Jump to content

User talk:RileyBugz/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7

Enrique Maximiliano Meza

Abiding abundant blessings to you, esteemed RileyBugz, for wisely restoring article title to its essential and appropriate name: Enrique Maximiliano Meza - by removing unwise, inappropriate and nonsense redirect to Enrique Meza Jr. Humankind is grateful. Viva RileyBugz! Viva WIKIPEDIA! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.146.196.52 (talk) 01:55, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Placeholder

Hello, I removed that edit because it came thru my talk page. Why would it be on my page for removal?

I reverted you because you removed a barnstar from DrStrauss's talk page. Did you mistake his page for yours? RileyBugz会話投稿記録 01:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

I was somehow copied in on his barnstar and I removed it as I had no involvement in it, i dont know why it came up own my talk page

I don't know what you are talking about–I see nothing on your talk page. Also, what do you mean by "copied in on"? I don't see any evidence that you were ever mentioned anywhere in the "Good Article Barnstar" section. Could you please clarify? RileyBugz会話投稿記録 01:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Placeholder 2

Hello, first I apologize if I'm not communicating to you in the correct way, however there were recently made edits to NY Mets Pitcher Kevin McGowan's page. They were removed due to not having any sources, understandably. I can not provide any real citations, however if you can look where my IP address is from (If that's even a thing) you'd see I'm in Nashua, NH where Kevin is from. In fact, he was siting next to me when I made the edits. I can see if I have any old photos laying around that I can upload if it helps prove the info. Thank you!

Well, unfortunately, you'll have to get a published source to be able to add that info. Plus, there are some problems with what you said anyways. First off, it wasn't written like an encyclopedia. For example, don't say hone. I do have one solution, though. If the subject themselves self-publishes something, if there is no doubt that it was written by the person, then you can use it. But, you cannot make any claims that are exceptional (like one that isn't really believable) or any claims about other people (like their parents). So, if you can do that, then add back in the stuff that I didn't say you couldn't with a source (inside ref tags, like this: <ref>Source</ref>). RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:28, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Signature causes lint error

Your signature is causing a newly-identified lint error, Tidy bug affecting font tags wrapping links. The error is that Wikipedia's parser software changes <font>[[foo|bar]]</font> to [[foo|<font>bar</font>]], but as we upgrade to HTML5, the parser software will stop doing that. Your signature also has an unclosed <sub> tag.

Your signature line,

  • <font color="#2D3D67">[[User:RileyBugz|RileyBugz]]</font><sup><font color="#D7000B">[[User talk:RileyBugz|会話]]</font></sup><sub><font color="#D7000B">[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|投稿記録]]</font> (RileyBugz会話投稿記録)

is pre-processed into

  • [[User:RileyBugz|<font color="#2D3D67">RileyBugz</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<font color="#D7000B">会話</font>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<font color="#D7000B">投稿記録</font>]]</sub> (RileyBugz会話投稿記録)

but that preprocessing (except for closing the <sub> tag) will disappear before long.

It's questionable whether it's a good idea to override default link colors, but if you must do so, move the font tags inside the link brackets and after the pipe (|). And, while you are about it, please be aware that <font> tags are deprecated and will eventually be ignored; <span style ...> is used instead. Your sig file, preserving your link color overrides, would be:

  • [[User:RileyBugz|<span style="color: #2D3D67;">RileyBugz</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:RileyBugz|<span style="color: #D7000B;">会話</span>]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/RileyBugz|<span style="color: #D7000B;">投稿記録</span>]]</sub> (RileyBugz会話投稿記録)

Note that the links to your user talk page do not work here because this is already your user talk page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 05:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for taking care of this! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:31, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added Longhair • Megalibrarygirl • TonyBallioni • Vanamonde93
removed Allen3 • Eluchil404 • Arthur Rubin • Bencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Request on 20:08:41, 7 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Mirandafyfe


Hi, many thanks for looking at my draft article on Magog Down. I'm stumped to know where to find what you would class as "a reliable source" for the existence of this piece of land and its name? It was obviously all in the news at the time the land was bought (in 1989) but none of those articles are now searchable online (or not in any simple way that I know of). The land is registered to the charitable company Magog Trust - would you expect a link to the Land Registry? (But they charge for such information, as far as I can tell, don't just leave it searchable.)

Help! TIA.Mirandafyfe (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Mirandafyfe (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

@Mirandafyfe: You don't have to cite something online, but you do need to cite some reliable source. If you can find a source, even if its not online, that supports the existence of this, then you should be good. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 20:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar

Thank you for patrolling new pages! Thanks for helping us out with the backlog. Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:00, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@Insertcleverphrasehere: Thanks! RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:14, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Clarification

Hi, I just wanted to clarify something for you based on your voter guide because you seem to have misinterpreted my comment. You have pointed to a spot on my archive and said that is the block I am standing by. That is not the comment I stand by. It's clear from your statement that you didn't understand my answer. Also, Guy Macon wasn't blocked, and I really have no idea what he's doing in your statement. As for your comment re: antisemitism, can you imagine if someone made a comment about a black, women, Muslim, and that person said, "I don't know if you meant it, but your comment came off as being anti-black, women, Muslim?" Don't you think the civil response would be "I'm sorry, I didn't mean it in any bad way and if you perceive it as such, I apologize and I will edit my comment?" I have emailed that comment and context to many people and 99% of the people shared the concern I had. Regardless, I wanted to set the record straight with regards to the block comment. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@Sir Joseph: In relation to the anti-semitic thing, I was more talking about your tone. Sure, its fine to address those things, but you should have been a bit less accusatory about it (not to justify the other person's comments; they certainly weren't right at all). And, as for Guy Macon, I mentioned him because you 1. implied that you stood by that comment (see Boing!'s 3rd question for you) and 2. never said otherwise. I will remove that, though, since you seem to not stand by it any more. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
My statement about standing by my comment was in regards to my comment that got me blocked, Guy Macon had nothing to do with it. I don't want to mention it or link you to it because I don't want to get blocked again. (Even though I am 100% sure the person I made that comment about could not give one flying Jimbo about my comment. I made a comment about an admin, and another admin blocked me for that comment.) Sir Joseph (talk) 17:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Request on 15:12:56, 21 November 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Sgarg01


Hi there! I got your comment on the draft of the page I've been writing, for Xometry. Thank you for your feedback, I really appreciate it. I've gone in and made edits with more solid news sources including Forbes, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, USA News, and more. Looking at the draft now, is there anything else you would recommend I can edit? Any feedback you could give on this draft would be very helpful for my editing. Thank you so much!

Sgarg01 (talk) 15:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

@Sgarg01: Hello! I declined again; see my comment on the draft for more information. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi there, thanks for your prompt response! I've adjusted for a neutral tone and taken out all press releases. Really appreciate all your help with this. I think the latest draft should be good to go, if you could take a final review - thanks again!!Sgarg01 (talk) 14:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
@Sgarg01: And I've accepted it! Also, thanks for your cooperation with the process; it isn't rare that we get people unwilling to remove promotionalism from their draft just so they can promote their company. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 14:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Evgeny Sklyanin

Hi RileyBugz, I see you declined the above, which puzzles me. For any article on WP:AFC, the passing criteria, if the article is going to deleted in mainspace, then it should be passed. The guy easily passes WP:PROF. Here is his stats from GScholar.

Citations 10099 2344 h-index 36 23 i10-index 50 36

Cited 10099 times. Easily passing WP:BIO. The criteria is, even if it had no references and it is notable, it should pass WP:AFC, as they can be added later. Next please be more careful. scope_creep (talk) 16:48, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Scope creep: That would be a violation of BLP, though, so I would still decline it. I mean, sure, I probably should have added a few references myself, but I don't see how there would be a problem with a decline for a draft in violation of policy. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:54, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
It is not violation of WP:BLP. Please read the front page of WP:AFC. This is what it says at: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions. It says in the coloured box:

If this article were nominated for deletion at WP:AFD, would it be likely to survive?

  • Yes, it will probably be kept. Then ACCEPT it now. (You can tag non-deletion-worthy problems.)

The guy is also memeber of the Royal Society, which is the premier scientific society in the UK. By any definition of WP:AFD, it would have passed an automatic snow keep by everybody. The whole process of WP:AFC is to gate to check articles for notabilty. If they are verifiable, then pushed on. If they are not verifiable, then tag them. It took me a bit, until I went through this process as well. I was hoping to have shiny brand articles out of it, fully ref's and linked, but doesn't work like that. It is much simpler, it is a gate. scope_creep (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

@Scope creep: (by the way, are you watching this page so I don't have to ping you?) I just referenced it... RileyBugz会話投稿記録 17:51, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
Yip. I passed it, and added a reference. scope_creep (talk) 18:00, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Stubs

Hi, can you expand that stub a bit, it's a bit short for the list at present. Thanks for creating it though.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:00, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: Will do. It might take a while, though, since there aren't any more sources in English that I can use, so I will have to find articles in Japanese. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 18:06, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Try to add a few more lines and it should be OK. Thanks!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Eh... I'll just remove it, because I don't think I can expand it enough. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 18:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

05:43:27, 30 November 2017 review of submission by Anaghababy



```` I have added suitable references. I don't understand what is wrong```` ```` I can't add an image for my my infobox.```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anaghababy (talk • contribs) 05:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

@Anaghababy: The problem is that not everything is sourced. Everything should be sourced. Also, the article is promotional, with lots of peacock terms, or words that only serve to promote the subject. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 14:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Hello RileyBugz,

I noticed that you are considering a run for administrator, and I am glad to hear that. I just want to offer a friendly and entirely optional suggestion. There are some editors who object to to signatures that include text not in the Latin alphabet, since they cannot read that text. You may want to think about revising your signature to remove a minor reason to oppose. The decision is your, of course. Good luck! Cullen328 Let's discuss it 17:15, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

If someone is opposing purely because of a few non-Latin characters, their vote should be shown the door. Primefac (talk) 17:35, 30 November 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)
@Cullen328: Thanks, but I would like to keep my signature as is. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 19:22, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

added Joe Roe
readded JzG
removed Ericorbit • Perceval • Thingg • Tristanb • Violetriga

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RileyBugz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

20:32:53, 5 December 2017 review of submission by Lloan


Thanks for reviewing. I submitted a question elsewhere, I believe. Very new to the Wikipedia environment. My question is, would it be possible to get a bit more detail or any tips as far as what you think I should remove from the article? A company that is similar to FBBC has a Wiki page and they ultimately have the same kind of content and we even have similar links -> Orange Theory Fitness. I essentially utilizes Orange Theory's Wiki to create a draft for FBBC. Also, is the graph on the right with the information generated by Wikipedia or is that something we create when viewing the Orange Theory Fitness wiki page, includes their logo?

@Lloan: First off, the Orange Theory Fitness article is a bad model to go off of. As for what you should remove, there are a good amount of things. First, look at this list to see terms that are usually just to promote the subject. If you see any of them in your article, then they should probably be removed. But, I think that your problem is really that the article almost needs to be fundamentally rewritten. If you want an example to go off of, go see the McDonald's article, or something similar, to get an idea of what an acceptable article should look like (although yours certainly doesn't have to be that long). It introduces the subject, tells you who founded it, where, but not why it was founded. As for creating the box at the right, you can fill in a template (Template:Infobox company, in this case) to get it. If you need help with anything else, just ask. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 02:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Unreliable sources

Hi you deleted the section I added to honey in Islam stating that I had unreliable sources. I wanted to ask what about my source was unreliable. It's a book and I believe it's a reliable source. Thank you

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Honey_Prescription.html?id=hVesQl4EBbgC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button Khatijajaffer (talk) 16:20, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

This was the other source a book as well. https://books.google.com/books/about/Sugar.html?id=v_hQDQAAQBAJ Khatijajaffer (talk) 16:23, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Khatijajaffer: It was actually Zefr who reverted your edits. As it happens, I think that your edit should not have been reverted. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:38, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
This edit does not have reliable sources. The book reference, using the word "healing" about honey, is spam (see WP:MEDRS for sources in context of human health), and references to the Quran and an ancient prophet are not reliably objective or documented, i.e., not WP:RS. --Zefr (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
@Khatijajaffer: Ok. Now that Zefr has explained why they reverted your edit, I agree with them. Also, you could add to the paragraph about the Quran that is already there. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 16:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

23:08:29, 7 December 2017 review of submission by Lloan


I have reworked the article, included sources from different news sites and removed anything that sounds subjective. I removed anything that looked like promotional text. Hopefully this is better suited for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lloan (talk • contribs) 23:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

@Lloan: There are still some problems. First off, there are still a lot of unreliable sources, specifically press releases. Second off, there are still some things that aren't very neutral, but this time, it is whole sentences. For example, "The main goal of each session is to burn calories and foster a team environment where each session is both fun and effective", isn't very neutral. Finally, you should not source things like charity work to the subject itself. If they are not mentioned by independent sources, remove them, and if so, cite those sources. Hope that helps. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 22:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, I deleted a few sections (mostly what I did) - removed a few sections that you mentioned too. I really appreciate you taking the time to make sure this meets Wiki's standards by the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lloan (talk • contribs) 03:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

@RileyBugz: Also removed sources that may seem like press releases, some content I can't find appropriate sources for and reworded a few things as well. Not sure what else I can do, but any input you can give me is welcomed. Thanks.
@Lloan: To be honest, the company just doesn't seem to be notable. This basically means that there will probably not be an article until more articles on the company are released and found. You can work on something else in the meantime; I suggest birds, but I love birds, so I might be biased. :) RileyBugz会話投稿記録 12:11, 13 December 2017 (UTC)


@RileyBugz: I see. Just out of curiosity, are the sources I used like 'inc. magazine', 'Fox6Now', 'Fox17', 'wzzm13', 'kdlt', 'entrepreneur' - are any of those suitable? I suppose that's what has me confused the most. This company has appeared on the news all over the place, so I think I'm just really confused, lol. I don't know about birds, but my wife has almost 10 that don't let me sleep, they're always singing. Thanks for your time RileyBugz!
@Lloan: Ahh... I don't have any; I like to just watch how they behave. Anyways, I don't really regard Fox News as a reliable source (and most on the site agree with me on this point). But, you might be able to get it through if you add another source of the quality of the WZZM and KDLT, then you should be good. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 23:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
@RileyBugz: Thanks for pointing those out. Very much appreciated. I managed to find a couple more, ranging from WTOL, WDBJ7, WJLA, Globalnews, WSLS and UTV44. I've added those sources for specific sections: individual location challenges, modified workouts based on fitness level, battle ropes, schedule variations by location, type of workouts, etc. Hopefully these are good enough sources! Then I can move along and start writing about birds! Lol.

Please re-review when you have time. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lloan (talk • contribs) 18:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Almost there... you now have to remove the things that are not sourced to independent sources. The only acceptable use of the company website (at least as I see it) is to establish the name of the company. But, since that doesn't seem to be a problem, that source should be removed, as should the press releases (including what they cite, of course). RileyBugz会話投稿記録 12:02, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
@RileyBugz: I removed external links to Fit Body sites, removed more sources, but the only sources I'm not sure about are Entrepreneur and Inc, 5000. Thank you, let me know if I missed anything. I've learned quite a bit through this process. Specifically researching for sources. Thanks!
Oh, sorry for the late reply. I don't really know about the two sources you mentioned. I'd say they're probably ok, though. Now you need to do a bit of cleanup. You should probably remove some unneeded information, though. For example, one doesn't really need to know what they don't provide (see the second-to-last sentence in franchising). Also, one doesn't need to know when the locations are open. Finally, you need to remove everything that isn't cited by a source. Hopefully that helps. Good luck! RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:03, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
@RileyBugz: Thanks. I removed the content as suggested. Let me know if this is better or what else I can do to get this approved. Happy Holidays!

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

20:51:38, 12 December 2017 review of submission by Golden tamarin


Hi RileyBugz, I've updated the draft and taken some advice from a user in the live help chatroom to remove a potentially problematic section/source. Could you please re-review and let me know what you think/suggest additional changes? Thank you

@Golden tamarin: Hello! It seems that all of the sources are either press releases or don't mention the company, except the fourth citation. This means that you have to find new sources; remember, use reliable sources independent from the company. This excludes write-ups because of financial compensation, and excludes things written by the CEO. Hopefully that helps. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 12:08, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks :@RileyBugz:! Will keep working on it :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Golden tamarin (talk • contribs) 21:11, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Cristmas everybody!!!
Merry Cristmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

N. Jain (talk to me) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

16:18:58, 18 December 2017 review of submission by Golden tamarin


RileyBugz, I had to cut a good amount of the info, but also found a few additional news sources. I re-sourced it all, and will keep an eye out for additional news articles so I can expand the page in the future! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Golden tamarin (talk • contribs) 16:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@Golden tamarin: A bit better, but there is only one reliable source: the TechCrunch article. The first citation doesn't help at all because it only mentions it once, and doesn't even dedicate a full sentence to it. This is the same for the second citation. The third citation is of dubious reliability, and the fourth is just a routine announcement. This doesn't mean that you can't use them all as sources; the first, second, and fourth citation don't need to be removed. But, you need to use more of those independent reliable sources. If you can find one or two more, you should be almost good to go. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:08, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Cristmas everybody!!!
Merry Cristmas everybody!!!

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Adityavagarwal (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.


Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Merry Christmas !!!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello RileyBugz, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018.
Happy editing,
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:38, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Season's Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

Season's Greetings!
Have a good one! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas RileyBugz!!


Hi RileyBugz, I wish you and your family a very Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year,
Thanks for all your help and contributions on the 'pedia! ,
   –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 17:27, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

The white snow and the cool breeze beckon a festive mood,
And the sweet aroma wafting from eateries wreathes the mind.
Lights, stars, colour and jollity abound 'round each bend,
I wish you a happy holiday season, dear friend.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Editing can get tough and frustrating at times, but we've come a long way in this project and that is a grand achievement. Hope you have a good time this festive season! :) Jiten talk contribs 23:54, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wood stork

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wood stork you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shyamal -- Shyamal (talk) 11:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded Anetode • Laser brain • Worm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wood stork

The article Wood stork you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wood stork for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Shyamal -- Shyamal (talk) 03:41, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Fnlayson. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Cuyahoga County Progressive Caucus, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

-Finlayson (talk) 16:42, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Nok (genus)

Hi. Thanks for setting up that redirect from Nok (genus) to P. hualon. I've followed up an earlier note I left on the talk page of the article creator, asking them to supply full details of any published research which demonstrates a legitimately publish new taxon. The abstract mentions a new genus, but doesn't name it od demonstrate a validly published name. If they can't do that, then I'm sure you'd agree the page and redirect needs deleting entirely, as it otherwise gives validity to a genus which may not exist. Conversely, it may be that evidence emerges which shows a valid monotypic genus. I'll keep you informed of any response (or otherwise) that I may get. Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 21:08, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd agree that if they can't even give evidence that the genus is considered valid by anybody, then it should be deleted. Just to be clear, though, the bird WikiProject has a consensus that we should use the IOC binomial and common name. I don't think you were thinking about changing the scientific name in the article on the bare-faced bulbul, but I just wanted to make sure. Thanks, by the way, for informing me! RileyBugz会話投稿記録 21:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you ...

Call of the Wild
Precious six years

... for improving article quality in January 2018! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thanks (although are you sure about the "six years" part? I haven't even been on Wikipedia that long!). RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 16:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for being a bit floppy, just to be short. For a change, I don't say that you are precious so many years, but Precious itself turned six today, - follow the link and browse, - that's what I do when I need inspiration: so many things to be thankful for. That's why I came. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)
Oh, it's fine. I was thinking it might be that (since you seem to have given the first precious out on 30 Jan. Thanks! RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 16:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

Thank You
Thank you for reviewing articles during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive. Always more to do, but thanks for participating. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 05:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
@Insertcleverphrasehere: Thanks! RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 14:51, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Blurpeace • Dana boomer • Deltabeignet • Denelson83 • Grandiose • Salvidrim! • Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!
The NPP backlog at the end of the drive with the number of unreviewed articles by creation date. Red is older than 90 days, orange is between 90 and 30 days old, and green is younger than 30 days.

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
  • We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

  • We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
  • Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

collab?

Hi Rileybugz, do you wanna conom on Red-tailed tropicbird? I was in Norfolk Island recently and saw these close up. I didn't realise what I was looking at for a split second, then I'm thinking, "Hey, it's a tropicbird!!" I have some HANZAB stuff to add and given alot of it will be similar to the other one, it should be straightforward. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 21:45, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Casliber: Yeah! I'd prefer to do the breeding section, as I usually do. I'll email Jimfbleak for HBW, so hopefully I will get started tomorrow or the day after that. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 18:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

DrStrauss is blocked And the Hippos Were Boiled in Their Tanks

  • Back to the main topic, I am the editor on Chinese wiki. In these days, I created the novel. In the Guardian report, there is a place called St Louis, which St Louis?

Kammerer had been Carr's Boy Scout leader in St Louis.[1]

--Beta Lohman (talk) 09:10, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

@Beta Lohman: If somebody just says "St. Louis", it is safe to assume that it is St. Louis, Missouri. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 20:05, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you ...

... for improving article quality in Febuary 2018! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks! RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 14:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
... and in March! Happy Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
... and in June! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:42, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! :) RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 19:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes†
removed AngelOfSadness • Bhadani • Chris 73 • Coren • Friday • Midom • Mike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Looking for a proofreader on diplomatic relations

Hi, RileyBugz. I am here to seek for someone who can proofread the article. It must be a native English speaker and know about some complex diplomacy. Where can I have that guy?--Beta Lohman (talk) 23:37, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

I don't really know, to be honest. You may be able to ask Alex Shih (I don't think he's technically a native speaker, but he has a native-like understanding of it), but he specializes more in military history. I hope that helps. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 22:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...
priority swallows
... you were recipient
no. 1604 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

ACTRIAL - next steps for the Future of AfC & NPP

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your efforts reviewing New Page and AfC submissions and your support for the ACTRIAL initiative.

The conclusion to the ACTRIAL report commissioned by the Wikimedia Foundation strongly reiterates our long-time on going requirements for the NPP and AfC processes to be improved. Within minutes of the trial being switched off, the feed was swamped with inappropriate creations and users are being blocked already.
This is now the moment to continue to collaborate with the WMF and their developers to bring the entire Curation system up to date by making a firm commitment to addressing the list of requirements to the excellent suite of tools the WMF developed for Curation. Some of these are already listed at Phabricator but may need a boost.
The conclusions also make some recommendations for AfC.
A place to discuss these issues initially is here where you are already a task force member.

Wikipedia:The future of NPP and AfC. To opt-out of future mailings, go here. From MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:02, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.
To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

added 331dot • Cordless Larry • ClueBot NG
removed Gogo Dodo • Pb30 • Sebastiankessel • Seicer • SoLando

Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Red-tailed tropicbird

On 7 April 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Red-tailed tropicbird, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the red-tailed tropicbird (pictured) eats mainly flying fish and squid? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Red-tailed tropicbird. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Red-tailed tropicbird), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Never source anything to YouTube?

In your review of Draft:Fixico, you wrote "For example, you should not source anything to YouTube, as it is not a reliable source." How about this example: in covering the first human landing on the moon, Walter Cronkite said, "... it still seems like a dream."[1] In this case, the words are both written and in the video, but it would be a valid reference even if they were in only one or the other. —Anomalocaris (talk) 22:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ Relive! Apollo 11 with Walter Cronkite (anchor of the First Moonwalk), CBS, July 1969. CBS Interactive Inc. March 8, 2015 [1969] – via YouTube.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Chochopk • Coffee • Gryffindor • Jimp • Knowledge Seeker • Lankiveil • Peridon • Rjd0060

Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!
Notability
General notability guideline
Subject-specific guidelines
See also

ACTRIAL:

  • WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

  • Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

  • A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

  • There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

  • Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

  • The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
  • Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

  • A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

  • Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
  • The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Al Ameer son • AliveFreeHappy • Cenarium • Lupo • MichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:00, 1 June 2018 (UTC)

VOLN

>ANN isn't a reliable source Ah yes, a news source, ANN News, isn't reliable- despite the fact that everyone uses it. Ah yes, because it is impossible for me to find other sources that include information on the studio Ah yes, because there aren't other Japanese animation studios that have FEWER sources, something like Nexus. This removal is actually pretty unnecessary. There are pages on Pine Jam, TROYCA, or GoHands? Dude, ANN News is a reliable source because they take information from official sources, in Japanese, and translate them into English for the English speaking audience. The other studios I mentioned aren't deserving of deletion either. Every time you delete VOLN's page I'm just going to remake it with more sources and more information. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 01:03, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Another cool thing to mention is, well, it doesn't really need a stated reason for why it's important. I mean, some anime companies do, some don't. In this case, it really doesn't need it. The works its done, the ones that are linked on Wikipedia, is pretty much enough reason. Having worked on multiple series is info enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcataclysmal (talk • contribs) 01:07, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Also also, look at how easy it is to add other sources like Crunchyroll News and AnimeMojo, amazing isn't it. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 01:17, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

Ah, shit, I sorta messed up. But, regardless, there doesn't seem to be more than quick mentions of the studio. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 01:18, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
It's a newer studio (barely gonna be 4 years), that's probably why. Anyways, I'll keep finding some stuff. Hope the admins don't destroy me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcataclysmal (talk • contribs) 01:20, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry for not posting everything in one post, but since you aren't doing the same, I'm worried about edit conflicts. Anyways, since there isn't any significant mention of the company, it is not really good enough. Although I messed up in saying ANN isn't reliable (although certain parts aren't; see WP:A&M/RS), I feel as if what I have noted above makes the article you created still eligible for speedy deletion. Also, in response to your last comment, I'm not an admin, and the fact that it is young doesn't signal anything bad, it just means is might not be suitable for Wikipedia yet. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 01:22, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
I can still try to avoid a deletion, after all I worked on this for a while, don't want it going to absolute waste :\ Sarcataclysmal (talk) 01:25, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
I think I can understand how you feel, but even if it is deleted, it was most certainly not an absolute waste. I mean, you learned something about Wikipedia's policies, which will help you make better articles. RileyBugz私に叫ぼう私の編集 01:27, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Maybe; might as well try tho — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarcataclysmal (talk • contribs) 01:29, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Well, I survived deletion. Thanks for helping, sort of. Sarcataclysmal (talk) 02:55, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello RileyBugz, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added Pbsouthwood • TheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed Andrevan • Doug • EVula • KaisaL • Tony Fox • WilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed Andrevan • EVula

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RileyBugz/Archive_7&oldid=1079145433"