Jump to content

Bird: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Epbr123 (talk | contribs)
ce
Line 192: Line 192:
[[Image:African Scops owl.jpg|thumb|left|The plumage of the [[African Scops Owl]] allows it to blend in with its surroundings.]]
[[Image:African Scops owl.jpg|thumb|left|The plumage of the [[African Scops Owl]] allows it to blend in with its surroundings.]]


Unique to birds, [[feather]]s are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions: they aid in [[thermoregulation]] by insulating from cold weather and water, are essential to [[bird flight|flight]], and are also used in display, camouflage and signaling.<ref name ="Gill"/> There are several types of feather that serve various purposes. Feathers require maintenance and birds preen or groom them daily, spending around 9.2% of each day on this action.<ref>Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps". ''Behavioural Ecology'' '''16''' (1):89–95. {{DOI|10.1093/beheco/arh135}}</ref> The bill is used to brush away foreign particles and to apply [[wax]]y secretions from the [[uropygial gland]] which protect feather flexibility and also acts as an anti-microbial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading [[bacteria]].<ref>Shawkey M, Pillai S, Hill G, (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''34''' (4): 345–49. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x}}</ref> This may be supplemented with the secretions of [[formic acid]] from [[ant]]s, which birds apply in a behaviour known as [[Anting (bird activity)|anting]] to remove feather parasites.<ref>Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''103''' (4): 835.[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v103n04/p0835-p0835.pdf PDF.]</ref>
Unique to birds, [[feather]]s are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions: they aid in [[thermoregulation]] by insulating from cold weather and water, are essential to [[bird flight|flight]], and are also used in display, camouflage and signaling.<ref name ="Gill"/> There are several types of feather, each serving various purposes<!--should it be "a different set of purposes"?-->. Feathers require maintenance and birds preen or groom them daily, spending around 9.2% of each day on this action.<!--It is simply not credible to assert that all species spend around 9.2% of each day doing this: what species were studied in this paper?--><ref>Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps". ''Behavioural Ecology'' '''16''' (1):89–95. {{DOI|10.1093/beheco/arh135}}</ref> The bill is used to brush away foreign particles and to apply [[wax]]y secretions from the [[uropygial gland]] which protect feather flexibility and act as an anti-icrobial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading [[bacteria]].<ref>Shawkey M, Pillai S, Hill G, (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". ''[[Journal of Avian Biology]]'' '''34''' (4): 345–49. {{DOI|10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x}}</ref> This may be supplemented with the secretions of [[formic acid]] from ants, which birds apply <!--they apply the ants or the chemical?-->in a behaviour known as [[Anting (bird activity)|anting]] to remove feather parasites.<ref>Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''103''' (4): 835.[http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v103n04/p0835-p0835.pdf PDF.]</ref>


[[Plumage]] is the term given to the arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body and within species this can vary with age, social status,<ref>Plumage Variation, Plasma Steroids and Social Dominance in Male House Finches
[[Plumage]] is the term given to the arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body; within species this can vary with age, social status,<ref>Plumage Variation, Plasma Steroids and Social Dominance in Male House Finches
James R. Belthoff, Alfred M. Dufty, Jr., Sidney A. Gauthreaux, Jr.
James R. Belthoff, Alfred M. Dufty, Jr., Sidney A. Gauthreaux, Jr.
The Condor, Vol. 96, No. 3 (Aug., 1994), pp. 614–625
The Condor, Vol. 96, No. 3 (Aug., 1994), pp. 614–25
doi:10.2307/1369464</ref> or most commonly [[sexual dimorphism|by sex]].<ref>{{cite web|title=How We Use and Show Our Social Organs|url=http://employees.csbsju.edu/lmealey/hotspots/chapter03.htm|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref> Plumage is regularly [[moult]]ed; the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the non-breeding plumage, or in the [[Humphrey-Parkes terminology]], basic plumage; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as alternate plumages.<ref>Humphrey P, Parkes K (1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumage". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''76''': 1–31. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v076n01/p0001-p0031.pdf PDF].</ref> Moulting is annual in most species but some species may have two moults a year; large birds of prey may moult once in two or three years. Ducks and geese moult their [[flight feather|primaries and secondaries]] simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.<ref name=debeeretal>de Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). [http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/stats/adu/ringmanual.htm SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual.] SAFRING.
doi:10.2307/1369464</ref> or most commonly [[sexual dimorphism|by sex]].<ref>{{cite web|title=How We Use and Show Our Social Organs|url=http://employees.csbsju.edu/lmealey/hotspots/chapter03.htm|accessdate=2007-10-19}}</ref> Plumage is regularly [[moult]]ed; the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the ''non-breeding'' plumage, or in the [[Humphrey-Parkes terminology]], ''basic'' plumage; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as ''alternate'' plumages.<ref>Humphrey P, Parkes K (1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumage". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''76''': 1–31. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v076n01/p0001-p0031.pdf PDF].</ref> Moulting is annual in most species, although some species may have two moults a year, and large birds of prey may moult only once in two or three years. Ducks and geese moult their [[flight feather|primaries and secondaries]] simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.<ref name=debeeretal>de Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). [http://web.uct.ac.za/depts/stats/adu/ringmanual.htm SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual.] SAFRING.
</ref>
</ref>
Moulting patterns vary across species. Some drop and regrow wing flight feathers starting sequentially from the outermost feathers and progressing inwards while others replace feathers starting out from the innermost feathers. The rare few species lose all their flight feathers at once.<ref name=debeeretal/> The first or centripetal moult as termed for the moult of tail feathers is seen in the [[Phasianidae]].<ref>{{cite journal |last= Gargallo|first= Gabriel|year= 1994|month= |title=Flight Feather Moult in the Red-Necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis |journal=Journal of Avian Biology |volume= 25|issue= 2|pages= 119–124|accessdate= 2007-10-20 }}</ref> The second or centrifugal moult is seen for instance in the tail feathers of the [[woodpecker]]s and [[treecreeper]]s, although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and finishes with the central pair of feathers so that the bird is constantly permitted to have a functional climbing tail.<ref>Mayr E, Mayr M (1954). "The tail molt of small owls". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''71''' (2): 172–78. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v071n02/p0172-p0178.pdf PDF]</ref> The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward.<ref>{{cite web|title=Birds of the World, Biology 532|url=http://www.ummz.umich.edu/birds/resources/families_otw.html|accessdate=2007-10-20}}</ref>
Moulting patterns vary across species. Some drop and regrow wing flight feathers, starting sequentially from the outermost feathers and progressing inwards, while others replace feathers starting out from the innermost feathers. A small number of species lose all of their flight feathers at once.<ref name=debeeretal/> The first or centripetal moult, as termed for the moult of tail feathers, is seen in the [[Phasianidae]].<ref>{{cite journal |last= Gargallo|first= Gabriel|year= 1994|month= |title=Flight Feather Moult in the Red-Necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis |journal=Journal of Avian Biology |volume= 25|issue= 2|pages= 119–124|accessdate= 2007-10-20 }}</ref> The second or centrifugal moult is seen, for instance, in the tail feathers of [[woodpecker]]s and [[treecreeper]]s, although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and finishes with the central pair of feathers so that the bird maintains a functional climbing tail.<ref>Mayr E, Mayr M (1954). "The tail molt of small owls". ''[[The Auk]]'' '''71''' (2): 172–78. [http://elibrary.unm.edu/sora/Auk/v071n02/p0172-p0178.pdf PDF]</ref> The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward.<ref>{{cite web|title=Birds of the World, Biology 532|url=http://www.ummz.umich.edu/birds/resources/families_otw.html|accessdate=2007-10-20}}</ref>


Feathers do not arise from all parts of the bird's skin but grow in specific tracts or pterylae. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or pterylosis is used in taxonomy and systematics. Prior to nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare [[brood patch]] by loss of feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps the bird in incubation.<ref>Turner JS (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch". ''Physiological Zoology'' '''70''' (4): 470–80. PMID 9237308</ref>
Feathers do not arise from all parts of a bird's skin, but grow in specific tracts or pterylae. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or pterylosis is used in taxonomy and systematics. Before nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare [[brood patch]] by losing feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps the bird in incubation.<ref>Turner JS (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch". ''Physiological Zoology'' '''70''' (4): 470–80. PMID 9237308</ref>


===Flight===
===Flight===

Revision as of 00:05, 10 December 2007

Birds
Temporal range: 160 Ma
Late Jurassic – Recent
Superb Fairy-wren, Malurus cyaneus, juvenile
Scientific classification
Kingdom:
Phylum:
Subphylum:
(unranked):
Class:
Aves

Linnaeus, 1758
Orders

About two dozen - see section below

Birds (class Aves) are bipedal, warm-blooded, vertebrate animals that lay eggs. There are around 10,000 living species, making them the most diverse tetrapod vertebrates. They inhabit ecosystems across the globe, from the Arctic to the Antarctic. Birds range in size from the 5 cm (2 in) Bee Hummingbird to the 2.7 m (9 ft) Ostrich. The fossil record indicates that birds evolved from theropod dinosaurs during the Jurassic period, around 150–200 Ma (million years ago), and the earliest known bird is the Late Jurassic Archaeopteryx, c 155–150 Ma.

Modern birds are characterised by feathers, a beak with no teeth, the laying of hard-shelled eggs, a high metabolic rate, a four-chambered heart, and a lightweight but strong skeleton. All birds have forelimbs modified as wings and most can fly, with the exceptions including ratites, penguins, and a number of diverse endemic island species. Birds also have unique digestive and respiratory systems that are highly adapted for flight.

Many species undertake long distance annual migrations and many more perform shorter irregular movements. Birds are social and communicate using visual signals and through calls and song and participate in social behaviours, including cooperative hunting, cooperative breeding, flocking, and mobbing of predators. The vast majority of bird species are socially monogamous, usually for one breeding season at a time, sometimes for years, but rarely for life. Other species have breeding systems that are polygynous ("many females") or, rarely, polyandrous ("many males"). Eggs are usually laid in a nest and incubated by the parents. Most birds have an extended period of parental care after hatching.

Many species are of economic importance, mostly as sources of food that are acquired either through hunting or farming. Some species, particularly songbirds and parrots, are popular as pets. Other uses include the harvesting of guano (droppings) for use as a fertiliser. Birds figure prominently in all aspects of human culture from religion to poetry to popular music. About 120–130 species have become extinct as a result of human activity since 1600, and hundreds more before then. Currently around 1,200 species of birds are threatened with extinction by human activities, though efforts are underway to protect them.

Evolution and taxonomy

Archaeopteryx, the earliest known bird

The first classification of birds was developed by Francis Willughby and John Ray in their 1676 volume, Ornithologiae.[1] Carolus Linnaeus modified that work in 1758 to devise the taxonomic classification system currently in use.[2] Birds are categorised as the biological class Aves in Linnaean taxonomy. Phylogenetic taxonomy places Aves in the dinosaur clade Theropoda.[3] Aves and a sister group, the clade Crocodilia, together are the sole living members of the reptile clade Archosauria. Phylogenetically, Aves is commonly defined as all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of modern birds and Archaeopteryx lithographica.[4] Archaeopteryx, from the Kimmeridgian stage of the Late Jurassic (some 155–150 million years ago), is the earliest known bird under this definition. Others, including Gauthier and adherents of the Phylocode system, have defined Aves to include only the modern bird groups, excluding most groups known only from fossils, and assigning them, instead, to the Avialae[5] in part to avoid the uncertainties about the placement of Archaeopteryx in relation to animals traditionally thought of as theropod dinosaurs.

All modern birds lie within the subclass Neornithes, which is divided into two superorders, the Paleognathae (mostly flightless birds like ostriches), and the wildly diverse Neognathae, containing all other birds.[3] Depending on the taxonomic viewpoint, the number of known living bird species varies anywhere from 9,800[6] to 10,050.[7]

Dinosaurs and the origin of birds

File:Confuciusornis.jpg
Confuciusornis, a Cretaceous bird from China

There is substantial evidence that birds are theropod dinosaurs; more specifically that they are members of Maniraptora, a group of theropods which includes dromaeosaurs and oviraptorids among others.[8] As more non-avian theropods that are closely related to birds are discovered, the previously clear distinction between non-birds and birds becomes blurred. Recent discoveries in Liaoning Province of northeast China, which demonstrate that many small theropod dinosaurs had feathers, contribute to this ambiguity.[9]

The oldest known bird, the Late Jurassic Archaeopteryx, is well-known as one of the first transitional fossils to be found in support of evolution in the late 19th century, though it is not considered a direct ancestor of modern birds. Protoavis texensis may be even older, although the fragmentary nature of this fossil leaves it open to considerable doubt whether this was a bird ancestor.[10]

The dromaeosaurids Cryptovolans and Microraptor may have been capable of powered flight to a similar or greater extent than that of Archaeopteryx. Cryptovolans had a sternal keel and had ribs with uncinate processes, and in fact makes a better "bird" than Archaeopteryx, which lacks some of these modern bird features. Because of this, some paleontologists have suggested that dromaeosaurs are actually basal birds and that the larger members of the family are secondarily flightless. This theory means that dromaeosaurs evolved from birds and not the other way around.[11] Evidence for this theory is currently inconclusive, as the exact relationship among the most advanced maniraptoran dinosaurs and the most primitive true birds is not well understood.

Although ornithischian (bird-hipped) dinosaurs share the hip structure of birds, birds actually originated from the saurischian (lizard-hipped) dinosaurs, and therefore evolved their hip structure independently.[12] In fact, the bird-like hip structure also developed a third time among a peculiar group of theropods, the Therizinosauridae.

An alternate theory to the dinosaurian origin of birds, proposed by a few scientists (most notably Larry Martin and Alan Feduccia), states that birds (including maniraptoran "dinosaurs") evolved from early archosaurs like Longisquama,[13] a theory which is contested by most paleontologists and evidence based on feather development and evolution.[14]

Early evolution of birds

Birds diversified into a wide variety of forms during the Cretaceous Period.[15] Many groups retained primitive characteristics, such as clawed wings and teeth, though the latter were lost independently in a number of bird groups, including modern birds (Neornithes). While the earliest forms, such as such as Archaeopteryx and Jeholornis, retained the long bony tails of their ancestors,[15] more advanced birds shortened their tail with the advent of the pygostyle bone in the clade Pygostylia.

The first large, diverse lineage of short-tailed birds to evolve were the Enantiornithes, or "opposite birds", so named because the construction of their shoulder bones was the reverse of the condition seen in modern birds. Enantiornithes occupied a wide array of ecological niches, from sand-probing shorebirds and fish-eaters to tree-dwelling forms and seed-eaters.[15] More advanced lineages also specialized in eating fish, like the superficially gull-like subclass of Ichthyornithes ("fish birds").[16] One order of Mesozoic seabirds, the Hesperornithiformes, became so well adapted to hunting fish in marine environments that they lost the ability to fly and became primarily aquatic. Despite their extreme specializations, the Hesperornithiformes represent some of the closest relatives of modern birds.[15]

Radiation of modern birds

Containing all modern birds, the subclass Neornithes is, due to the discovery of Vegavis, now known to have evolved into some basic lineages by the end of the Cretaceous[17] and is split into two superorders, the Paleognathae and Neognathae. The paleognaths include the tinamous of Central and South America and the ratites. The basal divergence from the remaining Neognathes was that the Galloanserae, the superorder containing the Anseriformes (ducks, geese, swans and screamers) and the Galliformes (the pheasants, grouse, and their allies, together with the mound builders and the guans and their allies). The dates for the splits are much debated by scientists. It is agreed that the Neornithes evolved in the Cretaceous and that the split between the Galloanseri from other Neognathes occurred before the K–T extinction event, but there are different opinions about whether the radiation of the remaining Neognathes occurred before or after the extinction of the other dinosaurs.[18] This disagreement is in part caused by a divergence in the evidence; molecular dating suggests a Cretaceous radiation, while fossil evidence supports a Tertiary radiation. Attempts to reconcile the molecular and fossil evidence have proved controversial.[18][19]

The classification of birds is a contentious issue. Sibley and Ahlquist's Phylogeny and Classification of Birds (1990) is a landmark work on the classification of birds,[20] although it is frequently debated and constantly revised. Most evidence seems to suggest that the modern bird orders constitute accurate taxa,[21] although scientists disagree about the relationships between the orders themselves; evidence from modern bird anatomy, fossils and DNA have all been brought to bear on the problem, but no strong consensus has emerged. More recently, new fossil and molecular evidence is providing an increasingly clear picture of the evolution of modern bird orders.

Modern bird orders

This is a list of the taxonomic orders in the subclass Neornithes, or modern birds. This is the traditional classification (the so-called Clements order), revised by the Sibley-Monroe classification. The list of birds gives a more detailed summary of the orders, including families.

Subclass Neornithes
Paleognathae:

Neognathae:

The radically different Sibley-Monroe classification (Sibley-Ahlquist taxonomy) based on molecular data became quite influential as recent molecular, fossil and anatomical evidence supported the Galloanserae.[18] By 2006, increasing evidence made it possible to verify the major proposals of the taxonomy, such as in Charadriiformes, Gruiformes or Caprimulgiformes.

Distribution

The range of the House Sparrow has expanded dramatically due to human activities.[22]

Birds breed on all seven continents, with the highest diversity occurring in tropical regions. This may be due either to higher speciation rates in the tropics or to higher extinction rates at higher latitudes.[23] They are able to live and feed in most of the world's terrestrial habitats, reaching their southern extreme in the Snow Petrel's breeding colonies, which are found as far as 440 kilometres (270 mi) inland in Antarctica.[24] Several families of birds have adapted to life both on the world's oceans and in them, with some seabird species coming ashore only to breed[25] and some penguins recorded diving as deeply as 300 metres (980 ft).[26] Many species have established naturalised breeding populations in areas to which they have been introduced by humans. Some of these introductions have been deliberate; the Ring-necked Pheasant, for example, has been introduced around the world as a game bird.[27] Others are accidental, such as the Monk Parakeets that have escaped from captivity and established breeding colonies in a number of North American cities.[28] Some species, including the Cattle Egret,[29] Yellow-headed Caracara[30] and Galah,[31] have spread naturally far beyond their original ranges as agricultural practices created suitable new habitat.

Anatomy

External anatomy of a bird: 1 Beak, 2 Head, 3 Iris, 4 Pupil, 5 Mantle, 6 Lesser coverts, 7 Scapulars, 8 Median coverts, 9 Tertials, 10 Rump, 11 Primaries, 12 Vent, 13 Thigh, 14 Tibio-tarsal articulation, 15 Tarsus, 16 Feet, 17 Tibia, 18 Belly, 19 Flanks, 20 Breast, 21 Throat, 22 Wattle

Compared with other vertebrates, birds have a body plan that shows many unusual adaptations, mostly to facilitate flight.

The skeleton consists of very lightweight bones. They have large pneumatic (air-filled) cavities which connect with the respiratory system.[32] The skull bones are fused and do not show cranial sutures.[33] The orbits are large and separated by a bony septum. The spine has cervical, thoracic, lumbar and caudal regions with the number of cervical (neck) vertebrae highly variable and especially flexible, but movement is reduced in the anterior thoracic vertebrae and absent in the later vertebrae.[34] The last few are fused with the pelvis to form the synsacrum.[33] The ribs are flattened and the sternum is keeled for the attachment of flight muscles except in the flightless bird orders. The forelimbs are modified into the wings.[35]

Like the reptiles, birds are primarily uricotelic, which means that their kidneys extract nitrogenous wastes from their bloodstream and excrete it as uric acid instead of urea or ammonia. The uric acid is excreted along with feces as a semisolid waste since birds do not have a separate urinary bladder or opening.[36][37] However, birds such as hummingbirds can be facultatively ammonotelic, excreting most of the nitrogenous wastes as ammonia.[38] They also excrete creatine rather than creatinine as in mammals.[33] This material, as well as the output of the intestines, emerges from the bird's cloaca.[39][40] The cloaca is a multi-purpose opening: their wastes are expelled through it, they mate by joining cloaca, and females lay eggs from it. In addition, many species of birds regurgitate pellets.[41] The digestive system of the bird is unique, with a crop for storage and a gizzard that contains swallowed stones for grinding food to compensate for the lack of teeth.[42] Most are highly adapted for rapid digestion to aid in the bird's flight.[43] Some migratory birds have the additional ability to reduce parts of the intestines prior to migration.[44]

Birds have one of the most complex respiratory systems of all animal groups.[33] Upon inhalation, 75% of the fresh air bypasses the lungs and flows directly into a posterior air sac which extends from the lungs and connects with air spaces in the bones and fills them with air. The other 25% of the air goes directly into the lungs. When the bird exhales, the used air flows out of the lung and the stored fresh air from the posterior air sac is simultaneously forced into the lungs. Thus, a bird's lungs receive a constant supply of fresh air during both inhalation and exhalation.[45] Sound production is achieved using the syrinx, a muscular chamber with several tympanic membranes which is situated at the lower end of the trachea where it bifurcates.[46] The bird's heart has four chambers and the right aortic arch gives rise to systemic aorta (unlike in the mammals where the left arch is involved).[33] The postcava receives blood from the limbs via the renal portal system. Unlike mammals, the red blood cells in birds retain a nucleus.[47]

The nervous system is large relative to the bird's size.[33] The most developed part of the brain is the one that controls the flight related function, while the cerebellum coordinates movement and the cerebrum controls behaviour patterns, navigation, mating and nest building. Most birds have a poor sense of smell with notable exceptions including kiwis,[48] New World vultures[49] and the tubenoses.[50] The visual system is usually highly developed. Water birds have special flexible lenses, allowing accommodation for vision in air and water.[33] Some species also have dual fovea. Birds are tetrachromatic, possessing ultraviolet (UV) sensitive cone cells in the eye as well as green, red and blue ones.[51] This allows them to perceive ultraviolet light, which is used in courtship. Many birds show plumage patterns in ultraviolet that are invisible to the human eye; some birds whose sexes appear similar to the naked eye are distinguished by the presence of ultraviolet reflective patches on their feathers. Male Blue Tits have an ultraviolet reflective crown patch which is displayed in courtship by posturing and raising of their nape feathers.[52] Ultraviolet light is also used in foraging—kestrels have been shown to search for prey by detecting the UV reflective urine trail marks left on the ground by rodents.[53] The eyelids of a bird are not used in blinking. Instead the eye is lubricated by the nictitating membrane, which is a third eyelid that moves horizontally.[54] The nictitating membrane also covers the eye and acts as a contact lens in many aquatic birds.[33] The bird retina has a fan shaped blood supply system called the pecten.[33] Most birds cannot move their eyes, although there are exceptions, such as the Great Cormorant.[55] Birds with eyes on the sides of their heads have a wide visual field, while birds with eyes on the front of their heads, such as owls, have binocular vision and can estimate the depth of field.[56] The avian ear lacks external pinnae but is covered by feathers, although in some birds, such as the Asio, Bubo and Otus owls, these feathers form tufts which resemble ears. The inner ear has a cochlea, but it is not spiral as in mammals.[57]

A few species are able to use chemical defenses against predators; some Procellariiformes can eject an unpleasant oil against an aggressor,[58] and some species of pitohui from New Guinea secrete a powerful neurotoxin in their skin and feathers.[59]

Feathers and plumage

The plumage of the African Scops Owl allows it to blend in with its surroundings.

Unique to birds, feathers are epidermal growths attached to the skin that serve a variety of functions: they aid in thermoregulation by insulating from cold weather and water, are essential to flight, and are also used in display, camouflage and signaling.[33] There are several types of feather, each serving various purposes. Feathers require maintenance and birds preen or groom them daily, spending around 9.2% of each day on this action.[60] The bill is used to brush away foreign particles and to apply waxy secretions from the uropygial gland which protect feather flexibility and act as an anti-icrobial agent, inhibiting the growth of feather-degrading bacteria.[61] This may be supplemented with the secretions of formic acid from ants, which birds apply in a behaviour known as anting to remove feather parasites.[62]

Plumage is the term given to the arrangement and appearance of feathers on the body; within species this can vary with age, social status,[63] or most commonly by sex.[64] Plumage is regularly moulted; the standard plumage of a bird that has moulted after breeding is known as the non-breeding plumage, or in the Humphrey-Parkes terminology, basic plumage; breeding plumages or variations of the basic plumage are known under the Humphrey-Parkes system as alternate plumages.[65] Moulting is annual in most species, although some species may have two moults a year, and large birds of prey may moult only once in two or three years. Ducks and geese moult their primaries and secondaries simultaneously and become flightless for about a month.[66] Moulting patterns vary across species. Some drop and regrow wing flight feathers, starting sequentially from the outermost feathers and progressing inwards, while others replace feathers starting out from the innermost feathers. A small number of species lose all of their flight feathers at once.[66] The first or centripetal moult, as termed for the moult of tail feathers, is seen in the Phasianidae.[67] The second or centrifugal moult is seen, for instance, in the tail feathers of woodpeckers and treecreepers, although it begins with the second innermost pair of tail-feathers and finishes with the central pair of feathers so that the bird maintains a functional climbing tail.[68] The general pattern seen in the passerines is that the primaries are replaced outward, secondaries inward, and the tail from center outward.[69]

Feathers do not arise from all parts of a bird's skin, but grow in specific tracts or pterylae. The distribution pattern of these feather tracts or pterylosis is used in taxonomy and systematics. Before nesting, the females of most bird species gain a bare brood patch by losing feathers close to the belly. The skin here is well supplied with blood vessels and helps the bird in incubation.[70]

Flight

Common Raven in flight

Flight characterises most birds, distinguishing them from almost all other vertebrates with the exception of mammalian bats and the extinct pterosaurs. As the main means of locomotion for most bird species, flight is used for breeding, feeding, and predator avoidance and escape. Birds have a variety of adaptations to flight, including a lightweight skeleton, two large flight muscles, the pectoralis (which accounts for 15% of the total mass of the bird) and the supercoracoideus and a modified forelimb (the wing) serving as an aerofoil.[33] Wing shape and size primarily determines the type of flight each species is capable of. Many birds combine powered or flapping flight with less energy intensive soaring flight. About 60 species of extant birds are flightless, and many extinct birds were also flightless.[71] Flightlessness often arises in birds on isolated islands, probably due to the lack of land predators and limited resources, which are conditions that reward the loss of costly unnecessary adaptations.[72] Though flightless, penguins use similar musculature and movements to "fly" through the water, as do auks, shearwaters and dippers.[73]

Behaviour

Most birds are diurnal, but some birds, such as many species of owls and nightjars, are nocturnal or crepuscular (active during twilight hours), and many coastal waders feed when the tides are appropriate, by day or night.[74]

Diet and feeding

Feeding adaptations in beaks

Birds feed on a variety of things, including nectar, fruit, plants, seeds, carrion, and various small animals, including other birds.[33] Because birds have no teeth, the digestive system of birds is specially adapted to process unmasticated food items that are usually swallowed whole.

Different species of birds use different feeding strategies. Many glean for insects, invertebrates, fruit or seeds. Some hunt insects by sallying from a branch. Nectar feeders such as hummingbirds, sunbirds, lories and lorikeets amongst others are facilitated by specially adapted brushy tongues and in many cases bills designed to fit co-adapted flowers.[75] Kiwis and shorebirds with long bills probe for invertebrates; in the case of shorebirds, length of bill and feeding method are associated with niche separation.[33][76] Loons, diving ducks, penguins and auks pursue their prey underwater, using their wings or feet for propulsion,[25] while aerial predators such as sulids, kingfishers and terns plunge dive after their prey. Three species of prion, the flamingos and some ducks are filter feeders.[77][78] Geese and dabbling ducks are primarily grazers. Some species will engage in kleptoparasitism, stealing food items from other birds; frigatebirds, gulls,[79] and skuas[80] employ this type of feeding behaviour. Kleptoparasitism is not thought to play a significant part of the diet of any species, and is instead a supplement to food obtained by hunting; a study of Great Frigatebirds stealing from Masked Boobies estimated that the frigatebirds could at most obtain 40% of the food they needed and on average obtained only 5%.[81] Some birds are scavengers, either specialised carrion eaters like vultures or opportunists like gulls, corvids or other birds of prey.[82] Some birds may employ many strategies to obtain food or feed on a variety of food items and are called generalists, while others are considered specialists, concentrating time and effort on specific food items or having a single strategy to obtain food.[33]

The routes of satellite tagged Bar-tailed Godwits migrating north from New Zealand. This species has the longest known non-stop migration of any species, up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).

Migration

Many bird species migrate to take advantage of global differences of seasonal temperatures, therefore optimising availability of food sources and breeding habitat. These migrations vary among the different groups. Many landbirds, shorebirds, and waterbirds undertake annual long distance migrations, usually triggered by the length of daylight as well as weather conditions. These birds are characterised by a breeding season spent in the temperate or arctic/antarctic regions and a non-breeding season in the tropical regions or opposite hemisphere. Before migration, birds substantially increase body fats and reserves and reduce the size of some of their organs.[83][44] Migration is highly demanding energetically, particularly as birds need to cross deserts and oceans without refueling. Landbirds have a flight range of around 2,500 km (1,600 mi) and shorebirds can fly up to 4,000 km (2,500 mi),[33] although the Bar-tailed Godwit is capable of non-stop flights of up to 10,200 km (6,300 mi).[84] Seabirds also undertake long migrations, the longest annual migration being those of Sooty Shearwaters, which nest in New Zealand and Chile and spend the northern summer feeding in the North Pacific off Japan, Alaska and California, an annual round trip of 64,000 km (39,800 mi).[85] Other seabirds disperse after breeding, traveling widely but having no set migration route. Albatrosses nesting in the Southern Ocean often undertake circumpolar trips between breeding seasons.[86]

Some bird species undertake shorter migrations, traveling only as far as is required to avoid bad weather or obtain food. Irruptive species such as the boreal finches are one such group and can commonly found at a location in one year while absent in others. This type of migration is normally associated with food availability.[87] Species may also travel shorter distances over part of their range, with individuals from higher latitudes travelling into the existing range of conspecifics; others undertake partial migrations, where only a fraction of the population, usually females and subdominant males, migrates.[88] Partial migration can form a large percentage of the migration behaviour of birds in some regions; in Australia, surveys found that 44% of non-passerine birds and 32% of passerines were partially migratory.[89] Altitudinal migration is a form of short distance migration in which birds spend the breeding season at higher altitudes elevations and move to lower ones during suboptimal conditions. It is most often triggered by temperature changes and usually occurs when the normal territories also become inhospitable due to lack of food.[90] Some species may also be nomadic, holding no fixed territory and moving according to weather and food availability. Parrots as a family are overwhelmingly neither migratory nor sedentary but considered to either be dispersive, irruptive, nomadic or undertake small and irregular migrations.[91]

The ability of birds to return to precise locations across vast distances has been known for some time; in an experiment conducted in the 1950s a Manx Shearwater released in Boston returned to its colony in Skomer, Wales within 13 days, a distance of 5,150 km (3,200 mi).[92] Birds navigate during migration using a variety of methods. For diurnal migrants, the sun is used to navigate by day, and a stellar compass is used at night. Birds that use the sun compensate for the changing position of the sun during the day by the use of an internal clock.[33] Orientation with the stellar compass depends on the position of the constellations surrounding Polaris.[93] These are backed up in some species by their ability to sense the Earth's geomagnetism through specialised photoreceptors.[94]

Communication

Birds communicate principally using visual and auditory signals. Signals can be interspecific (between species) and intraspecific (within species).

The startling display of the Sunbittern mimics a large predator

Visual communication in birds serves a number of functions and is manifested in both plumage and behaviour.[43] Plumage can be used to assess and assert social dominance,[95] display breeding condition in sexually selected species, or even make a threatening display, such as the threat display of the Sunbittern, which mimics a large possible predator and is used to ward off potential predators such as hawks and to protect young chicks.[96] Variation in plumage also allows for the identification of birds, particularly between species.

Ritualised displays comprise those which signal aggression or submission, as well those used in the formation of pair-bonds.[33] These have developed from non-signaling actions such as preening, the adjustments of feather position, pecking, or other behaviour; they are used as forms of visual communication as indication of a particular trait or mood. The most elaborate displays are shown during courtship, such as the breeding dances of the albatrosses, where the successful formation of a life-long pair-bond requires both partners to practice a unique dance,[97] and the birds-of-paradise, where the breeding success of males depends on plumage and display quality.[98] Male birds can demonstrate their fitness through nest-site selection and construction; females of weaver species, such as the Baya Weaver, may choose mates with good site selection and nest-building skills,[99] while bowerbirds attract mates through constructing bowers and decorating them with bright objects.[100]

In addition to visual communication, birds are renowned for their auditory skills. Calls, and in some species song, are the major means by which birds communicate with sound, although some birds use mechanical sounds such as driving air through their feathers like the Coenocorypha snipes of New Zealand,[101] the territorial drumming of woodpeckers,[43] or the use of tools to drum in Palm Cockatoos.[102] Bird calls and songs can be very complex; sounds are created in the syrinx, both sides of which, in some species, can be operated separately, resulting in two different songs being produced at the same time.[46]

Call of the House Wren, a common songbird from North America

Calls are used for a variety of purposes, several of which may be tied into an individual song.[103] They are used to advertise when seeking a mate by either attracting a mate, aiding in the identification of potential mates, or aiding in bond formation and are often combined with visual communication. They can convey information about the quality of a male and aid in the female's choice.[104] They are used to claim and maintain territories. Calls can also be used to identify individuals, aiding parents in finding chicks in crowded colonies or adults reuniting with mates at the start of the breeding season.[105] Calls may be used to warn other birds of potential predators; calls of this nature may be detailed and convey specific information about the nature of the threat.[106]

Red-billed Queleas, the most numerous species of bird,[107] form enormous flocks—sometimes tens of thousands strong.

Flocking

While some birds are essentially territorial or live in small family groups, other birds may form large flocks. The benefits of aggregating in flocks are varied and flocks will form explicitly for specific purposes. Flocking also has costs, particularly to socially subordinate birds, which are bullied by more dominant birds; birds may also sacrifice feeding efficiency in a flock to gain other benefits.[108] The principal benefits are safety in numbers and increased foraging efficiency.[33] Defence against predators is particularly important in closed habitats such as forests where predation is often by ambush and the early warning provided by multiple eyes is important. This has led to the development of many mixed-species feeding flocks.[109] These multi-species flocks are usually composed of small numbers of many species, which increases the benefits of numbers but reduces potential competition for resources. Birds also form associations with non-avian species; plunge-diving seabirds associate with dolphins and tuna, which push shoaling fish up towards the surface,[110] while a mutualistic relationship has evolved between Dwarf Mongooses and hornbills, where hornbills seek out mongooses to forage together and warn each other of nearby birds of prey and other predators.[111]

Resting and roosting

The high metabolic rates of birds during the active part of the day is supplemented by rest at other times. Sleeping birds often utilise a type of sleep known as vigilant sleep, where periods of rest are interspersed with quick eye-opening 'peeks', thus allowing birds to be sensitive to disturbances and enable rapid escape from threats.[112] Swifts have been widely believed to be able to sleep while flying; however, this has not been confirmed by experimental evidence. However, there may be certain kinds of sleep which are possible even when in flight.[113] Some birds have also demonstrated the capacity to fall into slow-wave sleep one hemisphere of the brain at a time. The birds tend to exercise this ability depending upon its position relative to the outside of the flock. This may allow the eye opposite the sleeping hemisphere to remain vigilant for predators by viewing the outer margins of the flock. This adaption is also known in marine mammals.[114]

Many sleeping birds bend their heads over their backs and tuck their bills in their back feathers, although others place their beaks among their breast feathers. Many birds rest on one leg, while some may pull up their legs into their feathers, especially in cold weather. Communal roosting is common because it lowers the loss of body heat and decreases the risks associated with predators.[115] Roosting sites are often chosen with regard to thermoregulation and safety.[116] Perching birds have a tendon locking mechanism that helps them hold on to the perch when they are asleep. Many ground birds, such as quails and pheasants, roost in trees. A few parrots of the genus Loriculus roost hanging upside down.[117] Some hummingbirds go into a nightly state of torpor with a reduction in their metabolic rates.[118] This physiological adaptation is shown in around a hundred other species, including owlet-nightjars, nightjars, and woodswallows. One species, the Common Poorwill, even enters a state of hibernation.[119] Birds do not have sweat glands, but they may cool themselves by moving to shade, standing in water, panting, increasing their surface area, fluttering their throat or by using special behaviours like urohidrosis to cool themselves.

Breeding

Social systems

Red-necked Phalaropes have an unusual polyandrous mating system where males care for the eggs and chicks and brightly coloured females compete for males.[120]

Birds, like mammals, have two sexes, male and female. Hermaphroditism is unknown and unlike several other animal groups an individual's sex is determined at fertilization. The sex chromosomes of birds differ to those of mammals, W and Z instead of X and Y, and in birds the females have two different sex chromosomes, WZ, as opposed to the males, which have two Z chromosomes, ZZ (in contrast to mammals where two different sex chromosomes makes an individual male).[33]

The vast majority (95%) of bird species are socially monogamous; although polygyny (2%) and polyandry (< 1%), polygamy, polygynandry (where a female pairs with several males and the male pairs with several females) and promiscuity systems also occur.[33] Some species may use more than one system depending on the circumstances. Monogamous species of males and females pair for the breeding season; in some cases, the pair bonds may persist for a number of years or even the lifetime of the pair.[121]

The advantage of monogamy for birds is bi-parental care. In most groups of animals, male parental care is rare, but in birds it is quite common; in fact, it is more extensive in birds than in any other vertebrate class.[33] In birds, male care can be seen as important or essential to female fitness; in some species the females are unable to successfully raise a brood without the help of the male.[122] Polygamous breeding systems arise when females are able to raise broods without the help of males.[33] There is sometimes a division of labour in monogamous species, with the roles of incubation, nest site defence, chick feeding and territory defence being either shared or undertaken by one sex.[123]

While social monogamy is common in birds, infidelity, in the form of extra-pair copulations, is common in many socially monogamous species.[124] These can take the form of forced copulation or rape in ducks and other anatids[125] or more usually between dominant males and females partnered with subordinate males. The benefit to females is thought to come from getting better genes for her offspring, as well as an insurance against the possibility of infertility in her mate.[126] Males in species that engages in extra-pair copulations will engage in mate-guarding to ensure parentage of the offspring they raise.[127]

Breeding usually involves some form of courtship display, most often performed by the male.[128] Most are rather simple and usually involve some type of song. Some displays can be quite elaborate, using such varied methods as tail and wing drumming, dancing, aerial flights, or communal leks depending on the species. Females are most often involved with partner selection,[129] although in the polyandrous phalaropes the males choose brightly coloured females.[130] Courtship feeding, billing and preening is commonly performed between partners, most often after birds have been paired and mated.[43]

Territories, nesting and incubation

Many birds actively defend a territory from others of the same species during the breeding season. Large territories are protected in order to protect the food source for their chicks. Species that are unable to defend feeding territories, such as seabirds and swifts, often breed in colonies instead; this is thought to offer protection from predators. Colonial breeders will defend small nesting sites and competition between and within species for nesting sites can be intense.[131]

The nesting colonies of the Sociable Weaver are amongst the largest bird-created structures.

All birds lay amniotic eggs with hard shells made mostly of calcium carbonate.[33] The colour of eggs is controlled by a number of factors; those of hole and burrow nesting species tend to be white or pale, while those of open nesters, such as those in the order Charadriiformes, are camouflaged. There are many exceptions to this pattern, however; the ground nesting nightjars have pale eggs with camouflage being provided instead by the bird's plumage. Species that are victims of brood parasites like the Dideric Cuckoo will vary their egg colours in order to improve the chances of spotting a cuckoo's egg, thus forcing female cuckoos to match their eggs to that of their hosts.[132]

The eggs are usually laid in a nest, which can be highly elaborate, like those created by weavers and oropendolas, or extremely primitive, like some albatross nests, which are no more than a scrape on the ground. Some species have no nest; the cliff nesting Common Guillemot lays its egg on bare rock and the egg of the Emperor Penguin is kept between the body and feet of the male. This is especially prevalent in ground nesting species where the newly hatched young are precocial. Most species build more elaborate nests, which can be cups, domes, plates, beds scrapes, mounds or burrows.[133] Most nests are built in shelter and are hidden to reduce the risk of predation, while more open nests are usually colonial or built by larger birds capable of defending the nest. Nests are mostly built out of plant matter. Some species specifically select plants such as yarrow, which have toxins that reduce nest parasites such as mites and therefore lead to increased chick survival.[134] Nests are often lined with feathers in order to improve the retention of heat.[133]

Incubation usually begins after the last egg has been laid and serves to optimise temperature for chick development.[33] Duties are often shared in monogamous species; in polygamous species a single parent undertakes all incubating. Warmth from parents passes to the eggs through brood patches, areas of bare skin on the abdomen or breast of the incubating birds. Incubation can be an energetically demanding process; for example, adult albatrosses lose as much as 83 g (3 oz) of body weight a day.[135] The warmth for the incubation of the eggs of megapodes comes from the sun, decaying vegetation or volcanic sources.[136] Incubation periods last between 10 days (in species of woodpeckers, cuckoos and passerine birds) to over 80 days (in albatrosses and kiwis).[33]

A female Seychelles Sunbird with arachnid prey attending its nest.

Parental care and fledging

Chicks can be anywhere from helpless to independent at hatching. The helpless chicks are known as altricial and tend to be born, small, naked and blind; chicks that are mobile and feathered at hatching are precocial. Chicks at neither of the extremes can be semi-precocial or semi-altricial. Altricial chicks require help in thermoregulation and need to be brooded for longer than precocial chicks.

The length and nature of parental care varies widely amongst different orders and species. At one extreme, parental care in megapodes ends at hatching; the newly-hatched chick digs itself out of the nest mound without parental assistance and can fend for itself immediately.[137] At the other extreme, many seabirds have extended periods of parental care, the longest being that of the Great Frigatebird, whose chicks take up to six months to fledge and are fed by the parents for up to an additional 14 months.[138]

In some species the care of young is shared between both parents; in others it is the responsibility of just one sex. In some species other members of the same species will help the breeding pair in raising the young. These helpers are usually close relatives, such as the chicks of the breeding pair from previous breeding seasons.[139] Alloparenting is particularly common among the Corvida, which includes such birds as the true crows, Australian Magpie and Fairy-wrens,[140] but has been observed in as different species as the Rifleman and Red Kite.

This Reed Warbler is raising the young of a Common Cuckoo, a brood parasite

The point at which chicks fledge varies dramatically. The chicks of the Synthliboramphus murrelets, like the Ancient Murrelet, leave the nest the night after they hatch, following their parents' calls out to sea, where they are raised away from terrestrial predators.[141] Some other species, such as ducks, move their chicks away from the nest at an early age. In most species chicks leave the nest soon after, or just before, they are able to fly. Parental care after fledging varies; in albatrosses chicks leave the nest alone and receive no further help, while other species continue some supplementary feeding after fledging.[142] Chicks may also follow their parents during their first migration.[143]

Brood parasites

Although some insects and fish engage in brood parasitism, most brood parasites are birds.[144] Brood parasites are birds which lay their eggs in the nests of other birds. These eggs are often accepted and raised by the host species, often at the cost of their own brood. There are two kinds of brood parasite, obligate brood parasites, which are incapable of raising their own young and must lay their eggs in the nests of other species; and non-obligate brood parasites, which are capable of raising their own young but lay eggs in the nests of conspecifics in order to increase their reproductive output.[145] The most famous obligate brood parasites are the cuckoos, although in total 100 species of cuckoos, honeyguides, icterids, estrildid finches and ducks are obligate parasites.[144] Some brood parasites are adapted so that they hatch before their hosts's young and either push their hosts' eggs out of the nest, destroying the egg, or kill their chicks, therefore ensuring that all the food brought to the nest is fed to them.[146]

Ecology

File:Skua and penguin.jpeg
The South Polar Skua (left) is a generalist predator, taking the eggs of other birds, fish, carrion and other animals. This skua is attempting to push an Adelie Penguin (right) off its nest

The diverse feeding habits and life-histories of birds are associated with a range of ecological positions.[107] While some birds are generalists, others are highly specialized in their habitat or food requirements. Even within a single habitat, such as a forest, the niches occupied by different species of birds vary, with some species feeding in the forest canopy, others utilizing the space under the canopy, while still others using the forest floor. In addition, forest birds may be classified into different feeding guilds such as insectivores, frugivores, and nectarivores. Aquatic birds show other feeding habits such as fishing, plant eating, and piracy or kleptoparasitism. The birds of prey specialize in hunting mammals or other birds while the vultures specialize as scavengers.

Some nectar-feeding birds are also important pollinators of plants and many frugivores play a key role in seed dispersal.[147] Numerous plants have adapted to using birds as their primary pollinators with both flower and bird having coevolved together,[148] in some cases to the point where the flower's primary pollinator is the only species capable of reaching the nectar.[149]

Birds have important impacts on the ecology of islands. In many cases they have reached islands that mammals have not, and therefore they may fulfill ecological roles typically played by larger animals; for example, in New Zealand the moas were important browsers, as are the Kereru and Kokako today.[147] Today the plants of New Zealand retain the defensive adaptations evolved to protect them from the extinct moa.[150] Large concentrations of nesting seabirds also have an impact on the ecology of islands and the surrounding seas, principally through the concentration of large quantities of guano, which can have appreciable impacts on the richness of the local soil[151] and of the surrounding seas.[152]

Relationship with humans

Industrial farming of chickens.

Since birds are highly visible and common animals, humans have had a relationship with them since the dawn of man.[153] In some cases the relationship has been mutualistic, such as the cooperative relationship between honeyguides and tribesmen in obtaining honey,[154] or commensal, as found in the numerous species that benefit indirectly from human activities.[155] For example, the domestic pigeon thrives in urban areas around the world and has increased in population as man has expanded. Many bird species have become commercially significant pests on agricultural crops[156] and pose a hazard to aviation through bird strikes.[157] Human activities can also be detrimental and have threatened numerous bird species with extinction.

Birds can act as vectors for spreading diseases such as psittacosis, salmonellosis, campylobacteriosis, mycobacteriosis (avian tuberculosis), avian influenza (bird flu), giardiasis, and cryptosporidiosis over long distances. Some of these are zoonotic diseases that can also be transmitted to humans.[158] Recent research suggests that the saliva of birds is a better indicator of avian influenza than are their faecal samples.[159]

Some birds are apex predators of their respective food chains, which makes them very sensitive indicators of pollution.[160] The decline in bird populations in the United States due to pesticide use is a famous example.[161] Birds and their diversity have therefore been considered good indicators of an ecosystem's health and, in the United Kingdom, it is used as one of the 15 quality of life indicators.[162]

Economic importance

Birds are an important food source for humans. The most commonly eaten species is the domestic chicken and its eggs; other popular species include geese, pheasants, turkeys, ducks and quail. Hunting remains an important method of obtaining birds, as it has been throughout human history;[163] however, hunting has led to the extinction or endangerment of dozens of species.[164] Muttonbirding in Australia and New Zealand is an example of an ongoing sustainable harvest of two seabird species.[165]

Besides meat and eggs, birds provide feathers for clothing, bedding, and decoration and guano-derived phosphorus and nitrogen that is used in fertiliser and gunpowder. Colourful birds, such as parrots and mynas, are bred in captivity or kept as pets. The popularity of this practice has led to the illegal trafficking of some endangered species.[166] Other birds have long been used by humans to perform tasks, such as falcons for hunting and cormorants for fishing. Pigeons have been recorded as being used as messengers as early as 1 AD and played an important role as recently as World War II. Today, such activities are more common either as hobbies, for entertainment and tourism,[167] or for sports such as pigeon racing.

Cormorants used by fishermen in Southeast Asia. The practice is in steep decline but survives in some areas as a tourism attraction.

The scientific study of birds is called ornithology. Birds are among the most extensively studied of all animal groups; chickens and pigeons are popular as experimental subjects, and are often used in biology and comparative psychology research. Hundreds of academic journals and thousands of scientists are devoted to bird research, while amateur enthusiasts (called birdwatchers, twitchers or, more commonly, birders) number in the millions.[168] Many homeowners erect bird feeders near their homes to attract various species. Bird feeding has grown into a multimillion dollar industry; for example, an estimated 75% of households in Britain provide food for birds at some point during the winter.[169]

"The 3 of Birds" by the Master of the Playing Cards, 16th Century Germany

Religion, folklore and culture

Birds feature prominently and diversely in folklore, religion, and popular culture. In religion, birds may serve as either messengers or priests and leaders for a deity, such as in the cult of Make-make in which the Tangata manu of Easter Island served as chiefs,[170] or as attendants, as in the case of Hugin and Munin, two Common Ravens who whispered news into the ears of the Norse god Odin.[171] They may also serve as religious symbols, such as in the case of the symbolism of Jonah as a dove (יוֹנָה) with the dove's various associated meanings of fright, passivity, mourning and beauty.[172] Birds have themselves been deified, as in the case of the Common Peacock, which is perceived as Mother Earth by the Dravidians of India.[173] Some birds have also been perceived as monsters, including the legendary Roc and the Māori Pouākai, which was a giant bird capable of snatching humans and based on the extinct Haast's Eagle.[174] In some parts of the world birds are regarded with suspicion; in parts of Africa owls are associated with bad luck, witchcraft, and death.[175]

Birds have been featured in culture and art since prehistoric times, where they were represented in early cave paintings.[176] As time progressed, birds came to be used in religious or symbolic art and design; among the most magnificent examples of this was the Peacock Throne of the Mughal and Persian emperors.[177] With the advent of scientific interest in birds, many paintings of birds were commissioned for books. Among the most famous of these bird artists was John James Audubon, whose paintings of North American birds were a great commercial success in Europe and who later lent his name to the National Audubon Society.[178] Birds are also important figures in poetry; for example, Homer incorporated Nightingales into the Odyssey and therefore inspired future poets to refer to this bird and Catullus used a sparrow in his Catullus 2 as an erotic symbol.[179] The relationship between an albatross and a sailor is the central theme of Samuel Taylor Coleridge's The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, the significance of which has increased with the adoption of the albatross as a metaphor for a 'burden'.[180] Birds serve as the roots of other metaphors in the English language; for example, vulture funds and vulture investors carry a negative connotation, whereas vultures are perceived as unpleasant and possibly unethical.[181] Perceptions of individual bird species may vary from culture to culture. For example, while owls are considered bad luck in some parts of Africa, they are regarded as wise across much of Europe.[182] Also, Hoopoes were considered sacred in Ancient Egypt and symbols of virtue in Persia, but as thieves across much of Europe and harbingers of war in Scandinavia.[183]

Conservation

This Black-browed Albatross has been hooked on a long-line. This type of fishing threatens 19 of the 21 species of albatross, three critically so.

Humans have had a large impact on many bird species. Human activities have in some cases allowed a few species, like the Barn Swallow or European Starling, to dramatically expand their natural ranges, while in other species ranges have decreased because of human activities and some have even become extinct. Over a hundred species have gone extinct in historical times,[184] although the most dramatic of human-caused avian extinctions occurred before historic times in the Pacific Ocean as people colonised the islands of Melanesia, Polynesia and Micronesia, during which an estimated 750–1800 species of bird went extinct.[185] Many bird populations are declining worldwide, with 1,221 species listed as threatened in 2007 by Birdlife International and the IUCN.[186] The most commonly cited reason for the endangerment of birds is habitat loss.[187] Other threats include overhunting, accidental mortality due to structural collisions or as long-line fishing bycatch,[188] pollution (including oil spills and pesticide use),[189] competition and predation from nonnative invasive species,[190] and climate change. Governments, along with numerous conservation charities, work to protect birds, either through laws that preserve and restore bird habitat or by establishing captive populations for reintroductions. The efforts of conservation biology have met with some success; a study estimated that 16 species of bird that would otherwise have gone extinct between 1994 and 2004 were saved due to conservation efforts, including the California Condor and Norfolk Island Green Parrot.[191]

References

  1. ^ Del Hoyo, Josep, Andy Elliott & Jordi Sargatal (1992). Handbook of the Birds of the World Vol 1. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions, ISBN 84-87334-10-5
  2. ^ Template:La icon Linnaeus, Carolus (1758). Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Tomus I. Editio decima, reformata. Holmiae. (Laurentii Salvii). p. 824.
  3. ^ a b Livezey BC, Zusi RL (2007). Higher-order phylogeny of modern birds (Theropoda, Aves: Neornithes) based on comparative anatomy. II. Analysis and discussion. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 149 (1), 1–95. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00293.x
  4. ^ Padian K, Chiappe LM (1997). "Bird Origins". In Currie PJ & Padian K (ed.). Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs. San Diego: Academic Press. pp. 41–96.
  5. ^ Gauthier, J (1986). "Saurischian Monophyly and the origin of birds". In K. Padian (ed.). The Origin of Birds and the Evolution of Flight. Mem. California Acad. Sci 8. pp. 1–55.
  6. ^ Clements, James (2007). The Clements Checklist of Birds of the World. Cornell University Press ISBN 978-0801445019
  7. ^ Gill, Frank & Minturn Wright (2006). Birds of the World: Recommended English Names. Princeton University Press ISBN 978-0-691-12827-6
  8. ^ Paul G (2002). "Looking for the True Bird Ancestor", pp. 171–224. In Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0
  9. ^ Norell M, Ellison M (2005). Unearthing the Dragon, The Great Feathered Dinosaur Discovery Pi Press, New York, ISBN 0-13-186266-9
  10. ^ Zhou Z (2004). The origin and early evolution of birds: discoveries, disputes, and perspectives from fossil evidence. Die Naturwissenschaften 91 (10): 455–71.
  11. ^ Paul G (2002). "Were some Dinosaurs Also Neoflightless Birds?" pp. 224–58. In Dinosaurs of the Air, The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds. John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore ISBN 0-8018-6763-0
  12. ^ Rasskin-Gutman D, Buscalioni A (2001). "Theoretical morphology of the Archosaur (Reptilia: Diapsida) pelvic girdle" Paleobiology 27 (1): 59–78
  13. ^ Feduccia A, Lingham-Soliar T, Hinchliffe JR (2005). Do feathered dinosaurs exist? Testing the hypothesis on neontological and paleontological evidence. Journal of Morphology 266 (2): 125–66. PMID 16217748
  14. ^ Prum R (2003). "Are Current Critiques Of The Theropod Origin Of Birds Science? Rebuttal To Feduccia 2002" The Auk 120 (2): 550–61
  15. ^ a b c d e Chiappe LM (2007). Glorified Dinosaurs: The Origin and Early Evolution of Birds, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press Ltd., 263pp.
  16. ^ Clarke J (2004). Morphology, Phylogenetic Taxonomy, and Systematics of Ichthyornis and Apatornis (Avialae: Ornithurae) (PDF). Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 286: 1–179
  17. ^ Clarke JA, Tambussi CP, Noriega JI, Erickson GM, Ketcham RA (2005). Definitive fossil evidence for the extant avian radiation in the Cretaceous. Nature 433: 305–308. doi:10.1038/nature03150 PMID 15662422PDF fulltext Supporting information
  18. ^ a b c Ericson PGP, Anderson CL, Britton T, et al. (2006). "Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils" (PDF). Biology Letters 2 (4): 543–47. PMID 17148284
  19. ^ Brown JB, Payne RB, Mindell DP (2006). "Nuclear DNA does not reconcile 'rocks' and 'clocks' in Neoaves: a comment on Ericson et al. Biology Letters 3 1–3. PMID 17389215
  20. ^ Sibley C & Ahlquist J (1990): Phylogeny and classification of birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.ISBN 0300040857
  21. ^ Mayr, Ernst (1970). Species Taxa of North American Birds/A Contribution to Comparative Systematics. Cambridge: Nuttal Orinthological Club. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  22. ^ Newton, Ian (2003). The Speciation and Biogeography of Birds ISBN 0-12-517375-X, p. 463
  23. ^ Weir J, Schulter D (2007). "The Latitudinal Gradient in Recent Speciation and Extinction Rates of Birds and Mammals" Science 315 (5818): 1574–76. PMID 17363673
  24. ^ Brooke M (2004). Albatrosses And Petrels Across The World: Procellariidae. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK ISBN 0-19-850125-0
  25. ^ a b Schreiber EA, Burger J (2001). Biology of Marine Birds, Boca Raton:CRC Press, ISBN 0-8493-9882-7
  26. ^ Sato K, Naito Y, Kato A, et al. (2002). "Buoyancy and maximal diving depth in penguins: do they control inhaling air volume?" Journal of Experimental Biology 205 (9): 1189–97. PMID 11948196
  27. ^ Hill DA, Robertson P (1988). The pheasant: ecology, management, and conservation BSP Prof. Books, Oxford, UK.
  28. ^ Spreyer MF, Bucher EH (1998). Monk Parakeet ("Myiopsitta monachus"). In The Birds of North America, No. 322 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Birds of North America, Inc., Philadelphia, PA.
  29. ^ Arendt W (1988). "Range Expansion of the Cattle Egret, (Bubulcus ibis) in the Greater Caribbean Basin" Colonial Waterbirds 11 (2): 252–62. doi:10.2307/1521007
  30. ^ Bierregaard RO (1994). "Yellow-headed Caracara" in Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6
  31. ^ Juniper T, Parr M (1998). Parrots: A Guide to the Parrots of the World, London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6933-0
  32. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). Adaptations for Flight. Based on The Birder's Handbook (Paul Ehrlich, David Dobkin, and Darryl Wheye. 1988. Simon and Schuster, New York. Retrieved on July 14 2007.
  33. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y Gill F (1995). Ornithology WH Freeman and Company, New York ISBN 0-7167-2415-4 Cite error: The named reference "Gill" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  34. ^ The Avian Skeleton. paulnoll.com. Retrieved on 2007-09-13.
  35. ^ Skeleton of a typical bird. Fernbank Science Center's Ornithology Web. Retrieved on 2007-09-14.
  36. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1988). Bird essays. Drinking. Birds of Stanford. Retrieved on 2007-09-13.
  37. ^ Tsahar E, Martínez del Rio C, Izhaki I, Arad Z (2005). "Can birds be ammonotelic? Nitrogen balance and excretion in two frugivores". J. Exp. Biol. 208 (Pt 6): 1025–34. doi:10.1242/jeb.01495. PMID 15767304.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  38. ^ Preest MR, Beuchat CA (1997). Ammonia excretion by hummingbirds. Nature 386, 561–62. doi:10.1038/386561a0
  39. ^ Mora J, Martuscelli J, Ortiz-Pineda J, Soberon G (1965). "The Regulation of Urea-Biosynthesis Enzymes in Vertebrates" (PDF). Biochemical Journal 96:28–35 PMID 14343146
  40. ^ Packard GC (1966). "The Influence of Ambient Temperature and Aridity on Modes of Reproduction and Excretion of Amniote Vertebrates". The American Naturalist. 100 (916):667–82
  41. ^ Balgooyen T (1971). "Pellet Regurgitation by Captive Sparrow Hawks (Falco sparverius)" Condor 73 (3): 382–85. doi:10.2307/1365774
  42. ^ Gionfriddo JP, Best LB (1995). "Grit Use by House Sparrows: Effects of Diet and Grit Size". Condor 97 (1): 57–67. doi:10.2307/1368983 Full-text PDF
  43. ^ a b c d Attenborough, D (1998). The Life of Birds, Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-691-01633-X
  44. ^ a b Battley PF, Piersma T, Dietz MW, Tang S, Dekinga A, Hulsman K (2000). "Empirical evidence for differential organ reductions during trans-oceanic bird flight". Proc Biol Sci. 267 (1439):191–5. PMID 10687826 Erratum in Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 267 (1461):2567.
  45. ^ Maina JN (2006). "Development, structure, and function of a novel respiratory organ, the lung-air sac system of birds: to go where no other vertebrate has gone" Biological Reviews 81 (4): 545–79. PMID 17038201
  46. ^ a b Suthers RA, Zollinger SA (2004). "Producing song: the vocal apparatus" Behavioral Neurobiology of Birdsong, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1016: 109–29. PMID 15313772
  47. ^ Scott RB (1966). "Comparative hematology: The phylogeny of the erythrocyte". Annals of Hematology. 12 (6): 340–51. PMID 5325853
  48. ^ Sales J (2005). "The endangered kiwi: a review". Folia Zoologica 54 (1–2): 1–20. Full-text PDF
  49. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D. "The Avian Sense of Smell". Stanford Birds. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |accessmonthday= ignored (help); Unknown parameter |accessyear= ignored (|access-date= suggested) (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  50. ^ Lequette B, Verheyden C, Jowentin P (1989). "Olfaction in Subantarctic seabirds: Its phylogenetic and ecological significance". The Condor 91: 732–35. PDF
  51. ^ Wilkie S, Vissers P, Das D, de Grip W, Bowmaker J, Hunt D (1998). "The molecular basis for UV vision in birds: spectral characteristics, cDNA sequence and retinal localization of the UV-sensitive visual pigment of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus)". Biochemical Journal 330: 541–47. PMID 9461554
  52. ^ Andersson S, Ornborg J, Andersson M (1998). "Ultraviolet sexual dimorphism and assortative mating in blue tits". Proc. Biol. Sci. 265 (1395): 445–50. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0315.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  53. ^ Viitala J, Korpimaki E, Polakangas P, Koivula M (1995). "Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light". Nature. 373 (6513): 425–27. {{cite journal}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |1= (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  54. ^ Williams DL, Flach E (2003). "Symblepharon with aberrant protrusion of the nictitating membrane in the snowy owl (Nyctea scandiaca)" Veterinary Ophthalmology 6 (1): 11–3. PMID 12641836
  55. ^ White CR, Day N, Butler PJ, Martin GR (2007). "Vision and Foraging in Cormorants: More like Herons than Hawks?" PLoS ONE. 25;2(7):e639 PMID 17653266
  56. ^ Martin GR, Katzir G (1999). "Visual fields in short-toed eagles, Circaetus gallicus (Accipitridae), and the function of binocularity in birds". Brain Behaviour and Evolution 53 (2): 55–66. PMID 9933782
  57. ^ Saito N (1978). "Physiology and anatomy of avian ear". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 64 (1) doi:10.1121/1.2004193
  58. ^ Warham J (1976). "The Incidence, Function and ecological significance of petrel stomach oils." Proceedings of the New Zealand Ecological Society 24 84–93. PDF
  59. ^ Dumbacher JP, Beehler B, Spande T, Garraffo H, Daly J (1992). "Homobatrachotoxin in the genus Pitohui: chemical defense in birds?". Science 258 (5083): 799–801. PMID 1439786
  60. ^ Walther BA, Clayton DH (2005). "Elaborate ornaments are costly to maintain: evidence for high maintenance handicaps". Behavioural Ecology 16 (1):89–95. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh135
  61. ^ Shawkey M, Pillai S, Hill G, (2003). "Chemical warfare? Effects of uropygial oil on feather-degrading bacteria". Journal of Avian Biology 34 (4): 345–49. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2003.03193.x
  62. ^ Ehrlich PR, Dobkin DS, Wheye D (1986). "The Adaptive Significance of Anting". The Auk 103 (4): 835.PDF.
  63. ^ Plumage Variation, Plasma Steroids and Social Dominance in Male House Finches James R. Belthoff, Alfred M. Dufty, Jr., Sidney A. Gauthreaux, Jr. The Condor, Vol. 96, No. 3 (Aug., 1994), pp. 614–25 doi:10.2307/1369464
  64. ^ "How We Use and Show Our Social Organs". Retrieved 2007-10-19.
  65. ^ Humphrey P, Parkes K (1959). "An approach to the study of molts and plumage". The Auk 76: 1–31. PDF.
  66. ^ a b de Beer SJ, Lockwood GM, Raijmakers JHFS, Raijmakers JMH, Scott WA, Oschadleus HD, Underhill LG (2001). SAFRING Bird Ringing Manual. SAFRING.
  67. ^ Gargallo, Gabriel (1994). "Flight Feather Moult in the Red-Necked Nightjar Caprimulgus ruficollis". Journal of Avian Biology. 25 (2): 119–124. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |month= (help)
  68. ^ Mayr E, Mayr M (1954). "The tail molt of small owls". The Auk 71 (2): 172–78. PDF
  69. ^ "Birds of the World, Biology 532". Retrieved 2007-10-20.
  70. ^ Turner JS (1997). "On the thermal capacity of a bird's egg warmed by a brood patch". Physiological Zoology 70 (4): 470–80. PMID 9237308
  71. ^ Roots C (2006). Flightless Birds Greenwood Press ISBN 978-0313335457
  72. ^ McNab B (1994). "Energy Conservation and the Evolution of Flightlessness in Birds". The American Naturalist, 144 (4): 628–42.
  73. ^ Kovacs C, Meyers R (2000). "Anatomy and histochemistry of flight muscles in a wing-propelled diving bird, the Atlantic Puffin, Fratercula arctica". Journal of Morphology 244 (2): 109–25. Abstract
  74. ^ Robert M, McNeil R, Leduc A (1989). "Conditions and significance of night feeding in shorebirds and other water birds in a tropical lagoon." Auk 106 (1) 94–101. PDF
  75. ^ Paton DC, Collins BG (1989). "Bills and tongues of nectar-feeding birds: A review of morphology, function, and performance, with intercontinental comparisons." Aust. J. Ecol. 14 473–506.
  76. ^ Baker M, Baker A (1973). "Niche Relationships Among Six Species of Shorebirds on Their Wintering and Breeding Ranges." Ecological Monographs, 43 (2): 193–212. doi:10.2307/1942194
  77. ^ Cherel Y, Bocher P, De Broyer C, Hobson KA, (2002). "Food and feeding ecology of the sympatric thin-billed Pachyptila belcheri and Antarctic P. desolata prions at Iles Kerguelen, Southern Indian Ocean." Marine Ecology Progress Series 228: 263–81. PDF
  78. ^ Jenkin P (1957). "The Filter-Feeding and Food of Flamingoes (Phoenicopteri)." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 240 (674) 401–93. Abstract
  79. ^ Miyazaki M (1996). "Vegetation cover, kleptoparasitism by diurnal gulls and timing of arrival of nocturnal Rhinocereros Auklets." The Auk 113 (3) 698–702
  80. ^ Belisle M, Giroux JF (1995). "Predation and kleptoparasitism by migrating Parasitic Jaegers." The Condor 97 (3). PDF
  81. ^ Vickery J, Brooke M (1994). "The Kleptoparasitic Interactions between Great Frigatebirds and Masked Boobies on Henderson Island, South Pacific." The Condor 96: 331–40. PDF
  82. ^ Hiraldo F, Blanco JC, Bustamante J (1991). "Unspecialized exploitation of small carcasses by birds." Bird Studies 38 (3): 200–207.
  83. ^ Klaassen M (1996). "Metabolic constraints on long-distance migration in birds." Journal of Experimental Biology, 199 (1) 57–64. PMID 9317335
  84. ^ BirdLife International (2007). Long-distance Godwit sets new record. Retrieved 14 April 2007.
  85. ^ Shaffer SA, Tremblay Y, Weimerskirch H, et al. (2006) "Migratory shearwaters integrate oceanic resources across the Pacific Ocean in an endless summer." Proc Natl Acad Sci. 103 (34): 12799–802. PMID 16908846
  86. ^ Croxall JP, Silk JRD, Phillips RA, Afanasyev V, Briggs DR (2005). "Global Circumnavigations: Tracking year-round ranges of nonbreeding Albatrosses." Science 307: 249–50. PMID 15653503
  87. ^ Wilson WH Jr. (1999). "Bird feeding and irruptions of northern finches:are migrations short stopped?" North America Bird Bander 24 (4): 113–21. PDF
  88. ^ Nilsson AK, Alerstam T, Nilsson JA (2006). "Do partial and regular migrants differ in their responses to weather?" The Auk 123 (2): 537–47
  89. ^ Chan K (2001). "Partial migration in Australian landbirds: a review." Emu 101 (4): 281–92
  90. ^ Rabenold KN, Rabenold PP(1985). "Variation in Altitudinal Migration, Winter Segregation, and Site Tenacity in two subspecies of Dark-eyed Juncos in the southern Appalachians." The Auk 102 (4): 805–19. PDF
  91. ^ Collar N (1997). "Family Psittacidae (Parrots)" in Handbook of the Birds of the World Volume 4; Sandgrouse to Cuckoos (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions: Barcelona. ISBN 84-87334-22-9
  92. ^ Matthews GVT, (1953). "Navigation in the Manx Shearwater." Journal of Experimental Biology 30 (3): 370–96 Full text
  93. ^ Mouritsen H, Larsen O (2001). "Migrating songbirds tested in computer-controlled Emlen funnels use stellar cues for a time-independent compass." Journal of Experimental Biology 204 (8) 3855–65. PMID 11807103
  94. ^ Deutschlander M, Phillips J, Borland S (1999). "The case for light-dependent magnetic orientation in animals." Journal of Experimental Biology 202 (8): 891–908. PMID 10085262
  95. ^ Mùller A (1988). "Badge size in the house sparrow Passer domesticus." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 22 (5): 373–378.
  96. ^ Thomas BT, Strahl SD (1990). "Nesting Behavior of Sunbitterns (Eurypyga helias) in Venezuela." The Condor 92 (3): 576–81. PDF
  97. ^ Pickering SPC, Berrow SD (2001). "Courtship behaviour of the Wandering Albatross Diomedea exulans at Bird Island, South Georgia." Marine Ornithology 29: 29–37. PDF
  98. ^ Pruett-Jones SG, Pruett-Jones MA (1990). "Sexual Selection Through Female Choice in Lawes' Parotia, A Lek-Mating Bird of Paradise." Evolution 44 (3): 486–501. doi:10.2307/2409431
  99. ^ Quader S (2006). "What makes a good nest? Benefits of nest choice to female Baya Weavers (Ploceus philippinus)." The Auk 123 (2): 475–86. Full text.
  100. ^ Humphries S, Ruxton GD (1999). "Bower-building: coevolution of display traits in response to the costs of female choice?" Ecology Letters 2 (6): 404–13. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.1999.00102.x
  101. ^ Miskelly CM (1987). "The identity of the hakawai." Notornis 34 (2): 95–116. PDF fulltext
  102. ^ Murphy S, Legge S, Heinsohn R (2003). "The breeding biology of palm cockatoos (Probosciger aterrimus): a case of a slow life history." Journal of Zoology 261: 327–39. doi:10.1017/S0952836903004175
  103. ^ Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW (1998). "An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system." Journal of Neurobiology 35 (5): 495–500. PMID 9369455
  104. ^ Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1994). "Male Blue Petrels reveal their body mass when calling." Ethology Ecology & Evolution 6 (3): 377–83.
  105. ^ Jouventin P, Aubin T, Lengagne T (1999). "Finding a parent in a king penguin colony: the acoustic system of individual recognition." Animal Behaviour 57 (6): 1175–83. PMID 10373249
  106. ^ Templeton CN, Greene E, Davis K (2005)/ "Allometry of Alarm Calls: Black-Capped Chickadees Encode Information About Predator Size." Science 308 (5730) 1934–37. PMID 15976305
  107. ^ a b Sekercioglu CH (2006). "Foreword" in Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 11: Old World Flycatchers to Old World Warblers (eds. Josep del Hoyo, Andrew Elliott & David Christie) Barcelona:Lynx Edicions p. 48, ISBN 84-96553-06-X
  108. ^ Hutto R (1988). "Foraging Behavior Patterns Suggest a Possible Cost Associated with Participation in Mixed-Species Bird Flocks." Oikos 51 (1): 79–83. doi:10.2307/3565809
  109. ^ Terborgh J (2005). "Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: Costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys." American Journal of Primatology 21 (2): 87–100. PDF
  110. ^ Au DWK, Pitman RL (1986). "Seabird interactions with Dolphins and Tuna in the Eastern Tropical Pacific." The Condor, 88: 304–17. PDF
  111. ^ Anne O, Rasa E (1983). "Dwarf mongoose and hornbill mutualism in the Taru desert, Kenya." Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 12 (3): 181–90.
  112. ^ Gauthier-Clerc M, Tamisier A, Cezilly F (2000). "Sleep-Vigilance Trade-off in Gadwall during the Winter Period." The Condor 102 (2): 307–13 .PDF
  113. ^ Rattenborg N (2006). "Do birds sleep in flight?". Die Naturwissenschaften. 93 (9): 413–25.
  114. ^ Milius S (1999) "Half-asleep birds choose which half dozes." Science News Online 155 (6): 86. [1]
  115. ^ Beauchamp G (1999). "The evolution of communal roosting in birds: origin and secondary losses." Behavioural Ecology 10 (6): 675–87. Abstract
  116. ^ Buttemer W (1985). "Energy relations of winter roost-site utilization by American goldfinches (Carduelis tristis)." Oecologia 68 (1): 126–32. PDF
  117. ^ Buckley FG, Buckley PA (1968). "Upside-down Resting by Young Green-Rumped Parrotlets (Forpus passerinus)." The Condor 70 (1):89 doi:10.2307/1366517
  118. ^ Carpenter FL (1974). "Torpor in an Andean Hummingbird: Its Ecological Significance." Science 183 (4124): 545–47. PMID 17773043
  119. ^ McKechnie A, Ashdown R, Christian M, Brigham R (2007). "Torpor in an African caprimulgid, the freckled nightjar Caprimulgus tristigma." Journal of Avian Biology 38 (3): 261–66. doi:10.1111/j.2007.0908-8857.04116.x
  120. ^ Warnock, Nils & Sarah (2001). "Sandpipers, Phalaropes and Allies" in The Sibley Guide to Bird Life and Behaviour (eds Chris Elphick, John B. Dunning, Jr & David Sibley) London: Christopher Helm, ISBN 0-7136-6250-6
  121. ^ Freed (1987) "The Long-Term Pair Bond of Tropical House Wrens: Advantage or Constraint?" The American Naturalist 130 (4): 507–25.
  122. ^ Gowaty PA (1983). "Male Parental Care and Apparent Monogamy among Eastern Bluebirds (Sialia sialis)". The American Naturalist. 121 (2): 149–60.
  123. ^ Cockburn A (2006). "Prevalence of different modes of parental care in birds." Proc. R. Soc. B 273:(1592) 1375–83. PMID 16777726
  124. ^ Westneat DF, Stewart IRK (2003). "Extra-pair paternity in birds: Causes, correlates, and conflict." Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 365–396. PDF
  125. ^ Gowaty PA, Buschhaus N (1998). "Ultimate causation of aggressive and forced copulation in birds: Female resistance, the CODE hypothesis, and social monogamy." American Zoologist 38 (1): 207–25
  126. ^ Sheldon B (1994). "Male Phenotype, Fertility, and the Pursuit of Extra-Pair Copulations by Female Birds." Proceedings: Biological Sciences 257 (1348): 25–30.
  127. ^ Wei G, Yin Z, Lei F (2005). "Copulations and mate guarding of the Chinese Egret." Waterbirds 28 (4): 527–30.
  128. ^ Short, Lester L (1993). Birds of the World and their Behavior, Henry Holt and Co., ISBN 0-8050-1952-9
  129. ^ Burton R (1985). Bird Behavior, Alfred A. Knopf, Inc., ISBN 0-394-53857-5
  130. ^ Schamel D, Tracy DM, Lank DB, Westneat DF (2004). "Mate guarding, copulation strategies and paternity in the sex-role reversed, socially polyandrous red-necked phalarope Phalaropus lobatus." Behaviour Ecology and Sociobiology 57 (2): 110–18. PDF
  131. ^ Kokko H, Harris M, Wanless S (2004). "Competition for breeding sites and site-dependent population regulation in a highly colonial seabird, the common guillemot Uria aalge." Journal of Animal Ecology 73 (2): 367–76. doi:10.1111/j.0021-8790.2004.00813.x
  132. ^ Booker L, Booker M (1991). "Why Are Cuckoos Host Specific?" Oikos 57 (3): 301–09. doi:10.2307/3565958
  133. ^ a b Hansell M (2000). Bird Nests and Construction Behaviour. University of Cambridge Press ISBN 0-521-46038-7
  134. ^ Lafuma L, Lambrechts M, Raymond M (2001). "Aromatic plants in bird nests as a protection against blood-sucking flying insects?" Behavioural Processes 56 (2) 113–20. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00191-7
  135. ^ Warham, J. (1990) The Petrels - Their Ecology and Breeding Systems London: Academic Press
  136. ^ Jones DN, Dekker, René WRJ, Roselaar, Cees S (1995). The Megapodes. Bird Families of the World 3. Oxford University Press: Oxford. ISBN 0-19-854651-3
  137. ^ Elliot A (1994). "Family Megapodiidae (Megapodes)" in Handbook of the Birds of the World. Volume 2; New World Vultures to Guineafowl (eds del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J) Lynx Edicions:Barcelona. ISBN 84-873337-15-6
  138. ^ Metz VG, Schreiber EA (2002). "Great Frigatebird (Fregata minor)" In The Birds of North America, No 681, (Poole, A. & Gill, F., eds) The Birds of North America Inc:Philadelphia
  139. ^ Ekman J (2006). "Family living amongst birds." Journal of Avian Biology 37 (4): 289–98. doi:10.1111/j.2006.0908-8857.03666.x
  140. ^ Cockburn A (1996). "Why do so many Australian birds cooperate? Social evolution in the Corvida". In Floyd R, Sheppard A, de Barro P (ed.). Frontiers in Population Ecology. Melbourne: CSIRO. pp. 21–42.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link)
  141. ^ Gaston AJ (1994). Ancient Murrelet (Synthliboramphus antiquus). In The Birds of North America, No. 132 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Philadelphia: The Academy of Natural Sciences; Washington, D.C.: The American Ornithologists' Union.
  142. ^ Schaefer HC, Eshiamwata GW, Munyekenye FB, Bohning-Gaese K (2004). "Life-history of two African Sylvia warblers: low annual fecundity and long post-fledging care." Ibis 146 (3): 427–37. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00276.x
  143. ^ Alonso JC, Bautista LM, Alonso JA (2004). "Family-based territoriality vs flocking in wintering common cranes Grus grus." Journal of Avian Biology 35 (5): 434–44. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2004.03290.x
  144. ^ a b Davies N (2000). Cuckoos, Cowbirds and other Cheats. T. & A. D. Poyser: London ISBN 0-85661-135-2
  145. ^ Sorenson M (1997). "Effects of intra- and interspecific brood parasitism on a precocial host, the canvasback, Aythya valisineria." Behavioral Ecology 8 (2) 153–61. PDF
  146. ^ Spottiswoode C, Colebrook-Robjent J (2007). "Egg puncturing by the brood parasitic Greater Honeyguide and potential host counteradaptations." Behavioral Ecology doi:10.1093/beheco/arm025
  147. ^ a b Clout M, Hay J (1989). "The importance of birds as browsers, pollinators and seed dispersers in New Zealand forests." New Zealand Journal of Ecology 12 27–33 PDF
  148. ^ Stiles F (1981). "Geographical Aspects of Bird–Flower Coevolution, with Particular Reference to Central America." Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 68 (2) 323–51. doi:10.2307/2398801
  149. ^ Temeles E, Linhart Y, Masonjones M, Masonjones H (2002). "The Role of Flower Width in Hummingbird Bill Length–Flower Length Relationships." Biotropica 34 (1): 68–80. PDF
  150. ^ Bond W, Lee W, Craine J (2004). "Plant structural defences against browsing birds: a legacy of New Zealand's extinct moas." Oikos 104 (3), 500–08. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12720.x
  151. ^ Wainright S, Haney J, Kerr C, Golovkin A, Flint M (1998). "Utilization of nitrogen derived from seabird guano by terrestrial and marine plants at St. Paul, Pribilof Islands, Bering Sea, Alaska." Marine Ecology 131 (1) 63–71. PDF
  152. ^ Bosman A, Hockey A (1986). "Seabird guano as a determinant of rocky intertidal community structure." Marine Ecology Progress Series 32: 247–57 PDF
  153. ^ Bonney, Rick; Rohrbaugh, Jr., Ronald (2004), Handbook of Bird Biology (Second ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, ISBN 0-938-02762-X
  154. ^ Dean W, Siegfried R, MacDonald I (1990). "The Fallacy, Fact, and Fate of Guiding Behavior in the Greater Honeyguide." Conservation Biology 4 (1) 99–101. PDF
  155. ^ Singer R, Yom-Tov Y (1988). "The Breeding Biology of the House Sparrow Passer domesticus in Israel." Ornis Scandinavica 19 139–44. doi:10.2307/3676463
  156. ^ Dolbeer R (1990). "Ornithology and integrated pest management: Red-winged blackbirds Agleaius phoeniceus and corn." Ibis 132 (2): 309–22.
  157. ^ Dolbeer R, Belant J, Sillings J (1993). "Shooting Gulls Reduces Strikes with Aircraft at John F. Kennedy International Airport." Wildlife Society Bulletin 21: 442–50.
  158. ^ Reed KD, Meece JK, Henkel JS, Shukla SK (2003). "Birds, Migration and Emerging Zoonoses: West Nile Virus, Lyme Disease, Influenza A and Enteropathogens." Clin Med Res. 1 (1):5–12. PMID 15931279
  159. ^ "Saliva swabs for bird flu virus more effective than faecal samples" German Press Agency December 11, 2006 Retrieved 13 November 2007
  160. ^ Kahle S, Becker PH (1999). "Bird blood as bioindicator for mercury in the environment." Chemosphere. 39 (14):2451–7. PMID 10581697
  161. ^ National Resources Defence Council (1997). The story of silent spring. Retrieved on September 14 2007
  162. ^ Gregory RD, Noble D, Field R, Marchant J, Raven M, Gibbons DW (2003). "Using birds as indicators of biodiversity. Ornis Hung. 12–13: 11–24. PDF
  163. ^ Simeone A, Navarro X (2002). "Human exploitation of seabirds in coastal southern Chile during the mid-Holocene." Rev. chil. hist. nat 75 (2): 423–31
  164. ^ Keane A, Brooke MD, Mcgowan PJK (2005). "Correlates of extinction risk and hunting pressure in gamebirds (Galliformes)." Biological Conservation 126 (2): 216–33. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.011
  165. ^ Hamilton S (2000). "How precise and accurate are data obtained using. an infra-red scope on burrow-nesting sooty shearwaters Puffinus griseus?" Marine Ornithology 28 (1): 1–6 PDF
  166. ^ Cooney R, Jepson P (2006). "The international wild bird trade: what's wrong with blanket bans?" Oryx 40 (1): 18–23. PDF
  167. ^ Manzi M (2002). "Cormorant fishing in Southwestern China: a Traditional Fishery under Siege. (Geographical Field Note)." Geographic Review 92 (4): 597–603.
  168. ^ Pullis La Rouche, G. (2006). Birding in the United States: a demographic and economic analysis. Waterbirds around the world. Eds. G.C. Boere, C.A. Galbraith & D.A. Stroud. The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 841–46. PDF
  169. ^ Chamberlain DE, Vickery JA, Glue DE, Robinson RA, Conway GJ, Woodburn RJW, Cannon AR (2005). "Annual and seasonal trends in the use of garden feeders by birds in winter." Ibis 147 (3): 563–75. PDF
  170. ^ Routledge S, Routledge K (1917). "The Bird Cult of Easter Island." Folklore 28 (4): 337–355.
  171. ^ Chappell J (2006). "Living with the Trickster: Crows, Ravens, and Human Culture." PLoS Biol 4 (1):e14. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040014
  172. ^ Hauser A (1985). "Jonah: In Pursuit of the Dove." Journal of Biblical Literature 104 (1): 21–37. doi:10.2307/3260591
  173. ^ Nair P (1974). "The Peacock Cult in Asia." Asian Folklore Studies 33 (2): 93–170. doi:10.2307/1177550
  174. ^ Tennyson A, Martinson P (2006). Extinct Birds of New Zealand Te Papa Press, Wellington ISBN 978-0-909010-21-8
  175. ^ Enriquez PL, Mikkola H (1997). "Comparative study of general public owl knowledge in Costa Rica, Central America and Malawi, Africa." Pp. 160–66 In: J.R. Duncan, D.H. Johnson, T.H. Nicholls, (Eds). Biology and conservation of owls of the Northern Hemisphere. General Technical Report NC-190, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, Minnesota. 635 pp.
  176. ^ Meighan C (1966). "Prehistoric Rock Paintings in Baja California." American Antiquity 31 (3): 372–92. doi:10.2307/2694739
  177. ^ Clarke CP (1908). "A Pedestal of the Platform of the Peacock Throne." The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin 3 (10): 182–83. doi:10.2307/3252550
  178. ^ Boime A (1999). "John James Audubon, a birdwatcher's fanciful flights." Art History 22 (5) 728–55. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.00184
  179. ^ Chandler A (1934). "The Nightingale in Greek and Latin Poetry." The Classical Journal 30 (2): 78–84.
  180. ^ Lasky E (1992). "A Modern Day Albatross: The Valdez and Some of Life's Other Spills." The English Journal, 81 (3): 44–46. doi:10.2307/820195
  181. ^ Carson A (1998). "Vulture Investors, Predators of the 90s: An Ethical Examination." Journal of Business Ethics 17 (5): 543–55. PDF
  182. ^ Lewis DP (2005). Owls in Mythology and Culture. The Owl Pages. Retrieved on September 15 2007.
  183. ^ Dupree N (1974). "An Interpretation of the Role of the Hoopoe in Afghan Folklore and Magic." Folklore 85 (3): 173–93.
  184. ^ Fuller E (2000). Extinct Birds (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York. ISBN 0-19-850837-9
  185. ^ Steadman D (2006). Extinction and Biogeography in Tropical Pacific Birds, University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-77142-7
  186. ^ Birdlife International (2007). 1,221 and counting: More birds than ever face extinction. Retrieved on 3 June 2007.
  187. ^ Norris K, Pain D (eds) (2002). Conserving Bird Biodiversity: General Principles and their Application Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521789493
  188. ^ Brothers NP (1991). "Albatross mortality and associated bait loss in the Japanese longline fishery in the southern ocean." Biological Conservation 55: 255–68.
  189. ^ Wurster D, Wurster C, Strickland W (1965). "Bird Mortality Following DDT Spray for Dutch Elm Disease." Ecology 46 (4): 488–99. doi:10.1126/science.148.3666.90
  190. ^ Blackburn T, Cassey P, Duncan R, Evans K, Gaston K (2004). "Avian Extinction and Mammalian Introductions on Oceanic Islands." Science 305: 1955–58. doi:10.1126/science.1101617
  191. ^ Butchart S, Stattersfield A, Collar N (2006). "How many bird extinctions have we prevented?" Oryx 40 (3): 266–79 PDF

Template:Link FA Template:Link FA Template:Link FA