North American energy independence
|This article's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. (June 2012)|
|This article needs additional citations for verification. (June 2009)|
North American energy independence is a stated goal of those who believe that the North American nations - the United States, Canada and Mexico - must eliminate their reliance on oil purchased from outside the continent. A related, less absolute, policy may be called North American energy security. In 2012 in an editorial in a Canadian newspaper, Mexican president elect Enrique Peña Nieto, called North American energy security a "common goal" of Canada and Mexico.
The benefits are argued to be the reduction of North America's energy dependence on unstable regions such as the Middle East and South America and limiting oil imperialism to the North American Free Trade Area, reducing exposure to terrorism abroad; lower balance of trade and foreign exchange stresses on the U.S. economy in an era when suppliers may begin to price oil in euros; the development of renewable energy sources to displace fossil fuels; and the promotion of energy conservation and technology (such as insulation, green roof, and lighting efficiency) exportable to energy-poor nations.
The Apollo Alliance, a coalition of businesses, strategists, labor unions, and environmental organizations is advocating a ten-point plan for energy independence. Another group is the Set America Free Coalition formed by prominent individuals and non-profit organizations concerned about the security and economic implications of America’s growing dependence on foreign oil.
American political rhetoric includes the phrase "foreign oil" as something of which the United States must reduce or eliminate its imports. This is related to the general perception that the major global oil exporting countries are either openly hostile to US foreign policy and interests (Iran, Venezuela, and formerly Iraq), are former or potential future rivals (Russia) or are unsavoury allies (Saudi Arabia). However, most of American imports of oil come not from these countries, but from Canada and Mexico. As well Canada and Mexico export natural gas, uranium, and electricity to the United States. At the same time oil is globalized, fungible commodity: even if the United States does not buy oil from Iran, a price disruption cause by a drop in Iranian supplies would still impact American consumers. During the early 2010s American demand for energy dropped as a result of the Great Recession, and American production of oil and especially natural gas increase with new shale gas finds coming into production. Foreign dependence is not the only factor in North American energy politics, however; environmental concerns around land and water pollution as well as greenhouse gasses related to are also a matter of controversy. In Canada and Mexico there is also the concern not to have energy policy dictated by the United States, as well as tension over American ownership of energy companies.
Programs to limit US energy interests in Canada and Mexico
In 1937 Mexico passed a constitutional amendment to nationalize its oil industry, which lead to the creation of Pemex, the national oil company. There have been several proposals to privatize Pemex since, but they have never come to fruition as many Mexicans fear foreign control of this stragetic industry.
The 1957 Canadian election as fought partially in response to the 1956 Pipeline Debate which concerned wheather or not the government should allow a U.S.-owned company to build a trans-Canadian gas pipeline and whether or not the route should be entirely within Canada or partly through the United States. The right-leaning Progressive Conservatives and leftist Co-operative Commonwealth Federation opposition parties opposed American involvement in the pipeline while the Liberal government supported it. The Liberals were defeated in the 1957 election.
In 1973, the Liberals and the leftist New Democratic Party voted together to create Canada's own state energy company Petro-Canada, which began operations in 1976, though it bough assets from private companies rather than seizing them as in many other countries. In 1980, with the Liberals again in power, the National Energy Program was launched to create oil self-sufficiency within Canada. It attempted to use tax incentives to discourage oil exports (mostly from Western Canada, primarily the province of Alberta) to the US, and redirect these towards to the oil importing provinces of Eastern Canada. As well the Liberals created the Foreign Investment Review Agency to screen foreign (mostly US) takeovers of Canadian companies. These policies were bitterly opposed by the provincial government of Alberta, and were repealed and reserved during the Conservative government of 1984-1993 which sough closer economic ties with the US, including the Canada-US Free Trade Agreement of 1988.
Bush's 2006 "Addicted to oil" speech
|“||Keeping America competitive requires affordable energy. And here we have a serious problem: America is addicted to oil, which is often imported from unstable parts of the world. The best way to break this addiction is through technology. Since 2001, we have spent nearly $10 billion to develop cleaner, cheaper and more reliable alternative energy sources. And we are on the threshold of incredible advances. So tonight, I announce the Advanced Energy Initiative -- a 22 percent increase in clean-energy research at the Department of Energy to push for breakthroughs in two vital areas. To change how we power our homes and offices, we will invest more in zero-emission coal-fired plants; revolutionary solar and wind technologies; and clean, safe nuclear energy.
We must also change how we power our automobiles. We will increase our research in better batteries for hybrid and electric cars and in pollution-free cars that run on hydrogen.
We will also fund additional research in cutting-edge methods of producing ethanol, not just from corn but from wood chips and stalks or switch grass. Our goal is to make this new kind of ethanol practical and competitive within six years. Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach another great goal: to replace more than 75 percent of our oil imports from the Middle East by 2025. By applying the talent and technology of America, this country can dramatically improve our environment, move beyond a petroleum- based economy and make our dependence on Middle Eastern oil a thing of the past.
U.S. President Barack Obama has repeatedly stated that the U.S. has begin "freeing ourselves from foreign oil" including during his 2012 reelection speech Canadian observers have noted that his usage of "foreign" does not include Canada. Yet he has not yet approved the Keystone XL pipline because of domestic environmental concerns over water quality as well as the general antipathy of the environmental movement to pipeline building, and the production practices in the source (the Athabasca Oil Sands).
- Advanced Energy Initiative
- Clean energy
- United States energy independence
- Electric cars
- Energy security
- Renewable energy
- Sustainable energy
- Yergin, Daniel; "How is Energy Remaking the World?" Foreign Policy July/August 2012 pg. 61
- The State of the Union: A Look Between the Lines, NPR
- Bush: U.S. must cut oil dependence, MSNBC
- Bush in a lighter shade of green, BBC News
- President Bush's State of the Union Address, The Washington Post
- American Energy Independence
- Turning Oil into Salt: Energy Independence Through Fuel Choice
- How Dependent Is the United States on Foreign Oil?
- American Energy Independence Day 2008
- Energy Independence Plan
- USA Energy Independence.com
- "Dangers of U.S dependence on foreign oil"
- Humankind public radio's "Passengers" program interview with Policy Director Matt Maryl
- U.S. to Be World’s Top Oil Producer in 5 Years, Report Says November 12, 2012