Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:UFAA)
Jump to: navigation, search
 Usernames for administrator attention

Important! Please remember the following:

  1. This page is for usernames that are such blatant and serious problems that they need to be immediately blocked.
  2. Reports are assessed according to the username policy and the UAA instructions. Please read those pages first.
  3. Please discuss less-serious violations with the user so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith.
  4. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
  5. Please do not leave a username warning template on a user's talk page and then immediately report them here. Either discuss it with the user, or report it for admin action, but don't do both at the same time.
  6. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not.
  7. Do not report a username unless it has been used in the last 2-3 weeks. Older accounts are likely abandoned and reports of such users will be summarily declined.


Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 22:00 on 14 February 2016 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


Bot-reported[edit]

False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. "Lucky looser" is a common sports term. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Seams like a regular real name. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Plausibly a real name. I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. I, JethroBT drop me a line 05:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:02, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:03, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:12, 14 February 2016 (UTC).
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 02:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
False positive: Username is not a blatant violation of the username policy. It's a chant. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:15, 14 February 2016 (UTC).
Comment: User:Yobot is an existing bot account. Editor should probably be required to change name. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 13:19, 14 February 2016 (UTC).

User-reported[edit]

Being discussed with the user. Bishonen | talk 11:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
  • Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Long or confusing usernames, according to the username policy, "are not so inappropriate on their own as to require action." -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. It's a common variation of a popular song / nursery rhyme, Skip to My Lou. "Loo" in this case actually means love, not lavatory. WaggersTALK 10:55, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Not a blatant violation. If there are associated editing problems with this account, please ping me. I, JethroBT drop me a line 06:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. The account has no edits, so there's no evidence they've attempted to imitate anyone. We allow people with IPs to make accounts using abbreviations of their IP address; this doesn't seem problematic to me. I, JethroBT drop me a line 06:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Stale: This account has not been used in the last 2-3 weeks. 5 years, actually. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2016 (UTC)