Jump to content

User talk:Theparties: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 264: Line 264:
# In accordance with [[Special:Permalink/1197325461#RfC: applying signature validation retroactively|a recent request for comment]], all invalid signatures will be changed to [[MediaWiki:Signature|the default]], which looks like "[[User:Example|Example]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Example|talk]])", one month from now.</div> If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Signatures]]. Thank you! [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
# In accordance with [[Special:Permalink/1197325461#RfC: applying signature validation retroactively|a recent request for comment]], all invalid signatures will be changed to [[MediaWiki:Signature|the default]], which looks like "[[User:Example|Example]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Example|talk]])", one month from now.</div> If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at [[Wikipedia talk:Signatures]]. Thank you! [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HouseBlaster/invalid_signatures&oldid=1201518366 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:HouseBlaster/invalid_signatures&oldid=1201518366 -->


<!---{{unblock|reason=
I would like to have the [[User:23prootie]] account to be unbanned and this account to be unblocked. I have learned my lesson and I agree with the sanctions against me. I promise not to use any sockpuppets anymore and I promise to use this account as my primary account. I forgot the password from the [[User:23prootie]] account and I do not have access to the email. I would like to start fresh and use this account for useful edits. I promise not to start and edit war or to move pages without consensus, reasons why I was banned in the first place. I have refrained from editing in the last few months and I do not know if enough time have passed for my sanctions to be lifted. I apologize to the community for the disruption I have caused and I promise not to do it again.

{{non-admin comment}} '''Neutral''' but given their long history of socking and disruptive edits, I would only support an unban under the condition that (1) '''they stick to one and only one account period''', and (2) '''they remain on final warning status for any and all disruption on any and all pages, broadly construed'''. Any violations of these terms would be a grounds for a reblock for any time period or indefinitely. Both of these restrictions would be appealable after 24 months, which resets for violation of the first condition. The most recent SPI was filed by [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/23prootie/Archive#29_December_2022|the OP on SPI]] as an admission of sockpuppetry. If there was actual trolling going on I would just stick with [[WP:RBI]]. Their last confirmed sock before this one is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/23prootie/Archive#25_March_2014|back in 2014]] unless if there were additional socks not recorded on SPI. [[WP:ROPE]] is probably applicable here. User:Awesome Aasim - User_talk:Awesome Aasim ❄️ 18:21, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
~~~~}}--->

Revision as of 07:01, 13 February 2024

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

Teahouse logo

Hi Theparties! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Thank you.


DYK for The Magical Delights of Stevie Nicks

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Banaue Philippines Handmade-brooms-01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:48, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Banaue Philippines Ifugao-Tribesman-01.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:49, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Love it. fabulous.--11:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Sasheer Zamata

Thanks from the DYK project and I Victuallers (talk) 00:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Banaue Philippines Batad-Rice-Terraces-02.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:02, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Imelda (film)

Orlady (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for nominating the episode article for DYK! Since it was approved, it became the second most viewed DYK article in January 2014 and was ranked 731 on WPTV's popular pages, which, you'll notice does not include many (if any) episode articles! Thanks again! — Wyliepedia 18:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Juglans regia 2009 G2.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 06:55, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fernanda Lima

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Kampala Kasubi Tombs.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:09, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Orlando Quevedo

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dom Justo Takayama

Nice work on the article. FYI, per the rules, an article may only be featured once per year (there are a few exceptions for holidays and observances), so I removed the article from February 4, leaving it on February 3. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 19:09, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Drill instructor at the Officer Candidate School.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:47, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for inappropriately marking edits as minor. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
When this current block expires, be aware that you are very likely to be blocked for edit warring if you continue your activities at Philippines. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 12:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am going to address why I mark all my edits as minor. There is a tendency I have to get into fights with other people and I just don't want that. Marking them minor makes me avoid these. It's not to be rude, no offence.--Theparties (talk) 8 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, marking all of your edits "minor" does mean fewer people will see them. This is exactly why marking all of your edits as "minor" is not acceptable. - SummerPhD (talk) 19:20, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sorry, I did not thought it was a big deal because I had been doing it for four months and no one complained until now. Fine, I am not going to do it again.-- 00:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
No one complained?[1][2][3] - SummerPhD (talk) 00:48, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oh! I forgot about that one in December. Fine. I'm stopping. You win.-- 00:51, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)

The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Imelda (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your new signature

Can you please change your signature so that it contains your username? A heart symbol doesn't really help people in identifying who you are. Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 01:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The new signature works. Thanks, Sᴠᴇɴ Mᴀɴɢᴜᴀʀᴅ Wha? 17:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome.--(Theparties) 23:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Imelda (film)

The article Imelda (film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Imelda (film) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of The Rambling Man -- The Rambling Man (talk) 13:31, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for inappropriately marking edits as minor even after a recent block, as you did at Juliette Barnes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 23:21, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theparties (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Sorry. It's been a habit so it's quite difficult to undo marking my edits. I check the minor edit to make sure I am logged in (and yeah to avoid conflict). Could you warn me first next time before blocking me? Sorry again. And yeah I agree to stop marking my edits minor. (Theparties) 00:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You received plenty of warning above, leading to your previous block on the same issue. I doubt that you mean it this time regarding marking these edits as minor. SQLQuery me! 04:20, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Gabriel Yuji (talk), I honestly don't know how to upload an image without any copyright issues. I may be able to fill the rest of the infobox once my block expires. In the meantime, could you find anyone who can do it?--(Theparties) 15:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can upload it. I found this and this image. Do you have any preference or another image? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The second one. I went to an error page for the first one.--(Theparties) 22:13, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Does this link work? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 04:44, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:1801 Cary Map of the East Indies and Southeast Asia ( Singapore, Borneo, Sumatra, Java, Philippines) - Geographicus - EastIndies-cary-1801.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 04:31, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Pinctada margaritifera MHNT.CON.2002.893.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 14:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Saddle Ridge Hoard

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your Featured picture candidate has been promoted
Your nomination for featured picture status, File:Treatyofwaitangi.jpg, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Armbrust The Homunculus 10:44, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Imelda Marcos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- Jonesey95 (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Imelda Marcos

The article Imelda Marcos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Imelda Marcos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonesey95 -- Jonesey95 (talk) 01:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

{Unblock|1=(I am putting this unblock on hold as I figure out what to do next.)

Seven months have passed since this block/ban was implemented. The list that justified this "ban" has been deleted because the pro-deletion side commented that it is based on "outdated" information. The user who imposed this block has been inactive for over a month. That user has also created a page about me that may violate Wikipedia's policies about privacy and personal information and that page should be deleted. There have been many times when I have filed appeals to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee but I was always denied and I have grown to be disillusioned by that process. I would like to invoke the "second chance" policy and I would like to cut my ties to my old account and start over fresh and new.}}

This is a checkuser block and requires either the Arbitration Commitee (through the Ban Appeals Sub Committee) or a checkuser to authorise your unblock. Editors and administrators, other than checkusers, are unable to assist you in this request. You may wish to use the WP:UTRS system to more quickly make a checkuser aware of your request, however.
Also, when filing an unblock request, do NOT keep editing it and causing edit conflicts. Nick (talk) 12:53, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, thanks. I am going to try your suggestion. And sorry for creep-editing. I was trying to cram all the info.-(Theparties) 12:58, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since you claim this unblock request is "on hold", I've disabled it. However, were I to respond to it, I'd be sure to point out that the request doesn't address either the reason for your original blocks nor the abuse of multiple accounts, but instead depends on irrelevencies such as that the person who blocked you hasn't been active in the last couple months and created a quite appropriate long term abuse page about you. You'll need to get the arbitration committee to lift this block and give you another chance; I assure you, with your history, an unblock request on this page, especially as poor as this one, will not be fulfilled. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

2014 Year In Review Awards

The WikiProject Barnstar
For your outstanding contributions for Featured Pictures in 2014 you are hereby award this WikiProject Barnstar. Congratulations! For the Military history Wikiproject Coordinators, TomStar81 (Talk) 08:38, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Filipino communism" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Filipino communism. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 11#Filipino communism until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pandakekok9 (talk) 03:34, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
  3. Update your signature to fix the error.
  4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

  1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]