User talk:PRehse

This is PRehse's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|PRehse}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Suggestions

This page is getting a bit big. I suggest you ask this bot to do automatic archiving for you.

You saw that User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox had been moved to Mackenziequinn167/sandbox and applied a speedy tag to User:Mackenziequinn167/sandbox. That was unnecessary. You could have moved it back yourself - reversal of a move is permitted providing there have been no edits to the redirect. Try it next time. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:39, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RHaworth Cheers.PRehse (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion of Florian Munteanu

This page should not be speedily deleted because nothing on the page is incorrect when it comes to sources. Another reason is that Florian Munteanu is a known public figure, and a page about him would compliment that.

According to his manager Eduard Irimia, Florian Munteanu will star in three other Hollywood films in 2019: source in Romanian.

His page was first deleted on 21 October 2018 it had no sources, which I understood. I improved the page with many additions. Some people had concerns about his boxing career. He is not a professional boxer. Munteanu said that he had 78 amateur boxing matches. Legendfootballers (talk) · 20:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi! I have fixed both dead end and orphan issues on Angela King (peace activist) now. Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:50, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kind request for a potential review of "New Page": Dimash Adilet (Draft reviewed by you)

Greetings PRehse, I hope this message finds you well.

I am writing regarding a new article, the draft for which you have positively reviewed 3 days ago. The page name is Dimash Adilet I wanted to ask you, if you would be willing to review this page in your spare time, as I have just moved it into mainspace after some reviewing. I thought since you have already seen the draft, your opinion would be extremely valuable to me. I would welcome any thoughts you have on this.

I would like to create another article next month, but I only ever go on to a new article once I am sure the previous one is up to standards. If you give a positive opinion on this one, I can calmly leave it in the hands of the community, and go on to new pages. If you don't have time for this, however, by all means, do not feel pressured to review it.

Thank you very much in advance and thank you for your contribution to Wikipedia. Keep this community great! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatgoodperson (talk • contribs) 01:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I have just checked the page I told you about, and noticed that you made a small correction in the "categories" section. Thank you for taking your time to have a look. Did you get a chance to review it? Would you have any suggestions before I move on to other content? Thank you in advance, cheers! Thatgoodperson (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Andrade

I see you crossed out your delete vote. Being a tad presumptuous, I assume you're going to vote to keep it. Or are you? Papaursa (talk) 19:23, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Rush922(talk) 12:15, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holiday

	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!
	Hi PRehse, Sending you a warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019 and may this new year bring you joy and laughter. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:49, 13 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.[reply]

December 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 13:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello PRehse,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

new page reviewing

Greetings PRehse! I have some concerns that you reviewed this page and let it live in mainspace. It is full of puffery and non-neutral and unreliable sources such as the subject's LinkedIn account and company website. I went ahead and moved it back to the sandbox (via my work account Elysia (Wiki Ed)) and left the editor some feedback. I know that reviewing new pages is a thankless task and I also know you do a lot of it, so I'm sure pages like this slip through the cracks from time to time. Enwebb (talk) 20:24, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Enwebb Just placed some initial tags I seldom review articles. Definitely not this one.PRehse (talk) 23:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. Did you know that when you use the page curation toolbar to tag pages that it automatically marks the page as reviewed? Your log shows that you did review that page, but it seems that was not your intent. Enwebb (talk) 02:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello PRehse, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Meatsgains^(talk) 01:44, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sedbergh School

You need to do a revision to the Sedbergh School page to discuss issues with abuse in the 60's from masters and students. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsclear (talk • contribs) 00:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Directive 89/391/EEC

I wrote this from scratch, what's with this revert? Hekerui (talk) 15:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Directive 89/391/EEC#Attribution of Workplace Health and Safety Directive if you want to comment. Hekerui (talk) 15:19, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave a comment on the talk page addressing my argument. Hekerui (talk) 14:28, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to my comment at Talk:Workplace Health and Safety Directive. Hekerui (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hekerui Or you can move the page properly first (not copy paste) and then make the changes. What you should not do is create a topic on the same subject with just a title change like you did. It is disruptive and not helpful. Your title I think is marginally better than the original so I don't it is a problem but others may disagree.PRehse (talk) 15:58, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ambrogio Spinola

Someone re-changed the page of Ambrogio Spinola and re-putted a title of Marquis in the name of the article, which makes it unusually long :(

I think most sources refer to him simply as Ambrogio Spinola and the lead and infobox explains all his titles. So i don't understand why the ", 1st Marquis of the Balbasses" is being added in the name of the article. Also I don't know if the move has been done correctly.

Barjimoa (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

About Arasp Kazemian

hello dear, PRhse,

About the page Arasp Kazemian all notabilities are written in persian language and in perisan websites. What should we do to keep it on Wikipedia. He is very famous, please look at his personal website www.kazemian.net --Parsbyte (talk) 20:44, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

John Erskine, 18th Earl of Mar

Hello
I notice you deleted the edit note I left here, without any explanation. It was there for a reason, but maybe I didn't explain it very well. I've re-written it; if you aren't happy about it, can you please say why? Regards, Swanny18 (talk) 01:19, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Melanie George Smith

How do you move a page when the designation page already exists? The name "Melanie G. Smith" is incorrect. Her name is "Melanie George Smith" according to the sources. BTW, instead of just reverting pages, you could have tried to help before (also when you reverted, you did not look at the changes between the pages and so you lost updated information). Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 18:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please help me

Hi, I'm obviously doing something wrong trying to publish this article about Ashi Tashi Dorji. Pls can you advise. Doctor 17 (talk) 11:05, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Baron Cobham

I have reverted to the last version by Charlie Awesome, removing text added by suspected sockpuppet account of banned user User:G.-M. Cupertino. Unfortunatly this has also removed some of your edits. Please do not remove red links and please do not add any more text to the article unless it is supported by inline citations (WP:PROVEIT). -- PBS (talk) 19:14, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Care!

Please be more careful. List of Teen Wolf secondary characters was not the same as list of Teen Wolf minor characters and list of Teen Wolf characters was (and still is!) monstrous in size and desperately needed splitting. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:26, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I cant understand the issues you are talking about. Please help me understand which words are weasel. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Proma Mitra10 (talk • contribs) 09:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people from Morelos, Mexico, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amatlán (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rakim Cleveland

Why did you delete my article? He is a credible fighter and has over 3 fights in large organizations. You probably don’t much about MMA but PFL is the third biggsest MMA promotion in the United States. Please undelete it because I spent 3 hours making his page. Did you even read the article and check out record? I’m really not happy about what you did.. Castro13 (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

denise mercedes speedy Deletion

is there a exact reason you keep marking the page for speedy deletion ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aherron76 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your reversion of my edits of the Kaltenbach article

Hi,

you reverted my edits on Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster) and Kaltenbach (White Elster). I know that for a proper attribution a move is preferred. However, I couldn't perform the move myself because the targets of the moves already existed. I've once asked an admistrator's help in a similar case, see here, but don't think the result was more clearly than my edit summary "content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution" at Kaltenbach (White Elster). (The admistrator did delete the redir, then moved the full article to the new title which was deleted before.)

Also, after I did the I did some more stuff after the copy paste of the article: I've exchanged the talk pages of these articles as well, modified the links pointing to these articles Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster) and modified the interlanguage links in Wikimedia. You did not revert this, so now the pages were in somewhat confusion. (E.g. a double redir at Kaltenbach (Weisse Elster).)

I therefore reverted your revert again. However, If you really think that my edit summary content taken from Kaltenbach (Weiße Elster), see its history for attribution is not enough for telling everyone the proper attritbution, please tell me (I put your talk page on my watch list). I can revert all my contributions, then ask an admistrator to delete the redir, and then perform the move again.

Regards --Cyfal (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cyfal The easiest way is to request a speedy deletion (Db-G6) specific for a move (usually with Twinkle) and when granted just move the article. Complicated copy pastes are just not done. Please revert and I will help with the move requests.PRehse (talk) 16:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I reverted a part and will do the other things in the next days. --Cyfal (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dong Wenfei

There seems to be no getting rid of this article. Every time it's removed the author recreates it almost immediately. Papaursa (talk) 01:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa Not for lack of trying, time for a new AfD.PRehse (talk) 16:07, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TAD Disability Services and TAD Australia

Currently there is an article TAD Disability Services (which is for one state only), and a redirect to it from the national body TAD Australia. I proposed that the national body should have the article, expanded to cover other states as well. In the process, the direction of the redirect was to be reversed. Nobody objected to the proposal, so I did it. But you reverted my work on these articles with the comment "improper copy paste losses attribution - do correct move instead". I am unclear how to proceed. If I just move one of those articles over the top of the other, the history of the target page will be lost. What is the "correct move" procedure in this case where the target already exists? --Gronk Oz (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gronk Oz I see your point. Give me a momment to set it right.PRehse (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gronk Oz Ok please put all your changes into TAD Disability Services. A copy paste from the last version of TAD Australia before my redirect is fine. I would do it myself but then you would loose your attribution. Once done I will ask the TAD Australia to be deleted so TAD Disability Services can be moved in it's place.PRehse (talk) 16:31, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I have updated TAD Disability Services to where it was. --Gronk Oz (talk) 08:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done I see that the move is all done now

- thank you for your help, and I apologize for causing the confusion.--Gronk Oz (talk) 06:20, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dancin' Thru The Dark on Wikipedia

Hi there, I noticed yesterday that the wikipedia page dedicated to the film Dancin' Thru the Dark had been redirected to the Screen One page. On it, it is hard to find the film if you do not know it. As I think this film deserves its own page, I recreated it, in the same manner as the film 'A Question of Attribution that has a link to its own page from Screen One. This made me assume that the same could be done for Dancin' Thru The Dark. However, I notice that all my work has been reverted. Are you responsible for this and if yes, can you explain why this is done? I do hope the film can have a Wikipedia page.

kind regards, jotola

Jotola (talk) 16:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker): Jotola, if you check the history on Dancin' Thru The Dark, you will see that was reverted by Onel5969 with the following edit summary: "doesn't meet wp:nfilm". That refers to Wikipedia's guidelines for determining whether a film is "Notable" (in Wikipedia's special meaning of the term) enough to have its own article. You can read those detailed criteria at the following link: WP:NFILM.

The article as you wrote it had four references. Two of those just related to the Trivia section which should not be there at all. One was simply a link to a BBC One page that did not even mention this movie. That just leaves one, which was an interview with the writer, Willy Russell, about the movie. That one reference is a long way short of the standard of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject".

So to establish the movie's notability, I suggest starting by collecting your sources. Find all the books that have been written about the movie. Find the full-length reviews published by major critics. Find the in-depth articles written about it in major newspapers and magazines. Find where Sixty Minutes and other reliable journalistic shows have discussed it in detail. Find the major national and international awards it has won. And so on ... see the Notability criteria linked above for the sort of things that will support the case for keeping the article. Then write the article based on what those sources say, citing them as you go. I hope this helps - good luck! --Gronk Oz (talk) 01:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo Gronk Oz. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for the criteria, work to be done then. Jotola (talk) 17:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jotola: I have just improved the redirect, but there is more detail in the deleted content than currently in Screen One#Dancin' Thru the Dark which I think shouldn’t be lost. I’m almost ambivalent about whether Dancin' Thru the Dark should be resuscitated as an article or the extra content should be added to the Screen One table, but on balance I prefer the former as it would overload the Screen One table disproportionately. Here are some references that might help justify Dancin' Thru the Dark being an article: Radio Times, Time Out, BFI, BBFC, Mike Ockrent obit, The Guardian, Colin Welland obit, The Guardian, Richard Broke obit, The Independent, Rotten Tomatoes

Jim Craigie (talk) 17:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Farshid Asadian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farshid Asadian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farshid Asadian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RhinosF1^(chat)_{(status)(contribs)} 22:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Polyamorph. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, LIberty (sternwheeler), and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Polyamorph (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, not something I intended to do. Cheers, Polyamorph (talk) 09:15, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Air India 101

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Air India 101 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Petebutt (talk) 09:50, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Skarlet

Sorry about that. I meant to have the article located at Skarlet, since it directs to nowhere else. I tried to do a proper move from Skarlet (Mortal Kombat character), but it wouldn't let me, since the page already existed as a redirect. I think I need some help here. Kokoro20 (talk) 11:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kokoro20 Best way is to request a deletion for the purpose of a move and then when done move the page. I have stated the process for you.PRehse (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, alight. Thank you. That should hopefully take care of things. Kokoro20 (talk) 12:26, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sahib Bir Singh

Something wrong with the reviewing tool. I just moved the page, it was in the Wikipedia: space, and didn't review it at all. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 04:31, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image for Wikipedia entry “Aaron Sarlo

I was wondering if you could help me. I submitted the photo yesterday, which I have permission to use. It got flagged as a potential copyright / licensing issue. It recommended that I contact the photographer who owns the image, and ask him to email Wikipedia and tell them he allows its use, which he did. I also have an invoice from the photographer that grants me a universal license to use the image on Wikipedia and elsewhere. My issue: it looks like the image is still flagged. What can I do to clear it with Wikipedia? Thank you. Brian Keiths (talk) 21:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some bubble tea for you!

Thank you for helping me with my first Wikipedia contribution. Dlwsnz (talk) 02:31, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello PRehse,

News

The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the {{rough translation}} tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.

Discussions of interest

Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
{{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.

Reminders

NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.

NPP Tools Report

Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delsort - AfD

Hi PRehse, Greetings. I had nominated 4 MMA fighter articles for AfD about 4-5 days ago, but they have yet to show up on "Alert section" of Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts. I have sought help - see here Delsort - AfD, and Bot operator has assisted on the matter; however, I still have yet to see the AfD articles listed on WikiProject MMA page.Just wonder, does the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts need to include "delsort" on the banner of the talk page? or certain tag is missing to cause the problem. Kindly advise and thank in advance. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, good day. I just want to inform you that I have sought help and the issue has been resolved, - see HERE as the bot was fixed and started to pick up delsort again. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 08:28, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this article

Hey when you have time could you please review this article I made? Geovana Peres vs Lani Daniels II Thanks --Bennyaha (talk) 02:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hope all is well with you

Peter, I noticed you haven't been doing much WP editing lately. Just want to let you know that you and your contributions are missed. I'm hoping it's simply because you're taking a Wikibreak (I know how sometimes those are needed) and not because you're dealing with more unpleasant issues. Papaursa (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa Sick computer enforced a long overdue wikibreak. Was spending too much time so a reset was in order. All is well thanks for asking.PRehse (talk) 06:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter, I have the same thought as Papaursa for not seeing you lately. Good to know all is well with you. See you when you return. Cheers. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please give me your advice

Hi. Can you please take a look at the draft Draft:Horiyasu that I created. It translated it from the Japanese Wikipedia but is was declined two times on English Wikipedia. I reworked it and submitted for the moderation again. While I did that there was a service message saying that Youtube links should be removed (which I did). Since you know Japan quite well and since you are a very experienced editor I would like to ask for your advice. Please tell what to do with these YouTube links and what else needs to be improved in this draft. Thank you!--Martenpharez (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello PRehse,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.

Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News

Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.

Discussions of interest

A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

World Martial Art Masterships

Hi please create new article about new grand martial arts competition.

2016 : The 2016 Cheongju World Martial Arts Masterships, which is to begin on September 2, will be an Olympics for martial arts with 2073 ...........

2017 World Youth martial Arts Masterships

Chungju World Martial Arts Masterships - 2019

Two for seniors and one for youth.

http://www.martialarts.or.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=history_eng

http://womau.org/bbs/board.php?bo_table=e_b4x1&wr_id=119

http://womau.org/e_index_true.php?pageNum=1&subNum=1

http://www.chungju2019.com/home_eng/sub.php?menukey=130

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello PRehse,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter September-October 2019

Hello PRehse,

Backlog

Instead of reaching a magic 300 as it once did last year, the backlog approaching 6,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Coordinator

A proposal is taking place here to confirm a nominated user as Coordinator of NPR.

This month's refresher course

Why I Hate Speedy Deleters, a 2008 essay by long since retired Ballonman, is still as valid today. Those of us who patrol large numbers of new pages can be forgiven for making the occasional mistake while others can learn from their 'beginner' errors. Worth reading.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon (you will need to have 'Nominated for deletion' enabled for this in your filters) may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders using Twinkle. They require your further verification.

Paid editing

Please be sure to look for the tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. WMF policy requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines' (SNG). Alternatives to deletion

Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves once more with notability guidelines for organisations and companies.
Blank-and-Redirect is a solution anchored in policy. Please consider this alternative before PRODing or CSD. Note however, that users will often revert or usurp redirects to re-create deleted articles. Do regularly patrol the redirects in the feed.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, and if they do have potential, tag as required, then move to draft. Modify the text of the template as appropriate before sending it.

Tools

Regular reviewers will appreciate the most recent enhancements to the New Pages Feed and features in the Curation tool, and there are still more to come. Due to the wealth of information now displayed by ORES, reviewers are strongly encouraged to use the system now rather than Twinkle; it will also correctly populate the logs.

Stub sorting, by SD0001: A new script is available for adding/removing stub tags. See User:SD0001/StubSorter.js, It features a simple HotCat-style dynamic search field. Many of the reviewers who are using it are finding it an improvement upon other available tools.

Assessment: The script at User:Evad37/rater makes the addition of Wikiproject templates extremely easy. New page creators rarely do this. Reviewers are not obliged to make these edits but they only take a few seconds. They can use the Curation message system to let the creator know what they have done.

DannyS712 bot III is now patrolling certain categories of uncontroversial redirects. Curious? Check out its patrol log.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Aikido terms and principles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Aikido terms and principles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 06:42, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello PRehse,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 804 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays and wishing you a good 2020

Sorry that you've cut way back on your WP editing, but I do understand (as I've reduced mine). Still, I wanted to let you know you haven't been forgotten and wanted to wish you happy holidays and a happy and healthy 2020. Papaursa (talk) 02:50, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Papaursa A sick computer was the excuse to cut back on what had become serious mission creep. Might do more editing again but will see. Thanks for the note and best holiday wishes from my end.PRehse (talk) 11:55, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter December 2019

Reviewer of the Year

This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.

Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.

Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.

Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.

Top 10 Reviewers over the last 365 days
Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	Rosguill (talk)	47,395	Patrol Page Curation
2	Onel5969 (talk)	41,883	Patrol Page Curation
3	JTtheOG (talk)	11,493	Patrol Page Curation
4	Arthistorian1977 (talk)	5,562	Patrol Page Curation
5	DannyS712 (talk)	4,866	Patrol Page Curation
6	CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk)	3,995	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	3,812	Patrol Page Curation
8	Boleyn (talk)	3,655	Patrol Page Curation
9	Ymblanter (talk)	3,553	Patrol Page Curation
10	Cwmhiraeth (talk)	3,522	Patrol Page Curation

(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)

Redirect autopatrol

A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.

Source Guide Discussion

Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.

This month's refresher course

While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Xmas

Merry Christmas, PRehse!
Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Atlantic306 ^{TT me} 11:12, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Hi Peter, Bet you have a good well-deserved Wiki break. Happy New Year and good to see you are back. Best. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 19:18, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested

Peter, if you're interested, and feeling of stout constitution, there's a bunch of MMA proposals at WT:MMANOT. I would understand if you're not so inclined, but you're generally a voice of reason and that topic can always use all the reason it can get. Just coming off a 3 week break myself and I can see the allure of it. I came back and, fool that I am, waded into those discussions and a number of martial arts AfD ones as well. Papaursa (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:German eskrimadors

A tag has been placed on Category:German eskrimadors requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter February 2020

Hello PRehse,

Source Guide Discussion

The first NPP source guide discussion is now underway. It covers a wide range of sources in Ghana with the goal of providing more guidance to reviewers about sources they might see when reviewing pages. Hopefully, new page reviewers will join others interested in reliable sources and those with expertise in these sources to make the discussion a success.

Redirects

New to NPP? Looking to try something a little different? Consider patrolling some redirects. Redirects are relatively easy to review, can be found easily through the New Pages Feed. You can find more information about how to patrol redirects at WP:RPATROL.

Discussions and Resources

There is an ongoing discussion around changing notifications for new editors who attempt to write articles.
A recent discussion of whether Michelin starred restraunts are notable was archived without closure.
A resource page with links pertinent for reviewers was created this month.
A proposal to increase the scope of G5 was withdrawn.

Refresher

Geographic regions, areas and places generally do not need general notability guideline type sourcing. When evaluating whether an article meets this notability guideline please also consider whether it might actually be a form of WP:SPAM for a development project (e.g. PR for a large luxury residential development) and not actually covered by the guideline.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7095 Low – 4991 High – 7095

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

16:08, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

ashi tashi dorji

Hi, I'm hoping you can help. Last January 2019 I did an article on Ashi Tashi Dorji, which you kindly moved out of my sandbox. I'm not sure what I did wrong that it didn't appear, but too long ago to try to figure that out. My concern now is that I am still attached to the article through my sandbox talk page. I also would like to clear my sandbox, but not sure how. Hoping you can help! regards Doctor 17 (talk) 07:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Review on 'Francesco Sidoti' and possibly on 'Pedro Scuro'

== Old Quarrels ==

Hello PRehse. This morning I edited a page on Francesco Sidoti and, exclusively by my own mistake I clicked on an old entry ["Pedro Scuro"] the subject of a bitter discussion with one or two of your colleagues, on account of the entry having "promotional content under criterion G11" (!?). That happened years ago and their allegations were so outlandish that I simply gave up publishing the text altogether. There was absolutely no "promotional content" whatsoever, as the subject of the entry is a highly regarded intellectual with important contributions to his fields of knowledge, and a member of prestigious international organizations. He was also my former mentor, so I would have never wanted to put him or his work in any embarrassing circumstance. Nevertheless, as I concede that one might always be in the wrong, it would be much more profitable if my fault-finders disclose exactly where exactly my text was "promotional". On the other hand, over and above all that unpleasant hugger-mugger, I'm now trying to publish a new entry, on Francesco Sidoti, so I'm awaiting your kind reply. Yours, Peiris Fox Peiris Fox (talk) 00:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC) 00:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer newsletter June 2020

Hello PRehse,

Your help can make a difference

NPP Sorting can be a great way to find pages needing new page patrolling that match your strengths and interests. Using ORES, it divides articles into topics such as Literature or Chemistry and on Geography. Take a look and see if you can find time to patrol a couple pages a day. With over 10,000 pages in the queue, the highest it's been since ACPERM, your help could really make a difference.

Google Adds New Languages to Google Translate

In late February, Google added 5 new languages to Google Translate: Kinyarwanda, Odia (Oriya), Tatar, Turkmen and Uyghur. This expands our ability to find and evaluate sources in those languages.

Discussions and Resources

A discussion on handling new article creation by paid editors is ongoing at the Village Pump.
Also at the Village Pump is a discussion about limiting participation at Articles for Deletion discussion.
A proposed new speedy deletion criteria for certain kinds of redirects ended with no consensus.
Also ending with no change was a proposal to change how we handle certain kinds of vector images.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 10271 Low – 4991 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aikido FAR

I have nominated Aikido for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:11, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at WT:MARTIAL § Karate Association of Darbhanga

You are invited to join the discussion at WT:MARTIAL § Karate Association of Darbhanga. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:44, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PRehse. If you've got a bit of spare time, I'm wondering if you could take a look at this. There's been quite a number of accounts showing up and being blocked for socks. They're all editing articles related to this association and one of its members. (See also User talk:Dane#Deprodding of Deepika Dhiman and User talk:Dane#Deprodding of Karate Association of Darbhanga). If the articles can be kept then fine, but that's not completely clear. Since you've got lots of experience working with these types of articles, you might be able to better assess them than I can. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:49, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lethwei task force

Hello, I'm Lethweimaster. I am aware you are a member of many combat sports Wiki Projects and have edited many Lethwei related article. I am not aware if you usually involved in WikiProjects, but I just created the Wikipedia:WikiProject Lethwei and was wondering if you were interested in being part of the project? If you are interested in being part of the team, please go add your name on the wiki project page and let me know if you have any advices since you have more experience than me on Project pages! Let's grow the ecosystem of Lethwei together! Best regards, Lethweimaster (talk)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello PRehse,

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank	Username	Num reviews	Log
1	DannyS712 bot III (talk)	67,552	Patrol Page Curation
2	Rosguill (talk)	63,821	Patrol Page Curation
3	John B123 (talk)	21,697	Patrol Page Curation
4	Onel5969 (talk)	19,879	Patrol Page Curation
5	JTtheOG (talk)	12,901	Patrol Page Curation
6	Mcampany (talk)	9,103	Patrol Page Curation
7	DragonflySixtyseven (talk)	6,401	Patrol Page Curation
8	Mccapra (talk)	4,918	Patrol Page Curation
9	Hughesdarren (talk)	4,520	Patrol Page Curation
10	Utopes (talk)	3,958	Patrol Page Curation

Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Anne Cannon Forsyth

Why are her 2 living daughters omitted from mention? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:6C40:4300:40E:41EC:4844:3C87:D15F (talk) 02:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

File:Christmas tree decorations 5.jpg	Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021!
	Hello PRehse, Wishing you a joyous holiday season and a happy and peaceful New Year. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia^(talk) 00:00, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Martial arts bio assessment request

Hi PRehese. Could you take a look at Maurice Novoa and assess it? Concerns about it being a possible autobio were raised on the creator's user talk page here and it would be nice if an uninvolved editor familiar with martial bios could take a look at it. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page opinion.

Hello can you please have a look at this page and tell me what you think of its title being charged please. As this is a very bold edit, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oomoto Thankyou. Zongqi (talk) 08:22, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Special:ListFiles/PRehse

Hi!

You have uploaded these 3 files and the text says "Picture of myself". That mean that you are probably not the photographer.

The copyright belongs to the photographer so I would like to ask if you can tell us who the photographer is and even better if the photographer can send us a permission. --MGA73 (talk) 15:49, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tomiki-ryu Aikido and Jieitaikakutojutsu.

Hey - I hope you are the right guy for this. Anyway, the Jieitaikakutojutsu page made me think, as Kenji Tomiki was one of the people who helped establish the Aikido techniques in JTKJ; would it be accurate to say this would count as Tomiki-ryu/Shodokan Aikido?

There's this one "IP-numbers-username" guy who thinks it's wrong, as JTKJ was established in 1959 (with development process beginning in 1955) and Tomiki-ryu/Shodokan was *sorta* founded in 1958 (as far as Tomiki starting to teach Aikido at Wasada University) and officially in 1967 (with establishment of the honbu dojo). Also Tomiki has been involved with Judo and experimenting with new stuff in Aikido since late 1940s. Basically, I'm asking "at what point does Tomiki's Aikido start to deviate from Aikikai/base Aikido enough to be indentified as Tomiki-ryu Aikido?"

I'd like your thoughts on the matter. Thanks! TrickShotFinn (talk) 15:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TrickShotFinn The introduction of Aikido techniques does not make something a derivative of Aikido. That's true with the Goshin kata of Judo as with the JTKG. The dogma at Shodokan Honbu is that it is the Aikido of Ueshiba that's taught and if anything it is a training method. Still, since in 1958 he was very much part of the Aikikai the 1967 date makes the most sense for a separation date. I hope that helps.PRehse (talk) 10:46, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Thanks.TrickShotFinn (talk) 11:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Klement Tinaj for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Klement Tinaj is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klement Tinaj (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eastmain (talk • contribs) 05:44, 1 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter September 2021

Hello PRehse,

Please join this discussion - there is increase in the abuse of Wikipedia and its processes by POV pushers, Paid Editors, and by holders of various user rights including Autopatrolled. Even our review systems themselves at AfC and NPR have been infiltrated. The good news is that detection is improving, but the downside is that it creates the need for a huge clean up - which of course adds to backlogs.

Copyright violations are also a serious issue. Most non-regular contributors do not understand why, and most of our Reviewers are not experts on copyright law - and can't be expected to be, but there is excellent, easy-to-follow advice on COPYVIO detection here.

At the time of the last newsletter (#25, December 2020) the backlog was only just over 2,000 articles. New Page Review is an official system. It's the only firewall against the inclusion of new, improper pages.

There are currently 706 New Page Reviewers plus a further 1,080 admins, but as much as nearly 90% of the patrolling is still being done by around only the 20 or so most regular patrollers.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process or its software.

Various awards are due to be allocated by the end of the year and barnstars are overdue. If you would like to manage this, please let us know. Indeed, if you are interested in coordinating NPR, it does not involve much time and the tasks are described here.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. Sent to 827 users. 04:32, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

November 2021 backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| November 2021 Backlog Drive
On November 1, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. (t · c) buidhe 01:59, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion invitation

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mixed martial arts § The Sherdog requirement. Cassiopeia talk 01:42, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Season’s Greetings

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Hi PRehse, Have an enjoyable holiday season! Cassiopeia talk 09:31, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aniket Gupta Karate Athlete from India

Dear Respected Sir

I am National level karate athlete from India and I am not professional on computers and Wikipedia’s so I not able to create any article/page of sports person.

So I hereby humbly requested you to please help me to fixed a problem Related to Mr. Aniket Gupta Karate player and other Articles.

Because he is India's one the senior most Player from Delhi delhi state (India), He is Working in Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance (Govt. of India) (sports Quota Job 2016) and He is 4 Time Commonwealth Karate Championships medalist, 4 Time South Asian Karate Championship Medalist and other international medalist and also he is the 14 Times Official National karate Championship medalist (National Federation - NF) since 2005 till date and 18 Times official Delhi State Karate Championship Champion since 2004 till date and I am one of the Biggest Fan of Karate and as well as Aniket Gupta Karate.

Link of Aniket Gupta: ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aniket_Gupta )

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nH63zVPdcA

https://arunachalobserver.org/2020/01/11/indian-karatekas-curve-niche-global-events/

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/aniket-gupta-and-deepika-dhiman-selected-for-karate-league/

https://thedailyguardian.com/india-doesnt-have-a-sports-culture-aniket/

https://arunachaltimes.in/index.php/2021/03/11/gupta-and-dhiman-leave-for-turkey-to-participate-in-wkf-karate-1-premier-league/

https://olympics.com/en/news/world-karate-championships-2021-india-results

http://setopen.sportdata.org/wkfranking/ranking_main_competitor.php?ranking_country=IND&ranking_competitor=IND&ranking_competitor_name=GUPTA%20ANIKET

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mr_QDbFREwE

https://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship-113101500498_1.html

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship/articleshow/24198108.cms

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/karate-national-champions-are-not-even-covered-by-media-aniket-gupta/

https://arunachalobserver.org/2020/01/11/indian-karatekas-curve-niche-global-events/

https://sportslightmedia.com/aniket-gupta-deepika-dhiman-to-represent-india-in-karate-1-premier-league/

https://www.sportzbusiness.com/aniket-gupta-and-deepika-dhiman-selected-for-karate-league/

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/more-sports/others/india-bag-rich-medal-haul-at-commonwealth-karate-championship/articleshow/24198108.cms

https://www.dailyexcelsior.com/india-bags-4-medals-in-karate-with-ambedkar-as-coach/

https://newsstump.com/aniket-gupta-question-to-kai-work-culture/

https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-IRTB-17752

https://sportsauthorityofindia.nic.in/writereaddata/linkimages/2775656735.pdf

https://arunachaltimes.in/index.php/2021/03/11/gupta-and-dhiman-leave-for-turkey-to-participate-in-wkf-karate-1-premier-league/

https://www.wkf.net/imagenes/campeonatos/akf-seniorresultados-16th-akf-senior-championships-15-21-july-tashkent-uzbekistan-001.pdf

https://www.the-sports.org/aniket-gupta-karate-spf609167.html

Thank you so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.51.116.194 (talk) 18:19, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments

Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Talk:List of Eat Bulaga! segments during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Urban Versis 32 (talk) 20:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter May 2022

Hello PRehse,

At the time of the last newsletter (No.26, September 2021), the backlog was 'only' just over 6,000 articles. In the past six months, the backlog has reached nearly 16,000, a staggering level not seen in several years. A very small number of users had been doing the vast majority of the reviews. Due to "burn-out", we have recently lost most of this effort. Furthermore, several reviewers have been stripped of the user right for abuse of privilege and the articles they patrolled were put back in the queue.

Several discussions on the state of the process have taken place on the talk page, but there has been no action to make any changes. The project also lacks coordination since the "position" is vacant.

In the last 30 days, only 100 reviewers have made more than 8 patrols and only 50 have averaged one review a day. There are currently 804 New Page Reviewers, but about a third have not had any activity in the past month. All 852 administrators have this permission, but only about a dozen significantly contribute to NPP.

This means we have an active pool of about 450 to address the backlog. We cannot rely on a few to do most of the work as that inevitably leads to burnout. A fairly experienced reviewer can usually do a review in a few minutes. If every active reviewer would patrol just one article per day, the backlog would very quickly disappear.

If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, do suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.

If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
Sent 05:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

New Page Patrol newsletter June 2022

Hello PRehse,

Backlog status

At the time of the last newsletter (No.27, May 2022), the backlog was approaching 16,000, having shot up rapidly from 6,000 over the prior two months. The attention the newsletter brought to the backlog sparked a flurry of activity. There was new discussion on process improvements, efforts to invite new editors to participate in NPP increased and more editors requested the NPP user right so they could help, and most importantly, the number of reviews picked up and the backlog decreased, dipping below 14,000^[a] at the end of May.

Since then, the news has not been so good. The backlog is basically flat, hovering around 14,200. I wish I could report the number of reviews done and the number of new articles added to the queue. But the available statistics we have are woefully inadequate. The only real number we have is the net queue size.^[b]

In the last 30 days, the top 100 reviewers have all made more than 16 patrols (up from 8 last month), and about 70 have averaged one review a day (up from 50 last month).

While there are more people doing more reviews, many of the ~730 with the NPP right are doing little. Most of the reviews are being done by the top 50 or 100 reviewers. They need your help. We appreciate every review done, but please aim to do one a day (on average, or 30 a month).

Backlog drive

A backlog reduction drive, coordinated by buidhe and Zippybonzo, will be held from July 1 to July 31. Sign up here. Barnstars will be awarded.

TIP – New school articles

Many new articles on schools are being created by new users in developing and/or non-English-speaking countries. The authors are probably not even aware of Wikipedia's projects and policy pages. WP:WPSCH/AG has some excellent advice and resources specifically written for these users. Reviewers could consider providing such first-time article creators with a link to it while also mentioning that not all schools pass the GNG and that elementary schools are almost certainly not notable.

Misc

There is a new template available, {{NPP backlog}}, to show the current backlog. You can place it on your user or talk page as a reminder:

Very high unreviewed pages backlog: 12058 articles, as of 22:00, 10 November 2024 (UTC), according to DatBot

There has been significant discussion at WP:VPP recently on NPP-related matters (Draftification, Deletion, Notability, Verifiability, Burden). Proposals that would somewhat ease the burden on NPP aren't gaining much traction, although there are suggestions that the role of NPP be fundamentally changed to focus only on major CSD-type issues.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Notes

^ not including another ~6,000 redirects
^ The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP July 2022 backlog drive is on!

New Page Patrol \| July 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 July, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter August 2022

Hello PRehse,

Backlog status

After the last newsletter (No.28, June 2022), the backlog declined another 1,000 to 13,000 in the last week of June. Then the July backlog drive began, during which 9,900 articles were reviewed and the backlog fell by 4,500 to just under 8,500 (these numbers illustrate how many new articles regularly flow into the queue). Thanks go to the coordinators Buidhe and Zippybonzo, as well as all the nearly 100 participants. Congratulations to Dr vulpes who led with 880 points. See this page for further details.

Unfortunately, most of the decline happened in the first half of the month, and the backlog has already risen to 9,600. Understandably, it seems many backlog drive participants are taking a break from reviewing and unfortunately, we are not even keeping up with the inflow let alone driving it lower. We need the other 600 reviewers to do more! Please try to do at least one a day.

Coordination: MB and Novem Linguae have taken on some of the coordination tasks. Please let them know if you are interested in helping out. MPGuy2824 will be handling recognition, and will be retroactively awarding the annual barnstars that have not been issued for a few years.

Open letter to the WMF: The Page Curation software needs urgent attention. There are dozens of bug fixes and enhancements that are stalled (listed at Suggested improvements). We have written a letter to be sent to the WMF and we encourage as many patrollers as possible to sign it here. We are also in negotiation with the Board of Trustees to press for assistance. Better software will make the active reviewers we have more productive.

TIP - Reviewing by subject: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages by their most familiar subjects can do so from the regularly updated sorted topic list.

New reviewers: The NPP School is being underused. The learning curve for NPP is quite steep, but a detailed and easy-to-read tutorial exists, and the Curation Tool's many features are fully described and illustrated on the updated page here.

Reminders

Consider staying informed on project issues by putting the project discussion page on your watchlist.
If you have noticed a user with a good understanding of Wikipedia notability and deletion, suggest they help the effort by placing {{subst:NPR invite}} on their talk page.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be part of the New Page Reviewer user group, please consider asking any admin to remove you from the list. This will enable NPP to have a better overview of its performance and what improvements need to be made to the process and its software.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP UBX

Hi. You may wish to add this to your user page: {{Wikipedia:New pages patrol/CoY userbox 2017}} Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:28, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP message

Hi PRehse,

Invitation

For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2019

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For over 100 article reviews during 2019. Thank you for patrolling new pages and helping us out with the backlog! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2019. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We are almost caught up. If you don't want to receive "old" barnstars, please just ignore this and reply to let us know not to send you any more. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Award for 2018

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1,000 article reviews during 2018. Well done! Keep up the good work! -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a barnstar to show appreciation for the NPP reviews you did back in 2018. We realize this is late, but NPP fell behind in some coordination activities. We have just caught up with giving out deserved barnstars. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022 New Pages Patrol backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2022 backlog drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles. Redirect patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

(t · c) buidhe 21:17, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol newsletter October 2022

Hello PRehse,

Much has happened since the last newsletter over two months ago. The open letter finished with 444 signatures. The letter was sent to several dozen people at the WMF, and we have heard that it is being discussed but there has been no official reply. A related article appears in the current issue of The Signpost. If you haven't seen it, you should, including the readers' comment section.

Awards: Barnstars were given for the past several years (thanks to MPGuy2824), and we are now all caught up. The 2021 cup went to John B123 for leading with 26,525 article reviews during 2021. To encourage moderate activity, a new "Iron" level barnstar is awarded annually for reviewing 360 articles ("one-a-day"), and 100 reviews earns the "Standard" NPP barnstar. About 90 reviewers received barnstars for each of the years 2018 to 2021 (including the new awards that were given retroactively). All awards issued for every year are listed on the Awards page. Check out the new Hall of Fame also.

Software news: Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have connected with WMF developers who can review and approve patches, so they have been able to fix some bugs, and make other improvements to the Page Curation software. You can see everything that has been fixed recently here. The reviewer report has also been improved.

Suggestions:

There is much enthusiasm over the low backlog, but remember that the "quality and depth of patrolling are more important than speed".
Reminder: an article should not be tagged for any kind of deletion for a minimum of 15 minutes after creation and it is often appropriate to wait an hour or more. (from the NPP tutorial)
Reviewers should focus their effort where it can do the most good, reviewing articles. Other clean-up tasks that don't require advanced permissions can be left to other editors that routinely improve articles in these ways (creating Talk Pages, specifying projects and ratings, adding categories, etc.) Let's rely on others when it makes the most sense. On the other hand, if you enjoy doing these tasks while reviewing and it keeps you engaged with NPP (or are guiding a newcomer), then by all means continue.
This user script puts a link to the feed in your top toolbar.

Backlog:

Saving the best for last: From a July low of 8,500, the backlog climbed back to 11,000 in August and then reversed in September dropping to below 6,000 and continued falling with the October backlog drive to under 1,000, a level not seen in over four years. Keep in mind that there are 2,000 new articles every week, so the number of reviews is far higher than the backlog reduction. To keep the backlog under a thousand, we have to keep reviewing at about half the recent rate!

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
If you're interested in instant messaging and chat rooms, please join us on the New Page Patrol Discord, where you can ask for help and live chat with other patrollers.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you are no longer very active on Wikipedia or you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, PRehse!

Happy New Year!

PRehse,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 02:12, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023

Hello PRehse,

Backlog

The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to WaddlesJP13 who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day.

2022 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. Rosguill led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js to User:MPGuy2824/MoveToDraft.js

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as Novem Linguae and MPGuy2824 have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 May, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of redirects patrolled and for maintaining a streak throughout the drive. Article patrolling is not part of the drive. Sign up here! There is a possibility that the drive may not run if there are <20 registered participants. Participants will be notified if this is the case.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Afd notice|Tajamul Islam

Nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajamul Islam (2nd nomination) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tajamul Islam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajamul Islam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lethweimaster (talk) 07:44, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023

Hello PRehse,

Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to Hey man im josh who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by Meena and Greyzxq with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of Sam, Jason and Susana, and also some patches from Jon, has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders

Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and #wikimedia-npp ^connect on IRC.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

New pages patrol needs your help!

Hello PRehse,

The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:

There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery at 06:59, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| October 2023 Backlog Drive
On 1 October, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Articles will earn 3x as many points compared to redirects. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol newsletter

Hello PRehse,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November Articles for creation backlog drive

Hello PRehse:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over 1000 pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:24, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 January 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yutaka Kurita

Peter, I know you don't edit WP much any more, but I thought you might be interested in the deletion discussion for the article on Yutaka Kurita. Papaursa (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kurt Holobaugh

I am looking into the history of Kurt Holobaugh, which was deleted several times in the past, and later recreated at Kurt Holobaugh (fighter), from which I have just moved it back to the base page name as a malplaced title. It now seems well-enough supported to me, but MMA isn't my field, and I am dubious about later recreations of previously salted content. What is your impression? BD2412 T 15:48, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:French jujutsuka has been nominated for merging

Category:French jujutsuka has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:10, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

Hello PRehse,

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

New Page Patrol \| May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

New pages patrol \| September 2024 Backlog Drive
On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] t including another ~6,000 redirects

[2] The number of weekly reviews reported in the NPP feed includes redirects, which are not included in the backlog we primarily track.

[a]

[b]