User talk:Timothyhouse1

Welcome!

Hello, Timothyhouse1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --119.74.47.12 21:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

RE: Trams in Singapore

Hi, regarding your edits on the wiki page; Trams in Singapore.

"Re-introduction plans (future):

   Tampines Tram (along Pasir Ris, Tampines North, Tampines, Simei & Bedok)
   Woodlands Tram (along the Woodlands area)
   Jurong Regional Tram, in place of Jurong Region Line"

Please kindly provide the relevant references to support the claims. Without proper official references, it would mislead others on the your claims. The places you have mentioned will be covered by future MRT lines, and there are no plans on re-introducing trams back in Singapore, based on current MasterPlan 2013 and LTA. Unless you can provide reference sources, you may feel free to edit your posts again. =) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.255.2.50 (talk) 09:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expressway speed limits - do not make false claims!

Your recent edits of the following articles, namely the East Coast Expressway, New Klang Valley Expressway, North–South Expressway Southern Route, North–South Expressway Northern Route, North–South Expressway (Malaysia), Malaysian Expressway System, and National Speed Limits (Malaysia), have been undone due to the false claims regarding the expressway speed limit of up to 130 km/h. Please bear in mind that there is no such evidence that proves your claims.

You can read this news entry that proves that Malaysia has never approved any speed limits higher than 110 km/h.

Therefore, do not attempt to make such false claims like this without any solid evidence to support your claims. Thank you. - Hezery99 (talk) 13:07, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copy / Paste Plagiarism of third party content

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you.

Amendments to HarbourFront Bus Interchange, Shenton Way Bus Terminal , Queen Street Bus Terminal , Lorong 1 Geylang Bus Terminal , Kent Ridge Bus Terminal, Buona Vista Bus Terminal, Serangoon Bus Interchange, Bukit Batok Bus Interchange, Bukit Merah Bus Interchange and Toa Payoh Bus Interchange (all relating to bus stations in Singapore) were found to be plagiarised word-for-word from Public Transport SG without acknowledgement.

Wheelandaxle293 (talk) 09:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to London Buses. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 10:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of planned cities, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Clementi, Woodlands and Bishan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reason for removing bus fleet info on SBS Transit and SMRT Buses

Hi. May I have a reason why you do not want bus fleet info on those pages? Please reference the necessary articles on wikipedia that says to remove such info. Pls give me a reply by 11th December 2359H or your changes will be reverted. Thanks Funkyspyspy (talk) 06:18, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"According to the "Editing bus pages" section that I have rolled out to those bus fans:" What "Editing bus pages" section can that be found? Please quote, and I know it's a problem of wikipedia's policy on reliability. Funkyspyspy (talk) 10:59, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What rights do you have to change how wikipedia works by your own will? Funkyspyspy (talk) 11:14, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

Hello, I'm DAJF. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mercedes-Benz O405, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DAJF (talk) 01:03, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asian Highway Network, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merak. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to List of bus routes in Singapore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:43, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Internet censorship in Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Time Crisis 5 for console

Hi, i've just edited out your additions to the Time Crisis (series) page as i feel they're probably made-up. May i ask you if it's really like i think, or you have solid sources? This reminds me of previous edits on the Time Crisis page when another guy posted various hoaxes about the game getting remade and a sequel sometime in 2012, for console. Your info sounded like something i would find on a crappy site like KDramaStars, no offense.

EDIT: oh, nevermind, looks like you're the same guy from the first Time Crisis page. Both of you have a IP from Singapore. Rest assured that i'll do my best to remove all your hoaxes.

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive editing by User:Timothyhouse1. Thank you. (This is a procedural notice; I have no opinion on the issue.) Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 23:39, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Development of Windows Vista

I've rolled back your deletion of the content of this article. An edit summary consisting of "fancruft" really isn't a solid enough reason to throw away researched, sourced articles that document a period of time in the development of a piece of software used by literally billions of people. It was also a major tech news story at the time, easy as that may be to forget some 12 years on. Use WP:AFD to propose outright deletion of articles in the future. Thanks. Warren -talk- 01:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Queenstown and Sam Tan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punggol Way

The article Punggol Way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable street-not every street on the planet needs a wiki page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wgolf (talk) 21:20, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve SG50

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Timothyhouse1, thanks for creating SG50!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. /

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:08, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of SG50

A tag has been placed on SG50, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 08:23, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 Hong Kong protests

A tag has been placed on 2015 Hong Kong protests requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://time.com/3918681/hong-kong-protest-democracy-umbrella-revolution-occupy/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SomeoneNamedDerek (talk) 18:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Malaysia Airlines destinations, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:21, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Singaporean general election, 2017, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inderjit Singh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:TnG card.gif

Thanks for uploading File:TnG card.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 313@Somerset

A tag has been placed on 313@Somerset, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.malls.com/sg/malls/313-somerset.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 01:39, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dennis Trident 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Stevens, Little India and Newton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

Apologies for this reversion on Choa Chu Kang -- you haven't done anything wrong, my finger slipped when pressing the rollback button on Special:RecentChanges. Sorry! ^My^name ^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 08:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Penny Low, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chief of Defence Force. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tanjong Pagar Group Representation Constituency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henderson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Outram Park MRT Station

Hi, I caught you want to add something on Thomson-East Coast MRT Line information layout on Outram Park MRT Station, as you did that it never construction yet but however you do not put in any reliable source, what happen if is in Island Platform but not stacked side. As you did it was stacked side platform.

It is ok to remove this page, so long you follow instructions on Wikipedia. Thanks by 119.74.47.12 on 12 October 2015 at 21:56

Your edit on Volvo Super Olympian

Hi, The next I am tired to tell you that your thing you did was possible vandalism that your are talking about North East MRT Line and deregistering which causes upsetting people, as you did not follow the rules, this means you did not put in any of the reliable source to edit.

It is ok to remove this page, so long you follow knstructions on Wikipedia. Thanks by 119.74.47.12 on 12 October 2015 at 22:19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.47.12 (talk) 14:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What I think this user above meant was this: " Hello, I'm Epicgenius. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Volvo Super Olympian, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. " But that doesn't matter anyway, since your edits looked fine. Plus, you're a pretty established editor, so basically, just add reliable sources and you will be fine. Epic Genius (talk) 01:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Thomson Group Representation Constituency

added a link pointing to Thomson

Tiong Bahru Group Representation Constituency

added a link pointing to Henderson

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve History of the Berlin U-Bahn

Hi, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. Timothyhouse1, thanks for creating History of the Berlin U-Bahn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add references from reliable sources to the article to meet our verifiability requirements.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 14:06, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 24 October

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Munich S-Bahn page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically, there are now three occurrences of <ref name="kvr Chronicle"/>. Kindly supply the ref you had in mind for this. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:17, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bus transport in Berlin

added a link pointing to MAN

History of the Berlin U-Bahn

added a link pointing to Ruhleben

Munich S-Bahn

added a link pointing to Push-pull

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Alexander Dennis Enviro500

Hi, you made a change of an article called Alexander Dennis Enviro500 right? Let me tell you are mixing up those bus operators which you put Tower Transit Singapore at SMRT Buses portion. And if you this happens right, you will be placed at the new page, Government Contracting Model to contrast as Normal Public Buses. Understand you want to answer for Loyang Bus Package right? Let me tell you they are not announced yet and those will usually handover from SBS Transit, unless if Tower Transit Singapore by Loyang Bus Package, you can be placed.

It is ok to remove this page, so long you follow the Wikipedia Rules, unsigned comment by 119.74.47.12 on 10 November 2015 at 12:57 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.74.47.12 (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DRG Class ET 125, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zehlendorf. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Year's Eve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jubilee Bridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to Downtown Line stations

Hi, I noticed you put first and last train timings for the DTL 2 stations. I was wondering where you got that timings from so that I wouldn't revert your edits. Thanks. 33ryantan (talk) 14:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of bus routes in Singapore, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 11:07, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to SBS Transit. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 17:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Woodlands Bus Depot. Charles (talk) 09:43, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chronology of the Malaysian Expressway System, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page North-South Expressway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at SMRT Buses, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 08:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to North East MRT Line. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Class455fan1 (talk) 15:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at SBS Transit. Charles (talk) 20:58, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:32, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just had to trawl through and remove your unsourced claims on List of twin towns and sister cities in the United Kingdom you added some time ago that some Singaporean cities were twinned with London towns, which they are not. They can be confusing to anyone who looks at this page, including me. This is your final warning, If i catch you or see you being warned for adding unsourced content again, I will haul you straight to the Administrators noticeboards (Either ANI or AIV). You have been warned numerous amounts of times to stop adding unsourced content and yet you persist in doing so.Please remember to cite your sources whenever you add information. I suggest you have a read of WP:VERIFY. Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 19:45, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Timothyhouse1 persistently adding unsourced content despite many warnings. Thank you. Class455fan1 (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did warn you and yet your still adding unsourced content, so now you find yourself being taken to ANI. Class455fan1 (talk) 11:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:02, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:01, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mass Rapid Transit (Singapore). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Chenzw Talk 13:54, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. This is your very last warning. You've been repeatedly asked to discuss and reference your edits, and you have not done so. If you add unsourced content again, you face an indefinite block from editing. I urge your to heed the advice given to you and to begin editing in a collaborative manner with appropriate references to your edits. Katie^talk 22:57, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more disruptive edit, such as adding nonsensical content to various pages, such as shopping malls and cinemas without a valid source, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia forever. Razerby^talk 19:01, 24 September 2016 (SGT)

Nomination of Hokkien profanity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hokkien profanity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hokkien profanity until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Doug Weller talk 13:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Timothyhouse1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Katie^talk 21:06, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ang Mo Kio Avenue 8

The article Ang Mo Kio Avenue 8 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since 2014, this is a minor local road and doesn't satisfy WP:GEOROAD. I don't see any other cultural/historical significance either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lemongirl942 (talk) 17:29, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hougang 1

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hougang 1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Boleyn (talk) 11:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AH374

A tag has been placed on AH374 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:14, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AH374

The article AH374 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:15, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AH374 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AH374 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AH374 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nightfury 13:28, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AH374 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AH374 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AH374 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jc86035 (talk) 16:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AH368 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AH368. Since you had some involvement with the AH368 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Jc86035 (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1988

Template:Singaporean general election, 1988 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1984

Template:Singaporean general election, 1984 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1980

Template:Singaporean general election, 1980 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1976

Template:Singaporean general election, 1976 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:05, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1972

Template:Singaporean general election, 1972 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singaporean general election, 1968

Template:Singaporean general election, 1968 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:06, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Singapore general election, 1991

Template:Singapore general election, 1991 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Buangkok Green

The article Buangkok Green has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Woodlands Road, Singapore

The article Woodlands Road, Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bukit Panjang Road

The article Bukit Panjang Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:58, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simei Avenue

The article Simei Avenue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:02, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Commonwealth Avenue West

The article Commonwealth Avenue West has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Central Boulevard, Singapore

The article Central Boulevard, Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sembawang Road

The article Sembawang Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:07, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punggol Road

The article Punggol Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Upper Changi Road East

The article Upper Changi Road East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:11, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jurong West Avenue 2

The article Jurong West Avenue 2 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R22-3877 (talk) 02:46, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boon Lay Way

The article Boon Lay Way has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. R22-3877 (talk) 01:57, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Klang Valley MRT lines

Template:Klang Valley MRT lines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 23:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of bus routes in Bangkok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bus routes in Bangkok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of bus routes in Bangkok until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuicoleJR (talk) 13:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]