User talk:Glacialfox

Hi there, thanks a lot for your help! I'll just wait for the article to be reviewed again then. Good luck with your work and best regards, Tartesauxpommes (talk) 09:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Steeden; Rod Reddy; Fuyang, Zhejiang; Miniature Golf Courses of America; Count Your Blessings (Bring Me the Horizon album); Shirley Temple Bar; Diego Chará; List song; Leanor Ortega; Crunkcore; Keith Hoerig; John Armstrong (rugby league); Croix-des-Bouquets Arrondissement; Brace Yourself for the Mediocre; Noel Goldthorpe; Andrew Verdecchio; Leevan Sands; Peggy Charren; Adelaide First Grade Premiership

Cleanup: Australian Rugby League; We Do What We Want; United States Army Reserve
Merge: Dow Jones Global Titans 50; Alexandria County, D.C.; List of radio formats
Add Sources: Phocomelia; Firefly (TV series); Gros-Morne Arrondissement
Wikify: Subharmonic mixer; Professional courtesy; Braniff Flight 352
Expand: Wikimedia Foundation; Missouri Headwaters State Park; Lieutenant Governor of Colorado

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Hello Glacialfox, a very warm welcome to the Guild of Copy Editors. We are pleased to have you join us!

To start, you may want to copy edit an article from our Requests page, or pick one from our backlog. If you need any assistance, feel free to leave a note on our talk page, or you can contact any of our coordinators. If you are new to copy editing, you may want to join our Mentorship program. You may also want to participate in our Backlog elimination drives. Below, you will find list of useful links for your convenience.

Thanks again for joining the Guild, and do make yourself at home.

– Your GOCE coordinators: Diannaa ^(Talk), Chaosdruid (talk), The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs and Slon02

I'd be happy to mentor you. Can we start tomorrow? The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 02:33, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good. :D Where to start? Maybe I could try an article and you could give me feedback? I dunno. :P

That's what I did with my first mentee, and I suppose that could work with you, as well. So let's start there. The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 02:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to choose any article with a {{copy edit}} tag and copy edit it. Let me know when you're done so I can take a look at it. The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 22:55, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried this one. :3 I'm a bit concerned about that "coincidentally" in the article, cause it doesn't seem like a coincidence to me. O__o I tried not to go overboard on the commas even though there were many places I wanted to use them, apparently I use too many. :P Glacialfox (talk) 00:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay, something came up that I had to take care of. It looks like you did some reformatting as well as copy editing, but you missed a couple things. See here and here for my copy edits. There were a few issues with commas, tone, and capitalization, as you can tell. But you did do a good first job. I'll plan a lesson for you and let you know when it's ready. Regards, The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 21:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Glacialfox, I've been working on a lesson for you, but I need another sample of your copy editing. Could you choose another article tagged with the copy edit tag and copy edit it for me? Thanks, The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 03:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently trying to decide whether I should do this or if it would be best to just stick with fixing typos, what do you think? :P Glacialfox (talk) 22:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided I am going to stick with copyediting, I'll try another one within a few days. :) Glacialfox (talk) 23:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think you could choose an article for me? xP Glacialfox (talk) 03:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How about Do Something? The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 23:14, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well, this should take a while. :P i'm starting it now Glacialfox (talk) 23:05, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is rather hard, copyediting must be a tough life haha. is there a way you can mark it as that it's currently being copy edited so that you can save what you currently have and continue at another time Glacialfox (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Adding the {{GOCEinuse}} tag shows that you're working on the article. The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 15:34, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Glacialfox, I was wondering how your copy editing is coming? The Utahraptor ^Talk/_Contribs 14:32, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oh woops, i totally forgot to finish it. it's going meh :P Glacialfox (talk) 14:34, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Attack Cat, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Hallows AG (talk) 13:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

???

What do you have against making Gaetjens's name easier to pronounce? howcheng {chat} 17:29, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, just his bad luck to have "gay" in his name. howcheng {chat} 17:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

For your campaign to remove misspellings (such as "delcaring" = "declaring" from Wikipedia. Edison (talk) 18:44, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sepp Blatter

I'd like to invite you to a discussion regarding Sepp Blatter, please see the talk page. Regards IJA (talk) 14:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your question

Hello Glacialfox, I see that you asked me a question on November 9th. I apologize, I just now noticed the question. There are three ways to revert to a non-vandalized revision when there are multiple vandalism edits in succession. If the edits are all by the same editor, you can use rollback to revert all of the editor's consecutive changes. If there are several vandalism revisions from several users, there are other reversal methods. The easiest way is to use twinkle's "Restore this revision" button that appears when you click on a Diff. To manually revert a group of consecutive vandalism edits, click on the history tab. On the history tab, there is a timestamp for each revision. Click on the latest timestamp prior to the vandalism edits. When you click on the timestamp, it will bring up that version of the article. Now, click on the "edit" button. A warning should appear at the top of the edit window with this message:

“

You are editing an old revision of this page. If you save it, any changes made since then will be removed

”

If you click the save button, it will revert all changes made after that revision. To answer the second part of your question, if a single editor keeps vandalizing an article, you can report them to Administrator intervention against vandalism after you have warned them four times. If the article is vandalized by multiple editors continuously, you can request the article be semi-protected by filing a request at Request for page protection. I hope that answers your question. Best wishes, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 18:17, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:R

Hello, Glacialfox. You have new messages at Arjayay's talk page.
Message added 13:05, 26 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Changing quoted text

Hi. I've reverted your recent edit to Liberties Act 1850. The word you changed was part of a blockquote, and changes of this sort should only be made with care (especially when dealing with older source texts), such as when the source text has been inaccurately reproduced, or if it perhaps contains a blatant typographical error (such as "teh" for "the"). In this case, the source text clearly uses "unfrequently"; while not a common word, it is nevertheless listed in the OED, and appears twice in the same paragraph in the source text (which admittedly wasn't obvious due to errors in the blockquote). Cheers, Andrew Gwilliam (talk) 23:43, 29 November 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Oh whoops, I was totally being really careful to not change quotes too haha. I've just been going through the lists of common misspellings letter by letter and fixing things and that was on it. :P Thank you for telling me. :3 Glacialfox (talk)

"Unfortunately"

It's all well and good correcting a misspelling of the word, but the chances are that when this word appears in articles, it's in a point-of-view statement. - Dudesleeper talk 01:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes sense. I forgot about the whole point of view thing so thanks for reminding me. :P Glacialfox (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your application for AWB

Please consider using Special:Preferences to enable your Wikipedia email. If so, admins will consider your AWB application further. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think I have done it now? Glacialfox (talk) 23:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I see you have only been active on Wikipedia for one month. Let me reflect a bit before I give you an answer. When using AWB it helps to have a bit of experience. EdJohnston (talk) 04:25, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've been approved for AWB. If you have any questions about it, Alpha Quadrant is willing to assist you. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 22:24, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Glacialfox. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 04:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TB

Hello, Glacialfox. You have new messages at Achowat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Warning vandals on Zooey Deschanel

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Zooey Deschanel: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. --AW (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you, I didn't know that page existed. :D Glacialfox (talk) 19:02, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Glacialfox. You have new messages at Alpha Quadrant's talk page.
Message added 22:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:50, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello. You have a new message at Djathinkimacowboy's talk page.

Josh Braithwaite

I reverted to the last version by Josh Braithwaite himself. Under the circumstances that seemed the safest thing to do. Thanks for calling my attention to this: using Huggle it is far too easy to revert the latest change and not realise there are other problematic edits too. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

help

im trying to FIX a vandalism by deleting it (on the Justin Pereira page). please help me keep one person from reverting to the same vandalism over and over.

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	You beat me to more than enough Vandalism to warrant this Achowat (talk) 18:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

aaah my first barnstar this made my day thank you very much. ;__; <3 Glacialfox (talk) 18:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:

Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
You can display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:23, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About barnstars:

Glacialfox, not to sound like a barnstar fisher: I think it might be cool if you designed a star and proposed it for the purpose you were thinking. I do not expect to see a barnstar; only, this is too good an issue not to be raised and if you do, you must also propose what the star should look like. I did it with the Quasar Barnstar. If I am not mistaken, you can propose it here[1]. Anyway, best of luck and in fact, let me take this opportunity to beg you not to try to award me a barnstar at all. Djathinkimacowboy 16:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a good idea, I'll start figuring out what to call it. :P By the way, what does Quasar mean? Glacialfox (talk) 16:59, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well I proposed that it be for editors who assist other editors in sailing Wikiwaters. Any editor who clarifies and explains rules, or improves the rules themselves at the proper forum to do so. If you think about it, anyone who assists, cleans up, does nice things, excellent editing, nearly infinite reasons to award it. Glad you like it, another fine editor designed it for me. Djathinkimacowboy 20:51, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry...a quasar is an intense swirl of gaseous energy, perhaps being pulled into a black hole and is found in galaxy centres. Its light outshines all light. When you think about it, it's a sort of Gothic-Romantic denizen of the universe. ;) Djathinkimacowboy 20:54, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just looked at your main page. You have autism? So do I! Asperger. (But I also have an astronomical I.Q.) Djathinkimacowboy 20:57, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's awesome. :D I'm guessing that's probably why we both ended up on wikipedia haha. Glacialfox (talk) 03:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have a query: do you know user CeilingCrash? That user left a weird and somewhat inappropriate message to me at my talk, claiming I edit the Asperger article and making insulting remarks about Wikipedia editors. I do not recognise that user, I have never been near or even seen the AS artilce or its talk page. Do you know about this at all by chance? Or know the editor? I am just trying to discover why he sent me what looks like a message for someone else. Djathinkimacowboy 04:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the above: I struck it because I did comment on the talk page at the Asperger syndrome article and got some snotty replies there. Only I pay no attention to that article or talk page. It was confusing to get a comment so long after I went there. I went back, looked and I saw that those editors are not very friendly. I see why CeilingCrash dislikes that place. Djathinkimacowboy 05:03, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked just now and I don't understand what the heck is going on there haha Glacialfox (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you see my talk page, you'll see Ceiling was just trying to tell me it's useless to waste time at the article. Too many hot-heads trying to own the thing. Checked out the article and I frankly don't care what they're doing there. I have developed the philosophy of walking away from silly arguments. Djathinkimacowboy 22:42, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A privilege ...

		The Quasar Barnstar
		From what I have seen in your history: for the valour, persistence and tireless destruction of vandalism and erroneous edits. This is one of the best teachers of how things ought to be done on Wikipedia. Keep up the great work. Djathinkimacowboy 16:29, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This totally made me tear up. xD Glacialfox (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Hey! You keep beating me at reversions! Congrats! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 04:38, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hello, you recently reverted an edit I made to Outline of James Bond. I believe that this revert was made in error, as the edit I made (I believe) was constructive. I would like to reinstate my edit, but I wanted to give you the courtesy of running it past you first. Thank you for your time, 67.180.192.222 (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my bad. I've put the edit back and removed the warning from your page. :) Thanks for bringing it to my attention so I could remove that warning thing that was put there, I would hate for you to have one on your page and give people the wrong idea about you haha. :P Glacialfox (talk) 02:26, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you. Glad we could get this cleared up so easily. 67.180.192.222 (talk) 02:50, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah=

"Revert edit by whitelisted..." Yeah yeah, whatever, just do it already It's funny, I usually don't ignore prompts, but I guess I was feeling a little rammy...

GOCE newsletter

Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors

Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today.

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:43, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Be careful!

Scripts make things faster and all, but you should be more careful with that mouse. Lucasoutloud (talk) 00:58, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i blame igloo for not warning me that someone had changed it, that rascal! but yeah, I know. :P Glacialfox (talk) 01:03, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed this thread when I saw the "hot sexy" IP's comment. Regarding I blame igloo - I hate to be nit picky but when you use tools, you have to accept 100 percent responsibility for your edits. If igloo, AWB etc has some kind of glitch or whatever, it's your responsibility to be that much more careful. I notice you have like two years worth of editing in eight weeks. You're not in a race so take your time and enjoy yourself. My best wishes for a happy 2012. Slight Smile 04:27, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The blaming igloo thing was a joke. :P You too. :3 Glacialfox (talk) 11:19, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you!

The Purple Barnstar

For all the attacks you have endured. I particularily enjoyed looking at this page. I shall also give you this Userbox which you may like to use.

vn-17

This user talk page has been vandalized 17 times.

. Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 10:26, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wahey! :D Yes, that one is quite a beaut, and sweet userbox man. :P My favourite is probably when some guy did this to a random article :P Glacialfox (talk) 15:17, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do they even bother? Though, I'm still waiting for the day that vandals hit me, and It should be sooner now that I'm using Igloo. Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 15:18, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Glacialfox. You have new messages at User talk:Ale jrb/Scripts/igloo.
Message added 18:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

pluma♫ ♯ 18:33, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I see your name a lot when I'm fighting vandalism. Thanks a lot for helping keep Wikipedia free of vandalism! -- Sailing to Byzantium _(msg), 04:22, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, you're doing a fabulous job yourself as well. :3 Glacialfox (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Harnad

I do not understand what are you trying to tell me here:

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John Harnad, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed.

What was not constructive and what is it that makes you to talk about constructivity? This is the full text of prof. Harnad's opinion about Wikipedia, as presented by prof. Hewitt

Wikipedia, on the contrary, is the enshrinement of contempt for learning, knowledge and expertise. It is, for many, a diversionary hobby to which they are prepared to devote a great portion of their time, as others do to computer based video games. Unfortunately, it has led also to an inner cult, shrouded in anonymity, with structures and processes of self-regulation that are woefully inadequate. Many of these tools and procedures are reminiscent, in parody, of those of the Inquisition: secret courts, an inner “elite” arbitrarily empowered to censor and exclude all those perceived as a threat to the adopted conventions of the cult; denunciations, character assassination, excommunication. An arbitrarily concocted “rulebook” and language rife with self-referential sanctimoniousness give a superficial illusion of order and good sense, but no such thing exists in practice. It is truly a “Tyranny of the Ignorant”.

So, what is your academic background that makes you to pass your judgement here?--71.163.236.199 (talk) 00:09, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to admit right now that I'm not the best to have this discussion with, I suggest you discuss this on the article talk page or with one of the other editors that reverted your edit, especially since I don't want you or anyone else to end up blocked for edit warring or something. (also, the warning thingy is a template, I didn't choose the words for it myself :P) Glacialfox (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Levels

Hi!

I didn't realise that anyone was still using it, so I was just doing a bit of tidying up.

You can add the vandalism levels to your own userpage, just simply add {{Vandalism information}} anywhere on any page and you will get the same box. Alternatively, if you look at Template:Vandalism information, you can see in the documentation that there are quite a few variations that you can try out - go to Template_talk:Vandalism_information#Available_styles and hit show to see all the different ones.

Hope this helps!

The Helpful One 01:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, a little Christmas joke it seems, duly removed. :) The Helpful One 02:00, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh thank you! That Zalgo looks like an interesting fellow. :P Glacialfox (talk) 04:14, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report

We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.

Highlights

Membership grows to 764 editors, an increase of 261
Report on coordinators' elections
Around 1,000 articles removed through six Backlog elimination drives
Guild Plans for 2012
Requests page report
Sign up for the January 2012 Backlog elimination drive!

Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012!
– Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus).

Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:18, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

GLOO

What the hell was that? — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 18:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not quite sure, but it looks like somewhere along the way I decided to fail :P Glacialfox (talk) 18:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see what happened. Igloo saw the top part of the edit (adding in whitespace and modifying the section (so that it wasn't one). Normally an edit like that would be vandalism, and so Igloo flagged it red, which Glacialfox would have seen and reverted with one click. Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 08:29, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Don't editors actually see the edits they revert? User edited his own talk page and happened to make a small mistake, he didn't deserve a huge vandalism warning for that. Please take the time to leave a small note to him. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:13, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With Igloo, you do see the changes, however if it is 'red' (the edit is in red in the list of recent changes), then it is considered vandalism. Because of the way the edit was, Glacialfox would have seen the mistake at the top, but not the legitimate content added. When choosing a diff to look at, all a user sees is the page name and Igloo's rating of it (red=probable vandalism, green=good edit, white=unsure). Often when using Igloo, users will automatically revert red edits, since Igloo is usually right. Besides, the problem has been rectified, and I'm sure that when he's next online, Glacialfox will happily apologise. Sincerely, Akjar13 (He's Gone Mental) 16:27, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Does the GLOO thing work with rollback? I'd like to test it but I don't have any superpowers. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 16:45, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't mean to. :c And I went to get rid of the warning after I found out I made a mistake but it was already gone. Is the "Please take the time to leave a small note to him" directed at me? Glacialfox (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. He removed the warning but may still think you're a jerk. (Well, probably not, he seems like a nice guy, but still.) (I didn't mean to make a big deal of this, sorry for the huge thread here.) — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 17:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Will do then. :3 And don't worry about it, haha. Glacialfox (talk) 18:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would you happen to know why Thehistorian10 reverted my message? :P Glacialfox (talk) 23:25, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently I was mistaken when I thought he's a relatively nice guy and deserved an explanation. Sorry about that. :x — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 02:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your quick revert of CBNGs talk page! Many thanks, on behalf of the ClueBot Admins - `Rich(MTCD)`^T\|C\|E-Mail 00:08, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks you to. Your far quicker than me. Edinburgh Wanderer 00:28, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

Hello, Glacialfox. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Your assistance please

Would you mind contributing a comment here[2]? Please feel free to address any concern at my talk page. Thanks. Also Glacial, would you look at the Asperger Syndrome talk? There is an IP who I believe is personally attacking people on the AS/autism spectrum. People need to speak up about that!--Djathinkimacowboy ^BUCKSHOT 12:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I realized you might think I ignored your message cause I never did anything, but really I looked at them both yesterday morning and they seemed to have already been dealt with, was I correct? Glacialfox (talk) 19:02, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for the revert of the vandalism on my userpage. :P -down load ׀ talk 18:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :D Glacialfox (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

.es domain name

Thanks for your informative and timely message regarding the modifications I made to the .es domain name entry. I would argue that my edit was indeed constructive and would provide a more beneficial user experience to those encountering this article. This is due to the fact that the final example given isn't even really a website, and the domain name I replaced it with (ilovecooki.es) is a far more pleasing and clever domain hack. Thank you again, and good day. 65.96.125.17 (talk) 23:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]