User talk:130.156.142.240: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:04, 19 April 2022

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- GraemeL ^(talk) 18:31, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Herpes simplex virus. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. NewEnglandYankee 20:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

10 July 2007

Please do not delete content from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vernon Johns. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use Wikipedia:Sandbox for test edits. Thank you. ~ Riana ⁂ 14:13, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edits to L. Ron Hubbard:

Your recent edit to L. Ron Hubbard (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a non-talk page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 14:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Halo (megastructure), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Halo (megastructure) was changed by 130.156.142.240 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-13T17:35:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot 17:35, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Granville Woods. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. Olana North (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plato

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Yannismarou (talk) 17:13, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Slayer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Pool has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to The Pool constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content. Thank you. NuclearWarfare ^{contact me}_{My work} 21:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:03, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Friedrich Nietzsche has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. --Unpopular Opinion (talk · contribs) 17:05, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Financial crisis has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:30, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Your recent edit to Crispus Attucks (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 13:16, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lonnie Johnson. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lonnie Johnson was changed by 130.156.142.240 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2009-08-04T15:35:59+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Lonnie Johnson (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or shut uplink spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Walt Disney, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GorillaWarfare ^talk 17:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 1985 Mexico City earthquake has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 18:09, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking in Types of Restaurants /1/

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Types of Restaurants. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ► Wireless Keyboard ◄. 23:29, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Renewable energy worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Igoldste (talk) 16:26, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! joe•roe^t•c 20:16, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Fujifilm has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Fossil fuel, you may be blocked from editing. Leonxlin (talk) 16:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fossil fuel, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Feinoha ^{Talk, My master} 16:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Robeson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thales, you may be blocked from editing. Alcmaeonid (talk) 20:56, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Barack Obama. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dave Dial (talk) 14:26, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2013

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to The Color of Water, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Widr (talk) 16:28, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shirley Jackson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Deor (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Scientific Method

Hello 130.156.142.240. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Scientific Method.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Scientific Method}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from The Potato Eaters, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:43, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]