Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reporting EvoNkcaJ. (TW)
m 1 IP & 1 user left. rm EvoNkcaJ (blocked indef by Nakon (ACB)).
Line 30: Line 30:
::{{AIV|e|a week}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 14:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
::{{AIV|e|a week}} [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 14:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Jakawaka}} - On [[Template:Pink Panther]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3APink%20Panther&diff=388683035&oldid=388450943 diff]); vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account [[User:Top Jim|Top Jim]] ([[User talk:Top Jim|talk]]) 14:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
*{{vandal|Jakawaka}} - On [[Template:Pink Panther]] ([http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3APink%20Panther&diff=388683035&oldid=388450943 diff]); vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account [[User:Top Jim|Top Jim]] ([[User talk:Top Jim|talk]]) 14:23, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
*{{vandal|EvoNkcaJ}} - vandalism after final warning, actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Only here since 1 October, 18 edits, none serious. I see there's a suspected SP tag on the user page but don't they need stopping anyway irrespective of the SPI? . [[User:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|DBaK]] ([[User talk:DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered|talk]]) 14:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:32, 4 October 2010

    Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

    Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention.

    Important!
    1. The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam.
    2. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s).
    3. The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future.
    4. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section:
      • * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~
    5. Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
    6. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing.
    This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action.
    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    This page was last updated at 07:30 on 20 October 2024 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.




    Alerts

    User-reported

    User has been incorrectly or insufficiently warned. Re-report if the user resumes vandalising after being warned sufficiently. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 14:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Stale report. User has not edited in a week. Daniel Case (talk) 14:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]