Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 46.200.26.232 (talk) at 20:02, 20 July 2016 (→‎User-reported). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 08:55 on 1 July 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.



    Reports

    Bot-reported

    User-reported

    User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. User has received no warnings. SpencerT♦C 17:21, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok. But I don't know how to warning an IP address, only users.--88marcus (talk) 17:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    @88marcus: The same way you warn users. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:57, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    (Non-administrator comment) This IP is likely a block evasion of some sort, can't pinpoint the exact user though... 172.58.40.117 (talk) 18:35, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    You can not continously revert to an incorrect name directly agianst page title just to keep a single part up to date. There is a timestamp at that section so better to have that outdated than inserting errors all over the article. Clear vandalism done on purpose. Qed237 (talk) 19:45, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Team name is not relevant for your wrong edits. You restored the very old version of the squad section. Also the city was renamed to Kamianske two months ago. Article was named Kamianske correctly for nearly two months before you moved it back yesterday without any reason. 46.200.26.232 (talk) 20:02, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Will actively monitor user. BethNaught (talk) 19:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]