User talk:LikamboisaacK

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Keliko people, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless used with permission. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 16:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adaway Dusman (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curbon7 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adaway Dusman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curbon7 (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LikamboisaacK! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curbon7 (talk) 18:06, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Iwatuku (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iwatuku and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:09, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Joseph Mawa has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Joseph Mawa. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 07:44, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Toti (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Toti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 18:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Toti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jacob Toti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:15, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Toti (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Since you were the only editor who had moved this to and from Draft previously I am justified in sending this back to draft.

I am not persuaded that Toti is notable. He is not a politician, so WP:NPOLITICIAN does not apply. He is simply an appointed official.

Your job is to show that he passes WP:BIO

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jacob Toti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 17:17, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Likambo Isaac Moro

The article Likambo Isaac Moro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability per WP:GNG or WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 00:44, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kembe Boma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kembe Boma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:09, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Andiga the Great

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Andiga the Great, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:51, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Andiga the Great moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Andiga the Great, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Currently, neither source mentions this person. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:58, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Andiga the Great

Draft:Andiga the Great, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Andiga the Great and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Andiga the Great during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Fram (talk) 16:49, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Odravu Sub-County, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Nile. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aluma Zamba

The article Aluma Zamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Two of the sources do not appear to even mention him. The other two both have a single, brief mention. Can't find enough in-depth coverage to show that he meets WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Odravu Sub-County moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Odravu Sub-County, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:38, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karubanga Jacob has been accepted

Karubanga Jacob, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Greenman (talk) 08:43, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odravu Sub-County (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NGEO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odravu Sub-County and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kembe Boma (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kembe Boma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 18:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuma Sebastian (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuma Sebastian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Menstrual Health and Hygiene in Refugee settlement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Menstrual Health and Hygiene in Refugee settlement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.wvi.org/clean-water-sanitation-and-hygiene-wash/menstrual-hygiene. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk) 20:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Mawa (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Joseph Mawa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 11:09, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As we now south Sudan has no many main stream media to publish more article due to its current status I don't know how you can support the little information we get on the available sites LikamboisaacK (talk) 19:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

Good evening , how are you doing today Cadet Mukobelwa (talk) 18:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuma Sebastian (December 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

At least 4 of the source appear to be just reposts of the same article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuma Sebastian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jacob Toti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacob Toti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacob Toti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bearcat (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Escape Village Yumbe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Escape Village Yumbe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 12:20, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Escape Village Yumbe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Escape Village Yumbe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escape Village Yumbe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mr Lengs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Won.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wuji Payam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wuji Payam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:23, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Lengs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mr Lengs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:50, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hi LikamboisaacK, I just wanted to give you a heads up that when adding infoboxes to articles, they should be placed at the top of page, before the introduction per WP:LAYOUT. I've already fixed all of them for you, so you don't have to worry about going back and fixing them. I wanted to reach out incase you seen the edits and wondered why I was making them. Cmr08 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks LikamboisaacK (talk) 04:17, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yuma Sebastian moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yuma Sebastian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rocky Jay

Hello, LikamboisaacK

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username VickKiang, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Rocky Jay, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

VickKiang (talk) 23:37, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes the article has one reference sour

But the truth is South Sudan doesn't have many mainstream media house that publish Articles so if we get one that's is the only one we relay on

How do you plan to address such challenges of limited mainstream media LikamboisaacK (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Queen Zee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Queen Zee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Zee. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:45, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky J moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rocky J, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:47, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Village 10 Bolomoni moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Village 10 Bolomoni, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:31, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to delete an article but you should always understand there is no enough mainstream media website who can published all the articles and the one you see are the only ones LikamboisaacK (talk) 13:26, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Welcome LikamboisaacK!

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Connecting

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you would like to chat with other editors, you can join the Wikimedia Community Discord server. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions.

Happy editing! Signed, Rs chen 7754 04:27, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Atoroba Peni Rikito (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:King Atoroba Peni Rikito and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have cited at least source from a mainstream media website to the article and further more with the challenges of Limited mainstream medias in South Sudan and having Admin who are not familiar with the local history I think Wikipedia needs to address such issues to copy up with other places that have limited or no mainstream media.

I accepted with the ideas of declining the article

Thanks LikamboisaacK (talk) 07:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i mean I don't accept the idea of declining the article because of no reliable source LikamboisaacK (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Zee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Queen Zee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is the reason for moving the article when others the source are cited and I call all Admins to first cross check and see it's source which are cited and remember South Sudan have limited mainstream media and it's also good an admin with South Sudan could be selected to verify the local articles which other people outside our location are not familiar with instead think that it's not true or does not have reliable source LikamboisaacK (talk) 12:22, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wani Francis moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Wani Francis, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:39, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fula Rapids (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Significantly out of date, no indication of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fula Rapids and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morgan Heritage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Lloyd.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Luka Deborah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Luka Deborah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:46, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Queen Zee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Queen Zee, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not return to mainspace without addressing the UPE/COI concerns.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:16, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky J moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rocky J, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atoroba Peni Rikito (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Azande Kingdom. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough independent notability for Rikito at this point. Recommend redirect to Azande Kingdom.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atoroba Peni Rikito and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mantani moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mantani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:41, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panyabu (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tails Wx was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source 3 is unreliable. Draft also needs expansion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Panyabu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tails Wx 18:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zone 4 Bidibidi Refugee settlement moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zone 4 Bidibidi Refugee settlement, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mr Lengs (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xclusivzik was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mr Lengs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Xclusivzik (talk) 05:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Queen Zee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Queen Zee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen Zee (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:14, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mr Lengs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mr Lengs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mr Lengs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

KH-1 (talk) 10:09, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Trisha Cee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trisha Cee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trisha Cee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:30, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wudabi

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wudabi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iwatuku

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iwatuku, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yavu Clan of Keliko

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yavu Clan of Keliko, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lasu payam yei (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majash2020 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lasu payam yei and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majash2020 (talk) 07:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wudabi

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wudabi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iwatuku

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iwatuku".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lual D'Awol moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lual D'Awol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:54, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yavu Clan of Keliko

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yavu Clan of Keliko".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing / promotion

Hello LikamboisaacK. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Runway Waiiters, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:LikamboisaacK. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=LikamboisaacK|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Odravu Sub-County

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odravu Sub-County, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kembe Boma

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kembe Boma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Likambo Isaac Moro

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Likambo Isaac Moro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wuji Payam

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wuji Payam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Joseph Mawa Okuba

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Joseph Mawa Okuba, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of Morobo County Commissioners

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Morobo County Commissioners, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Odravu Sub-County

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odravu Sub-County".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kembe Boma

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kembe Boma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:50, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wani Francis

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wani Francis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Likambo Isaac Moro

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Likambo Isaac Moro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:11, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wuji Payam

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wuji Payam".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Mawa Okuba

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Mawa Okuba".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:18, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Morobo County Commissioners

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Morobo County Commissioners".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:44, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Yuma Sebastian

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Yuma Sebastian".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 12:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atoroba Peni Rikito

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atoroba Peni Rikito, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mantani

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mantani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Yei - Kaya Road

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yei - Kaya Road, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Village 10 Bolomoni

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Village 10 Bolomoni, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mr Lengs

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mr Lengs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lual D'Awol (September 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Lual D'Awol may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:16, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Rocky J

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rocky J, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zone 4 Bidibidi Refugee settlement

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zone 4 Bidibidi Refugee settlement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rocky J

Hello, LikamboisaacK. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rocky J".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Crazy Fox

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crazy Fox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:49, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok

Thanks LikamboisaacK (talk) 07:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request to know and learn how I can make my edits sound non promotional

Dear @Rosguill i would like to to know the reason I was blocked and how can I make my edits and articles created not sound promotional. Honestly I have not been paid or hired to write an article since I joined Wikimedia and I’m willingly readily to learn and admit my mistakes

thanks LikamboisaacK (talk) 22:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's two issues here.

One is the several COI/UPE inquiry requests that you can see on this page that you have not addressed. You have consistently chosen to edit topics that are highly prone to UPE, and have done so without sufficient regard to policies and guidelines concerning neutrality and notability.
Second is the disingenuous citation work. In Special:Diff/1166620280, you cite this book. The problem is that this reference makes no mention of Dynamq at all and does not support that claim that it was attached to. At a glance, it looks like you tried to inflate the subject's notability by putting in a fake citation to a good-looking source.

You can appeal your block by following the instructions in the template above, and another admin will review your request.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:21, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Admins,

I understand that my edits have raised concerns regarding conflict of interest (COI), undisclosed paid editing (UPE), and neutrality. I sincerely apologize for any mistakes I made in this regard, and I now fully understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines closely. I would like to address these concerns and explain my actions.

1. Paid Editing and Conflict of Interest (COI): I would like to clarify that I have never been paid or hired to write any articles on Wikipedia. My edits were made in good faith and without any financial compensation. However, I now understand that even without financial compensation, editing topics where I have a personal interest can still be seen as a conflict of interest. In the future, I will avoid editing such topics unless I make the appropriate disclosures according to Wikipedia's paid editing policy.

2. Neutrality: I now understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoiding language that can be interpreted as promotional. I will ensure that all my future contributions strictly adhere to Wikipedia's neutrality policy, presenting only factual, verifiable information without bias.

3. Citations and Verifiability: I realize there was an issue with my citation in a previous edit, where I cited a source that did not support the claim being made. This was a mistake, and I take full responsibility for it. Moving forward, I will ensure that all my citations are properly verified, and that every source I use directly supports the content of the articles.

4. Commitment to Improvement: I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, notability, verifiability, and conflict of interest, and I am committed to adhering to these policies strictly in all my future edits. I am also willing to review and correct any of my previous edits that may have been problematic.

I hope you will consider my appeal and give me an opportunity to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia. I am genuinely interested in improving my contributions and making sure they align with Wikipedia’s core policies.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

LikamboisaacK LikamboisaacK (talk) 09:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lual D'Awol

Hello, LikamboisaacK. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lual D'Awol, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

LikamboisaacK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admins,

I understand that my edits have raised concerns regarding conflict of interest (COI), undisclosed paid editing (UPE), and neutrality. I sincerely apologize for any mistakes I made in this regard, and I now fully understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines closely. I would like to address these concerns and explain my actions.

1. Paid Editing and Conflict of Interest (COI): I would like to clarify that I have never been paid or hired to write any articles on Wikipedia. My edits were made in good faith and without any financial compensation. However, I now understand that even without financial compensation, editing topics where I have a personal interest can still be seen as a conflict of interest. In the future, I will avoid editing such topics unless I make the appropriate disclosures according to Wikipedia's paid editing policy.

2. Neutrality: I now understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoiding language that can be interpreted as promotional. I will ensure that all my future contributions strictly adhere to Wikipedia's neutrality policy, presenting only factual, verifiable information without bias.

3. Citations and Verifiability: I realize there was an issue with my citation in a previous edit, where I cited a source that did not support the claim being made. This was a mistake, and I take full responsibility for it. Moving forward, I will ensure that all my citations are properly verified, and that every source I use directly supports the content of the articles.

4. Commitment to Improvement: I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality, notability, verifiability, and conflict of interest, and I am committed to adhering to these policies strictly in all my future edits. I am also willing to review and correct any of my previous edits that may have been problematic.

I hope you will consider my appeal and give me an opportunity to continue contributing constructively to Wikipedia. I am genuinely interested in improving my contributions and making sure they align with Wikipedia’s core policies.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely, LikamboisaacK

Decline reason:

We don't consider AI written requests(92% certain according to zeroGPT). You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write your request in your own words without the aid of an AI. AIs cannot capture the specifics of your situation, which is what we are interested in. I will clarify one thing- it is not a conflict of interest for you to edit topics that you are merely personaly interested in, that's what everyone does. If you have any form of connection to the subjects of your edits, beyond mere interest, now is the time to say so. 331dot (talk) 10:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to unblock, 13 October 2024

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

LikamboisaacK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Admin After a while of careful reading and considerations I have finally come to understand that my edits have raised concerns regarding conflict of interest (COI), undisclosed paid editing (UPE), and neutrality. I sincerely apologize for any mistakes I made in this regard, and I now fully understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s guidelines closely. I would like to address these concerns and explain my actions., I am so sorry for having broke this policy just as many other policies that I now fully understand, I would like to clearly state that i was not paid to edit any article but did it out of the intrest i have not knowing due to luck of neutrality it made me to make the above mistakes, I deeply regret my actions and see for an unblock and make sure that from this time I fully commit to citing reliable sources, that mention the content I’m writing about, write and edit articles without conflict of interest and apply neutrality, I make sure that also focus on writing more accurate content on wikipedia, like doing more research on topics that I am interested in, and also making sure that I preach the same to the people I interact with, my lose taking of these policies is something i fully regret I also came to understand even other way amazing safeguarding policies like the General friendly space policy for our Wikimedia events, and how even beyond the editing we should treat each other with respect and professionalism, dear Admin, I have fully understood and I am asking please help Unblock me to continue my wikimedia Journey, thanks so Much Likamboisaack

Accept reason:

I initially didn't want to unblock myself because this may be seen as a conflict of interest, but I see that no one else is replying, so I'll go for it. I trust that the user understands the mistakes and will be more careful. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 16:26, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like apologize for the mistake i have made and would like to say after carefully reading the Wikipedia policies i have understood and will follow it when editing. last i would like to clearly state that i was not paid to write the above article but did it out of interest

Once again I'm really sorry

Thanks LikamboisaacK (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored your first request, prior requests may not be removed until the block is removed per WP:BLANKING. 331dot (talk) 13:04, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok

Thamks LikamboisaacK (talk) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I support the request to unblock. I am an administrator, so I have the right to unblock, but I am not doing it because of a possible conflict of interest: I am working with this user on trying to set up a Wikipedia in his language. I trust that this user understands the problems with his past edits, and will not repeat them on the English Wikipedia. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]