User talk:Dragodol

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Sabahudin9)
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Sabahudin9, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Sabahudin9! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ushau97 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:40, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 Bosnia and Herzegovina social riots, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8[edit]

Thank you very much for creating some Bosnia related articles ! I would be very grateful if you could create some more, specifically on some well known politicians (crooks) and a certain pedophile priest (Kačavenda).Cheers!

Disambiguation link notification for February 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sead Čaušević, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

1930s actors[edit]

Sadly,I have developed some kind of skin disease and my fingers are ripe red so I don't do a lot of editing these days.Feel free to add her,but make sure to follow the given pattern Name-age-filmography with year.Cheers!--Killuminator (talk) 22:29, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Selam[edit]

Tvoja izmjena na članku Bosnian language nije ok. Vratit ću ono za Havu, a hvala ti što si ispravio worship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MunjaWiki (talkcontribs) 21:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Revert[edit]

Ako još jednom uradiš revert, prijavit ću te za Edit-Warring. Fino ispravi navode, nemoj sve odmah vraćati. Ispada moj trud uzalud. Jer ima još izmjena u tekstu, a ne samo ta gore. --Munja (talk) 23:35, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nasiha Kapidžić-Hadžić may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • *''Pod beharom moje janje spava'' ("My Lamb Sleeps Under the Blossoms"))

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Šefik Bešlagić, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gračanica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 2 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Zdravo jarane[edit]

Vidim da si jako aktivan na ovoj Wikipedia-i, kao i ja, drago mi je i zelim ti se zahvalit za "anti-vandalizam", pokazano u Kingdom of Bosnia artiklu.

Nadam se da cemo zajedno u budcnosti prosirivati i unaprijedjivati artikle vezane za Bosnu i Hercegovinu.

Jos jednom, hvala i veliki pozdrav od Adnana Hz 97 poznat i kao "Hazbualtor". Hazbulator (talk) 20:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Potpisujem :). Kako idu članci ?. --Killuminator (talk) 17:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

the term "Muslim" as an ethnicity is extremely offensive"[edit]

I happened to see the edit summary at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kre%C5%A1evo&curid=2728426&diff=617556472&oldid=617296769

Why do you feel that, and can you corroborate that with some sources?

The existing organic consensus is that Muslims by nationality is a perfectly legitimate anachronistic term used in reference to Yugoslav nationalities. In many years, I've never seen anyone actually make a claim such as yours. (I've seen a fair bit of anonymous vandalism to the effect of swapping one term for the other, but it was never explained.) --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Timeline of Sarajevo may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |year= 1987 |language=Croatian |isbn=8621000997 }} (Sarajevo in the 18th century by contemporary [[:hr:Mula Mustafa Bašeskija|[[Mulla Mustafa Basheski]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:48, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mehmed Alajbegović. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 10:53, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Your edit just demonstrates that you are fixated on having "your way" on this issue, without producing one source. Please lay off and find a source that describes him as Bosniak. I suggest you will find (if he is described) that he is described as a "Bosnian Muslim", as that was the contemporary term and is widely used in the literature. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 11:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Kačavenda[edit]

Vidim da si napokon napravio članak za onog groznog pedofila :D. Srdačno se zahvaljujem. Nezz šta trenutno radiš ali od ovih što ih planiraš mislim da bi super bilo da uzmeš Ismeta Mujezinovića i Nadu Đurevsku kao skorije projekte. Sretno i mnogo pozdrava ! Ah da, danas je konačno lipsao još jedan lešinar ove države ;).--Killuminator (talk) 20:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

Unicode representation of Bosančica[edit]

Greetings. I noticed you reverted my changes on the article Bosnian Church without explanation. I have made a more complete explanation of my edits on the talk page there; the bottom line is that the way Unicode technically works is that it encodes characters, not glyphs, so using ancient Greek and other unrelated characters to represent the glyphs of Bosančica is not a correct implementation of the Unicode standard. if you think I am in error, please join the discussion on that talk page so that the dispute can be resolved rationally. Thank you. Vorziblix (talk) 10:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Your disruptive editing[edit]

LOL. "My nationalist opinion"? You're the one pushing the Bosnian national agenda, maybe without realizing it. And you're way past the three-revert rule already. --JorisvS (talk) 11:34, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring notice[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Bosnian language shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. CodeCat (talk) 12:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 1 October[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Series Lud, zbunjen, normalan[edit]

The last episode of the series is shown on April 7, 2013, what I have written on the page. And you persistently to rewrite the series still aired. --Nn94 14 (talk) 07:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Pitanje[edit]

Ne razumem zasto si nacionalista??? Pa zasto bi davao izvore za nesto sto se podrazumeva? Pa zena je najveci deo zivota provela u Srbiji, tu je napravila karijeru, ima pasos te zemlje (sto nisam siguran za pasos BiH), peva cak i na ekavici i ti ponistavas izmene. Ja ne sporim da je ona bosanska ali treba stajati i srpska. Ovo nije mesto za nacionalisticke ispade, ovde trebamo biti neutralni. Svim etnickim srpskim pevacima iz Bosne, koji se i izjasnjavaju oduvek kao Srbi dodajete prefiks bosanski (negde cak i ostavljate samo bosanski), dok Anabeli koja je celu svoju karijeru napravila u Srbiji, i da nije bilo Srbije ona nikad ne bi ni dobila clanak na ovoj wiki, brisete srpski. Vrlo nacionalisticki od vas Sabahudine.--178.221.137.238 (talk) 15:17, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 18 November[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Po mojoj bašti zumbuli cvjetaju, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hyacinth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Miligram band.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Miligram band.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rotten regard 21:10, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Dragomir Bojanić[edit]

Please move the article Dragomir Bojanić back from Gidra. Wikipedia does not title articles by people's nicknames, and besides, per WP:COMMONNAME he was never referred to as just "Gidra" anywhere. Timbouctou (talk) 20:12, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hanka (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gypsies. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Azra Kolaković, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fatigue. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Gusle[edit]

I just dont get it why are you reverting my changes? If you are adding Bosnian, then we also must add Montenegrin, Macedonian... and Latinica is also Serbian not just Bosnian or Croatian, and Cyrillic that we use here is Serbian Cyrilic by Vuk Karadzic, there is no such thing as Bosnian Cyrilic... Also Serbo-Croatian is a base for all languages here, so i dont know who are you saying that Serbo-Croatian doesnt exists... Also Bosnian language is used only by Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks) and this text has nothing with them... Serbs and Croats from Bosnia already have there languages, for them Bosnian language dont exists.--Bozalegenda (talk) 14:53, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Sanja[edit]

Sources for what??? Sanja Maletic-her name is saying everything... she is not Muslim and we know that Muslims only declare themselves as Bosnian. For Serbs Bosnia is just name of the region where they were born, so they call themselves Bosnian just like someone from Šumadija is Šumadinac or Vojvodina-Vojvodjanin...If you ask any Serb from Bosnia for nationality they will all say that thay are Serbian. Also Sanja Maletic lives in Serbia and even sing on ekavica. I will give you sources but they are unnecessary in this case. Also she is Serb, so her native language could only be Serbian, just like to all other Serbs from Bosnia. How could her native language be Bosnian??? There was no Bosnian when she was in school, there was only Serbo-Croatian, and since she is Serb, her native could only be Serbian.--Bozalegenda (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Man how you dont get it??? Im also Bosnian, but if someone ask me what is my nationality i will say Serbian... For Serbs, Bosnian is just name of the region, and is the same thing as Vojvodjanin, Sumadinac, Dalmatinac, Hercegovac... Also if someone lives in Serbia over 20 years and have Serbian citizenship, and he is ethic Serb you could not change his nationality just because you dont like Serbs. And i asked you here to find a solution, and to avoid edit war, so why you dont want to discuss about this??--Bozalegenda (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

I do not accuse you, but i dont know why are you then making this nationalistic edits? Im not nationalist and i didnt delete Bosnian, i dont have nothing against Bosnians, but i just dont get it why are you deleting correct information that she is Serb... i didnt delete Bosnian i just add her real nationality. In the constitution of BiH clearly said that BiH is country of three nationalites (Bosniaks, Serbs, Croats). So to avoid conflicts and edit war, let just leave Bosnian Serb, most correct information.--Bozalegenda (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

One thing is ethnicity and one thing is nationality. In constitution of BiH, Serbs are one of three nationalities, that is not ethnicity. If she is Gypsy or African, than we could say ethnicity but Serbs are nationality.--Bozalegenda (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Man i explained you so many times... Im also Bosnian, and here in Serbia for all people who are from Bosnia they will say Bosnian, but if you ask them for nationality that wil all say to you that they are Serbian. Bosanac, Hercegovac, Šumadinac, Vojvodjanin, Dalmatinac, Kordunaš that is all just names by regions where people were born, so that is why Sanja called herself as Bosnian, but if you ask her for nationality she will say that she is Serb. And if someone lives in Serbia over 20 years and have Serbian citizenship, he must be Serbian even if he is Romanian, Bulgarian, Hungarian... you can see at many people who lives in America and have American citizenship but they are from some other state, that they are all American-Serbian, American-Bosnian, American-Croatian, American-Polish... So or Bosnian Serb (which is most correct) or Bosnian-Serbian.--Bozalegenda (talk) 16:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

If we are calling Sanja Bosnian, should we than change Jovan Divjak or Goran Karan to Serbian???--Bozalegenda (talk) 17:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Oh man so many times i explained you, but you just dont have brain to realize that!!! Bosnian-name from the region where they were born just like Vojvodjanin, Sumadinac and others... nationality Serbian. Read the constitution of BiH, maybe you will realize than. If someone lives in Serbia and have Serbian citizenship he is Serbian, especially if he is Serb from Bosnia.--Bozalegenda (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Pozdrav![edit]

Vidim da si jako aktivan na en. wiki pa te pitam ako bi mogao ponekad i na bs wiki da prebaciš neki članak diskografije, albuma... itd... Srdačan pozdrav. -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 14:35, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Sladja Guduras.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sladja Guduras.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Redsky89 (talk) 20:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Stoja promo.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Stoja promo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 14:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Dara Bubamara publicity.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Dara Bubamara publicity.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:52, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Seka Aleksic publicity photo.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Seka Aleksic publicity photo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:13, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Marta Savic.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Marta Savic.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:23, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Stoja nije da nije.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Stoja nije da nije.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Milica Pavlovic Dve po dve publicity.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Milica Pavlovic Dve po dve publicity.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:30, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Elvira Rahic.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Elvira Rahic.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Jelena Karleusa 2012.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Jelena Karleusa 2012.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Lepa Brena 2013.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Lepa Brena 2013.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Hamdija Lipovaca.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Hamdija Lipovaca.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 18:40, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Non-free images[edit]

Please note that non-free images of living people used in their biographies is normally considered unacceptable fair use on Wikipedia, particularly for images of active entertainers. Such images are considered to fail WP:NFCC#1 as it is possible to create a free image of the person. This is a well-established principle and is listed in both WP:NFC#UUI and the WMF resolution on licensing as an example of unacceptable fair use. Album covers are generally OK in an article about the album, but cannot usually be used in the artist's article. January (talk) 18:42, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Seka Aleksic publicity photo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Seka Aleksic publicity photo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:50, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:MayaBerovicpromo.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:MayaBerovicpromo.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 15:47, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Stoja - Samo promo pic.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stoja - Samo promo pic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 16:09, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Dado Polumenta.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dado Polumenta.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. January (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Sanja Maletic.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Sanja Maletic.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Maya Sar publicity.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Maya Sar publicity.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MayaBerovicpromo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MayaBerovicpromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ola ola for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ola ola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ola ola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. smileguy91talk 01:47, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rejhan Demirdzic.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rejhan Demirdzic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:32, 4 January 2015 (UTC)

Tvrtko I of Bosnia[edit]

So LUCIEN ELLINGTON (2004). Eastern Europe: An Introduction to the People, Land, and Culture. ABC-CLIO. pp. 633–. ISBN 978-1-57607-800-6.  is a reliable source? Have you ever heard of Source criticism?--Zoupan 07:02, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

I do not understand your "cute"-frenzy. Stop misinterpreting sources, instead, use the article talk page to show your view on the matter. Do not accuse me of "war on Bosniaks and Croats". This is your last warning.--Zoupan 08:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Tvrtko I of Bosnia. Thank you.--Zoupan 15:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Umihanić ?[edit]

Pozdrav, obraćam se na maternjem radi jednostavnosti. Gledam ovaj spisak premijera Tuzlanskog kantona i nisam siguran da li je Umihanić u SDA, štaviše živim u Tuzli :D. Lik je vodio onu ko fol 'ekspertnu vladu' i znam da je ipak bilo neke stranačke pripadnosti ali ne znam detalje, znaš li ti nešto možda više ? --Killuminator (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Damat Ibrahim Pasha[edit]

It is proved that the Turkish term Boşnak was attributed to all inhabitants of the Bosnia Eyalet (= Bosnians), regardless of religion. The Bosniaks, however, is a modern ethnic group. Hence, Ottoman Bosnian Muslims may not be called Bosniaks, although they without a doubt are part of the ethnogenesis of the Bosniaks. The proper categorization would be Category:Ottoman Bosnian Muslims.--Zoupan 19:29, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Do not continue your edit war without discussion.--Zoupan 06:12, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Category:Ottoman Bosnian Muslims is a sub-category of Bosniak history, Bosniaks of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ottoman period in the history of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bosnia and Herzegovina Muslims, Ottoman people by ethnic or national origin; I am not erasing anything.--Zoupan 06:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Dragodol. You have new messages at Talk:Gazi Hüsrev Pasha.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Republika Srpska[edit]

Hello,

I was undoing an unexplained removal from Republika Srpska. Why did you recommit those changes? Stevetauber (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

Ahhhh I see your note now. Good point Stevetauber (talk) 11:22, 22 March 2015 (UTC)

rebellions category[edit]

Hi, since we have some miscommunication, let me explain. The category: Category:Rebellions in Bosnia and Herzegovina is ALREADY in the Category:Rebellions by country. This is the parent category. Therefore, you don't need to also put the article in both categories, because it is already in it. The same way it also doesn't need to be in Category:Rebellions. I hope this is clear. Have a great day! МандичкаYO 😜 11:17, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Nationality[edit]

Please review WP:OPENPARA: we use the nationality held at the time the subject became notable. Also "Russian-American" is ambiguous and has several meanings. Finally, WP:OPENPARA specifically say not to include the country of birth in addition to the nationality held at notability. Skyerise (talk) 02:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Please, revert your edits that violated 3 reverts rule, or you will be reported. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 05:57, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

There is a discussion here that concerns you. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 06:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Sahabudin9, you are warned per the result of this edit warring complaint. See more details HERE (permanent link). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Please,[edit]

Desist from making edits such as this one. That edit exposed an astounding lack of knowledge, lest I say utter ignorance, about Mostar and about Bosnia and Herzegovina, its constitution, its people(s), its language(s), etc:

  1. Being "so few" is what being a minority entails, so the edit summary was absurd semantically as well as factually. Minorities are not insignificant; arguably the most notable Mostarian identified as a Serb.
  2. Bosnian language (the standard variety used by Bosniaks) uses both Cyrillic and Latin alphabet.
  3. The constitution(s) guarantee(s) equal footing to all ethnic groups and all standard varieties of the language known in English as Serbo-Croatian (or Serbo-Croat-Bosnian), thus including both scripts, in all parts of Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Such edits make it very hard to assume good faith on your part. If you intend to contribute to this encyclopaedia, you should bear in mind that blatant chauvinism will not be of much help. Surtsicna (talk) 09:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I do not mind the removal of Serbian Cyrillic from settlements where Serbs do not form a considerable community. I do, however, strongly oppose Sabahudin9's POV-use of "Cyrillic" instead of "Serbian Cyrillic", since this in fact neglects that the Cyrillic in question is the Serbian one.--Zoupan 04:57, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Whether or not Serbs form a considerable community in a given settlement is a far too arbitrary criterium. All standard varieties/languages and both scripts are official throughout the entire state and all three ethnic groups are constitutive throughout the entire state. Simply put, if there is a road sign that reads "Мостар", "Мостар" it should be. Surtsicna (talk) 08:03, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Also, I noted a copy-paste move between Liplje and Liplje (Ljig). Read Wikipedia:How to fix cut-and-paste moves.--Zoupan 05:01, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Liplje, Zvornik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kamenica
Liplje camp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Kamenica

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

The Balkans are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBMAC[edit]

Commons-emblem-notice.svg This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Serbian translations[edit]

Ok. I'm going to try to find a consensus with you over this issue. Towns where Serbs are vast majority or an absolute majority, I'm going to use Serbian cyrillic. This is the most logical solution to me. Where Bosnian Muslims/Bosniaks are majority, you can use Bosnian translation with Bosnian cyrillic if you want. I'll do the same. Is that ok? --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 08:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Any further discussion of the AN3 complaint[edit]

If you have anything more to say about the dispute with User:Yerevani Axjik that was reported at WP:AN3 please continue at User talk:EdJohnston#Bosnian dispute. EdJohnston (talk) 18:47, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring[edit]

Please, will you stop making up the problems as you do? It was already said in the lead of the article Posušje, that the municipality is in Bosnia and Herzegovina, therefore, your point was totally baseless. Refrain yourself from such edits, otherwise, you will be reported. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 13:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Discussing vandalism[edit]

Hello Sabahudin9. Please do not make incorrect charges of vandalism. "Yerevani Axjik: Do not revert my removal of your vandalism. The town is in the country of Bosnia and Herzegovina, which is what it said until you vandalized several days ago". See WP:Vandalism for how that term is defined on Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:11, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Y don't U contribute to Bosnian Wikipedia? --Munja (talk) 00:56, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Dispute Resolution Noticeboard[edit]

Your posting at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard has been archived because it was not made in a proper manner. Manual posting breaks our page formatting and page automation. If you still wish to file a case there, please carefully read the instructions at the top of the page then click the big blue "Request Dispute Resolution" button and fill in the form. Our listing bot will then create a properly-formatted request. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 15:43, 16 April 2015 (UTC) (DRN coordinator) (Not watching)

3RR - Edit warring[edit]

I'll revert your edits on Potočari and Talk:Bosnia Eyalet. Be advised, if you revert me one more time, you'll be braking the three-revert rule. If you do so, you'll be reported for edit warring. --Yerevani Axjik (talk) 23:37, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Bosnian Muslims[edit]

Hi there. I don't want you to feel that I am in any way in denial of the Bosniak people. I've realised that the Bosnian Muslims article may just for one relatively obscure reason stand better in its current condition. This is not just because Islam is practised by non-Bosniaks within BiH but also what many forget that Bosniaks are native to the countries surrounding BiH. The reason I am rasing this with you is because I'd like you to see the edit I made to Bosniaks here. In it I expanded on the inaccuracy of Bosnian Muslim, I hope you see this as consolidation of Bosniak identity rather than its diminishing. Thanks. --Oranges Juicy (talk) 11:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Oranges Juicy :) --Sabahudin9 (talk) 19:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Seka[edit]

Did you take this photograph or download it from facebook? File:Seka Aleksic 2012.jpg. Please clarify in the description.--Zoupan 22:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

If you are indeed the photographer, why did you upload a copy from Facebook instead of your personal, original file? There is no metadata. Delete it/upload the original.--Zoupan 23:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

User Yerevani[edit]

I've also crossed paths with the outrageous POV pusher in question, I can't believe the user has been allowed to take it this far in the first place. Her edits are blatantly tarred with an extreme pro-Serb POV agenda that seeks to undermine Bosnia and Herzegovina in every single manner, whilst promoting the "Serbness" of everything. I've had a word with the User, giving her a fair warning, she has produced tons of evidence that can be easily used against her. Keep an eye out. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 14:55, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

I've started a preliminary discussion here, please have a look. 46.239.102.226 (talk) 16:54, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

User:AnulBanul[edit]

Hi, I wrote my statement. We should also go for WP:ARBMAC and WP:AE. Since I am busy right now, please start the process and I will be involved in help. --Munja-x86 (talk) 11:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Liplje concentration camp rape house.jpg[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Liplje concentration camp rape house.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Memorial for the 27 victims in Liplje.jpg[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Memorial for the 27 victims in Liplje.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Wustenfuchs[edit]

Please see this post. --Potočnik (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Marija Šerifović[edit]

Information icon Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Marija Šerifović. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not misinterpret Muslims by ethnicity with Bosniaks. Unless you have sources of her stating that her father was of "Bosniak" heritage from Vranje, which she did not state in Ispovest (2014). According to the 2002 census, there were 22 Muslims, but only 2 Bosniaks in Vranje.--Zoupan 05:34, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Deletion tags[edit]

Why tag Naum Krnar and Denko Krstić for deletion? I think you are wrong, and have removed the tags. There are sources in the articles.--Zoupan 15:12, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring 2[edit]

I advise you to refrain yourself from edit warring, as I can see your efforts are going in this way. Also... what kind of explanation is "Bosnia is a country, Bosnian is #1", you sound like a child. "My dad is the boss, he's number one"... I mean, what is that? --AnulBanul (talk) 05:00, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

That was taken out of context by you. It clearly said "Why was the Bosnian language moved to the end on an article about a canton in Bosnia-Herzegovina? Don't give me the population excuse. Bosnia is the country. This canton could be inhabited by 7,000,000 Irish people, Bosnian is #1 on the list" You cut out the last part and made it seem that I said something that I didn't. Super cute. It means that the country is called BOSNIA and Herzegovina, therefore a BOSNIAN translation goes first, and if any other language needs a translation, they will follow the Bosnian translation. --Dragodol (talk) 05:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Bosnian translation goes first because Bosnia and Herzegovina is a country? What kind of logic is that? Bosnia and Herzegovina doesn't have official languages, even if it does, Bosnian still wouldn't be numero uno. :D --AnulBanul (talk) 05:04, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
You have no case and no logical argument. Your smiley faces are unprofessional and childish.--Dragodol (talk) 05:07, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
Sorry. Being a Wikipedian is not my profession. Still, would you explain how my case is without any logical argument? --AnulBanul (talk) 05:08, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I am proposing two topic bans to deal with this case. You can reply at AN3 if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 05:21, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

Лепо нас пријави бре... :D --AnulBanul (talk) 23:58, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

AnulBanul, I can read Cyrillic FYI, bre.--Dragodol (talk) 05:55, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
Naravno, pa inače ne bih ostavila poruku. Sad oboje dobivamo ban na tri meseca. Nema veze, dovoljno vremena da ohladimo glave. Ali smešno, malo si se preračunao kad si me prijavio. :D --AnulBanul (talk) 13:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction[edit]

Commons-emblem-hand.svg The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic ban for three months from anything to do with Bosnia and Herzegovina on all pages of Wikipedia, including talk pages and noticeboards

You have been sanctioned because of edit warring and POV pushing on Bosnian topics. See the two reports at AN3.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. EdJohnston (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

This ban expires on 26 August 2015. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)