Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Header: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Grammar fix (moving comma outside quotation, from "X," to "X",) |
Bon courage (talk | contribs) from vague and off-hand, to specific Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*'''Article.''' The Wikipedia article(s) in which the source is being used. For example: <nowiki>[[Article name]]</nowiki>.<br /> |
*'''Article.''' The Wikipedia article(s) in which the source is being used. For example: <nowiki>[[Article name]]</nowiki>.<br /> |
||
*'''Content.''' The exact statement(s) in the article that the source supports. Please supply a [[WP:Simplest diff guide|diff]], or put the content inside block quotes. For example: <nowiki><blockquote>text</blockquote></nowiki>. Many sources are reliable for statement "X", but unreliable for statement "Y". |
*'''Content.''' The exact statement(s) in the article that the source supports. Please supply a [[WP:Simplest diff guide|diff]], or put the content inside block quotes. For example: <nowiki><blockquote>text</blockquote></nowiki>. Many sources are reliable for statement "X", but unreliable for statement "Y". |
||
If a source has been the locus of chronic and intractable disputes, it may be appropriate to start a general discussion about whether it is generally reliable or unreliable. If the discussion takes the form of a [[WP:RFC|request for comment]], a common format for writing the RfC question can be found [[Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_258#RfC:_The_Daily_Caller|here]]. Such RfCs must include examples of the editing disputes that show why comments on the source are being sought. |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
|} |
|} |
Revision as of 13:02, 13 August 2022
Welcome to the reliable sources noticeboard. This page is for posting questions regarding whether particular sources are reliable in context. | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
While we attempt to offer a second opinion, and the consensus of several editors can generally be relied upon, answers are not official policy. | ||||||
Please focus your attention on the reliability of a source. This is not the place to discuss other issues, such as editor conduct. Please see dispute resolution for issues other than reliability. | ||||||
If you are looking for a copy of a specific source, please ask at the resource exchange board. | ||||||
Additional notes:
| ||||||
List of archives no archives yet (create)
|