Jump to content

Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
7 users left. rm India Biography (blocked indef by 331dot ).
Reporting SAEINDIA. (TW)
Line 24: Line 24:
*{{user-uaa|1=CRM Kapture}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. [[User:The Mirror Cracked|The Mirror Cracked]] ([[User talk:The Mirror Cracked|talk]]) 07:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=CRM Kapture}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. [[User:The Mirror Cracked|The Mirror Cracked]] ([[User talk:The Mirror Cracked|talk]]) 07:45, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=CartRight.pk}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. [[User:Edible Melon|Edible Melon]] ([[User talk:Edible Melon|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Edible Melon|contribs]] '''·''' [[Special:Block/Edible Melon|block user]]) 09:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=CartRight.pk}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. [[User:Edible Melon|Edible Melon]] ([[User talk:Edible Melon|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Edible Melon|contribs]] '''·''' [[Special:Block/Edible Melon|block user]]) 09:59, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
*{{user-uaa|1=SAEINDIA}} – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username that implies shared use. [[User:Edible Melon|Edible Melon]] ([[User talk:Edible Melon|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contribs/Edible Melon|contribs]] '''·''' [[Special:Block/Edible Melon|block user]]) 10:01, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:01, 4 February 2020

    Usernames for administrator attention

    This page is intended for reports of usernames that are blatant and serious violations of the username policy requiring an immediate block. Reports will be assessed in accordance with the username policy, the UAA instructions, and the following bullet points. Please ensure you are familiar with the assessment criteria before making a report.

    1. Except in the instance of an egregious name violation, please do not report accounts with no edits or those who have not edited in the preceding 2 weeks.
    2. Real names are permitted, except when the editor implies they are someone other than themselves, such as impersonating a notable living person.
    3. Promotional names require evidence to be blocked. Do not report a username merely because it "appears" promotional.
    4. For libellous usernames or usernames that contain another editor's nonpublic personal information, please contact an oversighter and do not report it here.
    5. Discuss less-serious violations with the user on their talk page so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith. Templates such as {{Uw-username}} or {{Uw-coi-username}} may be used. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
    6. Do not leave a username warning on a user's talk page and also immediately report them here. Do one or the other, and not both simultaneously.
    7. Patrollers are asked to remove reports that have been declined, are bot-reported false positives or are otherwise non-blatant or stale reports.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
    This page was last updated at 12:58 on 10 July 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.

    User-reported

    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. N.J.A. | talk 11:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. 331dot (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Not a blatant violation of the username policy. This doesn't seem to be an actual group, and potential shared use alone does not warrant an immediate block. It appears to be one user at the moment. 331dot (talk) 01:41, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Wait until the user edits. 331dot (talk) 01:39, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Comment: @331dot: I'd just as soon go ahead and block this, but I have a low tolerance for scatology. -- Deepfriedokra 06:32, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I might have blocked if it were a stronger word than poop, but that's pretty mild compared to some of what I see here. I don't mind any action you wish to take, though. 09:55, 4 February 2020 (UTC)