User talk:Teflon Peter Christ/Archive 2021

Archives

2008 • 2009 • 2010 • 2011 • 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015 • 2016 • 2017 • 2018 • 2019 • 2020 • 2021 • 2022

Your GA nomination of Love for Sale (Bilal album)

The article Love for Sale (Bilal album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Love for Sale (Bilal album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Love for Sale (Bilal album)

The article Love for Sale (Bilal album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Love for Sale (Bilal album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Fantano

A RfC has begun at WP:RSN regarding Anthony Fantano's reviews should be count as reliable. Please add your comments there if interested. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alicia (album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Alicia (album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alicia (album)

The article Alicia (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Alicia (album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Alicia (album)

The article Alicia (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alicia (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 21:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FAR notice

I have nominated Enta da Stage for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm _Talk 23:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TBAN update

Hi Isento, I was just informed that my original notification about your Beyonce topic ban contained an error. It stated that the ban was 3 months expiring on 6 March---which is actually only two months after the start. To resolve this, we're going to keep the expiration date I gave and shorten the restriction to 2 months. The interaction bans remain unchanged and are still indefinite. Let me know if you have any questions. — Wug·a·po·des 20:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine Greets!!!

Valentine Greets!!!

Hello Isento, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person.
Sending you a heartfelt and warm love on the eve,
Happy editing,
D💘ggy54321 ^(xoxo😘) 04:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Re: Love for Sale FAC

Hello, no thanks ... I don't do much with content recognition processes. Graham87 06:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 11:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shit Iz Real.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shit Iz Real.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Talk 16:21, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album)

The article Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Album era

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Album era you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Album era

The article Album era you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Album era for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vaticidalprophet -- Vaticidalprophet (talk) 01:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album)

The article Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Live in Tokyo (Charles Tolliver album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all the hard work you have put in to get this article to GA - your efforts are appreciated. DISEman (talk) 09:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That means a lot. Thanks. It was a labor of love. isento (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quote box on So Beautiful or So What

I don't understand your concerns with the quote box when set to a 25em width. This is a perfectly normal width for content (like images, sound sample boxes, quote boxes, etc) that is set next to article prose. You say 25em "renders too slim and difficult to read on mobile view", but I'm not sure if are referring to the quote box being too slim or the article text being too slim. In any case, at a 25em width, the quote box should render nearly identically on all screen sizes and orientations because that's how em-widths work (it's the article content that will have the most variation in width). To try to understand your concerns, I looked at my 25em revision on several devices and orientations:

On my Galaxy Tab A tablet:
- In landscape orientation, the quote box takes up roughly 33% of the page and the text goes across 9 lines.
- In portrait orientation, the quote box takes up roughly 50% of the page and the text goes across the same 9 lines.
On my Galaxy S10 phone:
- In landscape orientation, the quote box takes up roughly 55% of the page and the text goes across 9 lines.
- In portrait orientation, the quote box takes up 100% of the page (since it is standard for hardcoded widths to be ignored in phone portrait layout) and the text goes across 10 lines.
On desktop:
- On my 1920 x 1080 monitor, the quote box takes up 25% of the page and the text goes across 9 lines.

In all cases, a 25em width looks more than fine, and is nearly identical (if not better) in many scenarios to 50% width on tablet and phone. However, the 50% width has the drawback of rendering very poorly on desktop, since it takes up far more space than necessary from the article prose. If you have specific concerns about how the quote box template renders on mobile devices in a specific orientation... well, that would not be unique to the So Beautiful or So What article, and instead should be something to bring up on the template page itself. So, can you elaborate on what your concern is? Y2Kcrazyjoker4 (talk • contributions) 19:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this advice, @Y2kcrazyjoker4:. I've updated the quote boxes in my -- loosely speaking -- own articles. How do they look to you, at Agharta (album) and New York Dolls (album), for instance? isento (talk) 07:33, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:isento/Inspirational verses

I'm sorry to tell you this, but I think you're going to have to delete your "inspirational verses" page. Those lyrics are all copyright violations. Mo Billings (talk) 22:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably ok if you cut them down to one verse or just a few lines. The poems should all be in public domain so they are fine. It's probably easiest to make a new page. The old page needs to be deleted for copyright reasons, though. Blanking is not enough. 00:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mo Billings (talk • contribs)

Okay. I've reduced them and asked an administrator to delete the revision history. isento (talk) 08:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations can't be left hanging around. Since you haven't addressed this, I have asked for the page to be deleted. Mo Billings (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I actually did address this (User_talk:Jo-Jo_Eumerus#Rev_deletion). But thanks for that. isento (talk) 05:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I guess I assumed the history would be deleted not revdeleted and would therefore show up on my watchlist. Mo Billings (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm sorry too. isento (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion for File:Feel Like Makin' Love sample (D'Angelo).ogg

I added PROD tag on File:Feel Like Makin' Love sample (D'Angelo).ogg. If left uncontested for more than seven days, the image will be deleted. Once tag is removed, I won't be able to reinsert the tag. There is WP:FFD. --George Ho (talk) 23:23, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Beatles

Since you made this edit, I thought you should be aware of Talk:The Beatles#Album era undue weight. Sundayclose (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Isento/Inspirational verses

User:Isento/Inspirational verses, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Isento/Inspirational verses and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Isento/Inspirational verses during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mo Billings (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Go Ahead John.ogg

The file File:Go Ahead John.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Usages at Big Fun (Miles Davis album), Jazz fusion, and Miles Davis insufficiently covered by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Petits Machins.ogg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Christgau to Christgau's Record Guide

Hello. Thanks for all your many edits. I love Christgau as well, and have read all of his books, aside from Book Reports. I'm just curious about your decision to change Christgau to, for example, Christgau's Record Guide in the ratings box. I don't particularly care, although, since he only rewrote 25% of the reviews for the book, why not go back to the original Voice columns, if you feel the need to change things? That sounds more snarky that I intend--I'm really just curious. Thanks. Caro7200 (talk) 22:57, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For consistency's sake. All scores in ratings boxes are attributed to publications rather than authors. And sometimes the original Voice column isn't available online, or the ratings box is entirely made up of retrospective reviews, so attributing the book instead would make it consistent with that aspect. isento (talk) 00:49, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the honorable mention stars are novel to the 90s Consumer Guide book. So having that title instead of Christgau's name would give the reader contextual information if they went to the book's article. isento (talk) 04:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death Don't Have No Mercy

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Death Don't Have No Mercy you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death Don't Have No Mercy

The article Death Don't Have No Mercy you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Death Don't Have No Mercy for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Death Don't Have No Mercy

The article Death Don't Have No Mercy you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Death Don't Have No Mercy for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aftermath (Rolling Stones album) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Aftermath (Rolling Stones album) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 15, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 15, 2021, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1000 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so.

For Featured Articles promoted recently, there will be an existing blurb linked from the FAC talk page, which is likely to be transferred to the TFA page by a coordinator at some point.

We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Of Human Feelings scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Of Human Feelings article has been scheduled as today's featured article for April 25, 2021. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 25, 2021... Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jealousy

Am I misreading this edit or did you add a reference from 1906 to a section about gender differences? Mo Billings (talk) 02:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the Confucius quote is definitely earlier than 1906. isento (talk) 05:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are good reasons to cite references that are over 100 years old in psychology or sociology articles, but it should be made clear that they are historical and not modern viewpoints. Your edit did not make that clear at all. Please be careful using these kinds of references or your edits might appear to be deliberately misleading. Thanks. Mo Billings (talk) 23:25, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I wasn't clear. I meant that sources from 1906 would be appropriate in an article about the history of psychology and how views on gender differences have changed over time. Not in a section about modern views on a psychology or sociology subject. Cherry-picking references to support your beliefs is a bad idea. Mo Billings (talk) 17:09, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall saying what my beliefs are. Nor do I recall the section being titled modern views on those subjects... isento (talk) 17:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, stop stalking my activities. isento (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't state that you had any particular beliefs. I was offering some advice about use of sources. You are free to disregard it, but can you try to be about 90% less agressive? Mo Billings (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"...your beliefs..." isento (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure how to answer your question. Math was never my strong suit. isento (talk) 17:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your strong suit? Mo Billings (talk) 17:37, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get back to you on that. isento (talk) 22:54, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chronology discussion - please participate

Hey! I would appreciate it if you participated in the discussion at WT:ALBUMS about chronology links (WT:ALBUMS#Chronology links). I intentionally pinged you as you were the catalyst to the discussion, as your point in a discussion inspired me to open another discussion. If you could add your two cents, that would be great as I'm curious to hear your opinion. Thanks! D🐶ggy54321 ^{(let's chat!)} 00:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsigned comment

Isento. Hi I am nick buck. I was a session player and became a member of the band and recorded on, and toured supporting Double Dose. I ask that you update the page. Also the 1977 timeline should have Bob Steeler and myself as members. Reach me at nick@nickbuck.com Best, Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.107.7.213 (talk) 02:56, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TFA

Thank you today for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album), "about a 1966 album by the Rolling Stones, an artistic breakthrough that advanced the band's musical legacy, a critical and commercial hit that rivalled the Beatles, one of the most critically acclaimed albums in history, a cultural milestone connected to 1960s Swinging London."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

... and today for Of Human Feelings, "about a jazz album by saxophonist Ornette Coleman"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hanging Tree Guitars

Robert Christgau's top-ranked album for 2020. Here's the review:

A dozen solo or near-solo blues, gospel, and blues/gospel recordings dating back as far as 1991 not counting the Glorifying Vine Sisters’ 1977 “Get Ready,” most featuring guitars crafted by North Carolina luthier Freeman Vines that include some from black walnut that had its literal roots in a lynching tree. Not only do all of these distinct Southern Black performers sound like they’ve long since internalized the sounds they make with their stalwart voices and dexterous hands, but from “Slavery Time Blues” to “Amazing Grace” almost all sing of injustice as if it’s been on their minds their entire lives. Harsh or crooning, solo or unison, the music is occasionally embellished with modest piano or driven by drums, but voices and guitars prevail. Try the explicit opener “Slavery Time Blues” or the gospel-sweet lost-love “Clock on the Wall,” a slow and keening “John Henry” or a fare-thee-well “Amazing Grace” so rough-hewn you’ll play it again to make sure that was the song you just heard. And if you're like me you'll also want to read the eloquent as well as beautiful book that complements this perfectly timed project. All these citizens are set on telling the world how much their lives matter.

Here's the album in YouTube-playlist form, since it's obscure as fuck anywhere else. isento (talk) 05:58, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is up with vmavanti

What's wrong with the dude LOL he just commented on my talk page saying I have a lot to learn with dealing with people and that "the words "I want" dont guide the universe". Why does he talk like a supervillain?? It's the personnel section of a wikipedia page bro, get over yourself. Thanks for helping me reach an actual solution/consensus. D1119 (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Who knows, who cares. He's made himself unapproachable, so just treat him that way. isento (talk) 11:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I've been experiencing pretty intense back pain from my scoliosis lately. I don't have nearly the same wherewithal to entertain his bullshit soliloquies as I may have in the past. But there's obviously a host of other editors at that article's talk page (and Martinevans123's talk page), maybe even admins, that can be pinged for assistance and more civil intervention than I can be expected to offer at this point. isento (talk) 13:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Great job on the personnel section at Songs in the Key of Life btw! I've been hoping to expand that article soon with its 33 1/3 Book. isento (talk) 13:24, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks are against the rules here. When did I ever call either of you a "supervillian"?
Vmavanti (talk) 13:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dan, you are going to be kicked off this site. Again.
Vmavanti (talk) 13:47, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is your life really that fucking awful? isento (talk) 18:10, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kids See Ghosts

The article has been nominated for FA for a third time, I thought you would be interested to comment on it since you have got articles to FA status in the past. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 09:44, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll take a look when I have more time later. isento (talk) 13:24, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luv n' Haight sample.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Luv n' Haight sample.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Hog Farm _Talk 22:24, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Vmavanti

Due to his previous misconduct, I added the most of the two-week block that got suspended a couple of months ago back on to this one, so instead of the usual 24 hours he'll sit for ... two weeks.

Just a note, though ... in the future any reports of 3RR violations or any edit warring that you think might warrant administrative attention should be posted at WP:ANEW, not AIV (for all I know that might have been why the first report was removed without comment). Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay, my mistake. And thanks. isento (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gentlemen (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Memphis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hey, How do you do? Thank you for this. I know it is a thing, but what I didn't know was that it's called morality clause. Learned something new today! Thanks. BawinV (talk) 16:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure. Great work on Sour (album)! I actually listened today and enjoyed it. isento (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion of Alicia (album)

Congratulations, Isento! The article you nominated, Alicia (album), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Congratulations in getting Alicia to featured article status. Your quality editing has did it again. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 12:39, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I really appreciate this. isento (talk) 14:34, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Love/Hate (The-Dream album)

The article Love/Hate (The-Dream album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Love/Hate (The-Dream album) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Wetrorave -- Wetrorave (talk) 16:40, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question regarding how to include a documentary reference in an article

Hi there!

So I've been working on Elephant 6 for a couple months now, and something that I haven't gotten around to doing is mentioning the documentary about Elephant 6. Apparently it has a lot of good information about the collective and I'd watch it except right now I don't think it's physically possible for me to watch it. You see, the documentary is only on VHS and you need to schedule a viewing party in one of the major US cities, which I don't live in. Anyway, I'm only trying to get the article to GA so I don't think including info from the documentary is necessary (although it'd probably be necessary for FA), but I'd like to at least mention it's existence, like in a further reading section for books. Should I make a see also further reading section even though it's a documentary? Famous Hobo (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! Do it. There's a citation template available for video sources --> Template:Cite AV media. That'd work. isento (talk) 03:42, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So something like this? Famous Hobo (talk) 16:16, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that looks fine. isento (talk) 00:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agharta (album)

I appreciate that I didn't get the reference links to work properly, can you please help me format them? (And re: "plosin"'s blog, I don't think his educational background invalidates his expertise on this topic... do you disagree?) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.skim (talk • contribs) 15:02 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi. I don't really know what his expertise on Miles Davis is, but for the particular topic you were editing, there already exists the viewpoint you were attributing to Plosin and from a bona fide expert in Paul Tingen at that. I don't see the point in repeating the same thing from a lesser source in a featured article, which is expected to rely on high-quality sources. And I don't see Plosin as high-quality or essential here. isento (talk) 00:10, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please remember to sign all your comments with four tildes at the end, like this: ~~~~ isento (talk) 00:19, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Progressive soul

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Progressive soul you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FeydHuxtable -- FeydHuxtable (talk) 21:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Progressive soul

The article Progressive soul you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Progressive soul for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FeydHuxtable -- FeydHuxtable (talk) 15:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How's it going?

Hi Isento, how have you been? I hope you're well. I stumbled on your inspirational verses page because I used this photo [[1]] in the article I'm working on right now, and I happened to look where else it was used. Coincidentally the Dylan lyric you quoted is actually my all-time favourite of his lyrics too. I think the "I've been meek and hard like an oak" and "everything about you is bringing me misery" verses are my favourite bits but the whole song is wonderful. Cool, take care! Moisejp (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And I love both songs. Great work on that one! isento (talk) 01:47, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your precious links

Sorry, you'll have to keep putting up with reverting, since you refuse (unlike anyone else at WP) to let "singer-songwriter" stand as unlinked. So it remains on the list. It would be simpler just to unlink that one item; then it won't be on the list. Tony (talk) 03:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But what of the notion (as described here by @JG66:) that it is contextually significant enough to be linked? isento (talk) 10:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does seem pretty relevant to what's being discussed at Love for Sale (Bilal album)#Writing and recording ... isento (talk) 10:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tom Hull (critic)

The article Tom Hull (critic) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tom Hull (critic) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Artem.G -- Artem.G (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MBDTF & WTT Edits

My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy: I offered the correct information it’s even within the sales post. Of the 720,000 copies sold in the first week, 496,000 were physical CDs and 224,000 were digital downloads.

Watch the Throne: 757,000 copies sold in the first week, 436,000 were physical CDs and 321,000 were digital downloads.

What’s the difference between what I did and what was done here? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speak_Now#Commercial_performance

The digital sales contributed to the million sold for this album are noted, so why is it not the case for those 2 albums I accurately updated? If this is the case her should say “769,000 copies it’s in first week of release.” Not “1,047,000”. Marikomorose (talk) 18:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The issue with your changes is that they revised a sales figure that had been verified by the citation alongside it, instead replacing it with numbers you still have not explained how you came across. If you read them somewhere reliable, please let me know where and perhaps I can restore your changes along with a citation to the new source. Piotr Jr. (talk) 18:55, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and apologies.

@Piotr Jr: Hey man, I was looking through my contributions history and remembered the stupid edit I made when I added Fantano's score of The Big Day, and then had the fucking nerve to question you about it. As I grow to understand Wikipedia more and more, I realize my mistake and I was way out of line. I know this is late, but thanks for explaining it to me politely. And apologies for initiating the confrontation. Cheers. Mattevt (talk) 04:40, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey buddy. I don't remember this, but I'm glad to hear you've matured as an editor here. Anyway, enjoy the day, and listen to the album! Fantano might've needed some industrial-strength scouring pads to clean out his ears when he reviewed it :p Piotr (talk) 15:00, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback

Hi Piotr Jr., how are you? I know I haven't been very good about reviewing your articles in the past, but since you mentioned you're a fan of this song, I wondered if you might possibly like to give feedback at Wikipedia:Peer review/I'm Goin' Down/archive1. If you don't have time or would rather not, no worries! Thanks, take it easy. Moisejp (talk) 04:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Declaration

I love Polish disco music 🎶 🎵 😍 😌 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h-5tRoEU5k8 Piotr Jr. (talk) 06:28, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:REFUND question

Hello, Piotr Jr.,

I saw all of your requests at WP:REFUND and I have to ask, why did you request all of these User space pages to be deleted a few weeks ago, only to ask for them to be restored now? This seems like a waste of effort on admin's part, both to delete these pages and now to restore them all, and no one wants to restore all of these pages if you will request that they be deleted again in the near future. Are you sure that you want these pages now? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:55, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crisis of conscience. But, yep, restore. Piotr Jr. (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz:, I should add that I'm ignorant of what effort and process it takes to restore the pages, but given this warning, I'll be more mindful going forward. Thanks. 🙏 Piotr Jr. (talk) 03:29, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tumbling Dice PR

Hi Piotr Jr., I was wondering if you may be able to take a look at Wikipedia:Peer review/Tumbling Dice/archive4 and offer any feedback? I'd love to take "Tumbling Dice" to FA soon. If not, no worries. Thank you for your time. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 02:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm drunk right now. Looks like a great article though, on its way ... Piotr Jr. (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]