User talk:Yoninah: Difference between revisions
Sagecandor (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 655: | Line 655: | ||
I hope you're right. I hope hooks get used after two weeks old if nominated previously on time. [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 15:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
I hope you're right. I hope hooks get used after two weeks old if nominated previously on time. [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 15:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Sagecandor}} what's your concern? Right now hooks are being promoted within about a month's time. There are those that are sitting longer, waiting for a re-review, but as we don't have so many reviewers, they will continue waiting until someone addresses them. As long as a hook is on the approved noms page, it will never be erased. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah#top|talk]]) 16:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
:{{ping|Sagecandor}} what's your concern? Right now hooks are being promoted within about a month's time. There are those that are sitting longer, waiting for a re-review, but as we don't have so many reviewers, they will continue waiting until someone addresses them. As long as a hook is on the approved noms page, it will never be erased. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah#top|talk]]) 16:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
::Oh okay great, thank you for the clarification, Yoninah, that's most reassuring ! [[User:Sagecandor|Sagecandor]] ([[User talk:Sagecandor|talk]]) 16:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:25, 2 July 2017
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
DYK for Zdenka Samish
On 3 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Zdenka Samish, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Czech-Israeli food technology researcher Zdenka Samish said that every fruit and vegetable can be made into jam? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Zdenka Samish. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Zdenka Samish), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Schwede66 01:51, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Divine Comedy illustrated by Botticelli DYK
Hi Yoninah. Sorry for disturbing you again, but this is a rather unusual case. The DYK has passed but I would like to ask your opinion regarding the picture of the DYK. It is the picture of a medieval manuscript and its quality is not great, although its importance is high. If you think it cannot be used as a DYK image, then perhaps, I may have to change the hook, or try to adjust the picture further. Please see the nom page. Any advice would be very welcome. Thank you again. Dr. K. 23:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Dr.K.: IMO the thumbnail image is very faint. We have so many other sharper and more colorful images that I personally wouldn't promote it. You could ask at WT:DYK to get other, more expert opinions. Best, Yoninah (talk) 19:22, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you Yoninah for your opinion. I may have to find another picture or leave it as is, to be promoted without a picture. Dr. K. 19:26, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
Prep 1
Hello Yoniah, is there anyway you can bump Template:Did you know nominations/John Henry Wise to Prep 1 with the image? I just realize I got the date of the Super Bowl this year wrong. If not it is fine. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
- I came to your talk page to enquire how the John Henry Wise nomination got moved from its special occasion slot to today, but now I see why! On another matter, what do you think of Template:Did you know nominations/Al Zab with regards to neutrality? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: the problem I see with the article is that it reads like a news report. For an article about a town, it doesn't say anything about the town. I'll post something on the nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
Nice improvements to the design of the The House of Houdini. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:52, 5 February 2017 (UTC) |
- Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 13:54, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Erez Komarovsky
On 10 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Erez Komarovsky, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while he was trained in classical French cuisine at Le Cordon Bleu, Israeli chef Erez Komarovsky prefers to cook with "couscous, olive oil, and goat cheese"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Erez Komarovsky. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Erez Komarovsky), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 12:03, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Ordnance Factory Board Mine Protected Vehicle
Thanks for the heads up. I did the needed corrections. Ominae (talk) 05:46, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Anna Stanislawska
11 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna Stanislawska, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 17th-century Polish poet Anna Stanisławska wrote about her life and three marriages as a series of 77 laments? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anna Stanislawska. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Anna Stanislawska, and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 15:36, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Yoninah Easy fix, in this is just a copy and paste from the other editor's talk page. That's all any of these manual notifications are. The DYK Update bot has been dead for the last two updates. However, I went by the nominations template rather than whatever was on the queue, since I had nothing to do with the queue, and the bot died before it got around to distributing the credits. You don't show up as a co-editor on the nom template, and I don't know the background on why it was out there since May 2016. But hope this works for you. — Maile (talk) 19:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Maile66: I added myself to the co-creation credits after fixing up this nomination that was never transcluded. Thank you for taking care of this. Yoninah (talk) 20:02, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
No inclusion criteria specified for the inclusion of this non-free image in this specific article (AGAIN)
I've warned a number of you about this. You promoted an article at DYK which was illegally using a non-free image. Please don't do that again. For you information, it was Jeff Forshaw's article, I've fixed it for you once again. Please try not to let this happen ever again. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: sorry, it wasn't me. Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Mifter The Rambling Man (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hi TRM, its good to see you again. I've been away for a few years so please forgive me for not noticing that errant non-free image. Its something that I don't recall being a major issue at DYK in the past however thank you for letting me know, I will keep an eye out for it going forward. Best, Mifter (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- Mifter The Rambling Man (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Sue Anschutz-Rodgers
On 15 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sue Anschutz-Rodgers, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that over a 22-year period, Colorado cattle ranch owner Sue Anschutz-Rodgers increased her stock from 33 cows and a single bull to 1,700 head of cattle? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sue Anschutz-Rodgers. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sue Anschutz-Rodgers), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 22:46, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah, this is now on the Nominations page under January 23. The reason it isn't on the Approved page any more is that it was promoted from there to Prep 2 despite your "/" being the most recent icon; so I restored it to Nominations after I pulled it from prep to avoid it happening again. (My feeling is that pulled nominations should go to the Nominations page anyway, since they should have an icon on them indicating that the nomination is not, at the moment, approved or eligible for promotion.) I imagine that, given a bit of time, a hook that satisfies everyone will be proposed and approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset: I thought you said in the WT:DYK announcement of the new approvals page that nominations that have been approved but still need work should stay on the approvals page. But it makes sense to return them to the nominations page. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 09:41, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
- No, that was EEng. I don't agree with him, but ultimately it's a consensus call, assuming we come to one. Softwarewise, they do stay: the bot doesn't move them back from Approved to Nominations (so they don't automatically get moved back), but once an approved hook is promoted and subsequently pulled, it needs to be added back somewhere; I personally think the Nominations page is best, since a manual step has to be done regardless. I also wouldn't object if someone decided to manually move hooks back once it's determined they need more work. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:26, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
March 2017 at Women in Red
![]() Women's History Month worldwide online editathon Facilitated by Women in Red | ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
A brownie for you!
![]() |
Hi, thank you for copy-editing the article Murder of Joey Fischer. Your work does not go unnoticed! I appreciate the contributions you did, keep up the great work. I noticed you didn't have a virtual brownie so here it goes! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 21:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC) |
- And now thank you again, this time for your edits on Mark Kilroy's article! My English isn't always 100% across the board and these copyedits are really appreciated.
ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 23:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- @ComputerJA: My pleasure. I was really impressed by the research you did on this one. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Henri Beau
On 1 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Henri Beau, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that while studying art in Paris, impoverished Canadian painter Henri Beau copied eleven paintings hanging in the Louvre and sold them to support himself? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Henri Beau. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Henri Beau), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, please do. I've added all that I could find - astonishing about the grandfather. I had the privilege of being in the market at night on a recent visit to Jerusalem;amazing scent, the little restaurants, the get-together over beer at little bars, the paintings - certainly the most fun art gallery I've ever been in.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:50, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Writer's Barnstar |
For all the times you take a paltry page, and turn it into an encyclopedic article. E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:14, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
- @E.M.Gregory: Thank you so much! Yoninah (talk) 12:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah, were you planning to return to this to see whether the close paraphrasing issues you noted had been taken care of? If you'd prefer someone else to look at it, I could always ask Nikkimaria. Please let me know. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Shmuel Schecter
On 4 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shmuel Schecter, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Canadian-American student Shmuel Schecter finished his four-year high school requirements in three years so that he could go to Poland to study at the Mir Yeshiva at age 17? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shmuel Schecter. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Shmuel Schecter), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Precious five years!
![]() | |
Five years! |
---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:41, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you, Gerda Arendt. Yoninah (talk) 00:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Helen Marie Black
On 8 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helen Marie Black, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that besides reporting on Aimee Semple McPherson's visit to Denver in 1921, Helen Marie Black arranged publicity stunts to show off the evangelist's preaching and faith healing skills? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Marie Black. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helen Marie Black), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Hannah Johnson Carter
Thank you, Yoninah, for Template:Did you know nominations/Hannah Johnson Carter! --Rosiestep (talk) 20:44, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Hannah Johnson Carter
Hello! Your submission of Hannah Johnson Carter at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC) — Maile (talk) 22:03, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
ninas → NINAs
I've reverted your lowercasing of these in Al Hirschfeld. As I wrote in the edit summary,
- These refer to the name "NINA" written all in capital letters. That's what most people know them as; lowercase "nina"/"ninas" just looks weird and wrong.
If you Google Hirschfeld NINAs, you'll see quite a few references to "NINAs", lots to "Ninas", and few if any to "ninas". Only the crossworders seem to use that form, and with their specialized meaning. I've kept (restored after the reversion) your link to wikt:nina, refining it to point to just the English sense (wikt:nina#English), and quoted the definition in an explanatory note. --Thnidu (talk) 05:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Thnidu: No problem. Yoninah (talk) 12:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah, I wasn't sure whether you saw that Fowler&fowler has posted saying that the issues you raised with this nomination have been addressed. Please let me know if you'd like me to find another reviewer. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Therese Benedek
On 13 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Therese Benedek, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Therese Benedek submitted to a five-month training analysis under an associate of Freud before embarking on her own career in psychoanalysis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Therese Benedek. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Therese Benedek), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helen Bonfils, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Broadway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Murder of Dora Bloch
On 13 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Murder of Dora Bloch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that after the disappearance of Dora Bloch, Britain cut all diplomatic ties with Uganda? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Murder of Dora Bloch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Solomon Souza
On 14 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Solomon Souza, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the stalls of a Jerusalem shuk close, Solomon Souza's spray-painted portraits (example pictured) become visible? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Solomon Souza. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Solomon Souza), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Tren Interurbano de Pasajeros Toluca-Valle de México
Hi! Please check the nomination page for Tren Interurbano de Pasajeros Toluca-Valle de México. I have submitted a reply to your comment on the title change. FunksBrother (talk) 01:00, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah, in an unfortunate bit of timing, your review of this nomination on February 16 was completed two hours after TempleM's most recent Wikipedia edit; it's been three and a half weeks since then, and there has been no response, nor is there likely to be. Did you want to try addressing the hook issues yourself, or find someone who is willing to try? If not, we're rapidly approaching the point where we'll need to give a deadline for settling the matter, and if it comes to that, marking it for closure for having an inadequately supported hook. Thanks for whatever you can do here. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- @BlueMoonset:
Done. Yoninah (talk) 20:39, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you! Glad it's set. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Maymie
Your comment that it wasn't cited, makes it seem as if the file should not have qualified for DYK, i.e. "to qualify for DYK, the hook facts must be cited in the article". It never occurred to me that Madame would even be questioned, as in my part of the world, this is common knowledge. When she became Mrs. Aiken, it was cited, with a source that tied in all of her names. Madame Aiken is Mrs. Aiken. "Madam ... used here as the title for married/widowed women of social standing." [1], "madame (the equivalent of 'Mrs')" [2] This is why I find the venue so frustrating. What you see as an uncited claim, I see as one that was already adequately cited. I have zero problem with ownership or actual critique that adds something, but DYK just seems like too much nitpicking. That isn't aimed at you personally, it repeatedly occurs from multiple participants. I get that you are just trying to prevent problems later down the road and I appreciate that it isn't easy, but it is why I have pretty much stopped contributing to DYK. SusunW (talk) 17:47, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Fay E. Davis
![]() | On 15 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fay E. Davis, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that 50 years after a mural by Fay E. Davis depicting Native Americans in battle was installed in the post office in Oglesby, Illinois, a janitor claimed it was pornographic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fay E. Davis. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Mifter (talk) 00:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Helen Bonfils
On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helen Bonfils, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Denver, Colorado, philanthropist Helen Bonfils inherited US$14 million from her father and US$10 million from her mother? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Bonfils. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helen Bonfils), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Does my response + edits address your concern? HaEr48 (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK
Requesting a "re-tick" at Template:Did you know nominations/Banana pasta. As long as that question mark symbol is there, promoters will likely just skip by the nomination ad infinitum, despite it being approved. North America1000 16:38, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
See Template:Did you know nominations/Banana pasta and also my talk page. Thanks. North America1000 17:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Article assessments
Maybe you don't assess too many Irish articles but can you please avoid using the old redirect templates, such as {{WP Ireland}} for WikiProject Ireland assessments but the current {{WikiProject Ireland}} instead, as you did here. Just a friendly heads up, thanks. ww2censor (talk) 18:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Freeman family murders
Really. I am away all weekend and I come back to find you've deleted my article Freeman family murders. I spent hours developing it and putting in research. You don't need to delete the article do you? If there's copyright issues then tell me before deleting it so I can correct them. I don't see how this can be when I retrieved the perpetrators D.O.B.s from prison records that are not available in any news site or article, this is all original research. Please revert the article to how it was so I can correct the minor copyright issues rather than just disabling the page completely... The article was getting 100+ views a day https://tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews/?project=en.wikipedia.org&platform=all-access&agent=user&range=latest-20&pages=Freeman_family_murders. It is a well known case and I don't appreciate you just deleting it without giving me a chance to fix it. A serious topic like this that needs wiki coverage is not a good thing to just remove all of a sudden. Please revert it or allow me to and I'll fix it tomorrow. Inexpiable (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Well why can't I just change it now then on the normal page and problem solved? No need to go through all this is there. Tell me personally about the copyrighted stuff and I can fix it starting tomorrow. So can I delete the note and just start removing the copyright stuff? Inexpiable (talk) 21:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Inexpiable: you can try, but I'm not sure you're allowed to. I went through each source using this tool. Yoninah (talk) 21:57, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Ok thanks useful tool. 65%. Most of it is related to one particular sub section in the page which isn't even mainly about the murders. Lol come on man I can fix that in 10 minutes was all of this really necessary? Not having a go but maybe something to think about in the future, at least give a user a chance to change it when it's something so simple. Inexpiable (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Inexpiable: Sorry. It didn't look simple. And you didn't seem to be bothered by it when the DYK reviewer mentioned it. Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I meant in terms of it being featured in DYK, not the copyright violations. I've made a start now and got it down from 65% to 49%. I don't know what's considered acceptable, I'm assuming this isn't good enough and it needs to be under 40? A lot of it is to do with quotes stated by the suspects however rather than what is written in the article. Surely quotes from the suspects themselves should not count as copyright issues? The earwig tool doesn't seem to pick up on that. Inexpiable (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Inexpiable: "Acceptable" means that word-by-word and sentence-by-sentence copying is not present. WP:LIMITED is allowed for things that cannot be described any other way, such as the murder instrument or the criminal sentencing. The previous version, however, copied whole paragraphs describing the murders verbatim from the sources. You are allowed to reprint short quotes, or put quotes around sentences you pull from a source, but the quoting should not be extensive. When I review an article for copyvios, I do not rely on the Earwigs percentage, but look at each source. Even something that gets a 15% on Earwigs can contain copyvios. Yoninah (talk) 13:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: I meant in terms of it being featured in DYK, not the copyright violations. I've made a start now and got it down from 65% to 49%. I don't know what's considered acceptable, I'm assuming this isn't good enough and it needs to be under 40? A lot of it is to do with quotes stated by the suspects however rather than what is written in the article. Surely quotes from the suspects themselves should not count as copyright issues? The earwig tool doesn't seem to pick up on that. Inexpiable (talk) 12:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Inexpiable: Sorry. It didn't look simple. And you didn't seem to be bothered by it when the DYK reviewer mentioned it. Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Ok thanks useful tool. 65%. Most of it is related to one particular sub section in the page which isn't even mainly about the murders. Lol come on man I can fix that in 10 minutes was all of this really necessary? Not having a go but maybe something to think about in the future, at least give a user a chance to change it when it's something so simple. Inexpiable (talk) 22:01, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Really don't see how I'm meant to rephrase "the car he was driving ran out of gas in Missouri". We're under 50% now surely it's good enough? The other descriptions are good and factual so they can't really be reworded. Inexpiable (talk) 21:13, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Inexpiable No, they're copyvios. If you can't figure out how to reword things, ask at WP:GOCE. Yoninah (talk) 22:09, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonfils Memorial Theatre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marquee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
You interested?
Don't know if you are interested, but I've run across a whole family of notables while working on Nina Simonovich-Efimova. Her mom had Jewish heritage and created the first kindergartens in Russia; her dad was a noted pediatrician, her husband was her business partner, the couple founded the Efimovs' Puppet Theatre, etc. There's lots of red links to be worked and additional details to clear up before it can go for GA, but it looks promising. If you have interest in working on any of it, please do. SusunW (talk) 15:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Cups (song)
I reverted you at Cups (song), and added a reference to the video. See Wikipedia:These are not original research#Works of fiction and non-fiction: "A ... film, or other work of fiction is a primary source for any article or topic regarding that work. Anything that can be observed by a reasonable person simply by ...watching the work itself, without interpretation, is not original research, but is reliance upon a primary source."--Srleffler (talk) 05:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Srleffler: thanks for the heads-up. Yoninah (talk) 10:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi Yoninah. What should've been a straightforward DYK nom has turned out to be a long-winded discussion over whether the article was actually a copyvio (even though I had already provided a Duplicate Detector diff. Could I trouble you to have a look and give your two cents? Much appreciated. —Bloom6132 (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review, Yoninah! Just one question – how did you get the 2,681 character count? When I said I increased the article to 2,733 characters, I wasn't trying to inflate the amount. That's the number I got after inputting javascript:importScript('User:Dr pda/prosesize.js'); getDocumentSize(); into my URL bar. Just wondering what tool/script you utilize and whether it'd be more accurate for me to use it in the future. Cheers! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:01, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
April events at Women in Red
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) ----Rosiestep (talk) 18:41, 24 March 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello! I have responded to all your concerns, I think. Would you kindly review, and if it is good now, please give it the go ahead. Otherwise, please let me know what else is needed. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hello! Just wondering if we can move this forward? All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Women's History Month DYK hooks
Yoninah, I moved three more hooks into that section the other day, but I think that may end up being too many: the just-completed Prep 2 is led by one of the older ones, but none of the new three were selected. That leaves only one more set, Prep 3, which will run on March 31, before the month is over.
I can always move them back, though of course I'll wait until Prep 3 has been filled to do that. One of the hooks there was approved by Cwmhiraeth, so she won't be able to promote it if she's the one building Prep 3... Just thought you'd want to know. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:21, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
The DYK Medal
![]() |
The DYK Medal | |
It is my pleasure to award The DYK Medal to Yoninah for their exceptional contributions to the Did You Know project. Your work building hook sets, nominating articles, and generally keeping the project running is greatly appreciated and makes a tremendous difference. Thank you for all you do! Best, Mifter (talk) 00:18, 26 March 2017 (UTC) |
- Why, thank you, Mifter! Yoninah (talk) 14:51, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Bonfils Memorial Theatre
On 29 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bonfils Memorial Theatre, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent a congratulatory telegram upon the opening of the Bonfils Memorial Theatre in Denver? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bonfils Memorial Theatre. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bonfils Memorial Theatre), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Lucie Ingemann
![]() | On 30 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lucie Ingemann, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Danish artist Lucie Ingemann (pictured), known for her large altarpieces depicting biblical figures, also created flower paintings with religious and mystical themes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lucie Ingemann. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
DYK: What's Your Raashee?
Hey! I just saw that my hook was seen by many people. The film article was seen by 12, 540 times and the actress' article over 41,000 times. Where these things are added? I don't know much about these things. I will appreciate your help.Krish | Talk 04:59, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Krish!: Congratulations! I added What's Your Raashee? to the DYK Statistics page (see here). The hits for the actress' page don't count, since that page already existed. But now you see how adding a pretty face to a nomination drives up the hits! Best, Yoninah (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
You have mail. Gatoclass (talk) 12:59, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
For you
![]() |
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
Thank you for tackling the tasks of dealing with all 14 articles under my DYK, checking them and giving them a round of copyediting as well. It's people like you that makes Wikipedia successful MPJ-DK 22:03, 11 April 2017 (UTC) |
- @MPJ-DK: Thank you! That's very kind of you. Yoninah (talk) 23:52, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
Need a Help Regarding Wiki Article Creation
Starbucks2580 (talk) 07:26, 12 April 2017 (UTC) Hi Yoninah, I wrote an article about Vector Consulting, that is in draft file, Someone Commented Also but I did not Understand what mistake I did,I tried to connect that person but nothing happens can you please help me in this situation. Below I mentioned Draft URL https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Vector_Consulting
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 20:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Calvin999 20:56, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Yoninah, Iridescent didn't answer you on the nomination page but in reply to the DYK nomination of Selina Rushbrook|talk-page notice you made. Can you please take a look there, and decide how you wish to proceed? Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:35, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Train Track Park (Jerusalem), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Baka and German Colony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark
Hi! My above DYK-nom was removed from the prep-area by you for improvement purposes. I hope you didn't forget it. Besides, I can find the nom nowhere. Would you please advise also its location. Thanks. CeeGee 03:17, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
May 2017 at Women in Red
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's | ||
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 19:22, 28 April 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Improper use of non-free images
Hi Yoninah, you placed The Great Friendship into a prep today, but the lead image was a violation of fair use. I've fixed it but I thought you should know. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:48, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: thank you for catching that. I have uploaded free images myself, so I'm aware of the template that must be filled out. I did look at the template for this image, and thought it looked different from the ones I've done, but wasn't aware that it was a violation of fair use. Yoninah (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Nancy H. Hensel.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/32px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Nancy H. Hensel.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Maccabeats screenshot.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/32px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Maccabeats screenshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
Question about doing DYK reviews
Hi! I had messed up once, and crossed wires. You'd generously mentioned I could ping you with questions. I want to try again, but I can't figure something out. When I look at these ones, they all seem to say "reviewed", even when there is none of the information for a DYK review. Do I have to find one that doesn't even have that? Or does that refer to some other kind of review, not the DYK review? (Sorry if this is a mega-dumb question. I'd really like to contribute, but I'm finding it hard to work out how to.)Hildabast (talk) 00:18, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oh .... I think I get it... that's what they reviewed, not a review of that DYK. I'm going to give it a try! Hildabast (talk) 00:20, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
- I had a go, but I'm concerned I may have put the review in the wrong place. I'm so close to working out how to contribute usefully, just not quite there yet! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/My_Brother%27s_Husband Hildabast (talk) 00:58, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Beatrice Alexander
On 12 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Beatrice Alexander, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 90 years after Beatrice Alexander (pictured) founded the Alexander Doll Company, the company issued a doll in her likeness, priced at US$1,499.95? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Beatrice Alexander. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Beatrice Alexander), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 04:22, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Expansion to Kashruth Council of Canada?
Do you think this news story should be in the COR article under a new section titled "controversies"? hillelfrei(Talk) 14:44, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Hillelfrei: No. The stubby article will look unbalanced. Maybe you should expand the Kashruth Council of Canada article first. Yoninah (talk) 22:45, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added 22:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Article revised. North America1000 22:48, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Train Track Park
On 13 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Train Track Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Train Track Park, containing 7 kilometres (4.3 mi) of walking and biking trails, was built over the century-old route of the Jaffa–Jerusalem railway? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Train Track Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 04:10, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
Oyfn Pripetshik
I just linked to this song, "Oyfn Pripetshik", - can you help with the tagged layout? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:58, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: Done. Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Jon Schmidt
On 15 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jon Schmidt, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that classically-trained pianist Jon Schmidt augments his live performances by playing the piano with his toes and performing while upside-down? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jon Schmidt. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Jon Schmidt), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 03:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Wilhelmina Kekelaokalaninui Widemann Dowsett
Hello Yoninah. Can you possibly promote this DYK hook before the end of this month with the picture (or a crop of it)? The reason being May is Asian Pacific American Heritage Month. Thanks.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:27, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
June 2017 offerings @ WikiProject Women in Red
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's June 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 20:48, 24 May 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Images with DYK hooks
Hello Yoninah. I noticed that you moved the Puddletown DYK into Prep 6, but didn't include the image. Are there criteria for defining when an image is suitable for a hook? The reviewer didn't mention any problems with the image. The Puddletown DYK was the first time I have added an image to a hook, and I should like to know what the criteria are before I decide to do it again. PaleCloudedWhite (talk) 20:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
QPQ time frame
Is there a time frame for when a QPQ is needed? I reviewed a DYK nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Lady Hambro and 27 days without a review seems more than a bit too long. SL93 (talk) 20:32, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- @SL93: some nominators take longer than others. You just do the review and wait for BlueMoonset to come along and give an ultimatum :) Yoninah (talk) 20:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. I will do that. I guess nominators not doing a QPQ before the nomination doesn't sit right with me. SL93 (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- @SL93: I understand. But not everyone likes the QPQ rule. Yoninah (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ok. I will do that. I guess nominators not doing a QPQ before the nomination doesn't sit right with me. SL93 (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Another image
You should not have placed this nomination into the image slot in Prep 1. It is not approved for use with the image. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:09, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Oops, sorry about that. I just thought that the hook didn't work without an image. And I thought about how to incorporate statues into the hook, but it didn't seem to work. I moved the hook down in the queue. Yoninah (talk) 07:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
Schager
If you like you can add this nice story [3][4][5] of him rescuing Barenboim's Siegfried (in Siegfried), by stepping in for the tenor who was supposed to sing on shortest notice, at least for the first act. That was before his Siegfried in Götterdämmerung in Berlin, for which he was scheduled in 2013, and he had to sing Tamino, or was it 1. Geharnischter the same night. - I was lucky: heard both tenors and Barenboim this year. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- I just found - looking for something else - this detailed review [6] of reviews of that first Tristan appearance, reviews p. 52, story beginning p. 49, all worth reading, - also adding some, "intensity and authenticity"? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:50, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Narada sting operation
I have done some improvement to the article and its hook.Could you have a look at it?FORCE RADICAL (talk) 07:38, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Carmen Sandiego
Hi Yoninah, I noticed yesterday you moved a bunch of Carmen Sandiego video game articles from "Where in X Is..." to "Where in X is..." with the lowercase "is". Just a note that the original capitalisation was correct – as outlined at MOS:CT, some words like articles, prepositions and conjunctions are not capitalised in proper-name titles, but other short words including verbs (like "is") are capitalised. I've moved all of the articles back to their correct titles. 97198 (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @97198: well, that's news to me. I did it because another editor moved one of them. Glad you have the tools to make all the titles consistent. Yoninah (talk) 14:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi
My attention returned to Palestinian Authority Martyr's Fund today, and I began to improve it. Wondered if you think it would make an interesting DYK, and if you would help me continue the expand. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- @E.M.Gregory: Hi. I saw your note at the beginning of the week and thought it's a great article and something I'd like to contribute to. Then I got sick and have been on antibiotics ever since. If you can expand it 5 times by the 7-day deadline, I'll be happy to nominate it for DYK. Hopefully I'll even be able to work on it this weekend. Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
- Feel better. I'll do what I can.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:20, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well it is certainly more that 5 times expanded. On the other hand, the topic is so vast that it could fill a book, and I am not at all sure that I have done justice to it. I would be grateful for your opinion.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
- Decided to nominate it. Thanks.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK Question
Hi, Yoninah. Hope all is well. I nominated an article I recently created to DYK (see Template:Did you know nominations/Hotelito Desconocido). Do you think there is/could be a problem with the hook? There is an overwhelming amount of information on the hotel's alleged involvement in money laundering (reasonable belief for crime is different in the U.S. and Mexico, but both took legal action and shut down the hotel based on the evidences they had in hand). Since several of my recent nominations have been pushed back, I thought I'd reach out to an experienced DYK contributor like yourself for a second opinion. Thanks, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 23:43, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Janet Bonnema at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:44, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Jerry London (wrestler)
![]() | On 13 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jerry London (wrestler), which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that professional wrestler Jerry London worked in the main event of both the first and second EMLL 33rd anniversary show, three weeks apart? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jerry London (wrestler). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page. |
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
A cup of tea for you!
![]() |
Thanks for reviewing the article Narada sting operation at the DYK. You will be happy to know that on that day the veiws of the page shot upto 4093 hits [veiws] .Compared to the average 9 to 10 people who visit it on a normal day this was overwhelming. Thanks FORCE RADICAL (talk) 09:58, 13 June 2017 (UTC) |
- @Forceradical: that's great! And thanks for the nice cuppa! Yoninah (talk) 13:52, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK nominations
Hi. So I decided ot nominate it. But a message on my talk page says I did it wrong. I truly would appreciate you opinion on whether I should move forward with that nomination, or just drop it. I often think about taking some new article or other ot DyK, but the intricacy of the process daunts me. Perhaps I'll just stick to article content and avoid the tangles of red tape that I am too maladroit to handle. I am glad to see you editing again as I thank it to mean that you have overcome the illness.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Andreas Schager
On 14 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Andreas Schager, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Andreas Schager was called a "sensation" when he first performed Wagner's Tristan in Minden, and went on to Siegfried at the Staatsoper Berlin, La Scala, and The Proms? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Andreas Schager. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Andreas Schager), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for Abigail Franks
On 16 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Abigail Franks, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that letters written by Abigail Franks (pictured) to her son in England are peppered with family gossip, local politics, and observations on the state of Judaism in 18th-century colonial New York? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Abigail Franks. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Abigail Franks), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:12, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK for May Bonfils Stanton
On 19 June 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article May Bonfils Stanton, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that May Bonfils Stanton built an exact replica of Marie Antoinette's Petit Trianon château (pictured) on her estate in Lakewood, Colorado? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/May Bonfils Stanton. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, May Bonfils Stanton), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Vanamonde (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Can you put a Watch on my nomination - thanks!--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:51, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Another question about DYK reviews
G'day! How far back can you go to do one? On the page showing the nominations, it gets colored until quite recently: can you still review ones that were nominated in time, but are back in that shaded portion? Hildabast (talk) 01:39, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hildabast many people do QPQs around the same time they nominate their own article. But you can certainly list a QPQ you did a few months back. Yoninah (talk) 09:35, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Original Barnstar |
For your work looking over George Baldanzi. Much appreciated and a pleasure to work with you. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:52, 22 June 2017 (UTC) |
- @TonyBallioni: Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 22:53, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Let me know if my new wording for ALT 1 helps your concerns. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:20, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Hi, don't know if you're interested in this, but it was to Atlanta as what some of the ones were to Atlantic City.♦ Dr. Blofeld
- @Dr. Blofeld: Thanks, I'll take a look at it. Yoninah (talk) 11:52, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Elissa P. Benedek
Hello! Your submission of Elissa P. Benedek at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:24, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. It's a great article, and I think there are several interesting hooks that could be made, particularly regarding her academic career. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:25, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Thunderbolt (Savin Rock)
I wonder if you might reconsider part of this edit? I agree that it makes the hook more obvious, but it loses a lot of the hook appeal that made it interesting for people to click through to (particularly for a quirky last hook in the set). I don't think there was anything misleading in the hook as it stood. Thanks. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
- @IronGargoyle: I just thought it was totally vague. A "Thunderbird" could be anything. I could see readers passing on it rather than clicking out of curiosity. But I'll ask for other opinions at WT:DYK. Yoninah (talk) 19:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
July 2017 at Women in Red
![]() Welcome to Women in Red's July 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
![]() ![]()
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 02:56, 24 June 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK statistics
I want to add Batman and Harley Quinn to the DYK statistics page because it received over 15,000 views while one the main page, but I'm confused about the 15,000 and over list because it appears to not be in order by views. Does it not have to be in order? SL93 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- @SL93: congratulations! The 15,000 and over list is indeed organized by views, in descending order. Your entry of 15,542 page views would go right after Dismaland. Be sure to add it to the June page view chart, too. Yoninah (talk) 21:22, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was confused because Rico Harris pops up at 18,556 views where it shouldn't be. SL93 (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- @SL93: Right. This is a user-generated page, so mistakes are common. I'll move it. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again. SL93 (talk) 21:38, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- @SL93: Right. This is a user-generated page, so mistakes are common. I'll move it. Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks. I was confused because Rico Harris pops up at 18,556 views where it shouldn't be. SL93 (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the review
Thank you for the review of Template:Did you know nominations/New York Journal of Books.
Can you please revisit? Sagecandor (talk) 14:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean
Not sure what you mean by this question [7], but please, keep such unfounded queries to email or user talk page space, thanks !!! Sagecandor (talk) 20:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Chaudfroid sauce
You are invited to join the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Chaudfroid sauce. North America1000 22:22, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48
Prep 5 - Sovan Chaterjee
You promoted this while it still had a stub template, and per the talk page here, this article has already been in DYK. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: I didn't promote it, but I'll pull it from prep. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 11:17, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was in a rush this morning. Perhaps Cwmhiraeth should know. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:12, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Reply about 2 weeks
I hope you're right. I hope hooks get used after two weeks old if nominated previously on time. Sagecandor (talk) 15:46, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Sagecandor: what's your concern? Right now hooks are being promoted within about a month's time. There are those that are sitting longer, waiting for a re-review, but as we don't have so many reviewers, they will continue waiting until someone addresses them. As long as a hook is on the approved noms page, it will never be erased. Yoninah (talk) 16:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh okay great, thank you for the clarification, Yoninah, that's most reassuring ! Sagecandor (talk) 16:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)