:<small><small>I reckon it was a confession... but to what?! ;) — [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' semper crescis, aut decrescis'''''</sup></span>]] 10:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)</small></small>
:<small><small>I reckon it was a confession... but to what?! ;) — [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' semper crescis, aut decrescis'''''</sup></span>]] 10:51, 7 June 2017 (UTC)</small></small>
== Repeated Page Deletion of ITC Infotech ==
Hi Dlohcierekim,
This is regarding the repeated deletion of ITC Infotech article which I have been trying to create for a while now. I'm a total novice here and had created the draft after properly going through the guidelines specified by Wikipedia and after understand the specifics of each guidelines. I have intentionally not tried to promote any article which is advertorial nor have I indulged in what you termed as "Sockpuppet". Hence, I would like to request you in helping me create an article for ITC Infotech by making me understand the specifics of the guidelines. I'm directly associated with ITC Infotech and have full authority for attempting to create an article. Kindly let me know how to proceed with this further.
Thanks in advance!
Revision as of 11:38, 7 June 2017
Crazy as it might seem to you and me, new conversations are added below the older ones. NOTICE-- NEW MESSAGES NOT LEFT AT THE BOTTOM OF MY TALK PAGE WILL BE REVERTED. Hence-->
Hi Dlohcierekim I didn't intend for the Draft to be deleted along with the posted article. Can you restore it and make it a draft so that I can continue working on it? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Forwhomthebelltrolls (talk • contribs) 10:57, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In case you didn't notice the TFD, the {{Multicol}} family is being replaced by {{col-begin}}. User:Dloh/a7 is one of the few holdouts still using it. Feel free to either change the templates to something different or subst the existing ones (they're all wrappers anyway). Cheers, Primefac (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dlohcierekim. I just saw you left a detailed notice about speedy deletion with a user [1]. Is that a templated message or something you made yourself? It's quite good, and I wouldn't mind using it myself sometime. --Drm310🍁 (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Yes, it's a template I made myself. I have essential tremors and need to use shortcuts in communication. If you wish to use/adopt/adapt it, it's at << User:Dlohcierekim/del >>. Dlohcierekim15:33, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Request for restoration of my page Sudhir Kumar Mishra
Sudhirmishraji (talk) 06:22, 20 April 2017 (UTC) Dear Dlohcierekim, being a new user at wiki, I got little confused and I could not follow the norms and keep re-creating the same page again and again. Finally, ~Anachronist explained me the main reason of this frequent deletion of the page. Now I am going to draft a whole new page with significant new information for Dr Sudhir Kumar Mishra, the new CEO & MD of BrahMos Aerospace. So I would request to please re-open/unblock this page. so that I need not to create new page. Thanks in advance. Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suniltada (talk • contribs) 06:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sudhirmishraji: I will restore the last draft version. User:Anachronist has protected the article page to prevent unwarranted creation. Furthermore, too much of the content looks like an advert for your company. When the time comes, you will need to contact him. Be warned-- I do not believe you are notable enough for an article in an encyclopedia. No offense intended, but few people are. There are, and I cannot make this point too clearly, insufficient sources in the draft unconnected to you directly or to businesses you worked for. There must be sourcing from reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking providing verifiable information. Dlohcierekim12:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that, looking over the MFD and the deletion log, I'm scratching my head wondering how I came to put your name in my reply to the restoration request at WP:REFUND. Clearly I should have referenced CambridgeBayWeather. In any case, the draft is now userfied. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for letting me know. We were probably the only two who saw that page, and unfortunately, I didn't subscribe. I imagine you were able to resist that temptation too. They will never learn... At least your deleting comment put a smile on my face. Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions22:18, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We no longer do "cool down" blocks, but I'm tempted to lay a 24 hour block on to give him time. If he switches to article space, we'll need to block him. Dlohcierekim23:11, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
He's free-associating. A number of possible causes come to mind. While he's adding blank verse to his user page, he isn't causing harm elsewhere. Dlohcierekim23:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Regards to deletion of Keep Victoria Beautiful article
Dear Dlohcierekim,
Thank you for notifying me about the violation of wikipedia guideline. I admit that the above article are not carefully written, I would write another with neutral voice and not violating spam or promotion guideline. I am new for wikipedia and really appreciate your feedback.
I would like to know that why the article " Lei Zhao" (the lead vocalist of a famous Chinese Band ) was deleted. He is a notable singer and I have included good resources. He had presentations on China's national televised TV programs and recently had a concert with 10000 audiences attended. I would like to know why this article was deleted, so maybe I can correct things to make it active again.
If you have a user ID, you might want to log in. I suggest using the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process. The biggest obstacle to article creation is lack of coverage in reliable sources with verifiable information. Sources must be independent of the subject. IMDB is not considered a reliable source. the appropriate notability guide is Wikipedia:Notability (music). Dlohcierekim10:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
moved comment from young thunder to new section at bottom of page
I recreated the page cause someone asked me to revise it so that's what I did. The reason for the myspace link in the first place is to prove the fact behind the success of a music artist building a large following and I feel it does follow the nobility rule because it shows value like you guys asked. You guys keep telling me I keep re creating this article but this what I want to write about. Just give me feedback to make it better. because it seems like after I fix one thing its always something else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Youngthunder (talk • contribs) 08:30, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The creators were not forthcoming because the creators were engaged in sockpuppetry. All of the Keep votes have been shown to be by sockpuppets. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:48, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
An RfC has clarified that user categories should be emptied upon deletion, but redlinked user categories should not be removed if re-added by the user.
Discussions are ongoing regarding proposed changes to the COI policy. Changes so far have included clarification that adding a link on a Wikipedia forum to a job posting is not a violation of the harassment policy.
There is a new tool for adding archives to dead links. Administrators are able to restrict other user's ability to use the tool, and have additional permissions when changing URL and domain data.
Following an RfC, the editing restrictions page is now split into a list of active restrictions and an archive of those that are old or on inactive accounts. Make sure to check both pages if searching for a restriction.
All is confirmed in official documents in Austria, General Direction des österreichischen Staatsarchiv; pls see my new references in the article
"Baron de Wael" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claas de wael (talk • contribs) 17:11, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This message is with regards to the recently deleted page of "Global Risk Intelligence". Perhaps there was a misunderstanding of the relevance to Wikipedia or a need for improvement on the page that was reason underlying its deletion.
To clarify, Regionscope is a unique methodology (a multidisciplinary approach directly related to geography, geopolitics, ethnicity, language, and history) that was created and employed by the organization as an alternative aspect to global outlook. Such an aspect contributes to the furthering of academia, which is also in line with many of the backgrounds of experts within the organization since there is a minimum Master's degree requirement or work experience equivalent to be considered member to Global Risk Intelligence. The organization is currently underway for inclusion in the upcoming Global Think Tank Rankings conducted by the University of Pennsylvania. Evidence of think tank activities would be present on the Global Risk Intelligence website under the "Publications" and "Events" tabs, which are common operations conducted by a think tank entity. Peer review processes for all publication lines are also implemented, which further bolsters the aforementioned academic as well as think tank relations and claims. Previous records of its activities (such as the "Risk and Security in the International System: The Great War Centennial" conference aboard the HMS President 1918) are available on a number of outlets, including Academia .edu as well as the Global Risk Intelligence site.
The Wikipedia entry is not simply recording the existence of a company or corporate organization but rather a think tank and consultancy. Specifically, the think tank category in this respect would be for-profit, which is noted by the Global Think Tank Rankings.
With the above considered, would you please be able to provide any specific reason(s) as to why the page cannot be reformed for uploading onto the site?
Lyonex (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Lyonex: Thanks for your note. The problems are twofold. 1) Sourced entirely from company webpage. Articles need to be sourced from reliable sources with a reputation for fact checking and independence from the subject. This coverage needs to be significant and in depth. 2) It reads like content from the corporate webpage. It's tone is promotional by nature, running afoul of our policies against using Wikipedia for promotion. It would need a total rewrite from a neutral point-of-view. Your best option is to follow the Article Creation Wizard link in the message in t yellow box. It will guide you stepwise through the process and should allow for reviewers to guide you should you go astray or need help. Cheers and happy editing. Dlohcierekim13:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock of Mimag343
Hello, Dlohcierekim. There are a couple of aspects of your unblock of Mimag343 that may be worth mentioning. Firstly, the block was logged as a spamusername block, but you unblocked when the editor had dealt only with the username aspect, not the promotional aspect. Of course, you are free to undue your own block, but it did seem rather strange. More importantly, though, when you unblocked you left outstanding unblock requests open, which resulted in my spending time on checking and assessing the situation. It is also possible that other administrators may have spent time on looking into the matter. Presumably this was just a slip, but I thought it might help to mention it, so that you can make sure that in future you don't make the same mistake. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 09:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just voted below you in an RFA. I use this syntax highlighter, and your signature caused it to highlight everything below your signature, making the highlighting useless. Could you please remove the extra apostrophes (''') from the talk page link in your signature? Right now, it's not making anything in your signature bold, but the highlighter thinks it needs to be closed with a second set of apostrophes. Thanks. kennethaw88 • talk02:13, 7 May 2017 (UTC)Done[reply]
Thanks for fixing that page, but your signature is still the same. Could you actually fix the syntax in your preferences page? kennethaw88 • talk19:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for working with me on different instances. Also, thank you for all the advice you have given me recently. Reb1981 (talk) 22:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is upsetting to say the least that I had completed my first article and have it deleted. The premise on which it was deleted is false and I wish it that you would fix this mistake you have made, with all due respect. Thank You.
@DylanSteed:Sorry, no. 1) It clearly lacks assertion of significance-- only 500 subscribers on youtube, and 2) is a little promotional in tone-- "The channel can be found at <<Redacted youtube>> ... or by searching "Maddoxine" by name in the search bar. " You are clerly inviting people to go to the site. Further, it needs to be reliably sourced from 3rd party sources unconnected to the subject. As I noted on your talk page, you might want to use the Wikipedia:Article creation wizard for a step-by-step guide through the creation process. This should help you eliminate and any problems before moving the thing to article space.Dlohcierekim (talk) 00:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Xx236:I'm sorry, what is it you are asking of me? My role ended when I declined the CSD tag and removed the plot that was later deleted as a copyvio. These sound like matters that need to be raised/discussed/consensus sought on article talk page. Actually, except for lack of sourcing, IMHO it looks like a viable stub. As to the other matter, it should definitely be discussed on the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:22, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see, thx for the explanation. We are learning How to Use Wikipedia in the classroom https://wikiedu.org/, so we need to use the Wikipedia site. This student's topic - superior performance is related to business strategy thus contribuites to the future of this encyclopedia. @— O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis Can you pls unblock the page so I could grade the assignment and then you can erase it for ever if needed! hope that will be possible. Mafi9 14:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maritzafigueroa9 (talk • contribs) [reply]
@Maritzafigueroa9:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi nailed it. (Don't sell yourself short. That was a very good answer.) I came close to not deleting that. But it was an essay w/o an identifiable subject for an article. It would be helpful if instructors who brought students here were knowledgeable of requirements for encyclopedic writing. I would suggest running future new articles through WP:AFC and using the WP:Article creation wizard to guide the process. There used to be a Wikiproject for shepherding the whole Wikipedia-as-school-assignment endeavor. I will link to it here if I find it. Thanks, Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dlohcierekim,
I trust you are doing fine.
I wish to contest speedy deletion of the article titled above.
Base on numerous reviews, I believe the aricle fulfills all requirements to be allowed on this reputable encyclopedia. It is not, in any way, purposely to promote the person featured in but rather to let people learn from his wealth of experince and numerous contributions to Nigeria's national.
I hope the article will be considered worthy leaving on this great encyclopedia.
bese regards.
IsahIsabah (talk) 10:00, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
@Isah ne: I think the problem with the thing is it is too laudatory/gushy/sycophantic of the subject. It goes to great lengths to say how wonderful he his. Encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone. The drier and more neutral, the better.Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dlohcierekim,
My draft 'Project Manas' was deleted today as it seemed to be promotional. I wish to contest in speedy deletion of the article titled above. I have been trying to edit my draft as it was being rejected as it did not have reliable sources.
I request you to let me access my draft, so that I can make the necessary changes and submit it again, also, I would appreciate if the major reason for this (speedy deletion) could be cited.
Also, suggestions on the same issue will be appreciated.
Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bringing bits to life (talk • contribs) 12:24, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Bringing bits to life: I'm sorry, but it was seen as meeting WP:CSD#11-- wholly promotional, unsalvageable, and needing to be rewritten completely. Content that is considered wholly promotional and needing to be completely rewritten is tagged for deletion on sight. If I restored it, it would simply be tagged for deletion again. You need to start over after carefully reading about writing in a neutral point of view. (CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO) Phrases like " aiming on tapping into the potential of " "and main endeavors is the " and " the idea that human control is the weakest link in transportation puts in the urgent need for autonomous cars in the society" is seen as NOT being neutral point of view. It is flowery language CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO). It is propagandistic. Leave out any statement about the subject being on a mission to change the world. You may want to ask for help at Teahouse (CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO), where you can ask questions and receive specific guidance.Dlohcierekim (talk) 17:13, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am a master student and I got a student job at GlycoSpot. I thought it was a good idea to create and article about the company and technology. It's my first attempt here in Wikipedia. I had classes all day yesterday so I didn't have time to connect and modify it until I got back home in the evening, but by that time everything was deleted even my draft in my sandbox! Could I recover the draft, please? I am going to modify it to make it more scientific. Do you think there would be possible to publish it? Thanks for your job! Laura — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laura Guarás (talk • contribs) 09:51, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Laura Guarás: PS. Look closely at the company MissionStatement/Visionstatement/Aboutus, etc. These are examples of how NOT TO WRITE AN ENCYCLOPEDIA ARTICLE. They are designed to promote the subject. Please read our guide to neutral point of view, WP:NPOV for help in writing an encyclopedia article.Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:28, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Deepfriedokra. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
This page was reviewd good by user: @Ellioth321: , In the dutch wiki this page is available and it's verified. Sherman Smith Hits are on big radio stations the link are available in the refference. He also had a lot of interviews at national tv of curacao. He was on one of the biggest magazine of curacao he also one the cover of the year award of that magazine..There is evidence with links and fotos.Can you remove the afd?
esliesmith (talk) 13:37, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dlohcierekim and Esliesmith: I did not realize that this page had been previously deleted, only that it appeared notable on the Dutch Wikipedia. Note that the previous deletion was for bad sources and (un)notability, and there were many revisions hidden due to a copyvio. While there are more reliable sources now, the page still needs cleanup to meet English Wikipedia standards. In light of this new information, I have gone and unreviewed the page, as it needs to be overviewed by more people than just myself. Elliot321 (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anne237au: Read all the linked polices and guidelines in the message I left on your talk page. That was clearly promotional, so needs a total rewrite. You speak of "our page". Interesting. Are you editing on behalf of the subject of the article? I will leave a message on your talk page about that. Interesting. You certainly lost no time putting it back up. Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You do not seem very nice about this. I am asking for help. Can you help? I've read the policies, but the copyright is owned by us, so I can't understand why there's a copyright issue. What else must we now do to meet guidelines? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anne237au (talk • contribs) 23:03, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If by "not being nice" you mean deleting promotional material from Wikipedia, I will do so. AGAIN Read the messages I left on your talk page. Understand them before attempting to build an article. I realize that if you make a living writing promotional material, you will find it hard to write in a neutral , encyclopedic tone. You may not write promotional material on Wikipedia. I've told you what to do. Only you can do it.Dlohcierekim (talk) 23:09, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Anne237au: I can tell you right now that Dlohcierekim is one of the fairest admins I have worked with. He is just doing his job. You have to realize that all the information that is put on here has to follow strict guidelines to protect everyone. You stat you are connect to the subject please read WP:COI carefully. Which I see that has been addressed to your talk page already. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising its a place to learn like it's been stated before. Reb1981 (talk) 23:59, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am new at Wikipedia and still trying to find my way around.
My intention was to first have my article reviewed but apparently, it was directly published.
Can you perhaps help me to get my article back in the sandbox and what changes I need to make?
The article is not promoting any specific product of company.
I am not associated with any of the references.
However, I am working on some IT developments on MES as an independent software engineer and believe that Cloud MES is a new generation class of MES software.
The development of this new class started in 2015 and now seems to become well accepted.
You deleted my new article Kihei Community Association before I had a chance to appeal the Speedy Deletion.
The deletion was apparently based on Kihei Community Association (KCA) not being a sufficiently important organization. While that is certainly true on an international scale, it is incorrect in its context. KCA is the oldest, largest, most active, and most influential community organization on Maui. I created the article because people complained that when they searched for KCA they found only uninteresting and irrelevant results (from their perspective) while they were expecting to find the history and goals of Kihei Community Association. I believe most of the KCA items listed on Wikipedia are of more limited interest than Kihei Community Association, e.g. Kikuyu Central Association which only existed from 1924 to 1940 has some historical significance but no current impact or public involvement. Kihei Community Association has had and continues to have major impact on development and urban planning on Maui.
@Mauirob:Thanks for your note. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. You should carefully review the links I placed on your talk page. Using the search tool link on your page, you should search for sourcing. You might want to recreate the article in you sandbox, rebuilding sentence by sentence, and having a reliable source unconnected with the subject cited at the end of each sentence. What I saw did not have such sourcing. ThanksDlohcierekim (talk) 17:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have only one account.
I'm not using multiple accounts, I only have one account. The reason you noticed i'm using multiple accounts is accidentally i posted a comment without logged in. Rather than that I only have 1 account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kamranhaider (talk • contribs) 03:47, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Kamranhaider: That's not it. There are several logged-in accounts editing in close sequence, giving the appearance of coördinated edits. If these accounts are connected in any way, such connection must disclosed.Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:53, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(talk, I saw those changes now! they are not made by me or any one i knew, This could be from other people who knows Richie Bello. As wikipedia allows any one to make changes in the articles/pages so i think that's why they added some contents. I added Richie Bello's images last day so may be they recognise him and writing about him.
I managed to protect the page juuuust as you were, and I overwrote your duration with a slightly longer one... sorry about that. Feel free to modify the protection I set without the need for my permission or input. Cheers -- ~Oshwah~(talk)(contribs)15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Dlohcierekim, could I ask you please use the {{RFPP}} template when replying to the requests at RFPP? I always use the edit notice list of templates calls as a reminder because there are far too many options to remember! The bots get a bit confused if you don't. Thanks, Woody (talk) 16:22, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why was the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Neil deleted ? The reason given was "does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". I cannot see the page as it has been deleted, but did it not mention that he is the parliamentary candidate for StAustell and Newquay in the UK General election, and so getting some information about him is relevant to over 75,000 electors. SherpaSam (talk) 12:46, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@SherpaSam:Thanks for your note. This is an encyclopedia, not a platform for informing voters. Generally, candidates, who've never won an election don't meet inclusion requirements for an encyclopedia. Also, the first thing one reads is that he was heavily influenced by his mother's illness. It was certainly unclear that he was a candidate for office. Perhaps if it so stated in the lede. Also, It's an article about a living person, so it needs to be thoroughly sourced from reliable sources not connected with the subject. Also, although it was not tagged as such, it is unambiguously promotional and probably subject to deletion for that. I have not checked to see if it is copied from elsewhere. (WP:copypaste) Nevertheless, I will restore the thing as you are not the article creator and are contesting the deletion, and see where things go from there.Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I will direct the original creator to your comments and suggest she edit it to be more in keeping with Wikipedias policies and intent. Or if I get the time may edit it myself.SherpaSam (talk) 14:20, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Techtonica.org
Techtonica.org[edit source]
Hello, I respectfully request that my deleted page be restored so that I may continue working on it.
Notability
I wish to add information on two news articles about Techtonica.org. Our second news article is in the works and we will have a date of publication in a few weeks (Jared Jones of Upworthy is one of them.)
I have spent the morning reading on neutral POV and notability and have bookmarked the Wiki Game for tonight when I get home. I can see that I have much to learn and I want you to know that I am up for it.
@L3X1: Long ago, I used my real name, before we had this concern, after I became concerned about the potential for harassment I changed it. I wonder if he's Kthomeer (talk·contribs·logs), who edited that page before him. Could just be his way of honoring someone he admires. Could be a dash of self promotion, but that would be prideful, so maybe not. I would ask the user in question if he'd like to choose a different name and explain why. However, "You are welcome to use your real name, but in some cases, you will need to prove that you are who you say you are." Discuss first, then report if discussion does not achieve satisfactory results. Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am going crazy working on these new pages today. It kills me how some just throw a page up with our working on it first. There sure have been a lot of promotional ones today, too. Reb1981 (talk) 01:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, i was recently notified that the draft page has been deleted due to copyright infringement, but i believe that all the sources were properly cited and the article did not contain any plagiarism; due to the biographical nature of the article, there were some similarities with the page of UMich but those were simply facts such as his positions and dates related to the article and not the actual text. Se3294 (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Se3294[reply]
Also, I would appreciate it if you put up the draft page again so I can make more changes and improve it farther; thanks. Se3294 (talk) 19:14, 27 May 2017 (UTC)Se3294[reply]
@Se3294: Thanks for your note. I have restored a non-copyvio (as best as I can tell) version. The removed section will need to be rewritten in different words than before.Dlohcierekim (talk) 05:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Also, whilst I am in your divine presence, would you mind doing the rev del here: University of Central Punjab all the edits by the red linked COI user and mean as custard's edit. I would update the template but it's a pain in the butt to do on mobile. TonyBallioni (talk) 07:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
NWA Wrestling Revolution Un-Deletion please.
Hello my name is Sergio Tamez and I am the owner and operator of the NWA Wrestling Revolution based out of McAllen, TX.
I would like to know if it is at all possible to un-delete my page as the reason given is invalid.
My wrestling promotion is recognized by the National Wrestling Alliance and we have a long standing relationship with the venue that we run shows out of (Cine El Rey - 6 years now)
We have been running weekly shows for over 5 years and our results are featured in Pro Wrestling Illustrated magazine.
Our Facebook page and Youtube channel are very active and can be visited to prove our legitimacy.
I understand if the page did not have enough cited sources, I will do my best to add more.
1) Could you probably help me and advise how can I fix the issues and publish the page about our Dublin church?
2) Could you advice how can I get old content? (I tried to do it myself ~ a half hour, but could not)
@Alex clear heart: Certainly! You need to find sources in the media, books, news that speak at length and in depth about the subject. (More than local news coverage.) You can then use those sources, cited where appropriate, for information on which to build an article. You might want to start work in your sandbox (there should be link next to the link to your talk page) and build up the article there. The article wizard can help you with the process. I will move User:Alex clear heart/Bethlehem Christian Fellowship and leave a link on your talk.Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion of British Columbia Conservatory of Music
British Columbia Conservatory of Music is the page that I created, I was wondering how can I add information that was provided by the school owner on the history of the school (written in neutral point of view, of course) ... would I cite the information as primary source? The information he provided is the following:
"The British Columbia Conservatory of Music (BCCM) was established in 1986. At its origins, the school leased space in the facilities of the Vancouver Foursquare Gospel Church located at 3525 Dumfries St. in Vancouver, British Columbia.
The school moved to Burnaby in 1990 where it leased part of the former Burnaby North High School, which at that time, was located at 250 Willingdon Ave in Burnaby, adjacent to Confederation Park. Three years later, in 1993, the school moved to its present site at 4549 East Hastings Street in Burnaby."
I see another page such as Place_des_Arts_(Coquitlam) that uses information from their school site (which can no longer be loaded) and was regarded was primary source. So I am not sure how to move further. Any feedback would be much appreciated!
Tulip77 (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you deleted my article TriageLogic before I had the chance to make edits or retrieve the information. On my talk page it states that I can contact you to retrieve my information. I am in the process of making edits, as this is my first wikipedia article, and now I can no longer do anything or see my text. I would very much appreciate the retrieval of my information so I can continue this process.
@Aherring11: Thanks for your note. Unfortunately, this was deleted as "unambiguous advertising" that "would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic". Your best bet would be to start again from scratch, leaving out promotional content and citing sources unconnected with the subject as you go. Only include material in a neutral point of view from sources unconnected with the subject. Product reviews generally have the same promotional tone, so beware of them. You might want to read about neutral point of view at WP:NPOV. Restoring it in its present state would be futile, as it would simply be deleted again. Thanks, Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:27, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Tequila Jim
Hello: The above-referenced article (and artist) warrants closer review, as there is substantial significance and importance for this artist and his work. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jzisiades (talk • contribs) 19:51, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jzisiade: Thanks for your note. Sources? Linked in? Linked in is not a reliable source independent of the subject. Content is not promising, I'm afraid. Review quotes like "Tequila Jim: This guy is a character of the highest order and one of the nest local songcrafters you’ll hear. He tells his tales of bravery and adventure in our October issue," make it sound promotional. As does, "He’s funny, often left-of-center, and a brilliant song-crafter." << http://www.msmfest.com/lineup >> is some sort of promo page, does not treat the subject in depth. Nothing, regrettably, there comes close to showing significance, let alone meeting WP:GNG. Reads like one big incoherent collection of advertisements. Sorry, but it will need a total rewrite to come close to being an encyclopedia article. Are you the original article creator using a different nick?? Oh, I see I laid my deletion message on your talk page. Please do read the linked materials. Also, please read Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Lead_section to guide you in writing a lead. You might want to follow the article creation wizard link and take things one step at a time, citing sources as you go. Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
deleted pages by sockpuppet
See several pages deleted that were created by banned sock puppet captkoons9 that are just as notable as other pages created by that user. would it be possible to re-review some of those?
I was trying to see if I had not known a word in the lexicon that I should have known, and due to this page that you removed, I was able to get my answer using 'Look Up' on Mac OS X (uses the Wiki API) until you took the page down. In this case I think for the time-being, so people can get this info quickly like I was doing.
Hi... I'm an engineer at Immersion Corp. I'm trying to have a conversation with the volunteers who monitor that entry. I believe that the article's portrayal of Immersion as a "patent troll" is misleading and supported by very little evidence. I believe that my argument to the contrary is stronger.
I posted to the Immersion Corporation Talk page, as someone with a COI is expected to do. However, you recommended my Talk post be deleted as well as recommending my personal user page for speedy deletion. I’ve updated my user page according to advice I got from the Teahouse where they recommended I remove hyperlinks and more clearly disclose my purpose for creating a User Page. I’m hoping to repost my initial comment to continue the conversation.
An RfC proposing an off-wiki LTA database has been closed. The proposal was broadly supported, with further discussion required regarding what to do with the existing LTA database and defining access requirements. Such a tool/database formed part of the Community health initiative's successful grant proposal.
Some clarifications have been made to the community banning and unblocking policies that effectively sync them with current practice. Specifically, the community has reached a consensus that when blocking a user at WP:AN or WP:ANI, it is considered a "community sanction", and administrators cannot unblock unilaterally if the user has not successfully appealed the sanction to the community.
@Inovativeguy: 2 reasons- you created it on the talk page, you created it w/ a speedy deletion tag. Looks like you had a copy sitting around since December. It was recreated w/ deletion tags then too. Try pasting it to the article page, only w/o the deletion tags. Dlohcierekim (talk) 06:15, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Allow me to reconstuct Southern City Colleges and to resolve the issues in regarding how the article was constructed. I understand how it was poorly constructed and had resulted to several issue and had once nominated for deletion. As to the main subject of the article, Southern City Colleges does exist and is worthy to have its own article since it is one of the oldest institution to Zamboanga City.
Just FYI, but the user's creation don't actually appear to be promotional. Rather, as far as I can tell, they are entirely invented subjects. They all seem to trace back to greenytoonsuniverse.wikia.com, which itself, doesn't actually seem to be about anything. It's... a lot of invented articles that don't actually seem to have any basis in any real or fictional universe as far as I can tell. It's actually a little bizarre. TimothyJosephWood08:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, with promospeak like "a masterful business leader, author, teacher and educator, who is remarkably successful at empowering individuals and teams to achieve their full potential." <gagging /> Might want to tag for U5, but I see G11 is already there. Might want to engage user in discussion about W not being a webhost. Has he made other edits? Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:02, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you patrolling user pages? There's like a fifty gagillion page backlog on articles. Are you just trying to get more experience before going after articles?
There is also a huge backlog in userpage patrol and even fewer editors working on it. Lots of spam, copyvio, hoaxes etc. In page curation tool you can select either Articles or Userpages. I work both. Killing off spam before it gets copied into mainspace is another reason. Legacypac (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Legacypac: Well, the difference is that a userspace draft can sit there literally forever, and it probably won't harm anything. Memory is cheap...very cheap. But a new article after a few months automatically gets the NOINDEX removed, meaning it's visible to search engines, and is more likely to be seen by someone. In fact, user pages aren't even currently counted in the NPP backlog. TimothyJosephWood21:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No index is stripped after 30 days in mainspace. Userpages are visable in Google - try it. If you switch to Userpages in the Page Curation tool you can see the backlog, well part of it. They fall off the NPP patrol list at some point. See also WP:ABANDONED I both deleting problimatic material and resurfacing useful material. Legacypac (talk) 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Only really old userpages are indexed. A google search for each of our names shows only things we've done tangentially (mostly reports and non-Wikipedia wikis). Obviously no one has any call to stop you doing whatever it is you want to do, I think TJW just wanted to give you a helpful suggestion. Primefac (talk) 21:46, 4 June 2017 (UTC)(talk page stalker)[reply]
For the record, I am much more concerned with currently posted promo spam, unsourced BLP's and unpatrolled new pages than I will ever be for stale user pages.Dlohcierekim (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I started a thread at WP:VPT, because AFAIK, this shouldn't be a thing. I mean, I could understand if my first account was indexed, but this one is only three years old. TimothyJosephWood22:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unknowingly I have created that user name and page and uploaded, as I was unaware of Wikipedia policies, it was my mistake, I apologies.
kindly guide me for further action from my side
Hi there. You deleted Yolancer citing that AfD but didn't close the AfD itself. I did so now but it would be good if you could add your reasoning to the AfD. Regards SoWhy16:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
deletion of my page Bahria Foundation School Sagri
Hi
I just want to know what has happened to my page Bahria Foundation School Sagri. Upon search it redirects to another page. Kindly help resolve my issue. My page is genuinely created by me and does provide the require source also.
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haleemasadia (talk • contribs) 18:28, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Dlohcierekim, hope you're well. Just wondering- could you give me the editors who repeatedly created this article? If that's allowed, of course. The first couple anyway, as they're not in my log. Since it's been recreated ?five times, and by multiple accounts, I think it's time to give those good people at SPI something to do :) cheers! — O Fortuna semper crescis, aut decrescis10:13, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi I'm pretty much a novice at the Wikipedia.
I'd updated my profile to highlight who I was and my authority to make changes to factually incorrect content about our organization on Wikipedia.
Looks like that stayed into your definition of advertising rather than clear identification of a user's identity and qualification to make changes.
Not to worry, I've created a new profile and kept it simple. Hopefully this will avoid the instant death suffered by my previous attempt.
Best regards, AngusRussell — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.73.212.210 (talk) 10:21, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
This is regarding the repeated deletion of ITC Infotech article which I have been trying to create for a while now. I'm a total novice here and had created the draft after properly going through the guidelines specified by Wikipedia and after understand the specifics of each guidelines. I have intentionally not tried to promote any article which is advertorial nor have I indulged in what you termed as "Sockpuppet". Hence, I would like to request you in helping me create an article for ITC Infotech by making me understand the specifics of the guidelines. I'm directly associated with ITC Infotech and have full authority for attempting to create an article. Kindly let me know how to proceed with this further.