User talk:StarTrekker
September 2024
[edit]Hi Trekker. While I appreciate you taking time to discuss the AFD, but you should comment on content. I don't appreciate saying my comment "reeks" of anything. Please don't make comments like that again to me or anyone. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:00, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- As a second heads up, I would refrain from discussing what you perceive as editing behaviours or patterns. I don't think I called for any article like this to be deleted in the past and if you propose why you think the article should be kept for reasons that make it cover notability, that's what the discussion is about. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: It is not forbiden to bring up problematic editing behavior from a nominator when it is relevant to the nomination and then clarify what the issue is when they reply. I may have been out of line using the term "reeks", so for that I am sorry. On an unrelated note, I would also appreciate if next time you make sure to add the new section to the bottom of my talk page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 21:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- Completely fair on the top of the page mishap. I posted this from my phone and didn't realize after it shot to the top of the page. If you want to address behaviour, I'd be specific, but honestly, that's probably a seperate argument for a different form. I'd focus on the article and your honest opinion in why it should stay other than and editor made edits you found problematic. Either way, thank you for the apology. Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:30, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: It is not forbiden to bring up problematic editing behavior from a nominator when it is relevant to the nomination and then clarify what the issue is when they reply. I may have been out of line using the term "reeks", so for that I am sorry. On an unrelated note, I would also appreciate if next time you make sure to add the new section to the bottom of my talk page. Thank you.★Trekker (talk) 21:28, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
- As a second heads up, I would refrain from discussing what you perceive as editing behaviours or patterns. I don't think I called for any article like this to be deleted in the past and if you propose why you think the article should be kept for reasons that make it cover notability, that's what the discussion is about. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:12, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
Category:Cultural depictions of Irene Doukaina has been nominated for deletion
[edit]
Category:Cultural depictions of Irene Doukaina has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:14, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction V
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 19 § X in fiction V on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:08, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]| New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive |  |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Happy Holidays!
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XIII
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 December 22 § X in fiction XIII on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 18:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Voting for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023 is now open!
[edit]Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2023! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki . Cast your votes vote here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2023. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]
BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:22, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit].jpg)
"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,
I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.
For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."
Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)
Fylindfotberserk (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.
Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays!
[edit]
P Aculeius (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Robin}} to your friends' talk pages.
P Aculeius (talk) 13:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy holidays to you too! 😃
[edit]
|
Holiday Barnstar |
Hi StarTrekker, Happy Holidays and a Happy New Year 2024 to you too!   ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
|
- What a lovely present @ToBeFree:! Thank you!★Trekker (talk) 13:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays my friend
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Mazewaxie (talk • contribs) 13:38, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Yo Ho Ho!
[edit]
Skyerise (talk) is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Christmas, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec19b}} to your friends' talk pages.
Skyerise (talk) 13:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Seasons Greetings
[edit]
|
Merry Christmas, StarTrekker! Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 14:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC) |
|
Onel5969 TT me 14:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
[edit]
—El Millo (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
—El Millo (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Jerium (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Christmas greetings
[edit]
May the bells of Christmas ring for freedom![1]
May peace be upon us.
And have a happy and prosperous New Year. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 18:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you @7&6=thirteen:, what a lovely message.★Trekker (talk) 19:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ Malpas, Anna (December 24, 2023). "How Ukraine independence song became a Christmas classic". AFP.
Merry Christmas!
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Trailblazer101 (talk) 20:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
[edit]
User:A.S. BrownUser talk:A.S. Brown is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages.
Merry Christmas
[edit]
|
Chris Troutman (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas!
This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. |
Chris Troutman (talk) 22:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Wmas
[edit]
|
|
|
The 12 Days of Wikipedia
|
December greetings
[edit] | |
| December: story · music · places |
|---|
Thank you for your kind message to me. I wish you merry festive days and a peaceful New Year. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:14, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete!
Hello, StarTrekker! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Apologies for just being able to share now. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Favre1fan93: No need to appologise. ❤★Trekker (talk) 02:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
Category:Anthropomorphic caniforms has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Anthropomorphic caniforms has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, StarTrekker
[edit]
Happy Holidays!
[edit]|
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024! |
|
Hello StarTrekker, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Happy New Year, StarTrekker!
[edit]
StarTrekker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:10, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year!
[edit]
Happy New Year!
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year snowman}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.
CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Happy New Year, StarTrekker!
[edit]StarTrekker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
–Davey2010Talk 01:14, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year, StarTrekker!
[edit]StarTrekker,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Mann Mann (talk) 04:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Happy New Year! Here’s to more gnoming.
[edit]
|
Happy New Year! |
Hello StarTrekker: Did you know ... that back in 1885, Wikipedia editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels? Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters. |
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message2pou (talk) 18:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]Joyeux Noël! ~ Buon Natale! ~ Vrolijk Kerstfeest! ~ Frohe Weihnachten!
¡Feliz Navidad! ~ Feliz Natal! ~ Καλά Χριστούγεννα! ~ Hyvää Joulua!
God Jul! ~ Glædelig Jul! ~ Linksmų Kalėdų! ~ Priecīgus Ziemassvētkus!
Häid Jõule! ~ Wesołych Świąt! ~ Boldog Karácsonyt! ~ Veselé Vánoce!
Veselé Vianoce! ~ Crăciun Fericit! ~ Sretan Božić! ~ С Рождеством!
শুভ বড়দিন! ~ 圣诞节快乐！~ メリークリスマス！~ 메리 크리스마스!
สุขสันต์วันคริสต์มาส! ~ Selamat Hari Natal! ~ Giáng sinh an lành!
Весела Коледа! ~ Meri Kirihimete!
Hello, StarTrekker! Thank you for your work to maintain and improve Wikipedia! Wishing you a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- A belated holiday greeting!
ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:56, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ReaderofthePack: Thank you! Cheers to a happy new year of editing.★Trekker (talk) 17:05, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Social class in the Americas
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:Social class in the Americas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:40, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Social class in the Americas has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Social class in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Fictional characters by owner has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Fictional characters by owner has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:41, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Social class in the Americas
[edit]A tag has been placed on Category:Social class in the Americas indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 04:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Request for comment
[edit]See Replacing Current and Currently with As of --Mann Mann (talk) 05:42, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Intersex rights in the Americas has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Intersex rights in the Americas has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 05:44, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome, welcome, welcome! Your work on LGBT-related articles is very commendable, especially because how little editors are working on that area. Since I couldn't get WP:PetScan to run, unfortunately I couldn't suggest to you any articles right now :(. You can try putting "LGBT" in the categories section, adjust the depth to 7, then go to the templates page and put "Unreferenced" in the "has a template:" box to search for uncited articles though. It's complicated I know :). I search for you some articles later in the day if you want some articles to test out your citation skills. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:03, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, PetScan is working again. Here are a few short articles you can try out:
- - CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 07:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks @CactiStaccingCrane:! I'll try to have a look tomorrow to see what work I can do, right now I have to head to bed.★Trekker (talk) 22:51, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Cultural depictions of Louis XV's mistresses has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Cultural depictions of Louis XV's mistresses has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:32, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Horror films by region has been nominated for merging to Category:Horror films
[edit]Category:Horror films by region has been nominated for merging to Category:Horror films. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 01:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Category:Byzantine women
[edit]Your page Category:Byzantine women looks likely to be deleted by speedily renaming the older page Category:Women from the Byzantine Empire over it. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 15:23, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
The name Coraline is actually one that has been invented twice by fictional writers. One source says the French name, with an een ending, was invented for a character in the opera La Toreador in the 1850s. It was later reinvented by Gaiman based on the misprint of Caroline, with the long i ending. In both conttexts, it is an invented name that meets the category. Please do not delete the category again. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome StarTrekker! I'm glad that you are joining the drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
CactiStaccingCrane (talk)15:39, 2 February 2024 UTC [refresh]via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)
Category:Fictional teams has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Fictional teams has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Untitled Powerpuff Girls animated series
[edit]
Hello, StarTrekker. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Untitled Powerpuff Girls animated series, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Page approval
[edit]Hello. I saw you approved some of my newly created pages about inscriptions. I wanted to ask why some of the inscription pages I made have been approved I made in the last week (Zabad inscription, Ruwafa inscriptions, Yazid inscription) but others which were created even before some of these still have not been approved (Jabal Dabub inscription, Ri al-Zallalah inscription, Jebel Usays inscription, Harran inscription, Hima Paleo-Arabic inscriptions, Dumat al-Jandal inscription)? Pogenplain (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Pogenplain:, the reason for this is likely that some of your articles got listed by a bot on a "new pages" notice page that I happen to follow because they contained some key words (probably related to ancient Rome or Greece, since those are the main topics I follow on Wikipedia), it doesn't have anything to do with the quality of the pages or anything like that, all your articles are good as far as I've seen. 🙂★Trekker (talk) 17:02, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you @StarTrekker:. If you do not mind I have created two more inscriptions and these are the last inscription pages I am creating for the foreseeable future so I hope you can review these quickly as well so that I do not encounter the same issue. Umm al-Jimal Paleo-Arabic inscription and Umm Burayrah inscription. Pogenplain (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pogenplain: Done! Thank you for your work on these pages.★Trekker (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker: Thank you and I enjoy it. Are you OK with if I tag you from now on on my talk page about approving new pages I make? I also have now Paleo-Arabic, Ja 1028, DJE 23, Malkikarib Yuhamin. I also changed Judaism in pre-Islamic Arabia from a redirect into its own page do you know who I can ask to get it a content assessment rating? Pogenplain (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pogenplain: I have no problem with you tagging me to review your articles. Ratings tend to be made by persons who are experienced in quality assessing, something that I'm personally not, ut usually takes at most a couple of weeks for someone to come across a new article and rate it.★Trekker (talk) 15:09, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker: Thank you and I enjoy it. Are you OK with if I tag you from now on on my talk page about approving new pages I make? I also have now Paleo-Arabic, Ja 1028, DJE 23, Malkikarib Yuhamin. I also changed Judaism in pre-Islamic Arabia from a redirect into its own page do you know who I can ask to get it a content assessment rating? Pogenplain (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Pogenplain: Done! Thank you for your work on these pages.★Trekker (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you @StarTrekker:. If you do not mind I have created two more inscriptions and these are the last inscription pages I am creating for the foreseeable future so I hope you can review these quickly as well so that I do not encounter the same issue. Umm al-Jimal Paleo-Arabic inscription and Umm Burayrah inscription. Pogenplain (talk) 19:26, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Lists of groups has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Lists of groups has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Fictional code names has been nominated for deletion
[edit]Category:Fictional code names has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:20, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Category:Works about Middle-earth has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Works about Middle-earth has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:45, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorting question
[edit]Just saw this edit, and was curious as to the purpose. Using a space for sorting causes the article to be sorted at the top, but a plus causes it to be sorted under a plus—to no obvious advantage that I can see. However, knowing your usual meticulousness, I thought I'd better ask in case I was missing something. As a rule, I always use a space to have things sort at the top; but perhaps there's a reason for not doing so in this instance. P Aculeius (talk) 01:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @P Aculeius: I tend to use + for related articles which are not lists or the main topic. For example in the case of Category:Ancient Roman censors the Roman censor has a space because it's the main topic, and List of censors of the Roman Republic uses a * because it's a list, using the + makes the Fasti Capitolini get listed third as a related but not essential article for the subject. Other symbols can be used for this as well, for example a lot of people use the minus (-) symbol to categorize templates. It's not a hard rule and if you prefer to use a space you are free to change it back.★Trekker (talk) 03:22, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Children of Ottoman sultans has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Children of Ottoman sultans has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Векочел (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Antón Castillo
[edit]Hi there StarTrekker, I was just wondering whether you might still consider working on the Antón Castillo draft that you have previously contributed to. I feel that Castillo is an important enough character to have his own character article.
I have attempted to contact the user GhostRiver about her helping to edit the article again, but I have not yet received a response. However, I see no harm in asking you to contribute to the article anyway.
Also, would it be a good idea to place a notification on the Video Games WikiProject to see if other editors could contribute to the article? (Oh, and by the way, thanks for the Thanks! I now feel as if I'm the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be.)
Kind regards, Lotsw73 (talk) 13:07, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes. I will gladly help with that.★Trekker (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
DYK for PHerc. Paris. 4
[edit]
On 23 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article PHerc. Paris. 4, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took a particle accelerator and machine-learning algorithms to extract the charred text of PHerc. Paris. 4 without unrolling it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/PHerc. Paris. 4. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, PHerc. Paris. 4), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
WaggersTALK 00:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wow thanks, but I really just made one small edit to it, I'm not sure I deserve credit for this.★Trekker (talk) 11:21, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
[edit]Hello StarTrekker,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]| New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Females/Women at Naming conventions for women in ancient Rome
[edit]Saw you reverted the IP's change this afternoon. I saw it earlier and thought about the same reason you gave, but it seemed nitpicky to me. Yes, women are girls before they're women, but the article is called "naming conventions for women", not "naming conventions for females". And it's just clunky/florid referring to women and/or girls collectively as "females"; Mark Twain poked fun at James Fenimore Cooper for doing this in the nineteenth century. And of course modern distinctions are irrelevant, or we'd be wading into a minefield with questions as to whether all women and girls are female.
Perhaps this is an argument for rewording the sentences. But I think that the simpler solution is to leave it at "women" instead of trying to be technically correct in every possible sense. Also, I had it in mind that at some point this and the main article on Roman names should be merged at a better title... but that's for another time. Again, I chose not to intervene this morning because I thought the edits were probably an improvement, but I'm also not going to revert your changes if you're not convinced. Just explaining why I think they were probably okay. P Aculeius (talk) 23:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I guess that's a fair argument. If someone changes it to women again I wont revert it again.★Trekker (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
DYK for Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One
[edit]On 24 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edgar Wright's pitch for an Ant-Man film in 2006 helped to shape the early films of Phase One of the Marvel Cinematic Universe? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Marvel Cinematic Universe: Phase One), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
DAB to article :)
[edit]Hi. You seem to be into technical stuff, which complements me very nicely, putting it delicately towards myself. I have started the Rehovot-in-the-Negev article from a somewhat illogical redirect, created 10 yrs ago and leading to Rehoboth (Bible). Rehovot-in-the-Negev has NO connection to any of the 3 biblical Rehovot/Rehoboth items. So I feel fine about it in terms of logic. Technically... not so much, as I do know that it shouldn't be done: one puts in an application (I'm always forgetting where), they're wasting time, sometimes somebody opposes out of priciple, eventually the DAB is deleted, and then one can create the article using the vacated name. I did pay attention, have changed/updated all relevant wikilinks etc., but I'm not sure if there isn't some hidden reason why this really isn't the kosher way to do it. Is there a reason? Does some inner Wiki programme/code get confused and the whole project implodes because of me taking a shortcut?
Thanks, Arminden (talk) 21:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Arminden: As far as I'm aware there is no strict rule against doing what you did (turning a redirect into its own article) and if you have indeed checked all the wikilinks then there shouldn't be a problem.★Trekker (talk) 21:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! It's good to hear. Have a great day/night. Arminden (talk) 21:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Potaissa Sphinx statue, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Torda.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Category:Lists of films by date has been nominated for merging
[edit]Category:Lists of films by date has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, @StarTrekker— I was just working with the page for this obscure 3rd-century person, and saw that you’d added the line He was the last family member of an emperor to be deified posthumously
, a designation I’d previously seen applied to Valerius Romulus. The fact was added at least a year ago, but do you remember from whence it originated? Since we’ve previously interacted, I figured I’d ask you directly rather than going through the article’s talk page. ManuelKomnenos (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @ManuelKomnenos: Oh darn, I really can't remember, I must have forgotten to add a souce. If it is true that Valerius Romulus was then the line should probably be removed.★Trekker (talk) 13:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @StarTrekker Thanks! I’m going to investigate more before altering anything (I need to hunt down the book that told me Romulus was the last), but wanted to start by checking with you. ManuelKomnenos (talk) 13:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 29 § Works about same-sex sexuality
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 May 29 § Works about same-sex sexuality on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 22:57, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Proposed updates for Dark Castle Entertainment
[edit]Hi StarTrekker, I am trying to update the Dark Castle Entertainment article. I see that you are a member of WP:HORROR, and as Dark Castle has produced many horror films, I hope you will consider implementing the edit request I posted at Talk:Dark Castle Entertainment#Proposed updates. Thanks for your help, DJ for Katz (talk) 15:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of LGBT in Israel for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBT in Israel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.--MikutoH talk! 23:52, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
June 2024
[edit]
Please do not delete or alter legitimate talk page comments from other editors, as you did at Talk:Witchcraft. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 19:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Skyerise: I was intending to correct Dimadick's "The last think we need" comment. I screwed up and accidentally made a nonsense edit. My bad.★Trekker (talk) 20:06, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't get to "correct" any other editor's comments. That is their sole discretion. Skyerise (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Skyerise: Well I would be glad if someone else corrected my typos but ok if those are Wikipedia rules then I wont again.★Trekker (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks! Skyerise (talk) 20:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- Late to the table, as I came here to ask about something else, and saw this. I believe there are certain cases where modifying another editor's comments is acceptable: for example, formatting errors causing broken links, re-indenting replies to place them in the proper location/order without materially affecting their contents, moving talk page references, etc. WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS provides further examples, more clearly than I could have. Fixing someone's typo may fall under the heading of "potentially irritating" at the top, but I would have to judge that on a case-by-case basis when it comes to editors who regularly interact with one another. This warning seems a bit strongly worded given the circumstances. Butting out now. P Aculeius (talk) 11:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Skyerise: Well I would be glad if someone else corrected my typos but ok if those are Wikipedia rules then I wont again.★Trekker (talk) 20:09, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
- You don't get to "correct" any other editor's comments. That is their sole discretion. Skyerise (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
All these years I still can't get my mind around categories
[edit]Why is Pinxton Castle not in Scheduled monuments in Bolsover? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Doug Weller:, I'm a little unsure what you mean, it doesn't seem to me that a category exists for that subject.★Trekker (talk) 10:03, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- Nah, ignore me, there isn't one. Sorry. Doug Weller talk 11:08, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Adding Roman gentes to WikiProject Genealogy?
[edit]I see you added the WikiProject Genealogy banner at Talk:Hostia gens. I wonder whether it makes sense to include Roman gentes under this heading, as I would not have expected to find them there. There are over a thousand articles on Roman gentes now, and while many of them mention how some members are related to one another, they were not intended to constitute genealogical topics, and most do no more than connect a few immediate family members who are so identified in the inscriptions that attest their existence. The major families sometimes do include tables (mostly against my better judgment, but other editors have added them and I did not want to fight over the subject; I also created or edited a couple), but even so the heading "genealogy" suggests a different scope and purpose than the one intended, and possibly a link with Descent from antiquity, which I regard as a very dubious field that has occasionally come into discussion in Roman articles.
Now, I don't mean to suggest for a minute that genealogy is a dubious field; I'm a genealogist myself, and perhaps there's some intersection between my interest in genealogy and that in Roman gentes and the names they used. But I try to keep these topics strictly separate—as a rule I don't even venture into genealogy on Wikipedia, though I may refer to articles on historic events or persons while working on genealogy. And I think that my concern may be motivated by worries that someone will come along and start tagging Roman gentes for deletion on the grounds that as genealogical articles they would fail general notability guidelines (in fact, even before today I've wondered whether this might happen; CGR currently has some editors who apply policy very strictly and seem to have a narrow view of what should and shouldn't be here.)
Since "Hostia gens" certainly isn't likely to show up in anyone's "descent from antiquity", it seems as though WikiProject Genealogy would apply equally to all other articles on Roman gentes, and that prospect worries me for the above reasons. Is there something I'm not aware of here? Is this a good idea? P Aculeius (talk) 11:44, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
- I understand your arguments @P Aculeius:. Personally I find gentes to be of prosopographical interest, but I understand your concern over focus and genealogical notability standards. I will probably refrain from adding the project to future articles.★Trekker (talk) 15:23, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Untitled Jimmy Woo series
[edit]
Hello, StarTrekker. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Untitled Jimmy Woo series".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:53, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Drag (entertainment)-related categories
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 29 § Drag (entertainment)-related categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 22:42, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Lost Mysteries for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lost Mysteries (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 21:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Home video line
[edit]Hey Trekker, I don't disagree that the Universal Monsters is more than a home video line anymore, but it does not mean it isn't one. I feel as if this edit edit, suggests otherwise. I don't really want to debate it, but I don't think this category limits it. Up to you, but I just want to assume this wasn't removed from spite or anything. We should also probably add Category:Image Comics titles as well for the comic books. Thoughts? Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Personally I find it to be non-defining. While there are several home video lines (some of which might deserve articles of their own considering that they have won awards) I don't think the concept as a whole can be considered a home video line, it's simply to narrow. For the same reason I don't agree with adding any comics categories to the article either, such categories belong either on articles for the comics or on redirects if the series are not notable enough for their own articles. It is absolutely not a mater of spite, I hold no resentment towards you at all! I very much admire an appreciate a lot of work you have done on horror articles on Wikipedia. (I just think you have an odd problem with this specific subject).★Trekker (talk) 12:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Good points.I think Universal Monsters is probably a bigger concept than home videos or comics as the article goes into that now. my heart is more interested in content than esoteric categorization at the moment. Thanks for the kind words too. I've been having a lot of self-doubts about my actions or inaction as if late so it's really good to hear something not entirely negative. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:24, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Mother of Nymphidia?
[edit]While checking the sources for Nymphidia, I looked for epigraphy before finding the Plutarch reference in PIR, and found this sepulchral inscription from Tarraco in Hispania Citerior: "D(is) M(anibus) / Nymphidiae / Callistus / contub(ernali) aman/tissimae de se me/ritae fecit". It's undated, but the juxtaposition of "Nymphidia" and "Callistus" seems unlikely to be a coincidence. Perhaps it accounts for the confusion about how they were connected.
But assuming that Plutarch is right, and that Callistus' daughter was named "Nymphidia", might this be her mother, buried in Spain? Of course what you or I think is irrelevant in itself, but if you've been working on these persons or their family, perhaps one of your sources was aware of this inscription. It would certainly be relevant to the "origins" section if a scholarly source is even willing to speculate on it, though without one I doubt the wisdom of mentioning it, as tempting as it seems to draw such a connection. P Aculeius (talk) 20:53, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- This is amazing @P Aculeius:! I never cease to be impressed by your ability to find and navigate epigraphs! And I'm inclined to agree, I think it's very plausible that this is indeed Nymphidia ("the Elder") the mother of Nymphidia the mother of Gaius Nymphidius Sabinus. I tried googling around to find any mention of it in literature but it doesn't seem like any reliable source has made the connection. Too bad.★Trekker (talk) 23:01, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
- It's mainly a matter of knowing how to enter the right stems in the search window of the Clauss–Slaby Datenbank, then narrow down the results using the browser's search window. In this case, I searched for "Nymphidi" knowing that that would pick up any inscriptions that were known for anyone in this gens; it would have been harder with a much more common name, since fifty-odd inscriptions came up. Then I searched the results for "Callist", and spotted this one right away.
- My theory was that the relationship was established by epigraphy, which would be cited in PIR, but I thought I'd check the C–S Datenbank first since countless inscriptions have been uncovered or re-evaluated since PIR was published. But since the inscription didn't support the original text, I double-checked PIR to see what it was based on, and found the citation to Plutarch (not sure why I didn't cite that to begin with, but it was cited in the following entry). I don't know if the original entry was wrong because the relationship was misstated in my source, or if I saw the inscription and had a mental slip with "contubernalis". Probably the former, but I didn't try to track down every possible explanation.
- Thank you for keeping an eye on Roman gentes, and correcting mistakes when you find them! P Aculeius (talk) 23:49, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
One line graffiti articles
[edit]Hello. I saw you removing my proposal for deletion on some one-liner articles like Graffiti in Boston, saying that the article being short is not a reason for deletion. But the problem is also notability - by this measure, every city in the world could have a similar article, because every city has at least a few news articles discussing graffiti. -- NotCharizard 🗨 10:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Notcharizard: I agree that could be somewhat problematic, but I would regard it as a larger issue of Wikipedia in general, by our current GNG one could argue that every city should have an article like that, similar to how there are dozens of article like marriage in Spain (marriage in location foo) that consist of a broad topic and a location. Maybe a solution could be to merge the small articles into a larger one like Art in Boston.★Trekker (talk) 11:04, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is graffiti in the United States which is a nice article I'd be happy to try and add in some state sections that the smaller city articles could be merged into (I'm not from the USA so would need to do some background research first). I've genuinely tried to do some research into graffiti in those towns as graffiti a topic I'm interested in, but it's difficult to find anything to build an article on that's not generic. -- NotCharizard 🗨 11:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Notcharizard: It's a decent idea, but one might argue that graffiti in the United States is almost too broad to include all the information on each city, but on the other hand if all the information is very generic as you say, a lot of it might be able to be condensed into the US article. A couple of merge discussions (or a centralised on on the US article talk page) might be best, in that way the original creator might want to explain if they have a plan to expand these articles or if a merge is for the best.★Trekker (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense - thank you for the advice, and thank you for explaining so clearly and kindly! It is very appreciated. -- NotCharizard 🗨 14:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Notcharizard: No problem!★Trekker (talk) 14:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- That makes sense - thank you for the advice, and thank you for explaining so clearly and kindly! It is very appreciated. -- NotCharizard 🗨 14:24, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Notcharizard: It's a decent idea, but one might argue that graffiti in the United States is almost too broad to include all the information on each city, but on the other hand if all the information is very generic as you say, a lot of it might be able to be condensed into the US article. A couple of merge discussions (or a centralised on on the US article talk page) might be best, in that way the original creator might want to explain if they have a plan to expand these articles or if a merge is for the best.★Trekker (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
- There is graffiti in the United States which is a nice article I'd be happy to try and add in some state sections that the smaller city articles could be merged into (I'm not from the USA so would need to do some background research first). I've genuinely tried to do some research into graffiti in those towns as graffiti a topic I'm interested in, but it's difficult to find anything to build an article on that's not generic. -- NotCharizard 🗨 11:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 17 § Virgin Mary in art
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 August 17 § Virgin Mary in art on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 16:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Box sets
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Category:Box sets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 January 3#Category:Box set albums. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]| New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Voting for coordinators is now open!
[edit]Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
"411Mania" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect 411Mania has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 1 § 411Mania until a consensus is reached. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:24, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!
[edit]Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 28 § Transgender by country
[edit]A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 September 28 § Transgender by country on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 01:18, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Pete Wilson (wrestler) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Wilson (wrestler), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Wilson (wrestler) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
File:Stu Hart vs Bengal Tiger.jpg tagged for speedy deletion
[edit]
I see you're currently active on the project, so as a courtesy, I'm letting you know about a non-free file you uploaded. Non-free files are supposed to be subject to strict scrutiny. It's obvious that the editors who specialize in that area are derelict in their duty, however. For a file of this type, the standard has been to discourage including this content simply to pretty up an article, that the existence of sourced critical commentary is necessary to accompany the image. I went through as many links as I could find on the relevant articles and only found mere mentions in blog posts. If you know of better sources, feel free to add them before the file is deleted. Thank you for your attention in this matter. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 19:01, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Replaceable non-free use File:Wrestler Stu Hart wearing an amateur wrestling championship belt, sometime between 1933 and 1936.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Wrestler Stu Hart wearing an amateur wrestling championship belt, sometime between 1933 and 1936.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of LGBTQ in California for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBTQ in California until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.--MikutoH talk! 23:06, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe music has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Marvel Cinematic Universe music has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 17:50, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
"Joaquin Salamanca" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
The redirect Joaquin Salamanca has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 29 § Joaquin Salamanca until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 07:39, 29 October 2024 (UTC)