Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism

Report active, obvious, and persistent vandals and spammers here.

Before reporting, read the spam and vandalism pages, as well as the AIV guide. To submit, edit this page and follow the instructions at the top of the "User-reported" section. For other issues, file a request for administrator attention. Important! The edits of the user must be obvious vandalism or obvious spam. Except for egregious cases, the user must have been given enough warning(s). The warning(s) must have been given recently and there must be reasonable grounds to believe the user(s) will further disrupt the site in the immediate future. If you decide that a report should be filed place the following template at the bottom of the User-reported section: * {{Vandal|Example user or IP}} Your concise reason (e.g. vandalised past 4th warning). ~~~~ Requests for further sanctions against a blocked user (e.g., talk page, e-mail blocks) should be made at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Reports of sockpuppetry should be made at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations unless the connection between the accounts is obvious and disruption is recent and ongoing. This noticeboard can grow and become backlogged. Stale reports are automatically cleared by MDanielsBot after 4–8 hours with no action. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

This page was last updated at 07:33 on 25 June 2024 (UTC). if it is out of date.

Alerts

Bot-reported

• 2601:483:5500:90a0:2d66:cc54:b862:f151 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 07:29, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

User-reported

• ADKIc3mAnX (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Im surprised this user has avoided being banned, since he has had SEVERAL warnings; including 2 final warnings which he ignored and carried on and even now he is,tragicially STILL vandalising/edit warring on wikipedia; all of his contribs are unconstructive and this madness has been going on for months now. It has even caused a veteran editor so much distress that he quit in protest. . User:Goldblooded ^{(Return Fire)} 13:06, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

  (Non-administrator comment) Looks to be a SPA to me, insistent on adding references or links to Michael Jackson even when there is no consensus to do so. Is MJ the new Kevin Bacon of the music world? --Alan the Roving Ambassador (User:N5iln) (talk) 13:21, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

  Content dispute. Consider dispute resolution.. To me anyway. Any admin is free to weigh in as well. Alexandria (talk) 13:53, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Seriously? Even though he ignored his final warnings and carried on vandalising pages? He hasnt made a single decent edit; he is, in all honesty a troll and a vandal and as i already said i cant believe he hasnt already been banned and because of this we've lost a long time editor User:Barts1a. Mark my words , if you let him free he will strike again. User:Goldblooded ^{(Return Fire)} 14:33, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting.. We have a very specific defintion of "vandalism" on Wikipedia, and "making edits that I don't approve of" doesn't fit into it, even if another editor storms off in a huff because of that. If you believe his edits aren't useful ones, take it to WP:DR, WP:ANI, WP:RFC/U, or any other venue that handles disagreements between good-faith editors. And please stop referring to good faith editors as "trolls" and "vandals", as those can be considered personal attacks if you persist in using the terms after we explain to you that the editor is neither. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:45, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

• 86.150.18.113 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Sun Devil Stadium (diff): vandalism after final warning. Seems to be on a tear.. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
• Texankudiya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Purely POV based edits. None of the user's contribs (since their first edit) are constructive.. — Abhishek  ^Talk 14:38, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
• Cm013353 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Sourav Mohanty (talk) 15:25, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
• 83.89.0.118 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) This is my 3d report for today, 21 October 2011. This User persistently continues to impose his own rules and deletes people' contributions on the OPERA neutrino anomaly page. Now he destroys the data such that they could be undone only manually. He claims that the reference I provide cites the primary sources which is not true because the only primary source here is the original OPERA announcement. Please, appoint some1 to make the final decision

and protect my contribution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User1344 (talk • contribs) 15:27, 21 October 2011 (UTC)