Laser hair removal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hair removal laser working at 755nm and 1064nm. The device to the right provides air cooling

Laser hair removal is the process of removing unwanted hair by means of exposure to pulses of laser light that destroy the hair follicle. It had been performed experimentally for about 20 years before becoming commercially available in the mid-1990s.[1] One of the first published articles describing laser hair removal was authored by the group at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1998.[2][3] The efficacy of laser hair removal is now generally accepted in the dermatology community,[citation needed] and laser hair removal is widely practiced in clinics, and even in homes using devices designed and priced for consumer self-treatment. Many reviews of laser hair removal methods, safety, and efficacy have been published in the dermatology literature.[4]

Mechanism of action[edit]

The primary principle behind laser hair removal is selective photothermolysis (SPTL), the matching of a specific wavelength of light and pulse duration to obtain optimal effect on a targeted tissue with minimal effect on surrounding tissue. Lasers can cause localized damage by selectively heating dark target matter, melanin, in the area that causes hair growth, the follicle, while not heating the rest of the skin. Light is absorbed by dark objects, so laser energy can be absorbed by dark material in the skin, but with much more speed and intensity. This dark target matter, or chromophore, can be naturally-occurring or artificially introduced.

Melanin is considered the primary chromophore for all hair removal lasers currently on the market. Melanin occurs naturally in the skin, and gives skin and hair their color. There are two types of melanin in hair. Eumelanin gives hair brown or black color, while pheomelanin gives hair blonde or red color. Because of the selective absorption of photons of laser light, only black or brown hair can be removed. Laser works best with dark coarse hair. Light skin and dark hair are an ideal combination, being most effective and producing the best results, but new lasers are now able to target black hair in patients with dark skin with some success.[5]

Hair removal lasers have been in use since 1997 and have been approved for "permanent hair reduction" in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).[5] Under the FDA's definition, "permanent" hair reduction is the long-term, stable reduction in the number of hairs regrowing after a treatment regime. Indeed, many patients experience complete regrowth of hair on their treated areas in the years following their last treatment. This means that although laser treatments with these devices will permanently reduce the total number of body hairs, they will not result in a permanent removal of all hair. [6]

Laser hair removal has become popular because of its speed and efficacy, although some of the efficacy is dependent upon the skill and experience of the laser operator,[citation needed] and the choice and availability of different laser technologies used for the procedure. Some will need touch-up treatments, especially on large areas, after the initial set of 3-8 treatments. It has also been noted that some people are "non-responders" – this occurs when the incorrect device is being used, the device parameters are too low or the patient is simply not a good candidate for treatment.[citation needed]

Comparison with electrolysis and IPL[edit]

A 2006 review article in the journal "Lasers in Medical Science" compared IPL and both alexandrite and diode lasers. The review found no statistical difference in effectiveness, but a higher incidence of side effects with diode laser based treatment. Hair reduction after 6 months was reported as 68.75% for alexandrite lasers, 71.71% for diode lasers, and 66.96% for IPL. Side effects were reported as 9.5% for alexandrite lasers, 28.9% for diode lasers, and 15.3% for IPL. All side effects were found to be temporary and even pigmentation changes returned to normal within 6 months.[7]

Electrolysis is another hair removal method that has been used for over 135 years.[8] Unlike laser epilation, electrolysis can be used to remove 100% of the hair from an area and is effective on hair of all colors, if used at an adequate power level with proper technique. More hair may grow in certain areas that are prone to hormone-induced growth (e.g. a woman's chin and neck) based on individual hormone levels or changes therein, and one's genetic predisposition to grow new hair.

A study conducted in 2000 at the ASVAK Laser Center in Ankara, Turkey comparing alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal on 12 patients concluded that laser hair removal was 60 times faster, less painful and more reliable than electrolysis. It is important to note that the type of electrolysis performed in the study was galvanic electrolysis, rather than the more widely used methods of thermolysis or the blend. Galvanic current requires 30 seconds to more than a minute to release each hair whereas thermolysis or the blend require mere seconds. The use of galvanic electrolysis rather than thermolysis or the blend in this study thus could not display the true capability of electrolysis treatments performed by a modern professional.[9]

Intense pulsed light (IPL) epilators, though technically not containing a laser, use xenon flash lamps that emit full spectrum light. IPL-based methods, sometimes called "AFT", "phototricholysis" or "photoepilation", are now commonly (but incorrectly) referred to as "laser hair removal". IPL systems typically output wavelengths between 400 nm and 1200 nm. Filters are applied to block lower wavelengths, thereby only utilising the longer, redder wavelengths for clinical applications. IPLs offer certain advantages over laser, principally in the pulse duration. While lasers may output trains of short pulses to simulate a longer pulse, IPL systems can generate pulsewidths up to 250ms which is useful for larger diameter targets. Some current IPL systems have proven to be more successful in the removal of hair and blood vessels than many lasers,[10][11][12]

Regulation[edit]

In some countries—including the U.S.—hair removal is an unregulated procedure that anyone can do. In some places, only doctors and doctor-supervised personnel can do it while in other cases permission extends to licensed professionals, such as regular nurses, physician assistants, estheticians, and/or cosmetologists. The Florida Board of Medicine has determined that the use of lasers, laser-like devices and intense pulsed light devices is considered the practice of medicine, and requires they be used only by a physician (D.O. or M.D.), a physician assistant under the supervision of a physician, or an advanced registered nurse practitioner under a protocol signed by a physician. An electrologist working under the direct supervision and responsibility of a physician is also allowed to perform laser hair removal in the state of Florida.[13]

Laser parameters that affect results[edit]

Several wavelengths of laser energy have been used for hair removal, from visible light to near-infrared radiation. These lasers are characterized by their wavelength, measured in nanometers (nm):

Argon: 488 nm (Turquoise/Cyan) or 514.5 nm (Green) (no longer used for hair removal)
Ruby laser: 694.3 nm  (Deep Red) (only safe for patients with very pale skin)
Alexandrite: 755 nm (Near-Infrared) (safe and effective on all skin types, Fitzpatrick I-VI)
Pulsed diode array: 810 nm (Near-Infrared) (for pale to medium type skin)
Nd:YAG laser: 1064 nm (Near-Infrared) (made for treating darker skin types, though effective on all skin types)
IPL or Intense pulsed light: 810 nm  (Not a laser but used for hair removal) (for pale to medium type skin)

Pulse width (or duration) is one of the most important considerations. The length of the heating pulse relates directly to the damage achieved in the follicle. When attempting to destroy hair follicles the main target is the germ cells which live on the surface of the hair shaft. Light energy is absorbed by the melanin within the hair and heat is generated. The heat then conducts out towards the germ cells. As long as a sufficient temperature is maintained for the required time then these cells will be successfully destroyed. This is absolutely critical - attaining the require temperature is not sufficient unless it is kept at that temperature for the corresponding time. This is determined by the Arrhenius Rate Equation.[14] To achieve these conditions the laser/IPL system must be able to generate the required power output. The main reason why hair removal fails is simply because the equipment cannot generate the desired temperature for the correct time.

Spot size, or the width of the laser beam, directly affects the depth of penetration of the light energy due to scattering effects in the dermal layer. Larger beam diameters result in deeper deposition of energy and hence can induce higher temperatures in deeper follicles. Hair removal lasers have a spot size about the size of a fingertip (3-18mm).

Fluence or energy density is another important consideration. Fluence is measured in joules per square centimeter (J/cm²). It's important to get treated at high enough settings to heat up the follicles enough to disable them from producing hair.

Epidermal cooling has been determined to allow higher fluences and reduce pain and side effects, especially in darker skin. Three types of cooling have been developed:

  • Contact cooling: through a window cooled by circulating water or other internal coolant. This type of cooling is by far the most efficient method of keeping the epidermis protected since it provides a constant heat sink at the skin surface. Sapphire windows are much more conductive than quartz.
  • Cryogen spray: sprayed directly onto the skin immediately before and/or after the laser pulse
  • Air cooling: forced cold air at -34 degrees C

In essence, the important output parameter when treating hair (and other skin conditions) is power density - this is a combination of energy, spot diameter and pulse duration. These three parameters determine what actually happens when the light energy is absorbed by the tissue chromophore be it melanin, haemoglobin or water, with the amount of tissue damaged being determined by the temperature/time combination.

Number of sessions[edit]

Hair grows in several phases (anagen, telogen, catagen) and a laser can only affect the currently active growing hair follicles (early anagen). Hence, several sessions are needed to kill hair in all phases of growth.

Multiple treatments depending on the type of hair and skin color have been shown to provide long-term reduction of hair. Most patients need a minimum of seven treatments. Current parameters differ from device to device but manufacturers and clinicians generally recommend waiting from three to eight weeks between sessions, depending on the area being treated. The number of sessions depends on various parameters, including the area of the body being treated, skin color, coarseness of hair, reason for hirsutism, and sex. Coarse dark hair on light skin is easiest to treat. Certain areas (notably men's faces) may require considerably more treatments to achieve desired results.

Laser does not work well on light-colored hair, red hair, grey hair, white hair, as well as fine hair of any color, such as vellus. For darker skin patients with black hair, the long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser with a cooling tip can be safe and effective when used by an experienced practitioner.

Typically the shedding of the treated hairs takes about two to three weeks. These hairs should be allowed to fall out on their own and should not be manipulated by the patient for certain reasons, chiefly to avoid infections. Pulling hairs after treatment can be more painful as well.

Other uses[edit]

Hair removal lasers are effective treatment for pseudofolliculitis barbae, commonly called "ingrown hairs" or "shaving bumps". They have recently been reported as helpful treatment for pilonidal cysts, since they eliminate the ingrown hairs that produce the troublesome foreign body reactions in this malady.[citation needed]

Side effects and risks[edit]

Some normal side effects may occur after laser hair removal treatments, including itching, pink skin, redness, and swelling around the treatment area or swelling of the follicles (follicular edema). These side effects rarely last more than two or three days. The two most common serious side effects are acne and skin discoloration.

Some level of pain should also be expected during treatments. Numbing creams are available at most clinics, sometimes for an additional cost. Some numbing creams are available over the counter. Use of strong numbing creams over large skin areas being treated at one time must be avoided, as this has seriously harmed, and even killed, patients.[15] Typically, the cream should be applied about 30 minutes before the procedure. Icing the area after the treatment helps relieve the side effects faster. Ibrahimi and Kilmer reported a study of a novel device of diode handpiece with a large spot size which used vacuum-assisted suction to reduce the level of pain associated with laser treatment.[16]

Unwanted side effects such as hypo- or hyper-pigmentation or, in extreme cases, burning of the skin call for an adjustment in laser selection or settings. Risks include the chance of burning the skin or discoloration of the skin, hypopigmentation (white spots), flare of acne, swelling around the hair follicle (considered a normal reaction), scab formation, purpura, and infection. These risks can be reduced by treatment with an appropriate laser type used at appropriate settings for the individual's skin type and treatment area.

Some patients may show side effects from an allergy to either the hair removal gel used with certain laser types or to a numbing cream, or to simply shaving the area too soon in relation to the treatment.

Rare side effects include blistering, scarring and skin texture changes.[17]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ "Hair Removal Methods: Laser History and Current Issues". Quackwatch. 
  2. ^ Dierickx, CC; Grossman, MC; Farinelli, WA; Anderson, RR (1998). "Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser". Archives of dermatology 134 (7): 837–42. doi:10.1001/archderm.134.7.837. PMID 9681347. 
  3. ^ Gold, MH (2007). "Lasers and light sources for the removal of unwanted hair". Clinics in dermatology 25 (5): 443–53. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2007.05.017. PMID 17870522. 
  4. ^ Eremia, S; Li, CY; Umar, SH; Newman, N (2001). "Laser hair removal: Long-term results with a 755 nm alexandrite laser". Dermatologic surgery 27 (11): 920–4. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2001.01074.x. PMID 11737124. 
  5. ^ a b "Laser Facts". FDA.gov. 
  6. ^ "Radiation-Emitting Products: Laser Facts". FDA. 
  7. ^ Toosi, Parviz (3/1/2006). "A comparison study of the efficacy and side effects of different light sources in hair removal". Lasers in medical science 21 (1): 1–4. doi:10.1007/s10103-006-0373-2. 
  8. ^ Michel, CE (Oct 1875). "Trichiasis and distichiasis; with an improved method for radical treatment". St. Louis Clinical Record 2: 145–148. 
  9. ^ Görgü M, Aslan G, Aköz T, Erdoğan B (January 2000). "Comparison of alexandrite laser and electrolysis for hair removal". Dermatol Surgery 26 (1): 37–41. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99104.x. PMID 10632684. 
  10. ^ Michael Drosner et al. (2008) Comparison of intense pulsed light (IPL) and pulsed dye laser (PDL) in port-wine stain treatment Medical Laser Application 23 (3): 133–140. (http://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S161516150800046X)
  11. ^ Babilas P. et al. (2010) Split-face comparison of intense pulsed light with short- and long-pulsed dye lasers for the treatment of port-wine stains. Lasers Surg. Med. 42(8): 720–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/pubmed/20886506
  12. ^ Behrooz Barikbin, Azin Ayatollahi, Somayeh Hejazi, Zahra Saffarian, Sara Zamani. (2011) The Use of Intense Pulsed Light (IPL) for the Treatment of Vascular Lesions, Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 2: 2, Spring
  13. ^ http://www.doh.state.fl.us/MQA/medical/me_laser.html[dead link]
  14. ^ Murphy M.J., Torstensson P.A. Thermal relaxation times: an outdated concept in photothermal treatments. Lasers in Medical Science, DOI 10.1007/s10103-013-1445-8, October 2013
  15. ^ Public Health Advisory: Life-Threatening Side Effects with the Use of Skin Products Containing Numbing Ingredients for Cosmetic Procedures, FDA
  16. ^ Ibrahimi OA, Kilmer SL (June 2012). "Long-term clinical evaluation of a 800-nm long-pulsed diode laser with a large spot size and vacuum-assisted suction for hair removal.". Dermatol Surgery 38 (6): 912–917. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02380.x. PMID 22455549. 
  17. ^ http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/laser-hair-removal/MY00134

External links[edit]