Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 20:28 on 10 September 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• Neurocpedia (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1011 (LTA 1011, details). Note: Some true positives from this filter will look "innocent". Please see the comment at the top of Special:AbuseFilter/1011. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:30, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

  Not sure what to think here. New account welcoming even newer accounts? Could be a sockmaster trying to legitimize sleeper accounts, but that's not enough to go on for that. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

  This is clearly someone who has been here before. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:50, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

  Well, until we know more, I don't see enough to take action. Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• 218.186.12.218 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - . User publicly outed my real-life identity. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses. HBC AIV helperbot3 (talk) 00:44, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

It's not really an "outing" if it was on your userpage for several years. Tan | 39 02:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

At the very least, the IP was being incivil and hostile to an editor here, and acted in complete and utter malfeasance in his editing of pages. This IP also said some pretty defamatory things about me. Not saying that I am going to, but in Singapore (where the IP originates), a person could be sued for doing what this IP has done. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

• 218.186.12.206 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - actions evidently indicate a vandalism only account. Vandalized after the first blocking immediately. Thank you.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 02:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)