Talk:Elizabeth II: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 189: Line 189:


Her surname isn’t Windsor. By convention the soverign has no surname. Although for convenience in the modern world many Royals use surnames (eg. The now Prince of Wales used Wales when in the military), these are pseudonyms for the sake of conscience and not really surnames. She is a member of the House of Windsor, but her name has never been Windsor and this should not be listed as her name, regardless of what was written on her death certificate (which I think again falls under the category of practical pseudonyms for their own filing systems) [[User:Timothy N-F|Timothy N-F]] ([[User talk:Timothy N-F|talk]]) 01:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Her surname isn’t Windsor. By convention the soverign has no surname. Although for convenience in the modern world many Royals use surnames (eg. The now Prince of Wales used Wales when in the military), these are pseudonyms for the sake of conscience and not really surnames. She is a member of the House of Windsor, but her name has never been Windsor and this should not be listed as her name, regardless of what was written on her death certificate (which I think again falls under the category of practical pseudonyms for their own filing systems) [[User:Timothy N-F|Timothy N-F]] ([[User talk:Timothy N-F|talk]]) 01:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
:We already had an RFC on whether or not to show Windsor as a surname. The result of that RFC was "NO". [[User:GoodDay|GoodDay]] ([[User talk:GoodDay|talk]]) 01:47, 17 December 2022 (UTC)


== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 December 2022 ==
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 December 2022 ==

Revision as of 01:47, 17 December 2022

Featured articleElizabeth II is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 2, 2012, and on September 19, 2022.
Did You KnowIn the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 29, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 15, 2006Good article nomineeNot listed
January 26, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
August 26, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
January 26, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 22, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
February 23, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
May 21, 2010Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 31, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
February 4, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
September 14, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 21, 2012Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 2, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Queen Elizabeth II (pictured) once worked as a lorry driver?
In the news News items involving this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on September 9, 2015, June 2, 2022, and September 8, 2022.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on June 2, 2004, February 6, 2005, June 2, 2005, February 6, 2006, June 2, 2006, June 2, 2007, February 6, 2008, February 6, 2009, February 6, 2010, February 6, 2012, February 6, 2015, February 6, 2017, February 6, 2019, and February 6, 2022.
Current status: Featured article

Religion

Should we include her religion in the infobox? Consensus is to include it for her father George VI and her son Charles III. Векочел (talk) 19:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why it's included in George VI & Charles III's infoboxes. Are they included in all the British monarch infoboxes & their predecessors, the English, Scottish, Irish & Welsh monarch infoboxes? GoodDay (talk) 19:57, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, but perhaps it should be included for all the English and British monarchs since Henry VIII. The monarch is the head of the Church of England, which seems like an important religious role. Векочел (talk) 20:48, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What about the Scottish, Irish & Welsh monarchs? GoodDay (talk) 20:54, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have any evidence that their religious beliefs were particularly significant, but it can be added for particular monarchs if it is significant for them. Векочел (talk) 04:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I checked over the bios of Henry VIII through Anne, then George I through Charles III. Nearly all the English & British monarch bios mention their religion. Some most say Protestant or Anglican, while one or two say Catholic. So, I've no objections to adding Elizabeth II's religion to her infobox. Besides, the religion in mentioned in both her immediate predecessors & successors' infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 04:32, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should be 'Anglican' or 'Church of England' rather than Protestant. Protestant is very broad & Anglicanism isn't really Protestant it's more of its own thing being the middle-way between Catholicism & Protestantism. TheFriendlyFas2 (talk) 06:42, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's used to avoid having to list both her religions. DrKay (talk) 08:36, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think the religion section should be listed as "Protestantism (Anglican) איתן קרסנטי (talk) 13:19, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't include the second religion. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Formal photograph time

Is the photo currently in use taken in 1958 or 1959 (? The photo in the article is from 1958 But the file information says the photo is from 1959 Is this an article error

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Queen_Elizabeth_II_official_portrait_for_1959_tour_(retouched)_(cropped)_(3-to-4_aspect_ratio).jpg 2401:E180:88E0:2978:72F0:63D1:3F33:8140 2401:E180:88E0:CB31:5BF0:4718:6BAA:9111 (talk) 19:20, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Peter Ormond, who indicated that the photograph was taken in 1958. Peter, can you clarify where you go this information? The source page for the image indicates the photo is from 1959, though I can understand if the date refers to the date of publication and not the date the photo was taken. However, we need some kind of source to back this date up since several editors have challenged this. Aoi (青い) (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it probably was taken in 1958 (per similarity in setting, costume and style to another shoot that was definitely in 1958) but since our source says 1959, and WP:NOTTRUTH etc... we should say 1959. Thparkth (talk) 21:36, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Can you provide photos similar to what you are talking about? 61.216.108.177 (talk) 05:51, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See Talk:Elizabeth II/Archive 46#Infobox pic date. Peter Ormond 💬 11:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your guess may be right, but Wikipedia in other languages ​​is written in 1959 according to the file name, and the more detailed information of the file cannot be confirmed. 2401:E180:88E0:C1D:45A2:6ED5:8519:218A (talk) 04:20, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
According to your idea, do you need to adjust or supplement information 61.216.108.177 (talk) 03:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Thparkth that absent a reliable source that expressly says the photo is from 1958 (and there doesn't appear to be any), we should stick with the 1959 date given in the source. Alternatively, we could amend the caption to say something like, "Official photograph taken for 1959 tour", but that might be too wordy for the infobox. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:52, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done - went ahead and changed it to 1959. If anyone wants to revert, I won't argue about it. Thparkth (talk) 04:33, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i totally agree with you 2401:E180:8D62:313A:851F:EC5D:C425:FE5C (talk) 16:49, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First monarch to die in Scotland for 480 years

I would like.an interesting fact.to be added that the Queen was the first monarch to.die in Scotland for 480 years. JOEYTHEVIMSANTEPOET (talk) 16:33, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's already in the article. DrKay (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. JOEYTHEVIMSANTEPOET (talk) 12:59, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Death certificate full name in lead: Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor

I think the full name should be included in the lead. At the moment it seems strange that her surname is missing. The death certificate shows the full name to be "Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Windsor", so this would be a reliable source. It appears in many articles: [1] [2] Titus Gold (talk) 14:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Her surname isn’t Windsor. By convention the soverign has no surname. Although for convenience in the modern world many Royals use surnames (eg. The now Prince of Wales used Wales when in the military), these are pseudonyms for the sake of conscience and not really surnames. She is a member of the House of Windsor, but her name has never been Windsor and this should not be listed as her name, regardless of what was written on her death certificate (which I think again falls under the category of practical pseudonyms for their own filing systems) Timothy N-F (talk) 01:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We already had an RFC on whether or not to show Windsor as a surname. The result of that RFC was "NO". GoodDay (talk) 01:47, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 December 2022

2607:FEA8:41DF:BF00:78D6:867A:1C96:FE40 (talk) 01:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please change the name from elizabeth ii to queen elizabeth ii

 Not done for now: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the {{Edit extended-protected}} template. Among Us for POTUS (talk) 02:40, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note explaining her religious beliefs

For her son Charles, it is noted in the infobox that he is head of the Church of England and a member of the Church of Scotland. It appears the Queen worshipped in much the same way as King Charles. Векочел (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No objections. GoodDay (talk) 18:47, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Related RFC

May we have some input at this RFC. -- GoodDay (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]