Jump to content

User talk:Jeffrey R. Clark/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5

NPWatcher

Hi, Jeffrey R. Clark. I have granted you NPWatcher per your request here. After looking over a few of your contributions, your talk page, and your block log, I feel you can be trusted with the tool. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. –Juliancolton | Talk 22:11, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Acc Request

I have Requested Acc rignts--Dcheagle (talk) 03:05, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeffrey R. Clark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

my account was hacked here is my hash code for confirmation that i am me. (I can Also be found at Xsonxfanx or by email at j-dunn07@hotmail.com)

Decline reason:

I've attempted to use "I can Also be found at Xsonxfanx or by email at j-dunn07@hotmail.com" to get the code on your userpage but couldn't get it to match up. You are not blocked, but if you are in control of your account again just change your password. \ Backslash Forwardslash / (talk) 22:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Jeffrey R. Clark (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message


Decline reason: If you are autoblocked, you need to actually include the code number of the autoblock. Admins cannot find the actual autoblock without it. Can you reproduce the error message you get when you try to edit? — Jayron32 05:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

is this what you need im try ing to get back but i cant cause my other account got hacked and the block is effecting this one and i cant get the other one back with out this one

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock #1567082 lifted or expired.

Request handled by:  —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 19:46, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 17:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

I have fully protected the user's talk and user pages and disabled the user's email function to prevent further disruption. I left the unblock email address on the talk page if he/she wants to appeal this block. Thanks for all you do, Willking1979 (talk) 01:26, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for reverting the vandal attack on may talk page. Soon afterwards, he slandered me again. I subsequently blocked the user. Willking1979 (talk) 15:19, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
No Problem just noticed it was there and took care of it.--Dcheagle (talk) 18:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Re: InnoVida

Dcheagle,

I was able to get in touch with someone at InnoVida via phone and they had me send an email formally requesting re-use of their published information for the InnoVida Wiki. I should get the response here shortly and will email it to the address listed on the copyright page for Wiki.

UPDATED: I received the permission letter from the CEO and sent it to permissions-en-at-wikimedia.org at 1:50pm GMT -5:00 2009.09.26.

Courtlandw (talk) 15:55, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Ok then we wait for Wiki to reply back in the mean time i have place the hold on tag to stop the Deltion process which will allow time for wiki to review the Letter good luck.--Dcheagle (talk) 17:56, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:09, 27 September 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Didn't apear to be constuctive?

I thought factual would be important. Note that in that thread MVP's little segment was noted to end in 2009 though he still does that same segment on Monday night Raw. Why did they make that change? Because in all likelihood MVP won't comeback to smackdown and host the MVP lounge.

Adam Copeland (EDGE) Legitimately injured himself. That information is widely available on the Internet as well as this website. He tore his Achilles tendon and He may never return to wrestling though if he does fully recover it won't be this year. There for his recurring segment is in fact is no longer current and will not be a recurring segment until he makes a full recovery and he infact does once again do the cutting edge. I can not say the cutting edge won't be a recurring segment in the future but I can say as of this moment it is no longer recurring so there for it should no longer be listed as such.

Now if you can get someone to constructively change The Cutting Edge so that it goes to show that it ended in 2009 and unbold everything (You know sort of exactly like I already did) people that actually care about the truth may benefit.

The only other thing I could add to the wwe smackdown page that would really be constructive would be a long thought out lie but I thought wikipedia was meant to be an encyclopedia with actual facts in it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.15.191.119 (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


RE

Okay, good.--WillC 22:29, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 14:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009

New sock case (same puppetier)

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/The abominable Wiki troll --UnquestionableTruth-- 01:29, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Reversions of name ordering

I really think you're misusing rollback here. Yeah, the edits should be reverted, but the guy simply seems to be ignorant of the rules. The edits are intended to be helpful, but they're just not. It's not clear vandalism, so I'd stop using rollback to revert him. Gavyn Sykes (talk) 02:47, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Jeff Hardy Reversion

Why did you take out my addition to Jeff Hardy's page? He was arrested for drug trafficking.

Dm23avg307 (talk) 19:23, 24 October 2009 (UTC) Dm23avg307

the reason why your addition was removed is because Jeff Hardy has not been convicted for Drug Trafficking if he is convicted we will added it.--Dcheagle (talk) 20:46, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 11:39, 25 October 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Mistake?

I'm assuming you accidentally hit the wrong button here, right?--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:45, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

You're incorrect per WP:ALT, alt text shouldn't mention the subject by name.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:55, 25 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009

barnstar

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
keep up the goodwork.----
thanks:)

Re: WWE TLC

No problem. I've just realised that this won't be too much of a problem to tackle, seeing as the real poster will probabily be released on Monday. --  Θakster   16:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Cheers. --  Θakster   20:58, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Survivor Series

It doesn't make any sense. The match can be added to the article provided that has been formalized at the official website. Those are the rules.Archibald Leitch (talk) 21:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually you're wrong. If the website has been formalized the match, it can be added to the article, TJ told me that, and i knew that too.Archibald Leitch (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
It doesn't make any excuses if SmackDown! has been aired in Australia, the show has made in the US, not in Australia. Archibald Leitch (talk) 21:07, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

OK, I'm just following the rules, you're doing something that is incorrect in Wikipedia, you're not waiting to the website and that is vandalism. Archibald Leitch (talk) 21:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 08:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009

Invitation to participate in SecurePoll feedback and workshop

As you participated in the recent Audit Subcommittee election, or in one of two requests for comment that relate to the use of SecurePoll for elections on this project, you are invited to participate in the SecurePoll feedback and workshop. Your comments, suggestions and observations are welcome.

For the Arbitration Committee,
Risker (talk) 08:06, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

CSD tagging

Hello; thank you for helping out patrolling new page creations but I have had to decline the speedy deletion of this article as there was nothing to suggest that it was promotional and it did not meet any of the other speedy deletion criteria. CIreland (talk) 07:08, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 13:07, 22 November 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 19:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009

test

test test test test test test test--Steam Iron 02:11, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 22:56, 20 December 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009


this is a test

dvevevcrfrecdsrvcvbrvecedevrevdevc--Steam Iron 01:26, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


Speedy deletion declined: 长久物流

Hello Dcheagle. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 长久物流, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G1 explicitly excludes material not in English. Thank you. SoWhy 10:55, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


Scatman

This is not actually an offensive name - scat is a type of jazz singing. Theresa Knott | token threats 12:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009


Forney's entry

Ok I made a section on the talk page. Now you explain how you see this single sentence as meriting a whole sub-section for Forney's entry.

"Forney is a prodominantly Christian city served by many churches such as First Baptist, Fellowship Baptist, St. Martins, East Side Church of Christ, Semilla de Vida, and many others."

Sovietsoldat (talk) 10:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)SovietSoldat