:I reverted the removal of the category from [[Ashva]]. IMO, the article is about the Sanskrit word and its Indo–European roots rather than a mythological concept even if it doesn't appear so currently. [[User:CorrectKnowledge|<font style="color:white;background:#167FF7;font-family:sans-serif;">'''Correct Knowledge'''</font>]][[User_talk:CorrectKnowledge|<font style="color:#167FF7;background:white;font-family:sans-serif;"><sup>«৳alk»</sup></font>]] 04:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
:I reverted the removal of the category from [[Ashva]]. IMO, the article is about the Sanskrit word and its Indo–European roots rather than a mythological concept even if it doesn't appear so currently. [[User:CorrectKnowledge|<font style="color:white;background:#167FF7;font-family:sans-serif;">'''Correct Knowledge'''</font>]][[User_talk:CorrectKnowledge|<font style="color:#167FF7;background:white;font-family:sans-serif;"><sup>«৳alk»</sup></font>]] 04:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
EDITING FOR THE SAKE OF IS JUST PUTTING ONE NAME OUT THERE IN GRAND EGO.
Revision as of 17:06, 12 February 2013
If I've deleted an article you created and you are here to protest, please clearly state the name of the article in the header of your note on the bottom of my talkpage so I can investigate. Remember to sign your posts with ~~~~.
Amazing job. I'd give you another barnstar for doing that difficult dabbing but I already gave you one! Mmm AFDs. I see what you mean.♦ Dr. Blofeld19:39, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I read those discussions (rather the second one). There is no consensus there to change the MOS page that I can see. Please show the specific agreement - it should be on the MOS talk page, otherwise, the (non-consensual) change shall need to be removed. At the very least, you should explain your change on the MOS page. thank you --Merbabu (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
MoS
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
I can see you feel strongly about this. It's quite hard for me to see why you can't see that your behaviour is inappropriate but I'll try. First, whenever you find yourself reverting against multiple editors that is a good sign that consensus isn't where you think it is. Secondly, you can't have it both ways; you are clearly way too involved to perform administrative functions like closing discussions, determining consensus etc. I am equally unable to perform administrative functions here as I have been involved in flag discussions in the past. I think you should pull back from the extreme position you are taking. --John (talk) 08:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Carlossuarez, you have gone beyond amazing me -- by "warning" me you are actually threatening to block me -- this is an abuse of your position as an admin. Case in point: some months ago you unilaterally add the WP:GEOGRAPHY footnote, and then -- when it is deleted -- you contend that "Project members" discussed the addition. You re-add the footnote with edit summaries that says it was deleted by non-Project members when you, yourself, are not a member of the Project. In any event, the addition of that footnote contravenes the LOCALCONSENSUS guidance! I think your original footnote was an attempted end-run around the MOS FLAG and ICON guidance. I sought to discuss the topic on the Project page, wondering if it was an appropriate location for the discussion. So what happens:
At 04:14 (UTC) 12 Feb, I suggest we move the discussion.
At 19:01 (UTC) 12 Feb, you closed the discussion, based on an invented "consensus" from Project members -- even though not a single listed member of the Geography Project had contributed to the discussion. And you invited editors to "mosey" over to another discussion, even without setting up an appropriate discussion.
At 01:33 (UTC) 13 Feb I invited editors to go to the settlement infobox discussion that I started to hash out the FLAGCON discussion. (And posted notices of the discussion elsewhere.) You participated in that discussion without any complaint about its' location. Moreover, I am the one who researched the numbers as to how many settlement FAs & GAs articles had FLAGCONS on them. And you have used the results of my research to support your arguments. And now you say that I "unilaterally" started a discussion on the GEOGRAPHY talk page and I "unilaterally" moved the discussion?!
Again, the sequence was 1. I suggest moving discussion to more appropriate page; 2. You seem to agree that the discussion should move and close the discussion on the Project page. 3. I set up a discussion on the settlement box page. 4. We seem to reach a consensus on the infobox page. And, 5. As the Project footnote is clearly out of accordance with MOS Guidance, I delete the footnote and I (again) cite the Guidance to support the deleting.
Carlossuarez, the only appropriate course of action for you is to apologize for your abusive conduct and support the deletion of the Footnote.--S. Rich (talk) 23:07, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Also, your "so what? you gonna sue them, block them?" comment is a snide WP:NPA. E.g., I have declared what my profession is on my talk page and I am not an admin, so the comment is clearly directed towards me and does nothing to improve WP.--S. Rich (talk) 23:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
To the bigot or bigots who have wikistalked me and vandalized my talk page: rather than anger, I feel pity that your life/lives are so miserable that you get your kicks this way. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:51, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I've very impressed by the way you stood your ground and were instrumental in making headway over the flag issue. I wasn't certain it was worth it but you've proved otherwise. I suspect that we'll still have problems from time to time but I really appreciate what you did and hope editing will be more pleasurable from now on. Its great to see you resuming anyway.. ♦ Dr. Blofeld21:05, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi ! Thank you for beginning the great job of creating Iranian county templates.That seems to be a difficult and time consuming task.In the new templates , in the closing lines , after the <noinclude> , if we leave some extra lines , the result will be some lines free . Don't know is it necessary or not . I mean this change : [1] . If the extra lines are unnecessary , then let's change the other templates and the coming ones.--Alborz Fallah (talk) 06:25, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Extra lines does affect the end result display. As an example please compare these two :
Well , I think that is important because I encountered the same problem after I made all templates of Iranian provinces and that caused me to change them all. I looked it up in Chrome and it turned out to be the same as Firefox .the view in Chrome--Alborz Fallah (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Mianej, Qazvin has no extra lines because 1-The article has only one box template and 2- I have changed the problematic extra lines in this edit :[2] previously . But as another example try this :
As you see , the Azna County template which still have extra lines , makes three lines empty after it , but Lorestan Province template does not makes any lines empty after it . --Alborz Fallah (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Kamard Industrial Complex, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Kamard. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 19:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
So 3 out of 31 provinces done? Yikes, excellent work though! See you're doing Tehran province. Have you got data on the neighborhoods of Tehran? Like Doolab etc ♦ Dr. Blofeld20:11, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Diacritics
Where did we have a consensus on avoiding diacritics in titles? As far as I remember, there wasn't any consensus on that.Alefbe (talk) 19:54, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Takyeh-ye Armut, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Armut. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 02:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I see this error "The resource you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is temporarily unavailable." I can't reach the files. emijrp (talk) 18:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the Internet Archive link to the |archiveurl= parameter. I don't think that censues are material for Wikisource but for Wikidata (not available yet). Anyway, the Excels are safe at Internet Archive. Regards. emijrp (talk) 19:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
We are supposed to be the same person
Hello me. My user page had a notice placed saying I'm a sockpuppet of Carlossuarez46. Your talk page, since reverted, said you are a sockpuppet of Bgwhite. Taking a look at your user page, I wouldn't mind if we were the same person. I can barely write in my native English, while you are a polygot. Since we are the same person, you wouldn't mind giving me some of my money? Bgwhite (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I see that you like to create new articles, so I guess you are concerned about Wikipedia coverage. I'm not sure if you know about my attempt to compile all notable topics, but I would like to read your opinion and possible improvements. Regards. emijrp (talk) 19:12, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Vahdat Kamrud, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Kamrud. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Tut, South Khorasan, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Darakht-e Tut, South Khorasan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 05:21, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Carlossuarez46. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Sarzeh, South Khorasan, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Amirabad-e Sarzeh. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 17:36, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Carlossuarez46. Re this comment: please help keep the tone of discussion collaborative and focused on article content, especially with regard to an article on a controversial subject. Thanks and happy wiki-editing. ☺Coppertwig (talk) 23:17, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
این مقاله را که خودم ساختم ، این مقالات هم چیز خاصی نداره ، فقط کافیه مقاله ای مثل این ساخته بشه.من برای ترجمه مشکل دارم ، اگر جعبه اطلاعاتش و نام ها ترجمه بشه خودم میسازمشان Javad YousefiTalk07:46, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Articles for creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. There are currently 2604 submissions waiting to be reviewed.
We would greatly appreciate your help. Currently, only a small handful of users are reviewing articles. Any help, even if it's just a few reviews, would be extremely beneficial.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Cheshmeh, Razavi Khorasan, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Cheshmeh Ali, Fariman. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 16:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hi, do you not think a village Narband of 98 with no secondary sources covering it beyond a list showing it's existence is a bit of a stretch for notability? IRWolfie- (talk) 18:20, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Carlossuarez46. You have new messages at IRWolfie-'s talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Zarkesh, Razavi Khorasan, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Kal Zarkesh. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry to report that there were not enough accounts available for you to have one. I have you on our list though and if more become available we will notify you promptly.
We're continually working to bring resources like Credo to Wikipedia editors, and this will very hopefully not be your last opportunity to sign up for one. If you haven't already, please check out WP:HighBeam and WP:Questia, where accounts are still available. Cheers, Ocaasi19:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Anqolab-e Do, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Anqolab-e Yek. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Carlossuarez46. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
OK fair enough, I rarely delete disambiguations anyway, which is presumably why I didn't realise the policy wasn't as watertight as I thought. Personally I don't lose much sleep over two item disambiguations, so I'll leave be in future. Sorry for the inconvenience, all the best Jimfbleak - talk to me?05:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Darreh Qaleh, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Ab Qaleh, Khuzestan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 22:18, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saruq District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saruq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Veysi for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
Hi, I'm Nithinravi. Carlossuarez46, thanks for creating Veysi!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider merging with Veysi, Behbahan
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 22:50, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Tombi Golgir, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Golgir. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
Hi, I'm Secretlondon. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Moribi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you've got any questions, please ask me on my talk page. Thanks, ~~
Followup RFC to WP:RFC/AAT now in community feedback phase
Hello. As a participant in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion article titles, you may wish to register an opinion on its followup RFC, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Abortion advocacy movement coverage, which is now in its community feedback phase. Please note that WP:RFC/AAMC is not simply a repeat of WP:RFC/AAT, and is attempting to achieve better results by asking a more narrowly-focused, policy-based question of the community. Assumptions based on the previous RFC should be discarded before participation, particularly the assumption that Wikipedia has or inherently needs to have articles covering generalized perspective on each side of abortion advocacy, and that what we are trying to do is come up with labels for that. Thanks! —chaos5023 20:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
CfD discussion of Category:Hawaiian players of American football
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Molashiyeh-ye Yek is a one line article, nothing about it convinces me it is notable. Not to mention I now find a better article about the same thing already exists. Please provide the guidelines that say all villages are notable. AnjwalkerTalk
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muhammad Shahi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kalat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
The problem is that none would be motivated to fix the issue you say because there is no documentation that covers it. There is nothing in policy, manual of style of short pages documentation to back up your request. Please add some documentation somewhere, then provide us a link so we can fix the issue.
Thank you that was very helpful. Would you mind taking a 1 month project to oversee that the capitalisation/District/Province thing is resolved in keeping with what has worked elsewhere? In ictu oculi (talk) 07:22, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If you are an admin, it would be nice if you could move the province articles from "Foo province" back to "Foo Province". Kauffner did unilaterally change this, contrary to Wikipedia practice. NVanMinh (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comma vs parentheses
You wrote: "Generally, administrative subdivisions and neighborhoods use parentheses rather than commas to introduce the disambiguating term" - is there any tool to extract all article names that
This was based on the clerk note "It seems that this [4] edit by ༆ along with [5] by NVanMinh is evidence enough to draw a link between the two and warrant a check." --- NVanMinh (talk) 07:07, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Saruq Rural District (Markazi Province), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Farmahin Rural District. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
I'd like to bring to your attention my post about the above-mentioned template, which you created, at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Azerbaijan. Thank you.
You were actually informed of this more than two years ago, but this seems to have missed your notice—or where none of the suggestions given there feasible? (Note that the website this template links to is completely unarchived.) הסרפד (Hasirpad) [formerly Ratz...bo] 05:04, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation
I disagree. For example, a disambiguation page with a single person on it, and a couple of objects that are derived from somebody's surname. That, in my opinion, would belong in Category:Surnames but not the one you created. By changing the category they are now wrong, and I don't particularly want to trawl through thousands of articles to find them.
Hello. I'm contacting you on behalf of TAJ Stansberry, you had deleted his wikipedia page and we wanted to know what we need to do to get it back up. TAJ is a reputable Music Video Director and we would really like to get his page back up and running. You can view his work on his website here:[1]Please let me know what steps need to be completed to get him back up. I work for his representative, you can check out our site here: [2] Thank you!Alilark (talk) 18:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and thanks for tagging this article for notability back in Jan 2008. It's still there and I've started a merge discussion. You may want to comment there, or take it to the Notability Noticeboard or AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
List
Hi Carlossuarez46. As a participant in this recent category deletion discussion, your input on this related list deletion discussion would be greatly appreciated. Best regards, Middayexpress (talk) 19:19, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Gol Darreh-ye Anuch, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Anuch. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
Hello, Carlossuarez46, and thank you for your contributions!
Some text in an article that you worked on Zagheh-ye Anuch, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Anuch. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Rahmanabad-e Anuch, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Anuch. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borborud until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Talkback
Hello, Carlossuarez46. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation. Message added 07:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Not sure if I am doing this right - new to wiki. Read Motya entry, wondering why no mention of Whitaker or his Foundation? He's the one who re-discovered Motya and consolidated isle property into one to preserve it and was responsible for years of excavations when archaeological world thought he was mad thinking this was Motya. Whitewolf420 (talk) 16:35, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pruning x words cats
I have tried to prune out articles on things from words cats, but as seen with Luau, including the very beligerent reactions to my explaining my reasoning for not classifying it in a word category on the talk page, moany editors are not willing to accept that word categories should not be put on articles on things. I am not sure what to do about this. People seem to want to miscategorize articles, and I am not sure how to do anything about it while avoiding an edit war.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:29, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the removal of the category from Ashva. IMO, the article is about the Sanskrit word and its Indo–European roots rather than a mythological concept even if it doesn't appear so currently. Correct Knowledge«৳alk»04:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
EDITING FOR THE SAKE OF IS JUST PUTTING ONE NAME OUT THERE IN GRAND EGO.
_001.jpg)
