Jump to content

Microblogging

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Deli nk (talk | contribs) at 16:59, 30 November 2016 (Undid revision 752301243 by Forshstar (talk)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Microblogging is a broadcast medium that exists in the form of blogging. A microblog differs from a traditional blog in that its content is typically smaller in both actual and aggregated file size. Microblogs "allow users to exchange small elements of content such as short sentences, individual images, or video links",[1] which may be the major reason for their popularity.[2] These small messages are sometimes called microposts.[1][3]

As with traditional blogging, microbloggers post about topics ranging from the simple, such as "what I'm doing right now," to the thematic, such as "sports cars." Commercial microblogs also exist to promote websites, services and products, and to promote collaboration within an organization.

Some microblogging services offer features such as privacy settings, which allow users to control who can read their microblogs, or alternative ways of publishing entries besides the web-based interface. These may include text messaging, instant messaging, E-mail, digital audio or digital video.

Services

The first microblogs were known as tumblelogs. The term was coined by why the lucky stiff in a blog post on April 12, 2005, while describing Christian Neukirchen's Anarchaia.[4]

Blogging has mutated into simpler forms (specifically, link- and mob- and aud- and vid- variant), but I don’t think I’ve seen a blog like Chris Neukirchen’s Anarchaia, which fudges together a bunch of disparate forms of citation (links, quotes, flickrings) into a very long and narrow and distracted tumblelog.

Jason Kottke described tumblelogs on October 19, 2005:[5]

A tumblelog is a quick and dirty stream of consciousness, a bit like a remaindered links style linklog but with more than just links. They remind me of an older style of blogging, back when people did sites by hand, before Movable Type made post titles all but mandatory, blog entries turned into short magazine articles, and posts belonged to a conversation distributed throughout the entire blogosphere. Robot Wisdom and Bifurcated Rivets are two older style weblogs that feel very much like these tumblelogs with minimal commentary, little cross-blog chatter, the barest whiff of a finished published work, almost pure editing...really just a way to quickly publish the "stuff" that you run across every day on the web

However, by 2006 and 2007, the term microblog was used more widely for services provided by established sites like Tumblr and Twitter. Twitter for one is especially popular in China, with over 35 million users tweeting in 2012, according to a survey by GlobalWebIndex.[6]

As of May 2007, there were 111 microblogging sites in various countries.[citation needed] Among the most notable services are Twitter, Tumblr, FriendFeed, Plurk, Jaiku and identi.ca. Different versions of services and software with microblogging features have been developed. Plurk has a timeline view that integrates video and picture sharing. Flipter uses microblogging as a platform for people to post topics and gather audience's opinions. PingGadget is a location-based microblogging service. Pownce, developed by Digg founder Kevin Rose among others, integrated microblogging with file sharing and event invitations.[7] Pownce was merged into SixApart in December 2008.[8]

Other leading social networking websites Facebook, MySpace, LinkedIn, Diaspora*, JudgIt, Yahoo Pulse, Google Buzz, Google+ and XING, also have their own microblogging feature, better known as "status updates". Although status updates are usually more restricted than actual microblogging in terms of writing, it seems any kind of activity involving posting, be it on a social network site or a microblogging site, can be classified as microblogging.

Services such as Lifestream and SnapChat will aggregate microblogs from multiple social networks into a single list, while other services, such as Ping.fm, will send out your microblog to multiple social networks.[citation needed]

Internet users in China are facing a different situation. Foreign microblogging services like Twitter, Facebook, Plurk, and Google+ are censored in China. The users use Chinese weibo services such as Sina Weibo and Tencent Weibo. Tailored to Chinese people, these weibos are like hybrids of Twitter and Facebook. They implement basic features of Twitter and allow users to comment to others' posts, as well as post with graphical emoticons, attach an image, music and video files.[citation needed] A survey by the Data Center of China Internet from 2010 showed that Chinese microblog users most often pursued content created by friends, experts in a specific field or related to celebrities.

Usage

Several studies, most notably by the Harvard Business School and Sysomos, have tried to analyze the user behaviour on microblogging services.[9][10] Several of these studies show that for services such as Twitter, there is a small group of active users contributing to most of the activity.[11] Sysomos' Inside Twitter[10] survey, based on more than 11 million users, shows that 10% of Twitter users account for 86% of all activity.

Twitter, Facebook, and other microblogging services are also becoming a platform for marketing and public relations,[12] with a sharp growth in the number of social media marketers. The Sysomos study shows that this specific group of marketers on Twitter is much more active than the general user population, with 15% of marketers following over 2,000 people and only .29% of the Twitter public following more than 2,000 people.[10]

Microblogging has also become an important source of real-time news updates during socio-political revolutions and crisis situations, such as the Mumbai terror attacks or Iran protests.[13][14] The short nature of updates allow users to post news items quickly, reaching its audience in seconds. Clay Shirky argues that these services have the potential to result in an information cascade, prompting fence-sitters to turn activist.[15]

Microblogging has noticeably revolutionized the way information is consumed. It has empowered citizens themselves to act as sensors or sources of information that could lead to consequences and influence, or even cause, media coverage. People now share what they observe in their surroundings, information about events, and their opinions about topics from a wide range of fields. Moreover, these services store various metadata from these posts, such as location and time. Aggregated analysis of this data includes different dimensions like space, time, theme, sentiment, network structure etc., and gives researchers an opportunity to understand social perceptions of people in the context of certain events of interest.[16][17] Microblogging also promotes authorship. On the microblogging platform Tumblr, the reblogging feature links the post back to the original creator.

The findings of a study by Emily Pronin of Princeton University and Harvard University's Daniel Wegner have been cited as a possible explanation for the rapid growth of microblogging. The study suggests a link between short bursts of activity and feelings of elation, power and creativity.[18]

While the general appeal and influence of microblogging seem to be growing continuously, mobile microblogging is still moving at a slower pace. Among the most popular activities carried out by mobile internet users on their devices in 2012, mobile blogging or tweeting was last on the list, with only 27% of users engaging in it.[19]

Organizational usage

Users and organizations often set up their own microblogging service – free and open source software is available for this purpose.[20] Hosted microblogging platforms are also available for commercial and organizational use.

Considering the smaller amount of time and effort to make a post this way or share an update, microblogging has the potential to become a new, informal communication medium, especially for collaborative work within organizations.[21][22] Over the last few years communication patterns have shifted primarily from face-to-face to online in email, IM, text messaging, and other tools. However, some argue that email is now a slow and inefficient way to communicate.[23] For instance, time-consuming "email chains" can develop, whereby two or more people are involved in lengthy communications for simple matters, such as arranging a meeting.[24] The one-to-many broadcasting offered by microblogs is thought to increase productivity by circumventing this.

Another implication of remote collaboration is that there are fewer opportunities for face-to-face informal conversations. Workplace schedules in particular have become much busier and allow little room for real socializing or exchange. However, microblogging has the potential to support informal communication among coworkers and help it grow when people actually do meet afterwards. Many individuals like sharing their whereabouts and status updates through microblogging.[citation needed]

Microblogging is therefore expected to improve the social and emotional welfare of the workforce, as well as streamline the information flow within an organization.[21] It can increase opportunities to share information,[22][25] help realize and utilize expertise within the workforce,[22] and help build and maintain common ground between coworkers.[21] As microblogging use continues to grow every year, it is quickly becoming a core component of Enterprise Social Software.

Dr. Gregory D. Saxton and Kristen Lovejoy at the University at Buffalo, SUNY have done a study on how nonprofit organizations use microblogging to meet their company needs and missions, with an emphasis on Twitter use. Their sample included 100 nonprofit organizations, 73 of which had Twitter accounts, and 59 that were considered “active,” or sent out a tweet at least three times a week. In a one-month time period 4,655 tweets were collected for analysis from these organizations.

They developed three categories with a total of 12 sub categories in which to place tweets based on their functions, and classify organizations based on the purpose of the majority of their tweets. The three head categories include information, community, and action. Information includes one-way interactions that inform the public of the organization's activities, events, and news. The community head category can also be broken down into two sub categories of community building and dialogue intended tweets. Community building tweets are meant to strengthen ties and create an online community, such as tweets giving thanks or showing acknowledgement of current events. Tweets meant to create dialogue are often interactive responses to other Twitter users or tweets invoking a response from users. Action tweets are used to promote events, ask people for donations, selling products, asking for volunteers, lobbying, or requests to join another cite.

Through their analysis, Saxton and Lovejoy were able to identify nonprofit organizations’ main purpose in using the microblogging site, Twitter, and break down organizations into three categories based on purpose of tweets: 1. “Information Sources,” 2. “Community Builders,” and 3. “Promoters & Mobilizers.” In their discussion of the study, they stated that they believe their findings are generalizable to other microblogging and social media sites.[26]

Issues

Microblogging is not without issues, such as privacy, security, and integration.[21]

Privacy is arguably a major issue because users may broadcast sensitive personal information to anyone who views their public feed. Microblog platform providers can also cause privacy issues through altering or presetting users' privacy options in a way users feel compromises their personal information. An example would be Google’s Buzz platform which incited controversy in 2010 by automatically publicizing users’ email contacts as ‘followers’.[27] Google later amended these settings.

On centralized services, where all of the Microblog's information flows through one point (e.g. servers operated by Twitter), privacy has been a concern in that user information has sometimes been exposed to governments and courts without the prior consent of the user who generated such supposedly private information, usually through subpoenas or court orders. Examples can be found in recent Wikileaks related Twitter subpoenas,[28][29][30][31] as well as various other cases.[32][33][34][35]

Security concerns have been voiced within the business world, since there is potential for sensitive work information to be publicized on microblogging sites such as Twitter.[36][37] This includes information which may be subject to a superinjunction.[38]

Integration could be the hardest issue to overcome, since it can be argued that corporate culture must change to accommodate microblogging.[citation needed]

Live Blogging is a derivative of microblogging that generates a continuous feed on a specific web page.

Instant messaging and IRC display status, but generally only one of a few choices, such as: available, off-line, away, busy. Away messages (messages displayed when the user is away) form a kind of microblogging.

In the Finger protocol, the .project and .plan files are sometimes used for status updates similar to microblogging.[39]

See also

Articles

Platforms

Services

References

  1. ^ a b Kaplan Andreas M.; Haenlein Michael (2011). "'The early bird catches the news: Nine things you should know about micro-blogging'" (PDF). Business Horizons, 54(2).. Retrieved June 5, 2014
  2. ^ "Measuring the Degree of Corporate Social Media Use". International Journal of Market Research. 57 (2): 257–275. March 2015. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  3. ^ S. Lohmann; et al. (2012). "'Visual Analysis of Microblog Content Using Time-Varying Co-occurrence Highlighting in Tag Clouds'" (PDF). AVI 2012 Conference.
  4. ^ Stop, For Blogging's Sake.
  5. ^ "Tumblelogs". kottke.org. 2005-10-19. Retrieved 2013-11-27.
  6. ^ Number of Active Twitter Users in Selected Countries. GlobalWebIndex. September 2012. Retrieved November 5, 2013.
  7. ^ Pownce Company profile. Retrieved October 14, 2013.
  8. ^ "Pownce website". Pownce.com. Archived from the original on 22 Jan 2014. Retrieved 2013-11-27. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 8 January 2013 suggested (help)
  9. ^ "New Twitter Research: Men Follow Men and Nobody Tweets". Harvard Business School. 2009-06-01. Retrieved 2009-06-23.
  10. ^ a b c "Inside Twitter: An In-depth Look Inside the Twitter World". Sysomos. 2009-06-10. Retrieved 2009-06-23.
  11. ^ "The More Followers You Have, The More You Tweet. Or Is It The Other Way Around?". TechCrunch. 2009-06-10. Retrieved 2010-06-23.
  12. ^ Jin, Liyun (2009-06-21). "Businesses using Twitter, Facebook to market goods". Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. Retrieved 2009-06-23.
  13. ^ "First Hand Accounts Of Terrorist Attacks In India On Twitter, Flickr". TechCrunch. 2008-11-26. Retrieved 2009-06-23.
  14. ^ "Twitter on Iran: A Go-to Source or Almost Useless?". 2009-06-22. Retrieved 2009-06-23.
  15. ^ Shirky, Clay. "The Net Advantage". Prospect Magazine. Retrieved 2014-10-24.
  16. ^ M. Nagarajan; et al. "'Spatio-Temporal-Thematic Analysis of Citizen-Sensor Data — Challenges and Experiences'". WISE 2009 Conference. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  17. ^ M. Auer; et al. "The Potential of Microblogs for the Study of Public Perceptions of Climate Change". WIREs Climate Change. {{cite web}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help) Retrieved March 7, 2014.
  18. ^ "Could this be a factor in the allure of microblogs?".
  19. ^ Statistics on the most popular activities for mobile internet users, Accenture. October 2012.
  20. ^ "StatusNet — Open Source microblogging service". Retrieved 2010-01-05.
  21. ^ a b c d Dejin Zhao; Mary Beth Rosson (May 2009). "'How and why people Twitter: the role that micro-blogging plays in informal communication at work'". ACM GROUP2009 Conference. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |lastauthoramp= ignored (|name-list-style= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ a b c D. Zhao; et al. (May 2011). "'Microblogging's impact on collaboration awareness: A field study of microblogging within and between project teams'". IEEE CTS2011 Conference. Archived from the original on August 10, 2014. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  23. ^ Ross Mayfield (October 15, 2008). "'Email hell'". Forbes. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  24. ^ "Delicious Productivity Improvements For This Flavor Partner". Socialtext.com. Archived from the original on November 19, 2009. Retrieved March 25, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  25. ^ Joab Jackson (November 20, 2009). "NASA program proves the benefits of social networking". Government Computer News. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  26. ^ Lovejoy, K., Saxton, D. (2012). "Information, Community, and Action: How Nonprofit Organizations Use Social Media". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 337-353.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  27. ^ "'Google Buzz redesigned after privacy complaints'". The Telegraph. London. February 15, 2010. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  28. ^ Whittaker, Zack (8 January 2011). "US Subpoenas Wikileaks Tweets, and Why This Could Affect You". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 11 January 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  29. ^ Sonne, Paul (10 January 2011). "U.S. Asks Twitter for WikiLeaks Data". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  30. ^ Greenwald, Glenn. "DOJ Subpoenas Twitter Records of Several WikiLeaks Volunteers". Salon. Archived from the original on 11 January 2011. Retrieved 10 January 2011. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
  31. ^ Beaumont, Peter (8 January 2011). "WikiLeaks Demands Google and Facebook Unseal US Subpoenas". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 10 January 2011.
  32. ^ Remizowski, Leigh. "NYPD to subpoena Twitter over theater threat". New York. CNN. Retrieved January 31, 2013.
  33. ^ Holland, Adam (January 24, 2013). "French Court Orders Twitter to Disclose User Identities". Chilling Effects. Retrieved January 31, 2013.[dead link]
  34. ^ "Twitter resists US court's demand for Occupy tweets". May 9, 2012. Retrieved January 31, 2013.
  35. ^ Jackson, Patrick (January 24, 2013). "French court orders Twitter to reveal racists' details". Retrieved January 31, 2013.
  36. ^ Emma Barnett (March 20, 2010). "'Have business networking sites finally come of age?'". The Telegraph. London. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  37. ^ "'A world of connections'". The Economist. Jan 28, 2010. Retrieved March 25, 2010.
  38. ^ "Twitter outings undermine "super injunctions"". Reuters. 2011-05-09.
  39. ^ "Show HN: Twtxt – Decentralised, minimalist microblogging service for hackers". 2016-02-06. Retrieved 13 March 2016.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microblogging&oldid=752323336"