Jump to content

User talk:Cirt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ankitbhatt (talk | contribs) at 15:40, 5 May 2013 (→‎English Wikipedia readership survey 2013). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject Good Articles: Open Tasks
This project identifies, organizes and improves good articles on Wikipedia.
AFD/TT-7T-8T-2RelistedAFDOWP:DELSORT: Sexuality and gender, Law, InternetAFD tool linksWP:DRVWP:MFDAIVRFUBUAA/CATRFPPPERCSDABFARFAC urgentsTFARRSNBLPNFTNGAN Topic lists • Article alerts: Freedom of speechHuman rightsJournalismSexology and sexualityLGBT studiesFeminismLawInternetInternet cultureComedyU.S. Supreme Court cases
Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)

Freedom of speech = New WikiProject

I've recently gone ahead and created WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech. If you're interested, here are some easy things you can do:

  1. List yourself as a participant in the WikiProject, by adding your username here: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Freedom_of_speech#Participants.
  2. Add userbox {{User Freedom of speech}} to your userpage, which lists you as a member of the WikiProject.
  3. Tag relevant talk pages of articles and other relevant pages using {{WikiProject Freedom of speech}}.
  4. Join in discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Freedom of speech.
  5. Notify others you think might be interested in Freedom of speech to join the WikiProject.

Thank you for your interest in Freedom of speech, — Cirt (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Technology selected articles

Hey there. I'm still spending most of my time on Wikidata and doing RL work (Wikidata is in a... how do I describe it... critical transition period), but I finally got around to finding some older technology FAs for you, to try to even out the timing.

I should, theoretically, have a few days at the beginning of March and a few days at the end of April, if we're still working on this then. Other than that, I'm really tied up until May. Sorry. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:50, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These are really great suggestions, I'll get to adding some of them. Thank you! :) — Cirt (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List Peer Review for Dan Savage bibliography

List Peer Review for Dan Savage bibliography

Please see discussion, at Wikipedia:Peer review/Dan Savage bibliography/archive2. — Cirt (talk) 00:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Portal work

Hi there,

Thanks for the review on Insurrection btw, I noticed that you've done a great deal of portal work and one of the things I'm hoping to do is improved Portal:Star Trek to featured status. However, I've never done any portal based-work before, and right now I'm concentrating on getting the number of DYK hooks up to 50 (for ten sets of five) and then the next step will be to overhaul the selected articles as they're pretty random right now as the vast majority of the Good Articles in the project are mine and have only been created in the last six months or so.

Once I get properly started on the re-design (which I'm going to aim to do as a mock up in userspace rather than risk breaking the existing templates!), is it OK if I occasionally bug you with portal related questions? My immediate thoughts for layout is to completely drop recommended articles, move the WikiProjects to a wider box down by related portals, and then try to balance the size of the other sections so that they don't just mess up the layout quite so much (right now on my screen at least, there is a big gap about halfway down on the left side created by the size of the sections on the right side). I was thinking that Portal:The Simpsons was probably a good example of what to base the layout on, taking into account the size of each box etc as the ones on the ST portal seem to be rather large right now. Any pointers would be greatly appreciated! :) Miyagawa (talk) 09:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That would be amazing if you could do that. I'd effectively be putting it together through trial and error and so I'd be much happier with someone who knows what they're doing taking the lead! :) Miyagawa (talk) 18:05, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Milhist FA, A-Class and Peer Reviews January–March 2013

Military history service award
By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your good contributions to the WikiProject's Peer, A-Class and Featured Article reviews for the period January–March 2013, I am delighted to award you the Military history WikiProject award. Anotherclown (talk) 23:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate - FA nomination

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate is currently a candidate for consideration of Featured Article quality status. The discussion page is at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Freedom for the Thought That We Hate/archive1.

Thank you for your time, — Cirt (talk) 04:46, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Good Article Barnstar
For your contributions to bring Fuck (film) to Good Fuckin' Article (GFA) status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 05:18, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much! :) — Cirt (talk) 05:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Cirt. You have new messages at VoxelBot's talk page.
Message added 03:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Vacation9 03:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks for the notice! :) — Cirt (talk) 06:30, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

English Wikipedia readership survey 2013

Hi. I was wondering if you have any thoughts about English Wikipedia readership survey 2013. --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 10:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, will try and find some time to look it over. :) — Cirt (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

Hi. I've put up Ra.One for an FAC, but it's seen little activity for some time. Could you take a look at it, and put up your thoughts? I'd like to get working on the article once more. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]