Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 20:49 on 8 November 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

User-reported

• Tao2911 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) vandalism on Adi Da article after final warning.Devanagari108 (talk) 20:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Cirt (talk) 21:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I investigated this report concomittantly with Cirt and agree that this is not overt vandalism. Please consider dispute resolution. Lazulilasher (talk) 21:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

• Meechim (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On Israeli wine; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Exactly one month ago this single-purpose user account was incarnated as User:Wachay, made a bunch of POV edits [1][2][3] and after warnings, appears to have reincarnated as User:Martina66 with much the same MO[4][5][6] Then, after a explanatory notice[7] adopted a series of more subtle approaches[8][9][10] which were reverted with incremental levels of warnings. Yesterday a new username with the same tactics[11][12] leads me to conclude these disruptive edits are from clear sock accounts and will just go on ad nauseum unless we block the IP.. mikaul^talk 20:30, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

This noticeboard is for obvious vandals and spammers only. Consider taking this report to Sockpuppet investigations. If only to clean out the sock drawer. TNXMan 20:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

I believe a person who has now been blocked for vandalism is using a login with my name and first initial, pretending to be me. She has been blocked, but can she post on other pages under that name or is that account permanently deleted?

Thank you! Nadine Weissmann (talk) 21:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Finding Nemo vandalism

Austinp12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - On Finding Nemo; actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Just see the history of the article for yourself, in fact, there seems to be plenty of drive-by vandals on this page, should it be protected? CDrive655 (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)