User talk:Luizpuodzius/Archive (2011 to May 2016)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page John Searle has been reverted.
Your edit here to John Searle was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://apertum.110mb.com/library_09/Strawson-Meaning-and-Truth.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Naked girl dancing. Very interesting. She is probably on top off a table[edit]

File:Nude standing female body.jpg


Luizpuodzius (talk) 16:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)Dr Loo 00h08min de 14 de agosto de 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a question about how much should the Wiki show...and I beleive that this kind of conversation is valide.

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Barnstar of Diligence
Cool Luizpuodzius (talk) 05:18, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited The Toucan Piracyzation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blogger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henrique Pizzolato, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paraná (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 10 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Augusto Sagnotti was accepted[edit]

Augusto Sagnotti, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e deckertalk 02:45, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artificial atom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

Per WP:MEDRS we typically use secondary source such as review articles rather than primary sources. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:05, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drums for Rancas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quechua. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contribution to Speciation article[edit]

Dear Luiz

You added the following sentence to the Speciation article (Heading Darwin's Dilemma):

However, findings, published in the journal Current Biology, resolve "Darwin's dilemma": the sudden appearance of a plethora of modern animal groups in the fossil record during the early Cambrian period.[1]

Unfortunatley most readers of Wikipedia would not be able to access Current Biology to read the article themselves. The sentence does not intimate how the Dilemma is resolved by the Lee et al's. findings. I wonder whether you could not summarize the findings in words that would be generally understandable. Reading the Phys.Org summary of the Lee et al's. findings they seem to be out of place where it is now. It belongs, if these findings are to be included at all, in the section Punctuated Equilibrium where the fossil record and rate of evolution is discussed. Oggmus (talk) 06:26, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adão Pretto
added a link pointing to Brazilian
Alexandre Padilha
added a link pointing to Brazilian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Alessandro Molon
added a link pointing to Broadcaster
Altemir Gregolin
added a link pointing to Santa Catarina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cândido Vaccarezza, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Brazilian and Doctor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:[edit]

Hi, I have responded in my talk page. Please take time to look at my response. Thanks! - PatTag2659, a hopeful aviator (talk) 11:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Gold[edit]

Your edit to the gold article looks a little strange. The source you have added is about a two neutron star super nova which is a very tiny subclass of all suber novae. Is gold only produced in this type of super nova? If not, we should go with the majority of gold produced and not with the small and uniportant subclass.--Stone (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Stone (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chalk may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • believed that Hagoromo chalk was "''so powerful that mathematics practically writes itself''”.<ref>[ What's So Special About This Japanese Chalk? <small>The company has folded, but the chalk is still

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:14, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What you are missing[edit]

I'm prepared to tolerate a certain level of talk page misuse. The problem arises when it turns into a repeating pattern. Note that it isn't harmless -- people who maintain articles actually have to waste their time reading that stuff. Best regards, Looie496 (talk) 00:15, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Super-chicken Model, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://adonis49.wordpress.com/2015/07/09/drop-the-super-chicken-model-in-the-workplace/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Superman memory crystal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://iran-daily.com/News/136834.html?catid=1023. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 14:31, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Control copyright icon Hello Luizpuodzius, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

  • You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
  • Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
  • Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
  • If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
  • In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
  • Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lindsay Lohan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited José Serra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Panama Papers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Democratic Labour Party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

I noticed your addition of a reference to Dilma Rousseff. It was not done exactly correctly, however. I have fixed that. In the meantime, may I be so bold as to ask you to review Template:citenews? Dschslava Δx parlez moi 18:42, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

votação[edit]

Se vc quiser participar. Att, User:Luizpuodzius.2804:14C:5BB5:A56E:580C:EADD:DF98:E690 (talk) 02:15, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Impeachment proposal against Michel Temer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Impeachment proposal against Michel Temer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cambalachero (talk) 15:05, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pedido[edit]

Você poderia (caso tenha força, vontade e/ou tempo) traduzir esta página para o inglês? Agradeço desde agora. (Saudações huebrs.) 187.20.86.222 (talk) 21:46, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Se quiser traduzir este também, fique a vontade. 2804:14C:5BB6:8956:3CBE:BDF:D076:24B8 (talk) 03:37, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of US support for the Nazism for deletion[edit]

Hello. A discussion is taking place as to whether the article US support for the Nazism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/US support for the Nazism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, please do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:46, 25 September 2016 (UT

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Por estar desenvolvendo US support for the Nazism com base em Apoio dos Estados Unidos ao Nazismo. Parabéns! E já que você entende português, aqui uma mensagem em minha língua nativa ^^. 201.17.231.40 (talk) 18:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Caso apaguem, aqui um meio de melhorar o artigo para depois publicar. 201.17.139.2 (talk) 15:08, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Pretende voltar a traduzir o artigo depois ou não vale a pena? (porque como não sei muito bem inglês eu pedirei a outro fazer a tradução). Att. 201.17.230.165 (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Estava lidando com um furacão e esperando pra ver se os direitosos vão deletar o artigo. Dr. LooTalk to me 03:01, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Entendi. 201.17.138.145 (talk) 04:35, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Então prepara o código-fonte do artigo em português para ser salvo em word porque vão querer apagar a fonte da tradução lá. Att. 201.17.138.145 (talk) 04:54, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perguntar sem pegadinha[edit]

Você acha que o artigo Nazism in the United States poderá ser um artigo destacado pelo menos na anglófona? Que Deus lhe pague pelas suas boas contribuições. 150.164.116.247 (talk) 19:53, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Favor olhar esta discussão[edit]

aqui. 187.104.26.144 (talk) 20:11, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Se fosse você não desistiria, ele está se portando como isto aqui, acho que tu podes pedir o bloqueio dele ou mesmo verificação de contas. 187.104.24.185 (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Se você se interessar... 187.104.24.185 (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Se for possivel mover e/ou propor mover para "Fascism in the United States" e acrescentar estas 2 fontes, eu agradeceria. Mas eu fico grato só de tu ter defendido este artigo desde o início. 187.104.24.185 (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[2][3][reply]
Estranho é esta conta ter comportamento similar a do sujeito em questão em outro artigo que estou trabalhando. Mas isso é só uma ideia. 187.104.24.185 (talk) 13:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Se for de seu interesse... Sdds.187.104.27.40 (talk) 19:37, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Se você quiser participar, fique a vontade. 201.17.177.4 (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Se você acha este link válido... 201.17.139.118 (talk) 17:22, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ Darwin's dilemma resolved: Biologists measure evolution's Big Bang in "Phys.org" on Sep 12, 2013 - Journal reference: Current Biology, Lee et al.: "Rates of Phenotypic and Genomic Evolution during the Cambrian Explosion." dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.07.055
  2. ^ David F. Schmitz, “‘A Fine Young Revolution’: The United States and the Fascist Revolution in Italy, 1919–1925,” Radical History Review, 33 (September 1985), 117–38
  3. ^ John P. Diggins, Mussolini and Fascism: The View from America (Princeton 1972).

Veja mais (nazism in the united states)[edit]

[1] [2] [3] [4] 177.182.53.7 (talk) 15:12, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infelizmente só verifiquei algumas fontes por falta de tempo e por estar em lan house pelo fato da placa de vídeo ter queimado, mas é vida que se segue. 177.182.53.7 (talk) 16:11, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Já verifiquei. 177.182.53.7 (talk) 14:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Luizpuodzius. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Se você quiser traduzir mais esta página[edit]

Aqui, para completar a série.201.17.178.193 (talk) 17:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mais um (agora pro português) (e esta). 201.17.178.193 (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mais links: (escondidinho)
Caso apaguem o artigo em português, é só pedir o PDF que mandei por email para o Raimundo Vasconcelos. Abs. 177.182.248.191 (talk) 19:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fontes[edit]

Infelizmente existe pessoas que implicam com as coisas, vamos ver no que vai dar. E se vc quiser usar, as novas fontes. aqui, aqui, aqui. 187.20.78.223 (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

E querendo traduzir, fique a vontade. 187.20.78.223 (talk) 23:39, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As fontes que uso: [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11], [12] 177.182.53.7 (talk) 19:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mais um link, este e este 177.182.249.19 (talk) 02:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Neutral point of view noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello, Luizpuodzius. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

+ fontes (N.Z in the U.S)[edit]

[13] [14] [15] 187.104.24.84 (talk) 02:37, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tradução na wiki-pt[edit]

Se vc quiser (e puder) continuar meu trabalho e de outros lá, atualizando o conteúdo e movendo para o artigo principal, fique a vontade. Cheers. 187.104.25.74 (talk) 06:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ainda se quiser aproveitar as minhas edições em inglês e a dos outras além de mexer em alguma coisa e mover o conteúdo para o artigo principal, eu agradeço. 201.17.229.199 (talk) 23:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+ fontes da vida: [16] (p.614, 671) [17] [18] [19] [20] 177.182.251.240 (talk) 05:28, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[21] 201.17.229.6 e [22] (talk) 02:29, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Depois deste artigo, se quiser traduzir outro[edit]

Não sei se tem correspondente aqui, mas seria interessante acrescentar algo. 187.104.24.155 (talk) 03:03, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mais uma fonte, esta, esta, esta e esta. 189.101.36.98 (talk) 16:48, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+1 Att. 201.17.231.172 (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
+ bibliografia 187.104.45.118 (talk) 00:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Former Home Of Eugenics Research Now Warns Of Modern Eugenics Ideas, How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power, Documents: Bush's Grandfather Directed Bank Tied to Man Who Funded Hitler 201.17.137.222 (talk) 00:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boa tarde[edit]

Já que você desistiu de traduzir o artigo, poderia me indicar outro para prosseguir a tradução? É que eu acho este artigo meio fraco para ser mantido por agora. Abçs. 187.20.78.69 (talk) 15:05, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belchior (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fagner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE:re[edit]

Luiz, Would it be a good move to change the title to fascism in the United States?. 201.17.139.175 (talk) 10:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nazism in the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

COATTRACK NPOV, unencyclopedic. Any good content should be merged into either NeoNazism, Bund, or Antisemitism in the United States.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 23:31, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to see want prompted this at AN/I: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Could_I_borrow_a_few_eyeballs.3F. d.g. L3X1 (distant write) 23:46, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nazism in the United States for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nazism in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazism in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —JJBers 02:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

aqui. 187.104.24.79 (talk) 13:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 15:25, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Anmccaff. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Fascism in the United States have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Already under discussion at ANI. Anmccaff (talk) 01:00, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this alert carefully[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 16:55, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mental fact for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mental fact is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mental fact until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 06:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Boas tardes[edit]

Tu tens email? Att. 150.164.100.160 (talk) 20:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Puodzius@yahoo.com. Dr. LooTalk to me 20:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Aqui um fundador do nazismo ianque: Heinz Spanknobel. 2804:14C:5BB5:80EE:7D27:DEA8:F833:ED45 (talk) 00:11, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Luizpuodzius. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and appeal to the UN[edit]

Please see my query on the Talk Page. Thanks Roundtheworld (talk) 11:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Zinkpo moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Zinkpo, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:15, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zinkpo has been accepted[edit]

Zinkpo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Catrìona (talk) 22:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Luizpuodzius. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Cláudia Rodrigues Ferreira de Carvalho, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Newslinger talk 16:22, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Argumentos pela reversão[edit]

Dear Luizpuodzius, I know that you also speak Portuguese, I will address you in Portuguese. The edition that I undo is inadequate for the following reasons: I) "Leftist iconic leader", the expression is intended to emphasize the person of Mr. Lula II) "President elect of the extreme right" the expression is intended to denigrate the image of Bolsonaro, because this is a classification that he rejects and usually used by the left-wing media, precisely for this purpose; the Wikipedia article does not classify it as extreme right, but rather says that some of its statements have been classified as extreme right - if you associate point one to two, it is clear impartiality. III) It was not Mr. Sérgio Moro who arrested him unilaterally, but after the STF's authorization and after the second conviction of TRF-4. Including Moro's appointment to the ministry without associating it with other judicial decisions suggests that Lula was a "victim" of a political judge who benefited another politician, who benefited him in turn. Well, thank you so much for your attention.

  • Caro Luizpuodzius, sei que o senhor também fala português, dirijo-me então ao senhor em português. A edição que eu desfiz é inadequada pelos seguintes motivos: I) "Líder icônico de esquerda", a expressão grifada tem como objetivo ressaltar a pessoa do senhor Lula II) "Presidente eleito de extrema-direita" a expressão grifada tem como objetivo denegrir a imagem de Bolsonaro, pois está é uma classificação que ele rechaça e usualmente usada pela mídia de esquerda, justamente com esse objetivo; o artigo na Wikipédia (em português) não o classifica como extrema-direita, e sim diz que algumas de suas declarações têm sido classificadas como extrema-direita — se você associar o ponto um ao dois, fica clara a imparcialidade. III) Não foi o senhor Sérgio Moro quem o prendeu unilateralmente, e sim após a autorização do STF e depois da segunda condenação do TRF-4. Incluir a nomeação de Moro ao ministério sem associá-la às demais decisões judiciais dão a entender que Lula foi "vítima" de um juiz político que beneficiou um outro político, que o beneficiou por sua vez. Bem, muito obrigado pela atenção.Pórokhov Порох 04:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Luizpuodzius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Legacypac (talk) 21:19, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Buy Muy Drugs[edit]

Hello Luizpuodzius,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Buy Muy Drugs for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is significant enough to be included in an encyclopedia, and the artist doesn't have an article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 20:05, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Luizpuodzius,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Britishfinance and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Buy Muy Drugs, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pode ver porque eu fui bloqueado na WP portuguesa?[edit]

Fui bloqueado por baixo calão quando estava explicando e respondendo uma usuária sobre como deve ser escritos datas na página que ela criou em Porteira fechada. 189.101.107.233 (talk) 01:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC) (I was blocked by slang [someone] when I was just explained and responding to an user about the use of "dates" in an article that she created "Portera fechada".[reply]

I am awaitng for an answer from Pórokhov . Dr. LooTalk to me 21:09, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bom dia[edit]

Poderias caso queira traduzir estas páginas pra mim? att 2804:14C:5BB5:91BD:5163:87AE:E85E:400F (talk) 13:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tá indo bem a tradução? 2804:14C:5BB5:88C0:ADE9:1ECC:76D3:989 (talk) 23:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Se ainda der para pelo menos traduzir a mais o artigo "Batalha da Praça da Sé" eu agradeço. att 2804:14C:5BB5:A5C6:E129:3929:667F:5D69 (talk) 05:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE[edit]

Podia traduzir este artigo pro inglês pfvr? nunca te pedi nda. 2804:14C:5BB5:A5C6:D97C:43B6:F8B0:3EF1 (talk) 00:01, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grato por traduzir algo sobre a Ursal. att 2804:14C:5BB5:A5C6:7C58:AAE:AB74:95C (talk) 08:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

/* Bom dia (2) */[edit]

Será que vc dá pra traduzir as partes mais importantes destes artigos para o português? abçs. 2804:14C:5BB5:A5C6:95EC:EDC8:E003:68AC (talk) 01:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ou então esta. att 177.152.161.93 (talk) 18:01, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bernie Sanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brazilian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]