Jump to content

User talk:RL0919: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
added Noble Soul section
Line 23: Line 23:


__TOC__
__TOC__

== Noble Soul ==
Richard, someone purchased your expired domain and is attributing your essays to "Anthony Mason."
[[User:Onlinetexts|Onlinetexts]] ([[User talk:Onlinetexts|talk]]) 16:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)


== Revision histories from deleted timelines ==
== Revision histories from deleted timelines ==

Revision as of 16:36, 10 April 2021

Noble Soul

Richard, someone purchased your expired domain and is attributing your essays to "Anthony Mason." Onlinetexts (talk) 16:36, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revision histories from deleted timelines

Hi RL0919. I have uploaded three (2014, 2015 and 2016) year-by-year, scaled-down versions of the recently deleted "Timelines of the war in Donbass", up to 2016, at least until now. I also got rid of all the questionable or plainy unreliable source (most of them of Russian origin), leaving only those which were deemed acceptable by the majority of users involved in the AfD discussion. As the administrator who closed the AfD discussion, I ask you whether it would be possible for you to restore the old timelines' revision histories (from 2014 to 2016) into the new lists. The core of the histories is in the following articles/redirects:

Some of the above mentioned pages (2016) were redirects containing the oldest histories. All the pages were removed per WP:TNT, a guideline that despite its name it's not only about erasing content, but also about starting over. I know this may be a huge job to do, but since the new timelines borrow large parts from the old ones, the good-faith contributions of other users should also be recognized (even the admin who proposed the deletion acknowledged this during the debate). Thanks in advance.--Darius (talk) 12:53, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@DagosNavy: I'm not sure I'm clear on what you are requesting. If you want the histories of these deleted articles to become part of the history of the new articles, as in a WP:History merge, I don't believe that is realistic to do in this case. The histories of the earlier articles overlap, so a history merge of them would be an unintelligible hash. There are are some other options:
  1. From an attribution standpoint, the simplest choice is not to re-use text that you can't attribute. It is too late for the three articles you already created, but it is an option to consider for any further articles in the series. (I do understand that this makes it significantly harder to write the new articles in the first place.)
  2. Undelete the previous histories and redirect the resurrected pages to the new ones. That's pretty easy to do, but might not go over well with some of the people who participated in the AfD. It could be seen as an end run to reverse the deletion.
  3. The option of "talk page attribution" is allowed, although not often used. I would need to pull the lists of contributors from the deleted histories, and place explanations on the new article talk pages that the new articles may contain some material contributed by them (with the relevant list shown).
Option 2 is the lowest initial effort, but I may prefer to go with option 3. I will look at the histories and think about it a bit, and get back to you next year. :-) --RL0919 (talk) 19:19, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the prompt reply. I was already working on the new articles, as agreed with a number of participants in the AfD, when the decision of deleting the old timelines was made. We don't know how many people would have accepted a merge, but I was hoping for a new extension of the talks. I think a redirect (option 2) would save a lot of work not only for you, but also for the contributors who edited these pages for years in good faith. I guess nobody can feel upset, excessive detail and unreliable sources (the main concern of the deletion proponent) would not be restored. A read-only display mode of the revision history (if possible) may be a way to reassure them that the old pages are gone forever. Thanks again, and see you next year ;)--Darius (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DagosNavy: Sorry for the delayed response, but after pondering I thought of a solution that should provide the best of both worlds: I can restore the histories, redirect, and then revision delete the content of all the older versions, leaving just the attributions visible. That way the AfD consensus to delete is respected, but all the users who may have contributed material used in the new pages are documented in the more typical way rather than on a Talk page. (And it's a lot less work.) So barring some unforeseen objection or difficulty, I will implement that solution within the next day. --RL0919 (talk) 17:37, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot, @RL0919:, that will save years of good-faith users' attribution while at the same time hiding the deleted content. Just a doubt, the edit summaries would also be preserved in that way?.--Darius (talk) 23:26, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@DagosNavy: Apologies for the very slow follow-up, but all the attribution histories are now restored. And yes, these do include the edit summaries. --RL0919 (talk) 02:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RL0919: I have no words to thank you enough for your arduous task, in the name of all the good-faith contributors to these chronologies. I am feeling extremely embarrassed to bother you again, but I will probably ask you to save the remaining histories later this year, when the new year-to-year timelines will be ready. Thanks again, you did a hell of work!--Darius (talk) 20:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Monday night National Football League games prior to 1970

Did you believe there was consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Monday night National Football League games prior to 1970 to merge all of the content in the list into History of Monday Night Football? Because the creator of the original article just did exactly that. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:33, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagles247: Clearly I did not. I've reverted the relevant edits and asked the editor in question to address the issue more appropriately. --RL0919 (talk) 06:24, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Undeletion of MS Faizal Khan

Sir, I far as I know, Mr Faizal Khan is a very eminent personality very well known in and out of Kerala. I have noticed a vote stating ,he haven't done anything more than a speech in UN General Assembly, sir...how many will get a chance like that without talent...Next I would like to qoute , he is the Person directly Nominated by the Hon. president of India as the first court member of Maulana Azad urdu university. I am not here to debate...but felt very sad for the deletion of a page which is there for past 9 years on personal grudges of voters. Kindly do the needful favor, if you can being on the side of truth. Vediad (talk) 06:29, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Vediad: Unfortunately, what you may personally know or believe about his prominence is not enough to keep an article about him on Wikipedia. In the deletion discussion, all of the other particpants believed there was not enough significant coverage about him to satisfy our notability requirements. Articles that just mention him briefly as part of a story about something else are not enough. So based on what I have seen, I cannot find a good reason to grant your request. If you want to pursue the matter further, you can file an appeal for Deletion Review. --RL0919 (talk) 06:53, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refund to my own space

Hi RL0919. I was thinking of working on an article on Itay Lukach and I noticed a previous article was AFDed and deleted. Can you please undelete the latest version and put it on User:Muhandes/Itay Lukach so I can see what was already done? Thanks in advance. --Muhandes (talk) 17:23, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Muhandes: Done as requested. --RL0919 (talk) 19:33, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. --Muhandes (talk) 19:58, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted rather than reasonably construed.
  • Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD decision was wrong

Sorry, but your decision over the draft about Thomas Clements was incorrect. It's wasting draft space and therefore Wikipedia resources. The creator is going to keep on going - he's already had this draft restored after it was deleted for inactivity all because his biased agenda demands it stay forever seeing as he thinks (despite being told four times) Clements is notable. There will never be any reliable sources. Like the last comment that said delete said, an exception to the rules needed to be applied. Please reverse your decision, ban Ylevental from editing and salt this draft space. 2001:8003:58A3:6C01:D0DC:C7CF:9CA2:4959 (talk) 21:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I cannot agree with your perspective on the situation. The arguments made by other editors for why the draft should be kept were on-point and aligned to our guidelines for why drafts should or should not be deleted. The primary author of the draft having a non-neutral POV is not in itself a sufficient reason for deletion. --RL0919 (talk) 23:38, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

173.235.7.86

May I please request immediate intervention with user:173.235.7.86 . AIV is backed up, and she clearly won't stop until blocked. CLCStudent (talk) 15:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just so you know, she made a threat of violence in her last edit. CLCStudent (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you today for The Unconquered (1940 play), about the Broadway play. "This tale of woe includes a leading lady trying to play a role half her age, an actor who took the saying "break a leg" a bit too literally, an author who had to get drunk to tolerate the dress rehearsal, and an embarrassing failure that led that author to permanently abandon writing for Broadway. Those are the real-life events, not the plot of the play!"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:47, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request regards article "Mersey Tri"

Hi, I noticed you deleted my article on Mersey Tri. I would appreciate having a copy of the page please as it took me a lot of work. I'd like to revisite the page and perhaps have it in DRAFT folder while I work on it please? Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Heron (talk • contribs) 14:31, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Heron: Restored as a userspace draft at User:Peter Heron/Mersey Tri. --RL0919 (talk) 15:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting usefull articles

Why did you delete "List of Instant Game Collection games" articles? These articles were very usefull and updated pretty regurlary. Amiiboilua (talk) 13:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Instant Game Collection games (North America) (2nd nomination), this was not the type of material that Wikipedia is intended to provide. The lists have been relocated to a more appropriate website here. --RL0919 (talk) 13:47, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Darcie Lanthier

I noticed that you deleted this page, and I was reviewing the AfD (what a mess). I noticed that all of the routine coverage that was offered for you to review was all very recent. I'm not necessarily arguing against the deletion, but I thought I'd offer a couple more sources for sustained coverage over time that's not necessarily directly related to her political campaigns: [1] [2]. Neither of those were covered in her bio but one is covered in Prince Edward Island Route 1. Just for your consideration. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:16, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: I don't know that those pieces alone would shift the result, but if there is more "undiscovered" coverage (or new coverage appears) that could change opinions, the reasonable option would be to put an article into draft – whether in user space or draft space. That would allow more feedback on the sourcing before taking another run at mainspace. --RL0919 (talk) 18:30, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I think that's a good approach. If I come across any more separate coverage I'll consider writing a new draft. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:21, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Open proxies

Hi RL0919, I'm writing to you because you're a sysop and maybe you could give me the information I need. If I suspect that certain IP addresses are open proxies, whom should I ask to check them and discover whether they actually are or they are not? Thanks! 151.30.109.206 (talk) 08:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not my area of expertise, but if you suspect an address, it appears you can report it at Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies#Reporting. You can also check Category:Open proxies blocked on Wikipedia for addresses that are already blocked as open proxies. Hope that helps. --RL0919 (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you RL0919 (-: 151.30.96.222 (talk) 14:05, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Unconquered (1940 play) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that The Unconquered (1940 play) has been scheduled as WP:TFA for 13 February 2020. Please check that the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/February 13, 2020. Thanks! Ealdgyth - Talk 21:39, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review deletion of Kosmos Holding

Hello, I would like to request the un-deletion of Kosmos Holding. I see many primary, and independent mention and focused coverage of this company. As well as many mentions and references to it within the wikipedia community from very notable Wikipedia article and figures (Davis Cup, FC Andorra, Hiroshi Mikitani, Gerard Pique, and more) I would like to review the reasons for deletion and edit the article to improve based on comments made by users please let me know! Thank you. (Sarahjua12 (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahjua12 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Given the history of that article, which was started by a user who was later blocked for abuse of multiple accounts, I don't think it would be wise for me to restore it for an editor with a freshly created account. If you want to pursue the restoration of the article, you can appeal to Deletion Review using the instructions found on that page. --RL0919 (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen

I was quite dismayed to find this article had been deleted, as I very much enjoyed reading the information contained within it. According to the archived deletion discussion, anyone wanting the text of the article can request it from you. May I please have the text of this article, or a link to it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwalexan (talk • contribs) 20:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Dwalexan: That should be no problem. Do you want it reacreated as a draft page in your user space, or would you prefer it sent to you by email? And if the latter, do you want the plain text or the wikicode? --RL0919 (talk) 13:40, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RL0919: Thank you for your help. I think I'll try the draft page option, for now at least. If I change my mind, I'll be sure to let you know. Thank you, again! Dwalexan (talk) 17:25, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Dwalexan: It has been restored and placed at User:Dwalexan/World of The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. --RL0919 (talk) 04:51, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [3]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About ComputerSupport.com WIKI page deletion

Hello! I saw that you deleted ===ComputerSupport.com=== wiki page. The page was live for about 4 years. I assume that someone edited the page with some information about one of the founders - Kirill Bensonoff in the attempt to create a Wiki page for him and mentioned an Amazon url. However, the ComputerSupport.com wiki page, as it was before that edit included relevant information about the company, the cooperation with CITRIX etc. Could you please reactivate the page?

Let me know.

Thank you,

Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.106.124.191 (talk) 16:49, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the article as the result of the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ComputerSupport.com. One participant there mentioned the Amazon link, but the general problem was the absence of evidence that the company meets our notability standards, in particular the ones for organizations. An article can be very informative but still be about a subject that is not notable. Nothing in what you said above makes me think that isn't the case here, so I have no basis to overturn the result of the deletion discussion. --RL0919 (talk) 21:05, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your reply! The collaboration between ComputerSupport.com and CITRIX has been nothing but notable (https://finance.yahoo.com/news/computersupport-com-launches-next-generation-181630428.html). Basically, together we worked at launching a new generation of cloud hosting powered by Citrix Netscaler® VPX, Citrix XenApp® and Citrix XenMobile®. We built ITAnyWhereCloud, a trademark, a faster, more scalable cloud solution with a focus on providing substantial savings over the on-premise infrastructure. Also, a Wikipedia admin has approved the page 4 years ago. It was live since then. Why wouldn't be notable anymore?
Let me know your thoughts.
Mike
P.S. Since 2017 I stopped the collaboration with ComputerSupport.com, but I still consider it notable and I've shown you why.
Apologies for the slow reply; I've not been on WP much the past several days. Unfortunately, I do not see anything in your comments that changes what I said above. Our notability standards are based on how subjects are covered in independent reliable sources, not on marketing-style assertions about new generations, trademarks, etc. If you disagree with my response and want to pursue restoration of the article, you could open a deletion review discussion for others to decide. --RL0919 (talk) 15:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please turn the page to draft in case other people have more information/sources to add? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.106.124.191 (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Given the very obvious promotional interest involved, no. We don't need more press releases in draft space either. If someone can gather a list of independent reliable sources to satisfy the notability guidelines linked above, then writing a keepable article shouldn't be difficult, but until then it is best left where it is. --RL0919 (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request to undelete: Michael Brown (City Year)

Hello, I would like to request that the page "Michael Brown (City Year)" be undeleted so that I can make updates and add new information and sources. I believe it was deleted because the subject was deemed not notable, however I believe he is notable as a leader in the US national service movement and as the current president of Harvard University's Board of Overseers. I am new to editing Wikipedia so am unsure exactly how the process works -- please let me know if you need additional information or if there is another avenue I should be pursuing to reinstate the page. BusyBadger (talk) 23:34, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BusyBadger: I don't believe it would be appropriate to restore the page as a regular article, but I could restore it as a draft, either in your own user space (e.g., as User:BusyBadger/Michael Brown (City Year)) or in draft space (as Draft:Michael Brown (City Year)). Do you have a preference? --RL0919 (talk) 15:59, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@RL0919: I don't have a preference, either works for me. Thanks! BusyBadger (talk) 22:28, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@BusyBadger: OK, I have restored to User:BusyBadger/Michael Brown (City Year). --RL0919 (talk) 19:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GAN review

Hello Richard, I hope you are well. I saw your name at Talk:Peter Dinklage/GA1 and was wondering if you were willing to take a look at the Emilia Clarke GAN review? I would appreciate any help and comments. Thank you! -- LuK3 (Talk) 18:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Farmer Maggot

Hi! Sorry to message you out of the blue, but is there any chance you could tell me who redirected this page, and when? I nominated the page for deletion back in 2017, it was closed as "keep" by a non-admin despite a 3.5-2.5 split with one of the keep !votes consisting entirely of Keep per above comments. Aoba47 (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2017 (UTC), and it seems someone, perhaps me, went ahead and ignored said BADNAC and redirected the page; the redirect target was apparently deleted three years later without my knowledge, and now I'm not sure if I accidentally did a runabout on the normal AFD procedure by unilaterally redirecting an article to another article that was subsequently deleted.

If it was me, I'd say the article should be restored and a separate AFD opened purely as a matter of procedure. Even if it wasn't me, I suspect whoever it was should probably be asked what they think of the matter.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:48, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hijiri88: It looks like there was a successful proposed merge of the character article to the list in December 2019. The character article was redirected as a result of the merge. --RL0919 (talk) 13:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that clears that up. Thanks! :D Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 02:13, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FAC assist

Hello! I am hoping to renominate the MAX Red Line article for FAC this week. My previous attempt failed due to a lack of comments. Could I ask for your input in the nomination? I would greatly appreciate it. --Truflip99 (talk) 18:44, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Melanie Perkins and Draft:Alex Depledge

Hi RL0919. You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Depledge as "keep" in October 2019. Zaynha (talk · contribs) moved Alex Depledge to Draft:Alex Depledge. Zaynha did the same with moving Melanie Perkins to Draft:Melanie Perkins. I reverted the moves but have been re-reverted. See here for more information. Would you provide advice about what I can do to restore the drafts to mainspace? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Cunard: I have moved Alex Depledge back to mainspace because of the previous AfD result. I don't see any AfD for Melanie Perkins, so I have taken no action on that. --RL0919 (talk) 13:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for moving Alex Depledge back to mainspace. Cunard (talk) 10:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Augustus

Hello RL0919On 7 January 2020 you deleted Alexander Augustus, following this AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Augustus. Yet somehow it made it's way back from an accepted draft on 29 March 2020‎. Is the current version of the article similar enough to the version that was deleted to qualify for CSD per G4? Thanks, Vexations (talk) 16:30, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks reasonably different. The leads start off similarly, but after that the wording is different, the new version has about twice as much prose, and most important it has a lot more source citations (29 vs. 5). So I would say this is not a G4. --RL0919 (talk) 17:01, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

readded Callanecc

Oversight changes

readded HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ayn Rand by Talbot 1943.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ayn Rand by Talbot 1943.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation: List of reviewers by subject notice

Hi RL0919, you are receiving this notice because you are listed as an active Articles for Creation reviewer.

Recently a list of reviewers by area of expertise was created. This notice is being sent out to alert you to the existence of that list, and to encourage you to add your name to it. If you or other reviewers come across articles in the queue where an acceptance/decline hinges on specialist knowledge, this list should serve to facilitate contact with a fellow reviewer.

To end on a positive note, the backlog has dropped below 1,500, so thanks for all of the hard work some of you have been putting into the AfC process!

Sent to all Articles for Creation reviewers as a one-time notice. To opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery to your user talk page. Regards, Sam-2727 (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

Administrator changes

added CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
removed Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes

removed SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:27, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:25, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request

Hello Dear Respected Administrator Mr.RL0919

A page you deleted in Feb 2020 due to now or low news references Turki Almohsen, now i have seen 5 references in Google News so i should re create this page?

[1]

[2]

Memon KutianaWala (talk) 18:06, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "New Comedy Jameel competition supports performers in Saudi Arabia and beyond". AlKhaleej Today (in Arabic). 2020-07-02. Retrieved 2020-07-16.
  2. ^ "Community Jameel launches YouTube competition for aspiring comedians in KSA". BroadcastPro ME. 2020-07-05. Retrieved 2020-07-16.
Considering that you created the previous article that was unanimously deleted at AfD, I would suggest you submit any future attempt on this subject as a draft, at Draft:Turki Almohsen, to get review and advice from others before going to mainspace with it again. --RL0919 (talk) 23:34, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Now at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2020 July 17. —Cryptic 18:23, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).

Administrator changes

added Red Phoenix
readded Euryalus • SQL
removed Jujutacular • Monty845 • Rettetast • Madchester

Oversight changes

readded GB fan
removed Keegan • Opabinia regalis • Premeditated Chaos

Guideline and policy news

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:21, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Kaelin

Hello, I am writing to you because you were the XfD closer on the AfD. I started the article on Christopher Kaelin and then I also nominated the article for AfD. At the time I did not feel the subject was notable. Since that time I have learned to write better articles and now I have found more research to show that Kaelin is notable. So I am wondering if you can give me a draft of this article. I have been working on the article and I have improved the research and will not move it to main space until it is ready. Thanks. Lightburst (talk) 02:45, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Lightburst: I don't object to your attempt to create a draft on the subject, but I'm not clear on what your exact request is here. Do you want me to restore the deleted article to draftspace? Or to your sandbox? Something else? --RL0919 (talk) 04:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thanks for the response. Restore to draft space if you would. That way I can have others work on it with me... My best Lightburst (talk) 16:50, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see how my message was confusing. I was rewriting the Kaelin article. I wanted a draft because I think the original history should probably be preserved. Apologies for the pings Lightburst (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Lightburst: Restored and moved to Draft:Christopher Kaelin. --RL0919 (talk) 19:08, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please restore

Hi, please restore my page User:Misza13/vote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). That's a "template" for personal use only, intended to be subst'ed and does not differ from manually inserting an image and bolding a bit of text, just makes it less of a hassle. Thanks, —Миша13 14:49, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Misza13: This page was deleted as the result of a discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Misza13/vote, and it would not be appropriate for me to reverse that result without some evidence of error or a change in consensus. If you want to pursue a review of the previous discussion, you can use Wikipedia:Deletion review. Or you could simply make your position known in discussions without adding an image, which is the approach most commonly used on English Wikipedia. --RL0919 (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Both the nomination and the comments were not appropriate as this is a userspace page, not a common Wikipedia/Template page for use by the wider community. You, as the closing administrator, should have recognized that and, instead of just tallying delete votes (I hope you can appreciate the irony here), point out that the page does not actually violate any policies (specifically, WP:USERPAGE) and close as keep. In fact, no valid policy was even mentioned in the discussion.
You are referring me to WP:DR, but please note that the first step is to discuss the matter with the person who deleted the content, which is what I'm doing right now.
(excerpt from WP:DR) Consider attempting to discuss the matter with the closer as this could resolve the matter more quickly. There could have been a mistake, miscommunication, or misunderstanding, and a full review may not be needed. Such discussion also gives the closer the opportunity to clarify the reasoning behind a decision.
Can you clarify your reasoning for deletion?
BTW, it is well within any administrator's right to undelete content that was previously deleted.
Finally (and this is orthogonal to the validity of the deletion), the way I make my position known in a discussion, bold text or not, with image or not, is entirely up to my discretion and not actually dictated by policy. But feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. —Миша13 21:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The nomination was made at the appropriate venue for deleting user pages, and the longstanding consensus against this approach to marking "votes" is not based on what namespace is used for the tool facilitating it. There is no formal policy on the matter, and consensus can change, but I didn't see any sign of it having changed in 2018, nor am I aware of such a change now. --RL0919 (talk) 22:05, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).

Administrator changes

added Eddie891
removed Angela • Jcw69 • Just Chilling • Philg88 • Viajero

CheckUser changes

readded SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:56, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dasha Nekrasova

Hi you saved this page previously from being trolled with bad faith nominations, see the history of nominations for deletion for both this page and Red Scare (podcast). I think a previously blocked user has tried submitting it for deletion again under a different name but they've messed up the formatting, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dasha Nekrasova (3rd nomination). Can we get a speedy keep on this one too, or at least get the formatting fixed so more people can vote on it? I can't figure out what they've done. Thank you!Pinchofhope (talk) 07:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like another editor fixed the nomination formatting. Since a third AFD nomination after two keeps is unusual but not at all unheard of, and it has been more than six months since the previous nomination, I would say to let the process run its course. --RL0919 (talk) 22:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap fillers - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Administrators' newsletter – September 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).

Administrator changes

added Ajpolino • LuK3
readded Jackmcbarn
removed Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
renamed There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interested in helping with Robert Rubin?

Hi Richard, my name is Bill and I'm a longtime Wikipedian (since '06) and one who takes on COI guideline-compliant client work, meaning in such circumstances I will propose changes to pages, but never edit articles directly. Recently I started working with former U.S. Treasury Sec. Robert Rubin, and have posted a couple of requests on his biographical talk page and tried to find some editors interested to review the changes, without much luck. And yet, I think it is an oversight on Wikipedia's part that the Rubin biography does not mention, among other important events, his role in passing the 1993 Deficit Reduction Act.

I did some research and found that you are among the most active contributors to the Alan Greenspan article, and considering their close association in the 90s, I thought you might have some expertise and interest in the topic. If you are at all interested, have a look at my request on the Rubin talk page about the 1993 Deficit Reduction Act (here). If you are not, however, that's entirely fine, I just hope you'll let me know if that's the case. Cheers, WWB Too (Talk · COI) 12:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

  • Overall winner
    • 1st - $500
    • 2nd - $200
    • 3rd - $100
  • Diversity winner - $100
  • Gender-gap filler - $100
  • Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020

Interface administrator changes

added Izno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Hover title

Template:Hover title has been nominated for merging with Template:Tooltip. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼  00:21, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prinzzess

Would you consider restoring this article? I created it but I was never notified that it was up for deletion, and I believe I can improve it. (SN: The nominator, whom I don't recall ever having any interaction with, was indeffed as a sockpuppet less than a month later.) Erpert blah, blah, blah... 21:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Erpert: Considering that it has been deleted twice at AfD, a restoration directly to mainspace does not seem justifiable. However, I could revive it to a draft if you would like to work on it for possible restoration as an article once it is suitable. --RL0919 (talk) 22:05, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't see the original version of the article from 2008, but judging from that AfD, it appears that it was deleted for different reasoning than from the second AfD. But yes, I would appreciate it if you restored it as a draft. Erpert blah, blah, blah... 22:10, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Erpert: Restored to Draft:Prinzzess. --RL0919 (talk) 22:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:10, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Leupp page

Hi RL0919. You deleted and protected Aaron Leupp. Since then another article has appeared at Aaron J. Leupp. The content appears to be different, superficially at least, so I hesitate to add {{db-repost}}. I'd like to get your thoughts. Thanks. Tassedethe (talk) 01:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Tassedethe: Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Comparing the new and previous versions, and in particular seeing that there are different sources used, I would also shy away from treating this as a WP:CSD#G4 repost. It does seem ripe for another AFD, however, and create-protection of the new title if it is deleted. --RL0919 (talk) 05:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).

Administrator changes

added TJMSmith
removed Boing! said Zebedee • Hiberniantears • Lear's Fool • Only • WGFinley

Interface administrator changes

added AmandaNP

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
  • When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
  • There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum Psychology

You reverted the changes since the article had previously been deleted but does that mean it can be created as its own separate page now? Otherwise what exactly was wrong with the content for the recent edit I had done? BlacklilyofKoN (talk) 04:38, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you are referring to an edit by User:Onel5969 to the page Quantum psychology. I have never edited the page Quantum Psychology, nor have I edited Quantum psychology except to delete it per the consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum psychology and recreate it as a redirect to Quantum Psychology. I cannot speak to the thinking of User:Onel5969 – you should ask them. --RL0919 (talk) 05:44, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2021).

Administrator changes

removed Alexandria • Happyme22 • RexxS

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a has been deprecated; it covered immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
  • Following a request for comment, page movers were granted the delete-redirect userright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target.

Technical news

  • When you move a page that many editors have on their watchlist the history can be split and it might also not be possible to move it again for a while. This is because of a job queue problem. (T278350)
  • Code to support some very old web browsers is being removed. This could cause issues in those browsers. (T277803)

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the assistance

Just wanted to say thank you so much for fixing incoming links for He Who Gets Slapped related articles. I appreciate you.4meter4 (talk) 20:27, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RL0919&oldid=1017069682"