort to overcome the cognotive dissonance for those that are invested in that narrative to deal with the real facts and evidence - you are in good company. The stories are not mutually contradictory. Perhaps A contributes to B in some way, and certainly A contributes to the mistrust/reaction by the wider community. But there is no actual conflict there. Take a break if you desire, we will be waiting for you when you get back :)
I don't believe the narrative was off; not after reading that report. Whatever happened, at least it has brought these issues up to the surface and there may hope for the necessary changes for a better future for Ferguson's residents and similar communities. In one sense, I see both Brown and Wilson as victims of an extraordinarily fucked up system that was staked against both of them. A tragedy indeed. - Cwobeel (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Robbery in Michael Brown Case

The use of the word "allegedly" is justified, as Brown was never convicted of the convenience store robbery. Whatever 'consensus' drew the conclusion that he was the perpetrator is irrelevant, and to suggest otherwise is journalistically unsound. JoyGrenade (talk) 20:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alawites

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alawites. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Walter O'Brien. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

Granny (orca)

Do you wish to respond to my comments in the Granny (orca) GA review? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:21, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (idea lab). Legobot (talk) 00:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Mohale Dam

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mohale Dam. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:34, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

.

Please comment on Talk:Morisco

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Morisco. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration case opened

Pursuant to section 3a of an arbitration motion, you were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. Please note: being listed as a party does not imply any wrongdoing nor mean that there will necessarily be findings of fact or remedies regarding that party. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 14, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:57, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration Case Opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Evidence. Please add your evidence by April 7, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Collect and others/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Robert McClenon (talk) 20:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon (talk) 20:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC) Robert McClenon I send an email to the arb list, about if I was permitted to participate in the case, now that the scope has expanded to include Gun Control (from whence I am topic banned). Do you know if a reply is being formulated? Gaijin42 (talk) 22:05, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

The Committee have received your email and we are discussing it. Thryduulf (talk) 22:42, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

No longer a party

Hi Gaijin42, you have been removed from the Collect and others arbitration case by an arbitrator. Accordingly, your evidence size limit is now 500 words and 50 diffs, and you will no longer receive notifications about this arbitration case. For the Committee, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 13:08, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

GPTF

Just curious if you've caught wind of the project modification going on to compartmentalize the Gun Politics articles into their own Task Force? There's a discussion here. The idea is to give the articles there own area similar in nature to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Maritime warfare task force and the WP:GGTF in principle, thus let the main project focus on scholarly technical and historical articles that is predominantly covers. I'm getting ready to message each of the active project members to ask them to read the proposal and comment if they'd like. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 04:55, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

I am aware of it, but I'm fairly sure such a project would be covered by my topic ban, so I am not participating. Gaijin42 (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
My apologies, I didn't realize yours was indefinite. --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 20:20, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Good article nominations. Legobot (talk) 00:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Religion. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

Your GA nomination of Granny (orca)

The article Granny (orca) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Granny (orca) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cwmhiraeth -- Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:41, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Happy Easter! Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 17:01, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Taylor Swift

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Taylor Swift. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film. Legobot (talk) 00:11, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

Please comment on Template talk:Freenode

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Freenode. Legobot (talk) 00:14, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

American Politics 2 arbitration evidence phase closing soon

As a listed party to this case, this is a notification that the evidence phase of this case is closing soon on 14 April. If you have additional evidence that you wish to introduce for consideration, it must be entered before this date. On behalf of the committee, Lankiveil (speak to me) 01:59, 12 April 2015 (UTC).

Walter Scott pre-RfC

We're not going to get any NPOV-expert opinions at WP:NPOVN, so it's looking like an RfC starting tomorrow or Saturday. We're doing some pre-RfC, would you care to take a look? Especially the BACKGROUND SUMMARY. ―Mandruss ☎ 20:08, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Committed identity

I noticed you got a committed identity. I've seen these before and wondered why a person might get one and whether it would have any value for me. Why did you get one, and why now? (if you don't mind sharing) Lightbreather (talk) 16:41, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Lightbreather I've had the identity for some time actually (I added it after I stumbled across some admin who had one), I just added the PGP key tho. In most circumstances the value of the identity is negligible, its just a way to prove that you are the owner of the account if it gets hacked or whatnot. PGP is more useful, as it allows me to a) send messages that are signed in a way that anyone can confirm were really from me (or at least from whoever posted that key), and b) allow others to encrypt messages to send to me that only I can read. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:28, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

I have added a section on the Kng v Burwell re mandates

I have gone into some detail on why it is incorrect to,say that the mandates would be "overturned" if King is reversed. Fewer people would be subject to the individual mandate (affordability exemption) and the employer mandate coild only be enforced against employers those with employees living in states with their own exchanges. I'll await further discussion before addressing this subject again. KennethJohnKelly (talk) 00:31, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

Recommendation?

As it seems you are an expert on this, what EDC spring assisted knife would you recommend? (small, light, and durable) - Cwobeel (talk) 21:22, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Cwobeel The main difference between them (besides aesthetics, blade shape, etc which are personal preference) is how the spring mechanism works. Everyone has their own patented one. I've used two, Buck_Knives' and Columbia River Knife & Tool's I highly prefer CRKTs. Buck's is a coiled spring, and I've had to send it in for repair twice for getting gummed up/broken. Fortunately Buck has an unlimited lifetime warranty for that kind of stuff.

CRKT's is literally just a bent piece of metal from the frame putting pressure against the blade. The back of the blade is shaped so that when the knife is closed, the pressure is holding it shut, but as you open it the bar slides across a curve on the blade and eventually the angle switches to pushing the knife out. I suppose eventually it will break off from metal fatigue, but in the meantime, its foolproof and maintenance free.

The one I carry every day is a CRKT Vertex [2] unfortunately it has been discontinued, but can still be found at some sporting goods stores inventory. Any CRKT knife that uses the "Outburst" assist should work the same way (and it should be easy to see visually that it works that way).

Like I said past that is personal preference on blade size/shape, if you want serrations or not, if you want fancy wood or engraving, etc. I personally think serrations are wasted unless you know ahead of time you are going to be mainly cutting cords, because they reduce your cutting surface, make it impossible to carve, and are much harder to sharpen. Blade shape is a whole big discussion on its own with the right answer probably being "it doesn't matter for 99% of tasks, and if it did matter, you already know enough to chose correctly" Gaijin42 (talk) 21:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

BTW, other knife makers out there all have something similar, Gerber has assisted openers etc,. I just don't have any personal experience with their tech. They may be just as good or even better. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:02, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
The CRKT Vertex 1040 is just the size and style that I was looking for. On ebay for less than fifty bucks. Thanks for the info! [3] - Cwobeel (talk) 22:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Now if you get a proper sharpener, serrations are easy! (I like the products from Spyderco and WorkSharp for sharpening and have an article due out in the next isue of OFF GRID dedicated to sharpeners). If price is not a factor, I like the assisteds from Kershaw and Zero Tolerence. ZT approaches a custom knife in terms of steel quality, fit and finish and other materials, but not price, although they are pricier than the basic production models. If price is a factor go with CRKT, I have 2 of the Onion assisteds (don't remember the names, but they were gifts from Ken and very close in design to his customs) and reccomend them highly.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:10, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Just ordered the CRTK, $33 at http://www.mytoolsforyou.com/ - Cwobeel (talk) 22:14, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Cwobeel As Mr Grey found out (or would have found out?) the laws on these knives are somewhat arbitrary and vary from place to place. Don't take this knife to New York City (or ANY locking pocketknife for that matter, even if it isn't an assisted opener). Double check your cities laws to make sure you aren't going to get busted. That said, I've never been questioned about it anywhere. Also in some states any knife in the pocket counts as a concealed weapon, so you may need to get a carry license depending on your local jurisdiction. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Good points, thank you for the warnings... - Cwobeel (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Just checked, it is against my local laws to carry it on my pocket or clipped to my belt, but OK if I carry it on my tool bag. Go figure. In any case, my use is for my hobby, and I can carry it on my tool bag. - Cwobeel (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Mike_Searson, yes, serrations are not difficult to sharpen with the right tools and skills, but you have to admit its a lot harder than "slide it across this piece of metal/rock a few times". I lusted after a WickedSharp system for a while, but decided I couldn't justify it. I like Ken's stuff. I tried to convince my wife to let me buy the onion Shun chef's knife but she wasn't having any of it for $200+. But I'm on the waitlist for a custom Skookum camping knife tho that she doesn't know about ;)Gaijin42 (talk) 22:19, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
Wicked Edge? I would not reccomend them to anybody, aside from their attitude, for that price you can get a belt grinder! Ken's WorkSharp sharpener is reasonably priced and you can add a tool head to do axes, chisels, etc for around $70. The Shun knife is amazing, I got mine for $70 at the factory about 10 years ago as a closeout. But yeah, I like serrations on some knives although the one I carry the most is an Emerson MV-3 (Viper 3) and its a zero bevel chisel grind with no serrations.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
I have several CRKT knives that I use for work and day to day chores, but I love, love, love my Ken Onion edition Kershaw. I shopped around and got a fairly good deal on it. It helps that I wanted the Tanto blade, combo straight edge with serrated section. Not a popular choice, so plenty of them around. Personally I prefer Tanto blades for shear practicality that there is more metal than a drop point so you'll more sharpenings thus longer life. My 2 cents... --Scalhotrod (Talk) ☮ღ☺ 02:02, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I guess I opened a can of worms . I have been reading online on the subject, and was not aware that there is such a universe of knives, and so much interest and passion about them. Amazed. - Cwobeel (talk) 04:21, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Cwobeel did your knife come yet? Gaijin42 (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. Got an email from the warehouse saying that it is discontinued and they refunded me. Trying my luck on eBay... - Cwobeel (talk) 17:20, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice of SPI

I don't believe I am required to do it, and I do not take pleasure in doing it, but I am here to notify you that I have started an SPI against you. Lightbreather (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Gaijin42, is this evidence as ridiculous as it looks? Viriditas (talk) 06:57, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Utterly ridiculous. - Cwobeel (talk) 14:29, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Lightbreather I'm quite disappointing in this. I categorically deny that the people in question are me, and I thought we had largely moved past our issues. the fact that you recently accused someone else of also being godsy is a sign that are just lashing out without any actual evidence. Your continual position that anyone who disagrees with you, or shares a common interest is either a sock or part of a cabal is one of the core reasons you are in the situation you are in.
I had largely refrained from piling on into the ArbCom, providing only 3 pieces of evidence that I thought were important and that would not be covered by others, and 2 of them defended you. On the other elements, I have held back out of sympathy for your situation. This is a decision I am now strongly reconsidering. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
Gaijin, I am surprised to hear that you were a sockpuppet. You seemed so nice. It was clever of you to have no connections whatsoever to your sock. Heh. Very clever. Capitalismojo (talk) 21:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Capitalismojo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_O_2CSL_RY - I just clicked on your user page, and it says you live near Madison. I can see the capitol building from where I sit. Where are you? Gaijin42 (talk) 21:22, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
That sneaky sneaky always cracks me up. - Cwobeel (talk) 21:46, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
I have an office on the west side, but today I am downtown heading to the capital starbucks on MLK/Main. Capitalismojo (talk) 16:32, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Capitalismojo Ping me when you are there, I'll stop by for a cup and a meet and greet. I'm just over in the US Bank building on the corner. Gaijin42 (talk) 16:36, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Lego Elves

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Lego Elves. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Advisement

The Marilyn Mosby article has been edited (more like an edit war) between two anonymous users. Since you have been involved with the Gray article, I recommend taking a look at it as the two are highly opinionated and may have caused damage.TheGracefulSlick (talk) 01:28, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I like how if someone posts factual information that is not in step with you personal politics it gets branded an "edit war" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.118.199 (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

Please comment on Talk:Free will

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Free will. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Human Right Self Defense

Why did you delete my updates on the Human Right Defense? It was screwed up already. I wasn't finished with updates and, you are wasting my time. - AI6PG https://holmesiv.wordpress.com/2015/01/21/administrative-details-for-the-human-right-of-self-defense/ 

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ai6pg (talk • contribs) 00:29, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Ai6pg My ability to comment on this is somewhat limited due to a sanction placed against me, but your addition was not encylopedic. I happen to largely agree with you politically (probably), but wikipedia needs to be written in a neutral fashion, and with WP:RELIABLESOURCES backing the content. a random wordpress blog is not reliable, and the information added was added in a non-neutral, editorial/opinion blog style. In general the right of self defense argument is covered throughout the article, in particular the section on blackthorn. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Due to the sanction against me, I will not comment further on this issue/content, but if you think something is missing in the article, please build WP:CONSENSUS for it on the article talk. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Identity theft in the United States

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Identity theft in the United States. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Workshop page

Please see my comments on allegations of outing both under Mike V's section and the workshop's talk page. And note that you can't add new evidence at this stage to the case. Allegations of outing should normally be dealt with via email to avoid drawing attention. Doug Weller (talk) 18:10, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Doug Weller I have emailed you for some clarification. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:02, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Reverted edit re 1321, Kng v Burwell

I've explained the reason for my change on the King v Burwell talk page.kjkelly (talk) 21:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

spi in arbcom

[4] look in box when to request checkuser and there is a box about possible socking during arbitration..it states "Request on the arbitration case pages that a checkuser be run." I explained this to GW and on the SPI page. I requested GW told me it was better suited to spi...i can dig that up if you'd likeHell in a Bucket (talk) 22:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Here is is [5] Hell in a Bucket (talk) 22:41, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Female copulatory vocalizations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Female copulatory vocalizations. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

Please comment on Talk:Newfound River

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Newfound River. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

American politics 2 arbitration proposed decision posted

Hello. The proposed decision for the American politics 2 arbitration case, which you are listed to as a party, has been posted. Thank you, --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Data comparison

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Data comparison. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Palestine grid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Palestine grid. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Change from announced time table for the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case

You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the AN or AE discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list. The drafters of the Arbitration enforcement arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the Evidence phase will close 5 July 2015, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close 26 July 2015, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted 9 August 2015, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Humanistic Buddhism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Humanistic Buddhism. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 15 July 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Advocacy ducks

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Advocacy ducks. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

Please comment on Wikipedia:Education noticeboard

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Education noticeboard. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Bodycams to Commons

Did you give up on this? Or thinking about it indefinitely? If either, I completely understand; was just curious as to status. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Mandruss Didn't give up completely, but I've been busy at work, and the way I used to pull vidoes off of youtube doesn't work anymore, so I have to find a new one and I'm lazy :) Gaijin42 (talk) 22:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:VPT would likely help. Or WP:RDC, since it's not strictly a Wikipedia technical issue. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Gaijin42, I'm pretty good with that stuff. What do you need? A tool to download YouTube videos? A tool to take screenshots? What OS do you use? - Cwobeel (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
@Cwobeel: As I read his comment above, he needs a tool to download the YouTube videos, hopefully low-loss. He then plans to upload them to Commons, as discussed here. And if I had to guess, he seems like Windows kinda guy to me. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, I am in windows 10. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

(OT) Brave soul. How do you like it? What did you upgrade from? ―Mandruss ☎ 00:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
8.1, but I had been on the preview for several months. Gaijin42 (talk) 01:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

I searched for download youtube videos windows and picked the first hit. Using that I got Kidd's video in 360p .webm format for 145MB. When played using Firefox's imbedded player, the frame is smaller than at YouTube, but it's usable and I don't see any loss of quality. I don't know whether the Commons player will use a larger frame. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

There you go... - Cwobeel (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Grand Theft Auto V

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Grand Theft Auto V. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

Please comment on Talk:Buddhism and violence

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Buddhism and violence. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Bodycams to Commons

Did you give up on this? Or thinking about it indefinitely? If either, I completely understand; was just curious as to status. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:59, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Mandruss Didn't give up completely, but I've been busy at work, and the way I used to pull vidoes off of youtube doesn't work anymore, so I have to find a new one and I'm lazy :) Gaijin42 (talk) 22:03, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
WP:VPT would likely help. Or WP:RDC, since it's not strictly a Wikipedia technical issue. ―Mandruss ☎ 22:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Gaijin42, I'm pretty good with that stuff. What do you need? A tool to download YouTube videos? A tool to take screenshots? What OS do you use? - Cwobeel (talk) 00:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
@Cwobeel: As I read his comment above, he needs a tool to download the YouTube videos, hopefully low-loss. He then plans to upload them to Commons, as discussed here. And if I had to guess, he seems like Windows kinda guy to me. ―Mandruss ☎ 00:26, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Indeed, I am in windows 10. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:40, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

(OT) Brave soul. How do you like it? What did you upgrade from? ―Mandruss ☎ 00:57, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
8.1, but I had been on the preview for several months. Gaijin42 (talk) 01:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

I searched for download youtube videos windows and picked the first hit. Using that I got Kidd's video in 360p .webm format for 145MB. When played using Firefox's imbedded player, the frame is smaller than at YouTube, but it's usable and I don't see any loss of quality. I don't know whether the Commons player will use a larger frame. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:00, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

There you go... - Cwobeel (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

If you could give me specific and detailed guidance on the rationale, I could give this a shot. But that might be harder than doing it yourself, I know. ―Mandruss ☎ 19:33, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

Mandruss

Rationale? Gaijin42 (talk) 19:41, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright rationale. I'm a novice when it comes to anything that's not own work or PD. ―Mandruss ☎ 19:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

Please comment on Talk:Learning To Drive

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Learning To Drive. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bochasanwasi Shri Akshar Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Waldorf education

Thanks for responding to the RFC. Would it be possible for you to give one or two examples of the improper use of non-independent sources? And perhaps one or two examples of phrasings you'd like to see improved? Thanks. HGilbert (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Heavy metal music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Heavy metal music. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Community portal. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

Please comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Planned Parenthood 2015 undercover videos controversy. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

Please comment on Template talk:Current disaster

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Current disaster. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Is this a good one?

Still looking for a replacement. Is this a good one in your opinion? [6] - Cwobeel (talk) 21:09, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

I have not used it myself, but Kershaw is a solid brand, and Ken Onion is one of the most respected designers in the business. When we were discussing this before Mike Searson gave the kershaw onion assisteds a thumbs up, so I'd say you are fairly solid. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:17, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Very good. Thanks. - Cwobeel (talk) 21:26, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Oh, so may choices... I prefer a blade shape like this one: [7] but that is pricey...- Cwobeel (talk) 21:49, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Lol. Its a matter of perspective. just wait till you are addicted. Anything under $100 starts looking cheap. Note, that knife does not have the assisted open. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:53, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
I will go to a local shop so that I can check them in person. Hard to decide from a photo not being a cognoscenti like you. - Cwobeel (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

So what is this class of knife used for? It doesn't look much good for fishing, carving, or combat. Whittling? ―Mandruss ☎ 22:50, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

General utility. Can be used for hunting or fishing, but there are probably better dedicated choices. Since I've started carrying (about 15 years now) I find a use for it probably every other day that normally id be running to the silverware/utility drawer, or macguyvering a paperclip or something. I have probably 10 knives that I swap out depending on what I think im doing that day, or what I'm wearing. sometimes for value (don't take the expensive ones where I might lose them) sometimes for looks, sometimes for function (take the skeletool if I might want screwdriver or pliers) etc. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:54, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
I use it for my hobby. Very useful to have on you when you need a knife that can be opened with one hand. - Cwobeel (talk) 23:04, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
I carry this in my bag [8] but sometimes all you need is a simple, sharp knife to do the job. - Cwobeel (talk) 23:07, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding you

Hi Gaijin42, the Arbitration Committee has proposed a motion in response to the amendment request you filed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Callanecc I realize that there is a good deal of drama going on elsewhere in the wiki, but are you aware of anything delaying progress on this motion? So far it seems that my appeal is considered rather uncontroversial, so I think its probably just people getting distracted. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
The motion has passed. For the Arbitration Committee, Miniapolis 01:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
Miniapolis Thank you, could you please update Wikipedia:Editing_restrictions with the suspension to avoid any confusion? Gaijin42 (talk) 01:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Vested contributors arbitration case opened

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 01:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Vested contributors retitled Arbitration enforcement 2

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. For this case, there will be no Workshop phase. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz Read! Talk! 12:28, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gaijin42/Archive_3&oldid=1125488069"