'''[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|These are my 950,000+ contributions]]''' ([http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name=koavf&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia breakdown claiming 50,000+ more], [http://toolserver.org/~river/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Koavf&dbname=enwiki_p breakdown claiming 20,000+ more], [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=koavf&lang= cross-wiki breakdown], [http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Koavf cross-wiki count], [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=koavf&lang=en recent cross-wiki edits]); I'm a [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits|fairly active Wikipedian]]—as far as I'm aware, I'm only the [[User:Rich Farmbrough|second person]] to have a half-million edits to a single wiki. I think that Wikipedia is one of the few Internet communities worth joining, and the [[Anarchism|anarchistic approach]] to editing is its strongest feature. I generally edit articles concerned with [[politics]], [[philosophy]], [[religion]], or [[popular culture]], and I particularly try to represent the interests of [[truth]] and the [[Sahrawi]]s of [[Western Sahara]] ([[Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|SADR]]). To that end, I created the '''[[Portal:Western Sahara|Western Sahara Portal]]''', '''[[:Category:Western Sahara stubs]]''', '''[[Template:Western sahara to-do]]''', and the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Sahara|Western Sahara Project]]'''. Every now and again, I'll [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|sort stubs]], categorize pages, move misnamed articles, [[Wikipedia:Double redirects|fix double redirects]], or click on the [[Special:Random|random page link]] and do what I can.
'''[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|These are my 1,000,000+ contributions]]''' ([http://toolserver.org/~soxred93/count/index.php?name=koavf&lang=en&wiki=wikipedia breakdown claiming 50,000+ more], [http://toolserver.org/~river/cgi-bin/count_edits?user=Koavf&dbname=enwiki_p breakdown claiming 20,000+ more], [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=koavf&lang= cross-wiki breakdown], [http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?user=Koavf cross-wiki count], [http://toolserver.org/~luxo/contributions/contributions.php?user=koavf&lang=en recent cross-wiki edits]); I'm a [[Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of edits|fairly active Wikipedian]]—as far as I'm aware, I'm only the person to have a million edits to a single wiki. I think that Wikipedia is one of the few Internet communities worth joining, and the [[Anarchism|anarchistic approach]] to editing is its strongest feature. I generally edit articles concerned with [[politics]], [[philosophy]], [[religion]], or [[popular culture]], and I particularly try to represent the interests of [[truth]] and the [[Sahrawi]]s of [[Western Sahara]] ([[Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic|SADR]]). To that end, I created the '''[[Portal:Western Sahara|Western Sahara Portal]]''', '''[[:Category:Western Sahara stubs]]''', '''[[Template:Western sahara to-do]]''', and the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Western Sahara|Western Sahara Project]]'''. Every now and again, I'll [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting|sort stubs]], categorize pages, move misnamed articles, [[Wikipedia:Double redirects|fix double redirects]], or click on the [[Special:Random|random page link]] and do what I can.
In terms of my English editing preferences, I am an American from the Midwest and I try to have proper (American) grammar. As you can see from my userboxes, I use single spacing between sentences, I do not use singular they or gender neutral pronouns of any stripe (although I will sometimes just try to avoid it altogether; otherwise, I will universally use "he"), etc. That having been said, I read a lot of British media, so I use some British constructions in my everyday speech and editing (e.g. "R.E.M. '''are''' an alternative rock band.") I also use ISO dates and "[[wikt:persons|persons]]" as the plural for "[[wikt:person|person]]" (rather than "[[wikt:people|people]].") If you notice me being inconsistent in my English usage, please let me know, as it's a concern of mine.
In terms of my English editing preferences, I am an American from the Midwest and I try to have proper (American) grammar. As you can see from my userboxes, I use single spacing between sentences, I do not use singular they or gender neutral pronouns of any stripe (although I will sometimes just try to avoid it altogether; otherwise, I will universally use "he"), etc. That having been said, I read a lot of British media, so I use some British constructions in my everyday speech and editing (e.g. "R.E.M. '''are''' an alternative rock band.") I also use ISO dates and "[[wikt:persons|persons]]" as the plural for "[[wikt:person|person]]" (rather than "[[wikt:people|people]].") If you notice me being inconsistent in my English usage, please let me know, as it's a concern of mine.
In terms of my English editing preferences, I am an American from the Midwest and I try to have proper (American) grammar. As you can see from my userboxes, I use single spacing between sentences, I do not use singular they or gender neutral pronouns of any stripe (although I will sometimes just try to avoid it altogether; otherwise, I will universally use "he"), etc. That having been said, I read a lot of British media, so I use some British constructions in my everyday speech and editing (e.g. "R.E.M. are an alternative rock band.") I also use ISO dates and "persons" as the plural for "person" (rather than "people.") If you notice me being inconsistent in my English usage, please let me know, as it's a concern of mine.
In terms of my editing strengths, I think that I am generally good at things like adding categories, media, references, and templates; copyediting and formatting; suggesting structures to articles or adding links; and sometimes at adding prose. That is my weakest area by far—the actual content of the text—and the part that I struggle with the most when attempting to get articles to good or featured status. I am pretty clueless about how to structure several kinds of articles which are popular on Wikipedia: many related to sciences, military history, biographies, or transportation. I have a pretty good idea of how to write an article on albums and some other pop culture topics, some topics in philosophy and social sciences, and some list articles.
Since this is the case, all persons are the things in the universemost like God, and have immeasurable dignity and worth. This dignity is expressed in rights, the primary of which is the right to life. Humans have been given a rationalwill to make moral decisions, and the most fulfilling way of life is one characterized by love and genuine reciprocity between persons; the greatest love being charity. Persons are the only things which can be said to truly exist, and humans are unique among animals in our capacity to reason, use language, make choices, create art, have projects, create meaningful relationships, and we have souls. Since humans do nothing to merit personhood, there is also nothing they can do to lose it; their rights are immutable, equal, and non-transferable. Even if we have disagreements with others, we must respect their moral and rational autonomy.
This respect is also a moral imperative, since by demonstrating love toward God's creations, we demonstrate love to God also. God has entered into history at various times to guide the course of human affairs, but is more likely to act through persons on an individual level. To all who ask for wisdom, or truth, it is given in abundance, and perseverance is given to those who need it in times of trial. The greatest guide that has been given to humanity to help them understand the universe and their place in it is the Bible, and the greatest instance of divine intervention in human affairs is the incarnation of JesusChrist. It is because of His sacrifice that we can achieve salvation and mysticalunion with God. This is open to all persons, including those who have never known His name. Ultimately, it is impossible for any human to know who will be saved, as it is an intensely personal matter and relies on God's unknowableeconomy. We can only control our words, actions, and beliefs in this life. It is imperative that persons of the faith unite under the essentials of Christianity and maintain genuine and sincere attempts at healing the world with members of other faith communities.
Ultimately, there are several philosophies that contain some truth, but not all of them share it in equal measure. A philosophy can only be ultimately useful if it is holistic, that is, it takes into account all of the kinds of experiences that persons have. Humans are made up of several overlapping dimensions, none of which is most important or real, and all of which are dependent on the others for their fullest expression: the spiritual, mental, emotional, physical, and social. Our spiritual life is constituted by our relationship to God, beliefs about other persons, intentions toward others, priorities and affections, and love. The mental component of our lives includes memory, personality and temperament, imagination, logical reasoning, creativity, and volitional will. We have a wide range of emotions: happiness, anger, sadness, and more. None of them is invalid, and all of them should be exercised at some time. Our bodies are our most important possessions, and we should take care that they operate in the best condition; if our brains are lazy, so then will our minds be. We are not identical to our bodies, but are embodied creatures and there is nothing inherently wrong with this; it is a part of the created order. Lastly, humans are social creatures, and in creating relationships with others, we learn invaluable truths about ourselves and the world around us.
I agree to release my text and image contributions, unless otherwise stated, into the public domain. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under public domain terms, please check the multi-licensing guide.
All contributions by this user are hereby released into the public domain
I, the author, hereby agree to waive all claim of copyright (economic and moral) in all content contributed by me, the user, and immediately place any and all contributions by me into the public domain, unless otherwise noted. I grant anyone the right to use my work for any purpose, without any conditions, to be changed or destroyed in any manner whatsoever without any attribution or notification.
.svg){kind=small}
MediaWiki: H·U·T·C
.svg){kind=small}
