Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spam: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Barek (talk | contribs)
→‎spinoff.com: +more, likely WP:COI in the additions
→‎degruyter.com: new section
Line 28: Line 28:
:Added additional account (Anitiya t) which began adding the link today. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 18:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
:Added additional account (Anitiya t) which began adding the link today. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 18:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
::Note: noticed today a likely [[WP:COI]] in the link additions. The usernames above each have noticeable similarity to the author listed in the target link being added by each user. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 19:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
::Note: noticed today a likely [[WP:COI]] in the link additions. The usernames above each have noticeable similarity to the author listed in the target link being added by each user. --- [[User:Barek|Barek]] <small>([[User talk:Barek|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barek|contribs]])</small> - 19:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

== degruyter.com ==

* {{Link summary|degruyter.com}}
* {{User summary|Kdeb2505}}
* {{User summary|ApeironDeGruyter}}

After seeing that the new account is citing only that domain, I ran a poke but it only showed one other blocked account, ApeironDeGruyter that had added it a few years ago. There are 300+ links to that site however but I don't know how many accounts may have added it. Needs further investigation.<br />&nbsp;—&nbsp;[[User:Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">Berean Hunter</span>]] [[User talk :Berean Hunter|<span style="font-family:High Tower Text;color:#0000ff;font-weight:900;">(talk)</span>]] 20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 6 March 2018

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/WikiProject used

    When reporting spam, please use the appropriate template(s):
    As a courtesy, please consider informing other editors if their actions are being discussed.
    {{Link summary|example.com}} -- do not use "subst:" with this template - Do not include the "http://www." portion of the URL inside this template
    • {{IP summary}} - to report anonymous editors suspected of spamming:
    {{IP summary|127.0.0.1}} --- do not use "subst:" with this template
    • {{User summary}} - to report registered users suspected of spamming:
    {{User summary|Username}} -- do not use "subst:" with this template

    Also, please include links ("diffs") to sample spam edits.

    Indicators
    Reports completed:
     Done
    no No action
     Stale
    Defer discussion:
     Defer to XLinkBot
     Defer to Local blacklist
     Defer to Global blacklist
     Defer to Abuse filter
    Information:
     Additional information needed
    information Note:

    Economics Network

    Does the article Economics Network look a bit promotional to you? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    spinoff.com

    links
    accounts

    Multiple WP:SPI user accounts adding promotional content into multiple articles, all using this one site which fails WP:RS. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 17:56, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Added additional account (Anitiya t) which began adding the link today. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 18:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: noticed today a likely WP:COI in the link additions. The usernames above each have noticeable similarity to the author listed in the target link being added by each user. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 19:33, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    degruyter.com

    After seeing that the new account is citing only that domain, I ran a poke but it only showed one other blocked account, ApeironDeGruyter that had added it a few years ago. There are 300+ links to that site however but I don't know how many accounts may have added it. Needs further investigation.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]