Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 03:49 on 20 June 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• 110.142.166.98 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 614 five times in the last 5 minutes (Memes and vandalism trends (moomer slang + zoomer slang), details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 02:37, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:27, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• 89.100.58.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - . Vandalism and disruption across multiple pages, including removal of cited info, and disruptive unsourced changes. Exact same behavior pattern of disruption continued, after the IP blanked all warnings from its talk page.. -- Cirt (talk) 16:17, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Consider Dispute resolution. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• 121.218.79.162 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On Bosniaks (diff); vandalism after final warning. Seems like their goal is to vandalize.. Endofskull (talk) 16:46, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. Consider Dispute resolution. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• 159.53.110.143 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On User talk:159.53.110.143;. Person has had 11 warnings with no bans in a course of a year. Not sure what's the policy is for that but I guess that's why you guys are here. ;). Joel M. Chat ✐ 17:32, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

  Blocks are used to prevent damage to the encyclopedia, not as a punishment for accumulated warnings. That IP is likely shared by multiple users and very few of the contributions have actually been vandalism. ~ mazca ^talk 17:54, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• 63.239.65.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On User talk:63.239.65.11;. IP address has received eight warnings, many level 3, since April 2010 with no consequence.. Joel M. Chat ✐ 17:40, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses. HBC AIV helperbot7 (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• Most contributions appear productive and there's been very intermittent minor vandalism. Clearly a busy shared IP used by multiple people, not really blockable at this time. ~ mazca ^talk 17:53, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• 203.87.182.186 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - On User talk:203.87.182.186;. IP has been warned five time since last block. Two warning in the last 20 days alone.. Joel M. Chat ✐ 17:59, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• Note: User is in the category: Shared IP addresses. HBC AIV helperbot3 (talk) 18:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Insufficient recent activity to warrant a block. Near the top of this page it says "Unregistered users must be active now, and the warnings must be recent". That means within the last few hours at the most, not over the course of weeks. Exceptions are made where it is clear that it is the same user of a long period, and all or almost editing is vandalism, but neither of those applies in this case. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

• 75.101.115.117 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) - IP has received several warnings for being disruptive by delibertely introducing incorrect and unsourced info to airport/airline articles. Snoozlepet (talk) 18:21, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
• 69.169.142.7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism, including 1, 2 – Vipinhari || talk 18:30, 20 August 2010 (UTC)