User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion

This page contains material which is kept because the contents are considered humorous. They are not intended, nor should they be used, for any research or serious use.

Deletion debates
Deletion today Editors Articles (by category) Templates Images & media Categories (active) User categories Stub types Redirects Miscellany Deletion review
Deletion policy
Process - log - tools Guide - Admin guide

Editors for deletion (EfD), originally created by R then recreated by LaraLove Jennavecia and then given to GlassCobra, is where Wikipedians discuss whether an editor should be deleted. Editors listed here are debated for up to ∞, after which the deletion process proceeds based on Wikipedia community consensus. The editor is then either kept, merged and/or redirected, transwikied, renamed/moved to another username, or deleted, deleted and salted, or deleted, salted and peppered (with a side of onion rings) per the deletion policy.^[Verify]

This page explains what you should consider before nominating, the steps for nominating single or multiple editors, and how to discuss an EfD. It also lists the editors currently under consideration and includes a 'hall of notoriety'.

Instruction creep

• You must not be listed here.
• The editor must not be listed here.
• The editor must be established and active, as new users may not understand the seriousness of this process.
• You may not list more than one editor per week.

If you want to participate in this page, the following must be met:

• You must not be listed here.
• You must understand WP:CIVIL, WP:NPA, and WP:DRRC, acknowledge that those policies apply here, as everywhere else on Wikipedia, and that any violations could result in a block. Be funny, not a dick.
• Your participation here can not exceed 1% of your regular daily edits.^[Who?]
• You must agree to never revert to re-add any comment that has been removed by any administrator (or the nominated user) for any reason.

Criteria for editor deletion

If you get past the instruction creep and understand the deletion process, consult the Criteria for editor deletion and the instructions below on how to list editors for deletion. Any debates which violate the above will be removed. Do not nominate anyone unless you are reasonably sure they will accept the nomination. If you are nominating someone you do not know well, please avoid embarrassing yourself and ask them if they will accept the nomination before nominating them. Further, no editor may be nominated more than once.

Instructions

To list a candidate, put his or her name in a level three category below, and leave {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Talk Notice}} on the editor's talk page. When ever you feel like it, close the debate placing {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/top}} at the top and {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/bottom}} at the bottom.

Nominees

Any editor nominated who finds it amusing and wishes to participate may add {{subst:User:GlassCobra/Editor for deletion/Nom}} to their userpage. Do not place this template on the userpage of another editor, even if you nominated them — they can do it themselves, if they so desire. Any editor who does not wish to participate may remove their nomination from this page at any time and list themselves on the opt out list.

Old discussions

Hall of Notoriety
Previous Discussions

Current discussions

Chzz

Sausages. Silly.

Self-nom. I'm such a silly sausage, I just made a page entitled User talk:12:24, 27 January 2011 when trying to reply to an IP.

"Dear Mr. 27th January..."

Clearly, I'm an incompetent buffoon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by  Chzz  ►  12:36, 27 January 2011

• First *WHACK*, then merge with Thehelpfulone (talk · contribs), and finally pwn because bacon is yummier. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 14:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• Deletion isn't appropriate when we can improve an editor! More sausages, and some time in the asylum. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 16:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• chain to the Help Desk. sonia♫ 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - user forgot to sign, clearly disruptive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [CharlieEchoTango] 18:13, 27 January 2011
• Have Chzz, now can haz burger? ϢereSpielChequers 00:39, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
• Ultra-strength socky support - user just made "Greekdelta" and then had to add, {{db|I am an idiot. Also, G6. Meant to make template page. PEBCAK}}.  Chzz  ►  00:18, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

HJ Mitchell

Twelve pints/whiskies? He is clearly drunk; just like how drunk driving can harm yourself, others, and the odd street sign, editing under the influence can cause serious damage to Wikipedia. Delete before complaints of "zOMG ADMIN ABUSE" come flooding in. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Eh? I'm not dronk... *falls off stall*, I'm perfectly so..., so..., sobe... whatever that word is! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Fixed: I swear to drunk I`m not god! --Addihockey10 ^e-mail 02:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Maybe it wis all those wiskees I given you then, sory ser i only had just 17 Tofutwitch11 ^(TALK) 02:51, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

• Field Sobriety Test, employ with TSA That'll learn you. l'aquatique[talk] 20:20, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
• Delete!! He keeps taking all the requests at WP:RFPERM before I even get a chance to do any! Quit hogging the fun stuff!! ;P -- œ^™ 21:54, 24 January 2011 (UTC) ps. I'm only kidding... don't you dare stop the awesome work you're doing at RFPERM!
• Free beer for all Then film the resulting escapades and put them on Youtube. sonia♫ 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Sonia

This person isn't all that notable. I mean a quick Google search returns 44,100,000 hits, well below my threshold of fifty million hits. This should have been done a long time ago but frequent intimidation by the person via late night phone calls have prevented me from doing so. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

• /me huggles Sonia Keep her trapped in the IRC, where people can make lewd jokes and play out overused and long dead memes on her, on account of her being one of only two females in the entire IRC. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:42, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep because someone has to keep Kevin in check. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
• Speedy delete : Completely useless editor who never does anything right. [CharlieEchoTango] 06:05, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep as the other one of the "two females in the entire IRC." Also, ten bucks that jokes about boobs will follow this !vote. —La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 06:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
  • lolboobs. Who's paying you?sonia♫ 08:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Your mother. I was supposed to pay her last night, but apparently it was the best bleepitybloopblop in her life, so I'm getting the money. —La Pianista ^{♫ ♪} 21:49, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
• Keep as notable poet and one of the people who have the rare gift of making IRC (including even quiet little Simple's channel), er... come alive. ;) Clementina talk 07:23, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

On second thought, we need her here with the urgency of a thousand thirsty sailors in the ocean, so speedy delete. Now. Clementina talk 07:41, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep! Shame on you Clementina! Besides, en:WP saw her first! - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 08:06, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

• Deleep (Keelete). I'm still on the fence with this one... -- œ^™ 11:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

• Delete - no room for nice users on enWP. PrincessofLlyr ^{royal court} 14:15, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
• I'm concerned her true nature might be exposed by the deletion process. So only delete after taking the necessary precautions ϢereSpielChequers 00:38, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
  • I guess I'd better put away that chainmail bikini then? :P sonia♫ 08:52, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
    • No complaints about the costume, it was the big knife that worried me. ϢereSpielChequers 16:10, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
• Delete and a bounty for her deletion for the right to compromise her account! Kayau Voting IS evil 13:57, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
• Support. Definitely meets criteria for promotion at WP:FSC. Anna Lincoln 10:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
• Delete She caused the server problems. Off with her head!! →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 17:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
  • sonia♫ 22:02, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

AN/I

Move to User talk:Jimbo Wales. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 14:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

• Comment: This is the wrong venue. To nominate a page in the Wikipedia namespace for deletion, see WP:MFD. ~NerdyScienceDude 22:40, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
• WRONG VENUE - off with his head. Killiondude (talk) 06:20, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
• FAIL. User:ANI was deleted two years ago. This discussion is flogging the dead horse. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

The Thing That Should Not Be

An unauthorized bot; also has no life because of addiction to a newly discovered highly addictive drug called huggle. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 02:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

• Delete and low level format (just in case) - only valid treatment for an unauthorized bot. Besides, the bot chose a username indicative of the fact that it should not be, further supporting this sanction. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 02:48, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close Support Keep Oppose Delete Neutral Merge Move Redirect Opinion Comment Delist Question Split Wait Bjaodn Undelete Close because of icons are shiny. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Comment "Newly discovred"? Ok then, if you consider 2 years "Newly discovered". :P The Thing // Talk // Contribs

• Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. Reach Out to the Truth 03:22, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
• Userfy to my userspace I've always wanted one of those things from The_Cat_in_the_Hat. I'm just not sure if he wants to be Thing 1 or Thing 2. =P Netalarm^talk 04:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
• Move to User:The Bot That Should Not Be and give him a bot bit. ~NerdyScienceDude 13:37, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

• Rename to User:The Bacon That Should Not Be So Tasty because this is the internet, then Eat. Hekerui (talk) 21:56, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

• The editor that should not be is clearly a {{G7}} ϢereSpielChequers 21:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
• Strong Delete and lock/oversight all edits! Pilif12p :  Yo  03:23, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
• Drain of sanity Jafeluv (talk) 04:21, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
• Bring Out from ruins once possessed. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 04:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete per Meta:Right to vanish. HeyMid (contributions) 17:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
• Move to The Thing That Should Not Have Been or unretire. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
• Block indefinitely as a sock of User:Master of Puppets. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Mono

No indication of importance/significance. This is distinct from questions of notability, verifiability and reliability of sources. THENEWMONO 01:58, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

• Delete, block, and oversight as a sockpuppet of Jimbo Wales (talk · contribs). ~NerdyScienceDude 02:05, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Very strongly neutral Is TheNewMono like the New Coca Cola? I guess since I dont drink soda, it doesnt matter to me either way. ROBERTMFROMLI ^TALK/_CNTRB 03:45, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep Delete Merge Userfy Neutral BJAODN Oppose Support Redirect List Comment. If you have the vote symblos script installed, please eat all the icons you see on the left. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:47, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Scrap Whilst Mono once served us with distinction and helped revolutionise our popular culture, it has long been superseded and now is totally obsolete ϢereSpielChequers 07:49, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Convert to User:Stereo. Hekerui (talk) 07:51, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete under criterion A7, unless indication of importance/significance is added, in which case speedy delete under non-criterion NC6. Reach Out to the Truth 03:28, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
• Trout this user is obsessed with their userpage! —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 10:18am • 23:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Access Denied

Non-notable editor; only 11.5 million Google hits. I also am losing my mi-BUNNY!!!!!!!!!!&Ybdfb6ar359j43hj5wre5wh345jhw4wse4r Access Denied ^talk _contribs editor review 05:25, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A9. Blatantly made attacks on other editors' choice of footwear here, here and here. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
• Eat with giant brick. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 10:20, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Grant Access. Doing so will remove this user and open his porn collection for me the greater good :-D Regards SoWhy 10:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Keep – 4 million hits on Google! As far as I know, access has already been granted... HeyMid (contributions) 19:22, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
• Swallow with giant ice cube - wipe that smile off your face. THENEWMONO 01:55, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• GARY COLEMAN per WP:FUCK. Dappl (talk) 06:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Deletion Denied per ghits. ϢereSpielChequers 07:56, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Delete User's userpage is a waste of valuable Wikipedia memory. Delete this editor!!! --Addihockey10 17:11, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Scramble password and disable email to ensure that access is denied. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:38, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
•  Done Access for this editor is now Denied. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:49, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

  Because they are blocked. →♠Gƒoley↔Four♣← 05:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Kayau

Non-notable user. Self-nom. Suggest WP:CSD. Kayau Voting IS evil 02:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

A long block.

• Keep. 52,000 Google hits prove notability without a shadow of doubt, and show that the nominator is on a deletionist crusade against themself. Also, the nomination statement is an egregious self attack worthy of a long block (pictured). Jafeluv (talk) 21:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
• Lego with a long block. Or maybe one of the thin bits that always get stuck on the other ones... GlassCobra 15:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
• Move to Encyclopedia Dramatica. Access Denied ^{[FATAL ERROR]} 03:48, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
• Abstain as voting is Evil. But then supply a pointy deletion rationale in the neutral column but because both sides read the neutrals, so excessive vowels, K? ϢereSpielChequers 21:37, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was 0_o --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 03:17, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Protactinium-231 (now called 4)

Self nom. A non-notable radioisotope of an obscure element on the periodic table that doesn't have it's own article on Wikipedia and only has 13,600 Google hits anyway. Delete. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Supah delete! Nobody cares about science. — The Earwig @ 16:31, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

• According to a well known encyclopaedia "Due to its scarcity, high radioactivity, and high toxicity, there are currently no uses for protactinium outside of scientific research." So I'm not sure whether to conserve this editor due to scarcity or delete due to toxicity. However it is superconductive below 1.4k - so I suggest freeze in liquid Helium and use to make servers based on superconductor technology. ϢereSpielChequers 20:47, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Will die in about 32760 years anyway, so kill him earlier and it won't make any difference. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Not fair. I only have a few hours to live. ²³⁴₉₁Pa (chat me!) 08:32, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Ban him for wasting server resources and impersonating User:Wikipedia. WIKIPEDIA, the free encyclopedia.

You faked the time. The time is now...²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

You're wrong, the time is 06:35 ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:35, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

No spoofing the MediaWiki interface. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:21, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Wow! That's amazing...time travel into the past! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 27 January 1756 (UTC)

Shut the fuck up. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

ARGH! No interwikis to Uncyclopedia. This is a clear violation of free speech. I WILL SUE YOU IN A COURT OF LAW IN TRENTON, NEW JERSEY. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Block as per Wikipedia:No legal threats. ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, world! You smell funny! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Oh my god! You insulted Jimbo! ²³¹₉₁Pa (chat me!) 06:24, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to Unobtanium then declare a lost cause. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 14:55, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Rename to macguffinite; using "unobtanium" on the big screen is just bad. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:36, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

• Ban per Wikipedia:No self attacks. bahamut0013^words_deeds 20:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy delete 4 is an unlucky number meaning "death" in Chinese the language of our future overlords. Don't give them ideas. Hekerui (talk) 17:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
• Delete because 4 is not, and never will be, Numberwang. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
• Merge with 7 Reach Out to the Truth 03:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was force Jimbo to wear a bikini. --Dylan620 ^{(t • c • r)} 02:29, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Ched Davis

Admin has come to my user page and :O OMG stolen mah commas[1], forcing me to protect them[2]. This is unacceptable behavior, and shows that he is probably a sock of Jimbo Wales. Therefore he must be deleted at once! --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Strong Remove from Jimbo's Underpants as nom --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 02:32, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Uber strong keep - If he's deleted I'll have to edit Bill Buchanan all by mahself ^_^ Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 02:39, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Punish Steal his commas for punishment.--Giants27(c|s) 02:46, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Get the fuck out of my underpants - Oh shit I've been found out... *runs*... --Jimbo Wales // get in my pants // adopt a wale // 02:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete from Jimbo's underpants? - this could go in so many dark directions. Somebody save me! ... mah "boys" need room to breathe! — Ched :  ?  03:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

  You pervert! you have "boys" in Jimbo's Underpants????? Speedy Delete Ched Davis!!!! </witch hunt> --Coffee // have a cup // ark // 03:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete for keeping young boys prisoner in Jimbo's underpants. That's just sick man. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:00, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• NOOO .. not "boys" as in "young men" ... muh nads, stones, nuts, twins, as in brass balls. .. sigh .. I have gots to start choosing my words better. Oh forget it, I'm sunk - Coffee - I'll get you for this!  ;~| — Ched :  ?  22:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Reluctant delete per sock User has by and large been a useful and thoughtful editor, so this particular sockpuppetry allegation is a bit of a surprise. But we can't have one person with two accounts having admin status, so plz chz wch act gets to keep the bit. ϢereSpielChequers 09:13, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• there must be an error ... good socks don't make mistakes. — Jimbo :  ?  — Ched :  ?  22:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

• Delete Although not as a sock of Jimbo. Ched is clearly a sock of Roger Davies (talk · contribs), he just misspelled the name to deceive us! SoWhy 22:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Per JarlaxleArtemis. XD Pmlineditor ∞ 11:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete far too polite for his own good, which raises the bar for everyone else.--kelapstick (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete agree with kelapstick too much politness in one person can't nbe good.--Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 21:03, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
• Distract with shiny object and steal commas back. GlassCobra 19:10, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Copyvio of User:Pedro, and a sock of Jimbo. December21st2012Freak ^chat 21:49, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
• Whack with a fish, then we can all enjoy a tuna roll. bahamut0013^words_deeds 19:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
  • I recommend eating a sausage roll instead. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
• Transwiki to Cheddar cheese. And what about Chad Davis?  Looks like a duck to me.  Chzz  ►  11:28, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was :

Floquenbeam

Recently passed in hell and with a remarkably calm approach. Refuses to reveal true identity, and thus I suspect this editor is actually a rogue adminbot. Suggest deletion and oversight of existence. Regards, --—Cyclonenim | Chat  17:47, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

I'm all about transparency, so oppose oversight. Not sure how I feel yet about deletion, will consider carefully. On a procedural note, shouldn't you have at least waited until I placed myself in Category:Wikipedia administrators open to deletion? --Floquenbeam (talk) 18:05, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Nope, you don't need either to be an admin or open to recall to be listed here. ϢereSpielChequers 22:46, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Overthrow. As a completely uninvolved observer, I have determined that there is indeed Wikipedia-wide consensus to rise up against the robot dictatorship and make Jafeluv the new Emperor and God-King. — Cafeluv // have a cup // 12:05, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

harej

Nominator's rationale: Destroy. This user and his robot army already control everything at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, Wikipedia:Requested moves, Wikipedia:Proposed mergers and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion, with the stated intent to achieve more Lebensraum at the peaceful realm of category renames. Clearly this user is after total and utter dominance and Jimboship, and should be stopped at whatever cost. Upon deletion, I will assume control of the robot army as your new benevolent dictator. Jafeluv (talk) 11:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

• Clearly you haven't heard of my plans to conquer France! I propose we suppress Jafeluv as a political dissident conspiring against the glorious reich. @harej 15:25, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete but after doing so, give the robot army to SoWhy. I have heard great things about that guy and I am sure he would do much more good with it. ClearlyNotSoWhy 16:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
  • This guy seems legit. (I had concerns that this was a plot by SoWhy, but then I noticed the username which clearly states that this is an unrelated editor.) I will consider appointing SoWhy to the position of cleaning my boots once I become Emperor. Jafeluv (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
• Strong neutral. I can't be bothered to make up my mind.. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
  • Even Stronger Neutral Because I can. ϢereSpielChequers 09:05, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

HLEP HERLP is this ok place to be asking question here? MY HOVERCRAFT IS FULL OF EELS helepe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chzz (talk • contribs) — Chzz (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Burn with fire And give the robot army to Hagger. Pmlineditor ∞ 09:30, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per "NO MOAR BOTS"! — Ched :  ?  03:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
• Execution by elephant. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:21, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Delete Remember Skynet? Hekerui (talk) 17:12, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was No Dramaz. GlassCobra 15:26, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Huntster

As nom I bring this before the community. User:Huntster has shown a blatant disregard for drama, has continually attempted to improve the wiki, has often been kind and welcoming to new users, and has consistently attempted to disrupt daily procedures by actually resolving problems. This type of behavior simply can not be permitted! I propose that this user be deleted post haste. — Ched :  ?  05:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete we have no use for quality people here. — Ched :  ?  05:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as serving no real purpose. Clearly a sock of some better editor. — Huntster (t @ c) 09:10, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• I thought that Dumpster and Hamster were both useful articles in their own right. Would it be possible to de-merge them? ϢereSpielChequers 13:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy keep and expand. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete as every claim is unverifiable. Unless sources can be provided no point in keeping.--Giants27 (c|s) 17:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Draw and quarter, productive admins must be treated appropriately. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
• Subst and Delete - So we can use him on Trout, Boat, and Goldfish. Rowdy the Ant talk to Rowdy 22:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NETPOSITIVE. User seems to think that we're here to write an encyclopedia. Jafeluv (talk) 08:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
• De-1337, fails WP:NORULES  Chzz  ►  09:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the editor for deletion debate of the editor below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.

The result was Death by horrendous singing, looking particularly at GlassCobra and TPH (my singing, of course, is absolutely excellent , but it's canceled out). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 02:26, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

King of Hearts

I was going to speedy delete it under G7, but since other users have made highly constructive, substantial edits, I am bringing it here for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:34, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

• Make him a bureaucrat, oversighter, checkuser, arbitrator, ombudsman, Trustee, steward, and a Jimbo action figure - He's already the king of hearts, why not make him the king of all WMF? Or, we could do that by merging him with Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, and Wikimedia Foundation. --Dylan620 (contribs, logs) 17:42, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• Promote to Ace of Hearts. --[midnight comet] [talk] 17:56, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not in the original. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 14:08, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Merge with Queen of Hearts, thus producing Prince of Hearts.^[3][4] More <3 is never a bad thing. Jafeluv (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

• Delete, clear ATTACK of a subordinate, or transwiki and merge.  Chzz  ►  12:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
• Put a skirt on him and make him the new mascot at Hearts. ϢereSpielChequers 15:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - the Queen of Hearts is always your best best. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 16:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
• Delete pfft .. trump their but ... Ace over king = delete — Ched :  ?  05:52, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
• Trump with Ace of Spades. "You know you're going to lose, cause gambling's for fools..." GlassCobra 16:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
• Cautious delete per G20. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:57, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
• Speedy merge into Gambling. Kayau Odyssey HUCK FINN to the lighthouse BACK FROM EXAMS 14:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
• Playin' with the queen of hearts / Knowin' it ain't really smart / Joker ain't the only fool / Who'd do anything for you Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 03:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the EFD talk page or in a rant). No further edits should be made to this page, unless you really want to, then go ahead.