User talk:Kintetsubuffalo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 125.214.51.223 (talk) at 08:36, 20 August 2018 (→‎Re: Dirty War in Argentina). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

It is approximately 12:39 AM where this user lives.

Current time in Japan: 00:39, May 30, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)

Welcome to my talk page.
House Rules
  1. I may or may not respond to a post you make here on this page, I will try to respond, but if I don't, you will survive, I'm sure.
  2. If I revert or remove your post from my page, it could be that I do not find the discussion germane to me; alternately it could be that I find something in the posting to be preachy or pedantic, in which case I will simply revert or remove your post. I am busy living in Japan, and really don't need to be roasted. Whiny, self-important editors threaten with "I'll get your x taken away" or "you'll never make admin"... I couldn't care less. It's happened, and I am still here.
  3. This is not your talk page, this is my talk page, and I do not allow edit wars on here. If you are a legal positivist, if the "rules" of Wikipedia in your mind overrule respect for the privacy and pages of others, or if you are a creepy Wikistalking troll, you have your own talkpage which is your own playground to do exactly what you wish. This is not it, and you are not welcome to it.
  4. If you template me for something you should be discussing first, especially if you are an edit-warring copyright cockroach, don't be surprised if I cuss you. You've earned it.
  5. Complaint against me? Be patient, my perennial wikistalker is sure to get in touch with you soon and apologize for my ill behavior. It would be funny if it were not pathetic.
  6. Friends and colleagues are most welcome, and none of the above is meant for you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Associação dos Escuteiros de Cabo Verde.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Associação dos Escuteiros de Cabo Verde.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your email

I am not able to check my email, but I believe you were asking for help moving a file at commons. to move files at commons you should follow the instructions at commons. Frietjes (talk) 14:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab

Your request(s) has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, and here so we may close them. - FOX 52 (talk) 04:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on List of Scouting memorials

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://www.rogerknapp.com/download/JapanMonumentforBoyScout.htm. The translation of the plaque is copyright, and the plaque itself is as well, unless the author has been dead for 50 years. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

State Seal of Japan

Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close them. Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 20:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FOX 52 I got your completion notice-they are not the same-note the upper left kanji.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 01:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kintetsubuffalo: try this file - FOX 52 (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bronze Wolf Award

upper is a png and lower is a svg. But is this good enough? --Egel Reaction? 19:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Egel: Perfect, exactly what I had in mind! Can you upload it here? Thanks!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ᐁT₳LKᐃ 16:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Manchukuo Boy Scouts

I've found this Facebook page about Manchukuo's Boy Scouts. I read they existed but I can't any pictures of them until now.

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.1413380498965702.1073741837.1413112325659186&type=3

If I could find more about them, I may inform you about this.

--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome!

--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just by luck!

--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 01:52, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. Maybe I've read your page a long time ago, but I forgot it. Then I found out about the tidbit about Manchukuo and remembered your userpage.

--Kyuzoaoi (talk) 04:04, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Manchukuo Boy Scouts

Sure man. What do you need me to do?--Šolon (talk) 00:23, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok. Where is your article?--Šolon (talk) 21:33, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • The top half of the round one says "大满洲帝国童子军联盟" (The Boy Scouts Alliance of the Empire of Great Manchuria). Bottom half says "智、勇、仁"(Wisdom, Brave, Benevolence).--Šolon (talk) 23:47, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • 1st picture to the right say "吉林省童子团指导者" (Director/Commander of Boy Scouts Group/Regiment of Jilin Provice), title to the left is that of Hsinking Special Municipality(新京特别市童子团指导者).
        • For the 2nd picture its ok. I had elementary Japanese when I was a freshman and I can read Kanji anyways. It says the flag ceremony of Boy Scout's establishment will be held in May 7th, 1935（康德二年五月七日） in front of the square of the Imperial Household Agency (宫内府). Representatives all over the nation will attend the event... You can ask Japanese Wikipedian for more accurate translation, but I am sure thats pretty much it.
          • 3rd pic, Boy scouts marching in the city
            • 4th, from right to left: Oath (誓词), regulation (or rules) (规律) , Slogan (标语)。
              • 5th, The organizational schemes/outlines/summary of Manchukuo Boy Scouts (满洲国童子军组织纲要)
                • 6th, that's what I don't know at this moment. I can ask someone else for you. I am guessing this is the Imperial Household Agency (宫内府) they talked about in picture 2, but not for sure.
                  • 7th, It says "日满童子军交X", having difficulty to read the last character (x). Watermark messed it up. It seems to mean "The exchange duty between Japanese and Manchukuo boy scouts". "康德元年五月六日" is May 6th, 1934.
                    • 8th, last picture, yes. I would translate group as regiment, but not a big deal.--Šolon (talk) 16:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can translate it myself, but that wouldn't be a reliable source. I will see if I can find anything in Manchu during that period, but I highly doubt it since Manchu wasn't the official language of Manchukuo.
    • Sorry, been busy today. I'll probably look it over this weekend. For the first and third link, are you trying to get those books or just use those pages as reference?--Šolon (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      • Sorry has been really really busy recently. Link [1] directs you to the website of Dalian Library. It is only good if you can get the book, or its just an short introduction. Link [2] is an article from a news website, so it is an ok source. The other two links are not reliable sources. Especially [3], it is just a PDF version of Manchukuo on Chinese Wikipedia.--Šolon (talk) 13:25, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
        • Nothing much valuable after I actually read through the article. It only mentioned the scout once as quoted: “协和青少年团训练对象为16岁以上至25岁，把伪满洲国童子团联盟（1932年9月成立）、满铁爱路少年队（1936年6月成立）等合并而成。” meaning: Xiehe Youth Group from 16 to 25 years old is the combination of Manchukuo Scout alliance (est. Sep 1932) and the organization of Manchu railroad youth (est. Jun 1936). --Šolon (talk) 01:48, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab

Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close it. - FOX 52 (talk) 16:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

re: next question

This is a huge topic but long story short, basically couple of reasons:

  • 1. Population. This is a common minority issue.
  • 2. Desegregation of Manchus and Chinese. This happened at the end of Qing. Imagine as an minority without a community and all of your neighboorhood were Chinese.
  • 3. Fall of Qing. Manchu government somehow had a control of Manchu education until the end, but when the dynasty collapsed, the force which regulated language education was gone as well (and the succeeding ROC government had an anti-Manchu sentiment btw).


Luckily, it is 21st century. We now have the Internet which gave us many volunteers a platform to regain our language. You will also see more native speakers in the next couple of generations since Manchu education was established at school by the Chinese government as they began to see Manchu language as a cultural heritage. However, it'll never be completely revived like it used to be, but it won't be completely dead just like Gaelic.--Šolon (talk) 23:56, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Scouting in Taiwan

Hello and thanks for your invitation and discussion. We have established a community about the Taiwan's WikiProject Scouting and have a Facebook Fan Page and a Facebook group (both of these account name are @wikiscoutingtw). We are welcome to join us and feel free to discuss; you can use English to talk and we can understand. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 14:18, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music#Sub-project EDM as a participant of WP:WikiProject Electronic music. - TheMagnificentist 13:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World Scout Jamboree / World Scout Moot

@--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) Hello. Thanks for the comments. Where is the error? All edited data had its source. I've also updated table settings to make them readable to readers. As far as flags and table settings are concerned - I was drawing on how the site about the Olympic Games is modified. (Https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Olympic_Games_host_cities). Please accept my changes. They are correct and substantive. Thank you. --* User:Agi~cswiki

@Agi~cswiki:
  1. per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Icons#Inappropriate use, which was cited in my edit summary, the flags should not be added-the Scouting WikiProject frequently has to remove them from articles
  2. it is bad form to remove existing sources in favor of your own. If your sources are good, add them, but don't remove the old sources
  3. it is bad form to rewrite large sections of existing articles-your text should fit in to the existing text, not overwrite it
That said, I believe you are a dedicated Scouter, and your hard work is appreciated, if you will work with those editors who have been working on these articles for years, and not against them--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:56, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Scouts in South Africa

Hi, you can find some details of the four associations in these documents (I don't have personal recollections to add as this was 1970s and earlier):

Here is a reference to Winston that you could possibly use:

Zaian (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger protocol

I notice that you're working on a merge in Key (lock). I've managed to avoid working on merges so I start by thanking anyone willing to take on that task. However, merges typically include the copying of material from an existing article, and WP:COPYWITHIN has what I view as best practices for this activity, specifically noting that the edit summary should explain the article content was copied and have a link to the source page. At the moment, I get that readers could figure it out by seeing the template on the page but presumably that template will go away when you think the merger is completed and there will be no clear record of where the material came from and in particular, and of course the key point (notice how I cleverly invoked the word "key") is that attribution history is lost without the edit summary noting the source of the material.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:53, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sphilbrick:Sorry, I'm missing it-what did I do that I shouldn't? It's late, rough day and my head is not clear.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:19, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand your edit summary you are working on a merge of some material into Key (lock). Based on the template on the article I assume the material came from Maison key system (which no longer exists). For attribution reasons, the advice on copping materials within Wikipedia suggest specifically identifying in the edit summary that you have copied material and providing a link to the original article. I'm not quite sure where the original article is so that might be a little work but it helps preserve the attribution history of those who contributed to the original material.
Sorry, I know I'm catching you at the end of a long day.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:14, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Just dropping by to say hi to fellow Wikipedia in Japan! Regards, Alex ShihTalk 04:54, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring, as you did at Couscous. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Rami R 09:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I'm okay with it, every so often it's good for the soul. I would request that someone (you, if you're an honest admin) actually look at the edits on their merits. I reverted an agenda-pusher, and am curious to know why I got more time penalty than the agenda-pushing newbie user. Either way it's a nice break for me.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad you are enjoying your break. This edit is the reason you got slightly longer. Simply put, you should have known better than calling someone "noob". Your decorum afterwards wasn't any better either. Rami R 10:03, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Rami R Stylequick is at it again, writing horribly-capitalized, misspelled, Algerian-POV-pushing-at-the-expense-of-their-neighbors, previous-cite-removing blunders. I've done one revert or cleanup of each, then I'm not touching them, but you should really have a look.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:44, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Thank you for your actions and recognition of my efforts. Do you know which administrator I should request to have these pages disabled from IPs and new editors? Meaning who should I request for semi-protection of these pages from newcomers and IPs who keep making disruptive edits. Let me know if anyone is advisable to consult. Best regards.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 03:12, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NadirAli:Your best bet is Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, also given his recent mudslinging, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations may be in order.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:16, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Given this users recent comments and suspected switching to IP editing, I don't think it's a bad idea at all. Problem is I got an exam on Sunday for my lifeguard course and homework to do. When I open an SPI later, would you be willing to leave a comment? I'll start off with an RFPP hopefully tonight and move to an SPI later on. I suspect this is the same IP based on the general area that edit warred me and I reported, but CU misinterpreted request.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 03:22, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to support.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:31, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have filed a request over here. Just keep an lookout over there for now. We'll move to the SPI in a couple of days. Thank you for your advice and support.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 05:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@NadirAli:, he's back and it's clear he's a sock, even IPs are reverting him. Wikipedia:CheckUser#Contacting_a_CheckUser is a good bet,--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Kintetsubaffalo, I will file a formal SPI hopefully tomorrow as I more time to gather evidence. I will send you the link to the case page once I opened it.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 04:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was opening a sockpuppet investigation page and looking through this users contributions to find the diff of him pinging a user for help as the IP was in edit summaries and talk pages. It looks like CU already blocked him before I could file the SPI. I am sure he's the same IP sock that edit warred me and another user last month. When I opened another SPI against the IP, I did it with the concern that this is a banned user based on his comments. The CU misunderstood my comments and closed the case page. Have a look when you can and tell me if it appears to be him. I am quite sure it is. We still have one unblocked IP user. Regards.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 00:34, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I believe we found the sockmaster, so I have tagged it.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 02:47, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

White Mischief

Thanks for this edit adding a "tone" tag to the article. Please could you make some suggestions on Talk:White_Mischief_(film) about how the article could be improved? --Northernhenge (talk) 21:52, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Christiaan Barnard

Were you able to take a look at the source? I'm still concerned that the paraphrasing may have broader problems. Samsara 09:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samsara:I live in Japan so no access to a lending library, but the whole thing reeks POV.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Samsara A google search only brings up the Wikipedia article.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:40, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Let's continue this at the article talk page, where someone else has just joined in. Samsara 10:58, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Continue on your request

Could we continue on this request? --Goran tek-en (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Liberty Place Monument article

Good day. I notice you put a "tone" warning on the Battle of Liberty Place Monument article. Could you please be specific as to what problem(s) you think need to be addressed at Talk:Battle of Liberty Place Monument? Thanks! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 10:40, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Just wanted to thank you for the nice note you left on my talk page. It's also nice to see you as active as ever and doing great work! Cheers! -- Orionist ★ talk 09:48, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inviation to discussion page

Dear User:Kintetsubuffalo, Thank you for your recent valuable contributions to the Wikipedia page Peace Treaty with North Korea. The meaning of contents is now clearer and transparent because of your efforts and corrections. Please refer to the AfD discussion link below and comment your feedback for the topic if possible.

Goodtiming8871 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re:did you leave?

I have got vacances. I will about September 23th return.

Regards PawełMM (talk) 06:34, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Something that may interest you

Hello,

I changed some of your sock tags related to the Zeitgeist articles. I thought you may be interested to see ShantaethePirates SPI as this is the sock that is vandalizing those articles. -- Dane talk 02:27, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Graphics Lab

Your request has been completed. If satisfied please place a resolve tag on your request entry here, so we may close it. - FOX 52 (talk) 03:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo. A reply to your request at the Map workshop has been made. You may view your reply here.


Offnfopt(talk) 08:44, 17 October 2017 (UTC).[reply]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{GL Map reply}} template.

"At" vs. "of"

Over the last several months I've noticed numerous edits changing the preposition "at", indicating location, to more generic prepositions, specifically "of", and possibly also "in", in reference to a specific location. While there may be instances where "at" is not an appropriate preposition, it's perfectly acceptable and appropriate to use when indicating something located at a particular place or its immediate vicinity. Other prepositions, such as "of" and "in" don't always provide the same meaning; for example, "of" in the same construction carries the implication that something originated in that place, not merely that it was there at a certain or indefinite point. In biographical articles, origin and location need to be carefully distinguished, and so "at" is usually preferable when the writer is not trying to indicate the subject's point of origin. "In" implies that the subject was located only within the physical boundaries of a place, which is often more specific than the information that the writer intends to convey, and may be inaccurate. For example, you can meet someone at a restaurant, or a tree, or a town, without meeting inside it. I realize that some people prefer to use "in" when speaking of something that occurs "at" a particular city or town, but that's often misleading. And some people prefer to use "of" whenever there's some relationship between a person and a place; but again, it's often misleading or inaccurate, when "at" merely indicates location, without implying origin or spatial relationship. I hope that moving forward, you'll consider whether the writer intended to give a location, or indicate belonging, origin, or relationship to the place's boundaries. "At" may be correct in many instances where a writer has chosen to use "of" or "in", but those prepositions frequently imply meanings other than those supplied by "at". P Aculeius (talk) 03:04, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P Aculeius"Of" is not generic, it implies origin of, whereas "at" is a very specific location.
"particular place or its immediate vicinity"-Rome was a city of a million people. A "particular place" would be the Coliseum or the Pantheon, for instance. Vide:
at
1.In or very near a particular place.
at that precise position;  at Jim’s house
in
1.Used to indicate location, inclusion, or position within spatial, temporal or other limits
of
3.Expressing origin. 1.Indicating an ancestral source or origin of descent.
You can say all that without biting other editors.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:30, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not "biting" other editors. I'm sorry if you felt my wording was too harsh, but I was simply trying to make clear that this particular change remains unwarranted, as I had on several previous occasions, perhaps less-strongly worded. However, by the same token, you might expect that making the same stylistic change to a series of articles, and apparently ignoring the same objection to that change over a period of months, could seem like deliberate indifference to the intended meaning, or disrespectful to the editor trying to explain why the word used was the correct word for the situation. And I also note that you're the one who, perhaps a bit ironically, referred me to the "assume good faith" policy in an edit summary while re-reverting my reversion, even as I was trying to explain it clearly and without being insulting here on your talk page, in order to avoid the same situation coming up repeatedly. I always try to assume good faith, but so many of the edits to articles I patrol involve the substitution of one person's style preferences for another, without any other changes, that I may sometimes jump to conclusions (for instance, the never-ending change of "BC" and "AD" to "BCE" and "CE", which we classics editors constantly contend with; to me this seemed like another such an instance, but as you assure me that this wasn't your intention, I accept your explanation). Let's call it a draw when it comes to politeness, shall we, and say we could each have been less obviously irritable in the edit summaries.
As for the intended meaning, the definitions you've quoted clearly support the point I was trying to make above. When I say that people and families from Roman history were "at" ancient Rome, I'm stating that Rome was the location with which they were associated; not necessarily their point of origin (for instance, the gens Maria was probably not originally from Rome, and may have been of Sabine or Oscan origin), and certainly not that they were spatially limited (within) Rome (many of Marius' famous deeds occurred outside of Rome; while he lived at Rome, his family lived at Rome, they may have dwelt in a villa outside the city proper), etc. In some cases the difference may be one of emphasis: even when "in" could be used, it emphasizes the concept of "within", which isn't what I'm trying to stress, since individuals and families are highly mobile. A Roman gens might be centered at Rome but have many members living outside the city; "in" might imply that all of them lived or remained inside the boundaries of Rome. I reverted the changes because they altered the meaning of the sentences in unintended ways. I hope we've arrived at an understanding now; after all, we both intend to work collaboratively, not competitively, for the benefit of the readers. P Aculeius (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I submit that if several users have changed your words in the last few months, perhaps your word choice is not optimal. I've been teaching English for nearly 20 years. If the use is unclear to someone like me, then I daresay many others won't get it. But I'm not here to fight you or anyone.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:43, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"of". - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 20:01, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scout Association of the Bahamas 2015.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scout Association of the Bahamas 2015.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewing

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo.

As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors,
Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:46, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Midori (violinist)#Japanese name

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Midori (violinist)#Japanese name. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 08:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Talk:Cuisine of Karachi

The Cuisine of Karachi is significantly different from the Sindhi cuisine and the merge would not be feasible. The cuisine of Karachi is closer to the Mughlai cuisine than to the Sindhi cuisine. The dishes, recipes and the ingredients are different in these cuisines. Centaur17 (talk) 16:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Season's Greetings

Hello Kintetsubuffalo: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:02, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:52, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]




Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo.
AfC submissions
Random submission
3+ months
2,953 pending submissions
Purge to update

I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged.
Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 02:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Kintetsubuffalo!

Happy New Year!

Kintetsubuffalo,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
-- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Received Pronunciation: U and non-U

Hi, see [[4]] RoachPeter (talk) 09:06, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RoachPeter Thank "U"! ;) --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spock v Data

No arguments here. Spock has emotions, he simply suppresses them. Emotions are a valuable learning tool, hence Spock learns better than Data. Spock is also older than data, and could be portrayed by Nimoy throughout his life. They'd have to recast Data every 15 years to keep him going. Muah ha ha, people think I was joking when I mentioned having lists to prove these things...

The Je suis Ikea thing is actually a dig a Trump; around the time I made it (at the request of another editor) Trump had made a public remark about a recent terrorist attack in Sweden that never actually happened, except on some fake news site. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:26, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MjolnirPants Trick question-McCoy vs Crusher. --Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 00:47, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That is a trick question: McCoy would be the clear victor, except I never used to have dreams about him and Troi kissing... But the truth is: neither. The Doctor rises above the mediocrity of Voyager to be the stand-out victor. Owing mostly to his condescending bedside manner and programmatic inability to tolerate bullshit. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 07:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, the Crusher Maneuver... yes, many a late-teen fantasy for me. Just can't get into The Doctor kissing anyone, even if he were a porcelain redhead...--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I agree. He should stick to medicine and managing off-planet military installations. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:44, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MjolnirPants Okay, then Worf vs Teal'c, since we're headed there...
I can't say I can recall Teal'c falling victim to the Worf effect very often, though Worf is the original wolf-among-sheep-badass, and originality counts for a lot (plus, he learned to counter the Worf effect by the time he joined DS9). But c'mon, that's a trick question, too. Ronon Dex is the obvious winner, because he alternates between being completely fed up with being a badass and thoroughly enjoying the badass differential between himself and the rest of the cast. It depends on his mood. (And I have to add; it blows my mind to no end that no casting director in the years since SG-1 went off the air thought to get Michael Dorn and Chris Judge together on screen to give each other an arched eyebrow and a scowl, just for the fan service. There would be riots.)
Which, of course, leads us to the next logical question. Kirk or Jack O'Neill (two L's)? ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 04:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Jack O'Neill of course, understated, can't be bothered to pronounce Goa'uld the same way twice, we know he's been there and has the t-shirt, same kind of "Gallic indifference" that makes Jean Reno so cool. Geometrically then the question splits-part 1: Jack O'Neil (one L) or Jack Burton? part 2: Daniel Jackson or Daniel Jackson? Food for thought-imagine Michael Dorn and Chris Judge on Game of Thrones. _Then_ Dorne wouldn't have sucked.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:13, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Burton vs O'Neil... Well, that's a tricky one. If it's a one-on-one fight, or a clash of supporting characters, I'm gonna have to go with O'Neil. If it's a frat-style "who can get laid more", Burton takes the obvious cake (dat ego, tho). If it's a knife-throwing contest, I think it'd be a draw. If it's a drinking contest, O'Neil by a longshot (hey, I'd be drinking, too if I were him).
By the way, I have a comic somewhere in which Jack Burton and Snake Plissken meet in a post-apocalyptic future. I giggled all the way through it.
As for Jackson v Jackson... Rodney McKay. Because McKay was way more of a aspy-nerdy-neckbeard at the start, but by the final seasons of their respective shows, it became clear that both of them took a level in badass. Of course, depending on the rules, Data outdoes all others in this respect, because he minored in ass kicking. Hell, he could probably kick the crap out of an army made entirely of of Worf, Teal'c, Ronon and Burton clones. He's (in theory; we never really see it) quite possibly the ultimate badass in sci-fi adventure. But if we confine ourselves to what is shown on-screen, then McKay. Of, but then there's Picard and every time he's been in an action scene (or any time you try to torture him. THERE. ARE. FOUR. LIGHTS. Bitch.).
Hmmm, I guess what I'm getting at is; never pick a fight with a sci-fi nerd.
If Dorn and Judge were on GoT, then the show would have ran about 1-1/2 seasons; just long enough for them to kill almost all of the male cast members, impregnate the sand snakes, and then fight each other to a mutual death, at which point Samwell Tarly is the toughest SOB left alive on the continent, and thus he takes the throne to rule over his much-diminished kingdom.
Which naturally leads us to; Jon Snow or John Sheppard? ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:40, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Samwell Tarly is the toughest SOB left alive on the continent-us cute fat bookish types need to stick together. Sheppard of course, as he would never sleep with Daenerys I'm-queen-because-it's-my-turn. Kneel to me, I just got here Targaryen. Wish Randyll Tarly had finished his boss speech with "Wolverines!"
Many talk about "series fatigue", and it's obvious. The showrunners and their advisers (apparently George Lucas, M. Night Shyamalan and Michael Bay) should take some notes from the creators of South Park, which surprisingly has been running 20 years now and suffers no such visible series fatigue.
pre-season Tyrion/pre-season 5 Arya/Lyanna Mormont?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:54, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uh, Lyanna Mormont scares the shit out of me, and I know she's fictional. [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
The only possible competition she has is Eleven. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm aware of the show, but it hasn't caught on here in Japan, so I've never seen it.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 06:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, you really should, especially if you're of an age (as I am) where you grew up on PG-rated sci-fi and R-rated horror of the 1980's. If you access netflix through a netflix-dedicated proxy in the US, you can see the US selection. Hola works great for this; it's not particularly secure, so I wouldn't use it for that purpose, but security at netflix.com is plenty for your username and password, and hola proxies have a high bandwidth. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MjolnirPants Sha're in the series or Sha'uri in the film?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 12:29, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That one... I don't know. I think I'm going to go with Sha'uri because she had a far more active role than she did in the series.
How about Starbuck or Starbuck? ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:21, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kara Thrace is more developed as a character, but she was never on the A-Team.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:17, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
True, but in weapons accuracy, she would blow B.A. Baracus out of the water, and she's by far the superior cigar chomper to Hannibal Smith. Okay, maybe not "by far", but she certainly knows how to grin around a cigar and make me giggle in delight. And according to the miniseries DVD special features, Katee once took Dirk out for coffee, quipping that Starbuck was buying Starbuck a Starbuck, which is dad joke heaven, right there. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 15:37, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ya got me there-ladies and cigars... The cool thing about Japan is the limited sound pallet makes a lot of homonyms. The students roll their eyes every time I make an oyaji gyagu-old coot gag.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 15:58, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You know, I once made a point of studying Japanese with a friend of mine, and we got to where we could converse with each other to a limited degree. But I'll be damned if I really get what you're saying there, beyond recognizing that Japanese pronunciation of the two words would be similar enough for punning.
Most of my remaining Nihongo consists of a (very) few proper nouns, and a (small) handful of nouns and verbs related to martial arts. I've had no-one to speak it aloud with for over a decade, and romanji is hardly the preferred form on the internet, while my kanji, katakana and hiragana are essentially non-existent. Truth be told, I'm more than a little jealous of people who can speak it fluently. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 16:08, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
MjolnirPants [12]--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Oh man, being civilized is boring!" lol good stuff. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 13:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting in Turkmenistan

It's not often that I thank somebody for reverting my edits, but I thank you here as well as with the 'thank you' link - you are correct about the capitalizations. I put back the other minor edits (see the edit summary for the explanations).

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 15:30, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
scouting in Eastern Europe
and Central Asia
... you were recipient
no. 1558 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:59, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Black Mirror

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 12:01, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting/USA

Have anything to add Scouting/USA? --evrik (talk) 19:49, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dan Ownby for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Ownby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Ownby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:42, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Number of BSA Councils

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo. You have new messages at Talk:List_of_councils_(Boy_Scouts_of_America).
You can remove this notice at any time.

Invitation to join the Ten Year Society

Dear Kintetsubuffalo,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.

Best regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evrik (talk • contribs) 12:07, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

YGM

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 17:49, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:24th World Scout Jamboree.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:24th World Scout Jamboree.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Schweizer Pfadfinderbund.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Schweizer Pfadfinderbund.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:50, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Public display of affection and Disgust

Hey friend, please give me a hand on watching the recent edits by user:Cold Season ([13][14]). This user favors Chinese culture and is deleting the content that is related "disgusting" Chinese culture, but specifically single out Manchu and Japanese ones. All the sources he is citing about Manchus actually came from one - Shirokogorov's, Social Organization of the Manchus: A Study of the Manchu Clan Organization which is based on Shirokogorov's visit to Northern Manchuria (not all Manchus) in 1900s and is obviously out of date, too.--Šolon (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to join the discussion about the issue stated above ([15]).Thanks!--Šolon (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur W V Reeve

Have added dates and refs for the article on Arthur W. V. Reeve. Hugo999 (talk) 14:24, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dilara Büyükbayraktar

Notice

The article Dilara Büyükbayraktar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. scope_creep (talk) 08:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dilara Büyükbayraktar

Hi Kintetsubuffalo, IMDB is not a valid reference, it is non RS source and covered by WP:SPS. IMDB is user generated, and outwith editorial control. The only time it is valid, is if the information comes direct from the MPAA or the Writers Guild of America, and in both it is fact checked. A mini bio is not a valid source.scope_creep (talk)

Scope creep I got it and am working on it. There is an equally-poorly sourced Turkish article. Trying to drum up interest...--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Kintetsubuffalo. You have new messages at Talk:Shujaat Bukhari.
Message added 14:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 14:03, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Senior Scout (Corpo Nazionale Giovani Esploratori ed Esploratrici Italiani).svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Senior Scout (Corpo Nazionale Giovani Esploratori ed Esploratrici Italiani).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Color me surprised

I've had very positive interactions with you and hope to have more. I'm sure you can recite the Scout Law, but a brief review may be in order.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:14, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sphilbrick I appreciate your kindness, but the Scout Law is not a suicide pact or an endless supply of cheeks to turn. That user has been undoing my edits and being "civilly" aggressive to me for months. I've had it. I may get blocked but I won't get banned, I don't do anything to merit that, and I am a net benefit to the project. I wish someone would listen and run a search where our usernames intersect-then it would be quite evident why I don't regret or retract calling him out.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • A bit of advice: If you're being hounded, go report it at ANI. I'm dead serious, because you will end up being seen as the "bad guy" if you just respond by insulting BMK. If you have a good reason to be pissy, lay that reason out. Expecting an admin to dig into your editing history and find a pattern is a bit much, but if you do the work yourself (which would be easier for you, anyways), you could get BMK a one-way IBAN or something to make it stop. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 14:26, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heartwork Symphony Of Destruction.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heartwork Symphony Of Destruction.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:World Bureau (World Organization of the Scout Movement).png

Thank you for uploading File:World Bureau (World Organization of the Scout Movement).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 15:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:License plate dimensions mockup.png

You uploaded or restored , File:License plate dimensions mockup.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:50, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:India license plate Maharashtra examples.png

You uploaded or restored , File:India license plate Maharashtra examples.png, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work, please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers. You can also add |claimed=yes and an |author=to the {{media by uploader}} or {{presumed_self}} tag if it is present to indicate that you've acknowledged the image, and license shown (and updated the {{information}} where appropriate).

If it's not entirely your own work, then please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

It's okay to remove or strike this message once the issue has been resolved :).

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

License Plate images

Much appreciated if you could add or expand upon the {{information}} in these :

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think I am doing right now?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 17:47, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

San'yūtei

Please verify my interwiki. Xx236 (talk) 08:18, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11
10, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Be careful with scolding users

Hi Kintetsubuffalo! Let me start off by saying that you didn't do anything wrong (yeah, I know... it's a cliche and typical opener for messages like this... lol) but I wanted to message you and advise caution when leaving messages like this one to other users (even blatant trolls) where you state that you're "less receptive to liars", call them out for their unbelievable stories, and then state that you're "monitoring everything [they] edit from now on". These kind of messages will either frustrate, anger, or chase away legitimate new users who (despite the odds) are actually trying to help but don't appear to be, or they'll signal disruptive users to increase the amount of vandalism and trolling they're causing in order to do as much damage as possible while their account isn't blocked because you've told them that you're onto them and that they're now being watched. Either way you look at it, it usually never results in a positive or desired response or outcome. If you look on the user's talk page, I usually stick to leaving warnings or assuming good faith when possible (even if I know for sure that the user's intent is to vandalize and troll). It keeps the potential for retaliation low, doesn't draw attention to myself, and you're not allowing yourself to "play any cards face up". Figured I'd just message you and share ;-). Thanks for being a committed editor to Wikipedia and keep up the excellent work :-)! Best regards - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:13, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dirty War in Argentina

I have noticed several sourced paragraphs have been removed when looking at the Wikipedia Dirty War page as it appeared in early 2017. There appears to be an attempt to present a more sanitized version of events, blaming conservative and right wing Argentines while concealing the crimes of the crimes of the Left Wing Guerrilla Armies of the ERP and Montoneros. Your observations are most welcome. (Temruog (talk) 23:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC))[reply]

Today Thursday 26 July, I included the following paragraph at the bottom of intro of the Dirty War Pg:

The Montoneros later admitted losing 5,000 guerrillas killed or disappeared,[1] and the People's Revolutionary Army (Ejército Revolucionario del Pueblo or ERP) admitted the loss of another 5,000 of their own combatants killed or disappeared.[2]

It's important for the Argentine youth to not whitewash the crimes of the Left Wing Radicals that culminated in the 1976 Miltary Coup and the disappearances that followed among the guerrillas and their civilian supporters.

--Temruog (talk) 23:56, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wish

Hello. Help add file for Maureen Wroblewitz. Thank you. 125.214.51.223 (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ El ex líder de los Montoneros entona un «mea culpa» parcial de su pasado, El Mundo, 4 May 1995
  2. ^ A 32 años de la caída en combate de Mario Roberto Santucho y la Dirección Histórica del PRT-ERP. Cedema.org.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kintetsubuffalo&oldid=855708839"