Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

• G13. Abandoned Articles for creation submissions – see Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/G13 for instructions.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

UNTOUCHABLE: CHILDREN OF GOD

• UNTOUCHABLE: CHILDREN OF GOD · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am a regular writer and I do not associated with any person/crew of this Movie. The articles is written from the view of Director. I can still rewrite the article. -Ebenezergangmei (talk) 11:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

• Are you willing to have this back as a userspace draft or normal draft? I am not keen to have this as an article in its state prior to deletion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:56, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Stale

. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:45, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Tamburawa

• Tamburawa · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

most parts of its content was in an article called 'GADAR TAMBURAWA' so had to cut it and paste it into the appropriate page but then unfortunately it was deleted by you. Please do us a favor by restoring the article please. Thanks Alot -Hamza vip (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G12, which indicates a page copied and pasted wholesale from another source, or otherwise closely paraphrased from same. G12 deletions will not be overturned here or anywhere else. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 18:47, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) It looks like it was deleted as a copyvio of [1], which is a Wikipedia mirror of Gadar Tamburawa river - the article the text was moved from. I don't know whether there should be a separate article for the content that was moved, but it's not actually a copyvio. --bonadea contributions talk 18:51, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Ryan Lollis

• Ryan Lollis · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Was just deleted in April but is now notable since he received his first Major League Baseball callup. -Yankees10 18:05, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Lollis, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. - McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 18:10, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Why was there no problem then when this was requested just a few days ago:[2] The Only difference here is that the article has not been re-created yet.--Yankees10 18:34, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

And now the article was re-created. Requesting a history restore like what was done with Jake Brigham.--Yankees10 18:50, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

I'm requesting a G4 deletion, so there's probably no need to history restore. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:56, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

But it shouldn't be deleted now as the player is clearly notable since he has received a major league callup.--Yankees10 19:03, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

For most sports the person actually has to play in a real game with the team to show that they should have an article here though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:38, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

c:File:PREDATORY HEADLIGHTS COVER VER 1.jpg

I created this image entirely myself and it violates no copyrights. -Bleakinfinity (talk) 22:18, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

• Bleakinfinity, this was deleted at Wikimedia Commons by INeverCry, so it cannot be restored here. I've tagged INeverCry in this so they can see your request, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Bleakinfinity: You had the above file and 3 other LP/album cover uploads deleted on Commons. If you are in fact the copyright holder for these cover images, please contact OTRS to provide permission for their use under a free license. If the permission is confirmed, the above file, and the 3 other deleted files can be restored. INeverCry 06:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Speedy_(band)

• Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Speedy_(band) · ( logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, JMH1963, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JMH1963 (talk) 23:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

• JMH1963, I restored this back in November and you made no edits on the page. You also requested that this be restored on June 5th, where another editor made mention of this and asked for reassurance that you would edit if we restored it a second time. I pinged you in the conversation but you made no response. Given that you've already had this restored once and you've done nothing and you've made a request a month ago - and you didn't respond to concerns there, this doesn't really make me all that confident that you'll edit the draft if we restore it this time. AfC is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• At this point if you don't respond this will become a not done by default - and it'll be even more unlikely that you'll ever have this restored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:06, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done JMH1963 left a message on my talk page saying that they'll work on the article this time around, so I'm giving it a good faith restoration. Fair warning, if this goes without edits again it will be very unlikely that we'll restore it a second time. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Société Mondiale des Créateurs

• Société Mondiale des Créateurs · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

a) The author was notified an intention to speedily delete the article for two motives (Blatant Promotion and No Claim Of Significance).

b) The author contested immediately each of the alleged motives and reviewed the article to remove all relevance to the administrator's remarks.

He also asked for Help of the appropriate wikipedia service and got a clear and positive response.

c) No answer were brought to his contestation and the article was deleted.

d) The article presented a non profit association registered in Mulhouse on 21 March 2013. It mentioned the historical tradition in which its foundation took place. It mentioned the recent change of the legal background which forms the object of its activity (a very recent decision of the Supreme Court was even mentioned in the argument notified to the administrator). The article quoted the rationale of its existence according to the statutes of the association.

The article only contained facts and did not reveal any "blatant promotion".

It represented a triple Claim of Significance: registered association, prestigious predecessors and unique international role. The latter was later omitted, though purely factual, because of the blatant promotion motive.

e) This is the reason why the author requests to the responsible administrator of Wikipedia to restore the article as a draft and to kindly advise on adding or subtracting any data he considers relevant.

Alain.souloumiac (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC) -Alain.souloumiac (talk) 08:58, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Alain.souloumiac, We cannot restore WP:A7 deletions at REFUND and WP:G11 deletions cannot be restored at all. Now you may want to ask Jimfbleak if he will e-mail you a copy of the article. (I've pinged him in this conversation.) Offhand it isn't overwhelmingly promotional, but I can see where the concerns come from since it does somewhat read like it was taken directly from the organization's website. (If it was, please understand that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material.) Now as far as notability goes, you need to show that via independent and reliable sources that focus specifically on the organization. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the society having an association with notable people or events. This can make it more likely that there will be coverage, but the society is not automatically notable because of this. I also have to note that someone founding a similar society years earlier does not automatically make this particular society notable. It just means that another society previously existed that covered the same topics. Now I also have to ask: what is your role in this society? I get the impression that you are someone that is involved with this society, which is likely why the article did come across as promotional. It's extremely easy for people with a close WP:COI to write about things in a promotional manner without realizing it because you're very closely involved and as such, are more likely to think about the topic in positive ways. You need to disclose this on your userpage if you are involved. I also have to warn you that your userpage also comes across as a little promotional in tone. Some material about yourself is fine, but your userpage should only be about yourself as it pertains to you editing on Wikipedia. Your userpage comes across as a mixture of a CV and a personal blog, neither of which are acceptable uses of your userpage. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:51, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• It looks like he was misdirected here, so I've left a note on his talk page pinging the person who directed him here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:01, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Rick Maurer

• Draft:Rick Maurer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Whitesourcerer, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Whitesourcerer (talk) 15:40, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Nicholas Newton

• Draft:Nicholas Newton · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Nnewton44 (talk) 15:49, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:V.R. Prabodhachandran Nair

• Draft:V.R. Prabodhachandran Nair · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Rpnpbr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. rpnpbr 15:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note that you will have to have all the facts in this biography supported by references, including multiple independent references. This is looking too much like a CV to be accepted as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

A2Z Support

• A2Z Support · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Dear Wiki team my page was tagged 16 hours ago on the basis that it is advertisement. As i was writing my first article on a publishing website. i doesn't know the wiki guidelines so i made the contents that looks more advertisement than encyclopedia and at that that time i also doesn't know about removing the hash tag put here by patrolling officer. So my page was just looked by the administrator and was deleted at once without giving me some warning to make my content right. I am so much disappointed as i have done so much efforts in writing my first article , atleast i should have been given the chance to prove my verdict. though i have putt the answer in Talk page after the tag been placed , it was also overlooked by the administrator. So it's my kind request to you to undelete my wiki page and let me edit the content again , as you can see on the A2Z Support page their are block left in which information is to be put in , so i will put the whole information from start and according to wikipedia policy guidelines. I will be please on your act of Kindness M. Asim Masoom Zubair (talk) 01:56, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Please note the article was deleted as a G11 and the author was directed to Deletion Review in this conversation: User_talk:NeilN#A2Z_Support_Page_Deletion. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done the article was purely promotional with just about no sentences that could be recycled. So it may as well be created from scratch as a draft. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:33, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

A2Z Support, again

• A2Z Support · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Peter Grabitz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G11. Please restore the page as I intend to improve & work on it. -Peter grabitz (talk) 10:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Peter grabitz (talk) 10:25, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Not done too promotional, see below for more. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

A2Z Support, third time

• A2Z Support · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi there , i am Tanmay Gomal , article writer at crowdsource, i request the undeletion of this page, deleted under G 11, as i am intended to improve this -Tanmay Gomal (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC) Tanmay Gomal (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Not done this article was written to be heavily promotional, with a completely wrong tone for an encyclopedia article. I would suggest that you start again from scratch, perhaps writing it as a draft in Draft:A2Z Support. Also independent references are needed to show notability rather than facebook pages. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• I wonder if Peter grabitz and Tanmay Gomal aren't just sockpuppets or meatpuppets of Asimbwp, as neither have any edits other than requesting this be undeleted. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 00:14, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

@Tanmay Gomal:: "Article writer at crowdsource" sounds as if you are a paid writer. In that case, read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and note particularly that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions by laws against covert advertising, to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a COI. JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Now there's also Peter Lil Mayer. Looks like we may have a meat situation here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Opened Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asimbwp. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Two of those had on their user pages "Article writer at Crowdsource" (i.e., paid editor), though one of them has blanked it. I think this is a case of paid editors rather than true sockpuppetry. I am thinking about a WP:COI/N entry. JohnCD (talk) 17:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

And the client will likely not give up hiring paid editors for this, so I have create-protected the article. If they want to work on it in draft space, that's fine. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:17, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

All four blocked as a result of the SPI, so I won't bother with COI/N. You're right to salt it, there will probably be more along in a minute. Incidentally, I see no evidence that this website, which seems to be a sort of multi-author blog, is notable. JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Romano-berber states page deleted by mistake?

• Romano-Berber states · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi, I was wondering why this page get deleted despite several years of work on it? It was a very serious wikipedia page, it seem that the creator that made it a long time ago was banned. -LuzLuz31 (talk) 10:55, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• You are correct in that Cresthaven, the main writer of this, was operated by user Brunodam who was banned. Most of the work was done from March to April 2014, so it was not years of work. However it was quite a substantial writing. If you can find a registered user, not connected to Brunodam, who wants to take responsibility for the page, perhaps it could be restored. If Brunodam wants to come back with a clean start, he could appeal his block. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kent A. Philpott

• Draft:Kent A. Philpott · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 71.94.81.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 71.94.81.133 (talk) 14:35, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 12:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Shaquille Murray-Lawrence

• Shaquille Murray-Lawrence · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page was deleted back in April. At the time of the AfD, he probably met WP:GNG anyways, but I didn't feel like arguing about it (plus, I knew he would meet WP:NGRIDIRON in a couple of months, anyways). Since that time, the player has made his professional debut in the CFL (see here), thereby meeting WP:NGRIDIRON. The admin who closed the AfD has been absent since May 14, therefore I came here believing that the undeletion would be uncontroversial. -Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:36, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. Articles deleted after a deletion discussion are considered "controversial" unless the deletion discussion ended in a speedy deletion or the XfD had little to no input from other users (in which case it's treated here as a PROD). —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 01:45, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done history restored onto recent recreation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Ebcwebstore.com

• Ebcwebstore.com · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted without any discussion & proper reasoning. The wiki pedia policy is to be neutral , the article was created by keeping in view the wiki policy . I do not have any personal & financial benifits which i have laready explained but more than three wiki users are after this page & deleted that with their own benefits. Thaere are other pages e.g amazon.com, ebay, flipcart and many more which is available on wiki. -Priyadarshivishal23 (talk) 05:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Not done This article was completely promotional, advertising for the store. Also, no independent references were provided to show notability. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 05:18, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:John_L._Spencer

• Draft:John_L._Spencer · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Samuel.Ling.Spencers, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samuel.Ling.Spencers (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. -- GB fan 11:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Idea Internet Network

• Idea Internet Network · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

IIN ad campaign has been the most talked about advertisement in India in the past six months. The word 'IIN' alone got more than half a million searches on Google in the month of May. I believe this deserves a mention on Wikipedia. I have followed and studied the apparently 'misleading' campaign. I wanted to make a page so that it would be convenient for users to know what the buzz was all about. -Rohit r m (talk) 11:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

@Rohit r m: I have moved the page to Draft:Idea Internet Network where you can work on it. It needs better references to verify what it says and show notability. If it has been the most talked about in India, you should have no difficulty finding them. JohnCD (talk) 16:48, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Keystone Symposia

• Draft:Keystone Symposia · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 173.164.44.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.164.44.249 (talk) 15:08, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The present draft reads like the organization telling the world about itself, and is almost entirely sourced to its own site. Wikipedia requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 16:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Ahmed Ibrahim Artan

• Ahmed Ibrahim Artan · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -A326 (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

HI I, A326, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13.,Please restore the page as I intend to work on it That person is a Somali politician and well unknown Somali writer, and his page has been deleted for 3 times which there's no reason to be deleted. I'm requesting un-deletion for that page. thanks

@A326: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Haaji Ibrahim Artan Beeldaaje, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Davewild (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 19:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Welbr dos Santos

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Welbr dos Santos · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, OfSaints, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. OfSaints (talk) 19:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

@OfSaints: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:20, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Compound events (natural and technological hazards)

• Draft:Compound events (natural and technological hazards) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted due to 6 month timeframe. Am now in a position to address comments. I have collated additional references to demonstrate the relevance of the topic. -Michael.Leonard.Au (talk) 01:15, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Michael.Leonard.Au, I'm going to decline this because there are some copyvio concerns with the article, as it was declined partially because it appeared to be a very close paraphrasing from one of the sources. That said, I will e-mail you a copy of the article so you can edit it and remove any copyvio concerns. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The Winner Twins request for undeletion

• The Winner Twins · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -SciFiChronicle (talk) 02:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Greeting Administrator, I posted a biographical page on The Winner Twins. I saw that their initial page, which was up for years, was taken down on a speedy deletion. I reviewed that page and agreed with the editor's reasoning, that though factual it was very poorly cited. I revised the page in its entirety, and used what I believe were acceptable citations. The page was again deleted; however,it was done under speedy deletion in less than one hour. As far as I have read, this should not have occurred so quickly. I believe the editor who took it down may have been responding to the previous speedy deletion request of months earlier. I looked at his suggestion,which suggested the page seemed like an advertisement, and that it should be rewritten, and I completely disagree. It seems completely factual to me and is repeating only citations from legitimate sources. I have no bone to pick with the editor who took it down, though I am unsure why this page needed to be so hastily deleted. I am also unsure if he is or is not an administrator. If not, I humbly request that the page be reviewed by an Admin, then re-instated. Or if he was, I would prefer a second opinion, and any advice on how to put the page back up. I hope to be doing many such articles, and after reviewing dozens, I find this one I did to be one of the least contentious I've seen. I do hope you will agree. Thank you.

• Not done SciFiChronicle, the page was deleted by an administrator (DESiegel) as unambiguous promotion and as such, this cannot be restored to Wikipedia. Looking at the article, I can see where the promotional concerns came from. While it doesn't scream "go here, buy buy buy", it does read as if it was written by a marketing/PR person that was paid to create the account. It doesn't look like this was tagged as a WP:G4 recreation of Winner Twins, although since it is a word-for-word recreation of the original article it would have qualified for speedy deletion under that criteria. Since it was deleted at AfD by postdlf, there is a specific route you need to go through if you want to contest the deletion. The first is that you need to contact postdlf and ask about creating a new article for the Winner Twins. If he declines, then you need to go through deletion review. However I do need to caution you that if it is recreated it will have to be completely re-written from scratch in order to deal with the promotional overtones. I also have to warn you that you will need to approach postdlf and/or DRV with a strong amount of sourcing in order to show notability, since all of the claims in the speedied article were in the article that was deleted months ago at AfD. Above all else, I'd like to ask that you not repost the content "as is" if this does get overturned anywhere, since it's likely that it will only be deleted again for promotional concerns. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• Now on a side note, it looks extremely likely that you are someone who was asked to create the article and as such, you have a conflict of interest. You can still edit with a conflict of interest, but you will need to disclose this on your userpage. Also, you will need to change your username to something that doesn't conflict with username guidelines as your username gives off the impression that you're here representing this blog. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• I was the admin who speedy deleted this as promotional, as the log should show. I was not then aware that this was an exact reposting of an article prevuously deleted via AfD discussion, or I would not have been so sanguine about recreation as a draft, and would have included G4 (recreation) in the deletion log. Shortly after I deleted the article, SciFiChronicle posted to my user talk page, at User talk:DESiegel#The Winner Twins. My respone is there to read, I think it is clear that I was not hostile to the subject or the poster, merely beliving that the tone of the article as it stood was not acceptable. I am myself an SF fan, and like to see good articles about SFnal subjcts on Wikipedia. I should add that while it is a good practice not to delete clearly unfinished articles too quickly, especially for things such as A7, this was posted as a clerly developed article in a single edit, and there is no reason to think that simply ignoring or tagging it would have resulted in the removal of the promotional tone. Thus speedy deletion one hour after posting was perfectly proper. In the same section of my talk page, Tokyogirl79 posted an analyis of the available sources that they was able to find; I reccomend that anyone trying to create a new version of this article should read it carefully. I don't know if this article was posted with a direct conflict of interst or just by a fan of the subject, and I don't care to speculate on the matter. But the comments above are correct on how a COI should be handled. I will not now override the decision above. If SciFiChronicle, or anyone else, wants to have an article about the Winner Twins on Wikipedia, a new vesion should be started in the Draft: namespace, carefully based on independent reliable sources and with a carefully neutral tone. When (and if) such a draft is complete, a post should be made at deletion review linking to the draft, and asking for permission to recreate the article. Such a draft should not be a reposting of the deleted version, nor anything very similar. DES ^(talk) 12:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi, this is SciFiChronicle and I would like to post an even simpler version for approval, and follow your directions, but I cannot figure out where you would like me to place it, as there is no place I can find on wikipedia called Draft: namespace. Can you please explain where that is? And how it differs from my sandbox? Thanks

Draft namespace is literally any and all pages whose titles start with "Draft:". —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 23:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter

• Draft:Dr. William A. Hunter · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Willermoz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Willermoz (talk) 04:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

I made the edits and gathered the new sources that further contribute to the validation of this being a person worthy of note, but I was unsure as to how to resubmit it. Now, I discover it has been deleted. "Save page" button below -Willermoz (talk) 04:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Paolo Vineis

• Draft:Paolo Vineis · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 151.68.40.124, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 151.68.40.124 (talk) 06:27, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:46, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:FayDay

• Draft:FayDay · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, JD29301, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JD29301 (talk) 08:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

The artist is very well known and relevant with a strong following. "Save page" button below -JD29301 (talk) 09:01, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Nicholas Newton, again

• Draft:Nicholas Newton · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Nnewton44 (talk) 10:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@Nnewton44: already  Done: the page Draft:Nicholas Newton was restored on 4 July after your previous request and is available for you to work on. For advice, see the reviewer's comments and WP:Notability (summary); also, if you are the subject of the article, see Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 10:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Ivan Djeparoski

• Ivan Djeparoski · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article Ivan Djeparoski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. I would like to add reliable references to the article. Thank you in advance — Preceding unsigned comment added by DafDz (talk • contribs) 10:41, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@DafDz:  Done. I have reset the timer, so you have seven days to add references to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Nnewton44/sandbox

• User:Nnewton44/sandbox · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nnewton44 (talk) 10:43, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@Nnewton44:  Not done - this material is now at Draft:Nicholas Newton, see two items above this, and that is where you should work on it. JohnCD (talk) 11:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:American Benefits Council

• Draft:American Benefits Council · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, JessieCheerio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. JessieCheerio (talk) 13:17, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@JessieCheerio: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Toy Network Star (Season 1)

• Toy Network Star (Season 1) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The Reason Why I Want This Page Undeleted Is Because It's Not Copyright -StaufferBuddy (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

• You are permitted to create the page again, but please say what the article is about, otherwise it will be deleted for no context again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Francisco D'Agostino

• Francisco D'Agostino · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 | afd3 | afd4 ) · [revisions]

Page was a soft delete without much discussion. The article was deleted by a confirmed sock-puppet abuser with a COI. The principle investigators suspected, but not could prove all the socks were a PR firm hired by various firms, entities, and persons.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Factsonlyplease39/Archive
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_85#ADDgrammar

In particular there has been some fishy operations around the pages for Derwick Associates and its owners, Alejandro Betancourt Lopez, Pedro Trebbau Lopez, and Francisco D'Agostino. Several of the user involved on one or more of these pages were found to be sock puppets with a similar COI. And one user, FergusM1970, openly admitted he had been paid by Derwick Associates to remove details from the page:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:FergusM1970
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Naruto2839/Archive

There are several reliable sources that state D'Agostino is indeed a founder and owner of Derwick Associates. There's plenty of news coverage and I think it merits a re-examination of the page. Righteousskills (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC) -Righteousskills (talk) 17:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

@Righteousskills:  Done - as a WP:SOFTDELETE the article is automatically restored on request, though it may be re-nominated at AfD. The more you can improve the referencing, the better. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. Righteousskills (talk) 18:16, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Just for posterity here, the article was nominated by a now-blocked sock. The deletion was made by an administrator. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Atomium 320 by 240 CCBY20 flickr Mike Cattell.jpg

• File:Atomium 320 by 240 CCBY20 flickr Mike Cattell.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This image was deleted with the edit summary "Violation of FoP". This is not correct. Per 17 USC §120(a): "The copyright in an architectural work that has been constructed does not include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building in which the work is embodied is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place." That does not apply exclusively to architectural works in the US...it means that creator of an architectural does not have any copyright claim to pictures, paintings, photographs, or other pictorial representations of the work, if the building is located in or ordinarily visible from a public place. Wikipedia is only subject to the copyright laws of the US...see the content policy Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights. Freedom of Panorama is not subject covered by any IP treaty between the US & Belgium (location of the work). This image should be tagged with Template:FoP-USonly and then re-added to Atomium. -AHeneen (talk) 17:45, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Already at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2015 July 5#File:Atomium 320 by 240 CCBY20 flickr Mike Cattell.jpg. —Cryptic 19:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Sorry. I didn't see that. AHeneen (talk) 13:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

shrimali

{{subst:refund|1= Shrimali Brahmin |2= This Page is belong to Shrimal is a place in India’s Rajasthan State . presently know as bhinmal. Shrimal is a combination of ” Shri ” and ” Mal ” . ” Shri ” is popularly interpreted as Laksmi , the goddess of wealth . ” Shri ” also means beauty and brightness , “Mal” means place . Thus Shrimal about 800 years ago was a beautiful prosperous place where along with other castes , Goldsmiths too lived , created pieces of beauty out of gold and prospered with other communities .

Unfortunately with constant invasions by foreigners on the North-Western borders of India , Shrimal broke down and thereby received the name Bhinmal . In Sanskrit language , the word Bhinna means broken or seperated and therefore Bhinmal means broken place . According to Shrimal Puran (part of Skanda Puran) due to curse of Rishi Gautam and Goddess Laksmi Shrimali Nagar decentrised and it’s prosperity and population come down. Since Shrimal Nagar suffered a lot, the people living there were forced to migrate. Most of them started migrating towards Gujarat and Marwar (Rajasthan). Therefore most of the Shrimali Brahmins presently residing in these two states, although they had moved and established presently all over the world with their traditional and modern profession too.

Scholar and specialized in Vedic culture of India, we can be better identified the “Shrimali Brahmin” in this Sanskrit Poem titled “Vayam Shrimali” means We are Shrimali. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vyaspunit2k (talk • contribs) 16:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

 Note: Not quite sure what is being requested here. Shrimali Brahmins has existed in mainspace since 2006 but was recently stubbed due to most of the material therein having been unreferenced for many years. Shrimal exists as a redirect to Bhinmal, the town's current name. And the requestor's sandbox (currently submitted to AfC) is apparently material on the Shrimali Brahmins, but entirely in Hindi. --Finngall ^talk 16:31, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Who s Lil Haze?

• Draft:Who Is Lil Haze? · ( talk | logs | links | watch | mfd ) · [revisions]

I, 70.123.172.54, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.123.172.54 (talk) 16:12, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:23, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not done, not only is this fairly promotional in tone but it's also WP:COPYVIO from this website. Wikipedia cannot accept articles that are taken from somewhere else, as copyright is automatically assumed and in this case, the material is far too promotional to use even if permissions were granted through a WP:ORTS ticket. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:11, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Sarakara Chakrajmal

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sarkara Chakrajmal · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Reason for deletion is mentioned as it was not edited for 6 month, now I will try that there are more contributions to page after it reappear -Madx62 (talk) 17:44, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 19:33, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

@Madx62:  Done — Earwig ^talk 03:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:BitShares

• Draft:BitShares · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The majority of the article was written in my own words (Other than Technology) and I would like to attempt to submit the article again with a more neutral point of view and revised tone. -Robrigo (talk) 18:19, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Note the draft was deleted as a copyright infringement, but the user was incorrectly sent here from the Teahouse, where I later posted the correct advice, which is to contact the deleting admin @Jimfbleak:. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

• Robrigo, the article was also fairly promotional in tone since it contained various marketing WP:PEACOCK terms and other buzzword-y phrases. It's extremely likely that even if this was restored, you'd still have to re-write it to fit NPOV guidelines. On a side note, if you are someone that was hired or otherwise asked to create the article (ie, anything that would pose a WP:COI issue), you will need to disclose this on your userpage. I'd also recommend that you go through one of Wikipedia's training modules like WP:ADVENTURE, just so you can get an overview of the basics of Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:06, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Andrew_Peterson_(author)

• Andrew_Peterson_(author) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Copyright Violation (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.andrewpeterson.com/about-the-author/) is unnecessary due to Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Creative Commons licensing explicitly presented on the page concerned.

(For context, the content on this page was also explicitly provided to me by the author with express permission to use in non-commercial documents.) -Justaleaf (talk) 20:06, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

CC-NC is not an acceptable licence on Wikipedia. Our content must be free to use even for commercial interests. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 20:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Not done Exactly what Jeremy said. That license is not compatible with Wikipedia. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I notified the original content author, who has revised the licensing on the page accordingly to the CC-BY 3.0. ( http://www.andrewpeterson.com/about-the-author/ ) With an attribution note and adaptation description, this is appropriate, is it not? Justaleaf (talk) 22:11, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

If the licensing conflict is no longer an issue, but the page isn't ready for approval, could we restore it to a draft so I can go about refining it for publishing? Justaleaf (talk) 00:33, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

 Done; the CV issue seems to be cleared at this point but I'm not convinced on notability (needs better sources). Leaving it in the mainspace for now. — Earwig ^talk 03:28, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

File:JudgeThomasHardiman.pdf

• File:JudgeThomasHardiman.pdf · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please undelete. Ticket#2015062610021489 as ccbysa3.0 -Willy Weazley 23:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

• Done User:Willy Weazley please add appropriate OTRS ticket template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:28, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

samacharpati.com

• Samacharpati.com · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Journalist.pralhad (talk) 05:08, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not done This was deleted as WP:A7 and cannot be restored here. Normally you'd ask the deleting admin to restore the page (and if they decline, go through deletion review, but this was also deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, which might prevent this from being restored. Offhand I don't see where it was overwhelmingly promotional so Deb may be willing to transfer a copy to AfC for you to work on. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:25, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:EcoVadis

• Draft:EcoVadis · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Alearca, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. We would like to restore the draft page in order to add changes to it -Alearca (talk) 08:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

@Alearca: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 09:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Chris Wagner

• Chris Wagner · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Request to restore edit history for recreated article. -Dolovis (talk) 12:49, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

•  Not done The last revision was a redirect to The Latch Brothers. The earlier version are on different people, like an NFL player and even earlier ones on likely non-notable people. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Nassir Navab

• Nassir navab · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Full professor at Johns Hopkins University and University of Technology Munich, Germany (TUM). Significant impact in the field of computer vision and medical imaging, with over 10k citations. Fellow of the MICCAI society, the organizer of the world’s leading conference on medical image computing and computer assisted intervention. One of the founders of IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). Is associate editor or on editorial board of the two journals in the field with the highest impact factor. Won Siemens Inventor of the Year award in 2001, holding 44 granted US and over 50 international patents. -OliverZettinig (talk) 15:13, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)) instead. An A7 deletion doesn't mean the subject isn't notable; it means the article doesn't explain why the subject is notable. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:53, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Creation of this page is permitted. What is written above is more than what was in the article. But what was deleted is fair enough to be deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:15, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

mackenzie & halbert

• Mackenzie & halbert · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

the page I simply created isn't for advertisement of the company as I have no benefit whatsoever. I think it shouldn't be deleted because the page was created simply to inform about the company, what they did do and what happened to them. I used notes to cite the information even though I am new to this yet you guys have to be this harsh, especially on newcomers. if you disagree then perhaps could you EDIT the page and take out what isn't needed even if it will leave little information behind. please reconsider. if there were problems concerning the article please highlight and change it for me this once. -Ozoneplayer (talk) 16:24, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. And I suggest to you to make use of our drafting process instead of posting directly to the considerably more-scrutinised mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 17:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

@Ozoneplayer:  Not done. If you want to know why this was thought promotional, consider these unedited extracts: "our clients... known for being agreeable and congenial... we have the capacity to present them with handy arrangements... The firm offers, for instance, expert Audit and Assurance administrations... dedicated to delivering the highest level of professionalism and expertise... " That is ad-speak, and anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. Other problems were (a) you gave no indication why this defunct accountancy firm is important or significant, or any different from a thousand others, i.e. why an encyclopedia should have an article about it, (b) inconsistency - you say the firm is defunct, but still write of it in the present tense; "The firm offers... Mackenzie & Halbert are dedicated... " and (c) lack of focus - the whole second half was general chat about accountancy, not about the company.

You can try again, but you should start from clean sheet. As Jeremy suggests, you would do well to use WP:Articles for creation which will let you prepare a draft for review. I will give some more advice on your talk page when I have time, within a day or two. Meanwhile read WP:Your first article JohnCD (talk) 18:11, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jem Jem Italia

• Draft:Jem Jem Italia · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, 62.10.114.195, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 62.10.114.195 (talk) 17:17, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note that in order to be accepted, the article needs to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. 18:16, 9 July 2015 (UTC)JohnCD (talk)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Multimedia Conferencing

• Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Multimedia Conferencing · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Prerna2526, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Prerna2526 (talk) 18:22, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

@Prerna2526: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Multimedia Conferencing. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. It is not clear whether the article is about the general subject or about a particular product: either way, it needs better referencing (the only external link is a dead-link) (a) to verify what it says, and (b) to establish Wikipedia:Notability, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 19:12, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Josh Reiner

• Josh Reiner · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

it is harming no one and this doesn't mean anything it's not like this person is taaking credit for anything but it akes no sense to delete it? whats your guys issue - . (talk) 02:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Cryptic (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

• Not done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:38, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Swati JaiHind

• Swati JaiHind · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi The page Swati Jaihind has been deleted without giving any chance to discuss on it. A lot of unfair and unjust attempts were made last night to vandalize the page. We are in the process of improving the page but why despite all the credible sources does it seem not wiki worthy? Being lesser known does not mean having no credible importance. The person concerned is a senior government official and someone who has been an activist for almost 10 years. All works are substantiated with adequate links. I request everyone to kindly discuss first before arriving at conclusions. I respect the seniority and contributions but we all have equal rights to voice our opinion and work on Wiki. -Gautamsingh93 (talk) 03:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC) Gautamsingh93 (talk) 03:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (NawlinWiki (talk · contribs)) instead. An A7 deletion basically says, This page does not explain why this subject is notable. Also, privately-owned websites have every right to curtail speech as they deem necessary, as you do not have a right to actually be here. (If you did, blocks and bans could not possibly exist.) —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Two points: (1) the sources cited mentioned Ms. Swati Maliwal only in passing. Neither was *about* her. The first story merely quoted her once, and the second merely said that she was leading a project. That doesn't satisfy our notability criteria, WP:BIO, or our sourcing criteria, WP:V. (2) It's interesting that both articles refer to Ms. Maliwal only by her real name, but you keep trying to post the article using her promotional nickname, "Swati JaiHind" ("Jai Hind" means "long live India"). That supports our conclusion that the article is meant to promote and publicize Ms. Maliwal. We don't allow that, see WP:SPAM. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:24, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Teleperformance Philippines

• Teleperformance Philippines · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi, we are trying to put up an article about our company for the sole reason of having a content online. Please note that this is not for advertising purposes. Our global counterpart already has an existing article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teleperformance we would like to put up articles for each subsidiary. This will just supply as a reference in the future. -JeffreyJohnsonTP (talk) 03:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Please note that all articles must be backed up by multiple reliable sources that discuss the subject at length, with editorial oversight and no connection to the subject what-so-ever. Other articles' presence or absence is irrelevant (and I will note Teleperformance needs a severe rewrite), and I will note that saying "having a content online"[sic] is a good phraseology for getting your article to remain deleted. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Naveen_Jaihind

• Naveen Jaihind · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

She is on Delhi Government official post, Should have a wiki page -NaveenJaihind (talk) 06:00, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here. The page was taken to DRV already and its deletion endorsed, so the only recourse left for you is to contact the admin who closed the AfD. I also suggest you change your username as soon as possible. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 07:12, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

User:Arts and Adventure/sandbox

• User:Arts and Adventure/sandbox · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page does not violate the copyright rule and is only in use for my own series that is not official. I don't tend to include this page from any other franchise, series, stories, or etc. This series is my own creation and as well as everything described within this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arts and Adventure (talk • contribs) 08:54, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Arts and Adventure:  Not done - sorry, but Wikipedia is not a place to post original work, even in sandboxes - see Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought and Wikipedia is not a web-hosting service. There are plenty of places on the Internet where you can post your work: you could try DeviantArt or Wikia, or you may get some ideas from Wikipedia:Alternative outlets. JohnCD (talk) 13:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

kadanganeri

• Kadanganeri · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I, Aravinthan AS, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. A.Aravinthan 12:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Aravinthan AS: all that has been deleted is the original draft at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kadanganeri. The actual page Kadanganeri has not been deleted. JohnCD (talk) 13:09, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

WNISEF

• WNISEF · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was made during wiki-training by a novice from Ukraine and experienced user from uk-wiki had no time to improve it. It did not contain copyvio but was very short. Please recreate it in my personal space so novice can improve it. Thank you. -Brunei (talk) 14:28, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Brunei:  Done to User:Brunei/WNISEF. Get your learner to check out WP:Notability and the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and tell him to take care not to copy from the organization's website, which would likely be (a) copyvio and (b) too promotional in tone. Check with the deleting administrator, RHaworth (talk) before restoring it to the main space. JohnCD (talk) 18:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

The Master Key System

• The Master Key System · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This article seems to have disappeared. I don't know why. I have searched for some record of its deletion or merger and have found none. I think that it is a notable book and should be part of Wikipedia. I can give evidence of notability if required -Jane Taaaa (talk) 15:20, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jane Taaaa: You don't need undeletion for that. See The Master Key System: Revision history. It's all there. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:08, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

(edit conflict) It is possible, by an admittedly devious route, to find out what happened. When clicking on a page takes you to a different page, the first one has probably been redirected to the second. In this case, when clicking on the book's title takes you to the article about its author, scrolling to the top of the page shows, just beneath the title, a line "(Redirected from The Master Key System)". That gives a link which takes you back to the actual redirect page, and then clicking on "View history" shows you what has happened.

The page was redirected to the article about the book's author on 17 June by user Boleyn (talk) with edit summary "redirect; I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NBOOK or WP:GNG, and neither has anyone else in the more than 7 years it's been tagged."

Boleyn's edit could simply be reverted, restoring the article, but I suggest that you discuss with her what evidence of notability for the book you can provide. "Notability" has a special sense in Wikipedia: the test is whether there has been "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." WP:GNG is the general statement, and WP:NBOOK is specifically about books. JohnCD (talk) 17:17, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Johnny Terris

• Johnny Terris · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted in a deletion discussion in February 2014 due to lack of notability. Recently an IP editor disrupted the archived/closed deletion discussion because they believe the article was wrongfully deleted. I'm requesting for an admin to restore the article at Draft:Johnny Terris so that we can look into this guy's notability again. I would also like for an admin to check whether the IP's concerns are true: that the article was defaced prior to the AfD to remove all signs of notability and that the voters at AfD didn't check the history and didn't look for sources themselves. I don't know if this is true but there's only one way to find out. It does appear to be true that some bloggers at Tumblr were messing with that article, I found some of their posts. -— Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

@Jeraphine Gryphon: I'm not happy to restore this to draft on the basis of the IP's accusations, because the AfD discussion shows that people did check the history and also looked for sources without success. There was certainly some silly vandalism, I guess by his pals, but I have done some spot-checking in the history and I don't see any previous version that shows notability. I will ping Stifle, the closing admin, for his view. Mine is that if we do anything it should be a formal DRV, when the article could be temp-undeleted for checking; but I think the AfD got it right, and I am inclined to do nothing unless actual evidence of notability is produced. JohnCD (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for checking, but I'm confused now. DRV seemed like the wrong place, that's why I brought it here. And I was asking for draftification because that way it might be easier to show notability, by editing it. The IP made some claims on their talk page (User talk:104.156.228.85) about why they think Terris is notable (it sounds good but they didn't give any concrete proof), but they're also saying that they're not very Wikipedia-savvy and I, as I told them, am not volunteering to go and do any outside research on this person. So, uh. This isn't looking very good, I guess. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:15, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Actually, Jeraphine, you have a point about DRV - it wouldn't really be appropriate when the AfD result was so clear, though people do use it like that. Let us wait for Stifle's opinion - as deleting admin, it is really his call.

IP user, if you are reading this, please read WP:Notability (people), particularly the section WP:NACTOR, and WP:Notability (summary). It seems Terris was "actor, filmmaker, writer, artist, photographer and visual video editor" but even in the fullest version of the deleted article there is no claim, let alone evidence, of notable achievements in any of those fields. Can you provide links to some substantial independent comment about him and his work? JohnCD (talk) 19:37, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

He has 21 credits dating back to 1987 on his imdb: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1592202/

Was featured in ArtSlant Magazine http://www.artslant.com/global/artists/show/110855-johnny-terris Preference Magazine http://postimg.org/image/ymxq3di39/ http://postimg.org/image/pa9ykn4wj/ Was featured in The Fascinating, Famous, Unusual & Unforgettable Magazine http://postimg.org/image/it72vr89f/

Was part of and featured in The Thin Veil Art Gallery in Los Angeles http://www.artslant.com/la/events/show/74317-the-thin-veil

Was featured in multiple time and drawings of him are a permanent collection in the renowned Leslie-Lohman Gallery in NYC https://www.facebook.com/LeslieLohmanMuseum/photos/gm.1413420608965869/887830407978216/

Is an author: http://www.amazon.com/Sinister-Splendor-And-Broken-Glass/dp/1320812155

Was a well known male model: http://www.booksamillion.com/p/Articles-Canadian-Male-Models-Including/Hephaestus-Books/9781242617119

There are others... the point here is that the article was deleted due to bullying and they admitted to screwing with his wikipedia and laughed about it on tumblr, including saying that they were going to have him deleted. He is currently a lead in a television series with an Oscar winning actress (and there will be many more notable links once the show comes out next month). I think if people like Chris Crocker and youtube 'stars' can be on Wikipedia, I don't see why an actual artist with over 25 years of experience can't be?? The reason why not much is on the net about him is because his work until recently was underground film stuff and that's not popular though is VERY influential, as the links above can plainly see. Just because certain people here haven't heard of him doesn't mean he isn't notable or credible enough to be here. He was here for over a decade with zero problems. His page here on wikipedia was fine until these kids started attacking it. And then it was deleted without any checking as to see if the stuff that was said was even legitimate or not. They just took these kids words over any other explanation. It was vandalism, pure and simple and should be re-instated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.156.228.106 (talk) 20:28, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

IP, it is simply not true that the article "was deleted without any checking as to see if the stuff that was said was even legitimate or not". The whole history of a Wikipedia article is visible, and it is clear from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Terris that those who contributed looked at the history as well as the current version, and also looked outside for references. Yes, there was silly vandalism on the page, but it was reverted; also a longer version was cut back with edit summary "removed pointless references" but the material removed was just a list of activities, none of which suggested notability, and the longer version was visible in the history.

IMDb is not considered a reliable source here because people can and do edit their own entries; the Male Models book is simply reprints of Wikipedia articles; some of the other references only mention his name. The ArtSlant one is more substantial, but is much the same as material which was added to the article with edit summary "more info from bio from official website", suggesting that it was a press release.

Altogether, I am not convinced he is notable, but maybe we should let you have a go at showing that he is. If Stifle does not object, I will restore the article into a draft. That will not be till Sunday, as I am out all day tomorrow. If you are going to work on this, I suggest you register an account, which is easy and free. JohnCD (talk) 22:02, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Geecon global article please do not delete

• Geecon global · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Usingpain (talk) 05:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC) Kindly requesting you to please do not delete the page of Geecon global, i will follow all the rules & regulation regarding articles. geecon global page is not based on promotion, I have created it only a pofile of the company

• Usingpain, this page was deleted via WP:G11 as "unambiguous promotion". A look at the page shows that it was extremely promotional which means that it is unlikely that this page would be restored on Wikipedia at all. It also looks like it was fairly liberally taken from the official website, which brings about issues of copyright. However that said, I would be willing to e-mail you a copy of the page so you can work on this. My only request is that you create this page via WP:AfC and that you go through one of Wikipedia's training modules like WP:ADVENTURE. The good thing about AfC is that if you mess up and the article is not accepted for the mainspace, you will be given a chance to fix this and resubmit it. Sometimes AfC articles will be deleted but this is somewhat rare. (Mostly pages are deleted because they are abandoned, although the next most common deletion reason is usually WP:COPYVIO.) The module would be beneficial since it would give you a good overview of policy, plus it would be a good faith gesture on your part since you are likely editing with a conflict of interest. (If you are, you need to disclose this on your userpage.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
• Not done per above. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:59, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Request

• [[:No.1 I believe that the notablity is already satisfied on I translate. Still as per international Citaion, I create French page giving more weightage to local news first, The User lomita deleted without any discussion. I am not trying to fight but I am not new while nor expert to. SO i request to look into this.]] · ( [[|talk]] | logs | links | [{{fullurl: No.1 I believe that the notablity is already satisfied on I translate. Still as per international Citaion, I create French page giving more weightage to local news first, The User lomita deleted without any discussion. I am not trying to fight but I am not new while nor expert to. SO i request to look into this. |action=watch}} watch] ) · [revisions]

I created a Wikipedia french(translation from spain to French) page of the person name Eric Duval(https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89ric_Duval), This person has notablility - https://www.google.co.in/search?q=eric+duval&espv=2&source=lnms&tbm=nws&sa=X&ei=fOmgVaaLNMmyuAT_qIj4AQ&ved=0CAcQ_AUoAQ&biw=1280&bih=923 | Page that got deleted fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Éric_Duval-Rgema (talk) 10:05, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

• Rgema, are you asking for us to undelete the English page or are you asking about the pages on another language Wikipedia? Either way, this cannot be done via REFUND, as the page for Eric Duval was deleted via WP:A7 back in 2009 and as for other language WPs, we cannot restore any articles on those sites at all. You must address this via that Wikipedia's undeletion processes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
• Not done It looks like you were talking about the French Wikipedia. You will need to take this up there with User:Lomita, as the English Wikipedia's administrators do not have any control over what is or isn't on other Wikipedia sites. It also looks like the page was deleted via a discussion at fr:Discussion:Éric_Duval/Suppression (or at least the consensus there was that Duval did not pass guidelines), so if you try to go about restoring it you will need to show how Duval has received enough coverage to pass WP FR's notability guidelines. Each Wikipedia has its own guidelines for notability, so just because something has a page on the Spanish language Wikipedia does not mean that it would automatically merit a page on the French Wikipedia or on any other language's Wikipedia site. Heck, the existence of a page on the Spanish language Wikipedia might not even mean that it would pass notability guidelines there, since it might just mean that the page does fail their notability criteria but it hasn't been detected and deleted yet. (Note: I do not know what ES Wikipedia's guidelines are, so I'm falling back on what we would tell people that try to say "but this has a page" on here.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks Tokyogirl79. But I do understand if a page is in spanish doesnt not qualify but other notability also are being passed. I will take care from here thanks a lot