Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 19:57 on 8 July 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• Joe262626 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1122 (LTA 1122, details). Note: This filter has a large number of false positives. Use caution before blocking. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 17:26, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

  False positive. Edits are not vandalism. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:38, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

• 186.211.107.65 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 249 five times in the last 5 minutes (New user conducting large scale reverts, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:10, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

• Sfareed22 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 793 twice in the last 5 minutes (Common spam/scam phone numbers, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 19:08, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:14, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• 86.121.116.227 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 – Earlypsychosis (talk) 08:28, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. I just can't find the vandalism in the linked contributions Q ^{T C} 08:30, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Surely adding a lots of infoboxes to a lot of pages without edit summary is dubious? Gsmgm (talk) 08:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Have we stopped believing in WP:AGF? Regardless of the size of the wikitext, it added one small infobox that listed medal information, it'd be a really really far stretch to consider that vandalism. A friendly note to use edit summaries would be a lot better then blocking for doing nothing wrong. Q ^{T C} 08:38, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I've reminded him/her of the use of edit summary. Gsmgm (talk) 08:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)