User talk:Rjd0060/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 → Archive 12

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas to you!
Have a very merry Christmas, and a great new year! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Regards (and Season's Greetings!) from Stwalkerster [ talk ] 21:06, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

The Helpful One is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Thehelpfulone (talk) 16:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey!

I wasn't even notified that a PROD was added to the List of Romanian supercentenerians. Maybe I could have saved the article. Mario1987 21:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

ACC

Hi, this is just a request that you please review my access request to the ACC interface. Its been quite a while since I created an account there, just a couple of weeks after joining Wikipedia so it (rightly) got rejected. Not a problem if this gets declined again - I understand the concerns about granting the tool to only trusted and established users to prevent intentional or unintentional abuse.

details

user_id: 331
user_name: Unpopular Opinion
user_onwikiname: Unpopular Opinion
user_email: ----------@gmail.com
log_id: 21054
log_pend: 331
log_user: Rjd0060
log_time: 2008-11-15 16:17:25
log_cmt: Your first edit was only a few weeks ago (October 25, 2008). You are welcome to help out once you've been around for a while longer.

I'm not sure how much time it really takes to gain the necessary trust, maybe 6 months or 1 year? If so, I'm here quite early as its only been around three months.. Thanks Unpopular Opinion (talk) 18:07, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, it won't let me create an account again with the same onwiki username, but thanks anyway. I think I'll leave it. Happy editing! Unpopular Opinion (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Template talk:Callsigndis/doc

No particular issue with the deletion but, for what it's worth, that redirect was put in place per the instructions at WP:DOC:

"You may wish to redirect the talk page of the /doc subpage to the talk page of the template itself. Then all talk relating to the template and its documentation will end up on the same talkpage. For example, redirect Template talk:X/doc to Template talk:X."

Regards Mlaffs (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Your input

Hey Rjd0060. I think your input would be highly appreciated here. Regards, — Aitias // discussion 04:23, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

your assistance please...

The record shows you deleted the article Mike Moran (firefighter) -- as an expired {{prod}}.

Could you please userify this article, and its history and talk page, to User:Geo Swan/review/Mike Moran (firefighter)?

You may have noticed this phenomenon -- some of the wikipedia's quality control volunteers are impatient, overzealous, or unwilling to comply with the spirit of the wikipedia's civility policies. They do not comply with the deletion policies' recommendations that those nominating articles for deletion leave an advisory heads-up on the talk page of the contributors who started the article, or made major contributions to it.

The result is "stealth deletions" -- the deletion of perfectly satisfactory articles where those interested in the article didn't defend the article because they were unaware that it had been nominated for deletion.

I write on controversial topics. And I am afraid I have encountered vandals who count on this weakness in the wikipedia's policies in order to push their private, personal agendas.

Personally, I would lobby for a change in policy where the advisory heads-up was no longer an optional courtesy, but was required, and policy stated administrators should decline to conclude nominations where the article creator didn't inform the interested parties.

Sure, lots of article that are {{prod}}ed or nominated for speedy-deletion merit deletion. But I believe that skipping the step of informing the uploader or creator is a mistake in those cases too. When contributors add material that does not comply with policy and merits deletion I think the policy on assuming good faith implies they should be told that someone thought they made a mistake that serious. Informing the contributor who the nominator thinks is making serious mistakes is the best way to try to make sure that contributor doesn't keep making the same mistake. And, of course, there are going to be cases where the nominator is the one who was mistaken. Hopefully that is going to be a small minority of cases. But I have experienced this many times -- instances where someone nominated an article I started for provisional deletion, didn't offer me the courtesy advisory, and, when I found out about the deletion, long afterwards, and got it restored, it was clear the nominator erred.

I think I must have gone through this at least a dozen times. It is a lot of work, and in my opinion it highlights a serious flaw in the existing policy.

Thanks! Geo Swan (talk) 04:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. I started an article, over a year ago, about the firefighter who lead a team that made the highest known advance in the first building to collapse. I spent some time writing it, and finding references. Some time afterwards it was realized that his time had made it much higher that had previously been realized, and that they had been unaware that the building was about to collapse until practically the last moment.
I can't find it now. I believe it was subjected to a stealth deletion.
Thanks again. Geo Swan (talk) 04:36, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Sci Willy Wonka

Dear Rjd0060, thanks for blocking Sci Willy Wonka. The account was trying to harass Raul654. It is probably a sock of someone. It is making disruptive comments on its talkpage. I think you should protect its talkpage. Have a nice day. AdjustShift (talk) 17:54, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

WP:PROD

Hey Rjd0060. Are you using a script to delete expired WP:PROD articles? If you do, would you mind explaining how I can use that script as well? :) Thanks! — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. I have added importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkleprod.js'); importScript('User:AzaToth/twinkledeprod.js'); to my monobook.js, however that seems to be not enough. Is there anything else I have to add? — Aitias // discussion 00:17, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
Well, it did work. However, it does not delete the talk pages. Therefore I have removed it again. Thanks a lot for the help. :) — Aitias // discussion 00:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

"List of XMPP library software" deletion : disagreement

It was proposed to delete the "List of XMPP library software" with following arguments : "This is a list article with only two entries which have articles. Everything else is either a red link or an external link." That's not an argument at all for deletion : please let to the community time to make the article grow, we are not in hurry.

"As such, it seems to be a list of probably non-notable software."

Please, your deletion is based on assumption. After checking myself, this libraries are notable software, since they allow to build jabber software on top of them. There is already a "List of XMPP Server Software", and "List of XMPP Client Software" : it makes sense to have a "List of XMPP Library Software". I checked the C section and php section : they are ok. Again, as computer engineer, I say that this content is valuable and must stay there.

"Maybe some of these are notable but there are no references to help determine which ones." You didn't let us time to put notes on them : you let us only 5 days before deletion, and during christmas. It really does not make sense under this condition... It seems that you was determined to delete this article without further discussion.

"Not verifiable. For all we know some of these entries could be hoaxes." Based on assumption again, and easily verifiable since I do it for the C and php section.

So please revert the deletion, and let us several months with a proposal to enhance the article contents. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.93.61.213 (talk) 15:36, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Yikai123

This user (Yikai123 (talk · contribs)) is requesting unblock. It seems he was collateral damage from a rangeblock you recently imposed. He doesn't edit much, and his edits look OK to me. Should we lift the autoblock? Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

December 2008

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. MUAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! :) NonvocalScream (talk) 21:36, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

NonvocalScream (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!=)
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Mr.Z-man has passed you the WikiJoint! WikiJoints promote... uh... promote... help with... do... wiki... something... yeah... uh, what was I saying? WikiJoints help promote, uh, wiki stuff... and help with... {{subst:User:Krimpet/WikiJoint}}... huh?

21:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Moar WikiLove

 Jake WartenbergTalk has given you a pie! Pies promote the kind of hearty eating that puts a smile on your face and a sustaining meal in your stomach. Hopefully this pie has made your day better. Spread the goodness by giving someone else a pie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy eating!

Spread the goodness of pie by adding {{subst:Wikipie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

21:59, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

Hello, Rjd0060. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Rjd0060. Thank you. — Aitias // discussion 00:56, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

zomg drama. "Abuuuuuse!1" Really, Aitias? There are more important things to be focusing on, no? --MZMcBride (talk) 08:26, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
One would think so ...... One would be wrong, apparently. - Rjd0060 (talk) 15:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
MZMcBride, you are right and Rjd0060, you have an e-mail. — Aitias // discussion 19:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

Questions about Template:PermissionOTRS

I left a note at the template's talk page but the page didn't seem to be much-watched. Perhaps you can help? Here's the question:

Is this template supposed to be placed by the users granting permission via email or by OTRS reviewers? If the former is the case, shouldn't there be a confirmation process proving the legality of the template placement?

Thanks in advance. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. If that is the case, could you look at ticket 2008121010024392? It was placed at Talk:Chom Dong by the creator of the article. --Paul_012 (talk) 15:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
I see. Perhaps Commons:File:Chom Dong.jpg should also be tagged? --Paul_012 (talk) 15:55, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Betacommand's page

Hey Rjd0060,

I wanted to let you know, Betacommand's discussion on AN/I has been closed. The indef tag is now, unfortunate as it is, appropriate. Hopefully roux's off-wiki discussion will come of something. I just wanted to let you know, as you were the last to revert on it. Thanks!

Neuro√Logic 15:48, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Nir Rosen Description

The entry under the description of Nir Rosen reads "he is an Iranian-American journalist and a chronicler of the Iraq War". Mr. Rosen in his own writing calls himself an Israeli and has discussed some of his heritage in this article:

This Broken Home Revisiting Israel by Nir Rosen

I really don't understand how the phrase "Iranian-American" was inserted when it's very clear that's not the case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.41.7.216 (talk) 09:54, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Dear Rjd0060,

Wishing you a happy new year, and very best wishes for 2009. Whether we were friends or not in the past year, I hope 2009 will be better for us both.

Kind regards,

Majorly talk 21:02, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

delete yourself - you are not notable human

Google first! Then delete! Google not only in english pages... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.236.0.198 (talk) 11:21, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Recentchangestext

Hello, may I perhaps draw your attention to MediaWiki talk:Recentchangestext#Removal of "dead" link? Plrk (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Mayallld

Mayallld (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) Thanks for blocking. Looks like an impostor for User:Mayalld. Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 01:41, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

ACI

Could you please activate my account, MattieTK, on the ACI. On logging in it says that it's "suspended", but I haven't ever logged in, so I'm not sure as to what this refers to. Please get back to me if there are any issues :) MattieTK 17:32, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Please restore these articles

Hi, can I ask you to restore the following articles most of which you deleted? There are discussions in progress to turn all of these character bios into a list, and it would be useful not to loose the content. --Deadly∀ssassin 20:39, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Further

I just found some more pages that I'd like to have restored, could you please do the honours with these? --Deadly∀ssassin 00:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks for your help, could you restore Faye Donnelly to my namespace so that I can work on it there? --Deadly∀ssassin 00:41, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Even more

  • You were busy on April 25th! :D I've discovered more articles that I'd like to have restored if you wouldn't mind. --Deadly∀ssassin 13:32, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Scripts

I can haz script? --MZMcBride (talk) 22:16, 6 January 2009 (UTC)


Deletion review for Jean sutton

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jean sutton. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Ezra Wax (talk) 04:48, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I just added in the tag that was recommended at Proposed Deletion. If you don't like the wording of the tag, I'm sure you there's some process for changing it. Ezra Wax (talk) 17:35, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

User: Termsandconditionsapply

I saw you fulfilled an unblock request for this user. Did I miss something and he was still blocked in some way? Jauerbackdude?/dude. 16:45, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Got it; I've never had to remove an autoblock before. Thanks. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 17:00, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Medallist

You deleted Medallist despite a specific note added that the original redirect to Medal and hatnote should be reverted to. Please restore these. Johnbod (talk) 01:31, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks - I forgot that before the band article there was just a redirect, so I have gone back to that. The hatnote was only needed when the band article was there. Johnbod (talk) 02:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
No problem - thanks for the prompt response! Johnbod (talk) 02:18, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

The Killer Inside Me (film)

Could you explain why you deleted the page The Killer Inside Me (Film)? The page was deleted because of a tag that said that the page was not notable because production had not started. But if you had read the page it was clearly stated that production had started. Hda3ku (talk) 03:28, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

The Deletion was opposed on the talk page where the template said to have a dussicion about if needed. Hda3ku (talk) 03:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Yes I read the link and did not read the part of the template that said to remove is contested. Hda3ku (talk) 03:46, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank You I'll read the templates better next time. Hda3ku (talk) 03:58, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Flagged Revs

Hi,

I noticed you voted oppose in the flag revs straw pole and would like to ask if you would mind adding User:Promethean/No to your user or talk page to make your position clear to people who visit your page :) - Thanks to Neurolysis for the template   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk) 07:22, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Dennis O'Rear

Perhaps you are right about notability...Don't wait then for 5 days just remove it now.

Cleobatra (talk) 15:25, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Cleobatra

Thanks!

Thanks for the quick response on my request for access to -admins! GJC 05:58, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Dorothy Kloss

I didn't see a review of this deletion or another way to take action to stop deletion and add third party ref's (the reason you deleted) which in the very least are that she appeared in Guinness Book of World Records at least a few times including in 2009. The page in question (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dorothy_Kloss&action=edit&redlink=1). Please advise how I may proceed to get back the article and add third party ref's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.62.8.98 (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


NHLTeamSeason

Thanks for letting me know! I'll just keep my eyes open to see what will happen with it. Andrew647 04:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Gah, double posting! Oops Andrew647 04:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

New Wikibooks logo for main page

Hi. Care to scale-down File:Wikibooks-logo.svg and replace the current one on Template:WikipediaSister? It is their new logo and I noticed you did some/all of the other ones. - Rjd0060 (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Hello! I've updated the transcluded image (File:Wikibooks-logo-35px.png). Thanks! —David Levy 09:36, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Kanonkas

Thank you Rjd0060 for voting in my successfully closed RfA! I'm glad that you trust me. Ping me if you need anything (I'm sure it's going to be me asking you!) Best regards, --Kanonkas :  Talk  18:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Personal attacks

may i ask why i would get blocked for calling someone an idiot and also why did he/she delete the medic droid page theres no reason to. (im not trying to be rude btw) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.11.48.166 (talk) 18:15, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Dude!

The holy crap! What did you do to my watchlist? Barnstar
I hereby award you this award for completely ruining my watchlist by adding the year parameter to all hockey team season articles. Your dedication to such a mind-numbingly boring task, and the hundred-and-some entries it generated on my watchlist are noted.  ;) Cheers! Resolute 02:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
I see that, well done! When I actually had to do a text search to find WP:HOCKEY on my watchlist, I knew I had to award you with something, lol. Resolute 02:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Year parameter

Awesome job, but there's a glitch: it suffers the Y2K bug! The season articles are written 1999-2000... and the parameter seems to want to write 1999-00, so it makes red links for all of the 1998-99 article templates. A solution would be to make redirects, want me to get on top of that? Andrew647 03:28, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd found it going through the Toronto seasons. I'll get on those redirects asap. Andrew647 04:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Done, except there's an issue with the St. Louis Blues: it seems to be a disambiguation problem where the team article is labeled "St. Louis Blues (ice hockey)", and I think that has an effect on the year parameter. Just check out 1998–99 St. Louis Blues season. I'm not sure what to recommend to fix this. Andrew647 05:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Cool, glad to see it sorted out! Cheers, Andrew647 23:31, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Aether22

Well, I tried to discuss it with him, but I his response was especially unhelpful. At this point, I'm pretty sure his obfuscation is deliberate, and he's exhausted whatever slack I'm willing to give him. Put simply, he's trolling us, and rewarding him for it isn't going to serve us well. Nandesuka (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


Eric Tangradi

You shouldn't have deleted that article. As per wikipedia's athlete guidelines "People who have competed at the highest amateur level of a sport, usually considered to mean the Olympic Games or World Championships" are allowed to have articles. Eric just competed at the World Junior Championship, in Ottawa, Ontario, Dec. 26, 2008-Jan. 5, 2009. You need to restore it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blizzboy283 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

UserCompare tool

Hello there, just noted your evidence provided at the Administrator's noticeboard for the John254/Kristen fiasco. Is the UserCompare tool open source? It may come in handy for an Arbitration case I'm connected with. Thanks. ←Spidern→ 13:20, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Dave Ian McCall

Hi, this might be a reasonable redirect. -- Banjeboi 12:00, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Categories

[1] Ok, I won't. Sorry, I did not know it automatically puts the page in speedy deletion category. OIC, I think I see: the original deletion request is normal, not speedy. Is that it?Dc76\talk 16:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Again, I am sorry, I simply did not know the effect. Dc76\talk 17:09, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

The Histronic

You may want to take a look at this - you previously deleted it as an expired PROD, it's back, but I don't know what the previous content was or if the reason for deletion still applies, or if it can be speedily deleted as a re-creation. pablohablo. 18:10, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

List of songs in 02Jam

GJ Deleting page "List of songs in O2Jam." It's not like it was an accurate list or anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.86.126.21 (talk) 00:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Indukti

On 1 August 2008 you deleted the Wikipedia entry for Polish band Indukti, claiming that it failed to meet the notability guidelines for music. However, it would appear that you don't know the slightest bit of information about this band, considering they clearly meet the very first criteria listed!

"1. It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.

This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries"

Did you even bother doing a Google search? If you had, it would have become apparent that there is a plethora of online information from reliable sources not at all linked to the band.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.200.7 (talk) 07:53, January 20, 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Disney Consumer Products

An article that you have been involved in editing, Disney Consumer Products, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disney Consumer Products. Thank you. Cybercobra (talk) 02:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of CacheFly

On 00:22, 27 January 2009 you deleted CacheFly because expired WP:PROD even though you declined speedy deletion. It does not appear there was any discussion (or I cannot find the discussion). I ask that you please restore the article and we do a proper AfD review. I believe that a good deal of sourced content was removed from the page, causing the article to be a stub and causing the reason for deletion. There is a good deal of material that can be referenced for this article and I can compare to several similar companies that are just as notable that are retaining articles: Bitgravity, Limelight_Networks and a list including companies like this: Content_Delivery_Network#Commercial_CDNs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattarata (talk • contribs) 17:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Reinstate visiting card

Hi,

Could you reinstate blue-tooth visiting card. The usefulness of the article is to bring convenience to the world. It is a simple example of how technology can be used to serve humanity and how technology can be used to transfer information using simple tools like mobile phones. Please kindly read articles properly before deleting. As far as I know you can edit artilcles in wikipedia, so kindly learn to edit articles and not "delete" them. Because it is very very difficult to contribute and very easy to just say "delete".

Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wekipediauser (talk • contribs) 11:13, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for the message on where I can already find a discussion on the "flagged revisions" issue. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 16:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Information visualization reference model

Hi,

You've deleted the above articel with the reason "Deleted because expired WP:PROD; Reason given: There seems hardly any reliabe sources here, just the original work by E.H. Chi. There is serious doubt this subject is notable. See talk page.".

I think this happened in error as the version from google cache shows 6 references from 2 distinct groups of authors including contributions published with Morgan Kaufmann Publishers and CHI_(conference). These should coun't as reliable sources.

Regarding the notability the Article seems a little bit thin but it's not just an idea but it's used in the real world as you can see with Prefuse plus it is linked in from some Articels that discuss visualization in general. This design pattern is usefull to understand the way visualization software is built and used and is not specific to an implementation. Software design patterns are well documented in wikipedia with a less reference material (although these patterns are not so specific). I wasn't able to take a look at the talk page to this articel so I can't see any arguments there.

Regards Sr9182 (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Please restore the articel Sr9182 (talk) 10:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Quit deleting Al Kapone albums

Al Kapone is a well-known and well-respected rapper. Quit deleting his albums saying they fail WP:MUS because they don't. People like you piss me off. You know nothing. Get a hobby. 71.10.88.69 (talk) 02:07, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

OK. - Rjd0060 (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of "The Reincarnation"

I noticed that last month you deleted the page of "The Reincarnation", a browser-based computer game. While i do have a vested interest in the topic, i'm more curious about the reason given than the actual deletion. This is a game with thousands of players that has existed in one version or another since 1998(ish?). That no one has "published" any "sources" hardly seems a good reason to delete a page, neither does low enough readership that no one noticed the deletion tag within 5 days. There are towns with smaller populations than this page that are far less well developed than The Reincarnation page was before it was deleted, yet they remain because they are more "verifiable" per wikipedia's "encyclopedic contents" policy? There has to be a better way to determine legitimacy of this type of article... Sorry, i guess you don't really make these rules, but i wanted to vent.

cheers, Archtemplar (talk) 16:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Can you do me a favor?

We've had a few encounters in the past, so sometimes if I need admin help I come to you because I know I can get a quick response. Anyway, we are having some trouble over at United States men's national soccer team. Now, I don't know if you follow soccer at all, so I'll try to explain this well in case you aren't familiar with any of the subjects. One of the players on the US team (Bocanegra) plays for a French team called Stade Rennais Football Club. This club is located in the French town of Rennes, and since "Stade Rennais" is sort of long, more often than not the team is referred to as Rennes. Ligue 1 is the French league, and if you look at the 2008-09 league standings right here on Wikipedia you'll see that the team is listed as Rennes. It is the same on websites such as Yahoo Eurosport and the BBC; basically, this is the accepted common name for the team. So, we had a discussion and determined it would be most accurate to use the name Rennes to refer to that team. Everyone agreed except for one editor: User:Grant.Alpaugh. Usually when an editor loses a discussion, they just let it go. Grant refuses to do that and has taken a "everybody is wrong except for me" approach to the problem. If you look on the talk page for the US national team article, a vote has taken place and everyone except for Grant is in agreement. Also, if you read the section "Club names," you will get an understanding of the immense frustration that grows when one editor ignores the decision making process and unilaterally makes changes (I had a problem with doing this in my early editing days, so I know firsthand how annoying it can be).

Basically, Grant needs to be blocked from editing this article for the time being. If you read my talk page you'll see that he started a 3RR report against me. I readily admit I broke the 3RR, but only because, in my view, Grant was repeatedly vandalizing the article by making edits against established consensus. If you choose to block me as well I fully understand. However, Grant not only broke the 3RR himself, but has continually shown a vast disregard for the opinions of other editors and conclusions we have come to after extensive discussion. Basically, he thinks he runs the article and refuses to accept other opinions - even when he is vastly out numbered. If you could take a look at our horribly messed up discussion and get back to me, that would be awesome. Eightball (talk) 19:58, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Protected user talk page

Awhile back, you protected User talk:Afghan Historian as a retired user, but he has re-appeared, making POV edits and needs to be warned. carl bunderson (talk) (contributions) 04:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


I've returned

You may not remember me but I briefly returned to do some correcting several months back. I've since returned and would like to restore my wikipedia page. Is that possible? Thanks! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Afghan Historian (talk • contribs) 04:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Steve Pasquin

You deleted this under WP:PROD but I challenge the deletion. Because a bunch of similar articles exist (see Template:Oz(HBO)) they should all be deleted or none at all. So in accordince with WP:PROD can you undelete? --Movingday29 (talk) 19:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring this. --Movingday29 (talk) 02:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Removal of advanced permissions (proposed)#Neutral

I have created a Neutral section for those who agree with the premise but not the method, or some other aspect, which may be altered following talkpage discussion. Perhaps you would wish to review your !vote under the changed circumstances? LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:55, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Lithuania

Thanks for the response to my request for page protection. As usual, I'm certain you got it wrong at a bad version, etc., etc., --KP Botany (talk) 01:47, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

On the other hand, if I were the admin, I would get it right every time. Remember that when my RfA comes up. --KP Botany (talk) 01:52, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

"Rani Babu" Deleted Page Needed

Rani Babu is an upcoming Malayalam movie star. I created a page about her but couldn't improve it for some time. I would like to make it a complete bio if I can get the deleted page back. How do I get it back? I can't collect all that information again. I have been working on other pages that's also deleted. Gad! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchandran (talk • contribs) 05:51, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Please help

I am trying to get the content from a page I made that has been deleted - Benjamin Harnwell.

Can you send it to me or tell me how to retrieve it.

Rhiannon Price —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhijane (talk • contribs) 14:24, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

ACC

Ahhh... Thank you RJD ;). I'll make sure I'm quite familiar with the guide before I do anything. I was surprised, I expected a huge backlog (like new page patrol), but see it's kept up with very well. I've bookmarked your talk page, as I'm sure I'll have a question or 10 somewhere down the line. Thank you again, and a pleasure to meet you - have a good one. — Ched (talk) 18:49, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Tony Kaldas

Please Restore the page for the Egyptian Singer Tony Kaldas , as he is well known and famous in the Arabic world and i don't know why you deleted it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.205.135.149 (talk) 06:02, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Note that I have now removed the majority of this article's content as it was a blatant copyright violation - pasted in from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=7372202126 and http://www.tonykaldas.com/about.html - Voceditenore (talk) 15:24, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Feather Linux

Hey could you please undo the deletion of Feather Linux its well known. If you want published sources then there are several in books; this distro has a page on distrowatch and was reviewed by [2] Linux Format magazine. It free software so it unfortunately dosen't receive much publicity commercially. Magic.Wiki (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


I feel you deleted the page on Ciarán Ó Con Cheanainn in error. Past Winers of Corn Uí Riada and this one also, should be mentioned- just because there isn't a lot of info on him or the others doesnt mean that he shouldnt be included- its more just the fact that pepole havent gotten around to writing about them yet./ In realtion to this particular person many of the main media outlets/ newspapers in Ireland carried obituaries of him- Irish Times is one example. One of the past winners Máirtín Tom Sheáiní- a radio presenter on Radio na Gaeltachta- extant- if someopne were to start an article on him would it be deleted because of lack of information on him? In general I think one can't realy delete a page on a particular subject (however small) especially if they are not an expert in that subject (I imagine you are not) - imagine someone writes a topic on a rare scientific subject- you can;'t just delete it if you feel taht its not "big" enough- not to say that the article you deleted was off small interest- it isnt- And the competition he won and his winnign of it was covered on state broadcasters in ireland. I really think you should reconsider your own guidelines - you can answer me at eoinomurchu@hotmail if you wish. (for example- I myself entered this persons name to find outmore about them- this/ verifiable info should be availale) thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.1.172.104 (talk) 20:18, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

 Done by stifle. MBisanz talk 15:48, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Ioquake3

Once again the ioquake3 wikipedia entry has been deleted for being without notability when, in fact, this is wholly inaccurate. ioquake3 is the de-facto standard in quake 3 engine technology with many games and other projects being based on it. Some of those games include Urban Terror, World of Padman, and tremulous. I created ioquake3 in 2005 and it has continued since then with the help of many contributors. To say that it is irrelevant does the project and those that use it a severe disservice and I think contributes to the overall discouragement of smaller open source and free software projects, as if they and the contributions made to them are without merit. id software created the original code base and released it onto the internet. To say that projects based on the original source release are not notable is like saying that it wouldn't be notable if Ray Bradbury released a book under a creative commons license solely to the net and someone took that and made an entirely new and interesting work of fiction based on it.

Of course, having created ioquake3 you can take my words with a grain of salt. Please don't let that stop you from researching the notability of the project yourself. Perhaps starting with these links:

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/566/1040566/two-free-games-based-on-the-quake-3-engine-tip-up

http://www.linux.com/feature/136752

--TimeDoctor (talk) 02:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

ioquake3 is indeed the best updated version of id Software Inc.'s GPL release of the Quake III Arena engine source code. Over the years the project stayed true to it's objectives to make the original code base easier to work with, available on a wider variety of platforms, and to provide a solid base for several projects that wanted to build upon the technology.

I was the maintainer of Quake III Arena for several years until the company released it as GPL, and I am pretty happy there are people like Zachary who stepped up to the plate afterwards.

It seems very odd to me that content would be removed based on an individual's personal appreciation of relevance. If the article provides useful information and references, it should at least be valued for the efforts of the contributing individuals.

Timothee Besset,
Software Engineer
id Software, inc.

TTimo (talk)

How can ioq3 not be relevent when some of the maintainers have, as part of the project, provided fixes that have made it into id's official Q3 codebase? From the Quake 3 1.32c readme:

1.32c (5-8-06)
- Ludwig Nussel and Thilo Shulz discovered a vulnerability letting a malicious client download files from a server if auto download is enabled ( sv_allowDownload 1 ).
- A second issue fixed in this release (R_RemapShaders buffer overflow) would let a malicious server exploit a buffer overflow to execute a shellcode on connecting clients.

I would like to point out that both Ludwig Nussel and Thilo Shulz are active participants in the ioq3 project. If id, the producer of the original game that ioq3 is based on, recognizes ioq3's work as being relevent, what more is needed? Isn't that both verification and validation of ioq3's contribution to software? I mean, heck, you can cite actual publications (not blogs or other sissy webpages) as references to show that ioq3 is recognized time and again as one of the premier OSS games released.

ioq3 is especially notable for its wide range of platform support and write-once-run-anywhere Quake Virtual Machine ability which lets ioq3 run on Windows (x86 and x64), Linux (x86 and x64), Linux PPC (32 and 64 bit), FreeBSD, Solaris (SPARC and x86), Irix (MIPS), Mac OS X (x86 and PPC), and was recently the initial basis for a port of Quake 3 to the iPhone, an ARM-based device. Just google for "quake 3 iphone" to see all the press and buzz THAT generated. If that's not notable, I don't know what is! There are many modern commercial game engines that don't support what ioq3 supports such as in-engine VoIP and IPv6. Heck, the VoIP stuff is from someone recognized both in the professional game programming arena and also by Wikipedia itself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_C._Gordon

-Monk


Shame you thought this article had to be deleted; this could have been a discussion on improving the article to wikipedia's standard. But you might have too much work to do in the foreseeable future as probably so many articles, about softwares/video games, are failing to meet those same requirements and therefore need to be "cut off" (weird principle for a participative online encyclopaedia).

Regards,

Tam


Sad... Just plain sad.

-Richard 'JBravo' Allen.

 Done by davewild. MBisanz talk 15:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Wireless Thessaloniki

Please undelete our wireless's community page (Wireless Thessaloniki, WThess in short). It was deleted by you on 18 of September under WP:COR. I beg you to reconsider. We are the oldest wireless community in Thessaloniki. In Thessaloniki there are 4 communities and all of them existed before our deletion in wikipedia. Take a note on TWMN's page, which refers to us (Wireless Thessaloniki, WThess). We have participated with TWMN in Helexpo's Infosystem (Information Technology Exhibition) and we were noted in local press. It would be an omission to exclude as from wikipedia since the other 3 wireless communities are present.

Thank you. Arxytas

I was surprised to be informed by a fellow WThess node owner that the wikipedia entry for the Wireless Thessaloniki network that I had posted to the site does not exist anymore. I am not a frequent wikipedia author, so I wasn't aware that the article was candidate to be deleted. I also see that a picture that I have included in the article, which was actually taken with my photo camera, was deleted for copyright reasons! It is obvious that the problem arise due to the fact that I am not well informed on some aspects and conditions of keeping an article in Wikipedia, and I would like to apologize for that. I would like to re-establish the page. WThess is actually one of the last wireless communities left in Thessaloniki, as most of them decayed after aDSL subscriptions became cheaper and affordable. It is a part of the wireless communities' history of the city, if not of the country. Thank you for your time. ThanaSakis

 Done MBisanz talk 15:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Joyce McKinney

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Joyce McKinney. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 15:49, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

 Handled at DRV. MBisanz talk 15:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of AbleNET

Hello, you deleted the article for AbleNET without any form of due process or notification and I'd wish for you to first, reconsider as well as explain your position. Notability arguments seem questionable. Notability is no greater or less than other articles of comparable content.

Article was up for AfD on 2/12/2006 through 2/14/2006 and successfully passed.

"As a shortcut around AfD for uncontroversial deletions, an article can be proposed for deletion, though once only. If no one contests the proposal within five days, the article may be deleted by an administrator."

It appears that your deletion may be contrary to the ToS regarding deletions.

Would like to request a discussion to review and reverse this decision.

Thank you in advance. Santavez (talk) 22:40, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

 Restored per PROD. MBisanz talk 15:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Next Limit Technologies page

Hi, I noticed that the article about Next Limit Technologies was deleted - stating "proposed deletion". Could you please put the page back up? It states that one of the contributors has a name that indicated a conflict of interest - I'm not sure who that contributor was? I went over the page a while ago and it was not being used for promotion of products, advertising, or anything of the kind - it was used solely as a source of information, based on facts. Thanks for your help.

213.0.127.234 (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

 Restored per PROD. MBisanz talk 18:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Joyce McKinney

I had a request to recreate this as a redirect to Mormon sex in chains case, and did so. I only noticed now (on checking the protection log) that there was an OTRS ticket involved, Ticket:2008070210015435. I don't have access to the queue that ticket's in, but if it seems from the context of the ticket that the page should not even exist as a redirect, please redelete it. Stifle (talk) 09:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Athens, GA

You recently deleted the page "Mordor (Athens)" citing the reason "such a "neighborhood" simply doesn't exist.." Such a neighborhood does in fact exist. It is larger and older than Boulevard, Newtown, and Cobbham, each of which are listed under the "Neighborhoods" section of the Athens, GA article. I have more explicitly detailed the borders of this neighborhood in the updated version of the article. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wmw0122 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your outstanding work and great attitude! Pattont/c 21:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Simona McIntyre

I would like to ask you to restore the page on model Simona McIntyre as the grounds on which the page was deleted are questionable. Reasons for deletion included a statement saying that no external links showed magazine covers when in fact a link to McIntyre's New York Magazine profile clearly states her work with Japanese Vogue (she was on the beauty cover) in January 2009, work with notable fashion magazines such as i-D, Numero, Nylon, Flair, Elle and Amica as well as her work with prestigious photographers such as Ellen von Unwerth and Chadwick Tyler. McIntyre has also made notable runway appearances such as her continual placement at both Marc Jacobs and Marc by Marc Jacobs shows, Luella, Rodarte, Temperley London, Vera Wang, Zac Posen, Alexander McQueen, Jean Paul Gaultier, Yohji Yamamoto, Gianfranco Ferre among many, many others.
Thank you very much for your time,
ValiumKnight (talk) 03:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

List of pies

Hello, Rjd0060. I have a question regarding the pie article (list). Yesterday I just came across List of breads and List of cakes, so as a member of WP:FOOD, I want to develop those lists with images. So I created List of cookies and tried to List of pies, but the latter once existed but you requested for deletion. After the discussion, admin The undertow (talk · contribs) deleted it. However I got to know that the admin was banned for whatever reason, so I come here instead. If I re-create the list about pie, do you terribly mind it? You can peek the intended article on my user page and List of cookies. I think this list can be interesting to foodies and readers. I look forward to your opinion. Thanks.--Caspian blue 20:34, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I go ahead to create it. --Caspian blue 20:40, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


Dustin Yellin

Hey there RJd0060 -- I created the Dustin Yellin article about a year ago and let it slip into a precarious state. Since I want this page to be part of wikipedia, I am willing to provide better citations about said. Unfortunately, I do not have access to the deleted pages and would prefer to work from the original. Are you an admin? Please help me by either reinstating the page or sending me a copy of the original page. There are plenty of references in widely distributed publications and even more web references to Dustin Yellin and his artwork. Mdomino (talk) 21:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Eliot Stein

Hi, I see you deleted this article per an OTRS request. Given that the individual in question appears to meet WP:BIO, it makes more sense to send this through a normal AfD with a note that the individual has requested deletion. JoshuaZ (talk) 01:56, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Would it be helpful to continue this over email? Because right now, I'm having a lot of trouble seeing what could possibly justify not having an article on this guy other than that. JoshuaZ (talk) 02:21, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Ok. If it is ok with you I'll email you a draft version before posting a recreating version so you can let me know if there's any terribly OTRSy issues about that draft. JoshuaZ (talk) 02:36, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
No. That's fine. I trust you. Expect to get an email from me sometime in the next 24 hours or so. JoshuaZ (talk) 02:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Swoopo

Hi, Daniel said I should address my questions to you. They're at his talk page, but I can rewrite them here if you want. NJGW (talk) 15:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

On the photographs of the Amir Nezam House and the Behnam House

Thank you for restoring the above-mentioned photographs. It seems that for some reason "Amir_Nezam_House-Interior_2.jpg " has not been restored. --BF 10:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your prompt response. In believe that Ms Sosan Jafari has simply mistakenly not referred to "Amir_Nezam_House-Interior_2.jpg" in her e-mail; if you consider all the images, there is no logical explanation why she should not have donated this particular image to Wikipedia. May I therefore hereby request you that you kindly remind her of this issue? Kind regards, --BF 14:12, 14 March 2009 (UTC).
Many thanks! --BF 14:18, 14 March 2009 (UTC).

Charles Nissen artist

Hello, I am the artist Charles Nissen and I noticed That an acticle about me was resently deleted. I understand why, but I was wondering if there is a back up copy or something that you could email to me. I would like to know what people are writing about me and if possible the username of the author of the article.

Charlesnissen (talk) 06:45, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Google listed the page as "Charles Nissen artist" and the link lead to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Nissen_artist, so I guess that was the title. Thanks for your help with this.

Charlesnissen (talk) 03:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Bestofmed

Hi, I've reduced it to what hopefully is a compromise. I suppose the reason it was 48 hours was because it appeared that he almost directly ignored my warning to him to not edit war. As for the 24/31 hour difference, it is my general experience that 31 hours has become the norm for most edit warring blocks based on my observations over the years. Khoikhoi 02:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Newcastle United F.C.

Thanks for semi-protecting Newcastle United F.C.. It has been semi-protected before and IPs have been banned but vandalism is still common. What level of vandalism would be required to get it extended to the end of the season if it comes up again?Cptnono (talk) 07:04, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Sound good. Thanks.Cptnono (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Anne Spencer copyright

if the original work was published before 1923, it's public domain. [3] do i need to assert that? pohick (talk) 00:55, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

very well, i will go visit the library of congress copyright office. since the renewals are paper records, i take it you will accept my witness, of what the records say. preliminary: Negro Poets probably PD; American poetry since 1900 probably PD; The New Negro probably PD; Caroling Dusk probably copyright; Poetry of the Negro, probably copyright. Crisis, probably PD. pohick (talk) 01:43, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Frank Duff (writer)

Hi, just noticed that the Frank Duff (writer) page has been deleted with the given reason that all of the author's work is self-published and the reviews self-submitted. I've met Mr. Duff and I know that his work has been published in print magazines including Wired (magazine) and his novella Lysergically Yours was not self-published, it was published by now defunct Insurgent Productions (Toronto) with which I used to be involved when it was still solvent. And though I don't know for a fact, I'm pretty sure that those reviews were independent. Anyway, I know this qualifies as original research, but nonetheless, just thought you know that the given reason for deletion is inaccurate and, if nothing else, the delete notice should probably be changed so as not to misrepresent his professional work to anyone who might find their way to the page.

Addendum: Noticed that the Lysergically Yours article was also deleted on the basis that it was a "self-published internet story with no reliable independent coverage." Just to be clear, Lysergically Yours was published comercially by brick and mortar imprint Insurgent Productions (Toronto) in two print editions, with the first print run having ISBN: 0-9734807-0-X. Again, whether or not the book is notable enough for Wikipedia is one thing, but the current page with the delete notice shows patently false information.

--68.63.86.57 (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleted fama

Hi I noticed you deleted the FAMA article earlier. I don't know who edited this or what the article looked like. But can you as an administrator try and restore the page. The group is definitely notable. I maybe able to contribute to continue where that user left off. Benjwong (talk) 04:11, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Ok thanks. Please give me some time before any source is added. Benjwong (talk) 04:18, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

How...?

...did you get Abuse Filter privileges? (If it's top secret, I understand ;-) ). Is that available to us other editors? Thanks for the info.! —Mr. E. Sánchez (that's me!)What I Do / What I Say 00:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Just looking out for you; glad it was nothing

We gotta watch each other's backs. (But I must admit, I'm a little concerned: I've only been vandalized once since Feb. 25; I must not be doing my job.) --Orange Mike | Talk 15:27, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Probably too much time blocking the spammernames in UAA and too little in the CSD and new-page patrol. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


orsc should not have been deleted. please put it back.

It's "notable", check google. It came in second right behind ICANN and contributed significantly to the evolution of the DNS. See also "Ruling the root" the book by Prof. Dr. Milton Mueller (Google books has excerpts). ORSC has been around for a decade and the DNS is still live. The current website, while small is fairly meaningles; archive.org has the historical data. ORSC was recognized by the US government and ICANN was told to consult with them; see their submissions on ntia.gov. If you put it back I'll fill in this historical gaps. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.246.2.10 (talk) 03:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Semi-protect on Lesley Visser

I noticed you handled the semi-protect on Lesley Visser. I haven't seen the page protection updated in the log though. Did the protection not go through, or will it update shortly? Thanks. Shadowjams (talk) 23:15, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Michael Brown (Liberal Democrats donor)

I'd agree it probably fails BLP1E - but that event in itself is clearly notable [4] [5] [6] [7] - so surely the page should have been moved, not deleted? -- LondonStatto (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. -- LondonStatto (talk) 15:39, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Mordor

Last month, you were persuaded to restore the deleted history of a newly-recreated article on a putative neighborhood of Athens, Georgia - an article which had been deleted on the grounds that no such neighborhood existed.

The guy who created the article both times supplied many external references to the neighborhood.

However, none of these references actually mention the alleged neighborhood. If you're presented with something so ridiculous as a neighborhood named Mordor, it's a good idea to actually check the alleged references. I've killed the article again; let it stay dead. DS (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Help

Hi there, i saw u were an admin and i would like to know if u could delete my account. Just message me back on my talk page before u actually do it. Im asking you cuz u seem like you know what ur doing the most, seeing as u are an admin. I do not want the account anymore and would like it removed. Also if u can't remove my account entirely, can u delete my user page? I want it when i edit a page and in history, for my name to appear red, as in no page. Thanks.

Bort08 22:29, 24 March 2009 (UTC) 

             Thank you

Bort08 22:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Ding!

I sent you email. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:58, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

I sent you another email. Kind of inefficient, but, if it works... -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:20, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Editprotect

Can you please tell me what you mean by this? [8] -- penubag  (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


My return

I would like my user page restored and my discussion too. Sorry it took so long for me to get back to you. - Afghan Historian (talk) 03:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey Dick

As a Toho Co. Ltd. shareholder, you couldn't block me even if you tried. Go ahead, delete it again. I hope you understand this well and I recommend you keep yourself as an anonymous user. Wikipedia is not recognized by academia or by me. And quite frankly, in life, your non-profit nonsense that hogs Google search will be dismissed. Now get a life and go block me again, loser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.70.240 (talk) 23:46, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

blocked user

User:Fangoriously has requested me to return the subpages of blocked user:PrincessKirlia. I really don't know what this means, but since you were involved with PrincessKirlia, can you figure out if Fangoriously is related to PrincessKirlia, and what the user wants. Jay (talk) 08:20, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Re:English Wikipedia Internal Account Creation Interface

I noticed that you declined my request for access. In your reason you said, "We must know that you are familiar with Wikipedia policies and one way of showing this is spending a few months working on the project." Is there another way that I can show that I am familiar with Wikipedia policies. Thanks. GT5162 (我的对话页) 12:36, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Blocking IP addresses

Although I disagree about the length of blocking single IP addresses, you're absolutely correct, that the rangeblock is potentially affecting too many people. I've unblocked it. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 02:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Contesting Prod

I want to contest this prod. WP:PROD says I should complain to you, then go to DRV if you don't restore it. I've never seen a contested PROD not speedily restored at DRV, so that policy may be out of date. WilyD 15:10, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

  • Thanks kindly. It'll no doubt end up at AFD, but almost every bilateral relations articles turns out to be notable. WilyD 15:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Beatty

Good AFD close on Chris Beatty. Sumoeagle179 (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

User talk:BetacommandBot

Is the large obnoxious talk header really necessary? I guess you could argue it had a place when the bot was editing, but it is blocked not not editing, so it just serves as a BITEy notice with no apparent purpose. Enigmamsg 19:01, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

It doesn't really matter to me, but if you look at the talk page history and several other places, the language clearly bothers people. It's not a polite helpful message. It's written in a very rude tone. I'm sure you would agree that it could be written in a better way (removing the obnoxious oversized image, not referring to anyone who edits the page as a "whiner", etc.). Perhaps it should be replaced with a general notice about image questions? I don't care about the banned notice. I just think that it's better not to bite newbies. Enigmamsg 19:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
If we were collaboratively editing the notice, my suggestions would be:
  1. Remove 14 and 15, which are unnecessarily obnoxious and rude. Try reading it from the perspective of an inexperienced user. They could easily be rewritten.
  2. Remove 11 as deliberately BITEy.
  3. Remove the stop hand, or at least make it smaller.
  4. Remove Betacommand's personal statements. "# I will not add rationales for you. As the uploader it is your responsibility NOT mine.# I do not want to see images deleted"
  5. Add punctuation which is sorely lacking.
I would do all these things, but I have an aversion to being reverted. Enigmamsg 19:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I will not add the banned notice. I will attempt to edit the notice to make it more neutral if you will back me up when MZMcBride reverts me. Enigmamsg 19:35, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

2009 NHL Entry Draft

The amount of vandalism in the prospect rankings section is starting to get annoying. What do you think about semi-protection until the Final Rankings have been released (which should be next week or so)? --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 11:43, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aitias

An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aitias/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Aitias/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, [[Sam Korn]] (smoddy) 22:06, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Gladstone Education

Why would you revert the edits? The article has been listed for copyright infringement, and the tag clearly states that it is not to be removed until an administrator has dealt with it.--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:29, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:30, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

The tragedy that has befallen Wikipedia

When I read his appeals to people to donate to the cause these days, I feel a sense of pity towards Jimmy Wales. The reason why is because I get the feeling that on an individual basis, he is a positive and altruistically minded individual, who genuinely wanted to create something which would be of value to the world.

Unfortunately, however, his site has become infested by an army of pedantic, pseudo-empiricist douchebags, to put it bluntly; and they are in danger of wrecking it more or less entirely. They largely already have; a number of said people don't exist here for any reason other than to revert material which others try to add. The line about this site being something which anybody can edit has become, in practice, a complete lie. If what you add to an article isn't approved of by one of the usual pedants, who can twist policy any way they like in order to justify their actions, it will be wordlessly deleted every time.

The most cowardly among such people never offer any concrete justification for their actions, either. Why bother to be accountable when you can simply cause any complaints which anyone levels at you to disappear?

Jimmy Wales, as much as I pity him, will also never receive a cent from me in response to any of his donation appeals. The only time I would remotely consider donating to the maintenance of this site, would be after someone seriously cleaned house; and I'm talking bans, and in large quantities. Most of the current administrative staff would be a good thing, and the deletion of the site's current policy would also be a fairly large step in the right direction, as well. Neutral Point of View, is to put it simply, a complete lie; as are most of the other elements of entirely subjective horse manure ("weasel words," things, "not sounding encyclopedic," things, "sounding like a magazine article." What on earth do any of these phrases mean? The answer is largely nothing, other than conveniently twistable, subjective justification for the earlier mentioned pedants to entirely arbitrarily delete something which they decide they don't like) that passes for this site's policy.

Your policy, and a very large part of the way you do things, is broken, Wikipedia; as is your inexcusable atheistic bias, and even worse, your attempts to pretend that said bias does not exist. In time, you will be replaced.

Revert this addition to your talk page, if you wish, or ban me for having made it. The one thing which I do not expect from anyone associated with this site, is any form of integrity.

EDIT:- I just discovered yet another example of material being arbitrarily removed from an article's talk page, simply because it expressed a statement which someone else decided they did not like.

I am going to continue to fight the continuing abuses of this site's stated policies until I am banned. I cannot tell you how overjoyed I also am at finding the talk page of one of this site's administrators, because it means that I finally have a relevant place to vent my frustrations. You are going to be hearing a lot more from me.

Petrus4 (talk) 16:52, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Kenneth S. Russell

You have erased an article about Kenneth S. Russell.

I am desperately looking for information about this man. If you can tell what was written in the article - I maybe can find more clues about where to find more information.

Regards! /Lavallen (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Cheers

That was quick. Darrenhusted (talk) 01:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


Didn't notice

Thanks for notifying me that I didn't notice. :) Miami33139 (talk) 01:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


Article content

You deleted article Comparison_of_student_information_systems but I actually was visiting it quite often. The content was very useful for me, can I access it somehow? Passive66 (talk) 11:27, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Yes, please email it to me Passive66 (talk) 14:48, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Oh, forgot that I turned it off. Now it's activated Passive66 (talk) 15:51, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

God Bless You and Thank You

Your powerful reasoning and sensibility has given me reason to smile to that end this day can I only say "Thank You!". Peace be with you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.91.204.240 (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Please Revert Deletion of Wilmington Drama League

The Wilmington Drama League is a non-profit community theater in Wilmington Delaware. I noticed that the reason given was "spam"

I assure you this is a beloved institution in Wilmington Delaware since 1933. Their Website, which was http://WDL.ORG was recently changed to http://wilmingtondramaleague.org, due to a larger organization with a lot more money pushing them around.

I was going to update the article and noticed that is was missing.

Spandox (talk) 21:08, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

{{Include-USGov}}

Hi, thanks for protecting the template. The template is relatively new --- the community may still wish to edit it. Can we have semi-protection instead of full protection? I think that's enough: we can still fully protect it in case of vandalism. Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Only one other editor than myself has even edited the meta-template: I don't want to be perceived as hacking up a template and then fully protecting it to avoid community input.
In any event, I'm not an admin: could you add a red (or silver) lock to the template article itself, to warn editors of the protected status? Thanks! —hike395 (talk) 15:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Obama

Hi. I just wanted to make sure you had seen my apology on Talk:Barack Obama. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 17:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Please revert a deletion of a Aleksandar Sørensen-Marković article

Aleksandar Sørensen-Marković is a licenced Danish PRO Ironman triathlete and has placed consistently in top 15 in highly competitive races. He is sponsored by Yakkay and Adidas. His personal sites are at www.pulsslag.dk and www.pulsslag.com. He was a member of Danish national team and is a member of several other competitive teams.

Danish article was deleted by mistake. I disagree with that deletion as well. He certainly needs to be documented in Wikipedia in both English and Danish. Why Danish admin decided to delete his page I am not sure, however I disagree and he ranks much higher than most triathletes and professional athletes who are already featured in Wikipedia.

You can also check my record on how many triathlon biographies and articles I published.

I hope you revert the deletion of Aleksandar Sørensen-Marković. NikolaT (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2009 (UTC)


Ain't Goin' Down (deleted article)

The song definitely exists: it's on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zOvzUH46nWM (though could be removed at any time since I don't think the user who posted it on YouTube has permission from copyright owners). Axl Rose's lead vocal is unmistakable, so it's reasonable to assume that the information that it is a Guns N' Roses song is correct, though any doubts about that part could be mentioned if the article is reinstated.Contains Mild Peril (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Josh Perry

I appreciate that you are trying to make Wikipedia a better place, but why did you delete the Josh Perry article. He is a very famous Youtube celebrity and actor whose name comes up multiple times on this site. I figured that an article about him would explain who he is and what he does for the Wikipedia reader. Sincerly: Zobango (talk) 00:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy Rjd0060/Archive 8's Day!

User:Rjd0060/Archive 8 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Rjd0060/Archive 8's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Rjd0060/Archive 8!

Peace,
Rlevse
~

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:18, 28 April 2009 (UTC)

RE: WSLK

The only reason I am removing the information is because the person says they can hear it in their car from such-and-such a point to such-and-such a point. That is original research.....if they had something to cite, it would be different. I live in Virginia and I can hear WCBS (AM) from my house, but I don't put in there that it can be heard in Virginia...cause that is OR. If they had something to cite, it would be different. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 00:19

OK....that is a little steep. Asking for my opinion and then threatening me with removing my rollbacker status. If they can cite it, then it should be allowed, but we can't and don't allow WP:OR unless there has been a change in policy that I missed. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 00:23
They provided what to OTRS? Can I see the OTRS ticket? - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 00:26
So, you want me to follow something on OTRS that I don't know what it is. Can you give me some idea of what is in the ticket? Because if it is he can hear it in his car, it is still WP:OR. Also, we can stop with the threats of taking me to ANI, that is not WP:AGF. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 00:30
What is the OTRS ticket number, I am going to see if I can't get someone to look it up for me and give me a half version of it. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 00:35
This isn't bite-y or anything, it is actually me being nice (if you can believe that)...but I want to know...are you happy? You did what Metros (Either Way) couldn't do...you got my TWINKLE and Rollback. You stood up for an article full of OR and punished someone for standing up to them. You told me about an OTRS not while things were going on, but after. You have also got me to seriously consider whether my time here is done or not. I personally have been bitter being around this place and today with this whole thing that was started by you, made that bitterness all that more evident. I hope you are happy....nicely done. - NeutralHomer • Talk • April 23, 2009 @ 01:33 01:33, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Various artists deletion

Thanks for carrying out the deletion. I just noticed Various Artists, a redirect from another capitalization, that should probably also be deleted (sorry I didn't notice it while the RfD was still open). Can that be deleted along with this, as housekeeping, or should I open another RfD? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. There are still a lot of incoming links to those (I think Ten Pound Hammer took care of the mainspace incoming links to the first Various artists redirect), so I'll try to deal with them sometime in the next couple days. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 17:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Miss Edgar's and Miss Cramp's School

I noticed that the "Miss Edgar's and Miss Cramp's School" entry was deleted by you back in June of 2008. I am the current archivist of the school and would like to add an entry for it to Wikipedia. I was wondering if there is an archived copy of the entry that was deleted, so I could at least see what was posted here previously that did not meet the Wiki standards. If there is none, it's no skin off my back, as I'll just create a new one, but it would be nice to see what was up here previously. Thanks.

Esheinfeld (talk) 17:16, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Wow, that's a pitiful entry. No wonder you deleted it. Thanks for forwarding me that info - I think I'll just create a new entry. Esheinfeld (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Mask

My mask is all sorted now (wikipedia/xeno) could you update my permissions for the chan? –xeno talk 14:02, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes its set (I'm not on right now maybe you are looking at the wrong xeno). xenocidic is my nickserv registered name. –xeno talk 14:13, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
No worries, my fault for failing to mention that. Thanks =) –xeno talk 14:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Silver Yoshi

Okay. Sorry, I'll fix it. It's just that u can do it on Mario Wiki. SilverYoshi95 —Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)


Revert a deletion of a person in the Norwegian Musical Encyclopedia.

Hi.

I would like to revert the deletion of this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bjarte_Ludvigsen

If you write Bjarte L in google or in Cuil you will see that his full name is one of the first that comes up. There are over a thousand direct hits on his name. I think it is kind of silly that a huge resource like Wiki will delete information about a person that is in the Norwegian Musical Encyclopedia. Is it possible to put it up again? - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluemusic (talk • contribs) 11:38, April 13, 2009 (UTC)

IRC cloak and admin channel

I think that I have received my wikipedia affiliated cloak. Could you re-add my permission for the admin channel? Thanks. Icestorm815 • Talk 23:52, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Heya, I've applied for a cloak today. Will I need to do anything once it goes through? Cheers, Nja247 14:49, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Re:Southside Playaz

Southside Playaz From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This page has been deleted. The deletion log for the page is provided below for reference. 00:07, 11 February 2009 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted "Southside Playaz" ‎ (Deleted because expired WP:PROD; Reason given: fails WP:MUS.)

Why was the page deleted.It was right for the most part. I'd Like to undo the deletion if possible.Hard to get info on underground rap associations like SSP.So we need it to be on Wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JOBE (talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Alan Hirsch

00:12, 23 October 2008 Rjd0060 (talk | contribs) deleted "Alan Hirsch" ‎ (Deleted because expired WP:PROD; Reason given: Non-notable speaker.)

I would request that the page for Alan Hirsch be restored. He is a Christian author, missional strategist, cultural architect, speaker, leadership trainer, and seminary professor. See http://agchurches.org/Sitefiles/Default/RSS/CMN/PDF/Multiplicity08/Alan%20Hirsch.pdf

Thanks! DaveDV (talk) 08:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Would it appropriate to start a new page? DaveDV (talk) 13:41, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Nisha Kataria

Where can I find the deletion discussion for the Nisha Kataria article? I would like to read it and have not been able to locate it despite searching for it. Thanks. Diderot's dreams (talk) 05:36, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

IRC cloak

Heya, it's been assigned. Cheers. Nja247 10:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Cloaked

Invite exemption, please :D It Is Me Here t / c 16:29, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Firefox AK

Why did you delete the Firefox AK page? I don't understand how this band could not be notable enough given all the worthless crap on wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.218.200.107 (talk) 14:55, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Given that you looked at the deletion log (in order to find out who deleted it) you should have seen a reason right there next to my username. Feel free to check again, and if you're going to leave comments like this, please don't call other users work "worthless crap" or anything like that. Also, sign your posts with four tildes ("~~~~"). Thanks. - Rjd0060 (talk) 14:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Syncplicity

I'm re-creating the article Syncplicity. Please read through and let me know if it's fine. As of now, I think it's a notable software. Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 06:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


User:Ridernyc has again requested for a speedy deletion. Can you please go through the article? Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 06:27, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


I've created a talk page.... Could you please discuss any relevant issues there? Thanks Mugunth(ping me!!!,contribs) 06:32, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Campbellgirl

I noticed that you reprimanded Campbellgirl for vandalism in 2007. I just wanted to point out that 1) she appears to me to be an employee of PRI (look at her talk page, she has been posting press releases verbatim as Wikipedia articles), 2) The Takeaway is a PRI program, and 3) she has been undoing my edits on The Takeaway page for the entire year that the program has been broadcast. I have addressed her on her talk page and I discussed her edits on The Takeaway's talk page but to no avail. I want more than dueling edits her, I can undo hers and she can undo mine but I really would like some kind of reprimand if she is promoting her economic interests with POV edits here. I have no axe to grind except that I live in the New York area and I listen to WNYC-FM a lot, and I think the program is kind of unworthy of WNYC's schedule.

By the way I also have talked with Chzz about this problem, FWIW. Affenbart (talk) 17:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Food Jammers

Hi, I noticed that you deleted Food Jammers for being non-notable, spammy, and violating WP:CRYSTAL. I started the original page and I don't think it was spammy. I certainly can't think of why it would be WP:CRYSTAL. Perhaps it changed, but I'd like to get it added again and clean it up. I believe that it is a notable show: http://www.tv-eh.com/2008/04/29/food-jammers-wins-gold/

AlexH (talk) 19:58, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of "The Master Key System"

Hi Rjd0060

I see that you deleted this article when a WP:PROD expired. The reason for deletion was "Chronic lack of reliable independent sources to establish notability and provide the foundation for a credible article" - though I cannot see whether that was _your_ reason or from the user that nominated for deletion.

As for notability, just do a google search. As for reliable sources, well, there may be problems with some of the material, but I'm sure that the most basic facts can be safely established from e.g. Library of Congress. In my opinion, it would be better to restore the article and then let people remove just the material that they find to be unreliable.

In any case, I find that the RfD procedure is better suited than PROD, for articles such as this one that a lot of work have gone into writing. Rune Kock (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the protection of my history! :) Rory (reply on my page!) (talk) 09:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Sasthamangalam

Rjd0060,

All info found on Sasthamangalam's page has been from proper channels and as told to this reporter by local folks. If you cannot digest it , I cannot help it. Remember - truth is always bitter and painful'". Think of the pain that the victim mentioned on that page is going through and then speak non sense. Only the person whose finger has been cut knows the pain, rest of the people surrounding hime can always say ooh and ouch easily. coloner nair —Preceding unsigned comment added by Coloner.nair (talk • contribs) 12:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

List of Monster Trucks

I recently removed from Blue Thunder a redlink to List of monster trucks as the list had been deleted. Today, I was cleaning up my watchlist and noticed that a link has been re-inserted to List of Monster Trucks. I have no experience of deletions, but it seems to me inappropriate that the latter should exist, owing to the capitalisation of the title and for the reasons given in the former's deletion. As you deleted the original list, can you give me any advice on whether I should take any action? I have connection or experience with monster trucks and only came across the Blue Thunder article by accident. --RexxS (talk) 17:46, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for restoring The Master Key System. Rune Kock (talk) 00:53, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Mayfair High School

Your edit at Talk:Mayfair High School was so helpful. Thanks for nothing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi

I'm User:Dominus Noster. You probably don't remember me but you blocked me from editing my talkpage. Evidently you've been talking to IllaZilla. I don't know what that guy's problem is but he's convinced that I'm the sockpuppet of a blocked user and he's had me blocked. I was using my talkpage to point out the obvious ridiculousness of this action. It is after all my talkpage, I can do what I want with it. Granted Wikipedia is getting more like a George Orwell novel every day but I'm not aware of any rules against freedom of speech on it so if you'd be so kind as to undo whatever you've done to prevent me from editing my talkpage I'd be very greatful. Good day. --86.130.137.175 (talk) 20:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Next Generation Mobile Networks Alliance

Hi I;d like some help with starting an article for this independent organisation, but everytime I put something up it gets marked for deletion. i have also submitted a request for an article to be started but haven't heard anything back from wikipedia. Can you help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sbedwell (talk • contribs) 09:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Joe jobbing put-in-bay.com

I think our Edgewater Hotel spammer (see MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist/archives/June 2009#Putinbayonline.com spam) is trying to bait us into blacklisting put-in-bay.com -- that's a Chamber of Commerce domain, not one of his. Certainly his edit summaries seem calculated to goad us into this; see Special:Contributions/65.43.193.9. This behaviour even has a name; it's known as a "Joe job".

I suggest that when he turns back up again with a new IP to spam a Chamber of Commerce link you just let the link stand and ignore him.

I blacklisted every Edgewater-related domain that I could find but I suspect our spammer owns more; I'll be happy to blacklist new ones as they reappear. Just list them at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist with a link to the June archive section above. If you're unsure as to the domain's ownership, let me know and I'll check them. I spent several hours researching the various domains and business relationships associated with our earlier Put-in-Bay spam and I kept those notes. User:A. B. (talk) 21:05, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Oliver Cleary

Hi there, The article about Oliver Cleary was recently deleted. I saw that the reason was because of lack of notability and "other concerns" which were attached to a link that I couldn't view. I believe Cleary is notable enough for wikipedia and supplied plenty of sources. Is there someway the page could be restored? If so I will happily add more information and sources. I'm new to wikipedia but I believe I can bring the article up to proper standards if given a chance. Thanks Jude22 (talk) 17:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC) 17:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Thomas Kyte

Hello, I saw that you deleted this article, because it was 'lacking third-party sources establishing notability' and WP:PROD expired. I think Thomas Kyte is notable and I would like to add the required third-party sources to the article. Could you recreate the article in my user namespace so I can work on it and bring it up to standard for main namespace? That would be great. Thank you. --Berny68 (talk) 06:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Spider-man 4

Hey dude, I was wondering if you could remove that block you put on the Spider-man 4 page. I looked at the history and realized that the edit war that occurred on that article was pointless and caused by careless mistakes and arrogant users.

I am going to repair the article by adding citations and removing all information that hasn't been proven yet. If you could please remove that block you put on, I promise you these changes in at least a weeks time.

So please, I ask of you, remove that editing block. I know that there was so much bickering, and I am sad to say, I was a main contender in it to. I see that it ends next Monday, but if you could, remove it so I can improve the article and end the editing war that has been going on for quite some time. --Red Slayer 01:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Tararam

Hi, I recently created a new stub for Tararam. I notice from the logs, a previous version existed, and was PROD'd, and deleted by you. If the deleted version is on the same topic (a music/dance group) and it's not an apparent copyvio, please consider undeleting it to history, so I can see if there's anything of value. Thank you. --Rob (talk) 15:35, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the fast response. --Rob (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Asking for a phone number

Can you point me to the policy that outlaws this please. Thanks! As to your comment about my comment regarding stalking and user Collect, you are not aware of the history. The comment was completely accurate. ► RATEL ◄ 01:15, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Disturbing comment

Given the growing creepiness of the conversations on other pages, I'm having a hard time seeing Emely1219's comment as anything other than a veiled warning or a threat whether or not it was actually intended for me. Flowanda | Talk 03:24, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks...that's what I needed to hear. Flowanda | Talk 06:09, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


Template

See User talk:Wehwalt#Template:Infobox MLB player again. Thanks. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here @ 19:32, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

La Conecta Band Page

Hi, I just read the deletion description for my La Conecta page. I fully agree with the terms of this deletion, since I wasn't even aware of the rule by the time I wrote this page.

Fact is, I didn't save my text.

Is there a way for me to get it back, so I can modify it, in accord to the Rules of wikipedia?

Along with my shameless self-promotion in this page, I wrote some useful information about my band that I actually don't have anymore since the deletion.

Thank you in advance

--Makhnovitch (talk) 16:07, 17 June 2009 (UTC)


DONE thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Makhnovitch (talk • contribs) 20:22, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Universum Box-Promotion

Can you please reinstate this article and I will improve it.--Vintagekits (talk) 11:23, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rjd0060/Archive_8&oldid=1147940903"