User talk:Borteddd

This template should help:

Welcome!

Hello, Borteddd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. --VViking_TalkEdits 14:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Viewmont Viking: i know, i also wrote on your talk page, i asked you to undo that action so that i can add sources. thanks! Borteddd (talk) 14:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

All the information is in the page history you do not need me to undo it. VViking_TalkEdits 14:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Viewmont Viking: i added sources, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mic Scrauso

The article Mic Scrauso has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable event.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 16:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Discospinster: ok, I improved the page Mic Scrauso, it's okay now? Borteddd (talk) 18:01, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Nerone (rapper) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nerone (rapper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

@Discospinster: i added sources, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 17:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

OK it is better now. ... discospinster _talk 17:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

2TheBeat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2TheBeat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 20:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@Akhiljaxxn: i edited the page, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 20:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2TheBeat (January 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2TheBeat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2TheBeat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Borteddd! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 20:59, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

@AngusWOOF: it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 00:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Nitro (rapper) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nitro (rapper), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 15:35, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: i added sources and exteranl links, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 17:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello Borteddd. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Borteddd. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Borteddd|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 16:09, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: no, I don't get paid by anyone to edit the articles, i just want to create them beacause i like hip hop and music Borteddd (talk) 17:04, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Can you please exlpain how the images are your own work then? CUPIDICAE💕 17:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: i made a mistake, i just wanted to publish them. Borteddd (talk) 17:25, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michele Capobianco

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michele Capobianco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – DarkGlow (contribs • talk) 15:06, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Alberto Izzo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alberto Izzo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alberto Izzo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

MB 22:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from COVID-19 pandemic in Italy into Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied or moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 12:20, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

@Diannaa: ok, i will do it in the future Borteddd (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Rione Antignano moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rione Antignano, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 11:07, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: i improved it, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 13:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, Borteddd. That's fine now. I've moved it back to mainspace. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 13:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: Thank you, can you also check Draft:Nitro (rapper) and Draft:2TheBeat? Thanks.

Agriculture in Italy moved to draftspace

This is almost completely unsourced. As in, it's not missing references for a few statements, it's missing references for 99% of all text. Please don't put this into mainspace until basic sourcing requirements are met. The text is now located at Draft:Agriculture in Italy. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Elmidae: added sources, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 14:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Deleted notice from Ovinus

I'm so sorry, I warned and reverted you instead of the user who made the problematic edits. I hope you aren't discouraged, I just conflated the two edits. Thank you. Ovinus (talk) 02:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

no worry Borteddd (talk) 13:33, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

2TheBeat moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2TheBeat, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2TheBeat (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2TheBeat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2TheBeat, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:17, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Principle of typicality moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Principle of typicality, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 13:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

@John B123: i improved it, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Borteddd, that looks fine now. I've moved the article back to mainspace. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 16:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Secondigliano tragedy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Secondigliano tragedy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Facebook is never a reliable source (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 04:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@DGG: ok, i improved it, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 07:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The problem here is NOT NEWS. WP certainly includes current events of lasting importance, but not incidental natural disasters or homicides or accidents. Rgw key criterion is the permanent importance suitable for an Wikipedian , which needs ti. be shown eitehr by discussion over w wide area dore many years, or such intense coverage at the start that the later coverage can be assumed. The most likely continuing notability is that the construction of tthe work was stopped and not resumed, at least as far as 2019. This is unususakm nad there might be more literature on that decision. Adding the names of the individual victims is considered inappropriate--the rule is NOT MEMORIAL. DGG ( talk ) 10:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secondigliano tragedy (February 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Secondigliano tragedy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Secondigliano tragedy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: i re-submitted it, it's suitable now? Borteddd (talk) 09:19, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Tecniche Perfette moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tecniche Perfette, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Onel5969: i added sources, it's ok now? Borteddd (talk) 19:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Naples at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:41, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Secondigliano tragedy has been accepted

Secondigliano tragedy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:47, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Napoli Film Festival moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Napoli Film Festival, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Rione Alto (Naples Metro) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rione Alto (Naples Metro), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:50, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Piazza Ferdinando Fuga moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Piazza Ferdinando Fuga, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:00, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rione Alto (Naples Metro) has been accepted

Rione Alto (Naples Metro), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 20:20, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Painting in Naples

A tag has been placed on Category:Painting in Naples requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2TheBeat

The article 2TheBeat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional article about an event which does not meet WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:32, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Nintendo Network into Miiverse. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 15:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Diannaa: i arleady did it when i created it, see the talk page. Borteddd (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Adding a template to the talk page is optional; the special edit summary is compulsory. Thanks,— Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

@Diannaa: This happened again with Mii Channel, an undiscussed split that's been challenged and reverted. -- ferret (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Stadio San Paolo

There was a move discussion at Talk:Stadio San Paolo#Requested move 4 December 2020 about whether to move it, and consensus was no. Please don't unilaterally move articles against established consensuses. If you really want it moved, you could start a new move request, however unless you can demonstrate that it is the clear WP:COMMONNAME (rather than just being the WP:OFFICIALNAME), then the move request will probably be rejected again. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

"Zyz, Italy" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Zyz, Italy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 20#Zyz, Italy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 20:04, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Geography of Campania

Hello, Borteddd,

Thank you for creating Geography of Campania.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add WP:RELIABLE sources as references in the article per WP:CITE norms.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Amkgp}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

— Amkgp 💬 18:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Fanpage.it moved to draftspace

Please see log comments. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 21:41, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Naples

Borteddd, are you still interested in pursuing this DYK nomination? You have still not finished the nomination process, which cannot proceed until you have added the nomination to the WP:DYKN page by including the complete page name in braces under the appropriate date (February 5, the day you created the article). There are instructions further up on this page in the Incomplete DYK nomination section. You will also need to come up with a more interesting hook; a large and curious history that can interest someone is not interesting; you need to find an interesting fact or juxtaposition to highlight.

If you need help in completing the nomination, I'll be happy to pitch in. If you're no longer interested, I can arrange to have the nomination page deleted. Please let me know how you'd like to proceed. Thank you for your interest in DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:48, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

@BlueMoonset: hi, i am still interested and i need help to continue it. Borteddd (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Borteddd, the nomination has already been reviewed. You will want to go to the review (linked above) and respond to the reviewer. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Napolitude moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Napolitude, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. The current single source does not verify most of the article.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:47, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Coat of arms of Naples

Hello! Your submission of Coat of arms of Naples at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Borteddd. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Naples.
Message added 11:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, are you still intending on working on this nomination? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 14:59, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Please return to the nomination and make the necessary clarifications; the nomination may be closed as unsuccessful if this isn't done soon. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Coat of arms of Naples

On 13 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Coat of arms of Naples, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one legend on the origin of the coat of arms of Naples (pictured) claims that it alludes to the colors of the sun and moon cult practiced by the city's pre-Christian inhabitants? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coat of arms of Naples. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Coat of arms of Naples), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Escape from Heart

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Escape from Heart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Escape from Heart moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Escape from Heart, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Gemitaiz has been nominated for deletion

Category:Gemitaiz has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:14, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gemitaiz EPs

A tag has been placed on Category:Gemitaiz EPs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gemitaiz mixtapes

A tag has been placed on Category:Gemitaiz mixtapes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hell Raton

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hell Raton requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.lestanzedellamusica.org/hffq8zut/e13fea-enigma-machete-crew. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:48, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Giovanni Pascale hospital moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Giovanni Pascale hospital, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:44, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

DJ Double S moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DJ Double S, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:11, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Russell Westbrook, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Links are generally not repeated per MOS:REPEATLINK. —Bagumba (talk) 09:55, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Double S (May 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Double S and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DJ Double S, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giovanni Pascale hospital (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giovanni Pascale hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Giovanni Pascale hospital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 11:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Endemol Shine Italy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Endemol Shine Italy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, I'm Bagumba. Your recent edit to the page Russell Westbrook‎ appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Bagumba (talk) 09:09, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Napolitude

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Napolitude, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Napolitude

Hello, Borteddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Napolitude".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Escape from Heart

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Escape from Heart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:DJ Double S

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DJ Double S, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Escape from Heart

Hello, Borteddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Escape from Heart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:21, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Giovanni Pascale hospital

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giovanni Pascale hospital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Endemol Shine Italy

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Endemol Shine Italy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Invented It moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Invented It, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources to establish notability. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kleuske (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

@Kleuske: i just added two other sources one of which is from HipHopDX, a notable source Borteddd (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Invented It (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Invented It and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Invented It, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 22:12, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Editing the GAN page...

There is no point in edits like this, any change you make to WP:GAN will be overwritten by Legobot. (t · c) buidhe 13:54, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Endemol Shine Italy

Hello, Borteddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Endemol Shine Italy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Invented It

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Invented It, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Sergio Grassi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sergio Grassi, is not suitable as written to remain published. Insufficiently referenced for a WP:BLP. Please add more references while in draft and once done contact and I will move back to mainspace. scope_creep^Talk 18:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Kruize Pinkins moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kruize Pinkins, is not suitable as written to remain published. The article is completly unsourced for a WP:BLP. Please add at least three WP:SECONDARY sources, not database profiles and give a shout when your finished. scope_creep^Talk 20:26, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

I added information and sources, moved it from a draft to an article --> Kruize Pinkins. Borteddd (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Simone Zanotti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Simone Zanotti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. that discuss the topic in detail. At the moment, the article is only a list of statistics and needs significant coverage of the player in writing . ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC) ‡ The Night Watch ω (talk) 05:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I added information and sources, moved it from a draft to an article --> Simone Zanotti. Borteddd (talk) 22:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Sirenuse to Il Gallo Lungo. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 04:38, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Ok, thank you: I'll look after to do it. Borteddd (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Piscinola Scampia station

Hello, Borteddd,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Piscinola Scampia station for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales ^Parley 20:46, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

@Joseywales1961: I know, i asked it to be deleted. I am currently creating the page for it tho. Borteddd (talk) 20:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Lorenzo Uglietti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lorenzo Uglietti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:42, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Aversa Ippodromo station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aversa Ippodromo station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Aversa Centro station moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aversa Centro station, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:41, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Sergio Grassi

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sergio Grassi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:57, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

LBA Next Gen Cup moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, LBA Next Gen Cup, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:22, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Borteddd. Thank you for your work on Divisione Nazionale A. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

this one goes to serie a2 instead of serie a

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lorenzo Uglietti

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lorenzo Uglietti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Sergio Grassi

Hello, Borteddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sergio Grassi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lorenzo Uglietti

Hello, Borteddd. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lorenzo Uglietti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aversa Ippodromo station

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aversa Ippodromo station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Aversa Centro station

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Aversa Centro station, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:LBA Next Gen Cup

Hello, Borteddd. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LBA Next Gen Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of British in Italy

The article British in Italy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not enough relevant information

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 April 2024 (UTC)