User talk:JennKR/Archive 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

British Spelling[edit]

Doh! I knew about some of the differences, but not that one! Thanks for catching it! Matt (talk) 06:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Beyonce[edit]

Pick and choose what parts of my comments you want to focus on, cuz that's what you do. --Aichik (talk) 19:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

What happened to the dispute your brought up at the Dispute Resolution Board? Was it resolved? (It's not there anymore. If you have access to their archives I'd love a link.) thanks--Aichik (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Mrs. Carter Show Box Office[edit]

Hello Jennie. First of all I want to say thank you for all you do for Beyonce's articles. Keep up the good work! Hmm, well I actually don't really know. This is the first tour article that I'm editing. I know that Billboard reports every concert by Lady Gaga, Madonna, Rihanna. But I think that maybe it will be updated. My love is love (talk) 18:46, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Haha[edit]

Well we had the same picture, so no wonder you confused. No problem btw xax :) — Tomíca(T2ME) 08:45, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Haha, do not worry. And for the box office, you should be patient and check constantly, really. I was so pissed off they didn't update the Diamonds World Tour scorebox during its course, they did it later for all the shows (when the tour finished). Cheers! — Tomíca(T2ME) 09:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, JennKR. You have new messages at Calvin999's talk page.
Message added 13:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 — AARONTALK 13:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

I really do not see how quoting song lyrics should count as original research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MackyBeth (talkcontribs) 13:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Legacy[edit]

What do you think about this? I kind of trimmed to the most important things and also added some important quotes. Would you be interested in helping me with it a bit? If you want you can edit in the sandbox [remove/add stuff] and then we gonna transfer it to the article. Cheers! — Tomíca(T2ME) 15:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

And? I see you didn't make an edit, it is that good :P lol — Tomíca(T2ME) 19:00, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Then we can name the section legacy and impact. I think that would go. And no, I don't think it should be included, because the song was not being notable both commercially and critically. It was there, but I removed it. — Tomíca(T2ME) 19:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I added the information about Spotify announcing she is the most streaming artist. I agree quotes are kind of useless (although it's nice to see some praise for your favorite ;]). And yeah I agree, I looked about her influence on EDM, however, I didn't find anything :/. — Tomíca(T2ME) 19:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Should I paste the sandbox in the article? Is it good already? — Tomíca(T2ME) 18:38, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Okey dokey :) ! — Tomíca(T2ME) 20:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Sorry Sorry Sorry[edit]

I am very sorry about this Jenny. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 11:26, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

I spent at least two days doing those tables on the discography page. Tables are really difficult to use. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:20, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I hope you know that two new snippets from "Standing on the Sun" surfaced online today. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 16:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
I don't know why but I don't enjoy GW. Maybe because it is too lengthy and obviously for women. :P Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Beyonce live vocals?[edit]

Greetings. How are you? Hey don't you think that the bio page puts too minimal emphasis on her live vocals given all the praise she receives for them? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

A lot has also been removed while trimming and copy-editing by someone whose name I won't take. :P Thanks for everything you do Jenny. You are a gem to that bio page. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

NZ certifications[edit]

I am on a break from university, but I head back in two weeks and the library has a copy of a book which I think has certifications. I'll add refs for CIL and BB certs then, if I find them. Until then, I can't think of any other source to back up the NZ certs, unfortunately... Adabow (talk) 08:54, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Illusive Man[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Illusive Man. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 00:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Fabula Nova Crystallis Final Fantasy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 01:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Hey there[edit]

JennKR, I'm not sure if we actually know each other or not - but you can took down my Oz site off the Wizard of Oz movie page. We do a lot of promoting of people in the oz community in regards to the wizard of oz and it is an amazing educational site for entertainment etc in regards to the 1939 movie. It is very successful, please explain to me further your issue as to why it just even being a fan site is a problem though. thanks im sure we can resolve this.Aaronpac1 (talk) 23:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Aaron


Got your other recent message....as in regards to -

"Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority..." I believe I am a recognized authority in this topic and or do you mean I need to have it posted by a recognized person within the Wikipedia community?

Please comment on Talk:The NeverEnding Story (film)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The NeverEnding Story (film). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 02:16, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, JennKR. You have new messages at Adabow's talk page.
Message added 21:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Adabow (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

uh, yeah...[edit]

This one's gonna take a while. Serendipodous 05:35, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Feedback Request[edit]

Hello, I got your name from this list.

Would you please get involved in the article Hog-dog rodeo. As you can read at the following links, Link1 Link2 Hog-Dog Fighting, Hog-Baiting, Hog-Dog Rodeos, Hog dogging, hawg dawgin and hog dog "rodeos" are synonyms for the exact same activity. This article should be moved to "Hog-baiting", so it is inline with the naming convention of the other articles in its classification here. Wikipedia defines Dog baiting as follows:

"setting game dogs against a chained or confined animal for sport. The dogs bite, and tear to subdue the opposing animal by incapacitating or killing it. Baiting is a blood sport used for entertainment and gambling."

This definition fits for Hog-Dog Rodeo, Hog-baiting, Hog-Dawging, or whatever name or idiom you want to call it. It is all the same activity. Please see the two citations I provided above for third-party confirmation. Just because some parts of the world do not call it illegal, does not mean is not Hog-baiting. It is all the same activity, it might be marketed and packaged differently, but it is still the same and fits into the definition of Dog-baiting. Currently, one editor Chrisrus does not like the term "Hog-baiting" and keeps reverting the article, even though I have provided strong third-party citations, he seems to be exerting article ownership and is not displaying a NPOV.

You can read our conversation on the article talk page and see the reverts of the article for the edited changes.

Thank you IQ125 (talk) 09:49, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Last of Us[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:The Last of Us. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series)[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Terra Nova (TV series). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 04:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Kim Possible characters[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Kim Possible characters. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 04:16, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Skyfall[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Skyfall. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 04:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Nicki Minaj discography[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Nicki Minaj discography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 05:16, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Second opinion for Lauryn Hill[edit]

I see that you've had to wait quite awhile for the second review for this article, so I've stepped in and offered some thoughts on the review page to help continue the process. WikiRedactor (talk) 20:15, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Beyoncé discography[edit]

Good work on Beyoncé Knowles discography (it was promoted to FL)! Just thought I'd let you know that there is a WikiProject at WP:BEY in case you were unaware; if you're ever in need of another project have a read through there. Well done again and happy editing. Adabow (talk) 10:27, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Editors Barnstar Hires.png The Editor's Barnstar
Congratulations on scoring your first featured list with Beyoncé Knowles discography. Keep up the great work and behaviour! — Tomíca(T2ME) 10:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Beyoncé Knowles discography[edit]

Congratulations on making Beyoncé Knowles discography a Featured List - the first ever for the WikiProject Beyoncé Knowles. Keep up the good work. My love is love (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Misha B Page Layout[edit]

Great improvement on the Page layout for this article. Thanks.Bodney (talk) 10:49, 13 August 2013 (UTC)


this is quite marvellous, puts things into musical respective http://techland.time.com/2013/08/09/like-a-nerdy-wind-chime-real-time-wikipedia-edits-set-to-music/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bodney (talkcontribs) 13:13, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Countdown[edit]

You've done a great job copy-editing this article. You can also nominate it for GA when you finish. I just wanted to tell you that all Beyoncé FAs and GAs (see "Single Ladies (Put a Ring on It)" and "Halo (Beyoncé Knowles song)) use publishers in the references. I know that during the nominations of those articles, editors always mentioned missing publishers in the references. Are you sure that publishers shouldn't be used in the references? My love is love (talk) 11:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Recently, on my "Diamonds" FAC, I was told that the publishers should be avoided in the references because of their repetition. Being in her older FAC's doesn't mean they could be used in the newer, because every article on Wikipedia tends to be different. :) Cheers! — Tomíca(T2ME) 11:51, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I thought it was mandatory until I nominated Lauryn Hill for GA status. I actually spent a huge amount of time adding every publisher to every reference in on the Beyonce Knowles discography. Both the Template: Cite web and Template:Cite news say that the publisher field should "not normally [be] included for periodicals", I think this stems from the corporate ownership changing so much and not really having much relevance; for example, The Village Voice has changed ownership three times over the past few years. —JennKR | 12:28, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but I've spent a lot of time just adding publishers and going through the references of the articles and fixing them. Anyway, if it's better this way, it's fine. My love is love (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
I have one more demand from you. Can you please take a look at Revel Presents: Beyoncé Live, copy-edit the prose and reduce the number of quotes? You can do this whenever you want or whenever you are free and ONLY if you want to do it. I want to nominate it for FA so I would be very grateful for your help. My love is love (talk) 18:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Help, please with my RfC?[edit]

Would you help me, please with RfC: Is inclusion of the word "cosmetic" in the Criteria section appropriate?

I started it after another user undid some changes I made in the Criteria of an assault weapon section of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban article. On my talk page, the user told me that what I'd done was "scrubbing," told me the matter had been discussed previously (implying but not citing a consensus of opinion among article editors), and just generally treated me like I'd not acted in good faith.

I have been a Wikipedia user for many years, and an editor for quite a few, too - though I am not a very experienced one. I'd never been involved in a dispute before that I can remember. When I realized what was going on (after a revert and another undo), I reviewed the Dispute resolution page and chose RfC. Perhaps I chose poorly, but here we are.

Help, please?

Lightbreather (talk) 01:44, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LGA talkedits 23:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

WP takes copyright very seriously, I will WP:AGF for your reasons behind why you cropped out the copyright watermark on this picture but if you do that sort of thing again you are likely to get blocked. LGA talkedits 23:06, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png, which you've attributed to http://www.flickr.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. LGA talkedits 07:23, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Beyonce Mrs Carter Montreal.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —JennKR | 12:41, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Rob Kardashian's middle name[edit]

Please note that realitytv.about.com is probably not a reliable source, especially for BLP's. Further, removing a source without explanation is inappropriate. [1] You'll note that there is a short discussion on the matter of his middle name on the talk page as well. --Ronz (talk) 20:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Overlinking[edit]

Hello JennKR. How are you? Are you ready to nominate "Countdown" for GA? I have to tell you about the last mistakes you did with the references of the article. One publication should be linked only once in the references, not every time it is mentioned. The thing you did last was WP:OVERLINKING. Plus remember that websites should never be italicized. If you put the work field in the references for a publication you should then make it in italics. My love is love (talk) 08:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Misha B[edit]

Regards RCA being a subsidiary of Sony, thus your advice on only using RCA. Relentless is a subsidiary too, not sure of RCA or the bigger Sony. Do you think we should just use Relentless?Bodney (talk) 19:05, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Zeitgeist: The Movie. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 06:16, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Revel[edit]

Can you tell me, is this article ready for FA and have you finished with your c/e? My love is love (talk) 13:20, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Simpson family[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Simpson family. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 07:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Madonna (entertainer) (estimated annual readership: 3,362,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Madonna (entertainer) to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:06, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

RE: Beyonce Knowles[edit]

I didn't read the whole article, but I will. For the record you did an incredible job with it, so I guess it will be easy at FA. Btw, can you please review Talk That Talk (Rihanna song) and comment here Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Talk That Talk (Rihanna song)/archive1? I would appreciate it. Cheers! — Tomíca(T2ME) 21:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

I read portions of the article. I have a suggestion, why don't you take the article for WP:Peer review? You can invite users to comment there... I will too :) — Tomíca(T2ME) 22:50, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Idolator / 4[edit]

You should remove the references that use Idolator from the article since you nominated it at the FAC. Idolator is an unreliable source. My love is love (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure. Because it is considered as a blog and blogs are unreliable. But I don't know, maybe you should contact someone else who had more experience with FAs. Don't make the changes until you're 100% sure. My love is love (talk) 20:13, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Yes, it is a magazine and it's reliable. I'm pretty sure it can be used. My love is love (talk) 20:27, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
About the picture you used in the Release and artwork I'm 50% sure that it will be deleted as non-free work can not be used on Wikipedia. But I think that you should wait for someone else's opinion; someone who knows better than me. My love is love (talk) 20:31, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Don't worry I think there are just some minor issues. You left me speechless with your re-write. It is amazing! I really, really hope it becomes an FA. My love is love (talk) 01:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
I must say that the prose of the article is flawless. However I think that there are several publications that will be questioned during the FAC review: The Boombox, Prefix Magazine, Idolator, MTV Buzzworthy, The CS Perspective and Entertainment Focus. I think that you should wait for someone to point it out at the review (if somebody points it out). But in the meantime you can find different sources that could replace them if that happens. This is just my advice. My love is love (talk) 02:48, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
MTV Buzzworthy is totally fine to use, since is part of the MTV publications and even if it's a blog, it's written by a qualified writer. — Tomíca(T2ME) 08:28, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

4[edit]

Hey Jenn, just a word of advice: after making significant changes to an article like you did at 4, it often pays to wait a week or two to let the changes "sink in" and so that a more consensual (and therefore, stable) article is reached before nominating at FAC. Stability is a criterion for both GA and FA. Great work on 4, by the way—what a big article to touch up! Adabow (talk) 00:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

No need to apologise at all! Good on your for being bold and jumping in the deep end! I just think that there's a possibility some editors may disagree with some or all of a major revamp. That's normal. People have different opinions. If an edit war or a heated talk page discussion arises though, it could seriously hurt the hope for FA promotion. Good luck! Also, if you're feeling up to it, drop a couple of comments in another FAC or two - you never know what you could learn about writing, the FAC process or even just fun facts about a topic! Adabow (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
PS. Wow, do you like Iggy too? I'm so excited, I'm going to see Beyonce and Iggy in October! Can't wait! Adabow (talk) 00:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

No words can be thankful to describe what you did on 4[edit]

Amazing!!! ... The best I can say. You re-wrote that whole article yourself all alone and it reads so well. I am short of words. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:51, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome. I prefer not to say when because every time I mention a date, I am never able to come back. But I am free on weekends now. So I will surely be here more often. I am going to change remove that template soon. And I see how hard you have work, you will definitely achieve what you want. There are many kind people here on Wikipedia who will surely help you. You may ask user WP Penguin to have a look at the prose. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 12:59, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes[edit]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Jem episodes. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. RFC bot (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)[edit]

Hello JennKR,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film)[edit]

Please have a look at the notability guidelines for future films which explains why this is not yet notable. I'd suggest any information be added to Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them#Film adaptation for now. --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 19:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Aura (song) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aura (song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aura (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Plmnji (talk) 00:23, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

Good Girl Gone Bad FAC[edit]

Hey Jen! How are you? Do you have some spare time to view and check the article and give some comments at the FAC? I would be grateful. Cheers! — Tomíca(T2ME) 21:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

A bit belated, but it looks like I owe you a second one of these:

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Lauryn Hill (estimated annual readership: 1,000,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Lauryn Hill to Good Article status.

Thanks for all you do--that's quite a lot of readers your work is helping. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:38, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Referencing[edit]

Not sure how to do full references with the (relatively) new Wikipedia editing layout? Please could you give me some guidance? Shiningroad (talk) 19:04, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

I'm actually not a fan, but on my social media people are excited about the album. I do like how she sampled the Nigerian writer's TED Talk, but I've not listened to the album at all (and I don't have iTunes). Shiningroad (talk) 19:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Beyonce (2013)[edit]

Thoughts on Beyoncé guys? Personally, I think it's sheer genius; my favourite B album and one of the best albums in years! —JennKR | 22:47, 13 December 2013 (UTC) @Adabow: @Journalist: @Acalamari: @Lolcakes25: @My love is love: @Tbhotch: @Jivesh boodhun:

Definitely her best album. "Partition", "Mine" and "Superpower" are my favourite tracks, but I love every song! Adabow (talk) 22:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
You fooled me at first, JennKR: I thought you'd posted this on the album's talk page, which would have shocked me if you had! :P Since this is your talk page and because you pinged me, I'll answer: I have not heard the album yet but I am looking forward to it and expect it to be excellent, as Beyonce's music always is. :) In the meantime, I'm glad to see that the album's article is developing nicely, so congratulations to you and everyone else working on it! Good work, indeed. :) Acalamari 23:01, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
I was so completely shocked when I woke up at 6am this morning to see her album just on iTunes. The visuals are stunning, I really was blown away. Pretty Hurts touched me especially the video. Pretty Love, XO, ***Flawless, Partition are my favorites, whilst Haunted, Pretty Love and Yoncé are my favorite videos. --Lolcakes25 (talk) 23:03, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
The visuals are fantastic! I listened to the album in one go, then went back and watched all the videos, and now I've returned to it again! I also agree that "Partition" is one of the best, also enjoying "***Flawless", "Haunted" and "Superpower". Sort of surprised that "Grown Woman" was relegated to a video extra and "Standing on the Sun" made no appearance, but I would argue that all fourteen tracks are superior to those. —JennKR | 23:17, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hi peeps. Hope you are all doing great. Well, I have only listened to "Mine" as of now and I love it so much. I am very busy in real life but I will try to find some more time to be here as from now. That's a promise. Don't you all think it's worth mentioning in the article about how the press is saying here and there that Beyonce has brought a "change" in the music industry. I mean this information is already there but it does not quite directly hints at it. I also read somewhere that the album caused iTunes website to crash (LOL, is this becoming a habit Beyonce, remember Superbowl anyone? :P )and it has set a new record for the most tweets. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 05:09, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
I'm dead, buried, rebirth, dead again and reburied. She's the greatest, most successful troll ever. This album is everything Artpop ever wanted to be, Prism ever dreamt off and Bangerz who? —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 12:41, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
Hahahaaha, IndianBio! Also, thank you Jivesh, I'm working somewhat on the "Music and lyrics" section, but I will (or I'm sure someone else will) slot them in when I get round to the other bits. —JennKR | 12:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/2013-12/enhanced/webdr06/13/12/enhanced-buzz-4863-1386955812-20.jpg, http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/2013-12/enhanced/webdr02/13/10/anigif_enhanced-buzz-7986-1386949694-0.gif ... It's my favorite Beyonce album so far. I think that she became the Mozart of pop music with this album. And Jenny you did a great job with the album. I think that you should nominate something for WP:DYK as the main contributor to the article. My love is love (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
I've been in a state of euphoria since I bought this album. At first, I was worried that people wouldn't get what she was was trying to do, and that they would receive it poorly. But I'm glad that I was wrong. Ratings are as follows:
  • "Pretty Hurts"—9/10
  • "Haunted"—8.5/10
  • "Drunk in Love"—9.5/10
  • "Blow"—9/10
  • "No Angel"—8/10
  • "Partition"—9.5/10
  • "Jealous"—8.5/10
  • "Rocket"—7.5/10
  • "Mine"—8.5/10
  • "XO"—9.5/10
  • "Flawless"—9.8/10
  • "Superpower"—10/10
  • "Heaven"—8/10
  • "Blue"—8/10
And the great thing is that the videos aren't just cheap clips like her B'day and Sasha Fierce days. They're epic short films. Love them all. Orane (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

BOOTS[edit]

Stylizes his name in all capitals.

You can see that here: https://soundcloud.com/thisisboots

Here: http://rapgenius.com/Beyonce-beyonce-credits-lyrics — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moraljonathan (talkcontribs) 02:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beyoncé (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • name="NY Daily Review"/> ''[[Spin (magazine)|Spin]]'' compared the album to its predecessor, ''[[4 (Beyoncé Knowles album|4]]'', saying that ''Beyoncé'' was more textured in terms of sound and
  • in terms of sound and content, noting Knowles' movement from "diva pop/R&B.<ref name="spin"/> (Bey Nick Catucci of ''[[Entertainment Weekly]]'' praised the album, and commented that "Some fans

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

FAC comment?[edit]

Hi. Would you be interested in voicing your support (or oppose/comment) at the FAC page for the article Of Human Feelings? If not, feel free to ignore this message. Dan56 (talk) 21:56, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas! :-)[edit]

Snowman drawing.svgHappy Yuletides! Snowflake.svg

Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!)

Hi JennKR, Wishing you a very Happy and Wonderful Merry Christmas! Hope you are having a great time with family and friends :-) Best wishes. ~TheGeneralUser (talk) 23:35, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

A personalized New Year greeting[edit]

File:The sun1.jpg
Hope you have a bright 2014! Acalamari 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi JennKR, Happy New Year! Thank you for your excellent work on Beyoncé Knowles-related articles. :) Best. Acalamari 13:56, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

New Year[edit]

Thank you a lot Jenny. That is very nice of you. I wish health and happiness to you too. My love is love (talk) 19:17, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Katy Perry help[edit]

While the work has only just started, thank you for stepping in to help with Katy Perry. It's hard to fully express how grateful I am for your help. :) Acalamari 18:42, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

That's fine! I know how hard peer reviews are to come by (especially for these types of article) and the article is at a good standard so there shouldn't be too much to do! :) —JennKR | 18:59, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
That's good to know; I look forward to seeing what happens. :) XXSNUGGUMSXX deserves a lot of credit for the article's current state. Acalamari 19:16, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you :3 XXSNUGGUMSXX (talk) 20:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Beyoncé (album)[edit]

Harrias talk 08:02, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

awards of Destiny's child are the same for beyoncę and kelly, la tavia and le toya(1997-2000) and michelle(2001-2014)[edit]

Insert in kelly, michelle tavia and toya,equally to beyonce109.55.203.65 (talk) 18:03, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Rowland and Williams's awards and nominations pages includes grammy and ascap in the group and s solo artists, and their solo awards ONLY, not like beyonce's page, which includes all destiny's child awards. Is not equal and correct.109.52.68.12 (talk) 22:50, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Peer review[edit]

Hello JennKR! I'm not sure if you give peer reviews, though, I'd love to see your comments on Trouble: much like 4, I'm trying to get it to FA eventually. Just some comments would be great. Thank you in advance. prism 18:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

FL[edit]

Hello, I've seen that you turned Beyoncé Knowles discography into an FL, so could you possibly give some comments here? Forget about my previous request. This is more important. Thank you in advance prism 15:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)