User talk:Dtt1/Archive 21

રાકેશ ઉપાધ્યાય

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page રાકેશ ઉપાધ્યાય to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. John B123 (talk) 08:56, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello

Seems like we did things the parallel, mind removing the CSD warning from my talk page since I draftified the article. Regards Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:30, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

• Synoman Barris I was just about to remove that notice from your talk page and wanted to ask you if i could copy your user page context What About Us I am a crazy jackson fan too. Thanks Dtt1 (talk) 11:35, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

  Dtt1,  Fixed, I don’t mind anyone copying my userpage at all. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:37, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

  Synoman Barris, Thanks.Dtt1 (talk) 11:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of David Britto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Britto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Britto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 09:26, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Mistake with deletion

Hi,

This is regarding the article Trumpler 27-1. You nominated this article for deletion because it 'didn't possess content', when it clearly does. This must have been a mistake. Please rethink your nomination, and if it helps, take another look at the article.

Thanks,

PNSMurthy (talk) 09:10, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

@PNSMurthy: was thinking about the same, thanks for confirming it, was going to revoke the nomination anyway.Dtt1^Talk 09:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Its okay, everyone makes mistakes:)PNSMurthy (talk) 09:14, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protea caespitosa (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Protea caespitosa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Protea caespitosa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Dtt1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:10, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

A1 tagging

Hello Dtt1, just wanted to leave you a message regarding a speedy deletion tag you placed on Dilstacks. According to the WP:A1 criterion, you shouldn't place the speedy deletion tag within a few minutes of the article being created. The creator might still be working on the article so it is best to give them some time to develop the article further. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- LuK3 (Talk) 13:39, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

LuK3 hey, I am aware of that, but sometime you know by watching the editor account and the style of editing that if they are doing some sensible editing or are just going for a test page. This was among them. ThanksDtt1^Talk 13:44, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Richa Negi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richa Negi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richa Negi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Harsh (talk) 07:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of The Spindoctor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Spindoctor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spindoctor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMySon 16:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Ruturaj Singh

Dhanush sun mere bhai link vgera check krle sahi toh hai aur news coverage b hai toh kya dikkat hai delete krne mai Ruturaj Sinh vale page p yeh smj nhi arha mujhe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samer rizvi (talk • contribs) 19:30, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Kyu bol nhi skte? Dekhlo dhyan se link hai refrence k liye vo sahi hi hai galt nhi hai bro Samer rizvi (talk) 08:48, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Title

Hello, thank you for your change. The style of the title caught my attention, I'm glad you like it: D --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 17:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Dicayes Hey is that style yours? I mean you have the copyright to it? I won't mind giving the credit :) Thanks Dtt1^Talk 20:48, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Dtt1 Hahah it's not a problem man, I'm kidding: D --𝘋𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘺𝘦𝘴 ϟ ^Heyyo? 10:21, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion removal

Please don't remove speedy deletion tags on articles you've created as you did at Qyuki Digital Media. I agree with you it does not qualify for speedy deletion given its two clearly notable co-founders but if you want to contest a speedy deletion on an article you've created the proper way is to use the blue button not to just remove the tag. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:02, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: July 2020 bitcoin scam

Hello Dtt1, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of July 2020 bitcoin scam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:11, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello GeneralNotability thanks for the suggestion, but would you mind checking this page too which just got created? 2020 Twitter Bitcoin scam, Both are about the same thing. I have also raised a request here though Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Naypta Thanks Dtt1^Talk 22:14, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Dtt1, the other article has sufficient context to not be A3-eligible, and that wasn't sockpuppetry. GeneralNotability (talk) 22:18, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

GeneralNotability Yeah that is why I contributed in the one which looked ok and was asking this to be deleted, Although thanks for checking out the sockpuppetry case too. Dtt1^Talk 22:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

• Hello Dtt1, you dropped a final warning for vandalism to an editor who does not appear to be one. Which edit was it about? I am also concerned that you CSDed their article within 5 minutes of creation when it was obviously a work in progress (and did not have any problematic content that needed to be immediately purged). Please give articles time to develop before you tag them. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 05:14, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello Usedtobecool actually as he has created the page Jeetu Nepal at first it seemed to be a Csd case and he was removing the csd tag instead of improving the page, then i placed the warning tag on his talk page later when i searches for the subject more I felt like the page doesn't deserve a CSD so I did withdraw the csd and improvised the page. as you can check this in the History of the page. Thanks. --Dtt1^Talk 08:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Removing a CSD template is not vandalism; notice how Barkeep49 did not drop you a level 5 vandalism warning in the section below this one? If you can't find the right template, you should use a custom message, a personal custom message is more friendly almost always, in any case. I'd advise you to revert yourself. The user is in an impossible situation without your help. Leaving the message as is gives everyone the impression that they were an egregious vandal who almost got blocked for it, removing it themself would be seen as an attempt to hide the record of their wrongdoing. Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

And, as I said in my last message, please give articles time to develop before you tag them for deletion; you could wait 20-30 mins or review the creator's contributions to see whether they have moved on to doing something else or have made no further edits suggesting they might still be working on the next substantial edit to the same article. Regards! Usedtobecool ☎️ 20:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks!

	My favorite Wikipedian
	Thank you! You have told me that my article was up for Speedy Deletion! This may not sound good, but I'm glad you told me. imissedu 13:02, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lakes in Udaipur

A tag has been placed on Category:Lakes in Udaipur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This message was automatically delivered by QEDKbot. 09:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Jiten Mukhi

Bro Dhanush, I agree with the imbd references not meeting general notability but you have afded the article too sooner, I was improving the article with independent sources Fisha Malik (talk) 11:36, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Fisha Malik That is why i added it to AFD cuz in case it does have sufficient coverage willing editors will get the chance to improve it, No worries with that Fisha ji, please continue to Improve the article, If you feel it does have sufficient Coverage please add them, the AFD will not Harm the page if it meets the GNG . Thanks --Dtt1^Talk 11:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

I have added sources, this guy's films are specially listed on Box office of India's website in a special page dadicated to him so making him notable, hope this might be the case of Speedy keepFisha Malik (talk) 12:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Quick note on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jiten Mukhi

Thanks for your recent contributions in performing deletion sorting. Please note that regarding the Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People page, it states, "Note: In most cases there is another, more specific category than this one. If possible, please use one of these instead". Just a heads up so that you are aware. Cheers Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 13:17, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@Synoman Barris: hey thank you so much for letting me know about that, will have a look at this. Thanks --Dtt1^Talk 16:25, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Hilal Ahmed Rather for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hilal Ahmed Rather is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hilal Ahmed Rather until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   // Timothy :: talk  04:50, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Copyright violation

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Draft:Parmish Verma article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement: "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike".

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the Help Desk. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 10:37, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: I really appreciate your effort of trying to teach me things regarding wikipedia Copyrights, But as I see in the above message that I used Copied statement!! Please enlighten me with what exactly you found copied, as I had completely written the whole draft on my own, so knowing the exact fault will help me in future, Thanks. --Dtt1^Talk 10:42, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

You used File:Singham 2019 Film.jpg, which is a non-free image, to depict the person. That's not permitted. It's okay to use it for Singham (2019 film) because there's no possibility of a freely-licensed image there, and because there's a detailed fair-use rationale. But you can't use it to depict a living person. The article itself was deleted for reasons unrelated to the copyright violation but on further inspection, that was probably a mistake so I will restore it in a few minutes, though without the copyright violation. --Yamla (talk) 10:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: Ohh I really didn't Knew about that, I thought as its used in that movie page so I can use it. Thanks for letting me know about it, Please can you also redirect me to some instruction where I can be able to understand wikipedia Commons terms, as which picture can be used where, I am willing to learn a bit about that, Rest Thank You for the restoration of the Draft, Also If you can check if its ok enough to be in the mainspace, you can move it, Thanks --Dtt1^Talk 10:52, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:FAIRUSE and WP:COPYRIGHT are the places to start. This is one of the most complicated sections of Wikipedia, though. :) --Yamla (talk) 11:19, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

WP:BLP

you moved this back into mainspace without adequately following WP:BLP. Can you please provide the source for the personal life, like his birth date that you left in when you threw it back into mainspace haphazardly? Praxidicae (talk) 15:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Praxidicae Ohh my mistake, will keep that in mind now, Thanks --Dtt1^Talk 16:20, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sapna Choudhary (August 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sapna Choudhary and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sapna Choudhary, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sapna Choudhary has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sapna Choudhary. Thanks! - FitIndia ^{Talk Admin on Commons} 14:26, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

edit conflicts

Not really :) but did we discover the lack of an article for Yoann Bourgeois at the exact same moment? Does that mean you also read Kottke? tedder (talk) 18:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Tedder: haha I guess yeah, the timing was exact, yeah I do read Kottke :)) and glad to see that you read it too :). Thanks Dtt1^Talk 18:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Great. I appreciate your help- I was annoyed there wasn't even an English-language stub. tedder (talk) 18:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

@Tedder: Thank You for the appreciation you are the very first admin I came across who isn't biting lol! thanks for the generosity, suggesting to create the stub or getting the particular section of stub created on french dancers will really be helpful. Dtt1^Talk 18:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Priyadarshini Patwa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Priyadarshini Patwa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 03:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yasir Akhtar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abid Ali. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Prakriti Malla

The article Prakriti Malla has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

too trivial for an encyclopedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 05:21, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello there @DGG: thanks for the nomination and the suggestion of the page Prakriti Malla, As I researched more and have added enough secondary reliable sources to it which I think have pushed the parameter above from just being trivial so I think it passes GNG, Thus I am very tempted to contest the deletion and remove the tag, But I would love if you can have a look to the page and if still you feel that it should be deleted, Mind AFDing the page instead of Prod?? as having the discussion accordingly on the sources available will do more justice to it, Thanks Dtt1^Talk 12:51, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Prakriti Malla for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prakriti Malla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prakriti Malla until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92^Talk 03:03, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

DJ Felix Discussion

Hello Dear Dhanush I know you created DJ Felix and other pages I want to talk to regarding wikipages I'm Yuvraj Raghuvanshi and I work for Indian television industry Please contact with me on 9627788776 Email- yuvrajraghuvanshiofficial@gmail.com

Please contact as soon as possible Thank You Yuvrajraghuvanshiofficial (talk) 00:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Yuvrajraghuvanshiofficial: yes I am a wikipedian so I do create pages and add them in deletion process too, well we can talk anything you want over here, since this is the right place to talk :) Thanks.Dtt1^Talk 00:45, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of DJ Felix

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DJ Felix requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bencemac (talk) 06:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of DJ Felix for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJ Felix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ Felix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bencemac (talk) 09:47, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Warm Regards, ZI Jony ^(Talk) 10:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

August 26, page Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia

Hello there, I found that recently you moved your own created page draft page to mainspace which was moved to draft by someone else. If it really meets to be in mainspace, please leave the to the authorizes. And I found that you are an authorized one, especially it is your own page. I moving the page back to draft or if you disagree, I will have to nominate the page for deletion. Thanks. ~ A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 11:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 11:11, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Himmata Ram Bhambhu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Himmata Ram Bhambhu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A. Shohag (ping_me||Talk) 11:25, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Himmata Ram Bhambhu for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Himmata Ram Bhambhu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himmata Ram Bhambhu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zoodino (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Books by Rabindranath Tagore

A tag has been placed on Category:Books by Rabindranath Tagore requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Please Edit Draft:R Nait

Hello, I saw your contribution to the article Parmish Verma. And it seems to me that you have a good knowledge of writing articles for Punjabi singers. For this, I request you to contribute to your Draft:R Nait article. Please create the article. You will find the sources on Google as required in the article. I hope you

223.238.207.24 (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khushi Shah (September 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Khushi Shah and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Khushi Shah, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:25, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Your CSD nomination of Indian meena club

Hello I just wanted to let you know I contested your CSD:A10 because that CSD criteria if meant for articles in the main space of Wikipedia since you were comparing it to the draft space A10 would not apply. If you feel there is any other reason for deletion please feel free to re-apply an applicable criteria or nominate it through WP:AFD. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:39, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Drew House (clothing line) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Drew House (clothing line), does not have enough information as written to remain published. It says only that the company exists. Notability is not inherited from Justin Bieber or anyone else. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia).

This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.

Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.

I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ImSonyR9. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- RoySmith (talk) 13:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toranj Kayvon (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toranj Kayvon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Toranj Kayvon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Florence Berthout

The article Florence Berthout has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Possibly move to draft?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Qyuki Digital Media

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Qyuki Digital Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://english.lokmat.com/topics/qyuki-digital-media-private-limited/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:24, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

Toranj Kayvon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Toranj Kayvon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:27, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Toranj Kayvon has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Toranj Kayvon. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:07, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Toranj Kayvon (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toranj Kayvon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Toranj Kayvon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Rohan Solomon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rohan Solomon, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ravensfire (talk) 16:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohan Solomon (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rohan Solomon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rohan Solomon, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:19, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Courtesy notification

Hey, this is a courtesy notification that I've created a deletion discussion for Rohanpreet Singh. The sources don't appear to be in-depth to meet notability requirements and I think this is just WP:TOOSOON for an article. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 18:02, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Babloo Srivastava for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babloo Srivastava is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babloo Srivastava (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Amkgp 💬 06:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dtt1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Is it considerable as a reliable source ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Dtt1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need Help, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Srilankan Armed Force Commanders

A tag has been placed on Category:Srilankan Armed Force Commanders requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia has been accepted

Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 04:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Appealing on the Nomination of Alex Chamwada for deletion

This is regarding the article Alex Chamwada. You nominated this article for deletion because it violated the Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have since redone the content again. Please rethink your nomination, and if it helps, take another look at the article. I am open to make more edits where necessary.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alimuiruri (talk • contribs) 07:54, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

@Alimuiruri: Thanks for your contribution on Alex Chamwada but as you can check on Here the reason for the deletion discussion is it seems to be lacking sufficient amount of sources which makes it enough notable to have a stand alone article on wikipedia, So in the discussion let other editors too decide weather it fits the criteria of notability or not, Thanks Dtt1^Talk 08:01, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Om Prakash Bhatt (producer)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Om Prakash Bhatt (producer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:20, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Om Prakash Bhatt (producer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Om Prakash Bhatt (producer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Om Prakash Bhatt (producer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohan Solomon

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Madhavedits (talk) 09:58, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohan Solomon (January 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Hatchens (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:DJ Radical Sista

Hello, Dtt1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DJ Radical Sista".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gafurbhai M. Bilakhia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RationalPuff (talk) 16:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Saira Peter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saira Peter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saira Peter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SpareSeiko (talk) 18:27, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Teach me your secrets!

A warm hello to you SpareSeiko! I couldn't help but notice a bouncing Wikipedia logo on your user page and I was immediately gripped with acute cupidity. I beg you to teach me the secret to this most mesmerizing thingy! It would make my day. Please be well! Joe (talk) 19:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Ashish Chanchlani

Under the circumstances, I would definitely create the draft in a sandbox or the draft space; trying to write in the main space will very likely have you colliding with new page patrollers or the like. WilyD 12:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

WilyD Thanks for the guidance, But the reason behind me approaching you was that even the draft space of Draft:Ashish Chanchlani is protected from creation and says This page is currently protected so that only administrators can create it., Thus I would Like to create it in the draft section, but I just saw that you lowered the protection level on Ashish Chanchlani too, so I wanted to know weather I shall create the article under Ashish Chanchlani or Draft:Ashish Chanchlani, Kindly Guide.

ThanksDtt1^Talk 04:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

ohh my bad, sorry just saw (DRV endorsed deletion, but decided re-creation attempts should be permissable - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2020_November_29#Ashish_Chanchlani) this Thanks, I am attempting to re-create it with your permission. Thanks againDtt1^Talk 04:14, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ashish Chanchlani

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ashish Chanchlani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CUPIDICAE💕 10:37, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ashish Chanchlani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashish Chanchlani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashish Chanchlani (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 17:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)