Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 341: Line 341:
*{{revisions|File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg}}
*{{revisions|File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg}}
The FFD discussion is recently closed as "free to use" in en wiki. Therefore, previous revisions should be undeleted. —[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 17:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
The FFD discussion is recently closed as "free to use" in en wiki. Therefore, previous revisions should be undeleted. —[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 17:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
:*{{not done}} I do not agree with FFD result. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 00:38, 16 March 2017 (UTC)


== Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Antonello ==
== Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Antonello ==

Revision as of 00:38, 16 March 2017


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts
"WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Nils Bildt

Deleted about 48 hours after PROD tag. I was counting on the standard 7 days. I intended to contest the deletion and remove the PROD tag after gathering some additional references over the weekend. —Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 06:11, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I think I phrased that unclearly. I intended to contest and do contest this PROD. I delayed removing the PROD tag only to do so concurrently with checking references I'd already found and editing them in, hoping to avoid going straight to AfD over WP:ONEEVENT. Matt Fitzpatrick (talk) 19:23, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have deleted this under A7 due to lack of a claim of importance. The text also looked as if it was a criticism of the subject. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:27, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Delaney

Just looking to have the article sent to my sandbox as the deleter said that they would not do it and that here was the place to request such an action. —Fleets (talk) 19:53, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks.Fleets (talk) 18:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Credihealth

CSD A7 states "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance." But the article claims with reliable sources: Credihealth "launched an around-the-clock ambulance request service in Gurgaon, the first of it's kind in India where ambulatory medical care is unreliable." yahoo article, https://www.yahoo.com/news/credihealth-introduces-24-hour-ambulance-083214069.html.

Three articles that cover Credihealth: Business Standard India: http://www.business-standard.com/article/companies/how-credihealth-helps-you-choose-the-right-doctor-115092400317_1.html

The Economic Times: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/small-biz/startups/credihealth-perfiniti-folksvagn-shaadi-e-khaas-four-start-ups-with-innovative-ideas/articleshow/32089651.cms

Yahoo News: https://www.yahoo.com/news/credihealth-introduces-24-hour-ambulance-083214069.html

Credihealth is one the oldest healthcare player in India, It has 1000's of doctors on his platform. You can check some of doctors under Credihealth on Wikipedia, Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Search&limit=100&offset=0&profile=default&search=Credihealth&searchToken=ekv0xd29ktg0jx5wahxdw1qyf

I would request you to please recheck the article and un-delete it. Also would like to please have a full discussion about this article. — — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahonaakaho (talk • contribs) 01:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is an unconfessed paid advertisement motivated by the company, as shown at Draft:Credihealth, which is currently nominated as such, and also the article being deleted for the same criteria: Self-advertising. The sources above, with easy examination, show clear labels showing the company as the author, including using their own company-hosted words. Wikipedia is not the place to advertise and that's exactly why, so restarting or resubmitting is not an alternative. As a precaution, I gave the user one final warning to cease self-advertising earlier today and, as for the full discussion, they are aware of the MfD linked above; the Yahoo! link itself is a labeled press release, and this wouldn't satisfy our simplest standards. SwisterTwister talk 03:38, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikipedia is open source platform with lakhs of information being shared every day with lakhs of people. Firstly I am not at all associated with Credihealth or any such company, Kindly verify the edits going on from my iP as compare to Company IP if you have any. Secondly, If you verify other References available on Deleted page they are referring Geniune News from popular Indian media. I accept That ambulance part has missing proper Ref. but scope of improvement is there, If you will please allow me to do so. Thirdly and most importantly, I am not paid anything by anyone. I just copied draft from Draft:Credihealth Modified some data and then published it. Please let me know what part of article you find advertising, I will Improve that part from my end. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kahonaakaho (talk • contribs) 04:21, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
I don't see being the first ambulance service in a town as a credible claim of significance either. It may be significant to that locality, but every city has an ambulance service that could claim to be "first" in that city, and we don't write articles about each of them just because of that. ~Anachronist (talk) 06:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anachronist: It is first one in whole India, which is seventh largest country in world. So this is significant to a country.--Eliteal1122 (talk) 08:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James MacDonald

I, TeepTeep, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TeepTeep (talk) 04:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Grado

A few years back I ended up investing more time than expected into this article after reading an interview with Jonathan Grado in Esquire Magazine. I thought I'd be writing more articles, but life happens and I ended up with one article I'm proud of. I recently saw the subject of this page on a tv show and thought I'd check on the article, only to find it was deleted. I'm not too sure why it was deleted, but with all the credible sources I had gathered from film and print (WIRED magazine, New York Times, TechCrunch from what I remember) I don't really see why this was removed. Some Googling brought me to a recent commercial American Express had featured him in as well. I'd be happy to update sources if need be. —Jennifer.roselyn (talk) 18:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:WSP Square Logo Trademarked (4) (1).png

I am new to Wikipedia and was unsure of what to put under "non-free content criteria". Now that I have become better acquainted, I wish to submit this photo under the justification that it meets all 10 Wikipedia requirements for usage, and in adding the tag {{Non-free logo}} to the photo itself. As this is the official logo for the organization for which I am editing a page, there is no free equivalent. Its usage will not infringe on the intended commercial opportunities for it. The photo will only be used once, in finalizing and publishing Draft:Warrior-Scholar Project, and has been published multiple times both on the Warrior-Scholar Project webpage, and in various news articles. Should the image be restored, I will personally edit the description page in order to reflect a better understanding of the non-free use rationale, with all necessary information provided. —96.95.24.97 (talk) 20:06, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Khojaly Massacre recognition

I will place some information from that deleted article here —Interfase (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Graeme Bartlett, Sandstein referred them here so I think that he's OK with sending this to userspace - it's just not something he personally does. I've pinged him to see what he thinks. I would argue that the Khojaly massacre memorials page could probably be merged into the main article as well and edited down for brevity, perhaps just a list of each country that has a memorial, with the only exceptions being where the memorial is especially controversial or noteworthy - ie, where the memorial itself would possibly warrant its own page or where the coverage is very, very extensive and goes beyond stories about it being built and notifications of opening ceremonies and such. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 15:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Wooldridge

Can provide additional data to support the subject —159.147.173.91 (talk) 09:06, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • This looks like it was deleted twice per user request and at one point was moved to User:Janweh64/Nicholas Wooldridge as per a request by its creator, Janweh64. There is a little bit of article history that wasn't included in the move, so I've merged that with the other article in case Janweh could use it. Since it is in another users's userspace I'd recommend checking in with Janweh64 before making any edits just to see what his plans are. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I will transfer it back to draft. I was preserving in case someone was interested in future.—አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 06:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good Shepherd English School

Please do restore the article. It is one of the 3 CBSE schools in Karaikal port city. It has its one significance. Many students who studied there made a record like a twins studying in the school for the first time in India got the black belt in Karate.--wiki tamil 100 (talk) 09:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Patient Zero

Would just like my user page reinstated, still on indef wikibreak but looking back I didn't really want to delete my userpage. —Patient Zerotalk 10:00, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andre Duza

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —2601:43:0:4AE0:303A:D0B3:A8B7:7AD7 (talk) 14:52, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andre Duza, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Einar Kuusk

This article was recreated after previous deletions. Can anyone please undelete the deleted revisions of this article? —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 02:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a ripe candidate for deletion to me in spite of three AFDs. I see no evidence of meeting WP:NACTOR criteria for inclusion, and I'm surprised the point was neither made nor refuted in the AFD discussions. Being "mentioned" in sources doesn't confer notability, and neither does routine coverage. I have no objection to restoring the history, but the deletion of this should have way more intelligent, policy-grounded discussion than has happened yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bandicam

Please visit https://www.google.com/search?q=bandicam%20wikipedia I have no idea why I can't find the Bandicam page on en.wikipedia.org. Someone must have made a mistake. You can see the Bandicam page in different languages such as https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/반디캠, https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam, https://ar.wikipedia.org/wiki/باندي_كام , https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bandicam and https://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/แบนดิแคม I believe that Bandicam is notable enough to go into en.wikipedia.org. —Zune2000 (talk) 08:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done It was deleted via WP:PROD, so it can be restored here. As far as it existing on other foreign language Wikipedias, be careful since notability guidelines can differ greatly depending on the guidelines for that particular language and the English WP tends to be the most strict of the group. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Johnny Bullet

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Hervé Utoro (talk) 11:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Swiss Draw in Ultimate Frisbee

I, Cschff, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cschff (talk) 15:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sworn In (band) 'a newer band has deleted our page but we were there in 2002 and are reforming, please reinstate'

Because a band that came several years after ours has decided to delete out page that was up for many years on Wikipedia. and then click the "Save page" button below —Storieshollywood (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) There do not appear to have been previous incarnations of Sworn In (band) prior to its creation in 2014, but Sworn in (band) existed and was A7 speedy deleted in 2010. (The apparent creator of the latter article appears to have no other undeleted edits.) Sworn In was created as a redirect to Oath in 2015, after a previous article with that title was A7 speedy deleted in 2007. Not being an admin, I have no access to the deleted content to see if either of the deleted articles referred to the earlier band mentioned above. --Finngall talk 20:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The deleted article is unrelated. The existing Sworn In (band) and Sworn in have no deleted contributions. The lead sentence of the deleted Sworn in (band) starts out "Formed in early 2001 members included Del Jae, Buddy Hell, Steve Meader and Alex and Matt Smith and were known for their abrasive live shows and certain members for their distinct fashion sense." The article has zero sources. The article claims the band released one EP under two different reasonably-notable indie labels, Bridge 9 Records and Reflections Records. If it were restored, it would be deleted again because WP:BAND requires two albums released under a notable label. Therefore, this request is no Declined (and it is ineligible for restoration anyway due to being deleted as WP:A7).
@Storieshollywood: I suggest you start over in draft space, say Draft:Sworn In (punk band) or something similar, then submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. You must do it this way because you have a conflict of interest. And be mindful that the article won't be accepted unless it meets the guidelines in Wikipedia:Golden rule as well as criteria in WP:BAND. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Storieshollywood: I've changed the Sworn In links on the record label pages above to point to Sworn In (punk band). If an article on your band makes it to main article space under a different title, please be sure to update those other links accordingly. --Finngall talk 21:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:SCAD Diving

Hi, unfortunately I missed the opportunity to carry my work on the draft and forgot about the 6 month rule. I would like to contiue. I only got a reminder today, but the draft had already been deleted :-( please restore! —Scad Diver (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Adison

I'm interested in restoring this article and wondered if the deleted one had salvageable content. Adison is notable - see the articles in French and German. —Chubbles (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks Chubbles (talk) 00:33, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Antoine Ramy

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jack Taffy (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Taffy (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2017 (UTC) Hi, I am new here and I don't know why this has happened. I just want to know why the page cannot be created and what could be done to fix it? If someone did something wrong while posting this persons what is the mistake of Mr, Tony (Antoine) in it. Please tell me how to fix the article.[reply]

Maykel Montiel

meets WP:NFOOTBALL, 7 caps per Nicaragua national football team#Current squad - I will add a reference —Nfitz (talk) 10:38, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barney & Friends (2017 TV series)

Move to Draft:Barney & Friends (2017 TV series) for improvement. I don't think this is a hoax. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you got any references at all that suggest this is real? The only reference on that page did not mention the show. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: This and this looks reasonably convincing to me that it isn't a hoax, but I question the value of having a Wikipedia article about a show that doesn't quite exist yet. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Edie McKee Harper

I, Worldbruce, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Worldbruce (talk) 06:13, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:05, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reef_Williams

will add reference to page —Needhs (talk) 07:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Surfing in India

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —JohnSeatonCallahan (talk) 10:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everything I said is true.

It doesn't matter if it is about myself - I used a completely neutral point of view.

Like I said previous, I have read numerous articles about surfing in India where my projects in the Andaman Islands, Andhra Pradesh and Diu Island were completely uncredited - very annoying.

Even MORE annoying is when people take credit for things I have done - ?

Isn't that what an encyclopedia is for? To be a reference of FACTS?

That's is exactly what I am doing - stating FACTS.

Restore the deleted material from "Surfing in India" immediately, please -

I am not doing anything wrong - I did read the guidelines. Read what I wrote and posted - before you automatically delete it.

Thank You

JohnSeatonCallahan (talk) 10:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)johnseatoncallahan[reply]

JohnSeatonCallahan the page has not been deleted. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 16:00, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dodger67: I believe JohnSeatonCallahan is complaining that his edits got deleted. This was a blatant violation of Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, so it was correct to delete the material, regardless of how factual it was. John, an encyclopedia's purpose isn't to be a reference of facts. See WP:INDISCRIMINATE for guidance on this. There are many facts available, but not all of them are encyclopedic; that is, not all facts are suitable for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Furthermore, because you have a conflict of interest, you should propose your contribution on the talk page rather than attempt to add it yourself. Continued attempts at self-promotion will result in your account being blocked. Also read WP:BURDEN. If something you want to add is removed, the burden is on you to gain support for your addition on the article's talk page. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:09, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mark Robinson (meteorologist)

I, Sundog22, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sundog22 (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline of Facebook

The page was speedy deleted under WP:G11. I was a major contributor to the page, but forgot to make a local backup. I would like the wikitext (before any possible large removals from the page; the page as of 2017-03-01 should be fine) emailed to me. —Riceissa (talk) 23:26, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. It seems that the same administrator JzG deleted Timeline of Twitter, Timeline of Instagram, Timeline of Pinterest, Timeline of Snapchat, Timeline of LinkedIn as G11, without anyone proposing them for deletion. I'm wondering if this was an inadvertent slip of an automated tool, since there isn't really a precedent for long-standing articles to be deleted suddenly without community review. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have just restored Timeline of Facebook at this point, and we can ask JzG to reverse the other deletions. Checking the content of the articles, they do not appear to be promoting these platforms. Deletion also looks to be controversial for these timeline pages. It started with the deletion of Timeline of GitHub and then a bunch were deleted in two minutes. Timeline of Monsanto was deleted at 13:15. And it looks as if Twinkle was the tool doing the deletes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:05, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, why not. It's not as if someone paid for these advertorial timelines to be created in order to boost their SEO or anything. Wait! That is EXACTLY what happened! I am mystified by our current determination to give spammers what they want. Guy (Help!) 11:52, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @JzG: so this was deliberate, and not accidental? Since when do we delete long-standing articles that have contributions from established editors without proper review? AFD would have been the better venue. If you objected to Riceissa's recent changes, you could have just reverted them. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have a problem with characterising someone a a long established editor when they are part of a paid editing pyramid scheme. The fact that they got away with it for a long time does not make them anything other than a spammer. I admire your good faith, but I am afraid it is misplaced. Guy (Help!) 07:53, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Well, it's a bunch of sockpuppets working together to create articles and making a profit out of it Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Vipul.27s paid editing enterprise., so... Exemplo347 (talk) 23:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sachin G lokapure

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Jaycot (talk) 06:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC) Plz see patent of lokapure don't delete page plz restore a man work independently granted 50 design patent in india[reply]

Jutta Barth

I, WS ReNu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. WS ReNu (talk) 12:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Lectonar (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fetchr

Was deleted by the creator, but needs to be revived, some data was previously missing. —Bkshots (talk) 19:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ready10

Wish to re-edit this page now that there is more content available for inclusion —5.148.15.234 (talk) 13:06, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Golf Boost

I, Rafagorgory, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rafagorgory (talk) 15:28, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rotary Club of SoHo Hong Kong

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —112.118.236.74 (talk) 15:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Rotary Club is still an active service organization in Hong Kong.

Symsyn

There are many good resources on the web about this programming language that could be made into an article. Since this page has been created before, I'd like to have it restored so I can build upon what was originally there before it got deleted. —<<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ellie Baskett

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —24.52.160.82 (talk) 18:59, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Second Day after Good Friday

Invalid deletion: Easter is the second day after good friday —73.1.57.180 (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done It is, however the deletion rationale ("Recently created, implausible redirect") also addresses whether or not someone is likely to use that term as a redirect. To be very honest, I don't really think that it's a common enough search term to warrant a redirect. Most people looking for content on Easter will just go to the article itself rather than search with this term. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:44, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Google Maps Icon.png

File has sbeen deleted on Commons per c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Google Maps Logo.svg. Needs to be uploaded locally under fair use (again). —(t) Josve05a (c) 00:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Downtown by Petula Clark UK vinyl A-side.jpg

The FFD discussion is recently closed as "free to use" in en wiki. Therefore, previous revisions should be undeleted. —George Ho (talk) 17:10, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Antonello

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Anthony Antonello (talk) 19:42, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OntoStudio

I have started this article and went offline for three hours to collect some academic references which I want now to include to increase the quality and objectivity of the article. Unfortunately, the article stub was deleted in the meantime. I am a researcher and do research in the field of ontologies. Please help. Thanks!! —Ontologician (talk) 20:28, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=770535915"