Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m 1 user left. rm 121.247.4.46 (blocked 3 days by Yunshui (AO)).
Reporting 92.13.79.201. (TW)
Line 33: Line 33:
::::::::[[User:DBigXray]] replied on your talk page. '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]]) <small>[[Template:talkback|talkback]] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 11:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
::::::::[[User:DBigXray]] replied on your talk page. '''[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]''' ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]]) <small>[[Template:talkback|talkback]] (etc) template appreciated.</small> 11:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:::::::::{{nao}} - This user is making constant unhelpful edits without actually discussing anything with ''several'' other involved editors and he has been reverted several times by multiple editors. <p>I wholly support {{User0|DBigXray}} on this. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="verdana" color="#0000FF">Mrt3366</font>]] [[User talk:Mrt3366|<font face="century gothic" size="1" color="#0000A0"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] 11:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
:::::::::{{nao}} - This user is making constant unhelpful edits without actually discussing anything with ''several'' other involved editors and he has been reverted several times by multiple editors. <p>I wholly support {{User0|DBigXray}} on this. [[User:Mrt3366|<font face="verdana" color="#0000FF">Mrt3366</font>]] [[User talk:Mrt3366|<font face="century gothic" size="1" color="#0000A0"><sup>(Talk?)</sup></font>]] 11:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
*{{IPvandal|92.13.79.201}} &ndash; vandalism after final warning. The IP keeps blanking his talk page to reset the warning counter. ''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .3em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|D<font color="#DA500B">Big</font>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<font color="#10AD00">ray</font>]]</span>'' 11:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:53, 2 August 2012

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 18:02 on 18 July 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    Continuously removes sourced info in Kashmir conflict calling other users as Indian POV taggers etc... TheStrikeΣagle 10:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    As admins will notice the above users are tag teaming and pushing pov onto the article by using terms like "pok" and using biased indian sources its obvious that there edits will be removed eventually but they need to learn neutrality strike eagle is in contact via email with Dbigxray etc as they tag team to push pov Opinedsenior (talk) 10:40, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Also its funny how strike eagle brings himself along while hes "away" to fight in behalf of pov content Opinedsenior (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) This is not the place for this. Consider WP:ANI or WP:SPI (if you have evidence). I would also suggest that you discuss this on the article's talk page. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 10:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    At WP:ANI admins say to take it to AP:AIV at AIV nao's say to take it to ANI --DBigXray 10:58, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    This is content dispute brought about by certain pov pushers and users which facilitate their behaviour by giving them the thumbs up for editing in such a manner when Dbigxray knew exactly pok is a pov term used only by Indians he ignored it while trying to remove sourced information from BBC etc Opinedsenior (talk) 11:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    User:DBigXray replied on your talk page. Callanecc (talkcontribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 11:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) - This user is making constant unhelpful edits without actually discussing anything with several other involved editors and he has been reverted several times by multiple editors.

    I wholly support DBigXray (talk) on this. Mrt3366 (Talk?) 11:34, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]