User talk:Neutrality

Picture of the day

Village weaver

Photograph credit: Charles J. Sharp

• Archive
• More featured pictures

Privileges

As a consequence of this motion, I will be making the appropriate arrangements shortly. Thank you very much for all your help in the help.  Roger Davies ^talk 10:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

National Association of State Treasurers Redirect Page

The redirect page you created at National Association of State Treasurers should not be a redirect page because it is a separate organization. See Talk:National Association of State Treasurers for further details including source information. --TommyBoy (talk) 20:16, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XXXIX (May 2009)

The May 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:32, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

an almanac?

A rather pedantic discussion is taking place at Wikipedia talk:What Wikipedia is not#Conflicting/confusing_guidelines about whether WP:NOT can say Wikipedia is not an almanac. Such a claim would contradict Wikipedia:Five pillars, which you initiated. It may be too long ago to recall, but when you first wrote the page, which sources or official policies did you use to write "general encylopedias, specialized encylopedias, and almanacs?" What was the basis of the wording? In the end, it doesn't really matter, but the Conflicting/confusing_guidelines discussion is interesting nonetheless. Kingturtle (talk) 03:31, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

File:Save Freedom of Speech.png

Hi, I just listed File:Save Freedom of Speech.png that you uploaded (in 2004, wow!) at WP:PUI because someone changed the tagging to claim the image is in the public domain; I hope you'll join the discussion. Unfortunately, in order to not be deleted as a result of that if the result is "non-free", it will need a fair use rationale written for the articles it is used in; I'd do it myself but I'm not really familiar enough with the image to know what specifically the rationale is. Anomie⚔ 20:25, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

The result of the WP:PUF (aka PUI) discussion was to re-label the image as non-free, however as a non-free image it require a non-free use rationale for each article it's used it, currently it's lacking this (indeed never seems to have had one) and may get deleted or removed from some articles unless such rationales are addded, see Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline. --Sherool (talk) 15:58, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Aragonese Party logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Aragonese Party logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Follow Up

Following up on our earlier discussion, I have changed National Association of State Treasurers from a redirect page to a separate article. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

could i get you opinion

Just wondering if I could get you opinion on something Talk:Manchester mayoral election, 2009 (New Hampshire) is where the discussion is. So there is an disagreement between me and another editor on what the page should be I believe it should be the one posted above and he thinks it should be Manchester, New Hampshire mayoral election, 2009 just wondering if you could contribute thanks Gang14 (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XL (June 2009)

The June 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

National Association of State Treasurers Follow Up

As a result of our previous discussion, I have previously created a separate article at National Association of State Treasurers. By the way, I apologize for the delay in informing you as I have been very busy working on other articles. --TommyBoy (talk) 11:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Court of Common Pleas

Nice work on this disambiguation page and its related articles. This was a much-needed change. --Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 00:15, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I just read over New York Court of Common Pleas. I'm impressed, you've really done your homework! I submitted it to WP:DYK; I hope you don't mind. --Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 00:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLI (July 2009)

The July 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:34, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

DYK for New York Court of Common Pleas

On August 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New York Court of Common Pleas, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

WP:DYK 08:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

wt:5p

Hi Neutrality

I've proposed some changes to the five pillars. The most controversial proposals are to the first sentence of the first pillar, and the first sentence of the fifth pillar. Since this text has changed very little since you created the page in 2005, I created a research section to attempt to document why this was so. Your contributions (either to the research section, or to the general discussion) would be greatly appreciated! Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 02:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

European University

Hi Neutrality,

I contact you because I need your help in an article European University I represent the organization and I'm disagree about the last modify. In my opinion the article lost their neutral point of view and now other user add text related only about unaccredited status, I my opinion this is not relevant, I read other University in Wikipedia and none of them have emphasis in the unaccredited status in my opinion last modify generated a bad images and don't keep a neutral tone. But well this is my opinion, for that I will contact you because your nick look neutral. Please if you could check and review the discussion page of this article and the article and give me your feedback I will be thankfully for your contribution. --Omrganews (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Star-Spangled Banner artists rendering.bmp

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Star-Spangled Banner artists rendering.bmp. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Mother Joseph

Template:Image Hi, I wrote for the german Wikipedia [1] an article about Mother Joseph. I would like to put the picture in the german article, but for that, it needs to be transferred to Commons. Is it posiible for you to arrange that? I would be very thankfull.--Milziade (talk) 15:27, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

 Done Check out her category. Paradoctor (talk) 23:44, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September!
Many thanks,  Roger Davies ^talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLII (August 2009)

The August 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!

Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September!
For the coordinators,  Roger Davies ^talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

United States armed forces

Your move was a bit too WP:BOLD. There is an ongoing discussion at Talk:United States armed forces#Move?, and you are welcome to take part in the discussion to help determine the most appropriate title for the article to end up being moved to. Thank you! Wilhelm Meis (Quatsch!) 04:00, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

Disitnct population segment

Noticed you changed page name to conform with cap standards, but you dropped "(DPS)". I thought this was useful, and wondered what your reason was.Busaccsb (talk) 20:23, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

MILHIST admins

Hi. Since you're an admin and a member of the Military History WikiProject, feel free to list yourself here. Cheers, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIII (September 2009)

The September 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:22, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Featured Picture

your upload of NASA's image of Australia

Hi Neutrality, a picture of Australia you uploaded all the way back in 2004 has been identified as a Featured Picture. As the nominator I should have told you earlier, but I'd like to thank you anyway. Good work! Cheers, Mostlyharmless (talk) 02:51, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Happy Neutrality's Day!

User:Neutrality has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Neutrality's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Neutrality! Peace, Rlevse 00:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC) A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:31, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Senate regulations

Please note that Wikipedia is not for original text of documents. Please write articles about such regulations, not just copy the rules. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:17, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

These articles will become the framework for context and explanation of the rules. See Standing Rules of the United States Senate, Rule I, Rule II, etc. Neutrality^talk 21:19, 30 October 2009 (UTC) copied from User talk:DJ Clayworth

That's OK if you are going to expand them. However you should still not be copying the entire regulation to the article. Note other examples such as Constitution of the Unisted States of America which does not do this. Please move towards these articles being about the regulations. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:21, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Test your World War I knowledge with the Henry Allingham International Contest!

As a member of the Military history WikiProject or World War I task force, you may be interested in competing in the Henry Allingham International Contest! The contest aims to improve article quality and member participation within the World War I task force. It will also be a step in preparing for Operation Great War Centennial, the project's commemorative effort for the World War I centenary.

If you would like to participate, please sign up by 11 November 2009, 00:00, when the first round is scheduled to begin! You can sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIV (October 2009)

The October 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:57, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

"Adjournment in contemplation of dismissal"

What is going on with the moves here? Bearian (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Duh on my part, LOL! Bearian (talk) 22:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

F----- listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect F-----. Since you had some involvement with the F----- redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Josh Parris 02:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC) Josh Parris 02:58, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Qian Xuesen

With this edit you removed from the biography of Qian Xuesen Category:United States Army personnel, indicating in your comment, "consultant, not Army solider." He held the rank of Colonel and as can be seen in one of the photos in the article, he wore the uniform of the U.S. Army. How then was he not "Army personnel"? (sdsds - talk) 07:51, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Move problem

Good day Neutrality! I think this is the first time we've spoken. Unfortunately I take issue with the move you performed to History of Confederate States Army Generals, pointing it to General officers in the Confederate States Army. Here are my beefs with this:

1. I intended it to mirror the naming of an existing article covering like material: History of United States generals.
2. This move wreaks many, many piped links dealing with ranks within the Confederate Army, such as Maj. Gen. (CSA), Lieutenant General (CSA), Full General (CSA), Brig. Gen. (CSA), Militia General (CSA), and lots of others that section-piped into the relevant parts of the article. Most of the Confederate general bios use these, easily seen if you click on any of the links here.
3. The numerous redirects this move causes, taking a look at this page for instance, given how many articles contained links to the prior name.
4. My own personal hatred of redirects!

OK those last two are more my problem, but I would appreciate you views on this anyway. Good Day! Kresock (talk) 02:30, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Constituencies of Caprivi

Template:Constituencies of Caprivi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Pgallert (talk) 14:52, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XIV (November 2009)

The November 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Season's greetings

Thank you for being one of the people who has made 2009 such an interesting and enlightening year for me. It has certainly had its challenges, but also many highlights. I wish you peace and contentment in 2010, and a joyous holiday season to you and yours. In honour of the season, I hope you will enjoy a little musical token. Your choice: traditional or cheeky. Best, Risker (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year

Best Wishes for 2010, FloNight♥♥♥♥ 13:30, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVI (December 2009)

The December 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:04, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Better source request for File:John Kerry real deal.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:John Kerry real deal.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 01:19, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:Juan Manuel Rodriguez (writer)#Requested move

Hi, Neutrality. Since you are one of the translators listed at Wikipedia:Translators available#Spanish-to-English, could you help us at Talk:Juan Manuel Rodriguez (writer)#Requested move? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 19:28, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

Article Incubator Invitation for Bocconi School of Law Student-Edited Papers

Hi. I have put an article on Bocconi School of Law Student-Edited Papers in the article incubator, here: Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Bocconi School of Law Student-Edited Papers. Considering your previous experience editing articles on law journals, feel free to cooperate if you have any practical ideas to help establish notability. Incidentally, let me anticipate that the journal is actually the first student-edited legal working paper series, which has been created in Europe better to adapt to the editorial panorama of the Old Continent, where student-edited law reviews are not nearly as popular as they are in the US. I have already provided references (e.g. an article appeared on the German Law Journal) for these claims. Thanks for any help you may provide me with, --Grasshopper6 (talk) 10:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

US National Park Rangers

Hi Neutrality, I've been looking over the Ranger pages recently, and I've noticed that way back in 2008 you moved US National Park Rangers to National Park Ranger. I was wondering if there'd been any discussion about it and if you could point me in the right direction. I'm a little concerned that the article may now need a worldview tag, because its describing a worldwide profession in the title, but limited to US in the article (ironically the article was created to avoid just such a tag at Park Ranger!). I have no prob with a US specific article, but there are NP Rangers all around the world (a profession that isn't covered specifically in Park Ranger either) so I'd have thought country specifying the title would be more sensible. Any thoughts? Ranger Steve (talk) 14:49, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Neutrality! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 874 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Rick Findley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:JudgeBio

Template:JudgeBio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:07, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Islip, New York to Islip

I have opened a discussion on this topic at Talk:Islip#Proposed merge from Islip, New York and am notifying editors who appear to be interested in these articles. You are invited to join the discussion. Many thanks, --MegaSloth (talk) 21:48, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVII (January 2010)

The January 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 04:20, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Bullet-resistant glass, name change.

Per WP:COMMONNAME, articles should use the most commonly used name, which may not be the official one. As such, I don't think your recent bold move to "bullet-resistant glass" is acceptable.

"Common usage in reliable sources is preferred to technically correct but rarer forms, whether the official name, the scientific name..."

Please reply on the article talk page. (Hohum ^@) 14:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!

The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of William Rivers Pitt

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is William Rivers Pitt. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Rivers Pitt (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Stuart Pimm page deleted

Hi there,

I note that you deleted the page Stuart Pimm on September 24, 2007. I'd like to write an article about this eminent and respectable scientist who is Doris Duke Chair of Conservation Ecology at Duke University. Please can you help me understand why the original article was deleted?

Thank you. Allthingstoallpeople (talk) 05:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLVIII (February 2010)

The February 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Terri Schiavo case

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of edits to this page. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Terri Schiavo case/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Governors of Alaska

You've split this article in two and created two gimped articles.

The article on an office should contain information about its powers, how you become it, the qualifications, etc. An article on the people who have served it should include an introduction on it, establishing what it is; how the list changes from governor to governor (i.e. when elections are, how succession works); and finally, the list.

You have turned one article into including only the succession information and a random paragraph about how Alaska became a state, and one article into having only a list. You have turned one complete articles into two articles which, together, are less than half complete.

I will be undoing this move/split. An example to look at when attempting this in the future is the difference between Governor of California and List of Governors of California; the list contains the people who were governor and the mechanisms by which entries to that list are added or changed, and the article on the office contains all of the information about the office itself. And not a random paragraph about the origin of the state. --Golbez (talk) 00:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Yes, an article on the office needs all of the stuff that's in the list article - and more. It lacked that. Therefore, you removed the stuff that was relevant to the list article, and added nothing additional that is required of an article on the office. As for the nature of unilateral edits, I think I am quite aware as to how Wikipedia works. The edits needed to be reversed because you turned a featured list, recognized by the greater community as one of Wikipedia's best works, into two less-than-whole articles that would never have passed GA, let alone be featured. I have no problem with being bold, however splitting a featured list without ever having engaged yourself with the article in the past seems, to me, reckless. I think the split could be vastly performed better, but I do not at present have the content necessary to execute that. Therefore, reverting was the only reasonable option. And in any case, a split needs to maintain the succession information on the list article. --Golbez (talk) 03:18, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Good job on starting the splits, Neutrality. A list article should contain primarily a list, not several paragraphs of material better covered elsewhere. It's sad to see a good move reverted wholesale, but I've encountered similar problems myself on these governors articles. I no longer deal with tenditious editors, so I'll also be moving on too. - BilCat (talk) 06:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

I will drop the stick. Just please, in the future, seek consensus before destroying a featured list. Thank you. --Golbez (talk) 18:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!

Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:09, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Your deletion....

Inre your deletion... Would you care to either close the AFD or return the article until the AFD is actually closed? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:02, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

AfD for Neyaz Ahmad

Hello, Neutrality ... FYI, you neglected to Close Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neyaz Ahmad, although you deleted Neyaz Ahmad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and pointed to the AfD as the reason ... Happy Editing! — 71.166.147.78 (talk · contribs) _{17:28, 6 April 2010 (UTC)}

• I've closed it for you, though the AfD was less than three days old and if the article was speedily deleted this should have been stated in the deletion summary.  Glenfarclas  (talk) 02:18, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : XLIX (March 2010)

The March 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:19, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Opinion needed!

As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the conservative support for President Obama in Talk:Public image of Barack Obama. Thanks.--Jerzeykydd (talk) 23:09, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Spessard Holland 2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Spessard Holland 2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:StarSpangledBanner2.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:StarSpangledBanner2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Lansdowne portrait table leg.png

Thank you for uploading File:Lansdowne portrait table leg.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Kerry with crew2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kerry with crew2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Monobook. js

hey, I saw you write scripts? so I assume you are also good with monobook (whatever its called). I kinda new here, and because I use an VERY old version of Netscape, I cannot view my preferences. I've already tried everything they told me at the help page, but it doesn't work. What I'm asking you to help me with is to help me create a signature without needing to put it into preferences (not "create" the signature for me, but allow me to sign with ~ and have it come up). Thanks so much! Purlot (talk) 07:19, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)

The April 2010 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

Legal principles

I see that you moved the category "legal principles." The philosophy department has been organizing things so as to distinguish theories and concepts. Currently there is a category "theories of law" which is consistent with all the rest of the theories category tree. However there is no "legal concepts" category. That role had been fulfilled by "legal principles." So I think you have created a redundant category much of which (but not all) can be merged into "theories of law." Be well, Greg Bard 23:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) crest.gif

Thank you for uploading File:USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) crest.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:56, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

TS bombing

Hi. I get that you are trying to shorten an over-long header, but I don't think that edit is an improvement, and would encourage you to consider reverting it. First, it is less informative, as it drops "U.S." -- the reader doesn't know the country, from the header. Second, the word is less understood than citizenship. Third, it is more syllables. Make sense?--Epeefleche (talk) 02:26, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

name change

Neutrality, I am confused as to why you renamed the APRN page back to advanced practice nurse and CRNA page back to the nurse anesthetist name. I changed the name so that would reflect the actual official names of both the profession and the specialty. If both advanced practice nurse and nurse anesthetist going to be redirected to the appropriate pages then I am not sure of your motivation. Can you please explain your logic. I reviewed the MOS guidelines and don't see how they justify your changing them back. (Fiftytoone (talk) 01:17, 19 May 2010 (UTC))