Bhonsle (clan)
 | This article's factual accuracy is disputed. (November 2022) |
| House of Bhonsle | |
|---|---|
 Rajmudra (Royal Seal) of Shivaji I | |
 Bhagwa Dhwaj, the flag of the Maratha Empire | |
| Parent house | Sisodia dynasty (claimed) |
| Country | Modern Day India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh |
| Place of origin | Pune, Maharashtra, India |
| Founded | 1576 |
| Founder | Maloji Bhosale, a predominant general of Malik Ambar |
| Current head | Udayanraje Bhosale (Satara branch) Shahu II (Kolhapur branch) |
| Final ruler |
|
| Titles | List
|
| Style(s) | Chhatrapati Raja Jagirdar Patil |
| Motto | हर हर महादेव "Har Har Mahadev" ("Praises to Shiva") |
| Estate(s) |
|
| Deposition | List
|
| Cadet branches | |
| History of India |
|---|
 |
| Timeline |
| History of South Asia |
|---|
_without_national_boundaries.svg) |
The House of Bhonsle (or Bhonsale, Bhosale, Bhosle)[1] are a prominent Indian royal house. They claimed descent from the Sisodia Rajputs but were likely Kunbi tiller-plainsmen.[2][3]
They served as the Chhatrapati or Emperor of the Maratha Confederacy from 1674 to 1818, where they gained imperial dominance of the Indian Subcontinent. They also ruled several states such as Satara, Kolhapur, Thanjavur, Nagpur, [4] Akkalkot,[5] Sawantwadi[6] and Barshi.[7]
The House of Bhonsle was founded in 1576 by Maloji Bhosale, a predominant general or sardar of Malik Ambar of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate.[8] In 1595 or 1599, Maloji was given the title of raja by Bahadur Nizam Shah, the ruler of the Ahmadnagar Sultanate.[9] He was later granted was given the jagir of Pune, Elur (Verul), Derhadi, Kannarad and Supe. He was also given control over the first of the Shivneri and Chakan. These positions were inherited by his sons Shahaji and Sharifji, who were named after a Muslim Sufi Shah Sharif
Origins
Earliest members
The earliest accepted members of the Bhonsles are Mudhoji Bhonsle and his kin Rupaji Bhonsle, who were the village headman (pāṭīl) of Hingani — this branch has been since known as Hinganikar Bhonsles.[10] A branch seem to have split soon, who went on to claim an ancestral right to the post of district steward (deśmukhī) of Kadewalit: Suryaji Bhonsle during the reign of Ahmad Nizam Shah I (early 1490s), and his son Sharafji Bhonsle during the conquest of the region by Daniyal Mirza (1599).[10][a][b] This branch has been since known as Kadewalit Bhonsles.[10]
The next significant Bhonsle was probably Maloji Bhosale from the Hinganikar branch.[11] He was the great-grandson of one Kheloji (c. 1490).[11]
In the opinion of Jadunath Sarkar and other scholars, Bhonsles were predominantly Deccani tiller-plainsmen from the Shudra caste; they were part of the Marathas/Kunbis, an amorphous class-group.[12][3][13][14][c] Scholars have however disagreed about the agricultural status of Bhosles.[11] Rosalind O'Hanlon notes that the historical evolution of castes grouped under the Maratha-Kunbis is sketchy.[15] Ananya Vajpeyi rejects the designation of Shudra, since the category has remained in a state of flux across centuries; she instead notes them to be a Marathi lineage, who enjoyed "reasonably high" social status as landholders and warlords, being in the service of Deccan Sultanate or Mughals.[11][d]
According to R. C. Dhere's interpretation of local oral history and ethnography, Bhonsles descend from the Hoysalas and Yadavas of Devagiri, who were cow-herding Gavli sovereigns.[11][16][e][f] In early thirteenth century, "Baliyeppa Gopati Sirsat", a Hoysala cousin of Simhana migrated from Gadag to Satara along with his pastoral herd and kul-devta; the Sambhu Mahadev was thus installed at a hill-top in Singhnapur.[11][g][h] Historical records indicate that this shrine received extensive patronage from Maloji onwards.[11][i] Further, there exists a branch of the Bhosles named "Sirsat Bhosles" and Bhosle (or "Bhosale") is linguistically similar to "Hoysala".[11] M. K. Dhavalikar found the work to convincingly explain the foundation of the Bhosle clan (as well as Sambhu Mahadev cult).[17] Vajpeyi too advocates that Dhere's theory be probed in greater detail — "[f]rom pastoralist big men to warlords on horseback, is not an impossible distance to cover in two to three centuries."[11]
Shivaji's Coronation
By 1670s, Shivaji had acquired extensive territory and wealth from his campaigns.[3][18] But, lacking a formal crown, he had no operational legitimacy to rule his de facto domain and technically, remained subject to his Mughal (or Deccan Sultanate) overlords; in the hierarchy of power, Shivaji's position remained similar to fellow Maratha chieftains.[3][11][18][j] Also, he was often opposed by the orthodox Brahmin community of Maharashtra.[11] A coronation sanctioned by the Brahmins was thus planned, in a bid to proclaim sovereignty and legitimize his rule.[3][18][20]
On proposing the Brahmins of his court to have him proclaimed as the rightful king, a controversy erupted: the regnal status was reserved for those belonging to the kshatriya varna.[21][22] Not only was there a fundamental dispute among scholars on whether any true Kshatriya survived in the Kali Yuga,[k] having been all destroyed by Parashurama but also Shivaji's grandfather was a tiller-headman, Shivaji did not wear the sacred thread, and his marriage was not in accordance with the Kshatriya customs.[18][20][23] Thus, the Brahmins had him categorised as a shudra.[18][20]
Compelled to postpone his coronation, Shivaji had his secretary Balaji Avji Chitnis sent to the Sisodiyas of Mewar for inspection of the royal genealogies; Avji returned with a favorable finding — Shahji turned out to be a descendant of Chacho Sisodiya, a half-Rajput uncle of Mokal Singh.[11][l] Gaga Bhatt, a famed Brahmin of Banaras,[m] was then hired to ratify Chitnis' find, and the Bhonsles were now permitted to stake a claim to Kshatriya caste.[25][11][22][n] The coronation would be re-executed in June 1674 but only after going through a long list of preludes.[11][o]
Led by Bhatt, who employed traditional Hindu imagery in an unprecedented scale, the first phase had Shivaji penance for having lived as a Maratha despite being a Kshatriya.[11][18][27] Then came the sacred thread ceremony ('maunjibandhanam') followed by remarriage according to Kshatriya customs ('mantra-vivah') and a sequence of Vedic rituals before the eventual coronation ('abhisheka') — a public spectacle of enormous expense that heralded the rebirth of Shivaji as a Kshatriya king.[11][p] Panegyrics composed by court-poets during these spans (and afterward) reinforced onto the public memory that Shivaji (and the Bhonsles) indeed belonged from the Sisodiyas.[11][22]
However, the Kshatriyization was not unanimous; a section of Brahmins continued to deny the Kshatriya status.[28] Brahmins of the Peshwa period rejected Bhatt's acceptance of Shivaji's claims and blamed the non-dharmic coronation for all ills that plagued Shivaji and his heirs—in tune with the general Brahminical sentiment to categorize all Marathas as Shudras, carte-blanche; there have been even claims that Bhatt was excommunicated by Maratha Brahmins for his role in the coronation of Shivaji![23] Interestingly, all claims to Rajput ancestry had largely vanished from the family's subsequent projections of identity.[11]
Accuracy
Vajpeyi notes the "veridical status" of Chitnis' finds to be not determinable to "historical certainty" — the links were tenuous at best and inventive at worst.[11] Shivaji was not a Rajput and the sole purpose of the lineage was to guarantee Shivaji's consecration as a Kshatriya, in a tactic that had clear parallels to Rajputisation.[11][q] Jadunath Sarkar deemed that the genealogy was cleverly fabricated by Balaji Awji and after some reluctance accepted by Gaga Bhatt, who in turn was "rewarded with a huge fee". V. K. Rajwade, Dhere, Allison Busch, John Keay and Audrey Truschke also agree with Sarkar about the fabrication.[14][29][27][22][30] G. S. Sardesai notes that the descent is "not authentically proved".[31][r] Stewart N. Gordon does not pass any judgement but notes Bhatt to be a "creative Brahmin".[11][18][s] André Wink deems that the Sisodia genealogical claim is destined to remain disputed forever.[25][t]
Establishment
Origins
The Maratha Empire was established by Shivaji I the grandson of Maloji in 1674. This was established to invasions from the Mughal Empire and the Bijapur Sultanate. Shivaji's forces initially occupied the Fort of Torna in 1642. He had expanded his kingdom to Raigad by 1674.[citation needed] he crowned himself He was crowned as Chhatrapati, meaning emperor.
Shivaji wanted to establish his government based on his Philosophy of Hindavi Swarajya. (The Rule of the People) This advocated for more representation of the people and less power of the elites. He later established the Ashta Pradhan, (Modern council of ministers) an institution of a council of eight ministers to guide the administration of his nascent state. Each of the ministers was placed in charge of an administrative department; thus, the council heralded the birth of a bureaucracy. Shivaji appointed Moropant Trimbak Pingle as the Peshwa, the leader of the council. [32]
Shivaji was succeeded by his son Sambhaji I. In early 1689, Sambhaji and his commanders met at Sangameshwar. Mughal forces, under Emperor Aurangzeb attacked Sangameshwar when Sambhaji was accompanied by just a few men. Sambhaji captured by the Mughal troops on 1 February 1689. Aurangzeb had charged Sambhaji with attacks by Maratha forces on Burhanpur.[citation needed] He and his advisor, Kavi Kalash, were taken to Bahadurgad by the imperial army, where they were executed by the Mughals on 21 March 1689.[citation needed]
After the execution of Sambhaji, Rajaram I was crowned at Raigad on 12 March 1689. During the Mughal started siege on Raigad on 25 March 1689, the widow of Sambhaji (Maharani Yesubai) and Peshwa Ramchandra Pant Amatya sent young Rajaram to the stronghold of Pratapgad through Kavlya ghat.[citation needed] Rajaram to escape through Kavlya ghat to the fort of Jinji through the Pratapgad and Vishalgad forts, Rajaram reached Keladi in disguise and pursued assistance from Keladi Chennamma - who kept the Mughal attack in check to ensure safe passage and escape of Rajaram to Jinji where he reached after a month and a half on 1 November 1689.[citation needed]
Aurangzeb sent Uzbek general Ghazi-ud-din Firoze Jung against the Marathas in the Deccan. He then sent Zulfiqar Khan Nusrat Jung to capture the Jingi Fort. He laid siege to it in September, 1690. After three failed attempts, it was finally captured after seven years on 8 January 1698. Rajaram, however, escaped and fled first to Vellore and later to Vishalgad. Rajaram returned to jinji and occupied the fort 11 November 1689, but left before it fell in 1698, setting up his court at fort Satara. Then, Maratha commanders, Santaji Ghorpade and Dhanaji Jadhav, defeated the Mughal forces, therefore cutting off their lines of communication in Jingi.[citation needed]
Kolhapur Branch
In 1707, Mughal Emperor Muhammad Azam Shah released Shahu Bhosale, the son of Sambhaji. However, his mother was kept as a hostage of the Mughals, in order to ensure that Shahu adhered to the release conditions. Immediately the Maratha throne was claimed his aunt Tarabai, claiming the throne for her son Shivaji II. After his victory at the Battle of Khed, Shahu established himself at Satara, forcing her to retire with her son to Kolhapur. This resulted in the creation of the Kolhapur branch in 1709 under Tarabai, splitting from the main Satara branch under Shahu.. Shivaji II and Tarabai were soon deposed by Rajasbai, the other widow of Rajaram. She installed her own son, Sambhaji II as the new ruler of Kolhapur.[33] Sambhaji then made alliance with the Nizam.[34] The defeat of the Nizam by Bajirao I in the Battle of Palkhed in 1728 led to the former ending his support for Sambhaji.[35] Sambhaji II signed the Treaty of Warna in 1731 with his cousin Shahuji to formalize the two separate seats of Bhonsle family.[34][36]
Maratha Confederacy
Confederacy era
 |
Shahu appointed Balaji Vishwanath a member of the Bhat Family as his Peshwa. The Peshwa was instrumental in securing Mughal recognition of Shahu as the rightful heir of Shivaji and the Chhatrapati of the Marathas. Balaji also gained the release of Shahu's mother, Yesubai, from Mughal captivity in 1719.
The Peshwas later became de facto rulers of the Maratha Empire. Under the Peshwas, Chhatrapati was limited to simply a monarchial figurehead. Maratha Empire dominated most of the Indian subcontinent.
Under the Peshwas the Marathas expanded to their greatest extent. 1737, Under Bajirao I invaded Delhi in a blitzkrieg manner at the Battle of Delhi (1737).[37][38] The Nizam set out from the Deccan to rescue the Mughals from the invasion of the Marathas, but was defeated decisively in the Battle of Bhopal.[39] The Marathas extracted a large tribute from the Mughals and signed a treaty which ceded Malwa to the Marathas.[citation needed] The Battle of Vasai was fought between the Marathas and the Portuguese in Vasai, a village lying on the northern shore of Vasai creek. (Part of modern day Mumbai)[40]
After Shahu's death, he was succeeded by Rajaram II When Peshwa Balaji Baji Rao left for the Mughal frontier, Tarabai urged Rajaram II to remove him from the post of Peshwa. When Rajaram refused, she imprisoned him in a dungeon at Satara, on 24 November 1750. She claimed that he was an imposter from Gondhali caste and she had falsely presented him as her grandson to Shahu.[41] His health deteriorated considerably during this imprisonment. On 14 September 1752, Tarabai and Balaji Rao took an oath at Khandoba temple in Jejuri, promising mutual peace.[42] Nevertheless, the Peshwa retained Rajaram II as the titular Chhatrapati and a powerless figurehead.[citation needed]
Peshwa Bajirao and his three chiefs, Pawar (Dhar), Holkar (Indore), and Scindia (Gwalior), expanded it northwards up to Peshawar. He also expanded it up to Kaveri river.[citation needed]
Nagpur Branch
After the death of Chand Sultan, the Gond ruler of Deogarh, in 1739,[43] there were quarrels over the succession, leading to the throne being usurped by Wali Shah,[44][45][46] an illegitimate son of Bakht Buland Shah. [44][47] Chand Sultan's widow Ratan Kunwar invoked the aid of the Maratha leader Raghoji Bhonsle of Berar in the interest of her sons Akbar Shah and Burhan Shah. Wali Shah was put to death and the rightful heirs placed on the throne. Raghoji I Bhonsle was sent back to Berar with a plentiful bounty for his aid.[48] Raghoji then declared himself the King of Nagpur and the 'protector' of the Gond king. Thus in 1743, Burhan Shah was practically made a state pensionary, with real power being in the hands of the Maratha ruler. After this event the history of the Gond kingdom of Deogarh is not recorded.[49]
During Shahu's reign, Raghoji Bhosale of Nagpur expanded the empire Eastwards, reaching present-day Bengal. Khanderao Dabhade and later his son, Triambakrao, expanded it Westwards into Gujarat.[citation needed] In the Battle of Damalcherry in 1740, which was a major confrontation with the Nawab of the Carnatic, Dost Ali Khan . Raghoji was victorious and increased Maratha Influence in the Carnatic. [50][51][52]
after the successful campaign in Carnatic at the Battle of Trichinopolly. Raghoji invaded Bengal. Raghoji was able to annex Orissa and parts of Bengal permanently as he successfully exploited the chaotic conditions prevailing in the region after the death of their Governor Murshid Quli Khan in 1727.[53] Nawab of Bengal ceded territory up to the river Suvarnarekha to the Marathas, and agreeing to pay Rs. 20 lacs as chauth for Bengal (includes both West Bengal and Bangladesh) and 12 lacs for Bihar (including Jharkhand), thus Bengal becoming a tributary to the Marathas.[54]
After Raghoji's death, he was succeeded by his son Janoji Bhonsle. Janoji was involved in wars between the Peshwa and the Nizam of Hyderabad. The nizam united against him and sacked and burnt Nagpur in 1765. On Janoji's death on 21 May 1772, the Battle of Panchgaon was fought over succession, until Mudhoji Bhonsle was victorious. In 1785 Mandla and the upper Narmada valley were added to the Nagpur dominions by treaty with the Peshwa. Mudhoji also had close ties with the British East India Company. Mudhoji was succeeded by Raghoji II. he who acquired Hoshangabad and the lower Narmada valley. In 1803 he united with Daulat Rao Sindhia of Gwalior against the British, and their alliance with Nizam Ali Khan of Hyderabad. The British and the Nizam were victorias at the battles of Assaye and Argaon, and signed the Treaty of Deogaon of that year Raghoji ceded Cuttack, southern Berar, and Sambalpur to the British, although Sambalpur was reconquered by 1806 by Raghoji. Raghoji II was deprived of a third of his territories, and he attempted to make up the loss of revenue from the remainder. The villages were mercilessly rack-rented, and many new taxes imposed. At the same time the raids of the Pindaris commenced. In 1811 they advanced to Nagpur and burnt the suburbs. Raghoji rebuilt many of the damaged village and forts. On the death of Raghoji II in 1816, his son Parsoji was supplanted and murdered by Mudhoji II Bhonsle, In 1817. A treaty of alliance providing for the maintenance of a subsidiary force by the British was signed in this year, a British resident having been appointed to the Nagpur court since 1799. In 1817, on the outbreak of war between the British and the Peshwa, Appa Sahib threw off his cloak of friendship, and accepted an embassy and a title from the Peshwa. His troops attacked the British, and were defeated in the action at Sitabuldi, and a second time close to Nagpur city. The remaining portion of Berar and the territories in the Narmada valley were ceded to the British. After the Third Anglo-Maratha War, Nagpur was under a under a subsidiary alliance with the British. Appa Sahib was reinstated to the throne, but shortly afterwards was discovered to be again conspiring, and was deposed and sent to Allahabad in custody. Raghoji II was succeeded by Raghoji III. he ruled Nagpur under a with the British resident Richard Jenkins. Raghoji died on 11 December 1853 without a male heir. Nagpur was annexed by the British under the doctrine of lapse. The former kingdom was administered as Nagpur Province, under a commissioner appointed by then Governor-General of India, James Broun-Ramsay.[citation needed]
Thanjavur Branch
|
The Bhonsoles were also influential in the Carnatic Region. In 1675, the Sultan of Bijapur sent a force commanded by the Maratha general Venkoji a half-brother of the Shivaji, to Capture the city of Thanjavur and Established the Thanjavur Maratha Kingdom. Venkoji defeated Alagiri, and occupied Thanjavur. He did not, however, place his protege on the throne as instructed by the Bijapur Sultan, but seized the kingdom and made himself king. Thus began the rule of the Marathas over Thanjavur. Vyankoji also allied with Chokkanatha of Madurai to repulse an invasion from Mysore.
Shivaji Maharaj also invaded Gingee and Thanjavur in 1676–1677 and made his brother Santaji the ruler of all lands to the north of the Coleroon.
Princely States
Satara State, Kolhapur State, Thanjavur State, Nagpur State, [4] Akkalkot State,[5] Sawantwadi State[6] and Barshi[7] were amongst the prominent states ruled by the Bhonsles.
List of Members
|
Maratha Empire
| Image | Name | Birth | Reign | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shivaji I | 19 February 1630[55] | 1674–1680 | 3 April 1680 | |
|
Sambhaji I | 14 May 1657 | 16 January 1681 – 11 March 1689 | 11 March 1689 | |
|
Rajaram I | 24 February 1670 | 11 March 1689 – 3 March 1700 | 3 March 1700 | |
|
Shivaji II | 9 June 1696 | 1700 – 1707, 1710 – 1714 (Kolhapur State) | 14 March 1726 | |
|
Shahu I | 18 May 1682 | 12 January 1707 – November 16, 1713 | 15 December 1749 | Became a Puppet ruler under Balaji Vishwanath in 1713. |
Maratha Confederacy
| Image | Name | Birth | Reign | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Shahu I | 18 May 1682 | November 16, 1713 – 15 December 1749 | 15 December 1749 | Became a Puppet ruler under Balaji Vishwanath in 1713. |
|
Rajaram II | June 1726 | 15 December 1749 – 11 December 1777 | 11 December 1777 | |
| Shahu II | 1763 | 11 December 1777 – 3 May 1808 | 3 May 1808 | ||
|
Pratapsingh | 18 January 1793 | 3 May 1808 – 3 June 1818 | 14 October 1847 | Last Chhatrapati of the Maratha Confederacy |
Satara State
| Image | Name | Birth | Reign | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Pratapsingh | 18 January 1793 | 3 June 1818 – 5 September 1839 | 14 October 1847 | |
|
Shahaji | 1802 | 5 September 1839 – 5 April 1848 | 5 April 1848 |
Kolhapur State
| Image | Name | Birth | Reign | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Tarabai | 1675 | 1709 – 1710 (Unofficial) | 1761 | Established the Branch of Kolhapur. |
|
|
Shivaji I | 9 June 1696 | ,1710 – 1714 | 14 March 1726 | First Official Raja of kolhapur. |
.jpg)
|
Sambhaji II | 1698 | 1714–1760 | 18 December 1760 | |
|
Shivaji III | 1756 | 22 September 1762 – 24 April 1813 | 24 April 1813 | |
| Sambhaji III | 1801 | 24 April 1813 – 2 July 1821 | 2 July 1821 | ||
| Shivaji IV | 1816 | July 2, 1821 – Jan 03 1822 | January 3, 1822 | ||
| Shahaji I | 22 January 1802 | 3 January 1822 – 29 November 1838 | 29 November 1838 | ||
|
Shivaji V | 26 December 1830 | 1838–1866 | 4 August 1866 | |
|
Rajaram II | April 13, 1850 | August 18, 1866 – November 30, 1870 | November 30, 1870 | |
|
Shivaji VI | April 5, 1863 | 1871–1883 | December 25, 1883 | |
|
Shahu IV (overall)Shahu I of Kolhapur | 26 June 1874 | 2 April 1894 – 6 May 1922 | 6 May 1922 | |
|
Rajaram III | 31 July 1897 | 1922–1940 | 26 November 1940 | |
|
Shivaji VII | 22 November 1941 | 31 December 1941 – 28 September 1946 | 28 September 1946 | |
|
Shahaji II | 4 April 1910 | 1947–1971 | 9 May 1983 |
Nagpur state
| Image | Name | Birth | Reign | Death | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Raghoji I | 1695 | 1739 – 14 February 1755 | 14 February 1755 | First Bhonsle ruler of Nagpur. |
|
Janoji | 14 February 1755 – 21 May 1772 | 21 May 1772 | ||
|
Mudhoji I | 21 May 1772 – 19 May 1788 | 19 May 1788 | ||
|
Raghoji II | 19 May 1788 – 22 March 1816 | 22 March 1816 | ||
| Parsoji | 1788 | 22 March 1816 – 2 Feb 1817 | 2 Feb 1817 | ||
|
Mudhoji II | 1796 | 2 Feb 1817 – 15 Mar 1818 | 15 Mar 1818 | |
|
Raghuji III | 1808 | 15 Mar 1818 – 11 Dec 1853 | 11 Dec 1853 | Last Bhonsle ruler of Nagpur. |
See also
Notes
- ^ The precise familial relation between Mudhoji/Rupali and Suryaji is unclear.
- ^ Stewart Gordon and other scholars deem the "deśmukhī" to have served as a 'hinge' between the local populace and the imperial authority which frequently changed. Without their loyalty, commanding authority in newly conquered territories was difficult.
- ^ Susan Bayly and Eraly however emphasize that the Marathas were located outside the peripheries of Brahminism and people thereof did not form any rigid caste.[3][13]
- ^ Vajpeyi however notes that the Bhonsles almost-certainly never featured in the traditional list of 96 families, which allegedly composed the Maratha identity.
- ^ This was published in "Sikhar Singanapurca Sri Sambhu Mahadev" (2002) for the first time.
- ^ The caste-status of these Yadavas and whether they were a part of Bahminical hiearchy is disputed.
- ^ The Hoysalas as well as the Yadavas were competing feudatories of the Chalukyas with battles being as much common as matrimonial alliances.[11] The migration was prob. motivated by pervasive droughts in the region and an opportunity to seek out some independence for himself.[11]
- ^ The shrine continues to serve as one of the most significant Shaivite shrine in modern Maharashtra.[16]
- ^ Texts produced under patronage of Shahaji make explicit connection between the Bhosales and Balip. Also, the "samadhi" (memorial) of Sambhaji, Shivaji, and Shahuji neighbor the shrine.However, for a span of about 250 years — from Balip to Kheloji — the history of the shrine is not clear.
- ^ Most of the great Maratha Jahagirdar families in the service of Adilshahi strongly opposed Shivaji in his early years. These included families such as the Ghadge, More, Mohite, Ghorpade, Shirke, and Nimbalkar.[19]
- ^ Madhav Deshpande notes that one of the oldest texts in support of such a viewpoint was drafted by Kamalakara Bhatta, a paternal uncle of Gaga Bhatta.However, he was hardly a radical (unlike Nagesbhatta, to whom even the Rajputs were Shudras) and allowed expiatory rites for the rare "fallen" Kshatriya-Shudras, provided he did not exceed the upanayana age-limit of 22 years. In his judgement, he was following his father Ramkrsna Bhatta as well as grandfather Narayana Bhatta.
- ^ Chacho was born of a Khati concubine and in contemporary times, was pejoratively referred to as a khātanvālā.[24] People like Chacho were categorized into separate caste-groups at the lower end of the hierarchy—even unfit for inter-dining with—, and excluded from Rajput ganayats.[24]
- ^ Gaga Bhatt was a preeminent legal scholar, whose scholarship focused on the relative status of different varnas across different regions. Shivaji was already in contact with him since 1664, when he was asked to adjudicate upon whether the Saraswat Brahmins (then, Syenavis) were indeed Brahmins.[23] It is very plausible that the idea of coronation was Bhatt's suggestion — during the previous encounter, he had already proclaimed Shivaji to have born into a "pure royal family."[23]
- ^ Susan Bayly views the episode to reflect fluidity in the caste system.[25]
- ^ Contemporary Dutch East India Company archives[26] indicate that even then, Shivaji's upgradation of status was only accepted by Brahmins after he had promised them to not rule tyrannically anymore.[25]
- ^ The expense was huge enough to impose a coronation tax on his subjects for the next few years.
- ^ She however cautions that the summary rejection of Shivaji's ancestry claims in contemporary historiographical literature often stemmed from a Brahminical anti-Maratha perspective, imbibed from the Peshwas.[11]
- ^ Sardesai noted that the claims were supported by some 'firman's in possession of the Raja of Mudhol but many scholars [unidentified] considered them to be forged.
- ^ Gordon however points out that Shivaji might have "thought of himself as a Rajput" since long back. He evidences a letter (1656) sent by Shahji to Adil Shah II where they had boasted of Rajput pride and another letter (18 July 1666) from Parkaldas (an officer under Jai Singh) to Kalyandas, where three Rajput chieftains are noted to be admiring of Shivaji as a great Rajput with all the "characteristic qualities." Vajpeyi interprets the former use to signify an exalted royal status rather than any connection with the Rajput clans. A. Sievler deems the latter translation to be dubious; Mehendale comments that "Rajput" simply meant a Kshatriya in the context. In another contemporary source—a letter from Jai Singh himself to his Prime Minister—, we see Shivaji being regarded to belong from a low caste (and pedigree), who was not even fit for inter-dining with Rajputs.
- ^ In a footnote, Wink mentions of two letters before the coronation ceremony, where Shivaji had referred to himself as a Rajput.
References
- ^ Kulkarni, Prashant P. (6 June 1990). "Coinage of the Bhonsla Rajas of Nagpur". Indian Coin Society.
- ^ Singh K S (1998). India's communities. Oxford University Press. p. 2211. ISBN 978-0-19-563354-2.
- ^ a b c d e f Bayly, Susan (22 February 2001). Caste, Society and Politics in India from the Eighteenth Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge University Press. pp. 57–59. ISBN 9780521798426.
- ^ a b Nicholas Patrick Wiseman (1836). The Dublin Review. William Spooner. Retrieved 11 January 2015.
- ^ a b Kulkarni, Sumitra (1995). The Satara Raj, 1818-1848: A Study in History, Administration, and Culture. Mittal Publications. ISBN 9788170995814.
- ^ a b "Portuguese Studies Review". International Conference Group on Portugal. 6 June 2001.
- ^ a b "The Gazetteers Department". akola.nic.in.
- ^ Chintaman Vinayak Vaidya (1931). Shivaji: the founder of Maratha Swaraj. C. V. Vaidya. pp. 10–15. Retrieved 8 October 2012.
- ^ Joseph G. Da Cunha (1900). Origin of Bombay.
- ^ a b c Vendell, Dominic (2018). Scribes and the Vocation of Politics in the Maratha Empire, 1708-1818 (Thesis). Columbia University.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x Vajpeyi, Ananya (2005). "Excavating Identity through Tradition: Who was Shivaji?". In Varma, Supriya; Saberwal, Satish (eds.). Traditions in Motion: Religion and Society in History. Oxford University Press. pp. 239–268. ISBN 9780195669152.Edited version of Ananya, Vajpeyi (August 2004). "Making a Śūdra King: The Royal Consecration of Shivaji". Politics of complicity, poetics of contempt: A history of the Śūdra in Maharashtra, 1650–1950 CE (Thesis). University of Chicago. p. 155-226.
- ^ Christophe Jaffrelot (2006). Dr Ambedkar and Untouchability: Analysing and Fighting Caste. Permanent Black. p. 39. ISBN 978-81-7824-156-2.
Obviously, Ambedkar had in mind the Brahmin's refusal to recognize Shivaji as a Kshatriya. His theory, which is based on scant historical evidence , doubtless echoed this episode in Maharashtra's history, whereas in fact Shivaji, a Maratha-Kunbi, was a Shudra. Nevertheless, he had won power and so expected the Brahmins to confirm his new status by writing for him an adequate genealogy. This process recalls that of Sanskritisation , but sociologists refer to such emulation of Kshatriyas by Shudras as ' Kshatriyaisation ' and describe it as a variant of Sanskritisation.
- ^ a b Abraham Eraly (2000). Emperors of the Peacock Throne: The Saga of the Great Mughals. Penguin Books India. p. 435. ISBN 978-0-14-100143-2.
- ^ a b Jadunath Sarkar (1992). Shivaji and His Times. Orient Longman. p. 158. ISBN 978-81-250-1347-1.
- ^ O'Hanlon, Rosalind, ed. (1985), "Religion and society under early British rule", Caste, Conflict and Ideology: Mahatma Jotirao Phule and Low Caste Protest in Nineteenth-Century Western India, Cambridge South Asian Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–14, ISBN 978-0-521-52308-0, retrieved 12 July 2021
- ^ a b Feldhaus, Anne (2003), Feldhaus, Anne (ed.), "The Pilgrimage to Śiṅgṇāpūr", Connected Places: Region, Pilgrimage, and Geographical Imagination in India, Religion/Culture/Critique, New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, pp. 45–87, doi:10.1057/9781403981349_3, ISBN 978-1-4039-8134-9
- ^ Dhavalikar, M. K. (2000). "Review of SHIKHAR SHINGANAPURCHA SRI SHAMBHU MAHADEV (In Marathi)". Bulletin of the Deccan College Research Institute. 60/61: 507–508. ISSN 0045-9801. JSTOR 42936646.
- ^ a b c d e f g Gordon, Stewart (1993), "Shivaji (1630–80) and the Maratha polity", The Marathas 1600–1818, The New Cambridge History of India, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–87, ISBN 978-0-521-26883-7, retrieved 26 June 2021
- ^ Daniel Jasper (2003). "Commemorating the 'golden age' of Shivaji in Maharashtra, India, and the development of Maharashtrian public politics". Journal of Political and Military Sociology. 31 (2): 215. JSTOR 45293740. S2CID 152003918.
- ^ a b c Baviskar, B. S.; Attwood, D. W. (30 October 2013). "Caste Barriers to Initiative and Innovation". Inside-Outside: Two Views of Social Change in Rural India. SAGE Publications. p. 395. ISBN 978-81-321-1865-7.
- ^ Rajmohan Gandhi (1999). Revenge and Reconciliation. Penguin Books India. pp. 110–. ISBN 978-0-14-029045-5.
- ^ a b c d Busch, Allison (2011). Poetry of Kings: The Classical Hindi Literature of Mughal India. Oxford University Press. pp. 190–191. ISBN 978-0-19-976592-8.
- ^ a b c d Deshpande, Madhav M. (2010). "Kṣatriyas in the Kali Age? Gāgābhaṭṭa & His Opponents". Indo-Iranian Journal. 53 (2): 95–120. ISSN 0019-7246.
- ^ a b Kothiyal, Tanuja (14 March 2016). Nomadic Narratives: A History of Mobility and Identity in the Great Indian Desert. Cambridge University Press. p. 103–104. ISBN 978-1-316-67389-8.
- ^ a b c d Kruijtzer, Gijs (2009). Xenophobia in Seventeenth-century India. Leiden University Press. p. 143. ISBN 9789087280680.
- ^ Sen, Surendra Nath (1958). Foreign Biographies of Shivaji (2 ed.). Calcutta: K. P. Bagchi & Company, Indian Council of Historical Research. pp. 265–267.
- ^ a b John Keay (12 April 2011). India: A History. Atlantic. p. 565. ISBN 978-0-8021-9550-0.
- ^ Rao, Anupama (13 October 2009). "Caste Radicalism And The Making Of A New Political Subject". The Caste Question: Dalits and the Politics of Modern India. University of California Press. p. 42. doi:10.1525/9780520943377-006. ISBN 978-0-520-94337-7. S2CID 201912448.
- ^ Krshnaji Ananta Sabhasada; Sen, Surendra Nath (1920). Siva Chhatrapati : being a translation of Sabhasad Bakhar with extracts from Chitnis and Sivadigvijya, with notes. Calcutta : University of Calcutta. pp. 260, 261.
- ^ Truschke, Audrey (2021). "Rajput and Maratha Kingships". The Language of History: Sanskrit Narratives of Indo-Muslim Rule. Columbia University Press. pp. 183–184. ISBN 9780231551953.
- ^ Sardesai, G. S. (1946). "Shahji: The Rising Sun". New History of the Marathas. Vol. 1. Phoenic Publications. p. 46.
- ^ Shivaji, the great Maratha, Volume 2, H. S. Sardesai, Genesis Publishing Pvt Ltd, 2002, ISBN 81-7755-286-4, ISBN 978-81-7755-286-7
- ^ Sumit Sarkar (2000). Issues in Modern Indian History: For Sumit Sarkar. Popular Prakashan. p. 30. ISBN 978-81-7154-658-9.
- ^ a b Stewart Gordon (1993). The Marathas 1600-1818. Cambridge University Press. pp. 120–131. ISBN 978-0-521-26883-7.
- ^ P. V. Kate (1987). Marathwada Under the Nizams, 1724-1948. Mittal Publications. p. 14. ISBN 978-81-7099-017-8.
- ^ S.R. Bakshi; S.R. Sharma; S. Gijrani, eds. (1998). Sharad Pawar: The Maratha Legacy. New Delhi: APH Pub. Corp. p. 28. ISBN 9788176480086.
- ^ Tucker, Spencer C. (23 December 2009). A Global Chronology of Conflict: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East - 6 volumes: From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East. ABC-CLIO. p. 732. ISBN 978-1-85109-672-5.
- ^ Bowman, John (2000). Columbia Chronologies of Asian History and Culture. Columbia University Press. p. 285. ISBN 978-0-231-11004-4.
- ^ An Advanced History of Modern India
- ^ Jaques, Tony (12 November 2017). Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: A-E. Greenwood Publishing Group. ISBN 9780313335372. Retrieved 12 November 2017 – via Google Books.
- ^ A History of the Maratha People Volume 3. Oxford University Press. 1918. pp. 2–10.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - ^ A History of the Maratha People Volume 3. Oxford University Press. 1918. pp. 2–10.
{{cite book}}: Unknown parameter|authors=ignored (help) - ^ Kurup, Ayyappan Madhava (1986). Continuity and Change in a Little Community. Concept Publishing Company.
- ^ a b Society (MANCHESTER), Northern Central British India (1840). Proceedings of a Public Meeting for the formation of The Northern Central British India Society held in the Corn Exchange, Manchester, on Wednesday evening, August 26th, 1840. Northern Central British India Society.
- ^ Hunter, William Wilson (1881). Naaf to Rangmagiri. Trübner.
- ^ Thusu, Kidar Nath (1980). Gond Kingdom of Chanda: With Particular Reference to Its Political Structure. Anthropological Survey of India, Government of India.
- ^ Deogaonkar, Shashishekhar Gopal (2007). The Gonds of Vidarbha. Concept Publishing Company. ISBN 978-81-8069-474-5.
- ^ * Thusu, Kidar Nath (1980). Gond Kingdom of Chanda: With Particular Reference to Its Political Structure. Anthropological Survey of India, Government of India.
- Host Bibliographic Record for Boundwith Item Barcode 30112050248951 and Others. 2013.
- Sil, Jogendra Nath (1917). History of the Central Provinces and Berar. J.N. Sil.
- Pradesh (India), Madhya; Krishnan, V. S. (1995). Madhya Pradesh District Gazetteers: Chhindwara. Government Central Press.
- Bulletin of the Anthropological Survey of India. Director, Anthropological Survey of India, Indian Museum. 1976.
- Bahadur), Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai (1979). Man in India. A. K. Bose.
- Maharashtra State Gazetteers: Bhandara. Director of Government Printing, Stationery and Publications, Maharashtra State. 1979.
- Society (MANCHESTER), Northern Central British India (1840). Proceedings of a Public Meeting for the formation of The Northern Central British India Society held in the Corn Exchange, Manchester, on Wednesday evening, August 26th, 1840. Northern Central British India Society.
- Naik, C. D. (2010). Buddhism and Dalits: Social Philosophy and Traditions. Gyan Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-7835-792-8.
- Kurup, Ayyappan Madhava (1986). Continuity and Change in a Little Community. Concept Publishing Company.
- Hunter, William Wilson (1881). Naaf to Rangmagiri. Trübner.
- Deogaonkar, Shashishekhar Gopal (2007). The Gonds of Vidarbha. Concept Publishing Company. ISBN 978-81-8069-474-5.
- Indian Railways. Railway Board. 1997.
- ^ Kurup, Ayyappan Madhava (1986). Continuity and Change in a Little Community. Concept Publishing Company.
- ^ Jeremy Black (2012). War in the Eighteenth-Century World. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 280. ISBN 9780230370005.
- ^ Saswadkar, P. L. (1965). "Prohibition under the Peshwas in the latter half of the eighteenth century". Proceedings of the Indian History Congress. 27. JSOR: 326–328. JSTOR 44140671. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
- ^ "Brief history of Arcot" (PDF). Tamil Nadu Govt. Retrieved 13 December 2020.
- ^ SNHM. Vol. II, pp. 209, 224.
- ^ Fall Of The Mughal Empire- Volume 1 (4Th Edn.), J.N.Sarka
- ^ Indu Ramchandani, ed. (2000). Student's Britannica: India (Set of 7 Vols.) 39. Popular Prakashan. p. 8. ISBN 978-0-85229-760-5.
